💥Crack UPSC In 1st Attempt | Admission Open | Ultimate Assessment Program 2027/2028

Subject: Internal Security

  • DRI Seizes 32 kg Methamphetamine in North East

    Why in the News?

    The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) has seized 32 kg methamphetamine tablets worth ₹32 crore in two separate operations in Assam and Tripura, exposing the continued use of the Indo–Myanmar route for drug trafficking. Three persons have been arrested under the NDPS Act, 1985.

    About Methamphetamine  

    • A synthetic psychostimulant
    • Known as Ya Ba / Speed pills in Southeast Asia
    • Highly addictive
    • Controlled under Schedule of NDPS Act, 1985

    What is Hydroponic Weed?

    • Marijuana grown in nutrient-rich water systems, not soil
    • Higher potency due to controlled conditions
    • New smuggling trend: carried by air passengers into NE India

    NDPS Act, 1985  

    • Regulates narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances
    • Provides for seizure, arrests, forfeiture
    • Commercial quantity offences: 10–20 years imprisonment
    • Empowered agencies: DRI, NCB, Customs, State Police, BSF, Assam Rifles
    Q: India’s proximity to two of the world’s biggest illicit opium-growing states has enhanced her internal security concerns. Explain the linkages between drug trafficking and other illicit activities such as gunrunning, money laundering and human trafficking. What countermeasures should be taken to prevent the same? (UPSC 2018) 
  • Government plans unification of port security regulations- sovereign entity to oversee private ports while CISF will regulate 80 ports

    Why In The News?

    The government has designated CISF as the security regulator for 250+ seaports to strengthen coastal security.

    1) New Security Framework:

    • Sovereign Entity at Seaports: Government to deploy CISF as a sovereign security force at private cargo-handling ports for a uniform security system.
    • Initial Coverage: CISF to regulate 80 major export-import seaports for access control, cargo screening, and seafront patrolling.
    • Phase-wise Expansion: Remaining 170 seaports will be brought under CISF in stages.
    • ISPS Code Role: CISF designated as the Recognised Security Organisation under the International Ship and Port Facility Security Code.

    2)Framework for Seaport Security in India:

    • International Ship and Port Facility Security (ISPS) Code:
      India’s port security system aligns with the mandatory global ISPS Code, introduced after 9/11 to protect ships and port facilities from terrorism and other maritime threats.
    • Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) as Security Regulator:
      The Government of India has recently designated the CISF as the Recognised Security Organisation (RSO) for ports, marking a major reform to strengthen and standardise port security across the country.

    3)Challenges to Port Security:

    • Non-Standardised Security Framework:
      • Security at many non-major ports historically lacked uniformity and expert oversight.
      • Heavy dependence on private security agencies or local police resulted in inconsistent standards.
    • Transnational & Non-Traditional Threats:
      • Maritime terrorism remains a persistent risk.
      • Smuggling and drug trafficking, with ports often used for large narcotics consignments.
      • Cyberattacks targeting port IT systems and critical infrastructure.
    • Infrastructure & Manpower Gaps:
      • Difficulty in ensuring uniform, high-quality security infrastructure across 250+ ports.
      • Significant manpower shortages: CISF requires 800-1,000 personnel per major seaport and has requested 10,000 additional personnel for initial deployment.
    • Coastal Vulnerabilities:
      • Large stretches of coastline remain open, poorly monitored, or unguarded.
      • Absence of a sovereign security force at private ports has created long-standing security gaps.
    • Identified Gaps in Official Reviews:
      • Coastal security flagged as a priority for discussion at the Director Generals of Police (DGP) Conference, attended by the Prime Minister.
      • The 2023 MHA guidelines highlighted major deficiencies and recommended comprehensive improvements.

    4) Committee Recommendations:

    • Committee Findings: A 2024 Joint Committee (CISF + Director General Shipping) conducted gap analysis and proposed corrective measures.
    • Hybrid Security Model: Core security functions to be handled by CISF, while State Police/private agencies manage non-core duties.

