💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Subject: Indian Society

  • The ‘domestic sphere’ in a new India

    Introduction

    Women in India continue to bear a disproportionate burden within the “domestic sphere,” both through unpaid household labour and through systemic silence around violence inside the home. Even as the government projects slogans like “nari shakti” and “women-led development,” the stark realities of dowry deaths, marital rape, unequal division of work, and undervaluation of women’s unpaid labour reveal deep contradictions. The recent Time Use Survey (TUS) 2024 and other official data bring to light these inequities, while political narratives attempt to glorify them as cultural strengths.

    Why in the News?

    The debate on the “domestic sphere” resurfaced after a controversial statement in August 2025 by RSS chief, who urged families to have at least three children for the “survival of civilisation.” This comment, reducing women to reproduction machines, stands in sharp contrast to the silence of ruling elites on domestic violence, dowry deaths (7,000 annually between 2017–2022), and marital rape. Simultaneously, the TUS 2024 exposed glaring gender disparities in unpaid work: women spend 7 hours daily in domestic services versus men’s 26 minutes. Despite this, the government’s framing celebrated men’s 15 minutes of caregiving as proof of “Indian family values.” This dissonance makes the issue urgent and deeply political.

    Women and Violence Within Homes

    1. Dowry deaths: An average of 7,000 women annually (2017–2022) have died in dowry-related violence, totalling 35,000 lives lost.
    2. Domestic violence: NFHS-5 revealed 30% women reported intimate partner violence, but only 14% lodged police complaints.
    3. Silence of leadership: While majoritarian rhetoric aggressively targets “love jihad,” it remains mute on intra-community domestic crimes, revealing selective morality.

    Historical and Contemporary Debates on Marriage and Gender Rights

    1. Ambedkar vs. orthodoxy: Ambedkar’s Hindu Code Bills sought divorce rights and caste-free marriages; opposed fiercely by conservative forces.
    2. Institution of marriage: Current opposition to criminalising marital rape reflects a continuity of Manusmriti-inspired ideals of sacramental marriage.
    3. Honour crimes: Cultural pressures still compel women to “adjust” in violent marriages, sustaining patriarchal structures.

    Time Use Survey 2024 – Striking Findings

    1. Employment gap: Only 25% of women (15–59 yrs) in employment-related work, compared to 75% men, with women working fewer hours.
    2. Unpaid domestic work: 93% of women spend 7 hours daily; 70% of men do none.
    3. Care work: 41% of women vs. 21% of men engage in unpaid caregiving; men average barely 16 minutes daily.
    4. Total working hours: Women overall work longer hours than men but get less leisure, sleep, and nutrition time.

    Government Narrative vs. Reality

    1. Official glorification: PIB (Feb 25, 2025) framed caregiving as reflecting the “Indian social fabric,” overlooking systemic gender exploitation.
    2. Policy translation: Anganwadi, mid-day meal, and ASHA workers, essentially extending domestic roles into the public sphere, are classified as “volunteers” with honorariums, not wages.
    3. Undervaluation: SBI 2023 study estimated ₹22.5 lakh crore annually (7% of GDP) as the value of women’s unpaid work, which subsidises male wages by reducing subsistence costs.

    Towards an Alternative Approach

    1. Violence-free homes: Stronger social and legal frameworks against domestic violence and marital rape.
    2. Equal right to work: Recognition of men and women as equal primary workers with equal wages.
    3. Public provisioning: State-backed universal childcare, elderly care, quality health and education.
    4. Cultural reform: Move from “adjustment” to shared responsibility in domestic work.
    5. Recognition for scheme workers: Anganwadi, ASHA, mid-day meal staff to receive minimum wages and benefits as government employees.

    Conclusion

    The “domestic sphere” is not a private matter but a deeply political one, shaping both India’s democracy and economy. Unless women’s unpaid work, safety within homes, and dignity are recognised, slogans of empowerment will remain hollow. True nari shakti lies not in numerical glorification of caregiving, but in building a society where women’s labour, both paid and unpaid, receives justice.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2019] “Empowering women is the key to control population growth”. Discuss.

    Linkage: Empowerment of women through education, health access, and economic participation is directly correlated with declining fertility rates, as seen in states like Kerala and Tamil Nadu.

    When women exercise agency over reproductive choices, population growth transitions from being a demographic challenge to a managed outcome.

    Thus, population stabilisation in India is less about coercive policies and more about gender justice and empowerment-driven development.

  • Ranking Pitfalls: India Rankings (2025) based on NIRF

    Introduction

    India’s higher education system is one of the largest in the world, and since 2016, the National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) has aimed to provide a structured evaluation of institutions. With participation expanding from 3,565 institutions in its inception year to 14,163 in 2025, and categories rising from four to seventeen, the NIRF has created a sense of competition and accountability. However, critical flaws remain: skewed weightage for subjective parameters, inadequate measurement of inclusivity, and overemphasis on reputational factors. These shortcomings risk reducing the exercise into a branding tool rather than a driver of equity and quality in higher education.

