đŸ’„Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF

Subject: Economics

  • Global Chip Shortage and Related Issues

    CEOs of AMD, Nvidia and Intel have said at different forums last year that the chip situation will remain tight for the rest of 2022.

    Genesis of shortage

    • After reaching its peak in 2011, the laptop market growth slowed down with the rise of alternatives such as smartphones and tablets.
    • Then, the pandemic hit.
    • People switched to work from home, children connected to schools through laptops, and get-togethers happened over video calls.
    • This shift led to a surge in demand for laptops and tablets.
    • The stay-at-home rules also made several people pick up console-based learning and gaming.
    • Each of these devices were in high demand and are run on thumbnail-sized semiconductors, performing various functions on a single device.

    Also read:

    [Sansad TV] Perspective: Semiconductor Industry & India

    What led to the production anomaly?

    • Manufacturers produce them as 200mm or 300mm wafers. These are further split into lots of tiny chips.
    • While the larger wafers are expensive and mostly used for advanced equipment, the devices that were in high demand needed smaller diameter wafers.
    • But the manufacturing equipment needed to make them were in short supply even before the pandemic began.
    • Industry is moving in the direction of 5G and advanced communication, which requires expensive wafers.
    • High consumer demand for low-end products, coupled with large orders from tech firms chocked chip makers whose factories were also closed during lockdowns.
    • As the industry gradually tried to pull itself out of the supply crunch, and logistical complexities have exacerbated the problem.

    Impact of Ukrainian War

    • Separately, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has strained exports of essential commodities used to make chip sets.
    • Moscow supplies rare materials like palladium, and Kyiv sells rare gases to make semiconductor fab lasers.
    • This combination is required to build chipsets that power a range of devices, from automobiles to smartphones.

    Global supply chain

    • About a decade and half back, semiconductors barely drew attention from large companies that have now come to rely on the thumbnail-sized semiconductor piece.
    • During this period, firms developed a system to make chip sets.
    • The system was made by interconnecting several parts of the world to make a single device.
    • It is what we now call as the global supply chain.

    How intricate is this network?

    • Semiconductor manufacturing involves roughly 25 countries in the direct supply chain, and 23 countries in allied functions, according to a joint study by Global Semiconductor Alliance and Accenture.
    • The report estimates a semiconductor-based product could cross international borders about 70 times before finally making it to the end customer.
    • Wafer fabrication is the most globally dispersed, with 39 countries directly involved in the supply chain and 34 involved in allied activity.
    • They provide services like photolithography, etching and cleaning.
    • Designing happens across 12 countries; product testing and manufacturing each are done across 25 countries.

    COVID is the only raison d’ĂȘtre

    • Supply chain dynamics back fired due to the pandemic, and the recent geopolitical events.
    • When the pandemic began, carmakers stopped requesting chips from suppliers due to low demand for new vehicles.
    • And now, as they ramp up production to meet consumer demand, chip makers are down on supply because they have cut deals with other industries.
    • As the geopolitical events in Central Europe and production shutdowns in China continue to add pressure to the already complicated semiconductor supply chain.

     

    UPSC 2023 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • Supreme Court’s ruling on GST deepens the churn in the tax regime

    Context

    Last week, the Supreme Court ruled that the decisions taken by the GST Council are merely recommendations with “persuasive value” and are not binding.

