đŸ’„Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Subject: Economics

  • [op-ed of the day] Delhi-Davos disconnect-India must find ways to take advantage of new opportunities

    Context

    Given its increased heft in the global economic order, India ought to be at the leading edge of the current debate of the future of capitalism.

    The emergence of “stakeholder capitalism”

    • Interests of all shareholder: Klaus Schwab, who founded the World Economic Forum 50 years ago, wants capitalists to look beyond their shareholders and consider the interests of all the stakeholders.
      • Long overdue debate: Some hope that the debate on stakeholder capitalism is a long-overdue recognition of the capitalist excesses of recent decades.
    • Generating value for customers: Last August, the Business Roundtable in the US, which brings together some of the top American corporates, said American companies must now generate value for customers.
      • Invest in their employees.
      • Deal fairly with suppliers and support the communities in which they operate even as they service their shareholders.
    • Scepticism over “interests of all shareholders”: Sceptics say that this is a nice way of saying the right things, repackaging old ideas on corporate social responsibility and creating illusions about reforming capitalism.
      • Cynics insist that it will be business as usual for the world’s capitalists.
      • Reflection of deeper crisis: Beyond this divide between optimists and pessimists, the discourse on “stakeholder capitalism” is a reflection of the deeper crisis afflicting the global economy today.

    Three major challenges according to WEF

    • In its annual survey on global risks, the WEF has identified many challenges. Three of them stand out.
    • First Challenge: Polarised politics
      • In the US Trump is unlikely to be defensive.
      • While the dominant sentiments see Trump as the very embodiment of nationalism and populism that are polarising politics around the world.
      • Others point to the structural conditions that have bred these forces.
      • America’s working-class whose wages haven’t risen in decades, whose jobs are less secure than ever rallied behind Trump.
      • Politics in the US: Much the same happened in the British elections last year.
      • Tory leader Boris Johnson won a sweeping mandate by breaking into the working-class strongholds of the Labour Party.
    • Second Challenge: Trade war
      • Trump had a long record of denouncing free trade.
      • Many had hoped that Trump will moderate his anti-globalist rhetoric once in office.
      • Attack on a core principle of globalisation: Trump has taken a pickaxe to the core principles of the globalised economic order – free trade, open borders and multilateralism.
      • Renegotiating the treaties: The US has renegotiated a 25-year old trade agreement with America’s neighbours, Canada and Mexico.
      • The threat of all-out-trade war with China: Trump’s threat of an all-out trade war with China over the last couple of years has led to an interim agreement.
      • The agreement commits Beijing to reduce its trade surplus with the US by importing more.
      • The trade deficit of the US with EU: At Davos, Trump is expected to turn his ire on the EU, which has a near $200 billion trade surplus with the US.
    • Third challenge: Technology
      • War in technology domain: The trade wars among the world’s major capitalist centres is accentuated by the technological revolution, especially in the digital domain.
      • Need for coordination: The Davos report on global risks argues that the realisation of the full potential of new technologies depends on unprecedented coordination among all stakeholders.
      • Digital fragmentation: What is emerging instead is “digital fragmentation” marked by the extension of geopolitical and geo-economic rivalries into the new domain.
      • Digital issues have come to the front and centre of American arguments with Europe.

    Conclusion

    • India must find ways to take advantage of the new opportunities from the unfolding rearrangement of the global capitalist system.

     

  • [op-ed snap] Redesigning India’s ailing data system

    Context

    As official statistics is a public good, giving information about the state of the economy and success of governance, it needs to be independent to be impartial.

