💥UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (April Batch) + Access XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF

Search results for: “”

  • [Burning Issue] Assam-Mizoram Border Dispute

    Northeast India has been witnessing inter-state border disputes since the early 1960s when the process of carving out states from the undivided Assam commenced.

    The most recent in the series of border disputes that plagued the region is the Assam–Mizoram border, which has been witnessing violent incidents since 2020.

    What is the recent dispute?

    In the recent incident, five policemen lost their lives and many were injured as a result of firing between the forces of Assam and Mizoram. Border disputes are not uncommon but it is the war-like confrontation between police personnel of the same country that is regretful and alarming. The violence spotlights the long-standing inter-state boundary issues in the Northeast, particularly between Assam and the states that were carved out of it.

    About Assam-Mizoram Boundary Dispute

    • The boundary between present-day Assam and Mizoram, 165 km long, dates back to the colonial era, when Mizoram was known as Lushai Hills, a district of Assam.
    • The Assam-Mizoram border is shared between three districts of South Assam — Cachar, Hailakandi and Karimganj — and three districts of Mizoram — Kolasib, Mamit and Aizawl
    • Mizoram says Assam has been pushing its people 10-12 km inside their territory.
    • Mizoram’s official stand is that the boundary should be demarcated on the basis of notification in 1875 that distinguished the Lushai Hills (erstwhile district of Assam that became Mizoram) from the plains of Cachar.
    • The notification is based on the Bengal Eastern Frontier Regulation Act, 1873, which makes it obligatory for Indians beyond to possess a travel document to enter Mizoram.
    • Assam also has border disputes with Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, and Nagaland.

    Had there been any confrontations in the Past?

    • There have been confrontations over territory in the northeast region in the past. For instance, at least 28 policemen were killed in clashes on the Assam-Nagaland border in June 1985.
    • The NSCN’s (National Socialist Council of Nagaland) demand for a Greater Nagaland or Nagalim.
    • This includes parts of Assam, Manipur, and Arunachal Pradesh. It has been a major roadblock in the resolution of the Naga issue.
    • Manipur has had its share of inter-state disputes resulting in destructive economic blockades.
    • The Assam-Mizoram border has seen the increase in violent incidents, particularly since last year, necessitating the deployment of paramilitary forces.

    What is the present situation?

    • At present, the situation remains tense along the border.
    • Central forces are deployed along the border—Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB) and CRPF on Assam side and the Border Security Force (BSF) on Mizoram side of the border—to act as a buffer between the state police forces.
    • Efforts are being made to diffuse the tension. Most of the meetings between the officials intended to defuse tensions following border clashes rather than finding a permanent solution.
    • In this respect, in wake of a similar violent incident in 2018, the Mizo youth and civil society organizations had requested the Union government to constitute a boundary commission to demarcate the boundary.
    • But no decision was taken by the Union government in this regard.
    • Apart from Mizoram, other states in the Northeast are also embroiled in border disputes with Assam. The longest and the bloodiest of these is the border dispute between Assam and Nagaland.

    What are the reasons behind the Assam-Mizoram border dispute and Inter-State border tensions?

    (1) Fault lines created by Britishers in boundary demarcation are still unaddressed

    • They created boundaries as per their commercial interests. In the process, sensitivities of local communities regarding land were either ignored or suppressed.
    • Origin: The border dispute can trace its origins to the demarcation of Lushai Hills from the Cachar plains by the British in 1875. The British had drawn the boundary in consultation with Mizo chiefs.
    • But in 1933, the boundary between Lushai Hills and the then princely state of Manipur was demarcated. Manipur boundary began from the tri-junction of Lushai Hills, Cachar district of Assam, and Manipur state.
    • The Mizos do not accept this demarcation and point to the 1875 boundary, which was drawn in consultation with their chiefs.
    • In the decades after Independence, states and UTs were carved out of Assam based on the 1933 line.
    • This includes Nagaland (1963), Arunachal Pradesh (1972, formerly NEFA), Meghalaya (1972) and Mizoram (1972).

    (2) Targeting migrants and outsiders

    • There has been a proliferation of political conversations that target migrants and “outsiders”.
    • This shrinks the space and scope for fluid borders and fixes the identities of people as per the region, to realize its cultural and economic potential.
    • Last year, volunteers of a Mizo student body started putting up checkpoints reportedly on the Assam side of the border.
    • They alleged that the descendants of the Lushai tribes were being denied their rightful home through increased encroachment by the Bangladeshi immigrants.
    • These checkpoints even prevented Assam government forest officials from carrying out their routine movements.

    (3) Failure of the constitutional machinery empowered to de-escalate tensions at the border

    • The presence of central paramilitary forces should have helped maintain the peace, but it didn’t happen.
    • Further, both the states are ruled by allies of the central government. However, the political leadership failed to preserve peace in the region.

    (4) Economic competition for land and scarcity of non-farm jobs

    Economic competition for land, engendered by a lack of non-farm jobs across the Northeast region, is also enhancing bitterness among states. Most of the population is dependent on agriculture and the rising population is putting pressure on available land.