    GST as a advisory body

    • The court has rejected the Centre’s contention that the entire structure of GST would crumble if the Council’s decisions were not treated as enforceable.
    • In some ways, the verdict states the obvious.
    • Article 246-A inserted after the 122nd constitutional amendment states, “Notwithstanding anything contained in articles 246 and 254, Parliament, and, subject to clause (2), the Legislature of every state, have the power to make laws with respect to the GST imposed by the Union or by such state.”
    • Thus, the power to levy the central GST (CGST) vests with Parliament, the power to levy state GST (SGST) vests with state legislatures and Parliament has exclusive power to make laws with respect to the GST on items that are part of inter-state trade or commerce.
    •  Thus, the GST Council is only an advisory body and the actual decisions regarding model GST levies, principles of levy, apportionment of GST levied on inter-state supplies, principles relating to place of supply, exemptions and rate structure and any special provisions will have to be taken by either Parliament in the case of CGST and IGST or the states in the case of SGST.
    • In effect, decisions on the structure and operation of the tax can be made by the Centre and individual states without discussion and deliberation in the Council and both can ignore any recommendation made by the Council.
    • The judgment reiterates that the sovereign right to levy the tax still exists with the Union and state governments and it is for them to consider the recommendations of the Council.
    • The chance of having a harmonised GST and reforms in the tax regime will crucially depend upon continued negotiation and bargaining between the Union and states.
    • Intergovernmental cooperation has been kept alive to ensure a harmonised GST and unless both the Centre and the states see the gains, reforms will be hard to come by and if the Centre desires the reforms more than the states, it will have to ensure a “buy in” from the states to agree for the reform.

    Implications of the judgement

    • Given that the GST Council has been declared as only an advisory body with a persuasive value, what happens to the dream of having a harmonised one nation, one tax, if a state or a group of states decides to deviate?
    • But the judgment paves the way for more intensive bargaining and negotiations, placing states on an equal footing with the Centre in taking decisions on the structure and operations of the tax.
    • At present, decisions get approved in the GST Council when passed by a majority of three-fourths of the weighted votes of the members present and voting, with the Centre having one-third weight and individual states (and UTs) having an equal share of the remaining two-thirds weight.
    • However, in the past, all decisions in the Council have been taken by consensus (except in the case of determining the rate on lotteries), and the Supreme Court decision reinforces this convention.
    • The immediate impact of this will be bargaining by states for extending the period of compensation for the loss of revenue.
    •  As the five-year period of compensation gets over at the end of June, this decision will now help the states to bargain hard for the extension.

    Way forward

    •  Though the period of collecting compensation cess has been extended till March 2026 to meet the interest and repayment requirements of the funds borrowed from the RBI to meet the compensation requirements, the lasting solution lies in increasing the revenue productivity of the tax by pruning the list of exempted items, rationalising the rates and taking administrative measures.
    • These reforms will require strengthening the cooperative spirit.

    Conclusion

    This has come at a time when reforms have to be set in motion and hopefully, the Court’s decision will strengthen the cooperative spirit in reforming the domestic consumption tax system in the country.

    UPSC 2023 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • What is the Service Charge levied by Restaurants on Customers?

    The Centre has called a meeting of restaurant owners over service charge levied by them on customers.

    Why in news?

    • The restaurants are collecting service charges from consumers by default, even though collection of any such charge is voluntary and at the discretion of consumers and not mandatory as per law.

    What are the components of a food bill?

    • A restaurant bill in India comprises food charge (from the menu), with an addition of service charge (anywhere between 5 to 15 per cent) and a 5 per cent GST on this amount (IGST+SGST).
    • This is for all kinds of standalone restaurants.
    • In case a restaurant is located inside a hotel wherein room rate is upwards of Rs 7,500 (mostly in case of five-stars), the GST would be 18 per cent.

    Nature of Service charge

    • While the GST is a mandatory component as per law, the service charge is supposed to be optional.
    • It is the equivalent of what is known as gratuity around the world, or tip, in casual parlance.
    • Most restaurants decide the service charge on their own, and print it at the bottom of the menu with an asterisk.

    Policy measures

    • The Ministry of Consumer Affairs had come out with “Guidelines on Fair Trade Practices Related to Charging of Service Charge from Consumers by Hotels/ Restaurants”.
    • Here it was clearly mentioned that a component of service is inherent in the provision of food and beverages ordered by a customer.
    • Hence the pricing of the product is expected to cover both the goods and service components.
    • It said that the bill “may clearly display that service charge is voluntary, and the service charge column of the bill may be left blank for the customer to fill up before making payment.”

