💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Subject: Social Justice

  • 50 years of Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) Scheme

    Why in the News?

    The Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) scheme, launched on 2 October 1975 by then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, has completed 50 years in 2025.

    50 years of Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) Scheme

    What is Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) Scheme?

    • Launched: 2nd October 1975 by PM Indira Gandhi.
    • Nodal Ministry: Ministry of Women and Child Development (MoWCD).
    • Nature: Flagship centrally sponsored scheme and world’s largest community-based outreach programme for early childhood care.
    • Beneficiaries: Children (0–6 years), pregnant women, lactating mothers, and adolescent girls (under extensions).
    • Objectives:
      • Improve nutritional and health status of 0–6 year children.
      • Lay foundation for physical, psychological, and social development.
      • Reduce mortality, morbidity, malnutrition, and school dropouts.
      • Provide non-formal pre-school education.
      • Enhance maternal health & nutrition awareness.

    About Umbrella ICDS Scheme:

    • Origin: The Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) scheme was restructured and renamed as the Umbrella ICDS scheme in 2016–17.
    • Aim: Strengthen child nutrition, early childhood care, adolescent girl support, and child protection services.
    • Key Feature: Convergence model – Anganwadi Centres serve as hubs delivering integrated health, nutrition, and education.
    • Funding Pattern:
      • General States: 60:40 (Centre: State).
      • Supplementary Nutrition: 50:50.
      • NE & Himalayan States: 90:10.
      • UTs without legislatures: 100% Centre.

    Key Components and Their Features

    1. Anganwadi Services

    • Core ICDS component.
    • Provides six services: supplementary nutrition, pre-school non-formal education, health check-ups, immunization, referral services, and nutrition/health education.
    • Nutrition support: Take-Home Rations (THR), Hot Cooked Meals, snacks.

    1. Pradhan Mantri Matru Vandana Yojana (PMMVY)

    • Conditional cash transfer scheme for pregnant and lactating women.
    • Provides ₹5,000 in three instalments for wage loss, nutrition, and healthcare.
    • Delivered through Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT).

    1. National Creche Scheme

    • Day-care facilities for children (6 months–6 years) of working women.
    • Services include supplementary nutrition, early childcare education, health check-ups, and sleeping facilities.
    • Functions 7.5 hours/day, 26 days/month.

    1. Scheme for Adolescent Girls (SAG – SABLA)

    • Focus on out-of-school girls (11–14 years).
    • Nutrition support: 600 kcal/day, 18–20 g protein.
    • Non-nutrition support: life skills, home management, health & hygiene awareness, educational and skill training.
    • Encourages mainstreaming into formal education and skill development.

    1. Child Protection Services (CPS)

    • Ensures care, protection, and rehabilitation of children in difficult situations.
    • Prevents abuse, exploitation, neglect, and family separation.
    • Runs child care institutions, helplines, adoption and foster care systems.

    1. POSHAN Abhiyaan (National Nutrition Mission)

    • Launched in 2018 to reduce stunting, anaemia, and low birth weight.
    • Uses Poshan Tracker (ICT-based real-time monitoring).
    • Promotes inter-ministerial convergence and community participation via Poshan Maah and Poshan Pakhwada.
    [UPSC 2013] Consider the following statements in relation to Janani Suraksha Yojna:

    1. It is safe motherhood intervention of the State Health Departments.

    2. Its objective is to reduce maternal and neonatal mortality among poor pregnant women.

    3. It aims to promote institutional delivery among poor pregnant women.

    4. Its objective includes providing public health facilities to sick infants up to one year of age.

    How many of the statements given above are correct?

    Options: (a) Only one (b) Only two* (c) Only three (d) All four

     

  • The transformation of girls education

    Introduction

    “Beti padhegi toh kya karegi?” — a once common phrase in Indian households, captures the deep-rooted gender bias against girls’ education. In sharp contrast, India today is witnessing a remarkable transformation where girls’ education is not only improving literacy rates but also shaping health, fertility, workforce participation, and leadership outcomes. This transformation, spearheaded by initiatives like Kanya Kelavani in Gujarat and later Beti Bachao Beti Padhao (BBBP) at the national level, represents a structural and cultural shift in Indian society.

    Why is this transformation in the news?

    Girls’ education in India is witnessing measurable improvements backed by accountability and systemic policy pushes. The nationwide BBBP initiative, initially launched in 100 gender-critical districts, has led to a visible improvement in sex ratio at birth (919 in 2015-16 to 929 in 2019-21), reduced female dropout rates, and higher female literacy in states like Gujarat. These achievements are striking because they stand in contrast to decades of entrenched female foeticide, poor infrastructure for girls, and deep social stigma. For the first time, policy, leadership, and public movements have converged to change mindsets at scale, making this one of the most significant social transformations of contemporary India.

