💥Crack UPSC In 1st Attempt | Admission Open | Ultimate Assessment Program 2027/2028

Subject: Internal Security

  • Technology Perspective and Capability Roadmap (TPCR-2025)

    Why in the News?

    The Ministry of Defence has released the Technology Perspective and Capability Roadmap 2025 (TPCR-2025), a 15-year blueprint for military preparedness and modernization.

    About Technology Perspective and Capability Roadmap (TPCR-2025):

    • Overview: A strategic modernization blueprint released by the Ministry of Defence to guide India’s Armed Forces for the next 10–15 years.
    • Scope: Covers tri-services for multi-domain operations across land, sea, air, cyber, and space.
    • Industry Role: Provides clear requirements to defence industry, MSMEs, and start-ups to focus R&D, manufacturing, and innovation.
    • Policy Alignment: Linked to Atmanirbhar Bharat, reducing import dependence and strengthening indigenous production.
    • Objective: Ensure forces remain technologically competitive, prepared for emerging threats, and resilient in a dynamic security environment.

    Key Features of TPCR-2025:

    • Nuclear & CBRN Preparedness: Strengthening nuclear command systems, survivability infrastructure, radiation detection, decontamination units, unmanned CBRN (Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear) vehicles.
    • Drones & Unmanned Systems: Development of stealth drones (range 1,500 km, altitude 60,000 ft), AI-enabled loitering munitions, anti-drone EW bubbles.
    • Electronic & Cyber Warfare: Deployment of advanced jammers, EW payloads, info-dominance systems, and readiness for cyber and space warfare.
    • Service Modernization:
      • Army: New tanks, light tanks, UAV-launched PGMs, electromagnetic weapons.
      • Navy: New destroyers, corvettes, mine vessels, nuclear-powered warships, third aircraft carrier.
      • Air Force: Stratospheric airships, long-range cruise missiles, hardened PGMs.
    • Implementation: Regular industry–services consultations, engagement with MSMEs and start-ups, periodic updates.

    Significance:

    • Serves as a capability roadmap for long-term defence planning.
    • Strengthens domestic defence ecosystem.
    • Ensures future combat readiness in multi-domain operations.
    [UPSC 2020] In India, why are some nuclear reactors kept under “IAEA safeguards” while others are not?

    Options: (a) Some use uranium and others use thorium

    (b) Some use imported uranium and others use domestic supplies

    (c) Some are operated by foreign enterprises and others are operated by domestic enterprises

    (d) Some are State-owned and others are privately owned *

     

  • What is Free Movement Regime (FMR)?

    Why in the News?

    Ahead of PM Modi’s Manipur visit, United Naga Council (UNC) has announced a trade embargo from against the India–Myanmar border fence and the suspension of the Free Movement Regime (FMR).

    What is Free Movement Regime (FMR)?

    About the Free Movement Regime (FMR):

    • Overview: Introduced in the 1970s, FMR allowed residents within 16 km of the India–Myanmar border to travel freely up to 16 km across without visa requirements.
    • Border length: India–Myanmar border stretches 1,643 km across four states: Arunachal Pradesh (520 km), Nagaland (215 km), Manipur (398 km), Mizoram (510 km).
    • Purpose: To recognize ethnic, cultural, and familial ties of communities (Kuki, Naga, Mizo, etc.) living across the unfenced border.
    • Revision: Last revised in 2016 under the Act East Policy.
    • Suspension: On February 8, 2024, MHA formally announced its scrapping, citing:
      • Internal security risks.
      • Illegal immigration and demographic changes in NE states.
      • Cross-border drug trafficking and insurgency links.

