Mains Ready By December. Smash Mains & Smash PYQ Admissions Open
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Search results for: “”

  • Naga leaders agree to open key Manipur highway after talks with Centre in Assam

    Why in the News

    The United Naga Council has agreed to lift its economic blockade of Manipur’s national highways temporarily, after tripartite talks with the Centre and the State government in Assam. The lifting rests only on a promise that its demands will be addressed, after more than three months of cut supplies.

    What is an economic blockade, and why does it bite in Manipur?

    1. What it is: An economic blockade is an obstruction of road traffic by a community body, not the State, so there is no order to revoke.
    2. Why Manipur is exposed: The State is landlocked and almost everything it consumes arrives by road, mainly National Highway 2 from Imphal to Dimapur.
    3. Which roads were closed: Goods traffic stopped on National Highways 2, 37, 202 and 102A.
    4. How it escalated: The blockade began on 11 June and the Council made it indefinite on 9 September.
    5. The takeaway: A blockade on a State with one supply corridor pressures the government by cutting off the population first, the protesters’ neighbours included.

    What is the United Naga Council demanding?

    1. Killing of six civilians: Six Naga civilians from Leilon Vaiphei village were abducted and killed in May, which set off the blockade.
    2. Revoke the ceasefire: The Council wants the Suspension of Operations ceasefire with Kuki armed groups revoked. That arrangement has held through the ethnic conflict since May 2023.
    3. Removal of a minister and prosecution: The Council also wants Deputy Chief Minister Nemcha Kipgen removed and justice for the six men killed, with every demand met first.
    4. Kamjong killings raised: The Council raised the recent killing of four Naga civilians in Kamjong district. The government promised to maintain law and order.

    What did the blockade do to the State?

    1. Shortages in the Imphal Valley: The Imphal Valley ran short of medicines, baby food, fresh produce and fuel as consignments stopped moving.
    2. Black market prices: Petrol sold for as much as Rs 250 a litre in the black market and a cooking gas cylinder for up to Rs 5,000.
    3. Hill districts also cut off: Kuki Zo districts depend on routes through Naga areas, so Kangpokpi, Churachandpur, Tengnoupal and Pherzawl ran short of goods and medical supplies.

    Why did the talks move now?

    1. Tripartite talks in Assam: The Council met the Union Ministry of Home Affairs and the State government at the Border Security Force frontier headquarters in Garbhanga, Assam.
    2. Earlier rounds had failed: Talks with the Chief Minister at Senapati broke down on 8 July. A round on 10 August produced only an agreement to keep talking.
    3. Concession in the parallel talks: The Centre agreed to Union Minister level participation in the Naga Peace Process, the separate Naga settlement talks long sought by the National Socialist Council of Nagaland (Isak Muivah).
    4. No official word yet: Neither the Centre nor the State government has confirmed what was agreed.

    Challenges

    1. No enforceable end: The lifting is temporary and rests only on a promise, so goods traffic can be stopped again at any time.
    2. Revocation would remove a restraint: Ending the Suspension of Operations would free Kuki armed groups from camp confinement.
    3. Justice remains a demand: The killings that triggered the blockade have produced no announced outcome.

    Way Forward

    1. Put the demands on dates: The Union Ministry of Home Affairs should record each demand against a named authority and a response date.
    2. Prosecute the killings: Hand the May abductions to a court monitored investigation with a deadline for filing charges.
    3. Protect the supply line: Notify the highways feeding Manipur as essential supply routes, with a State plan to escort convoys.
    4. Widen the table: Bring Kuki Zo and Meitei bodies into the same format, since settling with one community shifts the blockade.

    Conclusion

    Trucks will move again, but every demand that stopped them stays open, so the State has bought supplies with a promise. Watch whether those demands are recorded against dates, because nothing else stands between Manipur and the next blockade.

    Back2Basics: Suspension of Operations agreement

    1. What it is: A tripartite ceasefire signed by the Centre, the State government and an armed group that gives up violence and accepts the Constitution.
    2. What it obliges: Cadres stay in designated camps, weapons are held in monitored storage, and the agreement runs for fixed terms.
    3. When it began in Manipur: The arrangement with Kuki Zo armed groups was first signed in 2008 and has been extended since.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2025, GS3, 15 marks] What are the major challenges to internal security and peace process in the North-Eastern States? Map the various peace accords and agreements initiated by the government in the past decade.”

  • External Affairs Minister tells UN General Assembly that bids to claim immunity for terrorism will not stand

    Why in the News

    India told the United Nations General Assembly that attempts to normalise terrorism and claim immunity from its consequences will not stand. Pakistan’s Prime Minister had raised Kashmir there a day earlier and called India’s suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty an act of war.

    What is the Indus Waters Treaty and why is it in abeyance?

    1. River division: The treaty divides the Indus basin rivers between India and Pakistan, working like a title deed over river water.
    2. Origin in Partition: Partition left the works feeding the canals in India and the irrigated land in Pakistan, so the two signed in 1960 with the World Bank as a signatory.
    3. What changed: India put the treaty in abeyance after the Pahalgam terror attack of April 2025, stopping performance without ending it. Revival needs Pakistan credibly ending cross border terrorism.
    4. The takeaway: India has tied Pakistan’s water share to ending terrorism, so a water settlement now turns on behaviour rather than geography.

    What did India put to the Assembly on terrorism?

    1. Serial practitioner charge: India named Pakistan a serial practitioner of terrorism.
    2. State sponsorship of terrorism: India called terrorism with state backing and cross border reach a direct affront to the global order, and said sponsoring governments must be held accountable.
    3. Self defence and terror financing: India said it will exercise self defence, that friendship cannot coexist with terrorism and that terror financing must be exposed.

    How did India answer the Kashmir claim?

