First part of the answer should bring out how the issue of nuclear weapons has its own moral dimensions. Then one should examine the different ethical dimensions of the statement. They may be:
- Stability in world affairs v/s always living under fear.
- If Nuclear weapons in themselves are moral or immoral
- From the point of view of Utilitarianism and deontology.
- Money for weapons v/s money for poor and other developmental objectives
Suitable examples provided to support the arguments. Preferably the conclusion should favor the disarmament.