💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF

Subject: History

  • In news: Mitakshara Law of Succession

    Central Idea

    • The Supreme Court clarified that children born from void or voidable marriages can inherit the parent’s share in a joint Hindu family property governed by Mitakshara law.
    • However, the inheritance rights are limited to the parent’s share and do not extend to other family members’ properties.

    Mitakshara School of Law

    History Originated in ancient India; attributed to Vijnaneshvara, a 12th-century scholar
    Focus Interpretation of Yajnavalkya Smriti in matters of family, property, and inheritance law
    Ancestral Property Emphasis on joint family property and ancestral property rights
    Inheritance Defines rules for succession and inheritance within Hindu families
    Variations Different regional interpretations, including the “Dayabhaga” School
    Regional Influence Widespread influence on Hindu legal practices, especially in property law
    Development Evolved over time and influenced by legal reforms and societal changes
    Modern Context Coexists with contemporary legal frameworks and personal laws
    Significance Played a significant role in shaping Hindu family and property law

    Nature of Marriages and Law

    • A voidable marriage is made invalid by the husband or wife through a decree.
    • A void marriage is invalid from the beginning.
    • Mitakshara Law of Succession applies to Hindu Undivided Families across India, except West Bengal and Assam.

    Ruling Details

    • The Supreme Court, headed by Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, clarified that the child from a void or voidable marriage cannot claim rights to other family members’ properties.
    • The child’s inheritance rights pertain only to the parent’s share in the ancestral property.
    • A “notional partition” is conducted to ascertain the parent’s share immediately before their death.

    Inheritance Calculation

    • The law assumes a partition of the ancestral property between the deceased parent and other family members before the parent’s death.
    • The child’s inheritance is based on the share the parent would have received through this notional partition.

    Legal Basis

    • Section 16 of the Hindu Marriage Act grants legitimacy to children born from void or voidable marriages.
    • The court held that these children have the right to their parents’ property.
    • The intent of granting legitimacy to such children in the Hindu Marriage Act is reflected in the Hindu Succession Act.

    Impact of Amendment

    • The Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, allows a deceased person’s share in a joint Hindu family property to devolve to heirs by testamentary or intestate succession.
    • Before the amendment, devolution occurred only through survivorship.
    • Equal rights of succession are now granted to women as well as men.

    Background and Precedents

    • The case was centered on Section 16(3) of the Hindu Marriage Act.
    • In 2011, a Division Bench of the Supreme Court championed the rights of children born from illegitimate marriages to inherit their parents’ properties.
    • The Division Bench emphasized that these children deserve the same rights as those born from valid marriages.

    Conclusion

    • The concept of legitimacy evolves with changing social norms.
    • The court observed that what was considered illegitimate in the past may be legitimate today.
    • Children born from void or voidable marriages should not be denied inheritance rights based on evolving social consensus.
  • 2023 Ramon Magsaysay Award to Indian Oncologist

    Ramon Magsaysay

    Central Idea

    • Dr. R. Ravi Kannan, a surgical oncologist and Director of Cachar Cancer Hospital and Research Centre (CCHRC) in Assam, has been named one of the 2023 Ramon Magsaysay Awardees.
    • His pioneering efforts have revolutionized cancer treatment in Assam by prioritizing people-centric and pro-poor healthcare solutions.

    Dr. Kannan’s Inspiring Work

    • Under Dr. Kannan’s guidance, CCHRC evolved from having limited facilities to encompassing 28 departments, including oncology, pathology, radiology, microbiology, epidemiology, and palliative care.
    • The hospital introduced pro-poor measures such as free treatment, lodging, meals, ad hoc employment for caregivers, and a homecare program to address patients’ challenges in continuing treatment due to poverty and distance.
    • The hospital team extended their support by providing training to family members in pain management and palliative care, and distributing free medicines.
    • As a result, the compliance rate for cancer treatment increased remarkably, from 28% to 70%.