    1. Right of Reply: India answered through the Right of Reply, a state’s short answer to another’s speech at the Assembly.
    2. Territorial position restated: India described Jammu and Kashmir as an Indian Union Territory, an integral and inalienable part of India.
    3. Plebiscite claim rejected: Pakistan asked the United Nations to deliver a plebiscite, a vote on which country a territory joins. India rejected that and the alleged demographic change.
    4. The counter charge: India recalled that the 9/11 mastermind lived beside Pakistan’s premier army academy, and said Pakistan claims to uphold security by day and carries out terrorism by night.
    5. Rights inside Pakistan: India pointed to killings in Rawalakot in Pakistan occupied Kashmir and to the treatment of minorities there.

    What does the weaponisation of everything mean?

    1. Weaponisation of everything: India used the phrase for economic links turned into instruments of pressure, so countries far from the West Asia, Russia Ukraine and Israel Gaza conflicts are penalised.
    2. Chokepoints in six domains: Extreme competition creates chokepoints, single points others must pass through, in finance, market access, supply chains, technology, resources and connectivity.
    3. Tariffs on Russian energy buyers: A new United States law authorises tariffs up to 100 per cent on Russian energy buyers, including India, so nations are de risking and diversifying.
    4. Global South and sea lanes: Developing countries face a 4F crisis, insecurity of food, fuel, fertiliser and finance. India has lost over 10 seafarers in the Strait of Hormuz and Black Sea.
    5. Stability, security and predictability: Peace is more than the absence of war, and weakens if stability, security or predictability is undermined.

    Challenges

    1. Abeyance has no treaty basis: The treaty carries no clause letting one side suspend it, so the step rests on political decision.
    2. Limited physical leverage: India lacks the storage and diversion capacity on the western rivers to change flows quickly.
    3. Assembly statements bind nobody: A General Assembly speech creates no obligation, so accountability depends on other forums.

    Way Forward

    1. Build what the treaty allows: Complete the storage and power projects the treaty already permits on the western rivers.
    2. Terror financing route: Take Pakistan’s record to the Financial Action Task Force, which grades countries on countering terror financing.
    3. Secure the sea lanes jointly: Expand naval escort cooperation and attack reporting with Indian Ocean partners.

    Conclusion

    The Assembly exchange has turned a water sharing treaty into counter terrorism pressure. Watch whether another member state adopts that condition, because pressure applied alone can be waited out.

    Back2Basics: Indus Waters Treaty

    1. Rivers to each side: The Ravi, Beas and Sutlej go to India, the Indus, Jhelum and Chenab to Pakistan.
    2. What India may still do: India may use the western rivers for non consumptive purposes, limited irrigation and run of the river power, which stores no water.
    3. How a dispute is settled: The Permanent Indus Commission handles questions first, differences go to a Neutral Expert and disputes to a Court of Arbitration.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2016, GS1, 12.5 marks] Present an account of the Indus Water Treaty and examine its ecological, economic and political implications in the context of changing bilateral relations.”

  • Union Minister says Jharkhand’s opposition to the MMDR Act facilitates coal theft

    Why in the News

    The Union Minister of Women and Child Development has said Jharkhand opposes the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment (MMDR) Act, 2026 to facilitate coal theft. Jharkhand’s Chief Minister calls it a black Bill.

    What does the MMDR Act, 2026 change?

    1. Uniform national levies: The amendment fixes mining taxes and levies nationally instead of State by State, like one national price list for every mine.
    2. Why it was brought: The stated aim is to streamline taxation under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and stop arbitrary State levies.
    3. What went wrong before: A mineral bearing State added fresh cesses, meaning charges on top of the main levy, after auctions closed, so bidders faced new demands.
    4. The takeaway: A bidder can now calculate the levy before bidding, and a mineral bearing State loses the one revenue lever it controlled alone.

    Why does the Centre say Jharkhand is resisting?

    1. Auctions not held on time: The State does not put mineral blocks to auction on schedule.
    2. Five intents alleged: The Centre’s charge names five intents behind the State’s opposition:
      • revenue kept from reaching the State exchequer;
      • mining administration kept dysfunctional;
      • facilities denied to licensed operators;
      • illegal activity allowed to rise;
      • a racket in illegal mining left to flourish.
    3. Coal theft as the motive: The opposition is put down to an interest in personal revenue rather than legitimate State revenue.
    4. Political messaging: The ruling Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM), Congress and Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) are accused of misleading people about the Act.

    What does the Centre say the State gains?

    1. Investment and jobs: Predictable levies are expected to draw mining investment and keep young people working within the State.
    2. States already applying it: Odisha, West Bengal, Chhattisgarh, Karnataka and Kerala have implemented the Act.
    3. Opposition ruled States included: Several of those are Congress ruled and welcome the Act, which weakens the claim that it targets Jharkhand.
    4. End of red tapism: The claim is that implementing the Act will end red tapism, meaning delays caused by layers of official permission.

    Why is this a question of federal power?

    1. Minerals belong to the State: Jharkhand’s ground is that minerals and land belong to the State, so the Centre should not decide its entitlements over them.
    2. Constitutional split of power: Entry 54 of the Union List lets Parliament regulate mines once it declares central regulation expedient. Entry 50 of the State List lets a State tax mineral rights.
    3. Court upheld the State levy: A nine judge Bench held in Mineral Area Development Authority v. Steel Authority of India (2024) that royalty is not a tax, so the State’s mineral levy stayed beyond challenge.
    4. What Jharkhand stands to lose: The State holds India’s largest coal resources, so a uniform central rate hits its own revenue hardest.

    Challenges

    1. State revenue capped from outside: A mineral bearing State can no longer raise its own levy when mining income falls short.
    2. Auctions still depend on the State: The Act fixes rates, not the pace at which a State puts blocks to auction.
    3. Enforcement stays with the State: Illegal mining is detected and prosecuted by State agencies, so a tax rule cannot stop coal theft.
    4. Past dues remain unsettled: Operators still carry demands raised under the old State cesses.