    5)About CISF:

    • Overview: CISF is a Central Armed Police Force under the Ministry of Home Affairs, headquartered in New Delhi; motto: “Protection and Security.”
    • Establishment:
      • Formed in 1969 through the CISF Act, 1968 with three battalions.
      • Declared an Armed Force of the Union after the 1983 amendment.
      • Expanded into a multi-skilled force with 188,000+ personnel.
      • Provides security to 359 establishments nationwide.
    • Organisation Structure:
      • Headed by a Director-General (IPS), assisted by an Additional DG.
      • Divided into seven sectors: Airport, North, North-East, East, West, South, Training.
      • Has a dedicated Fire Service Wing.
    • Functions:
      • Secures critical infrastructure: nuclear and space facilities, airports, seaports, power plants.
      • Protects Delhi Metro, Parliament Complex, heritage monuments, and major government buildings.
      • Responsible for airport security since 2000 (post IC-814 hijacking).
      • Provides VIP security to designated protectees.
      • Trained in disaster management (floods, earthquakes, cyclones).
      • Operates India’s largest Fire Protection Service among CAPFs.
      • Post-2008 Mumbai attacks, expanded to private sector security.
      • Functions as a compensatory cost force, billing clients for services.
    [UPSC 2023] With reference to Home Guards, consider the following statements:

    1. Home Guards are raised under the Home Guards Act and Rules of the Central Government.

    2. The role of the Home Guards is to serve as an auxiliary force to the police in maintenance of internal security.

    3. To prevent infiltration on the international border/coastal areas, the Border Wing Home Guards Battalions have been raised in some States.

    How many of the above statements are correct?

    Options: (a) Only one (b) Only two* (c) All three (d) None

     

  • IAF’s Tejas jet crashes during demo flight at Dubai Air Show, pilot killed

    Why In The News?

    An Indian Air Force Tejas fighter jet crashed during the Dubai Air Show, killing Wing Commander Namansh Syal, after spiralling out of control and igniting on impact at Al Maktoum International Airport.

    1)Tejas Mk1A: 

    • About: The Tejas Mk1A is an upgraded variant of India’s Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) Tejas, developed by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL).
    • Purpose: This version is aimed to enhance operational and combat capabilities, survivability and maintainability over the baseline Mk1.
    • Capabilities:
      • Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar integration.
      • Electronic Warfare Suite (EWS) – radar‑warning and self‑protection jamming.
      • Upgraded Flight Control Computer (DFCC Mk1A) for better maneuverability and stability.
      • Missile compatibility- Beyond Visual Range (BVR) missiles, Air-to-Air and Air-to-Ground missiles and Advanced Short Range Air-to-Air Missiles (ASRAAM).
      • Planned integration of Combined Interrogator and Transponder (CIT), Software Defined Radio (SDR) and Operating Data Link (ODL) with existing onboard avionics.

    2) LCA Tejas:

    • About: The LCA Tejas programme, initiated by the Government of India in 1984, aimed to replace the ageing MiG-21 fighter jets. The programme is managed by the Aeronautical Development Agency (ADA).
    • Features:
      • Lightest, smallest, and tailless multi-role supersonic fighter in its class.
      • Capable of carrying a variety of air-to-air, air-to-surface, and precision-guided weapons.
      • Maximum payload capacity of 4000 kg.
      • Maximum speed: Mach 1.8.
      • Range: 3,000 km.
    • Variants of Tejas:
      • Tejas Trainer: 2-seater operational conversion trainer for training air force pilots.
      • LCA Navy: Twin- and single-seat carrier-capable for the Indian Navy.
      • LCA Tejas Navy MK2: This is phase 2 of the LCA Navy variant.
      • LCA Tejas Mk-1A: This is an improvement over the LCA Tejas Mk1 with a higher thrust engine.

