💥UPSC 2026, 2027, 2028 UAP Mentorship (March Batch) + Access XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Search results for: “”

  • [27th February 2026] The Hindu OpED: The shift of critical minerals to India’s strategic centre

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2022] Do you think India will meet 50 percent of its energy needs from renewable energy by 2030? Justify your answer. How will the shift of subsidies from fossil fuels to renewables help achieve the above objective? Explain.

    Linkage: Renewable energy expansion depends on critical minerals like lithium and rare earths used in solar, wind, and EVs. Achieving 50% renewable capacity by 2030 requires secure mineral supply chains and shifting subsidies from fossil fuels to clean energy.

    Mentor’s Comment

    Critical minerals are now central to India’s industrial and geopolitical strategy. The Union Budget 2026 marks a shift from policy intent to implementation, focusing on processing capacity, domestic value addition, and secure supply chains. With 30 minerals identified and ₹16,300 crore allocated under the National Critical Minerals Mission, India is prioritising strategic autonomy amid global supply disruptions.

    Why is the shift to critical minerals a strategic turning point for India?

    1. Policy Mainstreaming: Moves critical minerals from peripheral policy concern to core industrial and geopolitical agenda. Budget speech shifts focus from identification to execution
    2. Institutional Framework: Establishes National Critical Minerals Mission (NCMM) with ₹16,300 crore outlay to coordinate exploration, mining, and processing.
    3. Strategic Context: Responds to global weaponisation of rare earth magnets and battery supply chains in 2025, exposing industrial vulnerabilities
    4. Global Concentration Risk: China controls up to 90% of global processing capacity for several critical minerals, creating supply asymmetry.
    5. Implementation Phase: Shifts discourse from “Does India need a policy?” to “Can India execute at scale, speed, and depth?”

    How does governance architecture address exploration and processing gaps?

    1. Mineral Identification: Notifies 30 critical minerals to guide regulatory and fiscal prioritisation
    2. Exploration Reform: Eases mineral exploration norms for junior miners and rationalises royalty rates.
    3. Project Pipeline: Targets 1,200 exploration projects by FY2031 under NCMM.
    4. Fiscal Incentives: Enables tax deductions for exploration expenditure for nine critical minerals.
    5. Processing Capability: Leverages existing capacity in copper, graphite, rare earth oxides, tin, and titanium, often exceeding 99.9% purity.
    6. Technological Upgradation: Recognises need for deeper refining and advanced processing for clean energy and defence applications.

    Does demand creation remain the missing link in mineral security?

    1. Capital Goods Rationalisation: Removes import duties on capital goods used in processing of critical minerals
    2. Domestic Manufacturing Push: Links mineral processing to batteries, solar modules, wind turbines, and electric vehicles.
    3. Demand Constraint: Identifies lack of assured domestic demand as a barrier to private investment in refining capacity.
    4. Industrial Multiplier: Expands electric mobility and renewable energy deployment to generate downstream mineral demand.
    5. Backward Integration: Addresses delays in domestic value chain integration that create uncertainty for midstream processors.

    Can technology and AI-driven governance enhance mineral discovery and efficiency?

    1. AI-First Exploration: Mandates Artificial Intelligence integration in mineral exploration to de-risk investments.
    2. Institutional Convergence: Aligns IndiaAI Mission, National Geospatial Policy, and Mission Anveshan for data-driven exploration.
    3. Hydrocarbon Model Extension: Expands seismic and geospatial analytics used in hydrocarbon discovery to mineral exploration.
    4. Geoscience Data Repository: Improves prospectivity analysis and site discovery through centralised digital data systems.
    5. Tax Support: Extends tax deductions for exploration expenditure to reduce risk premium.

    How does geopolitical disruption reshape India’s strategic mineral policy?

    1. Rare Earth Corridors: Announces development of rare earth corridors across coastal States.
    2. Import Substitution: Reduces import duties on monazite sands to secure feedstock.
    3. Technological Sovereignty: Uses supply chain disruption as leverage to build domestic magnet and battery ecosystems.
    4. State Role: Encourages States to upgrade port infrastructure and manpower to serve global demand.
    5. Regional Growth: Links mineral processing clusters to job creation and industrial diversification.

    Are international partnerships aligned with domestic capacity building?

    1. Strategic Partnerships: Expands cooperation with Australia, European Union, Japan, United Kingdom, and United States.
    2. Technology Transfer Challenge: Addresses reluctance of advanced economies in sharing high-end processing technologies.
    3. Regulatory Certainty: Strengthens legal frameworks to attract foreign mineral processing investment.
    4. Sintered Magnet Scheme: Allocates ₹7,280 crore for permanent magnet manufacturing ecosystem.
    5. Trade Integration: Aligns mineral strategy with India-EU Free Trade Agreement and global supply chain networks.
    6. Research Collaboration: Enhances academic and industrial linkages through UK-India Critical Minerals Supply Chain Observatory.

