💥Mains Ready By December. Smash Mains & Smash PYQ Admissions Open
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Subject: Governance

Important aspects of Society

  • Bridging Gender Gaps in Cancer Care: The Lancet Commission Report

    women cancer

    Central Idea

    • The Lancet Commission report ‘Women, Power and Cancer’ spotlights the gender disparities in cancer care that persist in India.

    Women dying of Cancer: Alarming Statistics

    • The report emphasizes that approximately 6.9 million cancer-related deaths among Indian women were preventable, and 4.03 million were treatable.
    • It revealed that a staggering 63% of premature cancer-related deaths in Indian women could have been prevented through risk reduction, screening, and early diagnosis.
    • 37% could have been averted through timely and optimal treatment.

    Understanding the Gender Gap

    • Cancer Incidence and Mortality: Despite men being at a higher risk of certain cancers affecting both genders, women continue to face a significant burden of cancer incidence and mortality. Globally, women account for 48% of new cancer cases and 44% of cancer-related deaths. This happens even though some of the cancers in women, such as breast and cervical cancers, are highly preventable and treatable.
    • Root Causes: The report attributes this gender gap in cancer outcomes to several factors, including limited access to timely and appropriate care due to disparities in knowledge, decision-making power, and financial resources. Women, irrespective of their socioeconomic status, often lack the necessary information and autonomy for informed decision-making in healthcare.
    • Financial Strain: Additionally, women are more likely than men to experience financial devastation due to cancer-related expenses, compounding the challenges they face.

    Challenges in Cancer Care for Women

    • Underrepresentation: The report underscores that women are underrepresented in leadership roles in the field of cancer care. They are also susceptible to gender-based discrimination and harassment, making it a complex environment for women to thrive.
    • Unrecognized Contributions: Shockingly, women constitute the largest unpaid workforce in cancer care, with their contributions estimated to be worth approximately 3.66% of India’s national health expenditure.

    Expert Insights

    • Healthcare-Seeking Behavior: A healthcare expert highlights the impact of gendered healthcare-seeking behavior. Women, particularly in disadvantaged sections of society, tend to exhibit lower healthcare-seeking behavior, impacting their overall health outcomes.
    • Societal Changes: Beyond medical knowledge, societal changes are crucial. Women often hesitate to consult medical professionals for conditions like breast or cervical cancer, leading to delays in diagnosis and treatment.

    Significance of Screening

    • Preventable and Treatable Cancers: Breast and cervical cancers, two of the most common cancers in women, are highly preventable and treatable. Experts emphasize the importance of regular screenings.
    • Early Detection: Self-examination of breasts, annual clinical examinations by a medical professional, and mammography for women over 40 can aid in early breast cancer detection. For cervical cancer, regular screenings can identify pre-cancerous growth and the presence of the human papillomavirus.

    Government Interventions

    • Awareness Campaigns: Experts underscore the need for government-led awareness campaigns to promote cancer prevention and early detection, similar to those for other health initiatives.
    • Vaccination Programs: The government’s initiative to include vaccination programs for young girls is a positive step in reducing cancer incidence.
    • Primary Health Centers: Experts highlight the potential for primary health centers to play a more significant role in cancer diagnosis and early treatment, particularly for cervical cancer.

    Recommendations from the Report

    • Data Collection: Regularly collecting gender and social demographic data for cancer health statistics is crucial.
    • Policy Development: Developing, strengthening, and enforcing policies that reduce known cancer risks is essential.
    • Equitable Access: The report calls for equitable access to cancer research resources, leadership roles, and funding opportunities for women, addressing the gender imbalance in cancer care and research.

  • India’s Kidney Crisis

    What’s the news?

    • India faces a grave crisis in its healthcare landscape, particularly concerning the shortage of kidneys for transplantation.

    Central idea

    • India is grappling with a severe kidney crisis, marked by an alarming demand-supply gap in kidney transplantation. While kidney transplantation is the most effective treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD), India’s regulatory framework presents formidable obstacles to innovative kidney exchange methods.

    India’s Kidney Crisis

    • In 2022, over two lakh patients required kidney transplants, but only about 7,500 transplants, a mere 3.4%, were performed.
    • This alarming disparity can be attributed to the high prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in India, which affects approximately 17% of the population.
    • CKD often progresses to end-stage renal disease (ESRD), for which kidney transplantation is the most effective treatment in terms of quality of life, patient convenience, life expectancy, and cost-effectiveness.
    • However, India lags far behind developed countries like the United States, which performs about 20% of the needed kidney transplants.
    • Importantly, this gap is not solely due to a lack of medical facilities but is largely influenced by stringent regulations in India.

    Current kidney procurement methods in India

    • Deceased Donors:
    • Obtaining kidneys from deceased donors is one of the primary methods in India.
    • However, this method faces challenges due to low donation rates, specific conditions required for the nature of death, and the infrastructure needed to collect and store organs.
    • Families’ willingness to donate organs after a loved one’s death remains relatively low.
    • Living Relatives or Friends:
    • Another method for obtaining kidneys is through living relatives or friends.
    • Patients can request a kidney donation from a willing living individual who is a compatible match.
    • This approach requires compatibility in terms of blood type and tissue type, which can be a significant obstacle. It also involves complex emotional and ethical considerations.

    Challenges related to kidney procurement methods in India

    • Regulatory Barriers: Stringent regulations in India hinder innovative kidney exchange methods, such as kidney swaps and kidney chains. These regulations limit the participation of non-near-relatives in kidney swaps, and altruistic donations for kidney chains are often illegal.
    • Lack of Kidney Chains: Kidney chains, a method involving a series of altruistic donations, are nearly non-existent in India due to legal restrictions. In most Indian states, it is illegal to donate a kidney out of altruism.
    • Black Market for Kidneys: The stringent regulations around kidney exchange have led to the emergence of black markets for kidneys in India. The reference to selling a kidney is a mainstream expression, indicating the prevalence of such illegal operations.