    The Gujarat Model of Change

    1. Multi-pronged approach: Tackled female foeticide and illiteracy not just with laws but also through perception change, infrastructure, and incentives.
    2. Kanya Kelavani Campaign (2003): Focused on awareness, provision of toilets for girls (a major dropout factor), and community participation.
    3. Striking impact: Female literacy rate in Gujarat rose to 70% (above national average of 64%); dropout rates reduced by 90% in targeted districts.
    4. Symbolic leadership: PM Modi auctioned personal gifts raising ₹19 crore for girls’ education, alongside a personal donation of ₹21 lakh, signalling public ownership of the movement.

    Scaling Success Nationwide: Beti Bachao, Beti Padhao

    1. Launched in 2015: Nationwide expansion of Gujarat’s lessons to prevent female foeticide and promote education.
    2. Inter-ministerial coordination: Involved Women and Child Development, Health, and Education ministries for an integrated push.

    • Impact:

      1. Sex ratio at birth: Improved from 919 (2015-16) to 929 (2019-21).
      2. Wider coverage: Expanded beyond the initial 100 critical districts to pan-India.
      3. 20 out of 30 States/UTs performing better than national average sex ratio (930).

    The Ripple and Multiplier Effects of Educated Girls

    1. Demographic shift: Educated women marry later, have fewer children; Total Fertility Rate fell to 2.0 (below replacement).
    2. Health outcomes: More likely to seek institutional deliveries and prenatal care; Infant Mortality Rate reduced from 49 (2014) to 33 (2020).
    3. Economic participation: Rising visibility in healthcare, STEM, education, entrepreneurship, armed forces, and tech leadership.
    4. Intergenerational impact: Children of educated mothers perform better in school, with healthier outcomes.
    5. Changing mindsets: In Madhya Pradesh, 89.5% aware of BBBP, and 63.2% credited it with motivating families to send daughters to school.

    Challenges Ahead

    1. Labour force participation: Despite progress, overall female labour participation remains low.
    2. Regional disparities: Some states and districts lag significantly in sex ratio and enrollment.
    3. Cultural inertia: Early marriages, dowry, and gendered household expectations still restrict education gains.

    Conclusion

    The transformation in girls’ education marks one of the most profound social revolutions in India. From Gujarat’s Kanya Kelavani to the nationwide BBBP, the shift is not only about literacy but about empowering women to be leaders, professionals, and change-makers. As the article highlights, when you educate a girl, you transform a society. Sustaining this momentum will be crucial for India’s journey towards equity, development, and inclusive growth.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2021] Though women in post-Independent India have excelled in various fields, the social attitude towards women and feminist movement has been patriarchal.” Apart from women education and women empowerment schemes, what interventions can help change this milieu?

    Linkage: The article shows that while education and schemes like BBBP have triggered change, sustained mindset shifts through community engagement, legal safeguards, and leadership-driven social movements are equally vital to challenge India’s patriarchal milieu.

  • Centre amends MGNREGA for Water Conservation in Scarcity Zones

    Why in the News?

    The Central Government has amended the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (2005) to mandate a minimum share of funds for water conservation and harvesting works. Earlier this month, MGNREGA completed 20 years of its implementation.

    What is entailed in this MGNREGA (2005) Amendment?

    • Objective: Prioritise long-term water management, shift focus from reactive drought relief to preventive groundwater conservation.
    • Provision Amended: Paragraph 4(2), Schedule I of MGNREGA (2005).
    • Mandate: Minimum share of MGNREGA funds earmarked for water conservation & harvesting works.
    • Allocation Criteria: Based on groundwater stress classification (Central Ground Water Board (CGWB) assessment):
      • 65% in over-exploited / critical (dark zones).
      • 40% in semi-critical blocks.
      • 30% in safe/non-critical blocks.
    • Responsibility: District Programme Coordinator / Programme Officer must ensure compliance.
    • Earlier Provision: Gram Panchayats could prioritise works; at least 60% of funds had to go to agriculture & allied works, including water.

    About MGNREGA:

    • Overview: MGNREGS is a rights-based Centrally Sponsored Scheme launched under the MGNREGA Act of 2005 to ensure the Right to Work for rural households.
    • Origins:
      • The idea of employment guarantee in India began with Maharashtra’s pilot, Employment Guarantee Scheme (MEGS), in 1965 under the Vasantrao Naik government.
      • At the national level, the idea was first proposed in 1991 by then PM P. V. Narasimha Rao and later enacted in 2005.
    • Employment Guarantee: It provides 100 days of wage employment per year to any adult willing to do unskilled manual labour in rural India.
    • Legal Obligation: It is the first law in India that imposes a legal duty on the government to provide employment and compensate for non-compliance.
    • Development Goal: The scheme aims to promote livelihood security, inclusive growth, and rural development.