    Conclusion

    Critical mineral security is no longer a sectoral concern but a strategic imperative linking energy transition, manufacturing growth, and geopolitical autonomy. Budget 2026 signals a shift from ambition to execution, with emphasis on processing, technology, and global partnerships. Sustained coordination between the Union, States, and industry will determine whether India can convert mineral potential into long-term industrial and strategic strength.

  • How India and Canada have mended their frayed ties

    Why in the News?

    Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney’s visit to India signals a diplomatic reset after the 2023 rupture triggered by allegations over Hardeep Singh Nijjar’s killing. The crisis had led to diplomatic expulsions, visa suspension, and stalled trade talks. Restoration of envoys and revival of Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) negotiations mark a sharp reversal amid $23+ billion bilateral trade stakes.

    How did diplomatic escalation test principles of sovereignty and international law?

    1. Allegations of Extraterritorial Action: Canada accused Indian agents of involvement in Nijjar’s killing in British Columbia (2023), raising concerns under international law and state sovereignty norms.
    2. Reciprocal Diplomatic Expulsions: Both countries expelled diplomats, reducing institutional diplomatic engagement.
    3. Suspension of Visa Services: India temporarily halted visa issuance for Canadians, affecting people-to-people ties.
    4. Terrorism vs. Political Dissent Debate: India classified Nijjar as a designated terrorist under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA), while Canada treated him as a political activist.
    5. Institutional Accountability: Canada initiated investigations; India demanded credible evidence before cooperation.

    What governance mechanisms enabled bilateral recovery?

    1. Leadership Change in Canada: Mark Carney’s accession shifted tone toward calibrated engagement.
    2. Reinstatement of High Commissioners: Diplomatic normalization restored formal communication channels.
    3. G20 Engagement: Modi-Carney interaction at the 2025 G7 Summit in Canada signaled political willingness for reset.
    4. Structured Dialogue Restoration: Agreement to revive working groups on trade, security, and mobility.

    How significant are trade and economic linkages in sustaining the relationship?

    1. Goods Trade (2024): $8.98 billion; exports $4.14 billion; imports $4.84 billion.
    2. Services Trade (2024): $14.22 billion; reflects strong education and IT linkages.
    3. Strategic Commodities: Canada supplies pulses, potash, uranium; India exports pharmaceuticals, textiles, machinery.
    4. CEPA Negotiations: Aim to expand trade to $30 billion by 2030.
    5. Energy Partnership: Canada as a reliable supplier of oil, LNG, and critical minerals.

    How does diaspora politics shape foreign policy and domestic security calculations?

    1. Large Diaspora Presence: Over 1.8 million Indo-Canadians; politically influential in key provinces.
    2. Khalistan Issue: Small but vocal separatist groups influenced bilateral tensions.
    3. Balancing Act: Canada must reconcile free speech protections with counter-terror obligations.
    4. India’s Security Concerns: Cross-border extremism framed as “transnational crime” in bilateral talks.

    What role do multilateral and strategic platforms play in normalisation?

    1. G20 Collaboration: Shared membership necessitates policy coordination.
    2. Indo-Pacific Strategy: Canada seeks stronger Asia engagement; India remains central.
    3. Five Eyes Sensitivity: Canada’s intelligence alignment with US, UK, Australia, New Zealand complicated trust dynamics.
    4. Energy & Climate Cooperation: Clean energy transition, nuclear cooperation under civil nuclear agreement.

    What institutional lessons emerge for diplomatic crisis management?

    1. Crisis Communication Channels: Importance of sustained back-channel diplomacy.
    2. Legal Evidence Standards: Need for transparent, rule-based investigative cooperation.
    3. Trade Insulation Mechanisms: Economic negotiations often pause but resume once political clarity returns.
    4. Diaspora Governance: Foreign policy increasingly intersects with domestic electoral politics.

    Conclusion

    India-Canada relations underscore how diaspora politics, domestic compulsions, and national security concerns can significantly influence bilateral diplomacy between democracies. The recent reset reflects pragmatic statecraft, economic interdependence, and institutional resilience, but the durability of this rapprochement will depend on credible security cooperation, responsible diaspora management, and sustained political dialogue.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2020] ‘Indian diaspora has a decisive role to play in the politics and economy of America and European Countries’. Comment with examples.