    About Ramon Magsaysay Award

    • The Ramon Magsaysay Award, established in 1958, stands as a significant accolade, often referred to as Asia’s equivalent of the Nobel Prize.
    • This prestigious award honors individuals and organizations in Asia for their exceptional contributions to society across various domains.

    Who was Ramon Magsaysay?

    • Ramon Magsaysay was the Philippines’ president from 1953 until his tragic death in a plane crash in 1957.
    • He gained prominence during World War II when Japanese forces occupied the Philippines, then a US colony.
    • In December 1953, he was elected president from the Nationalist Party, the country’s oldest political party.
    • Post-war chaos gripped the Philippines in 1946, accompanied by a widening gap between the rich and poor, exacerbated by the expansion of capitalism.
    • Amidst suspicions of communist affiliations and demands for peasant rights, leaders were targeted by the government, aligned with the USA.
    • Magsaysay’s administrative and military strategies played a pivotal role in countering the perceived threat of communism.

    Indian Awardees: A Legacy of Excellence

    Eminent Indians have been recognized through the Ramon Magsaysay Award:

    1. Vinoba Bhave (1958)
    2. Mother Teresa (1962)
    3. Kamaladevi Chattopadhyay (1966)
    4. Satyajit Ray (1967)
    5. Mahasweta Devi (1997)
    6. Arvind Kejriwal (2006)
    7. Anshu Gupta of Goonj (2015)
    8. Bezwada Wilson, human rights activist (2016)
    9. Ravish Kumar, journalist (2019)

    Significance of the Award

    • The Ramon Magsaysay Award symbolizes a deep commitment to altruism and service, acknowledging outstanding contributions that make a positive impact on society.
    • It is a reminder that individuals and organizations can effect transformative change through their selfless efforts.
  • Supreme Court Ruling on ‘Self-Respect’ Marriages

    Central Idea

    • The recent Supreme Court ruling on ‘self-respect’ marriages under Section 7(A) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 has clarified the legal standing of these marriages.
    • The court’s decision has significant implications for the validity and recognition of such unions, particularly in the state of Tamil Nadu.

    Self-respect Marriages

    • Amendment: The Hindu Marriage (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Act, 1967 introduced Section 7-A into the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, applicable solely in Tamil Nadu.
    • Recognition of ‘Self-Respect’ Marriages: Section 7-A recognizes and legalizes ‘self-respect’ or ‘suyamariyathai’ marriages, allowing them to be solemnized without the need for traditional rituals or priests.
    • Ceremony Description: Such marriages are performed in the presence of relatives, friends, or other individuals, with couples declaring each other as spouses in a language understood by them. Exchange of garlands, rings, or tying a ‘thali’ (mangal sutra) is required. Registration remains obligatory.

    Legal Controversy

    • Madras High Court Ruling (2014): A 2014 Madras High Court ruling declared marriages solemnized by advocates as invalid, asserting that ‘self-respect’ marriages must not be secretive and should be celebrated publicly.
    • Current Supreme Court Ruling: The recent Supreme Court ruling, passed by Justices S Ravindra Bhat and Arvind Kumar, overruled the 2014 Madras High Court decision.

    Supreme Court’s Interpretation and Decision

    • The Supreme Court clarified that there is no blanket ban on advocates solemnizing ‘self-respect’ marriages under Section 7(A) of the Hindu Marriage Act.
    • The court held that ‘self-respect’ marriages can indeed be solemnized and recognized, and the 2014 Madras High Court ruling was set aside.
    • The ruling was delivered in response to a petition filed by Ilavarasan, who sought recognition of his ‘self-respect’ marriage and the release of his wife from her parents’ custody.
    • The Supreme Court’s decision is based on the interpretation of Section 7(A) and its application in the context of ‘self-respect’ marriages.