    Key Features:

    • Statutory Right: Employment under MGNREGS is a legal entitlement, not just a welfare scheme.
    • Eligibility: Any rural adult aged 18 or above can apply and must be offered work within 15 days.
    • Proximity and Wages: Work must be provided within 5 km of the applicant’s residence with minimum wage, and delays attract compensation.
    • Unemployment Allowance: If work is not provided on time, the state must pay an allowance.
    • Demand-Driven Model: The scheme is worker-initiated, requiring the government to respond to demand.
    • Transparency and Audits: Regular social audits and online updates ensure accountability in job cards, muster rolls, and fund use.
    • Local Implementation: It is decentralised, led by Gram Panchayats, with support from block and state officials, and centrally funded.
    • Women’s Inclusion: At least one-third of beneficiaries must be women, enhancing gender equity.
    • Sustainable Assets: Projects focus on durable rural infrastructure like ponds, roads, canals, and plantations.
    [UPSC 2011] Among the following who are eligible to benefit from the “Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act”?

    (a) Adult members of only the scheduled caste and scheduled tribe households

    (b) Adult members of below poverty line (BPL) households

    (c) Adult members of households of all backward communities

    (d) Adult members of any household *

     

  • Lessons from India’s Vaccination Drive

    Introduction

    Vaccination is among the most effective and cost-efficient public health measures, credited with saving millions of lives globally. India, with its Universal Immunisation Programme (UIP), runs the world’s largest vaccination campaign annually, covering over 2.6 crore infants and 2.9 crore pregnant women. From eliminating polio and maternal/neonatal tetanus to spearheading COVID-19 vaccine development, India has emerged as a global leader in immunisation. Yet, challenges remain in ensuring last-mile delivery, tackling vaccine hesitancy, and integrating disease surveillance with vaccination systems.

    Expanding Reach through Mission Indradhanush

    1. Mission Indradhanush (MI): Launched in 2014 to achieve 90% full immunisation coverage, up from 62% in 2014 (NFHS-4).
    2. Intensified Mission Indradhanush (IMI): Began in 2017, targeting low-coverage and missed populations.
    3. Impact: By 2023, 12 phases of MI/IMI had vaccinated 5.46 crore children and 1.32 crore pregnant women.
    4. Integration: Linked with Gram Swaraj Abhiyan and Extended Gram Swaraj Abhiyan for greater outreach.

    What Has India Achieved through UIP?

    1. Decline in Mortality: Under-5 mortality dropped from 45 to 31 per 1,000 live births (2014–2021, SRS 2021).
    2. Expanded Vaccination Basket: 6 new vaccines added in the last decade (e.g., Rotavirus, Pneumococcal Conjugate, Measles-Rubella).

    Disease Elimination Milestones:

    1. Polio-free since 2011.
    2. Maternal and neonatal tetanus eliminated in 2015.
    3. Yaws eradicated in 2016.
    4. Recognition: Measles and Rubella Champion Award (2024).

    What Challenges Continue to Plague India’s Vaccination Efforts?

    1. Remote Populations: Hard-to-reach and migratory groups remain under-covered.
    2. Vaccine Hesitancy: Clusters with low awareness and misinformation hinder uptake.
    3. Pandemic Disruption: COVID-19 disrupted routine services, leading to measles outbreaks (2022–2024).
    4. Immunity Gaps: Outbreaks showed clustering of unimmunised children.

    How Has Technology Transformed Vaccine Delivery?

    Digital Platforms:

    1. U-WIN: End-to-end vaccination record tracking, modeled on Co-WIN.
    2. eVIN & Cold Chain MIS: Real-time vaccine stock and logistics monitoring.
    3. SAFE-VAC: Vaccine safety reporting.

    Pandemic Success:

    1. COVID-19 vaccination began Jan 16, 2021.
    2. By Jan 2023: 220 crore doses, 97% with one dose, 90% with both.
    3. Equity & Outreach: Enabled “anytime-anywhere” access for migratory groups.

    What Lessons Has India Shared with the World?

    1. Vaccine Maitri: Supported low- and middle-income countries, reflecting Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam.
    2. Domestic Manufacturing: Self-reliance through Make in India strategy.
    3. Global Leadership: World’s largest vaccine manufacturing hub, shaping global vaccine futures.

    Conclusion

    India’s vaccination drive demonstrates the transformative power of political will, technological innovation, and community participation. While achievements like polio eradication, COVID-19 vaccine success, and award-winning Measles-Rubella campaigns inspire global emulation, challenges of equity, hesitancy, and surveillance integration demand continued attention. The future lies in adopting a One-Health approach and strengthening linkages between disease surveillance and immunisation to ensure pandemic preparedness and universal vaccine coverage.

    PYQ Relevance:

    [UPSC 2022] What is the basic principle behind vaccine development? How do vaccines work? What approaches were adopted by the Indian vaccine manufacturers to produce COVID-19 vaccines?

    Linkage: This question is important for UPSC as it tests both the scientific principle of vaccine development and India’s capacity to innovate during crises like COVID-19. The article links by showing how vaccines, once developed, were scaled through UIP, Mission Indradhanush, and digital tools like U-WIN, reflecting the bridge between science and governance. It also highlights India’s global role via Vaccine Maitri and WHO recognition, making it a holistic case study for GS 3: Science & Technology and Public Health.