    Stakeholder Perspectives:

    • Kuki groups: View FMR suspension and fencing as an attack on shared ethnic ties, even comparing it to the Berlin Wall. Recently reached an understanding with MHA negotiators.
    • Naga groups (UNC): Strongly opposed to border fencing and FMR suspension, claiming it undermines homeland, land rights, and identity. Announced a trade embargo in protest.
    • Meiteis (Valley population): Support suspension, arguing that FMR facilitated illegal migration, illicit drug trade, and aggravated ethnic tensions.
    • Government of India: Defends suspension on security and demographic grounds, while attempting to balance peace talks with tribal groups.
    [UPSC 2016] Consider the following statements:

    I. Assam shares a border with Bhutan and Bangladesh

    II. West Bengal shares a border with Bhutan and Nepal

    III. Mizoram shares a border with Bangladesh and Myanmar

    Which of the statements given above are correct?

    Options: (a) I, II and III * (b) I and II only (c) II and III only (d) I and III only

     

  • Immigration and Foreigners (Exemption) Order, 2025

    Why in the News?

    The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has issued the Immigration and Foreigners (Exemption) Order, 2025, notified under Section 33 of the Immigration and Foreigners Act, 2025.

    What is Immigration and Foreigners Act, 2025?

    • Enactment: Passed by Parliament, effective 1 Sept 2025.
    • Objective: Unifies scattered immigration laws into a single framework, balancing national security, demographic protection, humanitarian obligations, and economic openness.
    • Repeals: Passport (Entry into India) Act, 1920; Registration of Foreigners Act, 1939; Foreigners Act, 1946; Immigration (Carriers’ Liability) Act, 2000.
    • Key Provisions:
      • All foreigners must enter, stay, exit with valid passport & visa, unless exempted.
      • Digital system with biometrics, AI-based monitoring, and real-time agency coordination.
      • New visa categories: Skilled Talent, Startup, Investor, Digital Nomad, Business Plus.
      • Mandatory reporting by hotels, landlords, universities, hospitals on foreign guests/students/patients.
      • Entry to protected/restricted areas subject to special permits; mountaineering expeditions need prior approval.
    • Penalties: Up to 7 years imprisonment and ₹10 lakh fine for forged documents; detention centres allowed for illegal foreigners till deportation.
    • Institutions:
      • National Immigration Authority for policy and central database.
      • Bureau of Immigration, led by Commissioner, for operations.

    About Immigration and Foreigners (Exemption) Order, 2025:

    • Overview: Issued by Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) on 1 Sept 2025 under Section 33 of the Immigration and Foreigners Act, 2025.
    • Objective: Consolidates earlier scattered exemptions to simplify rules, enable regional mobility with Nepal & Bhutan, extend humanitarian relief to refugees/persecuted minorities, and provide legal clarity to carriers.
    • Replaces: The Registration of Foreigners (Exemption) Order, 1957 and Immigration (Carriers’ Liability) Order, 2007.
    • Exemptions:
      • Indian Armed Forces members on duty and families using govt transport.
      • Indian citizens entering via Nepal/Bhutan borders.
      • Nepal & Bhutan citizens (except if entering from China, Hong Kong, Macau, Pakistan).
      • Tibetans registered with India, religious minorities from Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Pakistan (who entered before Dec 31, 2024), and Sri Lankan Tamils sheltered till Jan 9, 2015.
      • Diplomats, visa-on-arrival nationals, foreign military personnel on goodwill or exercises.
    • Carriers’ Liability: Rail, road, air, sea operators exempted where forged documents need expert verification or ships/aircraft are diverted.
    [UPSC 2021] With reference to India, consider the following statements:

    1.There is only one citizenship and one domicile.

    2.A citizen by birth only can become the Head of State.

    3.A foreigner, once granted citizenship, cannot be deprived of it under any circumstances.

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    Options: (a) 1 only* (b) 2 only (c) 1 and 3 (d) 2 and 3

     

  • [pib] Exercise ‘BRIGHT STAR 2025’

    Why in the News?

    India is set to participate with over 700 personnel from tri-services for 19th edition of Exercise Bright Star 2025 in Egypt.