    Precedents and Past Rulings

    • In the case of Nagalingam vs. Sivagami (2001), the Supreme Court had already recognized the validity of ‘self-respect’ marriages under Section 7(A) of the Hindu Marriage Act.
    • The court emphasized that the presence of a priest is not obligatory for a valid marriage, and parties can enter into a marriage with the participation of relatives, friends, or other individuals.

    Conclusion

    • The recent Supreme Court ruling has resolved the ambiguity surrounding the legality of ‘self-respect’ marriages solemnized by advocates under Section 7(A) of the Hindu Marriage Act.
    • By overturning the previous Madras High Court ruling, the Supreme Court has clarified the validity and recognition of such marriages, ensuring that ‘self-respect’ marriages can be solemnized without the need for traditional rituals or priests in Tamil Nadu.
  • Evolution of Madras to Chennai: Tracing its Historical Transition

    madras chennai

    Central Idea

    • Madras Day celebrated on August 22, commemorates the foundation day of the city of Madras, now known as Chennai.

    The Birth of Madras

    • 1639: The East India Company (EIC) purchased the town of Madrasapatnam on August 22, 1639, laying the foundation for the modern-day city of Chennai.
    • British Presence: The EIC established trading posts and fortified settlements along the eastern and western coasts, leading to the emergence of Madras as a crucial hub.

    Transition from Madras to Chennai

    • British Rule: The region remained under British rule until India gained independence in 1947, with both the state and city referred to as Madras.
    • 1969: The state was officially renamed Tamil Nadu, and in 1996, Madras transformed into Chennai as a nod to its historical roots.

    Origins and Significance of Madrasapatnam

    • Origins of the Name: The origin of the name “Madras” remains debated, with theories suggesting connections to local fishermen, churches, and the term “pattinam” (town on the coast).
    • Pre-British History: Madrasapatnam had a history shaped by various rulers, including the Pallavas and Cholas, before the British arrival.

    Purchase and Founding of Madrasapatnam

    • Damarla Venkatapathy Nayak: Under his influence, the English were granted a piece of land between the Cooum River and the Egmore River in 1639, where Fort St. George was established.
    • Chennapatanam: The city around Fort St. George was named Chennapatanam, honoring Chennappa Nayak, which later inspired the name “Chennai.”

    Urban Growth and Development

    • Growth of the City: Over the centuries, Chennai evolved from Fort St. George and the Black and White towns into a significant urban center.
    • Institutionalization: Under Governor Elihi Yale, a mayor and Corporation were established, and areas like Egmore and Tondiarpet were acquired.

    Evolution to Tamil Nadu and Chennai

    • Post-Independence Era: After British rule ended, Madras province became Madras State.
    • Demand for Change: Various demands to rename the state as Tamil Nadu gained traction, with K P Sankaralinganar’s protest in 1956 being a pivotal moment.
    • Name Change: The renaming to Tamil Nadu was approved by Parliament in 1968 and came into effect in 1969.
    • Chennai’s Transition: Chennai’s renaming from Madras in 1996 was part of a broader trend to shed colonial influences, though British influence on these names’ evolution cannot be denied.

    Continuing Identity

    • The transformation of Madras to Chennai is not just a change in nomenclature, but a reflection of the dynamic interplay between historical heritage, regional identity, and post-colonial aspirations.
    • The city’s evolution stands as a testament to the diverse threads that weave India’s urban tapestry.
  • Sculptures shed light on ancient Mylara Cult

    mylara

    Central Idea

    The recent discovery of two sculptures in the Basrur region near Kundapura, Udupi (Karnataka), has brought to light the existence of the ancient Mylara cult in the coastal area.

    What is the news?

    • A remarkable sculpture, discovered in a well at Basrur, showcases a royal hero seated on a horse, wielding a sword and a bowl in his right and left hands, respectively.
    • Notably, this sculpture lacks the depiction of Mylaladevi on the horse’s back.