    Way Forward

    1. Compensate the lost headroom: Route a share of the central mining levy back to the producing State, on a Finance Commission formula.
    2. Publish an auction calendar: The Ministry of Mines should notify State wise auction dates, with missed blocks reverting to central auction.
    3. Close the old cess demands: Notify one settlement window for dues raised after past auctions.
    4. Use Article 263: Place mineral taxation before the Inter State Council, so a producing State’s objection is answered rather than litigated.

    Conclusion

    The quarrel is not about whether a mineral is taxed but about who fixes the charge on a mineral the State owns. Watch whether Jharkhand takes its objection to court, because refusal alone cannot stop a central levy.

    Back2Basics: Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957

    1. Scope of the Act: The Act regulates mineral concessions and the development of major minerals, other than petroleum and atomic minerals.
    2. Who grants a lease: State governments grant prospecting licences and mining leases, under rules the Centre lays down.
    3. Auction and the district fund: The 2015 amendment made auction the only route to a concession and created a District Mineral Foundation in every mining district.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2025, GS2, 15 marks] Examine the evolving pattern of Centre-State financial relations in the context of planned development in India. How far have the recent reforms impacted the fiscal federalism in India?”

  • Andhra Pradesh government refuses to defend Centre’s changes to transgender rights law in court

    Why in the News

    The Andhra Pradesh government has told the Supreme Court that it will not defend the 2026 amendments to the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019, since it had no role in enacting them and the law’s validity is primarily a matter for the Union. The State that issues transgender identity certificates has stepped away from defending the statute it administers.

    What did the 2026 amendments change?

    1. What the law recognised: The 2019 Act let a person’s declaration settle their gender, following National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India (2014). A two judge Bench based identity on self identification.
    2. What the amendment did: The 2026 amendments removed the right to a self perceived gender identity and tied the definition of a transgender person to physiological characteristics.
    3. The stated reason: The ground given in Parliament was that self determination would let people falsely claim a transgender identity to obtain welfare benefits.
    4. The objection: Opposition members argued that removing a right the Court recognised in 2014 attacks the dignity of transgender persons. Members of the National Council for Transgender Persons resigned as protests spread.
    5. The takeaway: A right that rested on a person’s declaration now rests on physical characteristics, which is why the change is being challenged in court.

    What has Andhra Pradesh told the Court?

    1. No independent discrimination: The State’s affidavit, filed in August, says it has taken no independent action discriminatory towards transgender persons.
    2. The Union has not answered yet: The Centre is yet to respond to at least a dozen petitions challenging the law, so only the administering States are on record.
    3. An ally against the Union’s law: Andhra Pradesh is governed by the Telugu Desam Party, an ally of the party leading the Union government.
    4. The party backed the Bill: A Telugu Desam Party member supported the Bill in the Lok Sabha in March, citing complaints of people falsely adopting a transgender identity to beg.

    How does Uttarakhand’s position differ?

    1. A State defending the amendment: The Uttarakhand government has defended the 2026 amendments in the same proceedings.
    2. Its factual claim: It submitted that the amended law has taken away none of the rights transgender persons held in the State, and that identification, certification and welfare continue as before.
    3. Its explanation: It argued that social attitudes and the way existing services are run shape the rights and healthcare transgender persons actually get, as much as the law does.

    Why does a State’s refusal matter?

    1. States run the certification: The 2019 Act gives the District Magistrate power to issue the certificate of identity, so the definition’s practical meaning is set by State machinery.
    2. The Court reads what States file: Where a central law is administered by States, their affidavits are the evidence of how it operates.
    3. A split defence: Two States governed by allied parties have taken opposite positions on the same amendment, so the Union’s law no longer has a single State defence.

    Challenges

    1. Proof shifts to a physical test: A definition tied to physiological characteristics makes recognition turn on examination, which the 2019 Act was written to avoid.
    2. Statute against a constitutional finding: A right traced to Articles 14, 15, 19 and 21 does not fall because the statute recording it was amended.
    3. Entitlements follow the certificate: Welfare access is keyed to the identity certificate, so a narrower definition narrows every scheme built on it. Eg. Garima Greh shelter homes.

    Way Forward

    1. Restore declaration as the basis: Parliament should make self declaration the basis of the certificate again, keeping medical procedure a matter of choice.
    2. One Union affidavit on operation: The Union should file one affidavit stating how the amended definition is to be applied, so District Magistrates are not left improvising.
    3. Put certification data on record: Require every State to publish applications, certificates issued and rejections each year, so the amendment’s effect is measurable.
    4. Fill the council: Reconstitute the National Council for Transgender Persons with community nominees, so objections are heard before rules are framed.

    Conclusion

    The Court is being asked whether identity rests on a person’s own declaration or on physical characteristics. What to watch is whether other States that must administer the Act also decline to defend it.

    Key numbers

    1. Identity card applications in Andhra Pradesh: 3,750 (State affidavit, 2026).
    2. Certificates issued: 3,233 of those applications.
    3. Applications not taken forward: 403.
    4. Applications still pending: 114.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2026, GS2, 10 marks] Right to privacy relating to self-identity is very dear to every human being and well protected under Article 21 of the Constitution. In this context, examine the effect of the amendment in 2026, to the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019.”

  • Disquiet within, all three Election Commissioners meet, take first steps

    Why in the News

    The Election Commission of India has announced nine decisions answering objections its two Election Commissioners filed over ten months, at its first full meeting since a reported divide became public. Voters served notices in the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls need no longer attend a hearing.

    What is the Special Intensive Revision doing to voters?

