💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF

Subject: Environment

  • India’s Lion Population rises to 891

    Why in the News?

    In 2025, India reported a 32.2% rise in its Asiatic lion population, from 674 in 2020 to 891 in 2025, as per the 16th Lion Population Estimation.

    World Lion Day is observed annually on August 10 to promote awareness and action for the conservation of lions worldwide.

    About Asiatic Lion:

    • Scientific Name: Panthera leo leo — subspecies found only in India.
    • Historical Range: Once across West Asia & Middle East; now extinct outside India.
    • Physical Trait: Slightly smaller than African lions; has a unique belly fold.
    • Current Range: Gir National Park & surrounding Saurashtra areas, Gujarat.
    • Past Range in India: Extended to West Bengal and central India (Rewa, Madhya Pradesh).
    • Conservation Status:
      • IUCN –Vulnerable
      • CITES – Appendix I
      • Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 – Schedule I

    2025 Census Highlights:

    • Population: 891 lions (+32.2% from 2020).
    • Decadal Growth: +70.36% since 2015 (from 523 lions).
    • Adult Females: 330 (+26.9% from 2020).
    • Satellite Populations: 497 lions in 9 locations — new groups in Barda WLS, Jetpur, Babra-Jasdan.
    • Corridor Records: 22 lions sighted for the first time.
    • Regional Growth: Mitiyala WLS (+100%), Bhavnagar Mainland (+84%), South Eastern Coast (+40%).
    • Declines: Girnar WLS (-4%), Bhavnagar Coast (-12%).
    [UPSC 2019] Consider the following statements:

    1. Asiatic lion is naturally found In India only.

    2. Double-humped camel is naturally found in India only.

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    Options: (a) 1 only *  (b) 2 only (c) 1 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3

     

  • Fifth Session of Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC)

    Why in the News?

    The second part of the fifth session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC-5.2) on plastic pollution has opened in Geneva, Switzerland.

    About Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC):

    • Formation: Created by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) in March 2022 to develop a global treaty on plastic pollution.
    • Nature: UN-mandated body with equal participation of all member states.
    • Output: Produces consensus-based treaties, sometimes including voluntary provisions.
    • Precedents: Similar to the Convention on Biological Diversity (1992) and UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (1992).
    • Mandate: By 2024, draft a legally binding treaty covering plastic’s full life cycle—production, design, use, and disposal.

    Negotiation Process & Timeline:

    • Method: Plenary sessions, technical groups, and stakeholder consultations.
    • Sessions:
      1. Uruguay (Nov–Dec 2022)
      2. France (May–June 2023)
      3. Kenya (Nov 2023)
      4. Canada (Apr–May 2024)
      5. South Korea (Nov–Dec 2024, final session)
    • Key Debates: Scope, binding vs. voluntary rules, financing, compliance, and differentiated responsibilities.
    • Outcome: Treaty text refined until consensus or majority approval.

    Goals on Plastic Pollution:

    • Standards: Global production and waste management norms.
    • Targets: Combination of binding goals and voluntary approaches.
    • Financing: Creation of funding mechanisms for treaty implementation.
    • Sustainability: Promotion of circular economy and efficient resource use.
    • Participation: Inclusion of governments, industry, civil society, Indigenous groups, and waste pickers.
    [UPSC 2021] The ‘Common Carbon Metric,’ supported by UNEP, has been developed for:

    (a) Assessing the carbon footprint of building operations around the world* (b) Enabling commercial farming entities around the world to enter carbon emission trading (c) Enabling governments to assess the overall carbon footprint caused by their countries (d) Assessing the overall carbon footprint caused by the use of fossil fuels by the world in a unit time

     

  • How groundwater contamination is fuelling chronic illnesses

    India’s groundwater is increasingly getting contaminated with toxic substances. Over 85% of rural drinking water and 65% of irrigation needs are met through groundwater, yet unregulated extraction, industrial waste, agricultural runoff, and poor sanitation have turned this life source into a silent killer.