    (5) Transportation of illegal drugs

    Other issues that complicate the situation on the border include the transportation of illegal drugs that travel via Mizoram to Assam and other parts of the country.

    How such incidents impact on North-East relationship?

    • Assam-Mizoram border dispute has the grave potential of disintegrating the cohesive regional relationship – politically, socially, and economically harboured by states for long.
    • Augments Trust Deficit: It hinders the probability of Interstate cooperation in the future due to enhanced trust deficit. This is testified by competing claims on the issue.
    • Increases Hatred in masses: Such instances tend to increase feelings of animosity between the residents of Mizoram and Assam. This will hamper India’s unity and integrity.
    • China factor and risk to national security: China will be watching these fights with relish. The state which feels more betrayed can be manipulated by China for its vested interests.
    • Domino Effect: If prudent action is not taken and violators are not duly punished, then such clashes will be seen on other disputed borders in the northeast region.

    Need for the Interstate Boundary Commission

    • Considering the contesting claims of both the parties and the complexity of the issue, the foremost priority in working out a solution should be the institution of an Independent Interstate boundary commission.
    • After a careful consultative study, the commission should ideally formulate a solution that is considerate of all the stakeholders’ concerns.
    • One option could be the utilization of the disputed lands by the central government after compensating both the states.
    • Alternatively, an option of compensating one state and awarding land to the other or awarding the disputed land to both the states concerned equally could be considered as per stakeholders’ acknowledgement.
    • Whatever be the solution once worked out and accepted by the states, the Court could play a role of a guardian and take serious note of its arbitrary acts.

    What can be done to bring the situation under control?

    • There is no sure-shot and quick solution possible to the border disputes between various states without a spirit of give and take, and a civic engagement brokered by the Union government.
    • The state leaders must nurture the peace, put in place institutional mechanisms to prevent breakdowns, and negotiate a way out of long-standing disputes.
    • The central government should use the opportunity to settle once and for all, the boundary disputes among states in North East India.
    • The whole stretch of reserve forests has to be freed of encroachments from either side.
    • The Home Ministry must ensure that the Assam-Mizoram border situation should first be subject to de-escalation and then return to the status quo.
    • The Constitution’s mechanisms for addressing inter-state disputes should be duly used. This includes activating an Inter-State Council (Article 263) or asking the Supreme Court to adjudicate (Article 131).
    • Further, a time-bound court-monitored commission involving local communities in joint demarcation exercises should be announced.

    Other boundary issues in North-East India

    During British rule, Assam included present-day Nagaland, Arunachal Pradesh and Meghalaya besides Mizoram, which became separate states one by one. Currently, Assam has boundary problems with each of them.

    Assam-Nagaland

    • Nagaland shares a 500-km boundary with Assam. It achieved statehood in December 1963 and was formed out of the Naga Hills district of Assam and Arunachal Pradesh (then North-East Frontier Agency).
    • Violent clashes and armed conflicts, marked by killings, have occurred on the Assam-Nagaland border since 1965. The boundary dispute is in the Supreme Court.

    Assam-Arunachal Pradesh

    • Both states have a boundary of over 800 km. Arunachal Pradesh was granted statehood by the State of Arunachal Pradesh Act, 1986 in 1987.
    • Clashes were first reported in 1992 and since then, there have been several accusations of illegal encroachment from both sides, and intermittent clashes.
    • This boundary issue is also being heard by the Supreme Court.

    Assam-Meghalaya

    • The 884-km boundary between the two states also witnesses flare-ups.
    • Meghalaya came into existence as an autonomous state within the state of Assam in April 1970 comprising the United Khasi & Jaintia Hills and the Garo Hills districts.
    • In 1972, it got statehood. As per Meghalaya government statements, today there are 12 areas of dispute between the two states.

    Way forward

    • It is important for both the states to accept that any conflict resolution measures involve compromises and sacrifices for the larger good.
    • The intervention of the Ministry of Home affairs by ordering central forces to all areas of disputed land until a lasting and amicable solution is reached should be respected in letter and spirit.
    • Satellite mapping of the actual border locations can be used to settle boundary disputes between the states.
    • Reviving the Inter-state council can be an option for the resolution of an Inter-state dispute.
    • Under Article 263 of the Constitution, the Inter-state council is expected to inquire and advise on disputes, discuss subjects common to all states and make recommendations for better policy coordination.
    • Similarly, Zonal councils need to be revived to discuss the matters of common concern to states in each zone—matters relating to social and economic planning, border disputes, inter-state transport, etc.
    • Ethos of cooperative federalism need to be imbibed by both the center and state governments to maintain and further increase the unity of India.
  • Resolving the Assam-Mizoram issue

    Context

    The violent stand-off between the Assam and Mizoram armed policemen at Vairengte in Mizoram, on July 26, took six lives and left over 50 injured is the culmination of a long-standing border dispute.