    Linkage: The India-Canada diplomatic crisis highlights how diaspora politics can directly influence bilateral relations, domestic electoral calculations, and foreign policy positioning in Western democracies. It demonstrates that the Indian diaspora is not merely an economic asset but also a political actor shaping strategic outcomes and diplomatic tensions.

  • Have AI products/LLMs started to disrupt the software services industry?

    Why in the News?

    India’s $250+ billion IT services industry is witnessing structural churn due to rapid enterprise adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Large Language Models (LLMs). AI has rapidly moved from pilot projects to full-scale deployment in India’s IT services industry. Companies are restructuring teams and changing billing models as automation begins to reduce dependency on large manpower-based delivery.

    Is AI-driven productivity restructuring India’s traditional labour-arbitrage IT model?

    1. Labour Arbitrage Model: India’s IT growth historically depended on low-cost skilled manpower and time-and-material billing structures.
    2. AI-Enabled Productivity Gains: Generative AI assists coding, testing, documentation, and DevOps processes, reducing manual effort.
    3. Reduced Headcount Dependency: Tasks earlier requiring 8-10 engineers may now require significantly fewer personnel.
    4. Shift in Developer Roles: Engineers increasingly supervise AI outputs instead of manually writing baseline code.
    5. Enterprise Adoption: AI tools are embedded in workflow systems rather than treated as experimental add-ons.

    Does AI disproportionately impact entry-level and BPO/KPO employment structures?

    1. Routine Automation: Repetitive and well-defined tasks in BPO/KPO segments are highly automatable.
    2. Entry-Level Vulnerability: Coding support, documentation drafting, and testing roles face reduction.
    3. Reskilling Imperative: Demand shifts toward prompt engineering, AI model supervision, and domain integration.
    4. Net Employment Effect: Overall revenue per engineer may increase, but entry pathways narrow.
    5. Mid-Level Stability: Complex integration, client management, and architecture roles remain comparatively resilient.

    Is the IT services billing architecture shifting from manpower-based to outcome-based pricing?

    1. Traditional Pyramid Model: Revenue historically linked to number of deployed engineers.
    2. Automation Impact: AI reduces billable hours while increasing efficiency.
    3. Outcome-Based Pricing: Clients demand delivery linked to quality, productivity, and time benchmarks.
    4. Margin Preservation: Firms attempt to maintain profitability despite lower headcount expansion.
    5. Service Model Transformation: Predictable delivery replaces volume-based staffing.

    Are Indian IT firms building foundational AI capabilities or remaining service integrators?

    1. Foundational Model Ownership: Major LLM development remains concentrated in US and Chinese firms.
    2. Service-Dominant Strategy: Indian companies focus on AI integration, customization, and enterprise embedding.
    3. Infrastructure Constraints: Limited domestic investment in compute capacity and advanced semiconductor ecosystems.
    4. Strategic Choice: Debate between investing in sovereign AI models versus deepening service specialization.
    5. Global Competitiveness: Scaling, execution efficiency, and process rigour remain India’s strengths.

    Does AI transformation necessitate new regulatory and social protection frameworks?

    1. Employment Transition Risks: Automation may temporarily increase unemployment in routine segments.
    2. Skill Certification Gap: Absence of standardized AI skill accreditation mechanisms.
    3. Data Governance Concerns: AI deployment raises issues of data privacy, algorithmic bias, and compliance.
    4. Energy & Environmental Costs: Data centres increase electricity consumption and water usage.
    5. Policy Preparedness: Need for labour transition planning, digital skilling missions, and regulatory clarity.

    Is AI replacing software engineers or redefining their functional role?

    1. Task Automation vs Role Elimination: AI reduces repetitive coding but increases need for oversight.
    2. AI-Assisted Development: Engineers validate AI-generated code for architectural integrity.
    3. Domain Integration: Banking, healthcare, and financial services require contextual expertise.
    4. Product Engineering Shift: Movement from services to proprietary frameworks and tools.
    5. Horizontal Skill Structure: Less hierarchical team pyramids.

    Conclusion

    AI-led transformation marks a structural shift in India’s IT services growth model from labour arbitrage to productivity arbitrage. The challenge is not technological disruption itself, but managing its employment, skill, and regulatory implications. A calibrated approach that combines innovation, large-scale reskilling, data governance, and employment-sensitive growth strategy will determine whether AI becomes a source of competitive advantage or structural imbalance.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2022] ‘Economic growth in the recent past has been led by increase in labour productivity.’ Explain this statement. Suggest the growth pattern that will lead to creation of more jobs without compromising labour productivity.