    The need for regulatory reform

    • Stringent Regulations: Current regulations impede innovative kidney exchange methods, hindering non-near-relatives’ participation and banning altruistic donations in many states.
    • Missed Opportunities: India has missed chances to expand kidney supply through effective methods like kidney swaps and chains due to legal barriers.
    • Disparity in Regulations: Inconsistent regulations between swap transplants and direct donations raise questions about fairness.
    • Lack of Coordination: India lacks a national coordinating authority, making it difficult to create diverse donor-recipient pools.
    • Black Market Concerns: Stringent regulations have led to a black market for kidneys, endangering those involved.

    Key reforms so far

    • Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act 1994: This legislation laid the foundation for organ transplantation in India by recognizing the possibility of transplants from brain-stem death.
    • 2011 Amendment: In 2011, an amendment legalized swap transplants and initiated a national organ transplant program in India. This represented a significant step toward expanding transplantation options.
    • Reforms in February 2023: The government introduced reforms in February 2023, offering more flexibility in age and domicile requirements for organ registration. While noteworthy, the article suggests that these reforms fall short of addressing the core issue of inadequate kidney supply.

    Lessons for India to transform its own organ transplantation landscape

    • Altruistic Donations: Emulate countries like the US and the Netherlands in legalizing and encouraging altruistic kidney donations to expand the donor pool.
    • National Registries: Follow Spain and the UK by establishing national-level registries for kidney chains and swaps to streamline coordination.
    • International Collaboration: Explore international partnerships as seen in Spain to broaden the donor and recipient network.
    • Continuous Improvement: Commit to ongoing regulatory enhancements, inspired by the success of the United States in facilitating kidney swaps and chains.
    • Patient-Centric Approach: Prioritize patient-centered policies, drawing from global models, to improve patient access and quality of life.

    Conclusion

    • Reforming India’s kidney transplant laws is not only a matter of urgency but also a humanitarian imperative. Along with the domestic reforms, learning from global best practices is the key to addressing this critical issue and ensuring a brighter future for kidney transplant recipients in India.

    Also read:

    Organ transplant rules In India: A Significant Step

  • Tobacco Warnings on OTT Platforms: A Closer Look at the Debate

    tobacco

    Central Idea

    • The Central government’s regulations mandated long-duration smoking warnings for films and TV series on OTT platforms like Hotstar, Amazon, and Netflix.
    • Streaming websites voiced objections, raising concerns about user experience.

    Recent Development

    • According to a recent report, the government has agreed to find “pragmatic solutions” for stricter tobacco warnings on OTT platforms.
    • A closed-door meeting saw streaming executives engage with Health Ministry and Information and Broadcasting (I&B) Ministry officials.

    Why Smoking Warnings in Indian Entertainment?

    • Linking Health Impact and Public Perception: The introduction of smoking warnings in Indian entertainment stems from the connection between smoking’s health impact and its portrayal to the public. The goal is to communicate clear information about the health risks associated with smoking and discourage its use.
    • Regulation Evolution: The Indian government has a history of regulating how smoking is portrayed. The Cinematograph Act of 1952 prohibited the “glamorization” of tobacco in movies, and the Cable Television Networks Amendment Act of 2000 banned tobacco and alcohol advertising on cable TV.

    Historical Context

    • Factors Leading to Consensus: Several factors contributed to a growing national consensus on tobacco control, including increased health awareness, new laws and enforcement, judicial rulings (e.g., the 2008 ban on public smoking), civil society efforts, global support for tobacco control, and the influence of the World Health Organization.
    • COTPA and Health Ministry Notification: Under the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act (COTPA), signed into law in May 2003, the Health Ministry introduced a notification prohibiting the display of tobacco products in cinema and television programs.
    • Content Rules: This notification required films and shows produced before it to include health warnings regarding smoking as a prominent scroll at the bottom of the screen. It also recommended prohibiting smoking in public places and using pictorial health warnings covering 85% of tobacco product display areas.
    • Legal Challenges: Legal challenges arose as some filmmakers and actors argued that these rules violated their freedom of speech. The Delhi HC quashed the notification in 2009, but the Supreme Court later upheld the rules.

    Introduction of Health Spots

    • Consensus-Building Efforts: Amid legal disputes, I&B Ministry appointed a new minister, leading to attempts to reach consensus. In 2011, the Health Ministry introduced new rules after consultations with I&B Ministry, aiming to make them more practical and implementable.
    • Health Spots in Old Content: For films and shows made before these rules, anti-tobacco health spots or messages were required at the beginning and middle of television programs, made available to the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC).
    • Requirements for New Content: New films and TV shows with smoking scenes were to provide an “editorial justification” to the CBFC, include anti-tobacco health spots, display a prominent static message during tobacco product scenes, and feature an audio-visual disclaimer on the ill effects of tobacco use.

    Implementation Challenges

    • A study revealed that while many movies implemented at least one element of the film rules on tobacco imagery, few fully complied.
    • Compliance with other aspects of COTPA, such as restrictions on selling cigarettes near schools, has also been lacking.

    Debate over OTT Smoking Warnings

    • Content Library Concerns: I&B Ministry which regulates streaming platforms, expressed concerns about implementing warnings in existing content, foreign content, and health spots. It suggested displaying an appropriate health warning when users log in.
    • OTT Industry Concerns: In May, India ordered OTT platforms to insert static health warnings and anti-tobacco disclaimers. OTT executives raised concerns about the potential need to edit vast amounts of existing content, impacting user experience and creators’ freedom of expression.

  • Parliamentary Panel findings on the New Education Policy, 2020

    panel nep

    Central Idea

    • The Parliament Standing Committee on Education presented a report during a special parliamentary session focused on the “Implementation of the National Education Policy (NEP), 2020 in Higher Education.”