    GDP calculation and its significance

    • What is GDP:
      • Assigning a value to products and services: In effect, it adds apples and oranges, tractors and sickles, trade, transport, storage and communication, real estate, banking and government services through the mechanism of value.
      • GDP covers all productive activity for producing goods and services, without duplication.
      • The System of National Accounting (SNA): It is designed to measure production, consumption, and accumulation of income and wealth for assessing the performance of the economy.
    • What is the significance of GDP data?
      • Influence the market: GDP data influence markets, signalling investment sentiments, the flow of funds and balance of payments.
      • The input-output relations impact productivity and allocation of resources.
      • Demand and supply influences prices, exchange rates, wage rates, employment and standard of living, affecting all walks of life.
    • Issues over the present series of GDP:
      • Nominal GDP: The data on GDP are initially estimated at a current price known as nominal GDP.
      • Real GDP: Nominal GDP minus the inflation effect is real GDP.
      • Price Index: There is a way of adjusting inflation effect through an appropriate price index.
      • Pricing series issue with the service sector: The present series encountered serious problems for the price adjustment, specifically for the services sector contributing about 60% of GDP.
      • Absence of price index: There is an absence of appropriate price indices for most service sectors.
      • What the absence of series means: The deflators used in the new series could not effectively separate out price effect from the current value to arrive at a real volume estimate at a constant price.
      • Methodical issue: Replacing Annual Survey of Industries (ASI) with the Ministry of Corporate Affairs MCA21 posed serious data and methodological issues.

    Need for the change in the approach of data collection

    • The approach for the collection of data remains largely the same for long.
      • Price and production indices are constructed using a fixed base Laspeyres Index.
      • The yield rate for paddy is estimated by crop cutting experiments.
      • The organisation of field surveys for collection of data on employment-unemployment, consumer expenditure, industrial output, assets and liabilities continue.
    • Why data collection for yields need to change?
      • Productivity and remunerative price of output are major concerns for agriculture.
      • Data collection from diverse factors: It is necessary to collect data on factors such as soil conditions, moisture, temperature, water and fertilizer use determining yield, the impact of intermediary and forward trade on farm gate price and so on.
      • Israel collects these data for analysis to support productivity.
      • Need to leverage the e-governance: The initiative under e-governance enabled the capturing of huge data, which need to be collated for their meaningful use for the production of official statistics.

    Data Logistics

    • Need of data from the other areas: Along with GDP, we need data to assess-
      • Inclusive growth.
      • Fourth-generation Industrial Revolution riding on the Internet of things.
      • Robotics-influencing employment and productivity.
      • Environmental protection.
      • Sustainable development and social welfare.
    • How to deal with the data inconsistency
      • We need systems which have the capability to sift through a huge volume of data seamlessly to look for reliability, validity, consistency and coherence.
      • Such a system is possible through a versatile data warehouse as a component of big–data technology.
      • Rangarajan Committee recommendation: Setting up of such system has been wanting as thoughtful and well-meaning key recommendations of the Rangarajan Commission and subsequent recommendations from 2006 onwards by successive National Statistical Commissions.

    Way forward

    • The need for a new system: The present national accounting and analytical framework miss out on many important dimensions of the economy.
      • We need a new framework for analysis for such a complex system and evolutionary process.
      • The system needs to take into account automation, robotisation and other labour-replacing technologies affecting profitability, structural change and general welfare.
    • Need to find alternative avenues for the unemployed and jobs lost: In order to inject efficiency and stability, there is a need to have detailed data on how: markets clear, prices are formed, risks build-up, institutions function and, in turn, influence the lifestyle of various sections of the people.
    • Knowing market microstructure: It is also needed to know in greater detail about market microstructure and optimality therein, the role of technology and advanced research, changing demand on human skills, and enterprise and organising ability.
    • Monopoly must be contained:  The loss caused to the economy through monopoly power, inefficient input-output mix, dumping, obsolete technology and product mix must be contained.
    • Ensure distribution of wealth: The consensus macroeconomic framework of analysis assumes symmetric income distribution and does not get into the depth of structural issues.
      • In the changed situation of availability of microdata, there is a need to build a system to integrate the micro with the macro, maintaining distributional characteristics.

    Conclusion

    Data is the new oil in the modern networked economy in pursuit of socio-economic development. The economics now is deeply rooted in data, measuring and impacting competitiveness, risks, opportunities and social welfare in an integrated manner, going much beyond macroeconomics. There is a need for commitment to producing these statistics transparently.

     

     

  • [op-ed snap] Why ‘Make in India’ has failed

    Context

    Five years after its launch its appropriate time to take the stock of the progress made by ‘Make in India’.