    Value Addition

    Universal Immunisation Programme (UIP)

    1. Definition: World’s largest immunisation programme, launched in 1985, providing free vaccines against 12 vaccine-preventable diseases.
    2. Coverage: Annually vaccinates 2.6 crore infants and 2.9 crore pregnant women.
    3. Relevance: Illustrates inclusive public health coverage, state capacity, and preventive healthcare.

    Mission Indradhanush (MI) / Intensified Mission Indradhanush (IMI)

    1. MI (2014): Launched to increase full immunisation coverage from 62% (NFHS-4, 2015–16) to 90%.
    2. IMI (2017): Focused on low-coverage areas and “left-out” children/women.
    3. Outcome: By 2023, 5.46 crore children and 1.32 crore pregnant women vaccinated under 12 phases.
    4. Relevance: Example of targeted governance and convergence with Gram Swaraj Abhiyan.

    Zero-dose Outreach

    1. Definition: Identifying and reaching children who have received no vaccines at all (first contact point for immunisation).
    2. Importance: Critical for equity in healthcare since such children often belong to marginalised, remote, or migratory populations.
    3. Relevance: Reflects SDG-3 (Good Health and Well-being) and commitment to leaving no one behind.

    U-WIN / eVIN / SAFE-VAC

    1. U-WIN: Successor to Co-WIN, a digital platform for real-time tracking of vaccination for pregnant women and children up to 16 years; enables portability for migrants.
    2. eVIN (Electronic Vaccine Intelligence Network): Ensures real-time monitoring of vaccine stocks.
    3. SAFE-VAC: Module for adverse events reporting and ensuring vaccine safety.
    4. Relevance: Showcases digital governance in health → transparent, accountable, efficient delivery.

    One-Health Approach

    1. Concept: Integrates surveillance of human, animal, and environmental health systems.
    2. Need: 75% of emerging infectious diseases are zoonotic (e.g., COVID-19).
    3. Application: Strengthens pandemic preparedness and ties immunisation with wider health surveillance.
    4. Relevance: A forward-looking framework for epidemic resilience and sustainable public health.

    Vaccine Maitri

    1. Definition: India’s global vaccine diplomacy initiative during COVID-19, supplying vaccines to 100+ countries.
    2. Impact: Cemented India’s role as “Pharmacy of the World”; strengthened ties with developing countries.
    3. Relevance: Example of health diplomacy, South-South cooperation, and global public good.

    Reports & Data

    NFHS-4 (2015–16)

    1. Report Name: National Family Health Survey – Round 4.
    2. Finding: India’s full immunisation coverage was 62% in 2014.
    3. Significance: Provided the baseline for Mission Indradhanush.
    4. Relevance: Evidence-based policymaking; highlights gaps in equity and access.

    Sample Registration System (SRS) 2021

    1. Significance: Clear evidence of immunisation’s role in improving child survival.
    2. Relevance: Shows how preventive healthcare directly impacts SDG-3 (Health & Well-being).

    Measles-Rubella (MR) Campaign (2017–19)

    1. Coverage: 34.8 crore children aged 9 months–15 years vaccinated.
    2. Significance: Largest catch-up campaign globally.
    3. Relevance: Example of mass public mobilisation and vaccine diplomacy readiness.

    Key Concepts:

    Zero-dose Outreach

    1. Definition: Identifying and immunising children who have not received a single vaccine.
    2. Importance: They represent the most vulnerable clusters (remote, migratory, socio-economically deprived).
    3. UPSC Link: Equity in health, SDG-3, “Leaving no one behind”.

    One-Health Lens

    1. Definition: Integrated surveillance of human, animal, and environmental health.
    2. Why: 75% of emerging infectious diseases are zoonotic (e.g., COVID-19, Nipah).
    3. Application: Prevents epidemics by connecting immunisation with disease surveillance across ecosystems.
    4. UPSC Link: Pandemic preparedness, sustainable health governance.

  • [23rd September 2025] The Hindu Op-ed: The growing relevance of traditional medicine

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2019] How is the Government of India protecting traditional knowledge of medicine from patenting by pharmaceutical companies?

    Linkage: The question on protecting traditional knowledge from patenting directly links with India’s global Ayurveda outreach and the WHO Global Traditional Medicine Centre, which focus on safeguarding and validating traditional systems. The article highlights India’s investment in research, standardisation, and international cooperation to integrate and protect Ayurveda while projecting it globally.

    Mentor’s Comment

    The significance of traditional medicine has moved far beyond being an alternative to modern healthcare. With its widespread practice across 170 countries, increasing global market share, and India’s leadership through AYUSH, traditional medicine now represents a paradigm shift from reactive to preventive healthcare. This article explores the transformation of traditional medicine, India’s global leadership, scientific validation, and its contemporary relevance in addressing both lifestyle diseases and climate change.