    Why is NIRF in the News?

    India Rankings 2025 has once again been dominated by legacy public institutions, underscoring persistent inequalities in India’s higher education landscape. Despite its expanded coverage, the framework continues to rely on flawed methodologies, including subjective peer perception and incomplete outreach and inclusivity parameters. Of particular concern is the neglect of socio-economically disadvantaged groups and students with disabilities in the inclusivity metric. The stakes are high: without reform, NIRF risks entrenching elitism and doing little to democratise access to quality education.

    Is NIRF making higher education more equitable?

    1. Outreach and Inclusivity (OI): Currently limited to regional and gender diversity while omitting socio-economic disadvantage and disability.
    2. Troubling trends: Only JNU and AIIMS, Delhi scored above 70 in OI among the top 10, exposing the marginalisation of weaker sections.
    3. Reservation policies: Central institutions still fail to adequately fill OBC, SC, and ST vacancies, undermining affirmative action.

    Are the ranking parameters robust and fair?

    1. Five key parameters: Teaching & resources (30%), research (30%), graduation outcomes (20%), outreach & inclusivity (10%), peer perception (10%).
    2. Peer perception flaw: Criticised by Education Minister; reputation-based, subjective, and often biased against state-run or suburban institutions.
    3. Self-declared data: Heavy reliance risks manipulation; false submissions remain unpunished.
    4. Bibliometric dependence: While verifiable, this excludes non-English and socially relevant research output.

    What challenges persist in India’s higher education system?

    1. Regional imbalance: Few top-quality institutions outside metropolitan hubs.
    2. Faculty shortage: Outside the top 100 institutions, a dearth of PhD-qualified teachers continues.
    3. Weak research culture: 58% of management institutions reported zero research publications.
    4. Mentorship gap: Legacy institutions rarely mentor emerging universities.

    How can NIRF evolve beyond rankings?

    1. Policy tool, not ritual: Insights must inform reforms instead of being an annual exercise.
    2. Stronger inclusivity metrics: Incorporating socio-economic and disability parameters alongside gender and region.
    3. Accountability: Penalising institutions submitting false data.
    4. Capacity building: Encouraging collaboration between established and upcoming institutions.
    5. Affirmative action: Monitoring recruitment policies and enforcing reservations in faculty hiring.

    Conclusion

    The NIRF has created awareness about institutional performance and expanded its scope significantly. Yet, unless it addresses fundamental flaws, especially inclusivity, fairness in assessment, and accountability, it risks becoming a branding exercise. For India’s higher education system to truly progress, rankings must serve as instruments of reform, driving equity, excellence, and social justice.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2015] The quality of higher education in India requires major improvement to make it internationally competitive. Do you think that the entry of foreign educational institutions would help improve the quality of technical and higher education in the country? Discuss.

    Linkage: The NIRF 2025 rankings expose gaps in research output, inclusivity, and global competitiveness of Indian institutions. While reforms in ranking parameters can drive internal improvements, the entry of foreign universities may create healthy competition and raise benchmarks. Thus, the PYQ directly connects with debates on how India can achieve globally competitive higher education through both domestic reforms and external participation.

  • How much is spent on children’s education in India

    Introduction

    India has long struggled with gender inequities in education. Despite government efforts like Beti Bachao, Beti Padhao and steady progress in enrolment, where girls now form 48% of the school population and even surpass men in gross enrolment ratios in higher education, financial investment by families continues to tilt in favor of boys. The 80th round of the National Sample Survey (Comprehensive Modular Survey on Education) reveals that boys consistently receive higher expenditure allocations across school stages and states, highlighting deep-rooted social biases in household decision-making.

    Significance of the recent NSS report

    1. New evidence: The 2024 survey covered 52,085 households and data for 57,742 students, making it one of the most comprehensive datasets on education expenditure.
    2. Contradiction with enrolment success: Despite progress in closing gender enrolment gaps, the spending patterns show that financial priorities still favor boys.
    3. Striking gap: In urban India, families spend ₹2,791 less per girl compared to boys, while in rural India, boys get 18% more spent on them.
    4. Long-term concern: Such expenditure biases translate into inequities in learning outcomes, employability, and overall empowerment.

    Gender patterns in household spending on education

    1. All stages of schooling: Per-student expenditure on girls is consistently lower than boys from pre-primary to higher secondary.
    2. Rural-urban divide: Rural families spend ₹1,373 more on boys; urban families spend 30% more on boys by higher secondary level.
    3. Course fees: Families pay on average 21.5% more in fees for boys.

    Private vs government schooling:

    1. 58.4% of girls are in government schools.
    2. 34% of boys access private unaided schools compared to 29.5% of girls.
    3. Tuition classes: While enrollment in coaching is similar (26% girls vs 27.8% boys), expenditure differs, by higher secondary, families spend 22% more on tuition for boys.