    History of the boundary issue

    • The ‘inner line’ boundary of the Lushai hills was ‘fixed’ in 1875 on the southern border of Assam’s Cachar district.
    • In line with the colonial practice of ‘fixing’ borders, this boundary was however not ‘precise’ as it was drawn largely using natural markers such as rivers and hills.
    • In post-independent India, the Mizoram government has accepted this boundary in preference over the subsequent revisions made by the colonial government.
    • There was a change in boundary when the Inner Line Permit under the Bengal Eastern Frontier Regulation, 1873 was extended to the Lushai hills district in 1930 and 1933.
    • The Mizoram government perceives that the boundary instituted by these revisions amounted to unilateral superimposition.
    • These revisions are also seen to conspicuously fail to recognise the Mizo’s long-standing historical rights to use the un-demarcated southern border of Cachar as their hunting ground, for jhum cultivation, and as sites of their resource extraction including rubber and timber.
    • However, considering that borders cannot be driven by perception but by institutionalised rules and laws, Assam’s government continues to refuse to accept Mizoram’s standpoint.
    • The Assam government considers Mizo plantation and settlements in the Inner Line Reserve Forest areas as an ‘encroachment’.

    People-centric Vs. State-centric approach in dispute

    • At the heart of this dispute is the contending approaches of the Assam and Mizoram governments to ‘borders’, namely ‘state-centric and ‘people-centric approaches.
    • The Assam government represent a continuum of the colonial ‘state-centric’ approach to borders which gives premium to legal, juridical and administrative recognition and protection of the border.
    • The Mizoram government advocate a ‘people-centric approach seeks to give a premium to the historical and traditional rights of the local indigenous people.
    • The Mizoram government also advocate the principle of uti possidetis juris (‘as you possess under law’, including customary law) on the other hand.

    Way forward

    • Historical context: Fixing the Assam-Mizoram border and resolve the dispute need to be sensitive to the historical context.
    • Deep historical knowledge, sensitivity and an accommodative spirit need to inform dialogue and negotiation under the neutral supervision of the Centre.
    • Inter-governmental forum: It is about time that the Centre sets up a permanent inter-governmental forum to involve important stakeholders in order to effectively manage border and territorial conflicts.
    • Quick-fix solution should be avoided: Any quick-fix solution driven by temporal electoral considerations should be avoided if we were to resuscitate and sustain interdependent Assam-Mizoram borders and beyond.

    Conclusion

    The resolution should be sensitive to the possibility of fluid and overlapping sovereignty, where forest ‘commons’ are seen not simply as sites of revenue-extraction but as powerful symbols of identity and sustainable livelihood resources for the local people.

  • (LIVE NOW) IAS Marathon session by Rohit sir | YOU Pick The Subject And WE Will Teach You, For FREE! | New IAS sessions today – Mid-night MCQ, Ethics and more(Link inside)

    (LIVE NOW) IAS Marathon session by Rohit sir | YOU Pick The Subject And WE Will Teach You, For FREE! | New IAS sessions today – Mid-night MCQ, Ethics and more(Link inside)

    Current affairs, static, CSAT, Optionals, Ethics and Essays

    Dear aspirants,

    We welcome you to join this unique opportunity of learning. At Habitat, we are providing FREE complete learning sessions by our experienced mentors on every UPSC topic. You do not have to pay a single rupee! 

    Just join in, select the subject you want to study, and start engaging with our mentors immediately!

    What do you have to do?

    1. Join Habitat for absolutely FREE by clicking here.
    2. Go through the discussions going on in the GENERAL channel.
    3. PICK the topic YOU would like to learn more about.
    4. Join that discussion.
    5. Read, participate, ask questions, and clarify doubts instantly!

    And more…

    Learn What You Want To Learn! It’s FREE!

    Here is a list of topics and discussions you can join immediately:

    Morning Current affairs Prashanth6:30 am
    MPQ via MCQs Addya Rai9:00 pm
    Revise Economics for IAS PrelimsRavi Ranjan11:00 am
    English WritingAnand Prakash12:30 pm
    Science and TechDr. Keerti1:00 pm
    Samadhan CSATRavi Ranjan2:00 pm
    Geography through mapsSandip More4:00 pm
    Chat pe News: Current AffairsAnjum Sharma4:30 pm
    Polity Laxmikant Amoghavarsha5:30 pm
    Indian society and Social IssuesSiddharth 6:00 pm
    Abhyaas: Answer WritingGarima7:00 pm
    Samvad: Indian AgricultureRadhika Didwania7:30 pm
    UPSC MCQsJoshua8:00 pm
    IAS Marathon Rohit Yadav9:00 pm
    Ethics simplifiedShubham9:15 pm
    IAS MCQsIshika9:30 pm
    Midnight MCQs and revisionPreeti12:00

    And many more…

    Whatever you need, we have it here

    How to join a discussion?

    After you have joined/registered on Habitat for free, go to General club. Click on the blue box of the session you want to attend.