    Report Highlights

    • Salient NEP Features: The report examined the key aspects of NEP’s application in higher education and assessed the progress achieved thus far. The committee engaged with representatives from State governments, Union Ministries, higher education institutions, and stakeholders to compile the report.
    • State’s Role: The report emphasized the significance of State governments, as approximately 70% of the country’s 1,043 universities operate under State Acts. Furthermore, 94% of students are enrolled in State or private institutions, while only 6% attend Central higher educational institutions.

    Key Issues Discussed

    • Rigid Disciplinary Separation: The committee addressed issues such as the inflexible division of disciplines in higher education.
    • Limited Access in Disadvantaged Areas: It acknowledged the limited access to higher education in socio-economically disadvantaged regions.
    • Language of Instruction: The report highlighted the dearth of higher education institutes (HEIs) offering education in local languages.
    • Faculty Shortage: The committee noted the shortage of faculty members in HEIs.
    • Lack of Autonomy: Concerns about institutional autonomy and insufficient emphasis on research were also raised.
    • Regulatory System: The report identified the regulatory system as ineffective and criticized low standards of undergraduate education.

    Recommendations

    • Expansion of Multidisciplinary HEIs: The committee recommended that by 2030, every district in India should have at least one multidisciplinary higher education institution.
    • Enrolment Ratio Increase: It called for increasing the Gross Enrolment Ratio in higher education, including vocational education, from 26.3% in 2018 to 50% by 2035.
    • Socially and Economically Disadvantaged Groups (SEDGs): Actions proposed included allocating suitable funds for SEDGs, setting higher enrolment targets for SEDGs, improving gender balance in HEI admissions, offering more financial assistance and scholarships, ensuring inclusive admission processes and curricula, enhancing employability potential of higher education programs, and developing courses taught in regional languages and bilingually.
    • Infrastructure for Physically Challenged: Specific infrastructural enhancements were recommended to support physically challenged students, along with strict enforcement of non-discrimination and anti-harassment rules.
    • NEP Implementation in Jammu and Kashmir: The committee commended Jammu and Kashmir for its prompt implementation of NEP in all higher educational institutions from the 2022 academic session. It noted positive changes in teaching methods leading to enhanced lifelong learning opportunities for students.

    Funding Enhancement and Diversification

    • Effective Use of HEFA: The committee suggested improving the Higher Education Financing Agency (HEFA) to enhance funding for HEIs.
    • Diversified Funding Sources: It advised HEFA to diversify funding sources beyond government allocations by exploring partnerships with private sector organizations, philanthropic foundations, and international financial institutions.
    • Loan Interest Rates: The committee recommended reviewing and adjusting interest rates on loans provided by HEFA to make them more competitive and affordable for HEIs.

    Concerns about MEME Program

    • Feasibility Challenges: The panel raised concerns about the feasibility of implementing the multiple entry and multiple exit (MEME) system in Indian institutions.
    • Predictability Issues: MEME’s flexible structure, effective in Western educational institutions, might pose challenges in the country. Predicting student entry and exit numbers could disrupt the pupil-teacher ratio.

  • Safeguarding India’s Digital Youth: A Call for Ethical AI Regulation

    What’s the news?

    • India is poised to take center stage in the world of Artificial Intelligence (AI) with the upcoming Global AI Summit and the GPAI Global Summit.

    Central idea

    • As AI is projected to contribute significantly to India’s economy, accounting for 10% of its GDP by 2025, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has rightly called for a global framework on the ethical expansion of AI. In this context, it is imperative that India address the unique challenges concerning children and adolescents in the AI landscape.

    What is the Digital India Act, 2023?

    • The act is new legislation that aims to overhaul the decades-old Information Technology Act of 2000.
    • The Act covers a range of topics such as AI, cybercrime, data protection, deepfakes, competition issues among internet platforms, and online safety.
    • The Act also aims to address new complex forms of user harm that have emerged in the years since the IT Act’s enactment, such as catfishing, doxxing, trolling, and phishing.

    Key features of the Digital India Act

    • Creating new regulations around newer technology, including 5G, IoT devices, cloud computing, the metaverse, blockchain, and cryptocurrency
    • Reclassifying online intermediaries into separate categories instead of one general intermediary label, each with its own set of regulations
    • Removing safe harbor immunity for online intermediaries for purposeful misinformation or other content violations from third parties
    • Creating digital standards and laws regarding artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technology
    • Criminalizing cyberbullying, identity theft, and unauthorized sharing of personal information without consent.

    Addressing the Governance Challenge through the Digital India Act

    • Establish a regulatory framework that aligns industry incentives with the well-being of young users.
    • Implement measures to combat exploitative AI practices, ensuring the safety and mental health of children and adolescents.
    • Provide guidance and tools for families to navigate the digital landscape responsibly.
    • Promote inclusivity and fairness by addressing biases and discrimination in AI systems.
    • Revise data protection provisions to strike a balance between privacy and personalization, recognizing the unique needs of young users.

    Way Forward: Rethinking Child-Centric AI Regulation

    • International Best Practices:
    • India can draw on international best practices to develop child-centric AI regulations.
    • UNICEF’s guidance for policymakers on AI and children, aligned with the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, provides a framework for creating an enabling environment that prioritizes children’s well-being, inclusion, fairness, non-discrimination, safety, transparency, explaining ability, and accountability.
    • Age-Appropriate Design:
    • Learning from California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act, Indian authorities can push for transparency in digital services by configuring default privacy settings, assessing the impact of algorithms and data collection on children, and using age-appropriate language for user-facing information.
    • Research on AI’s benefits and risks for Indian children and adolescents should inform the development of an Indian Age-Appropriate Design Code for AI.
    • Engaging Young Voices:
    • Establishing institutions for regular dialogue with children and adolescents is crucial.
    • Similar to Australia’s Online Safety Youth Advisory Council, these institutions could comprise individuals between the ages of 13 and 24.
    • Such entities will help regulators better understand the threats young people face while interacting with AI systems and preserve the benefits they derive from digital services.