    What do the restaurants say?

    • The levy of service charge by a restaurant is a matter of individual policy to decide if it is to be charged or not.
    • There is no illegality in levying such a charge.
    • Once the customer is made aware of such a charge in advance and then decides to place the order, it becomes an agreement between the parties, and is not an unfair trade practice.
    • GST is also paid on the said charge to the Government.

    Where does the fund go?

    • Restaurants claim that a major chunk of the service charge thus collected goes to the staff, while the rest goes towards a welfare fund to help them out during good and bad times.
    • It’s a default billing option, even as customers can choose not to pay it if they don’t want to.
    • Of course, they are paid the salaries but the service charge works as an incentive for them.
    • Restaurateurs also say that patrons can decide not to pay the charge and tip the server directly, but in this case, the backroom staff doesn’t get anything.
    • A service charge ensures all staff members are rewarded evenly.

    What is the issue then?

    • The issue is that almost all restaurants have put service charge (fixed at their own accord) as a default billing option.
    • And if a consumer is aware that it is not compulsory and wants it removed or wants to tip the server directly, the onus is on them to convince the management why they don’t want to pay it.
    • The department says they received several complaints saying it leads to public embarrassment and spoils the dining experience since at the end of it, they either pay the charge quietly and exit the place feeling cheated, or have to try hard to get it removed.
    • Also, there is no transparency as to where this charge goes.
    • The officials also say that collecting service charge on their own and paying GST on it to the government doesn’t make it authorised.

    Problems faced by customers

    • It is this component which has come under dispute from time to time, with consumers arguing they are not bound to pay it.
    • It also said that hotels and restaurants charging tips from customers without their express consent in the name of service charges amounts to unfair trade practice.

     

    UPSC 2023 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • The message from the government’s wheat export ban

    Context

    The ban on the export of wheat was not unexpected. The rather ambivalent approach to agriculture comes out clearly with this move.

    Understanding how this ban has come about

    • We are not comfortable with market forces operating in agriculture.
    • Nor are we quite sure whether we want the farmer to get a better price or the consumer to pay less.
    • Governments spend a lot of money in the form of subsidies to ensure farmers are enthused to produce more wheat.
    • The Centre keeps increasing the MSP for this purpose and states often pay a bonus for procurement.
    • There are political reasons too as the farmer lobby needs to be placated.
    •  There are political reasons too as the farmer lobby needs to be placated.
    • We have been taking credit for the production of wheat and every year we set a new record.
    • This year, the Ministry announced that wheat production will touch a record of 111 million tonnes, which has recently been revised downwards.
    • With the war, conditions have changed. Russia and Ukraine are large producers of wheat and their supply to world markets has been cut off due to sanctions and supply chain disruptions.
    • With supplies interrupted, there is an opportunity for other surplus nations to step in.
    • But the disruption has caused world prices to rise significantly.

    Opportunity for India

    • The World Bank data indicates that the price of US (soft red winter) wheat has gone up from $328/tonne in December to $672/tonne while US (hard red winter) wheat is up from $377 to $496/tonne.
    • Countries that produce abundant wheat now have a chance to leverage this opportunity to export.
    • However, in case of India it does appear that production will be lower than expected.
    • Low wheat stock: The government has also not been able to procure wheat as farmers are no longer selling at MSP (which is at Rs 2,015/quintal) as they are getting higher prices in mandis.
    • As of May 10, procurement was just 18 million tonnes against 43 million tonnes last year.
    • This is a significant fall.
    • But stocks with the Centre and other state agencies are 30.3 million tonnes, way above the buffer norms of 27.6 million tonnes.
    • The ban on wheat exports is because of this.