  • Free Webinar by First  Attempt UPSC Topper || Arnav Shivendu, AIR 283 || My Love for Civil Services and How to Clear the Exam in First Attempt

    Free Webinar by First Attempt UPSC Topper || Arnav Shivendu, AIR 283 || My Love for Civil Services and How to Clear the Exam in First Attempt

    Webinar Date: 8th August

    Time: 7 PM

    You and I share the same love and the same dream…to become an IAS officer. But that’s not all that we share. I also share with you the fear and anxiety that comes with this dream. 

    It’s the same struggle every day, isn’t it? 

    1. How do I complete the syllabus?
    2. How do I maintain consistency?
    3. What to study, what not to study?
    4. How do I manage my time?
    5. How do I complete my optionals?
    6. How do write better answers?
    7. How can I remember this all?
    8. How can I manage current affairs? Etc.

    It was the same for me. The same concern every day. I felt lost and overwhelmed too. And I totally understand what you are going through right now!

    But, here’s the thing – All of these are SOLVABLE PROBLEMS!

    You CAN learn how to manage your syllabus, you CAN learn to manage your time, you CAN learn how to write good answers. All you need is the right support and guidance. For example – I too was inconsistent with my studies. But then I broke down the syllabus into small pieces. I prioritised the topics. And my mentors helped me frame a schedule that matched my learning pace. That’s it! With such a small change I was able to bring more consistency in my studies.

    And that’s exactly what I want to share with you. What are the small changes that you can make? What kind of schedule you can keep? Where can you look for the right study materials? Etc. And I would like you to learn from my experience so that your journey is smoother than mine.

    Quite frankly, I am inviting you to share my experiences with you. I would like to share the mistakes I made and how I corrected them. I am hoping that you would learn from these experiences and clear the exam on your first attempt!

    Remember, you can definitely clear this exam and I would like to share everything I learned with you. Do join me on the webinar at 7 P.M. on 8th August, and we can solve the problems together.

    About The Webinar Host:

    The Webinar is being hosted by a civil service officer Arnav Shivendu who cleared his exam in his first attempt in 2019 with AIR 283.

  • Important British Commissions and Committees

    06th Aug, 2021

    Educational Commissions

    (1) Charles Wood Despatch – 1854
    • Objective: Wood’s despatch proposed several recommendations in order to improve the system of education.
    • According to the recommendations, it was declared that the aim of the Government’s policy was the promotion of western education. In his despatch, he emphasized on the education of art, science, philosophy and literature of Europe.
    • In short, the propagation of European knowledge was the motto of the Wood’s Despatch.
    • According to the despatch, for higher education, the chief medium of instruction would be English.
    • However, the significance of the vernacular language was no less emphasized as Wood believed that through the mediums of vernacular language, European knowledge could reach to the masses.
    • Wood’s Despatch also proposed the setting up of several vernacular primary schools in the villages at the lowest stage.
    • Moreover, there should be Anglo-Vernacular high schools and an affiliated college in the district level.
    • Wood’s Despatch recommended a system of grants-in-aid to encourage and foster the private enterprise in the field of education.
    • The grants-in-aid were conditional on the institution employing qualified teachers and maintaining proper standards of teaching.

    (2) Hunter Commission – 1882

    • Appointed by: Viceroy Lord Ripon
    • Objective: Hunter Education Commission was a landmark commission with objectives to look into the complaints of the non-implementation of the Wood’s Despatch of 1854; the contemporary status of elementary education in the British territories; and suggests means by which this can be extended and improved.
    • Headed by: Sir William Wilson Hunter
    • He submitted its report in 1882.

    Commission suggestions:

    1. There should be two types of education arrangements at the high school level, in which emphasis should be given on giving a vocational and business education and other such literary education should be given, which will help in admission to the university.
    2. Arrangement for emphasis on the importance of education at the primary level and education in local language and useful subjects.
    3. Private efforts should be welcomed in the field of education, but primary education should be given without him.
    4. Control of education at the primary level should be handed over to the district and city boards.

    (3) Hunter Commission of 1882 on Primary Education:

    • Primary education should be regarded as the education of the masses. Education should be able to train the people for self-dependence.
    • The medium of instruction in primary education should be the mother tongue. Normal Schools should be established for the training of teachers.
    • The curriculum should include useful subjects like agriculture, elements of natural and physical science and the native method of arithmetic and measurement, etc.
    • The spread of primary education for the tribal and backward people should be the responsibility of the Government.
    • Fees should be an example to students on the basis of their financial difficulties.

    (4) Raleigh Commission – 1902

    • Appointed under: Raleigh Commission was appointed under the presidency of Sir Thomas Raleigh on 27 January 1902.
    • Objective: To inquire into the condition and prospects of universities in India and to recommend proposals for improving their constitution and working.
    • Evidently, the Commission was precluded from reporting on primary or secondary education.
    • As a result of the report of the recommendations of the Commission the Indian Universities Act was passed in 1904.
    • The main objective of the Act: to improve the condition of education in India and upgrade the system to a better level

    Important changes introduced for the upliftment of University Education:

    1. Universities were empowered to appoint their own staff including the teaching staff.
    2. The number of Fellows of a University was limited within 50 to 100.
    3. The number of elected Fellows was fixed at 20 for the Bombay, Madras and Calcutta Universities and 15 for others.
    4. The Governor-General was now empowered to decide a University’s territorial limits and also affiliation between the universities and colleges.
    5. After the implementation of the provisions of the University Act, though the number of colleges declined, yet the number of students increased considerably.