    Linkage: This question links directly to GS-3 themes of jobless growth, labour productivity, digitalisation, and structural transformation of the Indian economy, especially in the context of AI-driven automation. It is also highly relevant for Essays on “Growth vs Employment,” “Technology and Jobs,” and “Inclusive Development in the Age of AI.”

  • SEBI Revamps Mutual Fund Rulebook

    Why in the News

    The Securities and Exchange Board of India introduced major reforms for the ₹81 lakh crore mutual fund industry to ensure schemes remain true to their stated objectives.

    Key Changes

    1. Solution-Oriented Schemes Discontinued

    • No fresh inflows allowed in retirement and children funds.
    • Existing schemes to be merged with similar asset allocation schemes.
    • Aim: Remove redundant category and improve clarity.

    2. Introduction of Life Cycle Funds

    • Goal-based, open-ended schemes.
    • Asset allocation shifts automatically over time via glide path.
    • Designed around target maturity dates.

    3. Higher Exposure Limits

    • Up to 35% investment allowed in:
      • Gold
      • Silver
      • Infrastructure Investment Trusts
    • Provides equity funds greater flexibility and diversification.

    4. Restriction on Portfolio Overlap

    • Less than 50% overlap required:
      • Between sectoral and thematic funds
      • Between equity and sectoral or thematic funds
    • Objective: Reduce duplication and ensure differentiated strategies.

    5. Relaxation for Contra and Value Funds

    • Earlier: Only one of the two allowed per fund house.
    • Now: Both can be offered.

    Prelims Pointers

    • SEBI regulates securities market and mutual funds in India.
    • InvITs pool funds for infrastructure projects.
    • Life cycle funds follow glide path asset allocation.
    • Portfolio overlap norms aim to prevent excessive duplication across schemes.
    [2023] Consider the following statements: Statement-I: Interest income from the deposits in Infrastructure Investment Trusts (InvITs) distributed to their investors is exempted from tax, but the dividend is taxable. 

    Statement-II: InvITs are recognized as borrowers under the ‘Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002’. 

    Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements? 

    (a) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I 

    (b) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is not the correct explanation for Statement-I 

    (c) Statement-I is correct but Statement-II is incorrect 

    (d) Statement-I is incorrect but Statement-II is correct

  • India–Israel Elevate Ties to Special Strategic Partnership

    Why in the News

    India and Israel elevated bilateral relations to a Special Strategic Partnership for Peace, Innovation and Prosperity during Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to Israel. A total of 17 pacts were signed.

    Key Outcomes

    1. Upgrade of Bilateral Ties

    • Earlier: Strategic Partnership since 2017
    • Now: Special Strategic Partnership
    • Focus on technology, defence, innovation and economic cooperation

    2. Technology Partnership

    • Launch of Critical and Emerging Technologies Partnership
    • Cooperation in:
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • Quantum technologies
      • Cyber security
      • Critical minerals

    3. Defence Cooperation

    • Roadmap for joint development and joint production
    • Emphasis on transfer of technology
    • Defence ties described as expanding in scope and scale

    4. Economic & Trade Measures

    • Bilateral Investment Agreement operationalised
    • FTA negotiations to be finalised soon
    • UPI to be enabled in Israel
    • Financial dialogue mechanism launched

    5. Agriculture & Innovation

    • Target of 100 Centres of Excellence
    • Plan for Villages of Excellence
    • India Israel Innovation Centre for Agriculture to be set up
    • 20 joint agricultural research fellowships

    6. Manpower & People Ties

    • Expansion of labour mobility under 2023 agreement
    • Quota of up to 50,000 Indian workers over five years
    • Launch of India Israel Academic Forum

    7. Regional & Global Issues

    • Strong condemnation of terrorism
    • Support for Gaza peace efforts
    • Focus on IMEEC and I2U2 initiatives

    Prelims Pointers

    • India Israel ties established in 1992
    • Strategic Partnership declared in 2017
    • Now elevated to Special Strategic Partnership in 2026
    • Cooperation spans defence, agriculture, AI, cyber security and innovation
    • IMEEC: India Middle East Europe Economic Corridor
    • I2U2: India Israel UAE USA grouping
    [2018] The term “two-state solution” is sometimes mentioned in the news in the context of the affairs of (a) China  

    (b) Israel 

    (c) Iraq  

    (d) Yemen

  • New GDP Series to Better Capture Economy

    Why in the News

    The Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation will release a new GDP series on February 27, 2026, updating the base year to 2022-23 and introducing major data and methodological improvements.