    About Mylara Cult

    • Mylara, a revered folk deity, is believed to be a divine incarnation of Lord Shiva.
    • Known by various names such as Mailara, Khandoba, Khanderao, and Khandnatha, this deity holds a diverse range of titles that highlight its multifaceted nature.
    • Its origins can be traced back to the 12th century Shaivite tradition, associated with the revered Lingayat saint and philosopher Siddharama, aka. Siddharameshwara or Siddhalinga.
    • The influence of the Mylara cult spans across the southern regions of India, encompassing Karnataka, Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, and Tamil Nadu.

    Historical Significance

    • Basrur was a thriving trading hub during the Medieval period, bustling with trading guilds like Uhayadesi and Nanadesi.
    • These guilds actively participated in trade, making Basrur a pivotal center for various cults and cultural exchange.
    • The Mylara cult, known for its prominence in the Deccan region, flourished in Basrur as well.
  • Ajnala Massacre of 1857 and its Rediscovery

    ajnala

    Central Idea

    • A recent collaborative effort of professional geneticists has resulted in a scientific confirmation of the Ajnala massacre – an event lost to history for 165 years.
    • This project, marked by emotional intensity and rigorous analysis, brought long-lost victims to light through molecular and isotope data.

    Ajnala Massacre

    • Buried Tragedy: 282 soldiers of the 26th Native Bengal Infantry Regiment met a brutal fate during the 1857 uprising, drowned in a well by the British East India Company.
    • Discovery of Location: Cooper’s book provided clues that helped locate the 1857 Kallianwala Martyrs’ Well beneath the Gurdwara Singh Sabha in Ajnala.
    • Chance Encounter: In 2003, historian Surinder Kochhar found a reference to ‘Ajnala’ in a discarded book titled “Crisis in Punjab” by Frederick Henry Cooper.
    • Massacre Rediscovered: Kochhar’s research led to the revelation of the Ajnala Massacre, a grim incident hidden for over 157 years.

    Excavation and Revelation

    • Unveiling the Remains: The well was excavated in 2014, exposing the skeletal remains of the soldiers.
    • Gruesome Discovery:  During the 1857 Sepoy mutiny, many Indian soldiers revolted against the British. Around 500 revolted at Mian Mir Cantonment in Lahore.
    • Evading execution: They swam across the Ravi River to reach the town of Ajnala, now in Amritsar district. Of them, 218 were killed by British soldiers at Dadian Sofian village near Ajnala.
    • Dumped into a well: The remaining 282 were stuffed in a small room, where many died of asphyxiation. The rest were shot dead and their bodies were thrown into a well, which was later named “Kalianwala Khu” and “Shaheedan da Khu”.

    Verification and Acknowledgment

    • Scientific Verification: DNA-based evidence confirmed that the remains belonged to soldiers of the 26th Native Bengal Infantry regiment.
    • Historical Importance: The Ajnala Massacre adds to the narrative of the 1857 Indian uprising against the British East India Company’s oppression.

    Conclusion

    • The Ajnala Massacre underscores the often-overlooked brutalities of the 1857 Indian uprising.
    • The lack of acknowledgement and memorials can be attributed to the government’s hesitance to address uncomfortable aspects of history.
  • Last survivors of Piripkura tribe found

    piripkura

    Central Idea

    • Deep within the Amazon rainforest, the story of Tamandua Piripkura unfolds, embodying the struggle of Indigenous people.
    • This man is one of the last three survivors of the Piripkura people.

    Who are the Piripkura?

    • The Piripkura tribe is a small and isolated indigenous group in Brazil.
    • They are known for their extreme isolation and limited contact with the outside world.
    • They have intentionally avoided contact with mainstream society and have maintained their traditional way of life for generations.
    • The Piripkura territory is located in the state of Mato Grosso, Brazil.
    • Their land lies within the Amazon rainforest, an area that is rich in biodiversity and crucial for the ecological balance of the region.