    Two constraints on the wheat economy

    • In 2007 and again in 2021, the government banned futures trading in wheat on grounds that it led to speculative pressure on prices even though the quantity traded and the open interest were minuscule.
    • At that time, it was a decline in expected output which triggered this action.
    • It does look like the wheat economy will continue to operate within two constraints that have become barriers to commercialisation.
    • MSP and government procurement: The first is MSP and government procurement, which feeds into the public distribution system.
    • Arhatiya system: The second is the arhatiya system of trading where middlemen have come in the way of any reform.

    Suggestions

    • Abolish MSP and procurement system: The MSP and procurement system needs to be dismantled.
    • Cash transfers: As the government has successfully expanded both the Aadhaar and Jan Dhan programmes, there should be simple cash transfers to beneficiaries.
    • Buffer stocks can be held to ease distress during a crisis, but government involvement should stop there.
    • Procuring unlimited quantities of wheat and keeping huge stocks has distorted the wheat matrix.
    • The mandi system too needs to be revisited and alternatives have to be made available so that farmers can choose the point of sale.

    Conclusion

    We have been talking about being a part of global supply chains to augment value addition and accelerate growth. But when it comes to agriculture it is a blow-hot blow-cold approach. This not only affects our credibility but also sends confusing signals to producers as to what is the best way out for them.

    UPSC 2023 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • FDI inflow ‘highest ever’ at $83.57 bn

    The foreign direct investment (FDI) in the financial year 2021-22 has touched a “highest-ever” figure of $83.57 billion.

    Get aware with the recently updated FDI norms. Key facts mentioned in this newscard can make a direct statement based MCQ in the prelims.

    Ex. FDI source in decreasing order: Singapore – Mauritius – Netherland – Ceyman Islands – Japan – France

    What is Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)?

    • An FDI is an investment in the form of a controlling ownership in a business in one country by an entity based in another country.
    • It is thus distinguished from a foreign portfolio investment by a notion of direct control.
    • FDI may be made either “inorganically” by buying a company in the target country or “organically” by expanding the operations of an existing business in that country.
    • Broadly, FDI includes “mergers and acquisitions, building new facilities, reinvesting profits earned from overseas operations, and intra company loans”.
    • In a narrow sense, it refers just to building a new facility, and lasting management interest.

    FDI in India

    • Foreign investment was introduced in 1991 under Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA), driven by then FM Manmohan Singh.
    • There are two routes by which India gets FDI.

    1) Automatic route: By this route, FDI is allowed without prior approval by Government or RBI.

    2) Government route: Prior approval by the government is needed via this route. The application needs to be made through Foreign Investment Facilitation Portal, which will facilitate the single-window clearance of FDI application under Approval Route.

    • India imposes a cap on equity holding by foreign investors in various sectors, current FDI in aviation and insurance sectors is limited to a maximum of 49%.
    • In 2015 India overtook China and the US as the top destination for the Foreign Direct Investment.

    Features of FDI

    • Any investment from an individual or firm that is located in a foreign country into a country is FDI.
    • Generally, FDI is when a foreign entity acquires ownership or controlling stake in the shares of a company in one country, or establishes businesses there.
    • It is different from foreign portfolio investment where the foreign entity merely buys equity shares of a company.
    • In FDI, the foreign entity has a say in the day-to-day operations of the company.
    • FDI is not just the inflow of money, but also the inflow of technology, knowledge, skills and expertise.
    • It is a major source of non-debt financial resources for the economic development of a country.

    Significance of rising FDI

    • This is a testament of India’s status among global investors.

    Recent amendments in 2020

    • The govt. has amended para 3.1.1 of extant FDI policy as contained in Consolidated FDI Policy, 2017.
    • In the event of the transfer of ownership of any existing or future FDI in an entity in India, directly or indirectly, resulting in the beneficial ownership, such subsequent change in beneficial ownership will also require Government approval.