    Key Changes

    1. Base Year Updated

    • From 2011-12 to 2022-23
    • Reflects current economic structure including digitalisation and formalisation

    2. Better Corporate & Government Data

    • Sector-wise allocation based on actual activity share
    • Inclusion of government housing services
    • Expanded coverage of autonomous and local bodies

    3. Stronger Household & Informal Sector Estimates

    • Annual use of ASUSE and PLFS data
    • More granular measurement of private consumption

    4. New Data Sources

    • Wider use of GST data for output estimation
    • Banking data from Reserve Bank of India
    • Actual NBFC data instead of proxy estimates

    5. Technical Upgrade

    • Use of double deflator method for better real GDP estimation

    Prelims Takeaway

    • GDP and GVA series now aligned to 2022-23 base year
    • GST integrated more deeply in estimation
    • Informal and unincorporated sector measurement improved
    • Double deflation enhances accuracy of real growth calculation
    [2013] The national income of a country for a given period is equal to the (a) total value of goods and services produced by the nationals 

    (b) sum of total consumption and investment expenditure 

    (c) sum of personal income of all individuals 

    (d) money value of final goods and services produced

  • DGCA Revises Airfare Refund and Cancellation Rules

    Why in the News

    The Directorate General of Civil Aviation has revised airfare refund and cancellation rules to address rising passenger grievances. The new rules will come into effect from March 26, 2026.

    Why the Changes Were Introduced

    • DGCA stated that refund related complaints have become a major source of grievance, including:
      • Delayed refunds
      • Airlines adjusting refunds against future travel
      • Disputes over refund value

    Key Changes in the New Rules

    1. Faster Refunds for Agent Bookings

    • Earlier: 30 working days
    • Now: 14 working days
    • Applies to tickets booked through travel agents and online portals.

    2. Extended “Look-In” Period

    • The “look-in” period allows cancellation or amendment without charge.
    • Earlier: 24 hours
    • Now: 48 hours
    • However, conditions changed:
    • Must be booked at least:
      • 7 days before departure for domestic flights
      • 15 days before departure for international flights
    • Applies only to tickets booked directly via airline websites.
    • Not automatically applicable for bookings via agents or portals.

    3. Name Correction Window

    • Free correction allowed within 24 hours.
    • Now applies only if ticket is booked directly through airline website.
    • Bookings via agents may attract charges even within 24 hours.

    4. New Medical Emergency Clause

    • Refund or credit shell allowed in case of:
      • Hospitalisation of passenger
      • Hospitalisation of family member on same PNR
    • For other medical cases:
      • Refund subject to medical fitness certification from an airline aerospace medicine specialist or DGCA empanelled expert.

    What Remains Unchanged

    • Most other refund provisions remain the same.
    • Government maintains non interference in airline commercial pricing.
    • Benchmarks fixed to protect consumer interest.

    Prelims Pointers

    • DGCA functions under Ministry of Civil Aviation.
    • It regulates safety, licensing and consumer standards in aviation.
    • “Look-in” period allows free cancellation within a limited time after booking.
    • Refund timelines are now 14 working days for agent bookings.
    • Medical emergency clause newly introduced in 2026 revision.
    [2025] With reference to the Government of India, consider the following information: Organization : Some of its functions : It works under I. Directorate of Enforcement : Enforcement of the Fugitive Economic Offenders Act, 2018 : Internal Security Division–I, Ministry of Home Affairs 

    II. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence : Enforces the provisions of the Customs Act, 1962 : Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance 

    III. Directorate General of Systems and Data Management : Carrying out big data analytics to assist tax officers for better policy and nabbing tax evaders : Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance 

    In how many of the above rows is the information correctly matched?

    (a) Only one (b) Only two (c) All three (d) None
  • 🔴[UPSC Webinar for 2027] By Siddhi Ma’am, Mentor, Civilsdaily IAS | How to Make Notes and Start Your UPSC 2027 Preparation the Right Way | Join on 27th Feb at 7PM

    🔴[UPSC Webinar for 2027] By Siddhi Ma’am, Mentor, Civilsdaily IAS | How to Make Notes and Start Your UPSC 2027 Preparation the Right Way | Join on 27th Feb at 7PM

    Register Now!

    Register for the session

    Register Now!

    Read about Webinar

    Most aspirants don’t struggle because they lack effort.

    They struggle because they start wrong.

    Too many sources.
    Too many random notes.
    No structure.
    No clarity.

    If you are starting your UPSC 2027 preparation, the first 3–4 months will decide the direction of your entire journey.

    In this live session, I will show you exactly how to make effective notes and start your UPSC 2027 preparation the right way.