    Conclusion

    • In the era of rapidly evolving AI, India’s regulatory approach must prioritize openness, trust, and accountability over rigid prescriptions. As India progresses towards comprehensive Internet regulation and seeks to lead in global AI governance, safeguarding the interests of its young citizens should remain at the forefront of its policy agenda.

    Also read:

    Laying the foundation for a future-ready digital India

  • Mediation Act, 2023

    What’s the news?

    • During the recent monsoon session of Parliament, both Houses passed the Mediation Bill, 2023, now known as the Mediation Act, 2023.

    Central Idea

    • The discourse surrounding India’s litigation system invariably leads to discussions on alternative dispute resolution (ADR). Given the delays and escalating costs associated with Indian court proceedings, the significance of ADR cannot be overstated. While arbitration and conciliation have traditionally dominated these discussions, the recent passage of the Mediation Act of 2023 signals a pivotal shift towards recognizing the importance of mediation.

    About the Mediation Act, 2023

    • During the monsoon session of Parliament, the Mediation Bill, 2023, was passed in both Houses, subsequently receiving the President’s assent and being referred to as the Mediation Act, 2023.
    • This Act builds upon India’s existing legal framework, which encourages courts to refer disputing parties to ADR, including mediation, if settlement possibilities exist. However, the Act takes a significant step forward by obligating parties to engage in pre-litigation mediation, regardless of prior agreements.
    • To facilitate this process, the Act mandates courts and relevant institutions to maintain a panel of mediators.

    Potential benefits of the Mediation Act, 2023

    • Reduction of Frivolous Claims: The Act’s requirement for pre-litigation mediation is expected to reduce the filing of frivolous claims in Indian courts. Parties will be compelled to explore amicable settlements through mediation before resorting to litigation, which can help filter out cases that lack merit.
    • Efficient Dispute Resolution: The Act’s provision for completing mediations within 180 days from the parties’ first appearance promotes efficient dispute resolution. This can lead to quicker resolutions compared to potentially protracted court proceedings, saving time and resources for all parties involved.
    • Expertise and Neutrality: The Act mandates that mediations be conducted by empaneled mediators who are neutral and possess expertise in the field. This ensures that parties receive professional guidance from unbiased experts, enhancing the prospects of a fair and impartial resolution.
    • Reduced Burden on Indian Courts: By encouraging pre-litigation mediation, the Act aims to reduce the caseload of Indian courts. This could result in expedited court proceedings for cases that do proceed to litigation, relieving the burden on the judiciary and potentially reducing court backlogs.
    • Promotion of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR): The Act aligns with the broader goal of promoting ADR mechanisms in India. It recognizes mediation as a valuable tool for reducing court congestion and promoting efficient dispute resolution, aligning with international best practices.
    • Institutional Mediation: The Act’s emphasis on institutional mediation can enhance the professionalism and accessibility of mediation services in India. This institutional framework can provide parties with the necessary infrastructure and support for effective dispute resolution.
    • India as a Global Hub for Dispute Resolution: The Act’s provisions, along with the emphasis on ADR, aim to position India as a global hub for various aspects of commercial dispute resolution. This aligns with international best practices and can attract international businesses seeking efficient dispute resolution services.

    Concerns associated with the act

    • Coercion and sincerity: There may be concerns about parties feeling compelled to engage in mediation even if they are not genuinely interested in pursuing a settlement. Mandatory mediation may raise questions about the sincerity of the parties’ participation.
    • Delays in Urgent Cases: While the Act allows for urgent interim relief from the court in exceptional circumstances, there may still be concerns about potential delays in urgent cases due to mandatory pre-mediation proceedings.
    • Mediator Availability: Ensuring a sufficient pool of qualified mediators may be a challenge. The Act’s requirement for empaneled mediators could lead to a shortage of available mediators, potentially causing delays in mediation processes.
    • Balancing Neutrality and Expertise: Striking the right balance between mediator neutrality and expertise can be challenging. Concerns may arise regarding mediator bias or perceived bias in some cases.
    • Implementation Challenges: Implementing the Act effectively and ensuring compliance by all parties and institutions may pose challenges. Adequate training, infrastructure, and support for mediators and mediation service providers will be essential for successful implementation.

    Alignment of Mediation and Commercial Arbitration

    • Similar Legal Framework: The Mediation Act, 2023, effectively positions mediation on par with commercial arbitration in India. Both forms of dispute resolution share a similar legal framework with several common elements.
    • Stringent Timelines: Both mediation and commercial arbitration, as governed by their respective legislation, impose stringent timelines for the conduct of proceedings. This ensures that disputes are resolved efficiently and within defined timeframes.
    • Mandate for Confidentiality: Both mediation and arbitration proceedings mandate confidentiality. This confidentiality requirement ensures that the details of the dispute and the resolution process remain private, which can be advantageous for businesses and individuals involved in sensitive matters.
    • Court Referral: The Act, similar to legislation governing arbitration, obligates Indian courts to refer disputing parties to either mediation or arbitration. This reflects a broader trend toward encouraging alternative dispute resolution mechanisms before resorting to litigation.
    • Appointment of Neutrals: Both mediation and arbitration involve the appointment of neutral third parties. In mediation, this is the mediator, while in arbitration, it’s the arbitrator. These neutrals play a crucial role in facilitating the resolution process and ensuring impartiality.
    • Enforceability: Both mediation and arbitration legislation emphasize the enforceability of agreements. The Act ensures the enforceability of mediated settlement agreements, while arbitration legislation ensures the enforceability of arbitral awards.
    • Council Establishment: The Act proposes the establishment of the Mediation Council of India, which mirrors the proposed Arbitration Council of India. This underscores the recognition of mediation as a significant dispute resolution mechanism alongside arbitration.