    State-level variations in educational expenditure

    1. Delhi, MP, Rajasthan, Punjab: More than 10 percentage points gender gap in private school enrolment.
    2. Tamil Nadu and Kerala: Gender parity—boys and girls access government and private schools almost equally.
    3. Northeast States: Reverse trend—more girls enrolled in private schools.
    4. Telangana, Tamil Nadu, West Bengal: Families spend vastly more on boys at higher secondary level.
      • Example: In Tamil Nadu, families spend ₹35,973 on boys vs ₹19,412 on girls.
    5. Kerala, Himachal Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh: More spending on girls at higher secondary, partly due to safety-related transport costs.

    Gender gap in private coaching expenditure

    1. Himachal Pradesh: Families spend ₹9,813 per boy vs ₹1,550 per girl on higher secondary tuition.
    2. Bihar, Jharkhand, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu: Also show significant tuition expenditure gaps.
    3. Implication: Coaching is seen as a gateway to competitive exams and better career prospects—girls being left out deepens structural disadvantages.

    Broader implications for gender equality

    1. Hidden inequality: Enrolment parity does not mean equity in quality or investment.
    2. Future workforce impact: Lower spending on girls limits their human capital development and perpetuates the gender pay gap.
    3. Policy blind spots: Subsidies and scholarships exist, but social norms continue to undervalue daughters’ education.

    Way Forward

    Bridging the gender gap in educational expenditure requires a multi-pronged approach that addresses not just affordability but also deep-rooted social norms.

    1. Strengthening targeted subsidies: Expansion of schemes like Beti Bachao, Beti Padhao, free bicycles for girls, and conditional cash transfers for secondary and higher education can encourage families to invest equally in daughters.
    2. Equalising access to quality education: Improving the quality of government schools and providing digital learning resources will reduce the need for costly private schooling and tuitions, thereby narrowing gendered disparities.
    3. Awareness and behavioural change: Community-level campaigns must challenge patriarchal mindsets that undervalue girls’ education. Civil society and self-help groups can be leveraged to reshape family-level decision-making.
    4. Transport and safety interventions: Ensuring safe and affordable transport for girls, particularly in higher secondary education, will address a key cost component that discourages investment.
    5. Monitoring and accountability: Data from National Sample Survey and Unified District Information System for Education (UDISE+) should be used to regularly monitor gendered expenditure gaps and inform evidence-based policies.
    6. Integrating ethics and social responsibility: Education policies must go hand in hand with fostering a sense of justice, fairness, and equal opportunity, so that families see daughters as equal bearers of human capital.

    Conclusion

    The NSS findings show that while India has moved forward in closing the gender gap in enrolment, it still struggles with a silent financial discrimination in household educational spending. Unless families start valuing daughters’ education equally, not just in words but also in investment, true gender equality in education will remain elusive. Corrective measures through policy nudges, financial incentives, and awareness campaigns are essential to bridge this invisible divide.

    Value Addition

    Key Concepts

    1. Gender Parity Index (GPI): Ratio of female-to-male values in education indicators; India has achieved near-parity in enrolment but lags in investment equity.
    2. Human Capital Theory: Education as an investment leading to productivity and growth; unequal spending weakens women’s contribution to the economy.
    3. Intersectionality: Gender bias in expenditure intersects with class, caste, and rural-urban divides, amplifying inequalities.

    Data and Reports

    1. National Sample Survey (2024): Reveals consistent gaps in household expenditure on girls’ education across stages and regions.
    2. World Economic Forum Gender Gap Report (2024): India slipped in rankings, with education a major drag despite enrolment progress.
    3. ASER Report (Annual Status of Education Report): Points to quality issues in rural schools, often affecting girls disproportionately.
    4. UNESCO (Global Education Monitoring Report, 2023): Highlights that globally, girls are more likely to be excluded from secondary and higher education due to cost factors.

    Government Policies and Schemes

    1. National Education Policy (NEP) 2020: Emphasises inclusive, equitable education and gender-sensitive curricula.
    2. Beti Bachao, Beti Padhao (2015): Social mobilisation for improving girls’ survival, protection, and education.
    3. National Scheme of Incentives to Girls for Secondary Education (NSIGSE): Financial support to reduce dropouts.
    4. Kasturba Gandhi Balika Vidyalaya (KGBV): Residential schooling for disadvantaged girls in Classes 6–12.

    Comparative International Experience

    1. Bangladesh: Successful in reducing gender disparity through stipend schemes for girls, free textbooks, and subsidies—leading to higher female enrolment in secondary education.
    2. Nordic Countries (Sweden, Norway, Finland): Achieved near-complete gender equity in education by ensuring free schooling, universal childcare, and strong social security systems that reduce household bias.
    3. Rwanda: Introduced Gender-Responsive Budgeting—allocating funds specifically to address gender gaps in education, which India can emulate.