    1. What the revision is: A Special Intensive Revision rebuilds the roll instead of updating it, so a listed voter must prove eligibility again. It works like a fresh registration drive.
    2. Who gets a notice: A notice goes to a voter absent from the earlier roll who could name no parent, marked unmapped, or to one the software flags as inconsistent, a logical discrepancy.
    3. How far it has run: The revision is complete in twenty States and Union Territories. Anyone left out may apply to the Electoral Registration Officer, who decides roll entries.
    4. The takeaway: The burden of proof has moved from the administration to the voter, so a software flag can endanger an elector’s name.

    What has the Commission now decided?

    1. No hearing for a noticed voter: Booth Level Officers will collect documents at home and upload them on ECINet, the Commission’s roll portal, instead of a hearing.
    2. Hearings only by exception: Any hearing still needed is held preferably online, and any adult family member may attend for the elector.
    3. Meetings and approvals on record: Agendas will be circulated and minutes issued for every meeting, officers’ foreign travel needs approval, and Commissioners’ directions must be obeyed.
    4. Systems put under review: New technology modules go to a Committee of Officers. A committee under a Senior Deputy Election Commissioner, with an independent expert, will audit ECINet against the Acts and Rules.
    5. Access for field officers: Field officers keep role based access matching their statutory powers, with more flexibility enabled if required.

    What had the two Commissioners put on record?

    1. A body that decides by majority: The Commission is constituted under Article 324 and has decided by majority as a three member body since 1993.
    2. Objections on file: The two Commissioners objected at least fourteen times, on registration, deletion, restoration, appeals against restorations, and control of the roll systems.
    3. Treated as suggestions: The notes were recorded as suggestions covering uncirculated agendas, unapproved travel, denied access to ERONet, the officers’ roll system, and a work redistribution order never carried out.

    What do the nine decisions leave unanswered?

    1. The enrolment form declaration: A declaration added to Form 6, the enrolment application under the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, is withdrawn except inside the revision.
    2. The online form goes unmentioned: The question on an applicant’s parents sits in the online Form 6. Only the Law Ministry can amend it, and the note omits whether it stays.
    3. A contested claim about the Court: The Commission says the Supreme Court upheld the declaration, a reading the court’s order does not support.
    4. West Bengal appeals unexplained: The note does not say who authorised appeals against voters judicial officers had cleared.
    5. Goa’s missing electors: Ninety seven electors cleared locally were absent from Goa’s final roll, and eighty one have reapplied. The note does not say why Goa’s restoration facility was never enabled.

    Challenges

    1. Equal say, unequal tenure: The Commission decides by majority, yet only the Chief Election Commissioner has a Supreme Court judge’s removal protection, and an Election Commissioner goes on his recommendation.
    2. A software flag with legal consequence: A centralised program generates the notice that puts a name at risk, and the elector cannot see the flagging rule.
    3. Deletion is faster than restoration: A name removed in a revision returns only through a fresh application, so an error costs the voter a vote.
    4. The registering authority as adversary: Where the Commission appeals against inclusions ordered by statutory officers, an elector must contest the body keeping the roll.

    Way Forward

    1. Publish the flagging logic: Publish the rules by which the software flags a discrepancy, so an elector can answer the notice.
    2. A reasoned order before deletion: Require the Electoral Registration Officer to pass a written, appealable order before removing a name.
    3. Minute the dissent: Record each Commissioner’s position in every meeting’s minutes, so a majority decision is visible as one.

    Conclusion

    Procedure inside the Commission has been repaired and the decisions that produced the dispute stand. What remains unsettled is whether two members who recorded objections now carry weight on the next decision.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2026, GS2, 10 marks] Is the right to vote a fundamental right? Discuss the position of the Election Commission of India while undertaking the revision of electoral rolls. Can it also examine the question of citizenship of voters?”

  • Why bank unions are going on strike

    Why in the News

    The United Forum of Bank Unions, claiming seven unions and around 90 percent of banking employees, has called a three day nationwide strike from 28 to 30 September, with an indefinite strike threatened from 26 October. The demand driving it, a five day banking week, has already been accepted by the banks’ own representative body and sent to the government. The strike is aimed at a decision the employers cannot take.

    What are the four demands?

    1. Five day banking week: All Saturdays should become bank holidays, so branches work Monday to Friday.
    2. Performance linked incentive scheme: The government’s revised incentive scheme should be changed, because it rewards only the senior grades.
    3. Bilateral discussion on that scheme: The scheme should be settled by negotiation with the unions, not by a government order.
    4. Pending issues: Items left outstanding from earlier wage settlements should be closed.

    Why has the five day week not closed?

    1. What it would change: Branches now close on the second and fourth Saturdays, and the unions want every Saturday closed, with weekday hours lengthened so customer hours do not fall.
    2. The employers already agreed: The Indian Banks’ Association, the representative body of banks in India, accepted the demand and sent it to the government more than two years ago.
    3. Why bargaining cannot finish it: Pay and hours are set by bipartite settlements between the unions and the banks. A bank holiday is notified by government under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
    4. The government’s position: The finance ministry says the proposal remains under consideration with several stakeholders to be weighed, and has asked the unions to defer the strike.
    5. The takeaway: A demand both sides at the table have settled cannot be implemented, because the authority that decides it does not sit at the table.

    Why is the incentive scheme contested?

    1. What the scheme is: The performance linked incentive was introduced in the 2020 wage settlement and paid staff according to their own bank’s performance.
    2. What the revision did: A revised government scheme covers Grade 4A officers and above, so the lower scales get nothing, which is why officers’ associations opposed it.

    What will the strike disrupt?

    1. Timing is the pressure point: The strike ends on 30 September, the half yearly closing date, when banks must close their books for the half year.
    2. Branches carry the impact: Cash deposits and withdrawals, cheque clearing and account related work at public sector branches face disruption.
    3. Where service continues: Unified Payments Interface, internet banking and automated teller machines are expected to keep running, and private bank branches to function largely as usual.
    4. Sunday opening to shorten the gap: Public sector and regional rural banks opened on Sunday, because a weekend followed by three strike days would close branches for five days running.
    5. Contingency steps: The finance ministry has asked banks to keep automated teller machines stocked, and banks have advised customers to finish time sensitive work early.