    The present position and revised position in the matters will be as under:

    Present Position

    • A non-resident entity can invest in India, subject to the FDI Policy except in those sectors/activities which are prohibited.
    • However, a citizen of Bangladesh or an entity incorporated in Bangladesh can invest only under the Government route.
    • Further, a citizen of Pakistan or an entity incorporated in Pakistan can invest, only under the Government route, in sectors/activities other than defence, space, atomic energy and sectors/activities prohibited for foreign investment.

    Revised Position

    • A non-resident entity can invest in India, subject to the FDI Policy except in those sectors/activities which are prohibited.

    [spot the difference]

    • However, an entity of a country, which shares a land border with India or where the beneficial owner of investment into India is situated in or is a citizen of any such country, can invest only under the Government route.
    • Further, a citizen of Pakistan or an entity incorporated in Pakistan can invest, only under the Government route, in sectors/activities other than defence, space, atomic energy and sectors/activities prohibited for foreign investment.

    In response to China

    • China accused that India’s recently adopted policy goes against the principles of the World Trade Organisation (WTO).
    • It tends to violate WTO’s principle of non-discrimination, and go against the general trend of liberalisation and facilitation of trade and investment.

     

    UPSC 2023 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • What is Pravaig Field Pack?

    A Bengaluru-based venture has produced a rugged tactical battery that it is now planning to sell to the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) forces in Europe.

    Pravaig Field Pack

    • It is a heavy-duty power bank that is portable and weighs 14 kilograms.
    • It is of great utility to the digitally connected modern military and Special Forces personnel who have to operate in high-risk zones while using gadgets that require constant power back-up.
    • These batteries are designed, engineered and made in India.
    • The field pack can be used to charge a MacBook 60 times.

    Significance of Pravaig

    • This supply marks a major shift in the defense landscape of India — a tipping point in the reversal of India’s high technology defense industry, from users to developers, from importers to exporters.
    • The field pack can be used to energize a military person’s field duties and it can be used to deploy remote sensors.
    • A powerful tactical battery can be used even to operate larger military equipment such as drones and it can even help coordinate tactical operations which involve multiple weapons systems.

     

    UPSC 2023 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • Government lacking a coherent policy of food security

    Context

    The Government of India announced a sudden ban on export of wheat on May 13, 2022, a few days after Prime Minister Narendra Modi had stated that “at a time when the world is facing a shortage of wheat, the farmers of India have stepped forward to feed the world”.

    What led to the sudden wheat export ban?

    • Low public procurement: The sudden turnaround in the export policy appears to be on account of fears that low public procurement would affect domestic food security.
    • This summer, procurement of wheat by the Food Corporation of India (FCI) has been very low.
    • Last year, the FCI and other agencies procured 43.34 million tonnes of wheat.
    • For the current season, procurement has only been 17.8 million tonnes, as of May 10, 2022.
    • Given the low levels of procurement, the Government has reduced the procurement target for the current season from 44.4 to 19.5 million tonnes.
    • Low production: While wheat production this year has been lower than estimated on account of high heat and other factors in March, there is not a big shortfall in production relative to previous years.
    • Wheat production was 103.6 million tonnes in 2018-19, 107.8 million tonnes in 2019-20, and 109.5 million tonnes in 2020-21.
    • The most recent estimate of production for 2021-22, revised downwards from the earlier estimate, is 105.

    Public procurement in India

    • The system of public procurement has been in place since the mid-1960s, and has been the backbone of food policy in India.
    • As part of the liberalisation policy, many other economists suggested that food stocks be run down in India and that needs of food security be met through world trade and the Chicago futures market.