    Quotes (Useful for Essay/Ethics/GS answers)

    1. “If you educate a man you educate an individual, but if you educate a woman you educate a family.” — Charles M. Cooper
    2. “Investment in girls’ education is not charity, it is the smartest investment a country can make.” — UN Secretary-General António Guterres

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2022] The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 remains inadequate in promoting incentive-based system for children’s education without generating awareness about the importance of schooling. Analyse.

    Linkage: The NSS 80th round shows families spend 18–30% more on boys than girls, privileging them in private schools and coaching despite RTE’s universal access. This proves that incentive-based provisions under the RTE Act remain inadequate without tackling deep-rooted gender norms. Hence, awareness generation, gender-responsive budgeting, and social mobilisation are essential complements to legal entitlements.

  • In news: Apatani Tribe

    Why in the News?

    The facial tattoos and wooden nose plugs of Apatani women in Arunachal Pradesh, banned in the 1970s, now survive only among older generations, giving them anthropological importance.

    About Apatani Tribe:

    • Overview: A Scheduled Tribe (ST) concentrated in Ziro Valley, Lower Subansiri district, Arunachal Pradesh.
    • Language: Part of the Tani linguistic group, speaking a dialect of the Tibeto-Burman family.
    • Belief System: Paganistic faith worshipping the Sun (Ayo Danyii) and Moon (Atoh Piilo).
    • Festivals: Dree (prayers for harvest and prosperity), Myoko (friendship bonds), along with Yapung and Murung.
    • Global Recognition: Ziro Valley noted for traditional ecological knowledge, proposed as a UNESCO World Heritage Site.

    Unique Features:

    • Distinct Identity: Women traditionally had facial tattoos and wooden nose plugs; banned since the 1970s, seen only among older women today.
    • Sustainable Farming: Practise integrated rice-fish farming on terraced fields, growing rice varieties like Mipya, Emoh, Emeo along with fish (Ngihi).
    • Weaving Tradition: Women weave on a loin loom (Chichin), producing fabrics with geometric and zig-zag designs, dyed with natural extracts.
    • Bamboo Culture: Bamboo central to daily life, crafts, and rituals, symbolising ecological harmony.
    • Community Systems: Maintain sustainable social forestry and village institutions for conservation and cultural continuity.
    [UPSC 2014] Consider the following pairs:

    Tribe : State

    1. Limboo (Limbu) : Sikkim

    2. Karbi : Himachal Pradesh

    3. Dongaria Kondh : Odisha

    4. Bonda : Tamil Nadu

    Which of the above pairs are correctly matched?

    Options: (a) 1 and 3 only* (b) 2 and 4 only (c) 1, 3 and 4 only (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4

     

  • Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups (PVTGs)

    Why in the News?

    The Ministry of Tribal Affairs (MoTA) has written to the Registrar General and Census Commissioner of India (RGI) to enumerate PVTGs separately in Census 2027.

    Who are the PVTGs?

    • Overview: Sub-category of Scheduled Tribes (STs) marked by stagnant or declining population, geographical isolation, pre-agrarian subsistence, economic backwardness, and very low literacy.
    • Origin: Concept recommended by the Dhebar Commission (1960–61) noting inequalities among STs.
    • Historical Evolution:
      • Fourth Five-Year Plan (1969–74): creation of Primitive Tribal Groups (PTGs).
      • Fifth Five-Year Plan (1974–79): 52 groups identified.
      • 2006: PTGs renamed as PVTGs.
    • Present Status: 75 PVTGs recognized across 18 states and 1 UT (Andaman & Nicobar Islands).
    • Characteristics: Small numbers, remote habitation, pre-agricultural practices, hunting and gathering reliance, and in some cases zero or negative population growth.

    Enumeration and Population Estimates:

    • 2011 Census Status: PVTGs were NOT separately enumerated, counted under the broader ST category.
    • Special Cases:
      • 2011 Census: Baigas counted separately, while Abujh Marias, Bharias, Hill Korbas, Kamars subsumed under STs.
      • 2013: Abujh Maria and Hill Korba explicitly added to Chhattisgarh’s ST list via legislation.
    • Recent Estimates: 2023 PM JANMAN survey estimated the population at 47.5 lakh.
      • Madhya Pradesh: 13.22 lakh (highest).
      • Maharashtra: about 6.7 lakh.
      • Andhra Pradesh: about 5.18 lakh.
    • Largest and Smallest:
      • Largest: Baiga of Madhya Pradesh with about 4.14 lakh.
      • Smallest: Sentinelese of Andaman & Nicobar Islands with just 15 individuals.
    • Micro Groups: In 2011, 13 PVTGs had populations below 1,000 including Jarawa, Onge, Sentinelese, Shompen (A&N Islands), Raji (Uttarakhand), Kota (Tamil Nadu), Birhor (Odisha/Bihar), Kamar (Madhya Pradesh), and others.
    [UPSC 2019] Consider the following statements about Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups (PVTGs) in India:

    1. PVTGs reside in 18 States and one Union Territory.

    2. A stagnant or declining population is one of the criteria for determining PVTG status.

    3. There are 95 PVTGs officially notified in the country so far.

    4. Irular and Konda Reddi tribes are included in the list of PVTGs.

    Which of the statements given above are correct?