    Three major objectives of the initiative

    • First- Manufacturing growth rate at 12-14 %: The first objective is to increase the manufacturing sector’s growth rate to 12-14% per annum in order to increase the sector’s share in the economy.
    • Second-100 million jobs: The second objective is to create 100 million additional manufacturing jobs in the economy by 2022.
    • Third-increase manufacturing’s contribution to GDP to 25%: The third objective is to ensure that the manufacturing sector’s contribution to GDP is increased to 25% by 2022 (revised to 2025) from the current 16%.

    Assessment of the progress made so far

    • As the policy changes were intended to usher growth in three key variables of the manufacturing sector — investments, output, and employment growth.
    • Progress on the investment front:
      • Slow growth: The last five years witnessed slow growth of investment in the economy.
      • This is more so when we consider capital investments in the manufacturing sector.
      • The decline in gross fixed capital formation: Gross fixed capital formation of the private sector declined to 28.6% of GDP in 2017-18 from 31.3% in 2013-14 (Economic Survey 2018-19).
      • Gross Fixed Capital Formation is the measure of aggregate investment.
      • Increase in private sector’s savings decrease in investment: Household savings have declined, while the private corporate sector’s savings have increased.
      • This is a scenario where the private sector’s savings have increased, but investments have decreased, despite policy measures to provide a good investment climate.
    • Progress on the output growth front:
      • Double-digit growth only in two quarters: The monthly index of industrial production (IIP) pertaining to manufacturing has registered double-digit growth rates only on two occasions during the period April 2012 to November 2019.
      • Below 3% for the most part: The data show that for a majority of the months, it was 3% or below and even negative for some months.
      • The negative growth implies a contraction of the sector.
    • Progress on the employment growth front:
      • No progress: The employment, especially industrial employment, has not grown to keep pace with the rate of new entries into the labour market.

    Problems with the policy

    • The initiative had two major lacunae.
    • First- Too much reliance on foreign capital: The bulk of these schemes relied too much on foreign capital for investments and global markets for produce.
      • This created an inbuilt uncertainty, as domestic production had to be planned according to the demand and supply conditions elsewhere.
    • Second-Lack of implementation: The policy implementers need to take into account the implications of implementation deficit in their decisions.
      • The result of such a policy oversight is evident in a large number of stalled projects in India.
      • The spate of policy announcements without having the preparedness to implement them is ‘policy casualness’.
      • ‘Make in India’ has been plagued by a large number of under-prepared initiatives.

    Three reasons why ‘Make in India’ failed to perform

    • Too-much ambitious goals: It set out too ambitious growth rates for the manufacturing sector to achieve.
      • Beyond capacity rate for the sector: An annual growth rate of 12-14% is well beyond the capacity of the industrial sector.
      • Overestimation of implementation capacity: To expect to build capabilities for such a quantum jump is perhaps an enormous overestimation of the implementation capacity of the government.
    • Dealing with too many sectors: The initiative brought in too many sectors into its fold.
      • Lack of policy focus: Bringing in too many sectors under its fold led to a loss of policy focus.
      • Lack of understanding of comparative advantages: Further, it was seen as a policy devoid of any understanding of the comparative advantages of the domestic economy.
    • Ill-timed launch
      • Given the uncertainties of the global economy and ever-rising trade protectionism, the initiative was spectacularly ill-timed.

    Conclusion

    • In order to revive the ‘Make in India’ there is a need to make necessary changes in the policy and root out the causes associated with the policy implementation.

     

     

     

     

     

     

  • [op-ed snap] A farm wish list for the budget

    Context

    As finance minister presents the budget the FM need to ensure transparency and to fully account for the food subsidy.

    The excess buffer stock and need to reform

    • A buffer stock norm and actual stock: A buffer stock norm is at 21.4 million tonnes (mt).
      • Actual stock far exceeds the norm: The actual stocks of grains with the central pool stood at 75.5 mt.
      • Which is 3.5 times what the government needs to hold.
    • The economic cost of the excess stock: At its economic cost, the value of the excess stocks with the government stands at Rs 1.6 lakh crore.
      • Potential for revenue: There is no better place to find revenue for the FM than to liquidate these stocks.
      • Need for the reform in grain management system: Unless the grain management system is reformed, the inefficiency of the grain management system will keep on increasing and the nation will suffer.