    3)Fifth Generation Fighter Jets:

    • About:
      • Combat Role: Designed for highly contested combat zones with advanced air and ground threats.
      • Stealth & Speed: Feature stealth technology and supercruise capability.
      • Key Advantages:
        • Multi-spectral low-observable design
        • Enhanced self-protection
        • Radar jamming capabilities
        • Fully integrated avionics systems
      • Global Operators:
        • Russia: Sukhoi Su-57
        • China: Chengdu J-20
        • United States: F-35 series
    • Need for India:
      • Squadron Strength: IAF has ~30 squadrons, below the sanctioned 42.
      • Ageing Fleet:
        • MiG-21
        • MiG-29
        • Jaguar
        • Mirage 2000
        • All to be phased out by mid-next decade.
      • Airpower Gap:
        • China: 3,304 aircraft
        • India: 2,296 aircraft
        • Pakistan: 1,434 aircraft
      • Strategic Need: Strengthen air defences against China and Pakistan and increase defence self-reliance.
      • Indigenous Development:
        • Developing AMCA
        • Five prototypes planned
        • Joint effort by ADA, HAL, and private industry
      • Strategic Positioning: 5G fighters would place India alongside the US, Russia, and China.
    [UPSC 2024] Question: Consider the following aircraft:

    1. Rafael

    2. MiG-29

    3. Tejas MK-1

    How many of the above are considered fifth generation fighter aircraft?

    Options: (a) Only one (b) Only two (c) All three (d) None*

     

  • The threat of digital tradecraft in terrorism

    Introduction

    The blast near Delhi’s Red Fort on November 10, killing 15 and injuring over 30, exposed the operational use of encrypted digital platforms, dead-drop communication, and modular terror cells. The investigation demonstrates a transition from traditional networks to digitally shielded ecosystems, reducing visibility for intelligence agencies and constraining surveillance outcomes.

    The new face of terror: What has the investigation revealed?

    1. Encrypted Communication: Enables concealed coordination, protects identity layers, and reduces interception by routing messages through shielded platforms.
    2. Digital Dead-Drops: Facilitates asynchronous message exchange without direct contact, ensuring operational secrecy and reducing surveillance exposure.
    3. Compartmentalised Cells: Strengthens deniability by separating roles across modules led by three individuals linked to medical and academic institutions.
    4. Behavioural Masking: Utilises familiar vehicles and repetitive low-risk movement patterns to support covert reconnaissance without triggering alerts.
    5. Enhanced IED Architecture: Ensures higher lethality through layered mechanisms and precise triggering processes.

    Distinctive Features of This Incident

    1. Multi-Layer Encryption: Reduces actionable intelligence, constrains lawful interception, and delays early detection of operational chatter.
    2. Surveillance-Resistant Tools: Utilises VPNs, spoofed identifiers, and encrypted messaging apps, enabling secure command dissemination.
    3. Hybrid Planning: Integrates digital coordination with physical site visits, ensuring real-time situational assessment without exposing handlers.
    4. Decentralised Decision Structures: Prevents traceability by shifting from hierarchical control to remote guidance via anonymised digital nodes.

    Why are modern counterterrorism frameworks struggling?

    Constraints on Counterterrorism Architecture

    1. Limited Penetration of Encrypted Platforms: Restricts information extraction, narrows visibility over operational trails, and weakens evidence chains.
    2. Diminished HUMINT Opportunities: Reduces physical touchpoints and complicates informant-based intelligence generation.
    3. Fragmented Global Cooperation: Slows data sharing when platforms are hosted outside domestic jurisdiction, weakening investigation pace.
    4. Technological Mismatch: Creates capability gaps as terror networks adopt advanced masking, encryption, and anonymisation faster than security upgrades.

    Operational Impact of Digital Tradecraft

    1. End-to-end encryption (E2EE) Platforms: Shields logistics, finances, and movement plans, enabling uninterrupted operational execution.
    2. Remote Radicalisation and Supervision: Facilitates cross-border ideological influence and guidance without physical linkages.
    3. Metadata Evasion: Minimises digital footprints by exploiting layered encryption and controlled online presence.
    4. Coordination Efficiency: Enhances planning speed and reduces command exposure by relying on decentralised digital frameworks.