    Options: (a) 1, 2 and 3 (b) 2, 3 and 4 (c) 1, 2 and 4* (d) 1, 3 and 4

     

  • Should reservations exceed the 50% cap?

    Introduction

    Reservations have always stood at the crossroads of social justice and equality of opportunity in India. While Articles 15 and 16 of the Constitution of India empower the state to address historical discrimination, the judicially imposed 50% cap has often clashed with demands for greater inclusivity. Recent developments, from Maharashtra’s acceptance of Maratha demands to calls for caste census and creamy layer reform, have amplified questions on whether the reservation system remains equitable, representative, and sustainable.

    The Current Moment of Reckoning

    The debate has reached a critical juncture because:

    1. Political promises like Bihar opposition leader Tejashwi Yadav’s proposal for 85% reservations directly challenge the 50% ceiling.
    2. Judicial scrutiny continues, with the Supreme Court questioning whether creamy layer exclusion should extend to SCs and STs.
    3. Empirical concerns such as 40–50% of reserved seats remaining unfilled, and the Rohini Commission’s revelation that 97% of OBC benefits are cornered by 25% castes, highlight structural inequities.

    This combination of political assertion, judicial intervention, and social critique makes the issue highly consequential.

    Articles 15 and 16: The constitutional basis of equality and reservation

    1. Equality mandate: Article 15 guarantees equality in state actions, including education; Article 16 guarantees equality in public employment.
    2. Special provisions: Both allow the state to make reservations for OBCs, SCs, and STs.
    3. Present levels: At the central level, reservations stand at 59.5% (OBC – 27%, SC – 15%, ST – 7.5%, EWS – 10%).

    Judicial rulings on reservation and equality

    1. Balaji vs State of Mysore (1962): Reservations must be “within reasonable limits” and capped at 50%; seen as upholding formal equality.
    2. N.M. Thomas (1975): Saw reservations as a continuation of equality of opportunity (substantive equality), but gave no ruling on the cap.
    3. Indra Sawhney (1992): Upheld 27% OBC quota, reaffirmed 50% ceiling, and introduced creamy layer exclusion for OBCs.
    4. Janhit Abhiyan (2022): Validated 10% EWS quota; held that 50% limit applies only to backward classes.
    5. Davinder Singh (2024): Suggested considering creamy layer exclusion for SCs and STs.

    Challenges to the 50% ceiling on reservations

    1. Population logic: Backward classes form a larger share than reflected in current quotas; caste census demanded to get exact numbers.
    2. Unfilled vacancies: 40–50% of reserved seats for OBC/SC/ST remain unfilled at the central level.
    3. Sub-caste concentration: Rohini Commission showed extreme skew in OBC benefits—about 1,000 communities have zero representation.

    The problem of concentration of reservation benefits

    1. OBCs: 97% benefits go to ~25% sub-castes.
    2. SCs/STs: Similar skew; absence of creamy layer exclusion means relatively better-off sub-castes capture opportunities.
    3. Policy vacuum: Despite judicial nudges, the Centre reaffirmed in August 2024 that creamy layer does not apply to SC/ST.

    The way forward for India’s reservation system

    1. Balancing equality: Increasing quota to 85% may violate equality of opportunity, but substantive equality demands better targeting.
    2. Caste census 2027: Could offer empirical basis for restructured reservation.
    3. Sub-categorisation: Rohini Commission’s recommendations need urgent implementation.
    4. Two-tier system: Priority for the most marginalised within SC/STs could prevent elite capture.
    5. Beyond reservation: Skill development and private sector opportunities are crucial, given shrinking public jobs.

    Conclusion

    India’s reservation policy is at an inflection point. Expanding quotas without reforming their structure risks perpetuating inequity within communities. A nuanced approach, backed by caste census data, sub-categorisation, and skill-building, can ensure that reservations remain a tool for empowerment rather than a political slogan. The challenge lies in balancing constitutional guarantees of equality with the imperative of social justice in a diverse democracy.

    PYQ Relevance:

    [UPSC 2019] Performance of welfare schemes that are implemented for vulnerable sections is not so effective due to absence of their awareness and active involvement at all stages of policy process, Discuss.

