What precautions are needed while criticizing the performance of subordinates? Suppose you are head of a disaster management team. You have assigned the task of distribution of foodgrain to one of your subordinates which he is unable to handle properly. How will you comment on his performance? (250 words)

Civil servants must ensure that they analyze the performance of their juniors critically. They should let their juniors know about these shortcomings so that they can improve upon them. Following precautions are needed while criticizing the performance of subordinates:
• Specificity: Criticism or comments should be specific.
• Providing or suggesting a solution: The senior civil servant should offer a solution to the shortcomings.
• Face to face contact: They should say whatever they want to say on the face of the subordinate.
• Empathy: The subordinate should be treated in an empathetic manner. One should always remember that mistakes in performance take place because of lack of experience. So rather than being rude or arrogant, they must be soft towards their subordinates or juniors.

While making comments on the performance of a subordinate who has been involved with the distribution of food grain, comment should be specific that in a particular village 2 or 4 families have been left out and could not be provided with food grain.

The subordinate could be suggested that this omission could be corrected while providing them food grain in the second round. It is always better to call the officer separately and tell him instead of making this comment when he is not there. Since the officer is quite junior and lacks experience hence one should be empathetic to him. He should tell him that though he has performed well but there are certain things which he can improve upon next time.

  • Subscribe

    Do not miss important study material

14
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
7 Comment threads
7 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
8 Comment authors
Yogesh PrajapatiParth VermaAmandeep KaurAshraf Alisiddhant singh parmar Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Wasim Rahman
Member

Pls review
Payment ID – MOJO9731S00A34242506

New Doc 2019-09-02 23.30.44_9.jpg
New Doc 2019-09-02 23.30.44_8.jpg
New Doc 2019-09-02 23.30.44_7.jpg
siddhant singh parmar
Member

Good answer but i think point no .6 is redundant in first part.. And 2nd part can be more formal to the demand of question. Rest is fine. Good Use of ethical values to substantiate answer.

Anmol
Member

Please review and revert.

sahithya kasiraju
Member

Payment ID: MOJO9802W00A98715356
Please review

critics_3.jpg
critics_2.jpg
critics_1.jpg
siddhant singh parmar
Member

Dear @parth sir , Please provide your valuable suggestions.

Ashraf Ali
Member

MOJO9803C0096073071

Amandeep Kaur
Member

IDMOJO9728J00A50299555

Yogeshkumar Prajapati
Member

Mojo id-MOJO9908R00A36163556