    Scale of the Crisis

    The 2024 Annual Groundwater Quality Report by the Central Ground Water Board (CGWB) reported the following:

    1. Nitrates: Found in 20%+ samples (due to chemical fertilisers & septic tank leakage).
    2. Fluoride: Detected in 9%+ samples, leading to skeletal & dental fluorosis.
    3. Arsenic: Found in parts of Punjab, Bihar, Uttar Pradesh causing cancers & neurological damage.
    4. Uranium: Detected in Punjab, Andhra Pradesh, Rajasthan linked to kidney damage.
    5. Heavy metals: Iron, lead, cadmium, chromium, causing developmental & immune system issues.

    Major Contaminants and Health Impacts

    • Fluoride Contamination: 
      1. Affects 230 districts across 20 states.
      2. Health impact: Skeletal fluorosis, stunted growth, joint pain.
      3. Rajasthan, MP, and UP report high prevalence.
      4. Example: Jhabua (MP) – 40% of tribal children affected
    • Arsenic Exposure:
      1. Concentrated in Gangetic belt.
      2. Health impact: Skin lesions, respiratory illness, cancers (skin, liver, kidney, bladder).
      3. Example: Ballia (UP) – Arsenic 200 g/L (20× WHO limit) linked to 10,000+ cancer cases.
    • Nitrate Pollution: 
      1. 56% districts exceed safe limits.
      2. Health impact: Blue Baby Syndrome in infants, gastrointestinal distress.
      3. Driven by fertilisers & poor waste management.
    • Uranium Contamination:
      1. Increasing due to over-extraction & phosphate fertilisers.
      2. Health impact: Nephrotoxicity, chronic organ damage.
      3. Example: Malwa (Punjab) – 66% samples risky for children.
    • Heavy Metal Pollution: 
      1. Sources: Industrial discharge, mining.
      2. Health impact: Neurological issues, anaemia, developmental delays.

    Groundwater Death Zones: Case Studies

    1. Budhpur, Baghpat (UP) – 13 deaths in 2 weeks from kidney failure linked to industrial waste.
    2. Jalaun (UP) – Petroleum-like fluids from hand pumps due to underground fuel leaks.
    3. Paikarapur (Bhubaneswar) – Sewage leakage caused illness in hundreds.

    Why the Crisis Persists: Root Causes and Systemic Failures:

    1. Institutional Fragmentation: Various agencies like the CGWB, the CPCB, the SPCBs, and the Ministry of Jal Shakti operate in silos, leading to a lack of a unified, coordinated approach.
    2. Weak Legal Enforcement: The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, has inadequate provisions for groundwater. This, combined with lax enforcement and regulatory loopholes, emboldens polluters.
    3. Lack of Real-Time Data: Monitoring is infrequent and poorly disseminated. Without early warning systems, contamination is often discovered only after serious health consequences have emerged.
    4. Excessive Groundwater Extraction: Over-pumping lowers water tables and concentrates pollutants, making aquifers more vulnerable to both geogenic toxins and industrial contaminants.
    5. Deficient Waste Management: Inadequate industrial effluent treatment and poor sanitation infrastructure, especially in rural areas, allow pollutants to seep directly into aquifers

    The Way Forward: A Multi-Dimensional Strategy

    Addressing this crisis requires a bold, multi-dimensional strategy that integrates regulation, technology, health, and public participation.

    1. National Framework: Enact a comprehensive National Groundwater Pollution Control Framework with clear legal authority to regulate groundwater use and discharge.
    2. Modern Monitoring Infrastructure: Deploy real-time monitoring systems using sensors and public dashboards to create an early warning network.
    3. Targeted Remediation: Implement targeted interventions for specific contaminants, such as defluoridation plants in high-fluoride zones and arsenic removal technologies in affected regions.
    4. Waste Management Reforms: Enforce strict industrial effluent treatment norms and promote sustainable agricultural practices to reduce the use of chemical fertilizers.
    5. Citizen-Centric Governance: Empower local communities through Jal Gram Sabhas to manage local water resources, conduct community water testing, and raise public awareness.