    Linkage: The 2019 question highlights how welfare schemes for vulnerable sections often fail due to lack of awareness and skewed access. The same issue is reflected in India’s reservation policy: despite constitutional backing, 40–50% of reserved seats remain unfilled, and the Rohini Commission revealed that 97% of OBC benefits are cornered by just 25% sub-castes, leaving nearly 1,000 communities with no representation at all. This shows that affirmative action, much like welfare schemes, risks becoming ineffective unless equitable distribution, sub-categorisation, awareness generation, and active participation of the most marginalised are ensured.

  • In news: Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan

    Why in the News?

    The Supreme Court intervened after Tamil Nadu faced ₹3,000+ crore reimbursements to private schools for economically disadvantaged students’ admissions, as the Centre declined to share costs under Samagra Shiksha.

    About Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan:

    • Launch & Integration: Started in 2018 (by then Ministry of HRD), integrating Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA), Rashtriya Madhyamik Shiksha Abhiyan (RMSA), and Teacher Education (TE) into one holistic programme.
    • Benchmark Feature: Treats schooling as a continuous system from pre-primary to Class XII (ages 4–18), removing silos.
    • Funding Pattern: A Centrally Sponsored Scheme (CSS) with Centre–State sharing (60:40, 90:10 for NE/hilly states), implemented via a single State Implementation Society (SIS).
    • Policy Alignment: Aligned with NEP 2020 and UN SDG-4 (quality education).
    • Coverage: 1.16 million schools, 156+ million students, 5.7 million teachers across government & aided institutions.
    • Upgraded Phase: Samagra Shiksha 2.0 (2021–26) with focus on digital education, vocational training, FLN, and inclusion.

    Key Features of the Scheme:

    • Unified Structure: One umbrella for pre-primary to Class XII, ensuring coherent planning.
    • Teachers & Technology:
      • Continuous teacher training via SCERTs, DIETs, NISHTHA, SWAYAM.
      • Digital initiatives: DIKSHA, Operation Digital Board, ICT labs, smart classrooms, AI-based learning tools.
    • Foundational Literacy & Numeracy: NIPUN Bharat Mission (ages 3–9) for universal reading & numeracy.
    • Vocational & Skill Education: Subjects like coding, robotics, financial literacy, AI with 1000+ training centres (from Class VI).
    • Direct Benefit Transfers (DBT): Uniforms, textbooks, transport allowance directly credited via IT platforms.
    • Holistic Development: Integration of sports, physical education, self-defence, soft skills under Khelo India.
    • Funding Scale: Allocation crossed ₹41,000 crore (2025); nationwide coverage till March 2026 under Samagra Shiksha 2.0.
    [UPSC 2017] What is the aim of the programme ‘Unnat Bharat Abhiyan’?

    Options: (a) Achieving 100% literacy by promoting collaboration between voluntary organizations and government’s education system and local communities.

    (b) Connecting institutions of higher education with local communities to address development challenges through appropriate technologies. *

    (c) Strengthening India’s scientific research institutions in order to make India a scientific and technological Power.

    (d) Developing human capital by allocating special funds for health-care and education of rural and urban poor, and organizing skill development programmes and vocational training for them.

     

  • Detoxifying India’s entrance examination system

    Introduction

    Entrance examinations in India were envisioned as a filter for talent, ensuring merit-based access to elite institutions. However, over time, they have morphed into an industry-driven rat race. From ₹7 lakh coaching fees to student suicides, the costs are both economic and human. With growing disparities in access, an illusory notion of meritocracy, and mounting psychological toll, rethinking admissions is not a choice but a necessity.

    The Coaching Crisis and Its Toll

    1. Massive Aspirant Pool: Over 15 lakh students appear for JEE alone, making coaching almost unavoidable.
    2. High Costs: Coaching fees of ₹6–7 lakh for two years price out poor students.
    3. Early Sacrifices: Students as young as 14 years study Irodov & Krotov (beyond B.Tech level), sacrificing holistic growth.
    4. Mental Health Crisis: Rising stress, depression, alienation; some governments now regulate coaching centres.
    5. Core Issue: The examination system itself is flawed, creating overqualified candidates and distorted merit.

    Why Meritocracy is an Illusion

    1. Tiny Differences, Big Stakes: Distinguishing between 91% vs 97% in Class 12, or 99.9 percentile in JEE is unreasonable.
    2. Adequate Benchmark Exists: A 70–80% score in Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics is sufficient for B.Tech readiness.
    3. False Hierarchies: Overemphasis on marginal score differences creates elitism and exclusion.
    4. Privilege Bias: Wealthier families access top coaching, creating an illusory meritocracy.
    5. Philosophical Insight: Harvard’s Michael Sandel critiques meritocratic obsession, proposing lotteries for elite admissions.

    Global Inspirations for Reform

    1. Dutch Lottery System:
      • Introduced in 1972, reinstated in 2023 for medical school.
      • Weighted lottery: minimum eligibility required, higher grades = higher chances.
      • Promotes diversity, fairness, and reduced pressure.
    2. China’s “Double Reduction Policy” (2021):
      • Banned for-profit coaching overnight.
      • Reduced financial burden and youth stress.
      • Addressed unchecked growth of the coaching industry.