    Introduction

    Traditional medicine, once considered peripheral to mainstream health systems, is increasingly being recognised as central to global health. The World Health Organization reports that 88% of its member-states practise traditional medicine, making it a cornerstone of healthcare for billions. India, with its vibrant AYUSH sector, is at the forefront of this transformation — combining ancient wisdom with modern science, and positioning itself as a global leader in preventive, sustainable, and inclusive healthcare.

    Why is traditional medicine in the news?

    The growing relevance of Ayurveda and related systems has been highlighted due to multiple firsts and major developments. The WHO Global Traditional Medicine Centre in India marks a historic milestone, anchoring India as a hub for global research and innovation in this field. The AYUSH industry’s eight-fold growth within a decade, and exports reaching $1.54 billion to 150 countries, reflect the scale of transformation. With the 2025 theme of “Ayurveda for People & Planet”, traditional medicine is being reframed not just as healthcare but as a holistic movement addressing lifestyle diseases, biodiversity conservation, and climate change.

    How significant is the global presence of traditional medicine?

    1. WHO report: 170 of 194 countries (88%) practise traditional medicine.
    2. Primary healthcare: For billions in low- and middle-income countries, it remains the first line of treatment due to affordability and accessibility.
    3. Market size: Global traditional medicine market projected to hit $583 billion by 2025, growing at 10–20% annually.
    4. Country data: China’s TCM valued at $122.4 billion, Australia’s herbal medicine at $3.97 billion, India’s AYUSH sector at $43.4 billion.

    What has been India’s transformation in AYUSH?

    1. Industrial growth: Over 92,000 MSMEs drive the AYUSH sector. Revenues expanded from ₹21,697 crore (2014-15) to ₹1.37 lakh crore today.
    2. Services sector: Generated ₹1.67 lakh crore in revenue.
    3. Exports: AYUSH and herbal products worth $1.54 billion reach over 150 countries.
    4. Recognition abroad: Ayurveda now has formal recognition as a medical system in multiple nations.
    5. Public awareness: NSSO (2022-23) survey — 95% rural, 96% urban awareness; over half of India used AYUSH in the past year.

    How is India promoting scientific validation and global outreach?

    1. Research institutions: AIIMS Ayurveda, National Institute of Ayurveda, and CCRAS focus on drug standardisation, clinical validation, and integrative care models.
    2. International cooperation: 25 bilateral agreements, 52 institutional partnerships, 43 AYUSH cells in 39 countries, 15 academic chairs abroad.
    3. WHO Centre: WHO Global Traditional Medicine Centre in India integrates traditional knowledge with AI, big data, and digital health.
    4. AI integration: WHO publication highlights AI’s role in predictive care and strengthening clinical validation.

    Why is Ayurveda relevant to global challenges today?

    1. Philosophy of balance: Between body–mind, human–nature, consumption–conservation.
    2. Lifestyle diseases: Offers preventive care against rising global non-communicable diseases.
    3. Climate change: Promotes sustainability and biodiversity conservation.
    4. Beyond humans: Extends to veterinary care and plant health.
    5. Theme 2025: “Ayurveda for People & Planet” underlines Ayurveda as both a wellness system and a planetary health framework.

    Conclusion

    Traditional medicine, led by Ayurveda, has transitioned from being an ancient practice to a modern global movement. India’s leadership, backed by research, exports, and global outreach, has made it central to the evolving global health architecture. As the world faces lifestyle disorders and ecological crises, Ayurveda’s holistic framework offers sustainable solutions for both people and the planet.

  • Trans People deserve better

    Introduction

    The struggles of India’s transgender community highlight the deep chasm between constitutional guarantees of equality and the lived reality of marginalisation. Despite progressive measures such as the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019, welfare schemes, and quotas in education and employment, access to these rights often remains obstructed by bureaucracy, social prejudice, and tokenism. The issue is not confined to a minority group alone; it reflects a larger national loss of talent, creativity, and human capital. Denial of dignity and opportunities to gender minorities undermines India’s democratic fabric, making it imperative that policies move beyond symbolic gestures towards genuine representation, enforceable protections, and inclusive development. This article is a stark reminder that policy is not paperwork, but life itself.

    Legal & Policy Framework for Transgender Rights in India:

    Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019

    1. Comprehensive protections – The Act prohibits discrimination against transgender persons in education, employment, healthcare, housing, and access to public services.
    2. Legal recognition – It affirms the right of individuals to be recognised as transgender and ensures access to identity documents in accordance with their self-perceived gender.
    3. Obligations on institutions – Schools, workplaces, and healthcare institutions are legally bound to create safe, inclusive environments, though implementation remains weak.
    4. Critical limitation – While progressive, the Act has faced criticism for requiring medical boards’ involvement in recognising gender, which many activists argue undermines the principle of self-identification upheld in NALSA v. Union of India (2014).