    Siddhi Ma’am, Mentor, Civilsdaily IAS

    What I’ll do in this live session:

    1. How to Begin UPSC 2027 Without Overwhelm
    • What to study first
    • How to select limited, high quality sources
    • How to avoid the resource collection trap
    • How to build a realistic weekly structure

    Starting simple is smarter than starting heavy.

    2. The Right Way to Make Notes
    • What to write, and what not to write
    • How to make concise, revision friendly notes
    • Digital vs handwritten notes, what works better
    • How to integrate current affairs into static notes

    Because bulky notes slow you down later.

    3. Building a Strong Foundation Year
    • How to complete core GS subjects systematically
    • When to start answer writing
    • How to balance optional with GS
    • How to revise without burnout

    Preparation is a marathon, not a sprint.

    4. Mistakes Beginners Must Avoid
    • Copying toppers blindly
    • Making notes from too many sources
    • Delaying revision
    • Ignoring PYQs in the initial phase

    Clarity now saves you one entire attempt later.


    Who should attend:

    • UPSC 2027 beginners
    • College students planning early preparation
    • Working professionals starting fresh
    • Repeaters wanting to reset their foundation
    Register Now!

    Join us, for a 45 minute live Zoom session on 27th Feb at 7PM.

    See you in masterclass.

    Register Now!

    It will be a 45 minute session, post which we will open up the floor for all kinds of queries which a beginner must have. No questions are taboo and Siddhi Ma’am is known to be patiently solving all your doubts.

    Join us for a Zoom session on 27th Feb at 7 PM. This session is a must attend for you If you are attempting UPSC for the first time or have attempted earlier and now preparing for 2027, then it is going to be a valuable session for you too.

    See you in the session”

    Register for the session for a complete in-depth UPSC Prep

    Register Now!

    In this Civilsdaily masterclass, you will get:

    1. A 45-minute deep dive on how to plan your UPSC strategy from the start to the end.
    2. How do first-attempt IAS Rankers get the most out of their one year prep?
    3. Insider tips that only the top IAS and IPS rankers know and apply to get rank.

    By the end, you’ll have razor-sharp clarity and a clear path to crack UPSC with confidence and near-perfect certainty. 

    Join UPSC session on 27th Feb, at 7 PM

    Register Now!

    (Don’t wait—the next webinar/session won’t be until Mid March’26)

    These masterclasses are packed with value. They are conducted in private with a closed community. We rarely open these webinars for everyone for free. This time we are keeping it for 300 seats only.

    Ready to attend the UPSC Webinar?

    Register Now!

    Not sure yet?

    We recommend you register here. It takes less than 10 seconds to register.

    • No spam! Once in a while, we’ll only send you high-quality exam-related content. 
    • We will inform you about the upcoming Masterclasses that might benefit you.
    • You can demand one free mentorship call from verified Civilsdaily mentors. 
    • You can always choose to unsubscribe. 

  • [26th February 2026] The Hindu OpED: Balancing faith, dignity and constitutional rights?

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2021] ‘Constitutional Morality’ is rooted in the Constitution itself and is founded on its essential facets. Explain the doctrine of ‘Constitutional Morality’ with the help of relevant judicial decisions.

    Linkage: The 2018 Indian Young Lawyers Association v State of Kerala invoked constitutional morality to prioritise equality and dignity over exclusionary religious practices. The ongoing review before the Supreme Court of India will determine whether constitutional morality can override denominational autonomy under Articles 25-26.

    Mentor’s Comment

    The review proceedings in the Indian Young Lawyers Association v State of Kerala reopen a foundational constitutional debate: whether courts should determine what is “essential” to religion or instead examine whether religious practices violate dignity and equality. The issue extends beyond the Sabarimala Temple and directly affects the architecture of religious freedom jurisprudence under the Supreme Court of India.

    Why in the News?

    A nine-judge Bench of the Supreme Court of India is reviewing the doctrinal basis of the 2018 Indian Young Lawyers Association v State of Kerala verdict. The Court is reconsidering whether to retain the “Essential Religious Practices” test or adopt an “anti-exclusion” framework grounded in dignity and equality. The decision will redefine the scope of Articles 14, 15, 21, 25 and 26, and clarify the limits of judicial intervention in religious practices across denominations.

    What was the 2018 Sabarimala verdict?

    1. The 2018 verdict in Indian Young Lawyers Association v State of Kerala was delivered by a 4:1 majority of the Supreme Court of India.
    2. The Court held that the practice of excluding women aged 10-50 from entering the Sabarimala Temple was unconstitutional. 
    3. The Court also struck down Rule 3(b) of the Kerala Hindu Places of Public Worship (Authorisation of Entry) Rules, 1965, which permitted the exclusion.
    4. Justice Indu Malhotra dissented, holding that matters of essential religious practice should not ordinarily be subject to judicial review unless they violate public order, morality, or health.