    Parliament’s Message

    • The Act conveys a clear message to Indian industry: in commercial matters, courts should no longer be the default venue for dispute resolution.
    • Parties are encouraged to resolve disputes amicably through mediation or commercial arbitration, with access to Indian courts considered a last resort.
    • This paradigm shift will foster camaraderie between mediation and arbitration, alleviating the burden on the judiciary.

    Conclusion

    • The Mediation Act, 2023, marks a transformative moment in Indian dispute resolution. It positions mediation as a powerful tool to amicably settle disputes, alongside commercial arbitration. By encouraging parties to explore alternative avenues for resolution and prioritizing institutional mediation, India aims to not only ease the burden on its courts but also emerge as a global leader in commercial dispute resolution.

    Also read:

    Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanism – NCA, Lok Adalats, etc.

  • Propelling India’s development the right way

    What’s the news?

    • The op-ed acknowledges India’s technological achievements, emphasizing the need to revive state support, particularly in emerging sectors. It underscores the urgency of addressing persistent inequalities and promoting inclusive economic growth for a more prosperous future.

    Central idea

    • Aim for the moon is often synonymous with bold ambition, verging on recklessness. India’s foray into space research in the 1960s was initially met with skepticism, given its status as a young and struggling nation. Today, India boasts remarkable achievements in space exploration. However, these accomplishments raise a pertinent question: How do these feats align with the persistent poverty and destitution afflicting millions of Indians?

    Historical Foundations of India’s Scientific and Technological Capabilities

    • Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs): Between 1951 and 1961, India founded five Indian Institutes of Technology. These institutions rapidly gained global recognition as centers of academic excellence. They played a critical role in nurturing a talent pool of engineers and scientists who would later contribute to India’s technological advancements.
    • Indian Institutes of Management (IIMs): In 1961, India inaugurated the first two Indian Institutes of Management. These institutions aimed to foster managerial talent, aligning with India’s broader goals of building expertise and human capital in various fields.
    • Public Sector Units (PSUs): Throughout the 1950s and 1960s, India established numerous public sector units across diverse industrial sectors. These sectors included steel production, fertilizer manufacturing, machine tools, electric machinery, drug production, and petrochemicals. These PSUs not only bolstered industrialization but also served as vital testing grounds for emerging technologies.

    India’s Moonshot Development Strategy

    • The moonshot development strategy aimed to leverage modern industrialization to address developmental challenges.
    • Early visionaries like Vikram Sarabhai envisioned satellite technology for nationwide communication, agricultural improvements, and healthcare education.
    • Nevertheless, this approach faced criticism for its heavy reliance on public investment and the alleged misdirection of resources toward capital- and technology-intensive industries instead of labor-intensive sectors.

    How have inequalities posed significant hurdles to India’s progress and development?

    • Lack of Effective Government Intervention:
    • India’s development strategy’s lackluster record was not due to excessive government emphasis on technology but rather because the government could not effectively address inequalities and ensure social development.
    • One of the missed opportunities was the failure to implement a successful program of land redistribution.
    • Ownership Disparities: Ownership of assets remains significantly low among socially oppressed communities, including Dalits and the Scheduled Caste (SC) population. This lack of asset ownership creates barriers to accessing education and economic opportunities.
    • Education Underinvestment: India has consistently underinvested in basic education for the masses. This educational deficit further exacerbates inequalities and limits opportunities for those who are socioeconomically disadvantaged.
    • Replicated Inequalities in the Labor Market: The historical inequalities in social and economic spheres translate into labor market disparities. Better-paying jobs tend to be concentrated among privileged groups with greater access to higher education, further deepening the divide.
    • Employment Disparities: The data from the Periodic Labour Force Survey highlights significant disparities in employment. In 2021–22, a higher percentage of SC workers (38.2%) were engaged in casual employment, which often involves manual labor, compared to workers from other general category castes (11.2%).
    • Contrast with East Asian Countries: East Asian countries like Japan and China implemented land reforms and other measures in the 1950s that created a relatively egalitarian social structure. This laid the foundation for progressive economic and social changes in the subsequent years.
    • Impact on Industrial and Economic Growth: Inequalities have negatively impacted industrial and economic growth in India. The skewed domestic demand, driven by the upper-income classes, has hindered the growth of manufacturing sectors producing high-quality, mass-consumption goods like food products and garments.
    • Narrow Social Base for Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurship in India has emerged from a narrow social base, limiting the diversity and inclusivity of the entrepreneurial ecosystem.

    Way forward

    • Reinstate state support:
    • India should recognize the strengths and weaknesses of its post-independence development strategy.
    • The audacious attempt to build technological and industrial capabilities with generous state support was the right approach.
    • India must reinstate such efforts, especially in rapidly growing economic sectors like semiconductors and biotechnology.
    • Abandoning industrial policy in a globalized economy, as done after 1991, is a mistake, especially when countries like the United States and China actively support their industries.
    • Make Economic Growth Inclusive:
    • India needs to redouble efforts to ensure that economic growth is inclusive and broad-based.
    • Access to education, particularly higher education, should be made accessible to all, including marginalized communities.
    • Strengthen human and social capabilities:
    • While technology has played a significant role in India’s development, it’s equally important to focus on building human and social capabilities.
    • Empowering the billion-strong population with the skills and capabilities required for upward mobility is crucial.
    • Achieving this would be equivalent to a significant leap in economic progress.

    Conclusion

    • India’s journey toward technological prowess should coexist with a commitment to alleviate inequality and ensure inclusive growth. A moonshot approach to development, grounded in state support for technological advancement, is imperative. By reconciling these objectives, India can pave the way for a prosperous and equitable future.

  • Women’s share in Assemblies less than 10% in 20 States

    Women

    What’s the news?

    • The BJP government presented the Women’s Reservation Bill as its top priority in the newly inaugurated Parliament House.