    Government Resolution on Education Policy (1913)

    • In 1906, the progressive state of Baroda introduced compulsory primary education throughout its territories. In its 1913
    • Resolution on Education Policy, the government refused to take up the responsibility of compulsory education, but accepted the policy of removal of illiteracy and urged provincial governments to take early steps to provide free elementary education to the poorer and more backward sections.
    Timeline: Vernacular education development in India

    (5) Sadler Commission – 1917

    • In 1917, the Calcutta University Commission (Sadler Commission) was appointed by the Government of India under the Chairmanship of Mr. Michel Sadler, the Vice-Chancellor of the University of Leeds.

    Recommendations:

    1. All the teaching resources in the city of Calcutta should be organized so that the Calcutta University may become entirely a teaching university.
    2. A separate teaching and residential university should be established at Dacca.
    3. There was a need for a coordinating agency. Hence an inter-University Board should be set up.
    4. Honors courses should be instituted and they should be distinctly different from the Pass courses.
    5. Full time and salaried Vice-Chancellor should be appointed to be the administrative head of the university.
    6. The Senate and the syndicate should be replaced by the Court and the Executive Council respectively.
    7. Universities should be freed from excessive official control.
    8. Government interference in the academic matters of universities should stop.

    (6) Hartog Commission – 1929

    • Sir Philip Joseph Hartog committee was appointed by the British Indian government to survey on the growth of education in India.
    • The Hartog committee (1929), had devoted more attention to mass education than the secondary and University education.
    • The Hartog committee highlighted the problem of wastage and stagnation in education at the primary level.
    • It recommended the policy of consolidation instead of multiplication of schools. The duration of the primary course was to be fixed to four years.
    • It recommended for the improvements in quality, pay, and service conditions of teachers and relating the syllabus and teaching methods to the local environment of villages and locality
    • The Hartog committee on education recommended for the promotion of technical and commercial education by universities to control the problem of unemployment.
    • The recommendation of the Hartog committee of 1929 was an attempt for consolidation and stabilization of education. The Hartog committee of 1929 was seen as a torchbearer of the government’s effort to improve the quality of education.
    • However, these recommendations of Hartog committee of 1929 remained only on paper and could not be implemented due to the great economic depression of 1930-31.

    (7) Sargent Plan – 1944

    • The Sargent plan of education came after Sir John Sargent was given the task to prepare a comprehensive scheme of education for India in 1944.

    Recommendations:

    1. Pre-primary education for children between 3 to 6 years of age. Universal, compulsory and free primary or basic education for all children between the ages 6—11 (junior basic) and 11—14 (senior basic).
    2. High school education for six years for selected children between the years 11—17.
    3. Degree course for three years beginning after the higher secondary examination for selected students
    4. Technical, commercial, agricultural and art education for full time and part-time students, girls schools are to teach domestic science.
    5. The liquidation of adult illiteracy and the development of a public library system in about 20 years.
    6. Full provision for the proper training of teachers.
    7. Educational provision is made for the physically and mentally handicapped children.
    8. The organization of compulsory physical education.
    9. Provision to be made for social and recreational activities.
    10. The creation of employment bureaus.
    11. The creation of the Department of Education in the centre and in the states.
    12. The use of mother tongue is to be used as the medium of instruction in all high schools.

    Famine Commissions during British Rule in India

    (1) Campbell Commission
    • In 1865-66, a famine engulfed Orissa, Bengal, Bihar, and Madras and took a toll of nearly 20 lakhs of lives with Orissa alone loosing 10 lakh lives, since the famine was most severe in Orissa; it is called the Orissa famine.
    • The Government officers though forewarned took no steps to meet the calamity.
    • The Government adhered to the principles of free trade and the law of demand and supply, the Government did provide employment to the table booked men leaving the work of charitable relief to the voluntary agency.
    • But the famine proved a turning point in the history of Indian famines for it was followed by the appointment of a committee under the chairmanship of Sir George Campbell.

    (2) Stratchy Commission

    • It was set up in 1878 under the Chairmanship of Sir Richard Strachey.
    • The commission recommended state interference in food trade in the event of famine. India witnessed another major famine in 1896-97.

    (3) Lyall Commission

    • It was constituted in 1897 under the Chairmanship of Sir James Lyall. This commission recommended the development of irrigation facilities.

    (4) MacDonnell Commission

    • It was set up in 1900 under the Chairmanship of Sir Anthony (Later Lord) McDonnel to re-evaluate and recommend changes in report of the previous commission, based on the findings of the recent famine.
    • This Commission recommended that the official machinery dealing with a famine must work around the year so that the scarcity of food grains could be controlled well in time.

