RBI Notifications

RBI’s guidelines on State ‘Guarantees’ on Borrowings

Note4Students

From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :

Prelims level: Sovereign 'Guarantee'

Mains level: Not Much

Introduction

  • A working group constituted by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has presented key recommendations to address challenges related to guarantees extended by State governments.

Understanding ‘Guarantee’

  • A ‘guarantee’ involves a legal obligation for a State to make payments on behalf of a borrower, safeguarding investors/lenders from default risks.
  • As defined by the Indian Contracts Act (1872), it is a contract involving three parties: the principal debtor, creditor, and surety (State government).
  • The ‘guarantee’ acts as a safety net, ensuring payment in case of default by the borrower.

Purpose of ‘Guarantee’ at the State Level

  • Sovereign Guarantee: Facilitates concessional loans from bilateral or multilateral agencies to public sector enterprises.
  • Project Viability: Enhances project viability for activities with significant social and economic benefits.
  • Resource Mobilization: Enables public sector enterprises to secure resources at favorable terms, contributing to lower interest charges.

Fiscal Risks and Working Group Recommendations

  • Cash Outflows and Debt: While guarantees may not require upfront cash payments, they pose fiscal risks, leading to unanticipated cash outflows and increased debt during challenging times.
  • Complex Estimation: Estimating the quantum and timing of potential costs/cash outflows is challenging due to triggers associated with guarantees.

Recommendations on ‘Guarantee’ Definition and Guidelines

  • Broadened Definition: The term ‘guarantee’ should encompass all instruments creating obligations for the guarantor (State) to make future payments on behalf of the borrower.
  • Guidelines for Accordance: Government guarantees should not substitute budgetary resources and should adhere to Government of India guidelines.
  • Preconditions: Specify preconditions, including the period of guarantee, guarantee fee, government representation on the management board, and audit rights.

Risk Determination, Fee, and Ceiling

  • Risk Weight Assignment: States should assign risk weights (high, medium, low) before extending guarantees, considering past defaults.
  • Ceiling on Guarantees: A desirable ceiling for incremental guarantees during a year, limiting stress on state governments.
  • Guarantee Fee Structure: Reflective of borrower’s project riskiness and activities, with a base fee of at least 2.5% per annum.

Disclosures and Honouring Commitments

  • Credit Disclosure: Banks/NBFCs should disclose credit extended to State-owned entities backed by State guarantees for improved credibility.
  • Database Establishment: Set up a state-level unit to track and consolidate all guarantees, ensuring proper data compilation.
  • Timely Honouring: States must honor guarantees without delay, recognizing the reputational and legal risks associated with defaults.

Conclusion

  • The RBI working group’s recommendations aim to fortify fiscal management by introducing standardized practices, enhancing risk assessment, and ensuring transparent disclosures.
  • These measures, if implemented, can contribute to better fiscal discipline and mitigate potential risks associated with state government guarantees.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

JOIN THE COMMUNITY

Join us across Social Media platforms.

💥Mentorship New Batch Launch
💥Mentorship New Batch Launch