    Value Addition: Key Concepts:

    • Geogenic Contamination: Naturally occurring pollutants like arsenic and fluoride mobilized by human activity.
    • Anthropogenic Contamination: Human-induced pollution from industries, agriculture, and urban waste.
    • Skeletal Fluorosis: A debilitating condition causing bone deformities.
    • Methemoglobinemia (“Blue Baby Syndrome”): A potentially fatal condition in infants caused by nitrate-laced water.

    Practice UPSC MAINS question:

    “Groundwater pollution in India is no longer about scarcity—it is about safety and survival.” Discuss this statement with recent examples and suggest a multi-pronged approach to tackle this issue.

     

  • District Flood Severity Index (DFSI)

    Why in the News?

    Researchers from IIT Delhi and IIT Gandhinagar have developed a District Flood Severity Index (DFSI) to aid flood planning using past data and human impact indicators.

    About the District Flood Severity Index (DFSI):

    • Objective: To provide a comprehensive, data-based assessment of flood severity across Indian districts.
    • Focus: District-level analysis, as districts are the core units for planning and implementation of disaster management in India.
    • Based on long-term data (since 1967): Collected annually by the India Meteorological Department (IMD) on major flood events.
    • Significance: Responds to the lack of an official national index that incorporates human impact, not just flood magnitude.

    Key Parameters Used in DFSI:

    The index incorporates multiple indicators to measure both the scale and impact of flooding:

    1. Mean duration (in days) of flood events per district.
    2. Percentage of district area historically affected by floods.
    3. Total deaths and injuries due to floods.
    4. Population of the district — used to assess per capita impact.
    5. 40-year curated dataset developed at IIT Delhi used for historical flood mapping.

    Key Insights from the Index:

    • Thiruvananthapuram (Kerala): Recorded the highest number of flood events (231), but does not feature in the top 30 most severely impacted districts as per DFSI.
    • Patna (Bihar): Ranked #1 on the severity index due to higher population impact and flood spread.
    • Assam districts like Dhemaji, Kamrup, and Nagaon consistently face high flood frequency (178+ events), but ranking depends on combined indicators.

     

    [UPSC 2014] What are the benefits of implementing the ‘Integrated Watershed Development Programme’?”

    1. Prevention of soil runoff 2. Linking the country’s perennial rivers with seasonal rivers

    3. Rainwater harvesting and recharge of groundwater table 4. Regeneration of natural vegetation

    Options: (a) 1 and 2 only (b) 2, 3 and 4 only (c) 1, 3 and 4 only* (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4 only

     

  • Specie in news: Indian flapshell turtle (Lissemys punctata)

    Why in the News?

    The Social Forestry Department of Vadodara rescued an Albino Indian flapshell turtle (Lissemys punctata) from a freshwater lake in Chikhodra, Gujarat.

    Specie in news: Indian flapshell turtle (Lissemys punctata)

    About Indian Flapshell Turtle (Lissemys punctata):

    • Type: Small, freshwater softshell turtle native to South Asia
    • Unique Feature: Named for femoral flaps on the plastron that cover the limbs when retracted
    • Geographic Range: Found in India, Pakistan, Nepal, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Myanmar
    • River Systems: Occurs in the Indus, Ganges, Irrawaddy, and Salween basins
    • Habitat: Prefers shallow, quiet freshwater bodies like rivers, ponds, lakes, marshes, tanks, and canals with muddy or sandy bottoms for burrowing
    • Conservation Status:
      • IUCN Red List: Vulnerable
      • CITES Listing: Appendix II
      • Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972: Schedule I (maximum protection)
    • Major Threats:
      • Poaching for meat, blood-based potions, aphrodisiacs, and traditional medicine
      • Illegal trade for fishing bait, livestock feed, leather, and exotic pets
      • Habitat loss due to pollution, encroachment, and waterbody destruction
      • Albino individuals especially targeted in the illegal pet market
    [UPSC 2013] Consider the following fauna of India:

    1. Gharial 2. Leatherback turtle 3. Swamp deer

    Which of the above is/are endangered?

    Options: (a) 1 and 2 only (b) 3 only (c) 1, 2 and 3* (d) None

     

  • What is the potential of Biochar?