    Food subsidy reforms

    • Link food prices to procurement price: It is the time to revise the central issue of price and link it to the procurement price-say at half the procurement price.
      • Limit the population coverage: There is a need to limit this highly subsidised food of Rs 3/kg for rice and Rs 2/kg of wheat to say 40 per cent of the population.
      • Move to DBT: The real fundamental reform would be to move towards direct cash transfers for the intended beneficiaries of food subsidy.

    Fertiliser subsidy reforms

    • Imbalance in the subsidisation: The real problem of this sector is the imbalance in the policy of fertiliser subsidisation.
      • While urea (N) is subsidised to the extent of 75 per cent of its cost, phosphatic (P) and potassic (K) fertilisers are subsidised only to the tune of about 25 per cent of their cost.
    • Consequences of this imbalance: The result is the highly imbalanced use of N, P and K on farmers’ fields. Which results in
      • Giving a very low fertiliser-to-grain response ratio.
      • Degrading the soil.
      • Degrading underground water.
      • Degrading the environment with excessive nitrogen use.
      • Discouragement to natural farming: The current fertiliser subsidy discourages those who want to pursue natural farming as they don’t get subsidy anywhere near the amount chemical-based fertilisers do.
    • Reforms: There are two ways in which the fertiliser subsidy regime can be reformed.
      • Bring nitrogenous fertiliser under NBS: The solution to the imbalance in use is to bring nitrogenous fertilisers under the Nutrient Based Subsidy (NBS) scheme.
      • Cash transfer based on per hectare basis: The second option is to move towards direct cash transfers for fertilisers on a per hectare basis, with some adjustment for irrigated tracts.
      • 50,000 Crore saving: The above-mentioned reforms could result in the saving of Rs. 50,000 crores to the public exchequer.

    Way forward

    • Investing the savings where it matters the most: The savings from the reforms could be invested in-
      • Better water management, especially drip irrigation.
      • Infrastructure for agri-markets.
      • Solar trees: The investments could also be made in setting up the solar trees in the farm to harvest solar power on farmer’s fields with buyback agreements for surplus production.

  • Natural Gas Grid (NGG)

    A study to facilitate the development of a National Gas Grid is to be undertaken soon by a U.S. entity. The Government has last year envisaged developing the NGG.

    National Gas Grid

    • At present about 16,788 Km natural gas pipeline is operational and about 14,239 Km gas pipelines are being developed to increase the availability of natural gas across the country.
    • These pipelines have been authorized by Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board (PNGRB) and are at various stages of execution viz. Pre-Project activities/laying/testing/commissioning etc.

    Aims and Objective

    • To remove regional imbalance within the country with regard to access of natural gas and provide clean and green fuel throughout the country.
    • To connect gas sources to major demand centres and ensure availability of gas to consumers in various sectors.
    • Development of City Gas Distribution Networks in various cities for supply of CNG and PNG.

    NGG Technical Assistance Program

    • The India NGG Technical Assistance programme stems from an agreement in September between PNGRB and the US Trade Development Agency (USTDA).
    • The study will aim at developing an economic basis for building India’s Natural Gas Grid (NGG).

    Utility of the study

    • It would provide an update on the gas demand analysis, including anchor consumers, industries, city gas distribution (CGD) and emerging demand centres such as CNG and LNG for road transport.
    • The study will take a fresh look at the gas supply analysis too. This includes review of LNG imports, domestic supply, potential transnational gas pipeline imports and virtual pipelines.
    • Share of natural gas in India’s energy basket is 6.2% as against 23.4% globally and is expected to increase.

  • [op-ed of the day] Business possibilities in a world of digital payments

    Context

    UPI has brought digital payments to the common man and it has immense scope for growth.

    Zero MDR rate

    • Recently the finance minister made the announcement of the zero merchant discount rate (MDR) policy for payments through RuPay debit cards and Unified Payments Interface (UPI) instruments.
    • What does it mean? This policy dictates that when a consumer pays a merchant using RuPay or UPI, the bank may not charge the merchant a commission on the sale value that it usually charges a merchant.
    • Criticism of the move: Critics of this policy lament that it would begin to reverse the progress India has made in recent years to expand the digital payments network.