    Proposed Solutions for India

    1. Lottery-based Allocation:
      • Threshold of 80% in PCM for eligibility.
      • Weighted lottery with categories (90%+, 80–90%): A weighted lottery with categories (90%+, 80–90%) means all eligible students enter a lottery, but those with higher marks get proportionally better chances of selection.
      • Reservations integrated (gender, rural, region).
    2. Rural Empowerment: 50% IIT seats for rural govt school students to promote social mobility.
    3. Coaching Reform: Ban/nationalise coaching, provide free online lectures & study material.
    4. Diversity & Integration: Student exchange between IITs to break hierarchies.
    5. Faculty transfers to standardise academic quality.

    Conclusion

    India’s choice is stark: continue a toxic rat race that scars its brightest minds, or embrace a fair, equitable system that nurtures youth. Scrapping or reforming entrance exams through lotteries, trust in Class 12 boards, rural reservations, and coaching reforms can detoxify the system. The aim must not only be producing engineers and doctors but ensuring the emotional, social, and moral growth of India’s future citizens.

    Value Addition

    Committee Recommendations & Policy Inputs

    • Radhakrishnan Commission (1948–49) – Stressed on reducing rote-based entrance exams and aligning admissions with broader educational goals.
    • Kothari Commission (1964–66) – Recommended a common school system to minimise disparities in access, echoing today’s concerns about coaching and inequality.
    • National Knowledge Commission (2005) – Suggested multiple modes of testing and reducing dependence on a single high-stakes exam.
    • Yashpal Committee (2009) – Criticised the “overburden of entrance exams” and highlighted the need for a more holistic, less mechanical admission process.
    • NEP 2020 – Calls for a holistic and flexible education system, moving away from rote-based, high-pressure exams towards fairer assessment models.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2024] What are the aims and objectives of the recently passed and enforced, The Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024? Whether University/State Education Board examinations, too, are covered under the Act?

    Linkage: The Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024 seeks to curb frauds like paper leaks and impersonation to restore exam credibility. The article extends this concern by highlighting systemic unfairness — coaching dependence, stress, and privilege-driven access. Together, they underline that ensuring fairness in exams requires not just legal safeguards but also structural reforms in India’s entrance system.

  • [29th August 2025] The Hindu Op-ed: India’s demographic dividend as a time bomb

    Mentor’s Comment

    India’s celebrated demographic dividend, once viewed as a sure path to prosperity, is at risk of turning into a demographic time bomb. The article highlights how an outdated education system, misaligned curricula, lack of skilling, and the AI-driven disruption are threatening the employability of millions of young Indians. With over 800 million citizens below 35, the stakes are immense: India’s future growth, social stability, and global aspirations hinge on whether this youth bulge is transformed into an asset or left to fester as a liability.

    Introduction

    Demographic dividend refers to the economic growth potential that arises when a country has a larger share of its population in the working-age group compared to dependents. It is essentially the window of opportunity where youth can drive productivity, innovation, and national prosperity. India today stands at such a pivotal moment, with more than half of its population below the age of 35. This unprecedented youth bulge offers a chance to accelerate growth, but whether it becomes a dividend or a disaster depends entirely on how well the country equips its people with education, skills, and employability.

    The scale of India’s demographic challenge

    1. Youth bulge: Over 800 million people under 35, one of the world’s largest youth populations.
    2. Graduate glut: India produces millions of graduates annually, but many remain underemployed or unemployable.
    3. Engineering crisis: 40–50% of engineering graduates in the last decade were not placed in jobs.
    4. Employability gap: According to Mercer-Mettl (2025), only 43% of graduates are job-ready.

    The impact of Artificial Intelligence on jobs and employability

    1. Automation threat: McKinsey projects 70% of jobs in India could be impacted by automation by 2030.
    2. Task replacement: Nearly 30% of current job tasks will be automated globally.
    3. Job churn: World Economic Forum (WEF) predicts 170 million new jobs by 2030, but 92 million displaced in the same period.
    4. Urgency: India’s curriculum runs on 3-year cycles, too slow compared to fast-moving technology disruptions.

    The roots of the education–employment mismatch in schools

    1. Career ignorance: 93% of students (Classes 8–12) are aware of only 7 traditional careers (doctor, engineer, lawyer, teacher).
    2. Career options: The modern economy offers 20,000+ career paths.
    3. Guidance gap: Only 7% of students receive formal career guidance.
    4. Wrong fit: 65% of high school graduates pursue degrees not aligned with their aptitude or market demand.