    Required Strategic Adaptations

    1. Digital Forensics Expansion: Strengthens cryptographic analysis, behavioural modelling, and dark-web investigation capacity.
    2. Lawful Interception Reform: Establishes judicially supervised mechanisms enabling secure access to encrypted communication when mandated.
    3. Inter-Agency Data Fusion: Integrates intelligence, cyber cells, and police units on unified platforms to improve threat detection and response.
    4. Cyber Infrastructure Modernisation: Enhances surveillance technologies, metadata analytics, and predictive systems to match digital threat evolution.
    5. International Data Cooperation: Accelerates cross-border evidence sharing and improves alignment with global counterterrorism frameworks.

    Conclusion

    The Red Fort blast demonstrates a shift toward encrypted, decentralised, and digitally concealed terror ecosystems. The emerging landscape requires specialised digital forensics, integrated intelligence systems, and balanced legal frameworks to strengthen operational readiness. Counterterrorism capacities must evolve to address threats emerging from opaque digital environments rather than visible physical terrains alone.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2016] Use of Internet and social media by non-state actors for subversive activities is a major concern. How have these been misused in the recent past? Suggest effective guidelines to curb the above threat.

    Linkage: The misuse of Internet and social media by non-state actors remains a recurring internal security theme. The encrypted digital activity with respect to the recent The recent Red Fort blast make the issue current and significant. The topic continues to appear because communication networks are now central to modern security threats.

  • More than two decades later, there is light at the end of the Red Corridor

    INTRODUCTION

    Left-Wing Extremism (LWE) has historically affected large tribal hinterlands across central India. Recent field reports indicate a visible decline in Maoist hold, accompanied by expanding state presence, renewed market activity, and local confidence in security forces. The transformation represents a significant shift from earlier decades marked by fear, isolation, and violence.

    Why in the news?

    A major setback to Maoists occurred recently when top Andhra-Odisha border commander Madvi Hidma was killed in a security operation, followed by the elimination of seven more Maoists, including an explosives expert. These back-to-back encounters highlight the rapid weakening of LWE networks across the Red Corridor.

    Why is the region witnessing a visible shift in confidence?

    1. Reduced Fear: The article notes that locals now openly interact with security forces, signalling erosion of Maoist coercion.
    2. Increased Presence: Security deployment strengthened continuous area domination, reducing the probability of Maoist reprisals.
    3. Civilian Mobility: Market activity in evening hours increased, contrasting earlier periods when movement after dusk was restricted due to threats.
    4. Symbolic Change: Locals offering security personnel chai and sitting freely with them indicates behavioural trust, not forced compliance.

    What structural changes weakened Maoist dominance?

    1. Road Connectivity: New roads and bridges reduced forest isolation, weakening Maoist geographical advantage and enabling faster troop mobility.
    2. Communication Facilities: Mobile networks expanded surveillance, reduced Maoist anonymity, and enabled quicker civilian distress calls.
    3. Administrative Outreach: Frequent visits by district officials ensured service delivery and reduced ideological appeal.
    4. Disruption of Recruitment: Youth engagement in local markets, transport, and small businesses reduced Maoist manpower pipelines.

    How did security operations evolve on the ground?

    1. Stronghold Penetration: Forces entered areas earlier considered “liberated zones”, indicating territorial rollback.
    2. Integrated Command: Inter-state coordination between Chhattisgarh, Maharashtra, Telangana improved operational continuity.
    3. Sanitisation Efforts: Regular area domination patrols lowered the possibility of ambushes.
    4. Intelligence Support: Human intelligence from locals increased due to declining fear, enabling targeted strikes.

    What has changed in the population’s everyday life?

    1. Economic Activity: Markets extending late into evening reflect safety and disposable income circulation.
    2. Transport Revival: Locals travelling without escorts marks reduced threat perception.
    3. Women’s Movement: Increased participation by women in markets shows greater autonomy and reduced intimidation.
    4. Community Interaction: Openness to engage with forces signals normalisation of state-citizen interaction.

    Why has the Maoist strategy weakened?

    1. Loss of Terrain Control: Eroded forest sanctuaries limit guerrilla advantage.
    2. Depleted Cadres: Surrenders and casualties reduced leadership continuity.
    3. Ideological Attrition: Reduced resonance of Maoist messaging as development outreach substitutes grievances.
    4. Operational Fatigue: Continuous pressure limited long-duration planning, reducing capability for large-scale attacks.