    Central idea

    • The 128th Constitutional Amendment Bill, 2023, known as the Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam, proposes reserving one-third of seats in the Lok Sabha and State Assemblies for women. Prime Minister Narendra Modi hailed the bill as a historic decision and framed it as a divine mandate to empower women. The Lok Sabha, after a day of deliberations, passed the bill.

    Historical Context

    • The Women’s Reservation Bill has a long and arduous history.
    • It was initially introduced in 1996 by the H.D. Deve Gowda-led United Front government but failed to gain approval.
    • Subsequent attempts to pass the bill faced similar fates, lapsing with the dissolution of houses.

    Key Provisions of the Bill

    • Reservation Percentage: The Constitution (One Hundred and Twenty-eighth Amendment) Bill, 2023, proposes 33% reservation for women in Lok Sabha and state Legislative Assemblies.
    • Inclusion of Marginalized Groups: The reservation also includes seats reserved for women belonging to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes.
    • Constitutional Amendments: The Bill introduces new articles, 330A and 332A, in the Constitution specifically for Lok Sabha and state assemblies, respectively.
    • Duration of Reservation: The proposed reservation will be in effect for 15 years from the commencement of the Act.
    • Dependence on Delimitation: Implementation of the reservation is contingent upon the completion of the delimitation process.

    The current representation of women

    • Parliament:
    • As of now, the Lok Sabha has only 82 women members, constituting 15% of its total strength.
    • India has never seen a higher representation of women in its Parliament, even after over 70 years of electoral history.
    • In the 2019 general election, the share of women candidates was a mere 9%.
    • State Legislative Assemblies:
    • The situation in state legislative assemblies is even bleaker, with only Tripura surpassing the 15% mark.
    • Over 20 states and Union Territories have less than 10% women representation, including Gujarat, Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Telangana, and Karnataka.

    Party-wise Analysis

    • Women’s representation across different political parties in the Lok Sabha
    • Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP): Currently, women make up just 13.5% of the BJP’s Lok Sabha members.
    • Biju Janata Dal (BJD): BJD leads in women’s representation, with 41.7% of its Lok Sabha MPs being women.
    • Trinamool Congress: Trinamool Congress follows closely, with 40.9% women MPs in the Lok Sabha.
    • Distribution of women MLAs in State Legislative Assemblies
    • West Bengal (Trinamool Congress): The Trinamool Congress in West Bengal boasts the highest percentage of women MLAs, standing at 15.3%.
    • Chhattisgarh (Congress): The Congress party in Chhattisgarh has 14.7% women MLAs, demonstrating a significant presence of women in the state assembly.
    • Political parties that lag behind in terms of women’s representation
    • Karnataka (Congress): The Congress party in Karnataka has only 3% women MLAs, indicating a significant gender disparity.
    • Telangana (Bharat Rashtra Samithi): The Bharat Rashtra Samithi in Telangana fares similarly poorly, with just 3.4% of women MLAs.
    • Tamil Nadu (Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam, DMK): DMK in Tamil Nadu has a relatively low representation of women MLAs, with only 4.5% women in the state assembly.

    Just to know:  

    • The highest proportion of women representatives elected to the Lok Sabha so far was in the 2019 elections, and it was less than 15 percent of total
    • The number of women candidates and MPs varies greatly across states and parties.
    • In the present Lok Sabha (17th), Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal have the highest numbers of women MPs. In terms of percentage, Goa and Manipur had fielded the highest proportion of women candidates.

    Women

    India’s parliamentary representation of women compared to other nations

    • India: India’s current women’s representation in parliament stands at a modest 15%, which, although an improvement, remains relatively low.
    • Iran: India ranks just above Iran, which has only 6% women representation in its parliament.
    • South Africa: In contrast, South Africa has made significant strides in women’s representation, with a considerably higher proportion of women in its national legislature.
    • Ethiopia: Ethiopia has also seen remarkable progress in gender parity within its national legislatures.

    Challenges to Female Representation

    • Party Ticket Allocation: Despite pledges in party constitutions, records show that women candidates receive disproportionately fewer party tickets, often relying on family political connections.
    • Perceived Electability: The belief that women candidates are less likely to win elections hampers their ticket allocation.
    • Structural Barriers: Demanding and time-consuming election campaigns, coupled with family responsibilities, deter many women from active participation.
    • Vulnerability: Women politicians face humiliation, abuse, and threats, making participation even more challenging.
    • Financial Constraints: High campaign costs, limited financial independence, and a lack of party support create hurdles for women candidates.
    • Internalized Patriarchy: Many women prioritize family and household duties over political ambitions due to ingrained patriarchal norms.

    Need for such a reservation

    • Ensuring Representation: Reservation guarantees women’s presence in decision-making bodies, addressing underrepresentation.
    • Encouraging Entry: Reservation encourages women to enter politics, contest elections, and engage in the political process.
    • Capacity Building: Participation in legislative processes enhances women’s political capacity, nurturing effective leaders.
    • Changing Perceptions: Reservation shifts societal attitudes toward women in politics, challenging stereotypes and promoting participation.
    • Promoting Gender-Sensitive Policies: Women politicians advocate for gender-sensitive policies addressing issues like violence against women and discrimination.

    Conclusion

    • The passage of the Women’s Reservation Bill marks a historic moment in Indian politics. Achieving gender parity in political representation is a vital step towards a more inclusive democracy. It is imperative that all stakeholders work together to ensure the effective implementation of this landmark legislation and uplift women’s voices in the decision-making process.

    Also read:

    73rd and 74th Amendments and Reservation for Women

  • Challenge of Non-Communicable Disease in India

    What’s the news?

    • India, with its emerging leadership in global issues, faces the challenge of rising NCDs, including diabetes and heart diseases. The healthcare industry calls for collaboration to address this crisis, highlighting India’s progress in healthcare, its role as a Medical Value Travel hub, and its potential in AI-driven healthcare innovations.