    Challenges

    1. A settled bargain with no closing authority: Bipartite settlements can agree hours, but only government can convert them into a banking holiday, so agreement alone changes nothing.
    2. Incentive design splits the workforce: A scheme confined to senior grades sets officers against clerical staff inside the same union platform.
    3. Digital channels reduce the strike’s reach: With most retail transactions on the Unified Payments Interface and automated teller machines, a branch strike reaches fewer customers each year.
    4. Rural branches absorb the gap: Cash dependent customers have no digital substitute, so a branch closure falls unevenly. Eg. regional rural bank branches.

    Way Forward

    1. Give the proposal a dated decision: The finance ministry should fix a deadline for deciding the five day banking proposal.
    2. Bring the notifying authority into the talks: Since bank holidays are notified by government, involve the Department of Financial Services and State governments before a settlement on working days is signed.
    3. Extend the incentive across scales: Link the incentive to bank level performance for every grade, so the scheme does not divide the workforce it motivates.
    4. Agree an essential services protocol: Settle with the unions which functions continue during a strike, covering cash logistics and cheque clearing.

    Conclusion

    A demand the employers accepted cannot be delivered by the employers, because the working days of banks are fixed by government notification rather than by a wage settlement. What to watch is whether a decision arrives before the indefinite strike the unions have threatened.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2024, GS3, 15 marks] Discuss the merits and demerits of the four ‘Labour Codes’ in the context of labour market reforms in India. What has been the progress so far in this regard?”

  • Centre directs captive coal plants to run at full capacity from October 1

    Why in the News

    The Centre has directed about 112 captive coal based power plants to run at maximum available capacity from 1 October to 31 December. It invoked Section 11 of the Electricity Act, 2003, an emergency power, because September peak demand came close to the year’s summer peak. Plants built to supply their own factories are now a reserve for the public grid.

    What is a captive power plant, and why direct one to run?

    1. What it is: A captive power plant is a station a factory builds to power its own operations rather than to sell electricity, like a building running on its own generator.
    2. Why factories build them: Captive generation is exempt from the cross subsidy surcharge, an extra charge grid consumers pay that funds cheaper supply to other categories, so self supply costs less.
    3. What the emergency power does: Section 11 of the Electricity Act, 2003 lets the government order a station to operate as it directs in extraordinary circumstances, overriding the owner’s commercial choice.
    4. The takeaway: An emergency provision is pulling privately owned capacity into the public market, because the grid has no other reserve it can order into service quickly.

    What does the direction require?

    1. Who is covered: Every coal based captive plant of 50 megawatt and above must generate to the maximum extent of its available capacity.
    2. Surplus to the market: After meeting its own factory demand, a generator must offer the surplus on the power exchanges, where electricity is traded for the next day or the next hour.
    3. Fuel stock: Generators must hold adequate coal stock so fuel availability does not limit generation.
    4. Weekly reporting: Generators must report weekly to the Central Electricity Authority, the government’s technical adviser on power planning, on generation, captive use, exchange sales and coal stock.

    Why was it invoked in September?

    1. Out of season demand: Electricity demand rose unusually this September and approached peak summer levels, so capacity kept for May was needed out of season.
    2. A September record: Peak demand touched 269 gigawatt, the highest ever recorded in that month and almost equal to the year’s May peak.
    3. Not a first invocation: The provision has been used in earlier years during peak summer months.

    What does the Coastal Gujarat Power extension add?

    1. A second invocation: The power ministry extended the same mechanism to Coastal Gujarat Power Ltd, Tata Power’s imported coal based station, until 31 December, continuing an arrangement running since March.
    2. Why it had shut: The 4 gigawatt station sat idle for nearly six months, because imported fuel costs were high and no viable power purchase arrangement existed.
    3. A revised contract reopened it: The Gujarat government approved a revised power purchase arrangement earlier this year, clearing the way for long term supply to resume.
    4. Why only this plant: The recorded ground is that other imported coal based plants were operating without difficulty.

    Challenges

    1. An exception used as policy: Section 11 is written for extraordinary circumstances, and repeated seasonal use turns a statutory exception into a planning instrument with no fixed review.
    2. Captive generators carry the risk: An industrial user ordered to run flat out buys more coal and sells the surplus at exchange prices it does not set.
    3. Coal logistics, not capacity, binds: Maximum generation depends on coal rakes, the trainloads that carry fuel to a plant, actually arriving, which a direction cannot create.
    4. The shortfall is a few hours long: Demand peaks in the evening, so ordering stations built to run steadily all day adds energy the grid does not need.

    Way Forward

    1. Contract the reserve instead of ordering it: The Ministry of Power should buy captive surplus as a paid seasonal reserve, so capacity is available without an emergency provision.
    2. Pay for standing by: Widen the ancillary services market, which pays a generator to stay on standby for the grid operator, so flexible capacity earns for being available.
    3. Build for the evening peak: Tie battery storage and pumped hydro tenders to evening peak hours, since that is where the shortfall sits.
    4. Stock before the season: The coal ministry and the railways should fix rake plans and plant stock targets before each demand season.

    Conclusion

    The grid no longer has a single summer peak, and the Centre is meeting the new one by ordering private industrial capacity into the public market. What to watch is whether that reserve is contracted in advance or ordered again under an emergency power.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2026, GS3, 15 marks] Explain the key challenges for India’s energy security. What measures do you suggest for ensuring energy security along with economic growth and sustainability?”

  • Centre notifies Kandla, JNPA, Mundra and Paradip as mega ports

    Why in the News

    The Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways has notified four ports as mega ports under the Indian Ports Act, 2025, three of them major ports and one privately operated. This is the first use of the Act’s power to grade ports by size rather than by ownership. It places a privately run port in the same statutory class as ports the Union administers.