    CONCLUSION

    The article highlights a decisive shift in the Red Corridor, where expanded state presence and growing public confidence have significantly reduced Maoist influence. The transition reflects a combination of operational consistency, improved connectivity, and changing local behaviour, collectively signalling a new phase in India’s long battle against Left-Wing Extremism.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2022] Naxalism is a social, economic and developmental issue manifesting as a violent internal security threat. Discuss the emerging issues and suggest a multilayered strategy to tackle the menace of Naxalism.

    Linkage: The PYQ matches the article’s focus on LWE decline driven by security consolidation and development outreach. It directly links to how improved roads, markets, and public confidence are weakening Naxalism.

  • Army sets up three new garrisons near the Siliguri Corridor

    Why in the News?

    India has set up three new Army garrisons at Dhubri, Kishanganj, and Chopra to secure the vulnerable eastern frontier and protect the Siliguri Corridor amid instability in Bangladesh and rising Chinese activity.

    Army sets up three new garrisons near the Siliguri Corridor

    About Siliguri Corridor:

    • Overview: A narrow land strip connecting mainland India to the Northeast, popularly called the Chicken Neck due to its thin, vulnerable shape.
    • Dimensions: Roughly 60 km long and 17–22 km wide, making it one of India’s most strategically sensitive corridors.
    • Location: Lies in northern West Bengal, bordered by Nepal (west), Bangladesh (south), Bhutan (north), with China’s Chumbi Valley close to the tri-junction.
    • Link to Northeast: The only land route for supplying all eight northeastern states, carrying road, rail, fuel, food and military logistics (except limited Bangladesh transit routes).
    • Strategic Sensitivity: Its narrowness and proximity to the India–China–Bhutan tri-junction make it a potential chokepoint in conflict scenarios.
    • Military Importance: Acts as the primary logistical artery for moving Indian Army troops and equipment toward Sikkim and Arunachal Pradesh, especially during LAC tensions.
    • Security Challenges: Surrounded by multiple international borders, making it prone to illegal immigration, smuggling, cross-border crime, and potential external military pressure.
    • Economic Significance: Key route for trade with Nepal and Bhutan, and supports tourism to Darjeeling, Sikkim and Bhutan.

    About the New Eastern Garrison Deployments:

    • Purpose: Developed to address rising security risks due to political changes in Bangladesh, demographic pressures along the border, and China’s increasing activity near the tri-junction.
    • Locations:
      1. Lachit Borphukan Military Station, Dhubri (Assam)
      2. Forward base, Kishanganj (Bihar)
      3. Forward base, Chopra (West Bengal)
    • Operational Role: Enables continuous surveillance, rapid troop movement, and strengthens defence preparedness across the India–Bangladesh frontier.
    • Local Support: Assam facilitated quick setup of the Dhubri station, named after Ahom general Lachit Borphukan, symbolising regional identity and military determination.

    Drivers Behind the Reinforcement:

    • Regime Change in Bangladesh: Expected shifts in border behaviour, cross-border movement, and potential security spillovers.
    • Illegal Immigration Concerns: Union Home Ministry has flagged demographic changes in border districts linked to cross-border inflow.
    • China’s Expanding Influence:
      • Accelerated LAC military build-up in Arunachal Pradesh.
      • Growing ties with Pakistan and Bangladesh, including a trilateral meet in Kunming, raising regional security concerns.
    • Regional Military Activity: India has conducted major exercises like Poorvi Prachand Prahar and IAF flying displays in Assam to signal operational readiness.
    • Pakistan–Bangladesh Engagements: Recent visit of a Pakistan Navy ship to Chattogram (first since 1971) has added a fresh strategic dimension to India’s eastern security planning.
  • Compound effect: On digital arrest scams

    Introduction

    The Supreme Court of India’s recent directive for a comprehensive probe into proliferating digital scams underscores the scale and sophistication of cyber fraud plaguing Indian citizens. The Court’s focus on “digital arrest” scams, where criminals impersonate law enforcement officials to extort money highlights a disturbing transformation in global cybercrime: industrial-scale scam operations embedded in Southeast Asian conflict zones.