    Need for effective PDS

    • Higher than buffer stock norm: Stocks of wheat in the central pool as of April 30, 2022 were 30.3 million tonnes, much lower than the 52.5 million tonnes of last year, but comfortably higher than buffer stock norms.
    • While the Government procurement in this marketing season has been lower than the previous two years, the stock position so far is similar to 2019, when we had 35.8 million tonnes of stock in April.
    • An important role in pandemic: In the two COVID-19 years (2020-21 and 2021-22), the Public Distribution System (PDS) played a stellar role, and, its role showed the wisdom of not dismantling it.
    • Total offtake of rice and wheat was 102.3 million tonnes in 2021-22 when distribution through the PDS and other welfare schemes is combined.
    • It is essential that the PDS and open market operations be used to cool down food price inflation.
    •  While most States have high inflation rates, States with better PDS, such as Kerala and Tamil Nadu, have low inflation rates.

    Way forward

    • Provide remunerative prices: To promote production, a key aspect of food policy in India has been to provide remunerative prices to farmers.
    • As is well known, after the reports of the National Commission on Farmers, the announced minimum support price (MSP) for wheat has often been inadequate to cover costs of cultivation for several regions and classes of farmers, especially if comprehensive costs (or Cost C2) are taken as the base. 
    • Over the last two years, costs of production have risen sharply, one important component being the spiralling price of fuel.

    Conclusion

    India’s flip-flop on the export of wheat is an example of the Government lacking a coherent policy of food security.

    UPSC 2023 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • Agri-exports

    Context

    In the fiscal year 2021-22 (FY22), agri-exports scaled an all-time high of $50.3 billion, registering a growth of 20 per cent over the preceding year.

    What are the contributing factors?

    • The all time high agri-export was made possible largely by rising global commodity prices, but also by the favourable and aggressive export policy of the Ministry of Commerce and its various export promotion agencies like APEDA, MPEDA, and commodity boards.
    • Sustainability issue: From a strategic point of view, an important question that arises is how sustainable is this growth in agri-exports, given India’s resource endowments and the country’s domestic needs?
    • To answer this question rationally, let us first look at the composition of agri-exports.

    Composition of agri-exports

    • Among the several agri-commodities exported in FY22, rice ranks first with exports of $9.6 billion in value (with 21.2 million metric tonnes (MMT) in quantity).
    • It is followed by marine products worth $7.7 billion (1.4 MMT), sugar worth $4.6 billion (10.4 MMT), spices worth $3.9 billion (1.4 MMT) and bovine (buffalo) meat worth $3.3 billion (1.18 MMT) (see figure).
    • Concerns with Rice and Sugar: Of these, two commodities, rice and sugar, are water guzzlers and serious thought should be given to their global competitiveness and environmental sustainability.

    Competitiveness and environmental sustainability concerns with Sugar and Rice cultivation

    • India’s exports of 21 MMT constituted 41 per cent of a global rice market of 51.3 MMT.
    • Low export price: When most of the other commodity prices were surging in global markets, the price of rice (Thailand supplies 25 per cent) collapsed by about 13 per cent from $484/tonne in April 2021 to $429/tonne in April 2022, largely due to India’s massive exports.
    • This means that India had to export a greater quantity of rice to get the same amount of dollars.
    • In trade theory, it is a classic case for levying the optimal export tax of 5 to 10 per cent.
    • Optimal export: India should optimally not go beyond 12 to 15 MMT of rice exports, else the marginal revenue from exports will keep falling.
    • Subsidised water: Taking an average of about 4,000 litres of water per kg of rice, and assuming that half of this percolates into groundwater, exporting 21MMT of rice would mean the virtual export of 42 billion cubic meters (m3) of water.
    • Sugar is another water guzzler, whose exports touched 10.4 MMT in FY22.
    • Subsidies crossing WTO limits: It was backed partly by subsidies (including export subsidy) that crossed the 10 per cent limit mandated by the World Trade Organisation, bringing India into a dispute with other sugar exporting countries at the WTO.
    • However, from a sustainability point of view, we must note that exporting one kg of sugar amounts to roughly exporting 2,000 litres of virtual water.
    • That means in FY22, India exported at least 20 billion m3 of water through sugar exports.
    • So, by exporting 21 MMT of rice and 10 MMT of sugar in FY22, India exported at least 62 billion cubic meters of virtual water.
    • Much of this water is extracted from groundwater — as is being done in much of the Punjab and Haryana belt (for rice), where the water table is receding by 9.2 metres and 7 metres over the last two decades (2000-19), and in Maharashtra and Uttar Pradesh for sugar.
    • This can lead to a water disaster. 
    • Anthropogenic methane emission: Rice production systems are among the most important sources of anthropogenic methane emissions, contributing to 17.5 per cent of GHG emissions generated from agriculture (2021).
    •  This is all because of the distortionary policies of free power and highly-subsidised fertilisers, especially urea.