    Law Commission

    • Law Commissions in India have a pre-independence origin. The first Law Commission was formed in 1834 as a result of the Charter Act, 1833 under the chairmanship of TB Macaulay.
    • The first commission’s recommendations resulted in the codification of the penal code and the Criminal Procedure Code.
    • Three other law commissions were constituted before independence by the British government.
    • All four pre-independent law commissions have contributed to the statute books immensely.
    • After independence, the first Law Commission was constituted in 1955 in a continuance of the tradition of bringing law reforms in the country through the medium of law commissions.
    • Second Pre-Independence Law Commission,1853 – Sir John Romilly.
    • Third Pre-Independence Law Commission, 1862- Sir John Romilly.
    • Fourth Pre-Independence Law Commission, 1879 – Dr Whitley Stokes.

    Currency Commission

    (1) Mansfield Commission by Dufferin in 1886
    • The Indian Currency Committee or Fowler Committee was a government committee appointed by the British-run Government of India on 29 April 1898 to examine the current situation in India.
    • Until 1892, silver was the metal on which Indian currency and coinage had largely been based. In 1892, the Government of India announced its intent to “close Indian mints to silver” and, in 1893, it brought this policy into force.

    Other Commissions on Currency:

    1. Fowler Commission by Elgin II in 1898
    2. Babington Smith Commission by Chelmsford in 1919
    3. Hilton Young Commission by Linlithgow in 1926

    Other Important Commissions

    1. Scott-Moncrieff Commission (Irrigation) by Curzon in 1901
    2. Fraser Commission (Police Reforms) by Curzon in 1902
    3. Hunter Commission (Punjab Disturbances) by Chelmsford 1919
    4. Butler Commission (Indian States relation with British Crown) by Irwin in 1927
    5. Whiteley Commission (Labour) by Irwin in 1929
    6. Sapru Commission (Unemployment) by Linlithgow in 1935
    7. Chalfield Commission (Army) by Linlighgow 1939
    8. Floud Commission (Tenancy in Bengal) by Linlighgow in 1940

  • Streak Daily Initiative: Question Hour – Day 11

    Questions for the Day:

    Try these Mains Questions :

    Q: Discuss the constitutional provisions relating to the non justiciable directives binding upon the states. (10)

    Q: ‘Essentially all that is contained in Part IV A of the constitution is just a codification of tasks integral to the Indian way of life.’ Critically discuss. (15 Marks)

    Try these Prelims Questions :

    Q1. Which of the following statements given below is/are correct?
    1. While Fundamental Rights aim at establishing political democracy in the country, the DPSPs aim at establishing social and economic democracy in the country. 


    2. While Fundamental Rights have legal sanctions, the DPSPs have moral and political sanctions. 

    3. DPSPs can get priority over Fundamental rights if it is in interest of economic rights of people.

    Select the correct answer using the codes given below

    A. 1 and 2only

    B. 2 and 3 only

    C. 1 and 3 only

    D. All of them

    Q2. Consider the following statements:

    With reference to the Constitution of India, the Directive Principles of State Policy constitute limitations upon

    1. legislative function.

    2. executive function.

    Which of the above statements is/are correct?

    (a) 1 only

    (b) 2 only

    (c) Both 1 and 2

    (d) Neither 1 nor 2

    Q3. Which of the following DPSPs given below were not originally present in the constitution and were added subsequently?
    1. Provide free Legal aid to poor
    2. To take steps to secure the participation of workers in the management of industries
    3. To protect and improve the environment and to safeguard forests and wild life 

    4. Provision for early childhood care and education to children below the age of six years

    Select the correct answer using the codes given below

    A. 1, 2 and 2 only

    B. 2 ,3 and 4 only

    C. 1, 3  and 4 only

    D. All of them

    Q4. Which of the following is/are among Directive Principles of State Policy?

    1. The State shall strive to promote science and technology for development.

    2. The State shall endeavor to secure for citizens a Uniform Civil Code throughout India.

    3. The State shall try to develop population policy and family

    planning programmes.

    4. The State shall take steps to promote tourism.

    Select the correct answer using the codes given below:

    (a) 1 and 3

    (b) 2 and 4

    (c) 2 only

    (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4

    Q5. Consider the following statements about Fundamental duties:

    1. Have always been a part of the Constitution of India

    2. Have been added through an amendment

    3. Sawaran Singh committee recommended fundamental duties to be mandatory on all citizens of India

    4. Enjoyment of rights under Part-iv is dependent on obedience to fundamental duties

    Which of these statements is/are correct?

    (a) Only 1 and 3

    (b) Only 3 and 4

    (c) Only 2

    (d) Only 2 and 4

    Q6. Consider the following statements:

    The fundamental duties provided in the constitution are:

    1. To protect the sovereignty, unity and integrity of India

    2. To safeguard private property

    3. To protect and improve the natural environment 

    Of these statements:

    (a) 1, 2 and 3 are correct

    (b) 1 and 2 are correct

    (c) 2 and 3 are correct

    (d) 1 and 3 are correct

    Sukanya madam’s video would be out at 7:00 PM and Santosh sir would provide the video at 9:00 PM.