    Central idea

    • In recent years, India has emerged as a prominent voice on the global stage, leading the way in critical areas such as climate change, electrification, manufacturing, and space exploration. India’s achievements include successfully landing a mission near the moon’s south pole and a successful G-20 presidency. However, as India aims to become a global leader, it must confront a looming health crisis of NCDs.

    What are Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs)?

    • NCDs are also known as chronic diseases, which are not caused by infectious agents and are not transmissible from person to person.
    • NCDs are long-lasting and progress slowly, typically taking years to manifest symptoms.
    • Examples of NCDs include cardiovascular diseases, cancer, chronic respiratory diseases, and diabetes.
    • These diseases are often caused by modifiable risk factors such as an unhealthy diet, a lack of physical activity, tobacco and alcohol use, and environmental factors.
    • NCDs are a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, accounting for around 70% of all deaths.

    India’s NCD challenge

    • Diabetes and Hypertension Prevalence: India is facing a high prevalence of NCDs, particularly diabetes and hypertension, which affect millions of people.
    • Youth Health Issues: The burden of NCDs is increasingly affecting India’s youth, leading to heart attacks, cancer, respiratory problems, depression, and more.
    • Economic Consequences: If unchecked, India’s NCD burden could lead to an economic cost of nearly $4 trillion by 2030. This poses a significant roadblock to India’s development and is compared to an age tax on the country’s demographic dividend.

    India’s healthcare progress

    • Improved Health Metrics: India has witnessed notable improvements in key health metrics.
    • Infant Mortality: India has witnessed a remarkable improvement in infant mortality rates, which have decreased by four times from previous levels.
    • Maternal Mortality: Maternal mortality rates have shown remarkable progress as well, decreasing by seven times from earlier rates.
    • Average Life Expectancy: The average life expectancy of an Indian has increased by nearly 30%, rising from 55 years to over 70 years, reflecting the overall improvement in healthcare and quality of life in the country.
    • World-Class Healthcare Infrastructure: India is described as having world-class healthcare infrastructure. Investments have been made in modern hospitals, clinics, and medical facilities to provide high-quality healthcare services.
    • Clinical Excellence: India is noted for its pool of highly skilled clinical talent. These healthcare professionals are capable of delivering best-in-class clinical outcomes and providing healthcare services at a scale and cost that are favorable compared to the global average.

    India as a Medical Value Travel (MVT) hub

    • Global MVT Hub: India has emerged as a prominent global destination for MVT, attracting patients from around the world, particularly in specialized medical fields such as oncology, orthopedics, and robotic surgery.
    • Advanced Medical Technology: India has invested in state-of-the-art medical technology and facilities, including the introduction of proton beam therapy for cancer treatment, positioning itself as a regional leader in cancer care.
    • Highly Skilled Healthcare Professionals: India has a highly skilled and trained workforce of healthcare professionals known for their expertise in complex procedures, including joint replacements, spinal surgeries, and robotic-assisted surgeries.
    • Minimally Invasive Techniques: Many medical procedures in India are conducted using minimally invasive techniques, attracting patients seeking precise and less invasive treatments.
    • Cost-Effective Care: India offers cost-effective healthcare services, making it an attractive destination for patients seeking high-quality medical care at competitive prices.
    • Growth Potential: India’s MVT sector has significant growth potential, capable of creating employment opportunities and contributing to foreign exchange earnings.

    India’s potential for harnessing Artificial Intelligence (AI) to transform the healthcare sector

    • AI in Healthcare Transformation: AI is rapidly reshaping healthcare worldwide, and India is poised to play a leading role in this transformation. India has a wealth of talented data scientists, engineers, and healthcare professionals capable of driving innovation in AI-driven healthcare solutions.
    • Diagnostic Advancements: AI can significantly impact diagnostics by enhancing accuracy and efficiency in medical diagnoses. AI-powered tools can lead to faster treatment decisions and improved patient outcomes. Moreover, AI can aid in predicting disease outbreaks, analyzing healthcare data, optimizing treatment plans, expediting healthcare procedures, and revolutionizing drug discovery.
    • India’s Progress in AI: India has already made strides in the application of AI in healthcare. However, to maintain and strengthen its leadership position, India must continue to invest in research and development, encourage collaborations between academia and industry, and create an ecosystem that fosters innovation.
    • Economic Potential: The AI expenditure in the country is expected to reach $11.78 billion by 2025 and could contribute $1 trillion to India’s economy by 2035.

    Way forward

    • AI-Driven Healthcare Transformation: India should fully embrace the transformative potential of AI in healthcare. This involves integrating AI-powered solutions for diagnostics, treatment optimization, and healthcare procedures.
    • Investment in R&D: India should continue and increase investment in research and development to drive healthcare innovation. Funding and supporting research initiatives will be crucial for advancements in healthcare technology.
    • Collaboration Between Academia and Industry: Strengthening partnerships between academic institutions and the healthcare industry is essential. These collaborations can expedite the application of research findings to practical healthcare solutions.
    • Nurturing an Innovation Ecosystem: India should create an ecosystem conducive to healthcare innovation. This includes supporting healthcare startups, offering incentives for innovation, and facilitating the growth of healthcare technology companies.
    • Economic Potential of AI: Recognizing the economic potential of AI in healthcare, India should actively invest in AI-driven healthcare solutions. The expected growth in AI expenditure presents an opportunity to contribute significantly to the country’s economy.
    • Community Health Focus: Prioritizing community health is essential. Initiatives aimed at improving public health, creating awareness about preventive measures, and addressing healthcare disparities should be emphasized.
    • Public-Private Collaboration: Collaboration between the public and private sectors is critical. Joint efforts can lead to infrastructure development, the promotion of medical tourism, and the establishment of international healthcare accreditation bodies.
    • Leadership in NCD Prevention: India should take a leading role in addressing non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Comprehensive strategies, including prevention, early detection, and effective management, should be at the forefront of healthcare efforts.