    Why in the News

    For the first time, the Supreme Court has intervened directly to address the globalised architecture of digital scams targeting Indian citizens. These scams run from “scam compounds” in Myanmar, Cambodia, and other parts of Southeast Asia combine human trafficking, digital slavery, and organised crime. Thousands of Indians have fallen victim, some trafficked to operate scams, others defrauded online. The situation represents both a national security concern and a humanitarian crisis, demanding urgent multilateral action.

    Understanding the ‘Scam Compound’ Phenomenon

    1. Industrial-scale operations: Scam compounds operate from conflict-ridden or special economic zones in Myanmar, Cambodia, and Laos, exploiting weak governance.
    2. Cross-border architecture: These are not isolated crimes but coordinated, transnational enterprises involving militias, private entities, and local regimes.
    3. Digital slavery model: Trafficked individuals are forced, under threat and torture, to perpetrate scams such as “digital arrest,” “pig butchering,” and crypto investment frauds.
    4. State complicity: In Myanmar, regime-backed Border Guard Forces allegedly facilitate these compounds, converting scams into revenue streams for military operations.

    KK Park Cyber Scam Hub in Myanmar

    How the Digital Scam Network Operates

    1. Recruitment through deception: Victims are lured by fake job ads in cities like Bangkok, offering attractive salaries under visa-free entry regimes.
    2. Trafficking & confinement: Once recruited, they are trafficked into border regions controlled by ethnic militias in Myanmar and held captive in “digital sweatshops.”
    3. Coercive work environment: Workers face violence, sexual harassment, and torture if they fail to meet scam targets.
    4. Key scam types:
      1. “Digital arrest scams” impersonation of law enforcement to extort money.
      2. “Pig butchering scams” combining online romance and crypto fraud.
    5. Crypto laundering networks: Proceeds are funneled via money mules and institutions like Cambodia’s Huione Pay, then converted into cryptocurrency to evade tracing.

    Why Southeast Asia Became the Epicentre

    1. Conflict & weak governance: Myanmar’s post-2021 coup turmoil has enabled militia-run economies.
    2. Borderland lawlessness: Regions under Border Guard Forces function beyond formal state oversight.
    3. Economic desperation: Regional instability and poverty create fertile recruitment grounds.
    4. Regime complicity: Militias tax scam centres to fund armed operations, sustaining a vicious cycle of profit and repression.

    India’s Dual Crisis

    1. Forced scam labour: Thousands of Indian citizens trafficked and enslaved in these compounds.
    2. Domestic victimisation: Thousands more in India fall prey to online frauds orchestrated by these same captives.
    3. Diplomatic and enforcement challenge: Tackling both victim rescue abroad and fraud prevention at home requires synchronised national and international coordination.

    Policy Imperatives and India’s Way Forward

    1. Public awareness campaigns: The Reserve Bank of India and Union Ministries must amplify citizen education about emerging digital fraud patterns.
    2. Cybercrime infrastructure: Strengthening cyber policing, digital forensics, and cross-border data sharing frameworks.
    3. Regional cooperation: Collaborate with China, Thailand, Vietnam, and affected ASEAN nations to forge joint task forces.
    4. Diplomatic pressure: Use bilateral and multilateral diplomacy to pressurise Myanmar’s junta and Cambodia’s regime to dismantle scam hubs.
    5. Global recognition: Mobilise the United Nations to classify this crisis as a modern manifestation of slavery needing urgent international intervention.

    Conclusion

    The proliferation of scam compounds across Southeast Asia exposes the dark underbelly of the global digital economy where technology meets trafficking. For India, the challenge is dual: protect citizens from victimisation and rescue those coerced into perpetration. This crisis demands that India integrate cyber security, diplomacy, and human rights enforcement under one coordinated regional framework.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2021] Keeping in view India’s internal security, analyse the impact of cross-border cyber attacks. Also, discuss defensive measures against these sophisticated attacks.