    Some facts and figures

    • Setting up of NPCI: In 2008 the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) was set up as an umbrella organization for operating retail payments and settlements in India. 
    • UPI:  In 2016, NPCI introduced UPI.
      • UPI has since registered 100 million users.
      • UPI now clocks more than 1 billion transactions every month.
    • Growth prospects for mobile payments: According to the NITI Aayog, mobile payments in India are expected to grow nearly 20-fold to $190 billion in the next three years.
    • Digital payment for the common man: There are 1 billion mobile phone users in India.
    • 420 million users have a feature phone, these users can use the *99# USSD service to dial into 13 different languages.
    • Which would connect them to UPI and brings digital payments to the common man.

    Need for innovation

    • We are far behind: India is far behind china, where 55% of spending is done digitally, compared to only 11% in India.
      • The outlook for future growth is mind-boggling.
      • There is a need for innovation at three levels.
    • First level-Adoption
      • A better understanding of human behaviour, technology, use cases and dis-use cases will facilitate the 10x growth necessary in adoption rates to cover the entire population.
    • Second level-Policy
      • The government has the rare opportunity to develop a data-centric understanding of how the economy conducts itself and uses money, and can set taxes accordingly.
    • Third level-Technology
      • Voice for authentication: At the technology level, there is an opportunity to use voice as a means for authentication and conduct transactions across multiple local languages.
      • Data analysis: Copious amounts of data from payment transactions can be analysed to understand user needs and develop personalized loans and financial solutions at scale.

    Taking UPI to Global Level

    • UPI in Singapore and UAE: The NCPI is gearing up to take UPI to other countries, beginning with Singapore and the United Arab Emirates.
      • NCPI is working with its counterpart in Singapore, the Network for Electronic Transfers for Singapore, to bring UPI live in Singapore.
    • The low hanging fruit is to provide payment solutions to Indians travelling abroad.
    • Competition with global peers: The bigger and tougher game is to increase its usage among local people in countries outside India.
      • This would put UPI in competition with the likes of PayPal and Skrill.

    Conclusion

    We have seen just the tip, albeit a very substantial tip, of the digital payments iceberg. In the coming years, young business leaders of today must learn to uncover the iceberg itself.

     

     

     

     

  • [op-ed snap] When the FRDI Bill Returns

    Context

    The amendments to the FRDI Bill, 2017—now renamed the Financial Sector Development and Regulation (Resolution) Bill, 2019—are being worked out.

    Three crucial issues

    • Specifics are being worked out in the bill on three crucial issues.
      • First issue: The first issue is regarding the increase in the deposit insurance cover of customers.
      • Second issue: To iron out the contentious issues related to the bail-in clause
      • Third issue: To decide whether this resolution framework should apply to the public sector banks.
    • Advantages of the move: At a time when the public sector banks have come under the stress of bad loans, increasing the deposit insurance coverage limit would be a welcome approach.
      • Increasing the depositor’s confidence: The move will reinforce depositors’ confidence in the banking system in general, and the public sector banks in particular.

    The issue of the government “ownership” of the banks and financial stability

    • Ownership of government: The role of the “ownership” of banks towards financial stability is a much-debated issue in the country.
      • RBI is positive about govt. ownership: The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has attributed a positive role to the government ownership of banks in attaining financial stability.
      • The issue of competitive neutrality: Committee to Draft Code on the Resolution of Financial Firms has blamed govt. ownership for causing a “lack of competitive neutrality” in the financial sector.
      • Need of level playing field: Committee argued for the need of a “level playing field” for both the public and private sector financial firms for the sake of competitive neutrality.
      • The concept of an overarching resolution framework for all financial firms gained traction.

    Would the all-encompassing Resolution Corporation be efficacious?

    • The FRDI Bill, 2017 sought to amend as many as 20 legislations for the diverse financial sector in this country, which is regulated by various institutions, like-
      • RBI for the banks and the non-banking financial corporations.
      • Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) for the insurance markets,
      • Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) for securities markets and mutual funds.
      • The Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority for pension funds.
    • The pertinent question
      • The pertinent question is whether an all-encompassing resolution corporation can be really efficacious for the much-discussed financial stability of this country.