    Conclusion

    • India stands at a critical juncture in its healthcare journey. By reimagining its healthcare model, India can position itself as a global leader in medical value travel, a powerhouse in AI-driven healthcare solutions, and a trailblazer in combating NCDs. With concerted efforts and a commitment to excellence, India can forge a healthier and more prosperous future for generations to come, truly realizing its destiny as a global leader.

    Also read:

    India’s Rising Burden of Diabetes: Urgent Actions Needed

  • Post Office Bill (2023)

    What’s the news?

    • The Post Office Bill, 2023, was introduced in the Rajya Sabha on August 10, 2023. It repeals the Indian Post Office Act, 1898.

    Central idea

    • The recent introduction of the Post Office Bill (2023) in the Rajya Sabha marks a significant shift in India’s postal landscape. The new bill recognizes the evolving role of post offices in the digital age, where they serve as a crucial conduit for a wide range of citizen-centric services.

    Key provisions and changes introduced by the bill

    • Repealing the Indian Post Office Act, 1898: The Post Office Bill, 2023, seeks to replace the outdated Indian Post Office Act of 1898 and addresses various aspects of the functioning of India Post.
    • Exclusive Privileges of the Central Government: Unlike the previous Act, which granted the central government exclusive privileges in establishing posts and conveying letters, the new bill does not contain such privileges. However, it does specify that the Post Office will retain the exclusive privilege of issuing postage stamps.
    • Services to be prescribed: While the old Act specified the services provided by the Post Office, such as delivering postal articles and money orders, the new bill allows the central government to prescribe the services to be offered by the Post Office.
    • Powers to Intercept Shipments: The bill introduces new grounds for intercepting shipments transmitted through the post, including security of the state, friendly relations with foreign states, public order, emergency, public safety, and contravention of the provisions of the Bill or any other law. An officer empowered by the central government may carry out an interception.
    • Director General’s Regulations: The Director General of Postal Services, as provided in both the old Act and the new bill, may make regulations regarding various activities necessary for providing postal services. This includes specifying charges, supply, and sale of postage stamps and postal stationery.
    • Examination of Shipments: The bill removes the powers of examination of shipments by Post Office officers. Instead, it allows the central government to empower an officer of the Post Office to deliver the shipment to customs authorities or other specified authorities for handling.
    • Removal of Offenses and Penalties: Unlike the old Act, which specified various offences and penalties, the new bill does not provide for many offences or consequences. However, it does state that amounts not paid or neglected by a user will be recoverable as arrears of land revenue.
    • Exemptions from Liability: Both the old Act and the new bill maintain provisions that exempt the government and officers from liability related to the loss, misdelivery, delay, or damage to a postal article. The bill allows the Post Office to prescribe liability regarding its services instead of the central government.

    What changes?

    • Flexibility in Pricing and Service Regulation:
    • The new bill grants the postal department the flexibility to determine the prices of its services.
    • This flexibility is seen as crucial in a highly competitive industry, enabling the postal department to respond quickly to market demands.
    • It also allows the department to adapt to changing economic conditions while offering a variety of citizen-centric services.
    • Enhanced Security Measures:
    • The bill empowers the central government to take action in cases where the security of the state, friendly relations with foreign states, public order, emergencies, public safety, or contraventions of the law are at stake.
    • Specifically, any item in the course of transmission by the Post Office can be intercepted, opened, or detained under these circumstances.
    • This provision is seen as a response to modern challenges, including the smuggling and unlawful transmission of drugs and contraband goods through postal parcels.
    • Generic Provisions for Intercepting Items:
    • Unlike the existing Act (1898), which specifically mentioned intercepting postal articles containing explosive dangerous, filthy, noxious or deleterious substances, the new bill contains more generic language.
    • This change is intended to address a broader range of potential security threats and criminal activities involving postal parcels.
    • Limited Jurisdiction over Courier Firms:
    • The bill’s provisions for intercepting, opening, or detaining items in the course of postal transmission are applicable to the Post Office. However, there is no similar legislation mentioned for courier firms.
    • Given that India Post holds less than 15% of the market share in the courier/express/parcels (CEP) industry, the bill’s effectiveness in intercepting items for national security and public service reasons has limitations.
    • Potential Inclusion of Medium and Small Courier Players:
    • The bill could have been strengthened by including provisions for medium and small courier operators to register with a designated authority.
    • Such provisions would have given the bill more control over the movement of contraband goods in parcels, even in the courier industry.

    Futuristic Postal Delivery

    • The new Bill introduces standards for addressing items, address identifiers, and postcodes.
    • These standards may enable the use of digital codes based on geo-spatial coordinates instead of traditional physical addresses.
    • Benefits include improved sorting efficiency and accurate delivery of mail and parcels.
    • The adoption of digital addressing could potentially facilitate parcel deliveries by drones, similar to experiments in some other countries.
    • The transition to these futuristic concepts is acknowledged to be a gradual process.

    Removal of Exclusive Privilege

    • A significant aspect of the Bill is the removal of a provision from the 1898 Act that granted the central government exclusive privileges in postal services.
    • These privileges included conveying letters by post and performing related services.
    • The provision had lost its relevance with the emergence of courier services in India since the 1980s.
    • The absence of a clear definition of letter versus document in the Act and subsequent rules had led to legal ambiguity.
    • The removal of this exclusive privilege is viewed as a positive step, aligning the legal framework with the changing communication landscape.
    • The importance of traditional written personal communication through letters has decreased significantly with the mobile revolution.
    • The removal of this provision is seen as a recognition of this reality.

    Conclusion

    • The new Post Office Bill (2023) represents a vital step toward modernizing India’s postal services to align with contemporary needs. It eliminates the outdated provision of exclusive privileges, adapting to the realities of the digital age and ensuring that India’s postal sector remains relevant and accessible to all citizens.