    As India gears up to launch its carbon market in 2026, biochar, a carbon-rich material made from agricultural and organic waste, is gaining attention as a sustainable solution for carbon capture and waste management. Despite its immense potential, biochar remains underutilised due to lack of policy support, market structures and awareness.

    What is the potential of biochar?

    What is Biochar and Why is it Important?

    • Biochar is a type of charcoal/black carbon produced by heating organic waste (like crop residue or solid municipal waste) in a low-oxygen environment.
    • It locks carbon into the soil for hundreds of years, reducing greenhouse gases and improving soil quality.
    • It is an effective long-term carbon sink.

    Biochar Potential in India:

    • India generates over 600 million tonnes of agricultural waste and 60 million tonnes of municipal waste each year, much of which is burned or dumped, contributing to pollution.
    • By converting just 30–50% of this waste into biochar, India could:
      • Produce 15–26 million tonnes of biochar
      • Remove 0.1 gigatonnes of Carbon Dioxide (CO₂) equivalent emissions annually
    • Biochar production also provides with the following:
      • Syngas (20–30 million tonnes) which can generate 8–13 TWh of electricity, replacing about 0.5–0.7 million tonnes of coal
      • Bio-oil (24–40 million tonnes) which can offset 12–19 million tonnes of diesel/kerosene, reducing oil imports and fossil fuel emissions by more than 2%

    Applications of Biochar in Key Sectors:

    1. Agriculture: It improves soil health and water retention, especially in semi-arid and nutrient-poor regions. It can reduce nitrous oxide emissions by 30–50%, which is vital as this gas has 273x more warming potential than CO₂. Its application leads to higher crop yields (10–25%) and reduced fertilizer needs (by 10–20%). Biochar can also enhance soil organic carbon, helping restore degraded soils.
    2. Construction: Adding just 2–5% biochar in concrete improves strength and heat resistance. It helps capture 115 kg of CO₂ per cubic metre of concrete, turning buildings into carbon sinks.
    3. Wastewater Treatment: One kg of biochar can help treat 200–500 litres of wastewater. India’s untreated wastewater (~72%) could use 2.5–6.3 million tonnes of biochar annually.
    4. Carbon Capture: Biochar can be modified to absorb CO₂ from industrial exhausts, though current efficiency is lower than traditional methods.
    5. Circular Economy: Biochar aligns with the circular economy model, waste to wealth.

    Why is Biochar Still Not Widely Adopted?

    1. It remains underrepresented in carbon credit systems due to the absence of standardised feedstock markets and consistent carbon accounting methods, which undermine investor confidence.
    2. Limited policy support, low public awareness, and no coordinated action across sectors.
    3. No strong carbon credit mechanism to reward users and producers.

    Steps that can be undertaken for Large-Scale Adoption of Biochar:

    1. R&D Support: Develop region-specific feedstock guidelines and technologies.
    2. Policy Integration: Link biochar with Crop residue management schemes, Bioenergy programs and State Action Plans on Climate Change
    3. Carbon Market Recognition: Allow biochar to earn carbon credits, giving financial incentives to farmers and investors.
    4. Village-Level Deployment: Establish small-scale biochar units that can create over 5 lakh rural jobs.
    5. Linkage with National Missions: Can be linked with Mission LiFE and the Swachh Bharat Abhiyan.

    Biochar offers a powerful tool for India’s climate smart and sustainable agriculture by enhancing soil health, improving water and nutrient retention, and bolstering climate resilience. Its integration can reduce dependency on synthetic inputs, aligning with organic farming principles. Crucially, biochar provides a significant mechanism for carbon sequestration and mitigating greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture, contributing to India’s climate goals. Leveraging this “black gold” through targeted policy support and research is essential for a greener, more resilient future.