    About Exercise Bright Star:

    • Origin: Began in 1980 as a US–Egypt bilateral drill after the Egypt–Israel peace treaty.
    • Nature: Now one of the largest and longest-running multinational tri-service military exercises in the Middle East.
    • Frequency: Held biennially in Egypt with the United States as the principal partner.
    • Objectives:
      • Enhance regional security and stability.
      • Improve jointness, interoperability, and operational coordination among partner nations.

    Key Highlights of the 2025 Edition:

    • Scale: Approximate 7,900 troops from 43 nations.
      • 13 countries directly deploying troops.
      • 30 countries participating as observers.
    • Strategic Significance:
      • Builds defence cooperation between India, Egypt, US, and partner nations.
      • Important amid West Asia, Red Sea, and Gulf security challenges.
    [UPSC 2024] Which of the following statements about ‘Exercise Mitra Shakti-2023’ are correct?

    1. This was a joint military exercise between India and Bangladesh.

    2. It commenced in Aundh (Pune).

    3. Joint response during counter-terrorism operations was a goal of this operation.

    4. Indian Air Force was a part of this exercise.

    Select the answer using the code given below:

    Options: (a) 1, 2 and 3 (b) 1 and 4 (c) 1 and 4 (d) 2, 3 and 4*

     

  • Exercise Maitree

    Why in the News?

    The 14th Maitree Exercise between Indian and Thai Army will be held in Umroi, Meghalaya returning to India after five years.

    About Exercise Maitree:

    • Overview: A bilateral military exercise between the Indian Army and the Royal Thai Army.
    • Started: 2006, as a collaborative initiative to deepen defense ties.
    • Frequency: Held annually, alternating between India and Thailand.
    • Participants: Company-level contingents (approx. 70–80 soldiers each); Indian units have included Ladakh Scouts, while Thai units have included Infantry Regiments.
    • Objective: To build interoperability, mutual trust, and cooperation in counter-terrorism, insurgency management, and peacekeeping operations.

    Key Features:

    • Counter-Terrorism Focus: Joint training for counter-terror and counter-insurgency operations, especially in semi-urban and jungle terrain.
    • UN Mandate Training: Exercises designed to simulate peacekeeping operations under UN Charter VII.
    • Humanitarian Drills: Includes disaster relief, humanitarian assistance, and urban evacuation operations.
    • Strategic Relevance:
      • Strengthens India–Thailand defense cooperation under the 2012 MoU.
      • Supports India’s Act East Policy and shared maritime/strategic interests in the Bay of Bengal–Andaman Sea region.
      • Enhances interoperability for multinational operations and regional stability.
    [UPSC 2024] Which of the following statements about ‘Exercise Mitra Shakti-2023’ are correct?

    1. This was a joint military exercise between India and Bangladesh.

    2. It commenced in Aundh (Pune).

    3. Joint response during counter-terrorism operations was a goal of this operation.

    4. Indian Air Force was a part of this exercise.

    Select the answer using the code given below:

    Options: (a) 1, 2 and 3 (b) 1 and 4 (c) 1 and 4 (d) 2, 3 and 4*

     

  • Induction of INS Udaygiri and INS Himgiri Stealth Nilgiri Class Frigates

    Why in the News?

    The Indian Navy has commissioned INS Udaygiri and INS Himgiri, Nilgiri-class frigates built under Project 17A, at Visakhapatnam.