    Their dwindling population

    • The Piripkura tribe is estimated to consist of only 3 individuals.
    • Exact population figures are difficult to determine due to their isolation and the challenges associated with conducting a comprehensive census.
    • They face numerous challenges to their survival, including threats from illegal logging, mining, and land encroachment.
  • Megalithic Hat Stones unearthed in Nagaparamba

    megalithic

    Central Idea

    • Recent archaeological excavations in Tirunaya near Nagaparamba (Kerala) have brought to light a collection of hemispherical laterite stones known as hat stones or Thoppikkallu in Malayalam.

    Nagaparamba Megalithic Treasure

    • Thoppikkallu: Hat stones, referred to as Thoppikkallu in Malayalam, served as lids for burial urns during the megalithic era, offering a unique glimpse into burial practices.
    • Cultural Insights: The discoveries may provide valuable insights into the life and culture of the ancient inhabitants of the area, dating back more than 2,000 years.

    Unraveling the Mystery of Megaliths

    • Megalithic Structures: Megaliths were constructed as either burial sites or commemorative memorials, creating a distinctive landscape of archaeological significance.
    • Burial Remains: Examples of burial megaliths include dolmenoid cists, cairn circles, and capstones, each with its unique design and purpose.
    • Non-Sepulchral Megaliths: Non-burial megaliths, such as menhirs, hold a different purpose and significance.
    • Historical Context: The majority of Indian megaliths are attributed to the Iron Age, spanning from 1500 BC to 500 BC.
    • Regional Concentration: These intriguing structures are concentrated in states like Maharashtra, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, and Telangana.
  • Kashmir Issue: Why India went to the UN

    kashmir un

    Central Idea

    • The intricate tale of Kashmir’s “special status” has been a source of enduring conflict and turmoil within India and its neighbouring Pakistan.
    • Unravelling the events that led to rolling in of the UN in the Kashmir dispute, requires delving into verified historical facts.

    Kashmir: Birth of a Princely State

    • Origins: The princely state of Jammu and Kashmir emerged in 1846 when the British sold Kashmir to Gulab Singh, the Dogra jagirdar of Jammu, after the first Anglo-Sikh War.
    • Hari Singh’s Heritage: Maharaja Hari Singh, the ruler during India’s independence, was Gulab Singh’s descendant and envisioned an independent and neutral Kashmir.

    Dilemma of Accession

    • Independence Aspiration: Hari Singh aspired for Kashmir’s independence post-British rule, with a vision of a “Switzerland of the East.”
    • Viceroy’s Visit: Viceroy Lord Louis Mountbatten suggested Hari Singh’s accession to either India or Pakistan, but the state wanted to remain independent.
    • Gurdaspur’s Significance: The Radcliffe Boundary Commission’s decision on Gurdaspur was pivotal. The district’s inclusion in India secured a practical route for Kashmir’s potential accession.

    The Turning Point

    • Infiltration and Conflict: Infiltrators crossed over from Pakistan in October 1947, advancing swiftly. The identity of the infiltrators and their motivation remains disputed between India and Pakistan.
    • Pakistani Motivation: Pakistan claims the raiders acted independently, avenging atrocities against Muslims in India, while India asserts their involvement was orchestrated.
    • Jinnah’s Knowledge: Opinions diverge on whether Jinnah was informed about the infiltrators’ plan, with conflicting accounts of his awareness.

    Imperative of Accession

    • Hari Singh’s Request: Hari Singh requested military aid from India in response to the infiltrations, leading to India’s intervention.
    • Instrument of Accession: VP Menon brought the Instrument of Accession from Hari Singh, formalizing the state’s accession to India.

    Plebiscite and the UN Involvement

    • Mountbatten’s Stance: Mountbatten’s recommendation to involve the UN stemmed from his pessimism about bilateral negotiations between India and Pakistan.
    • UN Involvement: India took the Kashmir issue to the UN in 1948, seeking intervention to resolve the conflict. The framing of the issue as the “India-Pakistan question” was seen as a symbolic defeat for India.
    • Stance of World Powers: US and UK’s inclination toward Pakistan, in part due to geopolitical considerations, influenced the UN’s approach to the issue.