    Practice UPSC Mains Question

    1. Biochar is emerging as a multipurpose tool for sustainable development in India. Discuss its potential across sectors and the challenges in its adoption.
    2. What are the salient features of ‘Waste-to-Energy’ policy of India? Describe the role of waste to energy technologies in achieving energy security in India.
  • Microplastic and marine debris levels

    Microplastic Pollution:

    Microplastics are now a serious environmental and health threat. A recent (Ministry of Earth Sciences) MoES–NCCR survey found alarming levels along India’s east and west coasts, highlighting the urgent need to embed microplastic control within India’s environmental governance framework.

    Key Findings from NCCR Survey (2022–2025):

    1. Major microplastic sources identified:
      1. Riverine inputs (plastic waste transported by rivers)
      2. Abandoned, Lost, and Discarded Fishing Gear (ALDFG), a persistent marine debris source globally
    2. The presence of primary (e.g., microbeads in cosmetics) and secondary microplastics (from the breakdown of plastic waste) was confirmed.

    Microplastics: Nature

    • Definition: Plastic particles ranging between 1 micrometre (µm) and 5 millimetres (mm).
    • Types:
      • Primary Microplastics: Manufactured in small sizes (e.g., microbeads in personal care products).
      • Secondary Microplastics: Result from degradation of larger plastic items due to sunlight, wave action and other environmental factors.

    Environmental Impact of Microplastics:

    Impact on Marine Environments:

    1. Ingestion by Marine Life: Marine organisms, including fish, seabirds, ingest microplastics and can cause physical harm including gut blockages and tissue damage.
    2. Bioaccumulation in Marine Food Webs: Bioaccumulation can lead to higher concentrations of toxins such as Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in top predators, potentially impacting their health and reproductive success.
    3. Habitat Disruption: Microplastics can accumulate in marine sediments and affect the structure and function of marine ecosystems.
    4. Chemical Leaching: Microplastics can leach harmful chemicals into the surrounding seawater. These chemicals include Bisphenol A (BPA), which is known to cause reproductive defects in some fish species, along with phthalates and brominated flame retardants, all of which can interfere with the endocrine system.

    Impact on Ecological Systems:

    1. Soil Contamination: Microplastics can negatively impact soil structure, microbial activity, and nutrient cycling, affecting plant growth and overall ecosystem health. They can act as carriers for toxins like heavy metals (e.g., Lead (Pb) and Cadmium (Cd)).
    2. Disruption of Food Webs: Microplastics can accumulate in the bodies of various organisms, potentially disrupting food chains and affecting higher trophic levels.
    3. Impact on Soil Biota: Exposure to microplastics can negatively impact soil-dwelling organisms like earthworms and microorganisms, affecting their growth and reproduction. Leaching of plastic additives such as phthalates can disrupt cell membrane function in microbes.
    4. Plant Toxicity: Microplastics can be absorbed by plants, potentially affecting their growth and development, and introducing toxins into the food chain.

    India’s Initiatives on Microplastic Management

    1. Plastic Waste Management Rules, 2016 (Amended 2021–22): Ban on single-use plastics and Emphasis on Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) for collection and recycling.
    2. Swachh Bharat Mission 2.0: Includes solid waste segregation, treatment, and scientific disposal.
    3. Ecosensitive Coastal Zone Regulation (CRZ): CRZ rules govern development along coastlines and indirectly reduce marine plastic input.
    4. FSSAI Project: Ongoing study to develop standard detection protocols for microplastics in food products.

    International Conventions and Agreements

    • MARPOL (International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships) Annex V prohibits the discharge of plastics and synthetic fishing gear into the sea.
    • Basel Convention (1989, amended in 2019) regulates transboundary movement of plastic waste. India ratified the amendments concerning plastic waste in 2020.
    • The United Nations Environment Assembly (UNEA) adopted a historic resolution to negotiate a legally binding global treaty on plastic pollution by 2024 (still ongoing).
    • Sustainable Development Goal 14 talks about Preventing and significantly reducing marine pollution of all kinds, particularly from land-based activities.
    • Global Partnership on Marine Litter (GPML): A UN Environment initiative, India is a participating country.