    Way forward: Support farmers smartly

    • AWD and DSR: Innovative farming practices such as alternate wetting drying (AWD), direct seeded rice (DSR) that can save up to 25-30 per cent water and micro-irrigation that can save up to 50 per cent irrigation water, could be game-changing technologies in reducing the crop’s carbon footprint.
    • Switching to other crops: The real solution lies in incentivising the farmers to switch some of the area under rice and sugar cultivation to other, less water-guzzling crops.
    • Haryana has come up with two schemes, Mera Pani, Meri Virasat and Kheti Khaali, Fir Bhi Khushali.
    • A closer evaluation of non-basmati rice exports brings out another interesting fact.
    • The unit value of these exports was just $354/tonne, which is below the MSP of rice ($390/tonne).
    • One possibility is that a substantial part of the supplies through the PDS and PM Garib Kalyan Anna Yojana (PMGKAY) are leaking out and swelling rice exports.
    • Introduce the option of direct cash transfer: From a policy angle, it may be high time to introduce the option of direct cash transfers in lieu of almost free grains under the PDS and PMGKAY.
    • This will help plug leakages as well as save costs.

    Conclusion

    The best way to tackle this upcoming environmental disaster would be to support farmers smartly, by giving them aggregate input subsidy support on a per hectare basis and freeing up the input prices of fertilisers and power to be determined by market forces and their costs of production.

    UPSC 2023 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • What is ‘Storage Gain’ in Wheat?

    Punjab’s state procurement agencies (SPAs) are seeking a waiver of ‘storage gain’.

    What is ‘storage gain’ in wheat?

    • Wheat, considered a ‘living grain’, tends to gain some weight during storage.
    • This is known as ‘storage gain’ and it mostly happens due to absorption of moisture.
    • There are three parts of the grain — bran (outer layer rich in fibre), germ (inner layer rich in nutrients) and endosperm (bulk of the kernel which contains minerals and vitamins).
    • The moisture is mostly absorbed by the endosperm.

    Who compensates whom for ‘storage gain’?

    • State procurement agencies, which purchase and store wheat at their facilities, are required to give one kg wheat extra per quintal to the Food Corporation of India (FCI).
    • While 20% of wheat, procured by the FCI and the SPAs, is moved immediately after procurement.
    • It is usually on the remaining 80%, which is moved out after July 1 every year that storage gain has to be accounted for due to longer storage duration.

     

    UPSC 2023 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • States have equal powers to make GST-related Laws: SC

    The Supreme Court has held that Union and State legislatures have equal, simultaneous and unique powers to make laws on Goods and Services Tax (GST) and the recommendations of the GST Council are not binding on them.

    What is the case?

    • The apex court’s decision came while confirming a Gujarat High Court ruling that the Centre cannot levy Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) on ocean freight from Indian importers.

    Key takeaways of the Judgment

    • The recommendations of the GST Council are the product of a collaborative dialogue involving the Union and the States.
    • They are recommendatory in nature. They only have a persuasive value.
    • To regard them as binding would disrupt fiscal federalism when both the Union and the States are conferred equal power to legislate on GST.

    Basis of the Judgment

    • The court emphasised that Article 246A of the Constitution gives the States power to make laws with respect to GST.
    • It treats the Union and the States as “equal units”.
    • It confers a simultaneous power (on Union and States) for enacting laws on GST.
    • Article 279A, in constituting the GST Council, envisions that neither the Centre nor the States are actually dependent on the other.