    What was the constitutional basis of the 2018 Sabarimala verdict?

    1. Equality Principle (Article 14): Prohibits arbitrary exclusion based on biological characteristics.
    2. Non-Discrimination (Article 15): Restricts discrimination on grounds of sex.
    3. Freedom of Religion (Article 25): Protects individual right to worship.
    4. Denominational Autonomy (Article 26): Protects rights of religious denominations subject to public order, morality, and health.
    5. Statutory Conflict: Rule 3(b) of the Kerala Hindu Places of Public Worship (Authorisation of Entry) Rules, 1965 conflicted with Section 3 of the parent Act ensuring temple entry for all Hindus.

    How has the ‘Essential Religious Practices’ doctrine shaped judicial review?

    1. Doctrinal Origin: Developed in Shirur Mutt (1954) to determine constitutional protection.
    2. Judicial Determination: Courts assess whether a practice is fundamental to religion.
    3. Theological Evaluation: Judges examine scriptures and doctrines.
    4. Case Illustration: In Sastri Yagnapurushadji vs Muldas Bhudardas Vaishya (1966), the Court interpreted Hindu doctrine to decide sect status.
    5. Institutional Concern: Converts constitutional courts into arbiters of theology.

    What are the limitations of the Essential Religious Practices test?

    1. Doctrinal Subjectivity: Lacks clear standards for determining “essentiality.”
    2. Judicial Overreach: Requires theological interpretation beyond institutional competence.
    3. Procedural Constraints: Constitutional courts lack mechanisms for detailed fact-finding and cross-examination.
    4. Dignity Conflict: Fails to address practices that may be essential yet violate individual dignity.
    5. Secularism Tension: Risks compromising state neutrality in religious matters.

    What is the proposed ‘Anti-Exclusion’ test and how does it alter constitutional analysis?

    1. Shift in Inquiry: Examines consequences of exclusion rather than essentiality.
    2. Dignity Framework (Article 21): Protects equal moral membership in society.
    3. Autonomy Balance: Respects religious autonomy unless exclusion impairs dignity or access to basic goods.
    4. Constitutional Morality: Prioritizes transformative constitutional values.
    5. Non-Theological Review: Grounds judicial scrutiny in constitutional standards, not doctrine.

    How does the review affect the broader architecture of religious freedom?

    1. Doctrinal Recalibration: May redefine relationship between Articles 25 and 26.
    2. Gender Justice Expansion: Impacts disputes involving women’s access to religious institutions.
    3. Community Governance: Influences cases involving excommunication (e.g., Dawoodi Bohra issue).
    4. Marriage and Faith: Affects questions like inter-faith marriage consequences in certain communities.
    5. Institutional Accountability: Clarifies limits of court intervention in religious affairs.

    Does the Constitution prioritize community autonomy or individual dignity?

    1. Individual as Basic Unit: Constitution treats individuals as primary rights-holders.
    2. Limited Communitarianism: Collective rights subject to fundamental rights.
    3. Transformative Vision: Constitution aims to reform discriminatory traditions.
    4. Public Order, Morality, Health: Explicit constitutional limitations on religious freedom.

    Conclusion

    The Sabarimala review marks a doctrinal turning point in religious freedom jurisprudence. A shift from theological essentiality to dignity-based scrutiny redefines the limits of judicial intervention. The outcome will determine whether constitutional courts function as arbiters of faith or guardians of equal moral membership.

  • What are carbon capture and utilization technologies?

    Why in the News?

    Carbon Capture and Utilisation (CCU) has gained attention as India advances its Draft 2030 CCUS Roadmap and aligns industrial policy with its Net Zero 2070 commitment. With India remaining the world’s third-largest CO₂ emitter and emissions concentrated in hard-to-abate sectors like cement and steel, CCU is being positioned as a key strategy to decarbonise industry while sustaining economic growth.

    What is Carbon Capture and Utilisation (CCU) and how does it function within the carbon cycle?

    1. Definition: Captures carbon dioxide (CO₂) from industrial flue gases or ambient air and converts it into usable products.
    2. Source of Capture: Extracts carbon dioxide from cement plants, steel units, power plants, chemical industries, or through Direct Air Capture (DAC).
    3. Conversion Pathways: Transforms carbon dioxide into fuels (methanol, synthetic fuels), chemicals (olefins), building materials (concrete curing), and polymers.
    4. Difference from CCS: Utilises carbon for economic value instead of permanent geological storage.
    5. Circular Carbon Economy: Recycles carbon within production systems, reducing fresh fossil extraction.