    Way Forward

    1. National Microplastic Monitoring Programme: Expand surveys to include rivers, lakes, groundwater, and terrestrial ecosystems.
    2. Ban on Microbeads: A clear legislative ban on the use of microbeads in personal care products (done in countries like the UK and USA).
    3. Fishing Gear Recovery Programmes: Introduce buy-back schemes or incentives for collection of damaged fishing gear.
    4. Invest in R&D: Support startups and research institutes working on biodegradable alternatives and plastic detection methods.
    5. Public Awareness and Behavioural Change: Use platforms like Eco Clubs, MyGov, Swachh Bharat campaigns for mass education.

    The presence of microplastics disrupts ecosystems by affecting organisms’ behavior and physiology, impacting soil fertility, and altering aquatic food webs. Addressing microplastic pollution requires a multi-faceted approach, including reducing plastic consumption, improving waste management, and developing innovative solutions like biodegradable alternatives and advanced filtration systems.

    Practice UPSC Mains Questions:

    1. What are microplastics and how do they impact human health and the environment? Evaluate India’s current policy response to the problem and suggest a comprehensive mitigation strategy.
    2. Critically discuss the effectiveness of current national and global efforts to combat microplastic pollution, including initiatives like the Single-Use Plastic ban and the ongoing discussions around a legally binding international plastics treaty.
  • In News: Great Barrier Reef

    Why in the News?

    The Great Barrier Reef is facing its sharpest coral decline in 40 years, with the 2024 mass bleaching—driven by climate change, cyclones, and coral predators—severely damaging large reef areas.

    In News: Great Barrier Reef

    About Great Barrier Reef:

    • Location: Coral Sea, off the northeast coast of Queensland, Australia.
    • Length & Area: Extends ~2,300 km; comprises ~3,000 reefs and 900 islands, covering ~350,000 square kilometers (about 10% of global coral reef ecosystems).
    • Biodiversity:
      • Hosts 400 coral species, 1,500 fish species, and 4,000 mollusk species.
      • Habitat for endangered species like the dugong and green turtle.
    • Reef Types: Includes platform reefs, wall reefs, and fringing reefs.
    • Protection Status:
      • Managed by the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority.
      • Declared a United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) World Heritage Site in 1981.
    • Mass Bleaching Years: Notable events occurred in 1998, 2002, 2016, 2017, 2020, 2022, 2024, and 2025.

    Coral Decline and Bleaching Events:

    • Main Cause: Heat stress due to climate change, particularly during marine heatwaves.
    • 2024 Event: Fifth major bleaching since 2016; had the widest spatial impact recorded in the Australian Institute of Marine Science’s 39-year monitoring program.
    • Additional Damage: Cyclones (e.g., Cyclone Jasper) and flood plumes caused physical damage and freshwater stress.
    • Biological Threats: Crown-of-thorns starfish (COTS) outbreaks intensified coral predation, especially in the Swains sector.
    • 2025 Survey Findings:
      • 48% of 124 surveyed reefs showed coral decline.
      • Only 10% recorded an increase in coral cover.
    • Regional Impact: Southern Great Barrier Reef saw a 30.6% drop in hard coral cover—the sharpest annual decline ever recorded in that zone.
    [UPSC 2014] The scientific view is that the increase in global temperature should not exceed 2 0 C above pre-industrial level. If the global temperature increases beyond 30 C above the pre-industrial level, what can be its possible impact/impacts on the world?

    1. Terrestrial biosphere tends toward a net carbon source. 2. Widespread coral mortality will occur. 3. All the global wetlands will permanently disappear.  4. Cultivation of cereals will not be possible anywhere in the world. Select the correct answer using the code given below:

    Options: (a) 1 only (b) 1 and 2 only* (c) 2, 3 and 4 only (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4 only

     

  • Status of Ethanol Blended Petrol (EBP) Programme

    Why in the News?

    India met its 20% ethanol blending (E20) target in petrol by March 2025 — five years early. Talks are now on to raise the blending ratio further in the immediate future.