    Induction of INS Udaygiri and INS Himgiri Stealth Nilgiri Class Frigates

    About INS Udaygiri & INS Himgiri:

    Feature INS Udaygiri INS Himgiri
    Builder Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd. (MDL), Mumbai Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers (GRSE), Kolkata
    Series / Class 2nd ship of Project 17A;

    100th vessel designed by Navy’s Warship Design Bureau

    1st Project 17A frigate from GRSE
    Naming After Udaygiri mountain range (AP); earlier ship (1976–2007) Legacy of original INS Himgiri (1974–2005)
    Displacement / Size ~6,700 tonnes ~6,670 tonnes; Length: 149 m
    Propulsion CODOG (Combined Diesel or Gas) CODOG; speeds 28+ knots
    Stealth Features Reduced radar, infrared, and acoustic signatures Enhanced radar & IR signature reduction
    Armament BrahMos, Barak-8 SAMs, 76 mm gun, CIWS, advanced ASW weapons BrahMos, Barak-8, CIWS, ASW rocket launchers, torpedo tubes, EW systems
    Aviation Facilities – Flight deck + hangar for MH-60 Romeo, ALH Dhruv Mk-III, Sea King helicopters
    Indigenous Content ~75% (local sensors, systems, IPMS) ~75%

     

    [UPSC 2016] Which one of the following is the best description of ‘INS Astradharini’, that was in the news recently?

    Options: (a) Amphibious warfare ship (b) Nuclear-powered submarine (c) Torpedo launch and recovery vessel* (d) Nuclear-powered aircraft carrier

     

  • How have deception techniques evolved

    Introduction

    Modern warfare is no longer about firepower alone; it is equally about deception. As precision-guided missiles, drones, and AI-enabled targeting systems grow deadlier, militaries are turning to decoy technologies to confuse radars, mislead missiles, and protect valuable assets. India’s reported use of the AI-enabled X-Guard decoy during Operation Sindoor shows how deception has become a central element of national security strategy.

    The Growing Relevance of Deception in Modern Warfare:

    1. Evolving threat environment: Precision-guided munitions, drones, and AI-enabled targeting systems make military platforms highly vulnerable.
    2. Strategic asset: Decoys create confusion, waste enemy munitions, and buy crucial time for retaliation.
    3. Game-changing event: Operation Sindoor showcased India’s successful use of an AI-enabled decoy, termed by experts as “the best instance of spoofing and deception ever seen.”

    Inside the X-Guard Fibre-Optic Towed Decoy 

    1. Lightweight & reusable: At just 30 kg, retractable and deployable in flight.
    2. Radar mimicry: Replicates the Rafale’s Radar Cross Section (RCS), doppler velocity, and spectral signature across multiple bands.
    3. 360-degree jamming: Works seamlessly with the Rafale’s SPECTRA suite to form a layered defensive shield.
    4. Operational success: Reports suggest Pakistan’s J-10C fighters misidentified decoys as actual aircraft, wasting advanced PL-15E missiles.

    Global landscape of comparable decoy systems: 

    1. BriteCloud (Leonardo UL): Used on Eurofighter Typhoons, Gripen-Es, and some F-16s.
    2. AN/ALE-50/55 series (Raytheon/BAE Systems): Deployed on U.S. Navy F/A-18E/F Super Hornets.
    3. Adaptability to UAVs: Modified for platforms like Israeli Herons and U.S. MQ-9 Reapers.

    Battlefield deception on Land Forces: 

    1. Inflatable & heat-emitting decoys: Simulate tanks, artillery, and missile batteries to divert strikes.
    2. Ukraine’s wooden & 3D-printed fakes: Exhaust Russian drone and missile stocks.
    3. Russia’s Inflatech decoys: Create entire armoured formations in minutes.
    4. Indian Army initiative (2025): Issued a request for decoys mimicking T-90 tanks, including thermal and acoustic signatures.

    Naval countermeasures and Decoy strategies

    1. Layered naval countermeasures: Chaff, acoustic decoys, and offboard active deception protect against missiles and submarines.
    2. Nulka decoy (Australia–U.S.): Self-propelled system mimicking large ship radar signatures to mislead missile guidance.