    Why did India go to the UN?

    • International Attention: India sought global attention and legitimacy by involving the UN in the Kashmir conflict.
    • Bilateral Stalemate: Unsuccessful bilateral negotiations pushed India to explore UN mediation.
    • Mountbatten’s Advice: Lord Mountbatten’s pessimism about the India-Pakistan agreement led to UN recommendation.
    • Symbolic Significance: Framing the issue at the UN highlighted its international nature.
    • Legitimacy and Process: UN involvement provided a structured platform for presenting arguments.
    • Conflict Avoidance: UN mediation aimed to prevent further conflict escalation in the region.

    Post-UN Scenario

    • Plebiscite Debate: India and Pakistan both agreed on the need for a plebiscite, but differing circumstances delayed its execution.
    • India’s Hardened Stand: As Pakistan aligned with the US, Nehru’s stance against a plebiscite intensified, fearing bias due to Sheikh Abdullah’s inclination towards India.
    • Integration with India: Jammu and Kashmir participated in India’s democratic processes, and Article 370, granting the region “special status,” was incorporated into the Indian Constitution.

    Conclusion

    • The complex history of Kashmir’s “special status” remains a subject of fervent debate, with deeply entrenched narratives on both sides.
    • It is within this intricate framework that the ongoing discussions and negotiations surrounding Kashmir’s future continue to unfold.
  • Madan Lal Dhingra and his Contributions

    madanlal dhingra madan lal

    Central Idea

    • On the 114th anniversary of his execution, a memorial is being formally inaugurated in honour of Madan Lal Dhingra.

    Who was Madan Lal Dhingra?

    • Early Life: Born on September 18, 1883, in an affluent family in Amritsar, Dhingra’s father was a staunch British loyalist, working as a chief medical officer.
    • Shift towards Nationalism: Dhingra’s exposure to the nationalist movement in Lahore during his studies ignited his patriotism.
    • Socio-Economic Concerns: Driven by a sense of justice and concern for India’s impoverished masses, Dhingra’s patriotism extended to socio-economic issues.
    • Expulsion and Resilience: Expelled from college for protesting against the use of British-imported cloth, Dhingra’s defiance marked his commitment to the cause.

    Involvement in Revolutionary Circles

    • Contact with Leaders: Dhingra connected with prominent figures like Vinayak Damodar Savarkar and Shyamji Krishna Varma, active in London’s revolutionary circles.
    • India House: Dhingra frequented India House, a hub for revolutionary Indian nationalism founded by Shyamji Krishna Varma, further igniting his revolutionary spirit.
    • Abhinav Bharat Mandal: Dhingra joined Abhinav Bharat Mandal founded by Vinayak Savarkar, where he refined his plan to assassinate Curzon Wyllie.

    Assassination of Curzon Wyllie

    • Curzon Wyllie’s Profile: Curzon Wyllie was a British Indian officer and intelligence officer known for collecting information on revolutionaries.
    • The Assassination: On July 1, 1909, Dhingra attended an event where Curzon Wyllie was present. Dhingra fired five shots, fatally hitting both Curzon Wyllie and a doctor who tried to intervene.
    • Dhingra’s Justification: During his trial, Dhingra argued that if fighting Germans was patriotic for an Englishman, fighting the British was even more justifiable for him.

    Legacy and Memorial

    • Execution and Burial: Dhingra was found guilty, executed on August 17, 1909, and buried in London. His remains were brought to India in 1976.
    • Struggle for a Memorial: A memorial in Dhingra’s name has been a long-standing demand. The efforts culminated in the formal inauguration of the memorial on the 114th anniversary of his execution.
    • Memorial Inauguration: The memorial was inaugurated by Governor Banwari Lal Purohit on August 17, 2023, in Amritsar’s Golbagh area.
    • Memorial’s Significance: The memorial stands as a tribute to Dhingra’s sacrifice and his role in the fight for India’s freedom.