    About Ethanol Blended Petrol (EBP) Programme:

    • Launched in 2003 by the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas.
    • Objective: Promote use of renewable, domestically produced ethanol in petrol.
    • Nationwide rollout (except A&N and Lakshadweep) since April 2019.
    • Feedstock:
      • 1G Ethanol: From sugarcane molasses, maize, rice.
      • 2G Ethanol: From agricultural residues like rice straw, bamboo, bagasse.
    • Blending Progress:
      • 1.6% in 2013–14
      • 11.8% in 2022–23
      • 20% achieved in March 2025 (E20)
    • Future Plans:
      • Discussions on E27 blending target by 2030.
      • Government exploring flex-fuel vehicles (e.g., E85-capable (dual-fuel) cars).

    India’s Achievements:

    • Environmental Gains: 19.2 million tonnes of CO₂ emissions avoided (2014–2021).
    • Economic Impact: ₹26,000 crore saved in foreign exchange via reduced oil imports.
    • Industrial Growth:
      • Distillery capacity scaled up with interest subvention support.
      • Flex-fuel vehicles showcased by major automakers in 2025.
    • Farmer Benefit: Creates demand for sugarcane and grains, increasing farm income.

    Limitations:

    • Technical Challenges
      • Lower mileage with E20 due to reduced energy content.
      • Older vehicles may face engine compatibility issues.
      • Flex-fuel technology adoption still limited.
    • Economic Concerns
      • No drop in fuel prices despite ethanol savings.
      • Consumer hesitation due to lack of visible benefits.
    • Environmental Trade-offs
      • High land and water use for ethanol crops (especially sugarcane).
      • Food security risks from diverting food crops for fuel.
    • Need for Diversification
      • Majority of ethanol still from sugarcane; limited 2G ethanol usage.
      • Need to promote biomass-based ethanol (wood chips, crop residue).
    [UPSC 2025] Consider the following statements:

    Statement I: Of the two major ethanol producers in the world, i.e., Brazil and the United States of America, the former produces more ethanol than the latter.

    Statement II: Unlike in the United States of America where corn is the principal feedstock for ethanol production, sugarcane is the principal feedstock for ethanol production in Brazil.

    Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

    (a) Both Statement I and Statement II are correct and Statement II explains Statement I

    (b) Both Statement I and Statement II are correct but Statement II does not explain Statement I

    (c) Statement I is correct but Statement II is not correct

    (d) Statement I is not correct but Statement II is correct *

     

  • Population Census of Nilgiri Tahrs  

    Why in the News?

    A joint population census conducted by Kerala and Tamil Nadu has revealed the presence of 2,668 Nilgiri tahrs in the Western Ghats.

    Population Census of Nilgiri Tahrs  

    About Nilgiri Tahr (Nilgiritragus hylocrius):

    • Endemism: Found only in the Nilgiri Hills and southern Western Ghats of Tamil Nadu and Kerala, India.
    • Ecological Role: Key grazer in the montane grassland ecosystem, influencing plant growth and grassland regeneration.
    • Habitat:
      • Open montane grasslands interspersed with shola forests (South Western Ghats montane rain forests eco-region).
      • Occurs at elevations between 1,200 to 2,600 metres (3,900 to 8,500 feet).
      • Prefers steep rocky slopes, cliff edges, and grassy plateaus — areas with clear visibility to detect predators.
    • Population: Estimated 3,122 individuals in the wild; Locally extinct in about 14% of its historical habitat.
      • In Kerala (1,365): Eravikulam National Park (ENP) – largest single population (~841 individuals); Anamalai Hills landscape.
      • In Tamil Nadu (1303): Mukurthi National Park; Grass Hills National Park; Kalakkad-Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve (lesser presence)
    • Conservation Status:
      • IUCN Red List: Endangered
      • Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972: Schedule I
    • Cultural Significance:
      • Official state animal of Tamil Nadu.
      • Mentioned in Tamil Sangam literature (~2,000 years ago).
      • Seen in Mesolithic rock art (10,000–4,000 BC), indicating its deep historical importance.
    [UPSC 2018] Consider the following fauna of India:

    1. Gharial 2. Leatherback turtle 3. Swamp deer

    Which of the above is/are endangered?

    Options: (a) 1 and 2 only (b) 3 only (c) 1, 2 and 3 * (d) None