    Conclusion

    Deception, once limited to camouflage and dummy equipment, has evolved into a sophisticated digital-age shield. Airborne fibre-optic decoys, inflatable ground tanks, and naval missile deflectors now define modern survivability. India’s reported use of the X-Guard highlights its adaptation to the evolving battlefield. For a relatively low investment, such systems deliver high-impact protection, proving that in the wars of tomorrow, deception may be as decisive as destruction.

    PYQ Relevance

    “How is S-400 air defence system technically superior to any other system presently available in the world?”

    Linkage: This question shows UPSC’s focus on defence technology and comparative capability analysis. The same lens applies to India’s deployment of AI-enabled decoys like the X-Guard FOTD, which enhance survivability against advanced missile systems. Both highlight the importance of evaluating cutting-edge military technology for national security.

  • Integrated Air Defence Weapon System (IADWS) 

    Why in the News?

    The DRDO has successfully conducted the maiden flight-tests of the Integrated Air Defence Weapon System (IADWS) off the coast of Odisha.

    Integrated Air Defence Weapon System (IADWS) 

    About the Indigenous Air Defence Weapon System (IADWS):

    • Overview: A multi-layered indigenous system developed to neutralise a wide spectrum of aerial threats.
    • Integration: Combines 3 components viz. Quick Reaction Surface-to-Air Missiles (QRSAM), Very Short Range Air Defence System (VSHORADS), and Directed Energy Weapon (DEW).
    • Control: All systems are networked through a Command-and-Control Centre developed by the Defence Research and Development Laboratory (DRDL), Hyderabad.

    Key Components of IADWS:

    1. QRSAM:
      • Short-range missile system for protecting moving Army armoured formations.
      • Range: 3–30 km.
      • Equipped with 360° surveillance and tracking radars.
      • Fully automated, mobile, and capable of “search on move” and “track on move.”
    2. VSHORADS:
      • Fourth-generation man-portable air defence system (MANPAD).
      • Range: 300 m – 6 km.
      • Targets include drones, UAVs, and low-altitude aerial threats.
      • Deployable across Army, Navy, and Air Force.
    3. Directed Energy Weapon (DEW):
      • Vehicle-mounted laser system.
      • Range: <3 km.
      • Proven in field trials against UAVs and drone swarms.

    Strategic Significance:

    • Multi-Layer Defence: Provides aerial protection up to 30 km against threats from drones to fighter jets.
    • Self-Reliance: Enhances indigenous capability, reducing dependence on imported defence systems.
    • National Security: Strengthens preparedness for Mission Sudarshan Chakra — India’s planned national air defence shield.
    • Technological Integration: Demonstrates India’s leap in combining missile and laser-based defence on a single platform.
    • Geostrategic Importance: Seen as a milestone in India’s path to advanced, self-reliant defence systems.
    [UPSC 2018] What is “Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD)”, sometimes seen in the news?

    Options:

    (a) An Israeli radar system

    (b) India’s indigenous anti-missile programme

    (c) An American anti-missile system*

    (d) A defence collaboration between Japan and South Korea

     

  • The Waning of Insurgency: Decline of Naxalism in India

    PYQ Relevance:

    [UPSC 2013] Left Wing Extremism (LWE) is showing a downward trend, but still affects many parts of the country. Briefly explain the socio-economic issues that contribute to LWE, and the measures taken by the government to address them.

    Linkage: The question resonates with the article’s focus on the downward curve of Naxalism while stressing that socio-economic deprivations among tribals and the rural poor have historically sustained the movement. It also connects with the state’s twin approach of security operations and development interventions that are gradually weakening Left Wing Extremism.

    Mentor’s Comment: The narrative of militancy in India is shifting. While the world warns of AI-fuelled terrorism and increasingly sophisticated threats, India is witnessing a rare counter-trend, a decline in ideologically-driven insurgencies such as Naxalism. This moment is not just a statistic; it’s a significant turning point in the country’s internal security landscape, marking the potential closure of a decades-long chapter that once defined violent dissent in India.