    Linkage: This question directly relates to the rise of transnational scam compounds in Southeast Asia that exploit digital networks to target Indian citizens. It underscores the urgent need for coordinated international and domestic cyber defense frameworks.

  • Exercise MILAN, 2026

    Why in the News?

    India will host the International Fleet Review, Exercise MILAN- 2026, and the Indian Ocean Naval Symposium (IONS) Conclave of Chiefs together in Visakhapatnam from February 15–25, 2026.

    About Exercise MILAN:

    • Overview: Biennial multilateral naval exercise hosted by the Indian Navy to promote interoperability, maritime cooperation, and goodwill among friendly navies.
    • Origin: First conducted in 1995 under the Andaman and Nicobar Command with participation from Indonesia, Singapore, Sri Lanka, and Thailand.
    • Growth: Expanded over the years to include 40–55 participating nations, reflecting India’s growing maritime diplomacy under Act East Policy and SAGAR (Security and Growth for All in the Region) initiative.
    • Participation: The 2026 edition will see participation from over 50 navies, including the U.S., Russia, Japan, Australia, and ASEAN countries.
    • Venue: The 2026 edition will be hosted at Visakhapatnam under the Eastern Naval Command, marking the largest MILAN to date.
    • Structure: Conducted in two phases, a Harbour Phase (seminars, workshops, cultural exchanges, planning conferences) and a Sea Phase (joint operational exercises).
    • Sea Phase Activities: Includes anti-submarine warfare (ASW), air defence, maritime domain awareness (MDA), search and rescue (SAR), and complex fleet manoeuvres.
    • Strategic Significance: Strengthens regional maritime security, demonstrates India’s indigenous naval capabilities, and reinforces its role as a net security provider in the Indo-Pacific.

    Back2Basics: Indian Ocean Naval Symposium (IONS)

    • Overview: A voluntary, multilateral maritime cooperation initiative launched by the Indian Navy in 2008 to enhance regional maritime security and dialogue among littoral nations of the Indian Ocean Region (IOR).
    • Membership: Comprises 25 member states and 9 observer countries, spanning Africa, West Asia, South Asia, Southeast Asia, and Australia.
    • Objective: To promote maritime safety, security, capacity building, information sharing, and cooperation in Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief (HADR) operations.
    • Chairmanship: The chairmanship rotates biennially among member nations; India will assume the chair for 2025–2027.
    • Key Areas of Focus:
      • Enhancing maritime domain awareness (MDA) and information exchange.
      • Combating piracy, illegal fishing, human trafficking, and terrorism at sea.
      • Strengthening maritime connectivity and blue economy cooperation.
      • Coordinating disaster relief and search-and-rescue operations.

     

    [UPSC 2024] Which of the following statements about ‘Exercise Mitra Shakti-2023’ are correct?

    1. This was a joint military exercise between India and Bangladesh.

    2. It commenced in Aundh (Pune).

    3. Joint response during counter-terrorism operations was a goal of this operation.

    4. Indian Air Force was a part of this exercise.

    Select the answer using the code given below:

    Options: (a) 1, 2 and 3 (b) 1 and 4 (c) 1 and 4 (d) 2, 3 and 4*

     

  • KK Park Cyber Scam Hub in Myanmar

    Why in the News?

    Around 500 Indian nationals who escaped the KK Park cybercrime compound in Myawaddy township, southeastern Myanmar, are being rescued by the Government of India.

    KK Park Cyber Scam Hub in Myanmar

    About KK Park Cyber Scam Hub:

    • Location & Setting: Situated in Myawaddy township, Karen State, Myanmar, near the Thailand border; originally built (2019–2021) as a border trade zone, later transformed into a cybercrime and human trafficking hub.
    • Control & Operations: Managed by the Border Guard Force (BGF) under Saw Chit Thu, a junta-allied militia leader sanctioned by the U.S. Treasury.
    • Nature of Activities: Functions as a “scam city” employing thousands of trafficked workers for online fraud, crypto scams, and romance-investment schemes.
    • Human Trafficking: Victims are recruited via fake overseas job offers, then imprisoned, tortured, and forced to commit cybercrimes after passport confiscation.
    • Scale: At its peak, housed over 20,000 trafficked workers, generating billions annually through global online fraud networks.
    • Structure: Operated like a self-contained enclave with dormitories, shops, and armed security — preventing worker escape.