    NITI Aayog’s SDG India Index

    1. Measuring inclusivity – The Index tracks progress towards Sustainable Development Goals, with transgender inclusion mapped to SDG 5 (Gender Equality) and SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities).
    2. Policy relevance – States are ranked on inclusivity measures, encouraging competitive federalism to adopt progressive policies.
    3. Limitations – Despite formal inclusion in metrics, ground-level impact remains limited, with most States lagging in transgender-specific initiatives.

    National Portal for Transgender Persons (2020)

    1. Ease of certification – A digital platform was launched to streamline self-identification and certification of transgender persons without cumbersome physical verification.
    2. Access to welfare schemes – The portal links beneficiaries to scholarships, healthcare support, and livelihood initiatives.
    3. Barrier reduction – Aimed to reduce harassment and delays in government offices, but digital literacy and awareness remain challenges.

    Government Schemes and Initiatives:

    SMILE Scheme (2022)

    1. Full form: Support for Marginalised Individuals for Livelihood and Enterprise.
    2. Livelihood support – Offers vocational training, financial assistance, and rehabilitation to transgender persons and others in vulnerable conditions (e.g., beggars).
    3. Holistic rehabilitation – Focus on dignity through sustainable income opportunities, not just short-term aid.

    Garima Greh (Shelter Homes for Transgender Persons)

    1. Safe housing – Provides temporary shelter to transgender persons in need, particularly those facing family rejection or homelessness.
    2. Rehabilitation support – Along with accommodation, offers skill-building, counselling, and reintegration programmes.
    3. Geographical spread – Shelters are being established in multiple States, though demand far outstrips supply.

    National Transgender Welfare Board

    1. Advisory role – Created to guide and monitor welfare schemes, policies, and rights protection for transgender persons.
    2. Policy advocacy – Acts as a bridge between community needs and government initiatives.
    3. Challenge – Effectiveness has been questioned due to limited representation from grassroots transgender voices.

    Why do policies remain hollow for transgender persons?

    1. Hollow quotas – Promises on paper, but weak implementation and bureaucratic humiliation in accessing them.
    2. Selective dispersal – Corruption and leakages mean benefits rarely reach genuine beneficiaries.
    3. Urban-rural gap – Schemes concentrated in cities, leaving rural transgender communities excluded.
    4. Insensitive officials – Lack of sensitisation among staff, police, and service providers reinforces stigma.
    5. Economic marginalisation – Limited job opportunities push many into begging or unsafe livelihoods.
    6. Weak accountability – No penalties for institutions failing to ensure inclusivity.
    7. Data deficit – Census undercounts transgender population, weakening policy design.
    8. Fragmented ecosystem – Welfare spread across ministries with poor coordination and monitoring.

    Why is access to basic needs still a challenge?

    1. Considerable Population– Over 4.87 lakh individuals identified as transgender, under the ‘Other’ gender category as per the 2011 census.
    2. Housing discrimination – Landlords refuse to rent, neighbours ostracise, and societies erect silent barricades, denying stability.
    3. Public ridicule – Buses, markets, and streets are unsafe; everyday survival requires courage against humiliation.
    4. Hunger and survival – With families abandoning them, many trans persons face destitution, leaving them vulnerable to unsafe livelihoods.

    How does exclusion repeat historical injustices?

    1. Historical parallels – Denial of rights to African-Americans and women earlier hollowed democracies; similarly, denying rights to trans persons repeats history’s mistakes.
    2. Loss of talent – Every trans child forced out of school means a lost scientist; every denied home displaces an artist; every humiliation silences a leader.

    Why is representation in politics critical?

    1. Beyond symbolism – Representation is structural, not tokenistic. Without trans voices in legislatures, policies reproduce privilege and blind spots.
    2. Absence in institutions – No trans person has been appointed to media boards despite censor boards clearing derogatory content against them.

    What are the urgent priorities for reform?

    1. Education – Scholarships, inclusive curricula, and anti-bullying measures are essential to prevent dropouts.
    2. Healthcare – Affordable, state-supported gender transition and mental health care; transition is survival, not cosmetic.
    3. Employment & housing – Anti-discrimination laws must be enforced with penalties, ensuring workplace inclusion and rental protections.

    Way Forward

    1. Enforceable protections – Move from symbolic promises to penalties for violations in housing, jobs, and education.
    2. Political representation – Reserved seats or political pathways must ensure gender minorities are participants in policymaking.
    3. Educational reform – Gender-sensitive curricula and anti-bullying frameworks to prevent dropouts.
    4. Cultural shift – Mainstream media, schools, and workplaces must promote respect and positive representation, not ridicule.
    5. Holistic inclusion – From healthcare to public spaces, dignity must be guaranteed as a right, not charity.