    What is a mega port under the Indian Ports Act, 2025?

    1. What it is: A mega port is a port the Centre puts in its highest class once it meets published scale criteria. It works like a size based star rating.
    2. Why the Act provides for it: The Indian Ports Act, 2025 replaced the colonial era Indian Ports Act, 1908 and made a port’s class follow notified criteria rather than practice.
    3. What the criteria say: The criteria were notified on 30 July 2026 after consulting State governments. The notification records only that all four ports meet them.
    4. The takeaway: Size now decides which ports the Centre treats as nationally significant, so being a major port is no longer what puts a port in the top tier.

    What exactly has been notified?

    1. The major ports in the set: Deendayal (Kandla), Jawaharlal Nehru (Nhava Sheva) and Paradip are major ports, administered under the Major Port Authorities Act, 2021.
    2. Two routes, one notification: The three major ports were notified under Section 73(2), and Mundra under Section 73(3), the route for a port that is not a major port.
    3. Who runs the fourth: Mundra is operated by Adani Ports and Special Economic Zone, a private company, not by a Union port authority.
    4. When it takes effect: The notification was issued on 25 September 2026 and came into force when it was published in the Gazette of India.

    Why does one private port in the class matter?

    1. Two constitutional lists: Major ports fall under Entry 27 of the Union List and every other port under Entry 31 of the Concurrent List, so the two answer to different governments.
    2. A State regulator for a mega port: Ports other than major ports in Gujarat are regulated by the Gujarat Maritime Board, so the Centre has graded a port it does not administer.
    3. Scale of the private port: Mundra is the country’s largest privately operated port by cargo handled, which is why a class defined by size could not exclude it.

    Challenges

    1. One class, two regulators: A mega port in State jurisdiction is still licensed and charged tariffs by a State maritime board, so the new label changes no regulator.
    2. Rail and road capacity binds: A port can unload more cargo than the rail lines and roads behind it carry away, so a higher class does not move cargo faster.
    3. Concentration of traffic: Grading by size rewards ports that already dominate traffic, widening the gap with smaller ports competing for the same cargo.

    Way Forward

    1. Publish the score against each criterion: The Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways should publish how each port scored on every notified criterion, so the class is auditable.
    2. A common protocol with State boards: Agree one clearance and reporting protocol with State maritime boards for mega ports outside Union jurisdiction.
    3. Tie the label to connectivity targets: Link mega port status to dated rail and road milestones under the Sagarmala programme, so grading pulls connectivity investment.
    4. Fix a review cycle: Provide that a port failing the criteria on review loses the classification.

    Conclusion

    Port classification has moved from who owns a port to how much it handles, and the first list crosses the Union and State line. What to watch is what the class entitles a port to, and whether State maritime boards get a formal place in that decision.

    Back2Basics: Major Port Authorities Act, 2021

    1. What it replaced: The Act replaced the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 and converted port trusts into Port Authority Boards.
    2. What it covers: It governs the major ports the Union administers, not ports in State jurisdiction.
    3. Tariffs: Each Board fixes its own scale of rates instead of following a central tariff authority.
    4. Composition: Each Board has independent members alongside State and central ministry representatives.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2023] Consider the following pairs : Port / Well Known as 1. Kamarajar Port : First major port in India registered as a company 2. Mundra Port : Largest privately owned port in India 3. Visakhapatnam Port : Largest container port in India How many of the above pairs are correctly matched? (a) Only one pair (b) Only two pairs (c) All three pairs (d) None of the pairs Answer: (b)”

  • From Waste to Purpose: Indian Cities and Plastic Waste Management

    From Waste to Purpose: Indian Cities and Plastic Waste Management

    Why in the News?

    • Indian cities are adopting local initiatives to reduce, reuse, return, recover and recreate plastic waste.
    • The Swachh Bharat Mission (SBM), launched on 2 October 2014, has strengthened waste collection, segregation and recovery systems. Identified single-use plastic items have been prohibited since 1 July 2022.

    Key Highlights

    • Focus: Plastic waste reduction, reuse, recovery and circular economy.
    • Trichy: Market-level campaign to reduce single-use plastic.
    • Vita, Maharashtra: Thaila ATMs provide reusable cotton bags.
    • Andaman & Nicobar Islands: Buy-back system for used milk pouches.
    • Bengaluru: Material Recovery Facility under UNDP Project Prithvi.
    • Patiala: Multilayered Plastic (MLP) converted into durable chipboards.
    • SBM focuses on source segregation, door-to-door collection, scientific waste processing and material recovery.

    Reduce – Trichy Market Initiative

    • Three farmers’ markets covered:
      • Tennur
      • K.K. Nagar
      • Woraiyur
    • 220 vendors engaged.
    • ThunippaiThiruvizhai or Cloth-Bag Festival promoted reusable bags.
    • Single-use plastic avoided:
      • Tennur: 2,200 kg in one year
      • K.K. Nagar: 620 kg in four months
      • Woraiyur: 300 kg in six months

    Reuse – Thaila ATM

    • Location: Vita town, Maharashtra.
    • Five Thaila ATMs installed at crowded locations.
    • Provide reusable cotton bags through a vending-machine model.
    • Based on Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) technology for remote stock monitoring.
    • Local Self-Help Groups (SHGs) stitch the bags.
    • Around 6,000 bags sold.
    • Weekly market recorded nearly 200 bags in a day.
    • In Indapur, authorities seized 25 kg plastic bags and imposed a ₹90,000 fine.

    Return – Milk Pouch Buy-back

    • Location: Andaman and Nicobar Islands.
    • Used plastic milk pouches exchanged for rewards such as:
      • Fresh milk
      • Discounts
    • Implemented with ANIIDCO and SVPMC.
    • By November 2024:
      • 17,600 milk pouches collected.
      • 352 litres of milk provided as rewards.
    • Uses incentives to encourage responsible disposal and recycling.