    Global Concern and UN Findings:

    • UN Reports:  Identified by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) and the Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime (GI-TOC) as part of a network of cyber-scam compounds spanning Myanmar, Cambodia, and the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Laos).
    • Economic Scale: The cyber-scam economy earns over USD 10 billion annually, victimising users in 110 countries.
    • Myanmar’s 2025 Raid: Seizure of 30 Starlink terminals was seen as a cosmetic crackdown, as ringleaders escaped beforehand.
    • UN Appeal: Calls for cross-border enforcement, crypto tracking, and victim rehabilitation, viewing scam hubs as a fusion of trafficking and transnational organised crime.

    How does it impact Indians?

    • Victimisation: India serves as both a source and target of such scams; hundreds trafficked to Myanmar and Cambodia under fake IT job offers.
    • Rescue Operations: Since 2022, over 1,600 Indians repatriated, including 500 from KK Park (2025); IAF rescued 283 stranded in Thailand earlier.
    • Cyber Threats: Rising crypto frauds, impersonation scams, and digital extortion targeting Indian citizens.
    • Government Response: EAM S. Jaishankar confirmed coordination for repatriation and stronger cyber-diplomacy engagement.
    • Policy Imperative: Highlights India’s need for international law enforcement cooperation, cybersecurity awareness, and anti-trafficking vigilance across Southeast Asia.
    [UPSC 2024] Consider the following statements:
    Statement-I: There is instability and worsening security situation in the Sahel region.
    Statement-II: There have been military takeovers/coups d’état in several countries of the Sahel region in the recent past.
    Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
    Options: (a) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I *
    (b) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
    (c) Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect
    (d) Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct

     

  • [pib] Exercise KONKAN-25

    Why in the News?

    Exercise KONKAN-25 has commenced off the western coast of India, marking two decades of India–UK maritime cooperation.

    About Exercise KONKAN:

    • Nature & Objective: Exercise KONKAN is an annual bilateral maritime exercise between the Indian Navy and the Royal Navy of the United Kingdom.
    • Objective: To strengthen interoperability, joint maritime operations, and mutual understanding.
    • Origin: Initiated in 2004, the exercise has expanded into a multi-domain naval engagement involving surface, sub-surface, and aerial warfare.
    • Venue Rotation: Conducted alternately in Indian and UK waters, it symbolises the long-standing India–UK strategic defence partnership.
    • Vision: It aligns with the India–UK Vision 2035, promoting free, open, and rules-based seas across the Indo-Pacific.

    Key Features:

    • Two-Phase Format:
      • Harbour Phase – Professional interactions, cross-deck visits, sports & cultural events, subject-matter expert exchanges, and working group meetings.
      • Sea Phase – Complex operational drills including anti-air, anti-surface, and anti-submarine warfare, flying operations, seamanship drills, and live-fire gunnery.
    • Major Participants (2025):
      • India – Carrier Battle Group led by INS Vikrant, supported by destroyers, frigates, submarines, and naval air assets.
      • United Kingdom – Carrier Strike Group 25 (CSG-25) led by HMS Prince of Wales, joined by allies Norway (HNoMS Roald Amundsen) and Japan (JS Akebono).
    • Special Highlight: First-ever carrier strike group collaboration between India and the UK, marking a new milestone in joint naval power projection.
    [UPSC 2024] Which of the following statements about ‘Exercise Mitra Shakti-2023’ are correct?

    1. This was a joint military exercise between India and Bangladesh.

    2. It commenced in Aundh (Pune).

    3. Joint response during counter-terrorism operations was a goal of this operation.

    4. Indian Air Force was a part of this exercise.

    Select the answer using the code given below:

    (a) 1, 2 and 3 (b) 1 and 4 (c) 1 and 4 (d) 2, 3 and 4*