    Introduction

    At a time when global terrorism persists ranging from lone-wolf attacks to fears of AI-enabled bio-terrorism India is witnessing an unprecedented success story. Naxalism, an ideologically-driven insurgency that once gripped large parts of the country, is in clear decline. For the first time, the Union Home Minister has set a timeline, predicting its “final demise” by mid-2026.

    The Changing Global and Indian Terrorism Landscape

    How does global terrorism contrast with India’s current experience?

    1. Persistent global threat: A quarter-century after 9/11, jihadist violence remains potent, with incidents such as IS-inspired vehicle rammings in Europe and the U.S.
    2. Emerging AI-driven dangers: Concerns over terrorists accessing bio-weapons or misaligned AI pose new challenges.
    3. India’s divergence: While global trends show intensification, India is experiencing a declining curve in ideologically-oriented militancy, particularly Naxalism.

    From ‘Spring Thunder’ to a Fading Echo — The Rise and Decline of Naxalism

    1. Revolutionary origins: Inspired by Mao, Ho Chi Minh, and Che Guevara, the late 1960s Naxalite movement attracted students, intellectuals, and marginalized groups.
    2. Loss of ideological cohesion: Splits into regional factions eroded the all-India character of the movement.
    3. Degeneration into violence: From targeted political action, it shifted to indiscriminate killings, losing public sympathy.

    Why is Naxalism Declining?

    1. Sustained Offensive (2024 onwards): Coordinated security operations across states have eliminated thousands of cadres.
    2. Major Losses: Even the banned CPI (Maoist) admitted 357 cadres killed in one year, over one-third of them women.
    3. Leadership & Territorial Shrinkage: The removal of top leaders like Ganapathi and confinement of the insurgency to the Dandakaranya region reflect its weakening base.
    4. Weakening: Infighting and loss of ideological cohesion have eroded its strength.

    India’s Approach vs. U.S. ‘War on Terror’

    1. U.S. model: Heavy reliance on brute force in places like Somalia and Yemen.
    2. India’s model: A calibrated strategy with checks on use of force, mindful of the Naxalites’ local roots. The SAMADHAN Doctrine—Smart leadership, Aggressive strategy, Motivation, Intelligence, Technology use, Local action plans, and choking finances—has guided the campaign.

    India’s Approach vs U.S. ‘War on Terror’

    1. Ideological vs non-ideological targets: U.S. campaigns focused on jihadists abroad; India’s on militants embedded in local communities.
    2. Checks and balances: India traditionally limited brute force, using it selectively.
    3. Community linkage: Naxalites often lived among villagers, complicating security responses.

    Original Naxalites vs. “Urban Naxals”

    1. Original movement: The 1960s “Spring Thunder Over India” drew inspiration from Mao and Che Guevara, but degenerated into fragmented violence.
    2. Contemporary misuse: Today’s “urban naxals” are loosely-knit intellectual critics of government policy, lacking the ideological foundation of the original movement. Misclassification of the two risks policy errors.

    The ‘Urban Naxal’ Misclassification Problem

    1. Original movement’s structure: Marxist-Leninist framework with defined goals and ideology.
    2. Today’s ‘urban naxals’: Loosely connected intellectuals critical of government policies, lacking direct insurgent links.
    3. Policy risk: Mislabeling can distort understanding, leading to inappropriate responses and latent security risks.

    Conclusion

    The decline of Naxalism marks an inflection point in India’s internal security narrative. Yet, premature declarations of victory must be avoided, as history shows insurgencies can mutate or re-emerge. Accurate threat classification, addressing root grievances, and avoiding cognitive blind spots will be key to ensuring that the “end of Naxalism” is indeed a lasting reality.

    Value Addition 

    1. Decline of the “Red Corridor”: Once widespread, Naxal influence is now confined to limited forest belts.
    2. Development & Governance: Infrastructure, education, healthcare, and tribal rights reforms have severed the Naxal-village link.
    3. Internal Security Gains: Security forces are freed for other challenges; development projects can now expand into previously inaccessible regions.