    Conclusion

    The resilience of transgender persons cannot substitute for rights. A nation that sidelines its gender minorities sidelines its own conscience and potential. Policy must no longer be about trans persons but must be shaped with them. The denial of dignity is not a transgender issue—it is a national issue of justice, equality, and democratic maturity. India’s claim to global leadership will remain hollow until all its citizens, regardless of gender identity, can live with dignity.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2019] Development and welfare schemes for the vulnerable, by its nature, are discriminatory in approach.” Do you agree? Give reasons for your answer.

    Linkage: This article’s critique of hollow quotas and tokenistic welfare for transgender persons directly links to the PYQ by showing how schemes meant for the vulnerable, instead of empowering, often reinforce exclusion and discrimination.

  • The Hard Truth About Out-of-Pocket Health Expenditure

    Introduction

    In India, healthcare financing is still heavily dependent on households directly paying for medical services. This out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE) often pushes families into a vicious cycle of poverty and ill-health. The National Health Accounts (NHA) claims that OOPE as a share of total health expenditure has sharply declined, from 64% in 2013-14 to 39% in 2021-22. On the surface, this appears to be a major policy success. However, a closer look suggests that these numbers may be misleading, as they rely heavily on a single survey base (NSS 75th round, 2017-18) and ignore the lived realities of health shocks, especially during COVID-19.

    Is OOPE in India Really Declining?

    1. NHA estimates: Show a steep decline in OOPE—from 64% in 2013-14 to 49% in 2017-18, and further to 39% in 2021-22.
    2. Basis of estimation: The 2017-18 NSS (75th round) forms the primary source, with later estimates extrapolated only for inflation.
    3. Question of accuracy: The decline may be linked to lower ailment reporting and reduced hospitalisation, not to falling medical costs.

    How Do Other Data Sources Contradict NHA?

    1. Consumer Expenditure Survey (CES) 2022-23: OOPE as share of household consumption rose—from 5.5% to 5.9% in rural areas and 6.9% to 7.1% in urban areas (2011-12 to 2022-23).
    2. Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI): Shows higher hospitalisation rates among the elderly, contrary to NSS-based decline.
    3. CPHS-CMIE Data: Reveals a V-shaped trend—steep fall in OOPE during COVID-19 due to under-utilisation, followed by a sharp rise. The NHA completely misses this fluctuation.
    4. National Income Accounts (NIA): Estimates show a steady rise in household health spending as a share of GDP, contradicting the NHA’s declining trend.

    Why Are NHA Estimates Considered Flawed?

    1. Single-source dependency: NHA depends mainly on the NSS morbidity survey, which underreports ailments.
    2. Exclusion of COVID-19 impact: No NSS data during the pandemic, leading to an unrealistic secular decline in NHA series.
    3. Ignoring insurance and premiums: Even after including premiums, NHA still shows a steep, unexplained fall in OOPE.
    4. Political convenience: Numbers risk being used for policy propaganda without reflecting ground-level hardship.

    What Are the Real Consequences of High OOPE?

    1. Poverty trap: Families borrow, sell assets, or cut consumption, leading to intergenerational poverty.
    2. Social impacts: Children drop out of school, women work longer hours, households skip meals.
    3. Rising health costs: Medicine prices and private care charges continue to rise, eroding household savings.
    4. COVID-19 experience: Families suffered catastrophic costs, which remain invisible in official accounts.

    What Is the Way Forward?

    1. Diversified data sources: Use CES, LASI, CMIE, NFHS, and private medical sales databases alongside NSS.
    2. Regular, timely surveys: Health rounds of NSS must be more frequent to capture shocks like pandemics.
    3. Integration with NIA: Align NHA estimates with National Income Accounts for consistency.
    4. Transparent policymaking: Avoid over-reliance on selective data that paints a rosy picture.

    Conclusion

    The debate over out-of-pocket health expenditure in India highlights the gulf between official statistics and lived realities. While the National Health Accounts show a sharp decline in OOPE, independent surveys and household-level data point towards rising medical costs and deepening financial distress. Over-reliance on a single survey base not only distorts the picture but also risks misleading health policy. For a country aspiring to achieve Universal Health Coverage, credible, diversified, and transparent data must form the backbone of decision-making. Without this, India risks celebrating statistical success while millions continue to be pushed into poverty and ill-health by catastrophic healthcare expenses.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2021] Besides being a moral imperative of a Welfare State, primary health structure is a necessary precondition for sustainable development. Analyse.

    Linkage: The persistence of high out-of-pocket health expenditure (OOPE) despite claims of decline shows the weakness of India’s primary health structure, as families still bear catastrophic costs. A robust primary health system would reduce dependence on expensive hospitalisation and prevent poverty traps. Thus, strengthening primary health care is not just a welfare obligation, but essential for achieving sustainable and inclusive development.

  • [pib] Swasth Nari, Sashakt Parivar Abhiyaan (SNSPA)

    Why in the News?

    Prime Minister has launched the Swasth Nari, Sashakt Parivar Abhiyaan (SNSPA) alongside the 8th Rashtriya Poshan Maah.