    Watch this space for more updates exclusively for you.

  • State of food insecurity

    Context

    The latest edition of the State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World (SOFI) report, released jointly by five UN organisations in July, reveals that the pandemic and failure on the part of state to combat its effects, has led to a significant increase in the prevalence of hunger and food insecurity in the country.

    About the report

    • Estimates on food insecurity presented in the SOFI report are based on two globally-accepted indicators of food insecurity:
    • 1) The Prevalence of Undernourishment (PoU), which estimates the proportion of people suffering from chronic deficiency of calories.
    • 2) A more recently developed an experience-based indicator called the Prevalence of Moderate and Severe Food Insecurity (PMSFI).
    • The PoU estimates are based on estimates of per-capita supply of food and distributional parameters estimated using the national consumption surveys
    • On the other hand, PMSFI estimates are based on data collected through surveys that attempt to capture people’s experiences of food insecurity (such as eating less, modifying diet to eat cheaper food etc).
    • No assessment of food insecurity during a pandemic: The PMSFI estimates presented in the report are particularly important because, since the outbreak of the pandemic, the Indian government has not undertaken any official assessment of food insecurity in the country.
    • Not only has the government not conducted its own consumption or food security surveys, it does not approve the publication of results based on the Gallup World Poll.
    • As a result, estimates for India are not published in the SOFI reports.
    • However, these can still be obtained indirectly because the data are presented for South Asia and for “South Asia (excluding India)”.
    • Estimates for India can be obtained by comparing the two sets of data.

    What the report says

    • According to the data presented in the report, the prevalence of moderate to severe food insecurity in India rose by about 6.8 percentage points in 2018-20.
    • Data show that there were about 43 crore of moderate to severe food-insecure people in India in 2019.
    • As a result of the pandemic-related disruptions, this increased to 52 crore in one year.
    • In terms of prevalence rates, moderate to severe food insecurity increased from about 31.6 per cent in 2019 to 38.4 per cent in 2021.

    Causes of food insecurity in India

    • Economic distress: The problems of hunger and food insecurity are grave in India because of widespread economic distress, high unemployment and high levels of inequality.
    • Dependence on informal economy: A large proportion of the poor is dependent on the informal economy in which incomes are too low and uncertain.
    • Unemployment: Unemployment rates have risen sharply over the last few years, shrinking public investment and the economic slowdown have compounded the distress among working classes and the peasantry.
    • With low and uncertain incomes, families dependent on the informal economy do not have assured access to adequate and nutritious food.

    Way forward

    • Monitoring system: There is an urgent need for the government to establish systems for regular monitoring of the food security situation in the country.
    • Universal access to food: It is ironic that the country with the largest stock of grain in the world — 120 million tonnes as of July 1, 2021 — accounts for a quarter of the world’s food-insecure population.
    • Universalising access to the public distribution system is the need of the hour at least during the pandemic.

    Conclusion

    The increasing severity of food insecurity in India points to the urgent need for measures by the government to ensure the right to food of citizens of India.

  • What changed for Indian industry after 1991 economic reforms?

    Context

    It has been 30 years since the spirit of liberalisation was unleashed in 1991 economic reforms. The private sector, which had been seen very differently up to 1990, was placed at the centre of the reform process. And this has continued and grown since then.

    Challenges and opportunities for Indian industry after economic reforms

    1) Entry of MNCs and centrality to consumers

    • The first challenge was the entry of MNCs through the joint venture (JV) route.
    • Centrality to consumers: The reforms gave centrality to the consumer who till 1991 did not have a choice.
    • The Indian consumer was given choices and companies, both foreign and Indian, wanted to be their first choice.
    • Growth in demand: The surge of new demand from the marketplace transformed the scenario, reflected in GDP growth rapidly moving up to 7 per cent per annum.

    2) Increased competition

    • For the first time, Indian companies faced real competition from other Indian as well as foreign companies.
    • But, many corporates restructured themselves and transformed into competitive forces.
    • The new reality of reduced customs duties and industrial licensing disappearing, removed the protection umbrella and Indian companies, by and large, who had been planning for this day, were ready to face this challenge.

    3) Government-industry partnership

    • Till June 1991, the government and industry were at a distance from each other.
    • June 1991 changed all of that, the government’s dialogue with industry deepened, consultations were frequent.
    • Feedback on what was happening on the ground was taken regularly.
    • A government-industry partnership became a reality.

    4) Boost to aspiration of industries

    • The most significant change brought about by the reforms pertained to the level of “aspirations” of the industry.
    • There was excitement and ambition to be world-class.
    • Rise of IT industry: In this, the IT industry led by TCS, Infosys and Wipro played a major role.
    • They showed that Indian engineers and managers were the best in the world.
    • They exuded confidence which spread to others.