    Practice Mains Question

    Discuss the factors contributing to the decline of Naxalism in India and examine the implications for the country’s internal security architecture.

  • India needs a ‘defence cess’ to fund military modernisation

    With such a levy on high-end goods, spending on luxury will become a visible public act of support for the armed forces. In an era of evolving warfare, from stealth jets to AI-driven drones, India’s defence preparedness is no longer optional, it is existential. This article proposes a ‘Defence Cess’ on luxury goods and services, offering a creative, emotionally resonant, and fiscally sustainable mechanism to ring-fence funds for military modernisation. This issue links directly to GS Paper II (Governance), GS Paper III (Security and Economy), and GS IV (Ethics, especially public accountability and duty).

    The Strategic Urgency: Why Modernisation Can’t Wait

    India is increasingly surrounded by hostile neighbours with fast-upgrading military capacities:

    1. Pakistan may soon induct stealth fighters like J-20 or J-35 from China.
    2. China is testing sixth-generation aircraft and has strong cyber and drone warfare capabilities.
    3. The Indian Air Force (IAF), by contrast, operates only 32 squadrons vs the sanctioned strength of 42 — leaving India strategically exposed in contested airspace.

    Key Quote: “Capability alone is not enough. The country cannot afford to be vulnerable.”

    Modernisation is Existential, Not Aspirational

    India’s military modernisation roadmap is ambitious but underfunded. It includes:

    1. Fifth-generation fighter aircraft development (AMCA)
    2. Indigenous jet engine programmes
    3. Strategic unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs)
    4. Electronic warfare (EW) and cyber-capacity enhancement

    But while intent exists, execution suffers from fragmented schemes, budgetary limitations, and lack of dedicated long-term funding.

    The Defence Cess Proposal: Key Features

    1. A 5–10% surcharge on ultra-luxury goods and services like High-end cars, Private jets, Imported luxury watches, Premium liquor, etc.
    2. Clearly itemised on invoices as “Raksha Cess”
    3. Funds are non-lapsable, targeted, and traceable
    4. Exclusively for capital expenditure in Procurement, R&D, Infrastructure for defence

    Global Parallels and Precedents

    Defence/Strategic Taxation Model
    Italy Luxury tax on yachts and helicopters during Eurozone crisis
    Sweden Long-standing luxury taxation for social balance
    China Anti-extravagance drive redirected elite consumption toward strategic sectors

    These countries have used fiscal mechanisms not just to fund strategy but to shape public narratives, blending consumption with national responsibility.

    Why a Defence Cess Works for India

    1. Psychological and Symbolic Impact: The idea of contributing directly to the betterment of Indian defence through luxury spending has strong emotional appeal. It creates a moral linkage between indulgence and national duty converting private consumption into public solidarity. Naming it “Raksha Cess” makes it resonate with patriotism and responsibility.
    2. Fiscal Innovation Without Burdening the Masses: India’s direct tax base is relatively narrow, and increasing defence funding through general taxation could hurt the middle class or poor. This cess targets only high-end consumers, ensuring that additional fiscal pressure is placed on those most capable of bearing it. Luxury spending has grown significantly with India’s rising affluent class, this captures a booming sector for national good.
    3. Transparency and Traceability: Since the cess is itemised separately on invoices, it allows greater transparency. It increases trust in government utilisation and may lead to greater tax compliance if people know exactly where their money goes. With digitised billing and GST-era infrastructure, monitoring and reporting mechanisms already exist to track such surcharges.
    4. Dedicated, Ring-Fenced Defence Fund: Current defence allocations are diluted across revenue expenses and pensions. It helps bypass routine bureaucratic delays and ensures directed capital spending. A defence cess would be non-lapsable and strictly for capital expenditure — such as: Acquiring new aircraft, R&D in defence tech and Indigenous manufacturing. This enables long-term strategic planning free from annual budget cycles.
    5. Aligns India With Global Practices: Many countries (Italy, Sweden, China) have used luxury taxation or targeted levies to support strategic sectors or correct fiscal imbalances. India can draw from these models to introduce a fiscally sound and globally validated mechanism.
    6. Boosts the Narrative of Nation-Building: In an era where narratives matter, this proposal encourages voluntary nation-building and elite participation in national security. It sends a message that “those who benefit most from India’s rise should contribute most to its protection.”