    What are the articles added/modified to the Constitution by the GST Act?

    (1) Article 246A: Special Provision for GST

    • This Article was newly inserted to give power to the Parliament and the respective State/Union Legislatures to make laws on GST respectively imposed by each of them.
    • However, the Parliament of India is given the exclusive power to make laws with respect to inter-state supplies.
    • The IGST Act deals with inter-state supplies. Thus, the power to make laws under the IGST Act will rest exclusively with the Parliament.
    • Further, the article excludes the following products from the scope of GST until a date recommended by the GST Council:
    1. Petroleum Crude
    2. High-Speed Diesel
    3. Motor Spirit
    4. Natural Gas
    5. Aviation Turbine Fuel

    (2) Article 269A: Levy and Collection of GST for Inter-State Supply

    • While Article 246A gives the Parliament the exclusive power to make laws with respect to inter-state supplies.
    • The manner of distribution of revenue from such supplies between the Centre and the State is covered in Article 269A.
    • It allows the GST Council to frame rules in this regard. Import of goods or services will also be called as inter-state supplies.
    • This gives the Central Government the power to levy IGST on import transactions.
    • Import of goods was subject to Countervailing Duty (CVD) in the earlier scheme of taxation.
    • IGST levy helps a taxpayer to avail the credit of IGST paid on import along the supply chain, which was not possible before.

    (3) Article 279A: GST Council

    • This Article gives power to the President to constitute a joint forum of the Centre and States called the GST Council.
    • The GST Council is an apex member committee to modify, reconcile or to procure any law or regulation based on the context of GST in India.

    (4) Article 286: Restrictions on Tax Imposition

    • This was an existing article which restricted states from passing any law that allowed them to collect tax on sale or purchase of goods either outside the state or in the case of import transactions.
    • It was further amended to restrict the passing of any laws in case of services too.
    • Further, the term ‘supply’ replaces ‘sale or purchase’.

    (5) Article 366: Addition of Important definitions

    Article 366 was an existing article amended to include the following definitions:

    1. GST means the tax on supply of goods, services or both. It is important to note that the supply of alcoholic liquor for human consumption is excluded from the purview of GST.
    2. Services refer to anything other than goods.
    3. State includes Union Territory with legislature.

    Back2Basics: GST Council

    • The GST Council is a federal body that aims to bring together states and the Centre on a common platform for the nationwide rollout of the indirect tax reform.
    • It is an apex member committee to modify, reconcile or to procure any law or regulation based on the context of goods and services tax in India.
    • The GST Council dictates tax rate, tax exemption, the due date of forms, tax laws, and tax deadlines, keeping in mind special rates and provisions for some states.
    • The predominant responsibility of the GST Council is to ensure to have one uniform tax rate for goods and services across the nation.

    How is the GST Council structured?

    • The GST is governed by the GST Council. Article 279 (1) of the amended Indian Constitution states that the GST Council has to be constituted by the President within 60 days of the commencement of the Article 279A.
    • According to the article, the GST Council will be a joint forum for the Centre and the States. It consists of the following members:
    1. The Union Finance Minister will be the Chairperson
    2. As a member, the Union Minister of State will be in charge of Revenue of Finance
    3. The Minister in charge of finance or taxation or any other Minister nominated by each State government, as members.

    Terms of reference

    • Article 279A (4) specifies that the Council will make recommendations to the Union and the States on the important issues related to GST, such as the goods and services will be subject or exempted from the Goods and Services Tax.
    • They lay down GST laws, principles that govern the following:
    1. Place of Supply
    2. Threshold limits
    3. GST rates on goods and services
    4. Special rates for raising additional resources during a natural calamity or disaster
    5. Special GST rates for certain States

     

    UPSC 2023 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)