     

    Fundamental issues

    • Neutrality of ownership
      • Different motives behind operations: While private financial institutions are predominantly governed by profit motives, for the public sector agencies, various social obligations, such as “financial inclusion,” assume primacy.
      • Reason for commoner’s confidence: It is the sense of the government’s involvement (or ownership) that has forged commoners’ confidence to park their financial savings with them.
      • The move may end up destabilising the financial sector: If the sovereign guarantee and resolving power are taken away from the government domain to some resolution corporation, it may destabilise the financial system.
    • The Bail-in clause
      • Deposit over 1 lakh included in bail-in mechanism: The FRDI Bill 2017 suggests that deposit amounts over and above the cover limit (which currently is at one lakh) will be included in the bail-in mechanism.
      • Further, despite the RBI’s caution against financial instability, short-term debts and uncategorised client assets are also currently under this mechanism.
      • The falling growth rate of deposits: These provisions and the bill per se came against the backdrop of the Financial Stability Report, 2017 that revealed a 3.3% drop in the year-on-year growth rate of deposits for all scheduled banks in the country.

    Conclusion

    In the context of decelerating financial stability, the government needs to undertake these resolution reforms with caution that the reforms do not end-up eroding depositors’ faith in the domestic financial institutions.

     

    .

     

     

  • National E-Mobility Mission Plan 2020

     

    The Supreme Court has sought the response of the government on a petition that alleges the non-implementation of the National E-Mobility Mission Plan, 2020 (NEMMP), which came out in 2012.

    National Electric Mobility Mission Plan (NEMMP) 2020

    • The plan was launched by the Government of India in 2013 with the objective of achieving national fuel security by promoting electric and hybrid vehicles.
    • It had set a target of achieving a sale of seven million EVs by 2020 and thereby aimed to cut total carbon dioxide emissions by three per cent from the ‘do nothing’ scenario.
    • The government would provide fiscal and monetary incentives for this industry.
    • The plan had made several recommendations for the adoption of electric vehicles (EVs), including electric-powered government fleets and public transportation and subsidies for those who opt for EVs.

    What was the petition about?

    • The petition contended that the governmental apathy has violated the fundamental rights of citizens to health and clean environment guaranteed under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.
    • The government had failed in its obligation to mitigate the impact of climate change and air pollution partly attributable to emissions from vehicles that burn fossil fuels.
    • Government’s failure to suitably implement these recommendations is the direct cause of air pollution levels that have turned our cities into virtual ‘gas chambers’.

  • [pib] APNA UREA – SonaUgle

     

    APNA UREA – SonaUgle

    • The Union Minister for Chemicals and Fertilizers launched the “APNA UREA – SonaUgle” brand of Hindustan Urvarak & Rasayan Limited (HURL).
    • HURL is Joint Venture Company promoted by the three Maharatna Companies i.e. Coal India Limited (CIL), NTPC Limited (NTPC) and Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL) as the lead promoters with FCIL and HFCL as other two partners.
    • The commissioning of the HURL’s three Units in the states of UP, Bihar and Jharkhand will open forward and backward linkages for business activity in the Eastern part of India.
    • It will be instrumental in opening new avenues for the generation of income and employment in the Eastern part of our country.

  • Telecommunication Consumers Education and Protection Fund (TCEPF)

    The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) has informed that telecom service providers will need to deposit all unclaimed money of consumers, including excess charges and security deposit, in the Telecommunication Consumers Education and Protection Fund (TCEPF).

    Telecommunication Consumers Education and Protection Fund (TCEPF)

    • The TCEPF Regulations, 2007 have been amended to provide the basic framework for depositing unclaimed money of consumers by service providers, maintenance of the TCEPF and other related aspects.
    • Any unclaimed / unrefundable amount belonging to consumers in the TCEP fund will be utilized for the welfare measures of the consumers.
    • With this amendment, service providers will deposit any unclaimed consumer money of any form such as excess charges, security deposit, plan charges of failed activations, or any amount belonging to a consumer, which service providers are unable to refund to consumers.

    Why such move?

    • The TRAI observed that there is a need to bring clarity among service providers in depositing money which they are unable to refund to the consumers.
    • While some service providers were depositing money only on account of excess billing revealed in the audit, others were depositing unclaimed money such as security deposits and plan charges of failed activations.