    Why has Carbon Capture and Utilisation become a governance priority in India’s decarbonisation strategy?

    1. Emission Profile: India ranks as the third-largest CO₂ emitter, with emissions concentrated in power generation, cement, steel, and chemicals.
    2. Hard-to-Abate Sectors: Industrial processes remain inherently carbon-intensive despite renewable penetration.
    3. Net-Zero Alignment: Supports India’s Net Zero 2070 target and Long-Term Low Emissions Development Strategy (LT-LEDS).
    4. Circular Economy Transition: Converts waste carbon into economic inputs, strengthening resource efficiency.
    5. Industrial Competitiveness: Enables low-carbon industrial exports amid global carbon border adjustment measures.

    How does CCU reshape industrial policy and value chains in India?

    1. Carbon as Feedstock: Converts CO₂ into fuels, chemicals, lightweight concrete blocks, olefins, and specialty chemicals.
    2. Value Chain Creation: Integrates capture, transport, conversion, and downstream manufacturing clusters.
    3. Bio-CCU Innovation: Organic Recycling Systems Limited (ORSL) leads India’s first pilot-scale Bio-CCU platform converting CO₂ from biogas into bio-alcohols.
    4. Cement Sector Adoption: JK Cement collaborates on CCU to capture CO₂ for concrete applications.
    5. Private Sector Participation: Ambuja Cements and Adani Group pilot Indo-Swedish CCU technologies at IIT Bombay.

    What institutional and regulatory measures has India initiated to support CCU deployment?

    1. Research Roadmap: Department of Science and Technology develops dedicated CCU research and development framework.
    2. Draft 2030 CCUS Roadmap: Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas identifies projects suitable for CCU deployment.
    3. Pilot Demonstration Projects: Facilitates early-stage technology validation across cement and energy sectors.
    4. Cluster-Based Approach: Recognizes need for co-located industrial clusters for CO₂ transport and utilisation.
    5. Policy Gap: Lacks carbon pricing, standards, certification mechanisms, and demand guarantees for CO₂-derived products.

    How do international policy models shape India’s CCU strategy?

    1. EU Bioeconomy Strategy: Integrates CCU into a circular economy framework for fuels, chemicals, and materials.
    2. EU Circular Economy Action Plan: Links CCU to sustainability and resource efficiency goals.
    3. U.S. Incentive Model: Combines tax credits and funding to scale CO₂-derived fuels and chemicals.
    4. Industrial Trials: ArcelorMittal (Belgium) and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries collaborate with D-CRBN to convert CO₂ into carbon monoxide for steel and chemicals.
    5. UAE Model: Al Reyadah project integrates CCU with green hydrogen for CO₂-to-chemicals hubs.

    What governance and economic risks constrain large-scale CCU adoption in India?

    1. Cost Competitiveness: Capturing, purifying, and converting CO₂ remains energy-intensive and expensive.
    2. Market Viability: CO₂-derived products struggle against cheaper fossil-based alternatives.
    3. Infrastructure Deficit: Requires reliable CO₂ transport networks and integrated industrial clusters.
    4. Regulatory Uncertainty: Absence of standards and certification creates investor hesitation.
    5. Demand-Side Weakness: Limited market signals reduce private capital mobilisation.

    Does CCU advance constitutional environmental principles and climate accountability?

    1. Article 48A: Strengthens State responsibility to protect and improve the environment.
    2. Article 51A(g): Encourages responsible environmental stewardship.
    3. Intergenerational Equity: Supports sustainable industrial growth without locking in emissions.
    4. Polluter Responsibility: Encourages industry-led carbon management mechanisms.

    Conclusion

    Carbon Capture and Utilisation (CCU) bridges the gap between industrial growth and climate responsibility. It enables decarbonisation of hard-to-abate sectors while supporting circular economy and energy security objectives. However, large-scale deployment requires cost competitiveness, regulatory clarity, infrastructure development, and market incentives. Its effectiveness will depend on coordinated policy action, technological scaling, and institutional accountability aligned with India’s Net Zero 2070 pathway.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2022] Discuss global warming and mention its effects on the global climate. Explain the control measures to bring down the level of greenhouse gases which cause global warming, in the light of the Kyoto Protocol, 1997.

    Linkage: Carbon Capture and Utilisation (CCU) directly fits under Kyoto Protocol-based mitigation mechanisms aimed at reducing industrial greenhouse gas emissions. It represents a technology-driven control measure to decarbonise hard-to-abate sectors while aligning with global climate commitments.

More posts