    The shortcomings of India’s skilling missions

    1. Skill India shortfall: Aimed to train 400 million individuals by 2022, but fell short.
    2. Fragmented approach: Policies such as Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana (PMKVY), Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Kendras (PMKK), Jan Shikshan Sansthan (JSS), Pradhan Mantri Yuva Yojana (PMYY), Skills Acquisition and Knowledge Awareness for Livelihood Promotion (SANKALP), and the Prime Minister’s Internship Scheme have been launched, but they often function in silos without effective integration.
    3. Funding without impact: Large-scale spending has not yielded industry-ready graduates.
    4. Need of the hour: Cohesive, industry-aligned national skilling strategy.

    The risks of neglecting the demographic crisis

    1. Economic setback: Risk of educated but unemployable workforce undermining India’s growth.
    2. Social unrest: Historical precedent in the Mandal protests of 1990, where youth frustration erupted violently.
    3. Paradox at scale: As Lant Pritchett noted in Where Has All the Education Gone?, mere schooling without employability worsens the crisis.
    4. Civilizational risk: The crisis is not just about jobs, but about the social contract between state and youth.

    Conclusion

    India stands at a crossroads. The very youth once seen as its greatest strength may become its Achilles’ heel if the education–employment gap remains unaddressed. The AI revolution makes this transition even more urgent. With the right mix of foresight, reforms, and collaboration between government, private sector, and academia, India can convert its youth bulge into a global competitive advantage. The clock is ticking, the dividend must be harnessed before it explodes into a time bomb.

    PYQ Linkage

    [UPSC 2016] “Demographic Dividend in India will remain only theoretical unless our manpower becomes more educated, aware, skilled and creative.” What measures have been taken by the government to enhance the capacity of our population to be more productive and employable?

    Linkage: The question emphasizes that India’s demographic dividend will remain theoretical without real improvements in education, awareness, skills, and creativity. This connects with the fact that, despite schemes like Skill India Mission, PMKVY, NEP 2020 and SANKALP, a large share of graduates remain unemployable — with only 43% job-ready and 40–50% of engineering graduates jobless — underscoring the urgent need for aligning skilling with industry demands.

  • UDISE+ Report, 2025

    Why in the News?

    The latest round of Unified District Information System for Education Plus (UDISE+) data was released by the Ministry of Education (MoE).

    About UDISE+

    • Launch: Introduced in 2018–19 as an upgraded version of UDISE (2012–13).
    • Purpose: Collects and monitors school-level data across India.
    • Coverage: Tracks enrolment, dropout rates, teachers, infrastructure, and gender indicators.
    • Design: Built to speed up data entry, reduce errors, improve verification, and enhance data quality.
    • Policy Role: Functions as a key tool for planning, monitoring, and implementing education reforms.
    • Scope: Covers schools at all levels – foundational, preparatory, middle, and secondary.

    Key Highlights of the UDISE+ 2025 Report:

    • Teachers: Number of teachers crossed 1 crore (1,01,22,420) in 2024–25, a 6.7% rise from 2022–23.
    • Pupil–Teacher Ratio (PTR): Improved to 10 (foundational), 13 (preparatory), 17 (middle), and 21 (secondary), well below NEP’s 1:30 recommendation.
    • Dropout Rates: Fell sharply to 2.3% (preparatory), 3.5% (middle), 8.2% (secondary) in 2024–25, compared to 8.7%, 8.1%, 13.8% respectively in 2022–23.
    • Retention Rates: Reached 98.9% (foundational), 92.4% (preparatory), 82.8% (middle), 47.2% (secondary).
    • Gross Enrolment Ratio (GER): Rose to 90.3% (middle) and 68.5% (secondary).
    • Transition Rates: Increased to 98.6% (foundational → preparatory), 92.2% (preparatory → middle), 86.6% (middle → secondary).
    • Zero-Enrolment & Single Teacher Schools: Single-teacher schools reduced to 1,04,125; zero-enrolment schools dropped to 7,993 (38% decline).
    • Infrastructure: 64.7% schools with computer access, 63.5% with internet, 93.6% with electricity, 99.3% with drinking water, 97.3% with girls’ toilets, 96.2% with boys’ toilets. 95.9% with handwashing, 83% with playgrounds, 89.5% with libraries, 54.9% with ramps/handrails, 29.4% with rainwater harvesting.
    • Gender Representation: Girls’ enrolment rose to 48.3%. Female teachers increased to 54.2% of the workforce.
    [UPSC 2018] Consider the following statements:

    1. As per the Right to Education (RTE) Act, to be eligible for appointment as a teacher in a State, a person would be required to possess the minimum qualification laid down by the concerned State Council of Teacher Education.

    2. As per the RTE Act, for teaching primary classes, a candidate is required to pass a Teacher Eligibility Test conducted in accordance with the National Council of Teacher Education guidelines.

    3. In India, more than 90% of teacher education institutions are directly under the State Governments

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    Options: (a) 1 and 2 (b) 2 only * (c) 1 and 3 (d) 3 only