    Challenges in Implementing a Defence Cess:

    1. Legal and Fiscal Complexity: Introducing a cess outside the GST framework may face legal and administrative hurdles, requiring amendments or coordination with the GST Council. There may be opposition from States citing federal fiscal concerns
    2. Risk of Misuse or Leakage: Any fund not managed with full transparency and oversight can fall prey to inefficiency or corruption. Strong audit systems and public reporting mechanisms must be built into the cess architecture from the outset.
    3. Need for a Clear Governance Structure: A dedicated body or fund management unit should be created under the Ministry of Defence or PMO, preferably with civil society representation for accountability. Without such a structure, funds may be diverted or underutilised.
    4. Revenue Predictability and Scale: Luxury consumption is inelastic but cyclical, it may dip during economic downturns. The fund should not be over-relied upon for core defence needs; rather, it must act as a complementary booster.
    5. Perception Management and Political Pushback: Some may view this as a populist or performative move, or even as a “sin tax on success”. There must be consistent and transparent communication that this is about contribution, not punishment.
    6. Moral Optics and Class Tensions: Care must be taken to avoid triggering class resentment or elite backlash, especially if the tax seems punitive. Framing it as “a privilege with purpose” is crucial — the messaging has to be inclusive, not divisive.

    Conclusion: From Passive Consumers to Active Nation-Builders

    India’s national security demands not just better weapons, but a sustainable model of public contribution and political imagination. A well-designed defence cess could convert elite indulgence into national insurance, creating a visible alignment between privilege and responsibility.

    Value Addition

    India’s Defence Modernisation: 

    What Has Been Done: What is being planned
    • Tejas Mk-1A production initiated (HAL)
    • Strategic partnerships under DPP-2020 for indigenous manufacturing
    • Agni Prime, INS Vikrant, and SAM systems development
    • Defence exports crossed ₹21,000 crore in 2023-24
    • Emergency procurement powers given to armed forces post-Galwan
    • AMCA (Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft) — 5th Gen fighter
    • Twin-engine deck-based fighter (TEDBF) for Navy
    • India-US Jet Engine Deal (GE-HAL) under iCET
    • India-France agreement for submarine co-development
    • Cyber and AI warfare units under Theatre Command model

    Important Agreements and Collaborations:

    Country Collaboration
    USA iCET, Jet Engine tech transfer (GE -F414)
    France Rafale aircraft, scorpene submarine
    Israel Missile defence (Barak-8)
    Russia S-400 Missile systems, AK-203 Rifles

    Important Defence Policies:

    1. Defence Acquisition Procedure (DAP) 2020: Goal: To streamline the procurement process for the Indian Armed Forces, promoting indigenization and efficiency. Prioritizes “Buy Indian” categories, Enhanced Indigenous Content (IC), Simplification of Trial and Testing Procedures and has Emphasis on Make and Innovation.
    2. Innovations for Defence Excellence (iDEX): Goal: To foster an ecosystem for innovation and technology development in the defence and aerospace sectors, leveraging the potential of startups, MSMEs, academia, and individual innovators. It is managed by Defence Innovation Organization (DIO), a not-for-profit company founded by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) & Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL).
    3. DRDO’s 5-Year Roadmap (Vision 2025): Goal: To lead India towards self-reliance in defence technologies and become a global leader in defence research and development.