    5) Boost to entrepreneurship

    • Not just the big industry, but also, the small and medium sectors that became part of the new energy in industry.
    • Component manufacturing and exports were new initiatives from ancillaries and suppliers of major manufacturers.

    6) Infrastructure

    • The public sector had a monopoly over infrastructure.
    • This changed and the private sector was invited to participate, to get into public-private partnerships and end the government’s monopoly.

    7) Birth of new private sector bank

    • Banking had been nationalised in 1969.
    • But the reforms of 1991 gave birth to a new private sector bank — HDFC Bank — which, after due diligence by the government and the Reserve Bank of India, opened its doors in 1994.
    • This was a huge step forward in the reform process.

    8) Improvement in corporate governance

    • An industry-led initiative brought out the first-ever task force guidelines and report on corporate governance.
    • This was followed by many other actions and policies.

    Conclusion

    There is still a long way to go, but the die that was cast in 1991 has led to a new tsunami of change.

  • Centre moves to redact Retrospective Tax Law

    The government took the first step towards doing away with the contentious retrospective tax law of 2012, which was used to raise large tax demands on foreign investors like Vodafone and Cairn Energy.

    Retrospective Tax Law: A backgrounder

    • The roots of this law date back to 2007, when Vodafone bought over a majority stake in the telecom operations of Hutch in India for $11.1 billion.
    • While the deal involved the changing of hands of Indian operations of Hutch, the companies party to it were registered outside India and all the paperwork and financial transactions, too, were done outside the country.
    • But the Indian government ruled that Vodafone was liable to pay capital gains tax to it as the deal involved the transfer of assets located in India.
    • Importantly, there was no rule in the Indian statutes then that allowed such taxation.
    • Vodafone challenged this claim and the case went to Supreme Court, which ruled in 2012 that there was no tax liability on Vodafone’s part to Indian authorities.

    What was the law made then?

    • In 2012, Parliament amended the Finance Act to enable the taxman to impose tax claims retrospectively for deals executed after 1962 which involved the transfer of shares in a foreign entity whose assets were located in India.
    • The target, of course, was the Vodafone deal. Very soon, tax claims were also raised on Cairn Energy.

    How did the Companies react?

    • The changes to the Finance Act allowed India to reimpose its tax demand on Vodafone.
    • Tax authorities had slapped a tax bill of Rs 7,990 crore on Vodafone, saying the company should have deducted the tax at source before making a payment to Hutchison.
    • By 2016, reports say, the bill had risen to Rs 22,100 crore after adding interest and penalty.
    • The demand on Cairn was for Rs 10,247 crore in back taxes over its move, beginning in 2006, to bring its Indian assets under a single holding company called Cairn India Ltd.
    • A few years later, when Cairn India Ltd floated an IPO to divest about 30 per cent of its ownership of the company, mining conglomerate Vedanta picked up most of the shares.
    • However, Cairn UK was not allowed to transfer its stakes as Indian officials held that the company had to first clear the tax liability.

    Note: This story is of no use to aspirants. But one must understand how such cases create regression for the Indian economy in the long run.

    A case in the Hague

    • That prompted Cairn UK to move the Permanent Court of Arbitration to The Hague, Netherlands.
    • It said that India had violated the terms of the India-UK Bilateral Investment Treaty by imposing a retrospective tax due on it.
    • The treaty provides protection against arbitrary decisions by laying down that India would treat investment from the UK in a “fair and equitable” manner.
    • Vodafone, too, had sought arbitration before the Permanent Court of Arbitration, citing the “fair and equitable” treatment clause in the India-Netherlands BIT.

    India’s response

    • In September last year, the Hague court ruled in favour of Vodafone, quashing India’s tax claim after holding that it violated the “equitable and fair treatment standard” under the bilateral investment treaty.
    • India refused to pay the compensation, Cairn launched recovery proceedings across countries as part of which a French court ordered the freezing of some Indian assets in Paris.
    • This move discourages foreign investors from coming to India and that the Centre should look to resolve the case at the earliest.
    • The amendments now mooted are designed to do just that.

    Taxation Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2021

    • The Bill offers to drop tax claims against companies on deals before May 2012 that involve the indirect transfer of Indian assets would be “on fulfilment of specified conditions”.

    Various conditions:

    • The condition includes the withdrawal of pending litigation and the assurance that no claim for damages would be filed.
    • As per the proposed changes, any tax demand made on transactions that took place before May 2012 shall be dropped, and any taxes already collected shall be repaid, albeit without interest.
    • To be eligible, the concerned taxpayers would have to drop all pending cases against the government and promise not to make any demands for damages or costs.

    Why is the amendment necessary?

    • The retrospective taxation was termed “tax terrorism”.
    • It is argued that such retrospective amendments militate against the principle of tax certainty and damage India’s reputation as an attractive destination.
    • This could help restore India’s reputation as a fair and predictable regime apart from helping put an end to taxation.

More posts