    Recover – Bengaluru

    • UNDP Project Prithvi supports plastic waste recovery.
    • Swachhata Kendra, a Material Recovery Facility (MRF), established in 2019.
    • Centre sorts plastic and processes it through:
      • Shredding
      • Baling
    • Processed material becomes suitable for recyclers.
    • Provided employment to 76 Safai Saathis during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    • Processed plastic used for:
      • Roads
      • Agricultural water pipes
      • Furniture
    • Demonstrates the circular economy by returning waste into productive use.

    Recreate – Multilayered Plastics

    • Multilayered Plastics (MLPs) combine materials such as:
      • Plastic
      • Paper
      • Aluminium
    • Their multiple layers make separation and recycling difficult.
    • Patiala uses a Plastic Recycling Facility (PRF).
    • Process:
      • Sorting → cleaning → shredding → hot/cold pressing
    • Produces chipboards, an alternative to plywood.
    • Applications include:
      • Furniture
      • Roofing
      • Temporary shelters
    • Capacity: 10 tonnes/day
    • Produces 75-100 chipboards.
    • Supports circular economy and reduces landfill waste.

    Prelims Quick Revision

    • SBM: Launched on 2 October 2014.
    • Identified single-use plastic items prohibited from 1 July 2022.
    • Trichy: 220 vendors across three farmers’ markets engaged in plastic reduction.
    • Vita, Maharashtra: Five Thaila ATMs provide reusable cotton bags.
    • Andaman & Nicobar: 17,600 milk pouches collected by November 2024.
    • Bengaluru: Swachhata Kendra MRF established in 2019 under Project Prithvi.
    • Patiala: MLP waste converted into chipboards.
    • The five-part plastic approach highlighted is reduce, reuse, return, recover and recreate.

    UPSC Prelims Trap

    • MRF vs PRF: The Bengaluru initiative involves a Material Recovery Facility, while Patiala uses a Plastic Recycling Facility.
    • MLP: Multilayered plastics are difficult to recycle because they combine multiple material layers.
    • Thaila ATM: It provides reusable cotton bags, not plastic alternatives.
    • Circular economy: The Bengaluru and Patiala examples demonstrate conversion of discarded plastic into new productive materials/products, rather than simply disposing of it.
  • [26th September 2026] The Hindu OpED: The case for accountable lottery regulation in India

    [26th September 2026] The Hindu OpED: The case for accountable lottery regulation in India

    Question (2019, GS2 – 10 Marks): “From the resolution of contentious issues regarding distribution of legislative powers by the courts, ‘Principle of Federal Supremacy’ and ‘Harmonious Construction’ have emerged. Explain.
    Linkage: The B.R. Enterprises judgment is a classic example of harmonious construction and reading down a statute. The Supreme Court harmonized Union List Entry 40 (Lotteries organized by the Government of India or a State) and State List powers with Article 301 (Freedom of Trade and Commerce) to prevent discriminatory protectionism between states.

    Mentor Comment

    Prohibition of a vice with persistent demand removes legal supply and leaves the demand intact. The Lotteries (Regulation) Act, 1998 lets a State organise a lottery and lets a State prohibit lotteries organised by others. B.R. Enterprises vs State of U.P. (1999) read that second power down, so a State may exclude other States’ lotteries only by abandoning its own and becoming wholly lottery free. Faced with that trade off between revenue and regulatory control, two large States chose total prohibition and forfeited the option of running an accountable public lottery. The contest is between a State’s interest in supervising what is sold inside its territory and a legal rule built as an all or nothing choice.

    What does the Lotteries (Regulation) Act, 1998 provide?

    1. Legislative competence: Government organised lotteries fall under Entry 40 of the Union List.
    2. Section 4: The Act permits States to organise lotteries subject to the conditions in Section 4. Section 4 also permits a State to sell tickets directly, or through distributors or agents.
    3. Section 5: Section 5 empowers a State to prohibit lotteries organised by other States inside its territory.
    4. Section 6: Section 6 empowers the Union government to prohibit a lottery in violation of Sections 4 and 5.

    What harms do lotteries carry?

    1. Regressive burden: Lotteries disproportionately burden poorer households. They encourage a household to stake scarce income on a remote chance of reward.
    2. Compulsive play: Rapid draws and instant games encourage compulsive play and loss chasing.
    3. Distorted risk perception: Giant jackpots distort the perception of risk.
    4. Sales practices: Credit sales, opaque odds and manipulative advertising compound these harms.
    5. What the harms justify: These are arguments for stringent regulation, not necessarily for prohibition.

    What does a prohibition produce instead?

    1. Illegal channels: A ban pushes players towards smuggled tickets, offshore portals and unlicensed numbers betting such as matka, satta and single digit rackets.
    2. Absence of safeguards: These enterprises operate through cash agents and mule accounts. They carry no audits, no age restrictions, no secured prize funds and no effective remedy against fraud.
    3. Revenue forgone: Governments lose lottery surpluses and Goods and Services Tax (GST) revenue.
    4. Livelihoods and enforcement: Legitimate vendors, many of them poor or disabled, lose their livelihoods. Enforcement costs rise at the same time.
    5. The paradox of protection: A state seeking to protect the vulnerable leaves them at the mercy of unaccountable operators.

    Is the state’s paternalism applied evenly across classes?

    1. Permitted speculation: An affluent citizen can day trade, use leveraged derivatives or speculate in crypto assets. The risk of ruinous losses in those markets is no bar to entry.
    2. No competence test: The state does not test competence before admitting a retail trader to these markets. Securities trading involves skill, and derivatives support hedging and price discovery.
    3. The regulator’s own finding: The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) found that the vast majority of day traders, and of traders in futures and options, incurred losses.
    4. Why markets are legal: Financial markets are legal because risks are disclosed, intermediaries are regulated and fraud is punished. Adult choice is preserved alongside those safeguards.
    5. Application to lotteries: Lotteries can follow the same principle, with more stringent safeguards appropriate to games of chance.

    What does international practice show about regulating rather than banning?

    1. United States prohibition, 1920 to 1933: The United States imposed prohibition through the Eighteenth Amendment and the Volstead Act. It suppressed legal supply and left demand intact.
    2. What the ban produced: Prohibition fuelled a lucrative black market controlled by violent syndicates. Bootlegging corrupted public institutions, deprived governments of excise revenue and imposed heavy enforcement costs.
    3. The repeal: The Twenty First Amendment repealed prohibition, on the recognition that a regulated and taxed market causes fewer harms than an unenforceable ban.
    4. Controlled legality is the norm: Lotteries are legal in nearly four fifths of countries, with surpluses allocated transparently to education, health care, sports, welfare or infrastructure. Blanket prohibition survives mainly in countries enforcing strict Sharia based gambling prohibitions, such as Saudi Arabia, Iran and Brunei, and in closed ideological regimes such as Cuba.
    5. The public operator model: Nearly 70 per cent of lottery jurisdictions follow the public operator model. A government body, statutory authority or State owned company runs the lottery, and private firms supply retail and technology services.
    6. The concession model: The State regulates the lottery and grants operating rights to a private concessionaire.
    7. Federal practice: Lotteries operate in 45 of the 50 United States and Washington DC, in all 10 Canadian provinces and three territories, in all six Australian States and both mainland territories, and in all 16 German Lander.
    8. Cross border sales: Authorisation in one jurisdiction does not confer the right to sell in another. Cross border sales require the destination jurisdiction’s consent or its participation in a cooperative arrangement.
    9. Pooling without losing control: Powerball in the United States, Lotto 6/49 in Canada, the Australian lottery blocs and Germany’s national lottery bloc, the DLTB, let participating jurisdictions pool players and prizes without surrendering regulatory autonomy.

    What does Indian law do to a State that wants to regulate rather than ban?

    1. Res extra commercium: Settled Supreme Court jurisprudence treats gambling, including State organised lotteries, as res extra commercium, meaning an activity outside the protection of Article 19(1)(g), the fundamental right to trade, and of Article 301, the freedom of trade across India.
    2. The alcohol parallel: A parallel doctrine applies to potable alcohol and allows a State to restrict or prohibit consignments from outside its territory.
    3. Why the all or nothing rule is hard to justify: A State directly oversees its own lottery administration. Its oversight of another State’s operations inside its territory is necessarily indirect, and it still bears the local enforcement burden.
    4. The choice two States made: Tamil Nadu in 2003 and Karnataka in 2007 chose total prohibition. Both gave up the option of running accountable public lotteries of their own.
    5. How many States run lotteries: A Lok Sabha reply of 14 March 2023 identified nine States operating lotteries: Arunachal Pradesh, Goa, Kerala, Maharashtra, Mizoram, Nagaland, Punjab, Sikkim and West Bengal.
    6. The fiscal context: Persistent State fiscal stress makes the widespread preference for prohibition worth reconsidering.

    What would an accountable alternative look like?

    1. First amendment, to Section 5: Parliament should clarify that Section 5 applies whether or not the prohibiting State organises a lottery of its own. The consent of the destination State should be decisive, subject to uniform treatment.
    2. Uniform treatment: A State must either admit all outside lotteries or exclude them all.
    3. Second amendment, a new Section 4A: A new Section 4A should authorise two or more States to establish a common lottery by agreement, pooling players, prizes, technology and costs.
    4. Why compulsory access is no remedy: Smaller States, especially in the northeast, face exclusion from larger markets. Compulsory access is not the remedy for that exposure.
    5. Departmental operation: Marketing agents supply guaranteed revenue. Departmental operation is more transparent and opens retail distribution to small vendors, persons with disabilities, women’s self help groups and cooperatives. That widens livelihood opportunities and limits intermediary capture.
    6. The Kerala record: Kerala earned Rs 2,883.80 crore from its lottery in the 2023 to 2024 financial year. That total is Rs 1,129.71 crore in net lottery revenue and Rs 1,754.09 crore in State Goods and Services Tax.
    7. Where the surplus goes: Kerala channels its lottery surpluses into health care and welfare. Its model is a useful template for reform rather than the only one.

    Conclusion

    A vice with persistent demand does not disappear when the state withdraws the legal channel. The transaction moves to operators who keep no accounts and answer to no regulator. The real choice for a State is therefore between an auditable public supplier and an untraceable illegal one. Current law forces that choice into an all or nothing form, so a State that wants to shut out unaccountable outside operators must first shut down its own accountable one, and it is that single provision that has to change first.

    Betting and Gambling Regulation in India

    1. Scale of the market: The online betting and gaming market was valued at 5.02 billion dollars in 2024 to 2025. It is projected to reach 10.77 billion dollars by 2030.
    2. User base: India has over 517 million online gamers, of whom 155 million play money based games. India accounts for 20 per cent of the global gaming user base.
    3. Split jurisdiction: Gambling is a State subject, and online gaming has been brought under the Union. That split produces persistent legal friction.
    4. The skill and chance test: In Dr. K.R. Lakshmanan v. State of Tamil Nadu (1996) the Court established the predominance of skill test. Horse racing qualified as a game of skill on that test.

    Government Initiatives

    1. Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act, 2025: The Act prohibits online money games, meaning real money betting, and permits e sports and social games.
    2. Online Gaming Authority of India: A central regulator under the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology classifies games, issues digital certificates and handles enforcement.
    3. Blocking duty on intermediaries: Amendments to the information technology intermediary guidelines require an intermediary to block any platform flagged as a money game by the Authority.

More posts