    [pib] Swasth Nari, Sashakt Parivar Abhiyaan (SNSPA)

    About Swasth Nari, Sashakt Parivar Abhiyaan (SNSPA):

    • Launch: Introduced on 17 September 2025 by the PM, jointly led by Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and the Ministry of Women and Child Development.
    • Objective: Strengthen women’s, children’s, and family health services, focusing on rural, tribal, and underserved regions.
    • Scale: Over 10 lakh health camps at Ayushman Arogya Mandirs, Community Health Centres (CHCs), and District Hospitals.
    • Screenings: Anaemia, hypertension, diabetes, TB, breast and cervical cancers, sickle cell disease, reproductive health conditions.
    • Services offered: Maternal, child, adolescent health including antenatal care, immunisation, nutrition counselling, menstrual hygiene, mental health, lifestyle awareness.
    • Digital Monitoring: SASHAKT portal ensures real-time data tracking and transparency.
    • Jan Bhagidaari: Collaboration with private hospitals, SHGs, Anganwadis, Panchayati Raj institutions, volunteers.
    • Tribal Focus: Specialised medical services and tailored counselling for remote and tribal areas.

    What is Rashtriya Poshan Maah?

    • Overview: Part of POSHAN Abhiyaan (National Nutrition Mission); celebrated annually since 2018.
    • 2025 Edition: 8th Poshan Maah, aligned with SNSPA for synergised impact.
    • Aim: Mobilise communities to improve nutrition of children, pregnant women, lactating mothers, and adolescent girls.
    • Activities: Poshan Panchayats, health and nutrition camps, recipe demos, rallies, school-Anganwadi outreach, Jan Andolan approach.
    • Focus Areas (2025):
      • Anaemia Mukt Bharat and micronutrient awareness.
      • Complementary feeding practices for infants and toddlers.
      • Poshan-Vatika (nutri-gardens) for food security.
      • Promotion of traditional and regional diets for sustainable nutrition.
    [UPSC 2024] With reference to the ‘Pradhan Mantri Surakshit Matritva Abhiyan’, consider the following statements:

    1. This scheme guarantees a minimum package of antenatal care services to women in their second and third trimesters of pregnancy and six months post-delivery health care service in any government health facility.

    2. Under this scheme, private sector health care providers of certain specialities can volunteer to provide services at nearby government health facilities.

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    Options: (a) 1 only (b) 2 only* (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2

     

  • [16th September 2025] The Hindu Op-ed: Court’s nod to Mental Health as Right

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2020] In order to enhance the prospects of social development, sound and adequate health care policies are needed in the fields of geriatric and maternal health care. Discuss.

    Linkage: The 2025 Sukdeb Saha judgment extends the scope of Article 21 by making mental health a constitutional right, just as geriatric and maternal health are essential to social development. Both contexts highlight the need for sound, inclusive health policies that address neglected yet critical areas. The ruling reinforces the argument that without adequate mental healthcare, broader social development goals remain incomplete.

    Mentor’s Comment

    The recent Supreme Court judgment in Sukdeb Saha vs State of Andhra Pradesh (2025) has elevated mental health to the level of a constitutional right under Article 21. More than a verdict on an individual tragedy, it has emerged as a landmark with systemic implications, redefining how student suicides, institutional neglect, and structural victimisation are understood in India. This article dissects the judgment, its social, legal, and criminological dimensions, and its significance for UPSC aspirants.

    Introduction

    In July 2025, the Supreme Court of India declared mental health to be an integral part of the right to life under Article 21. Triggered by the tragic suicide of a 17-year-old NEET aspirant in Visakhapatnam, the case (Sukdeb Saha vs State of Andhra Pradesh) transcended individual loss to expose the systemic failures of India’s education ecosystem. For the first time, the Court explicitly linked student suicides with institutional neglect and structural violence, framing mental health as a public injustice rather than a private bereavement. This landmark ruling has far-reaching implications for governance, education, victimology, and social justice.

    Why is the Judgment in the News?

    The verdict is a constitutional milestone because it:

    1. Recognises mental health as a fundamental right under Article 21, not just a statutory right under the Mental Healthcare Act 2017.
    2. Issues binding Saha Guidelines mandating schools, colleges, hostels, and coaching institutes to proactively create mental health support systems.
    3. Shifts accountability from individual students to institutions, framing neglect as a form of structural violence.
    4. Addresses India’s alarming student suicide epidemic, exposing deep systemic and cultural failures.
    5. This is the first time the Court has extended the doctrine of state responsibility to mental well-being, making it a case of historic significance.

    How does the case highlight structural victimisation?

    1. Structural neglect: Education systems, coaching centres, and hostels create conditions of high pressure with little support, making students vulnerable.
    2. State complicity: By failing to provide safeguards, institutions and the state become indirect perpetrators of harm.
    3. Victimology lens: Students are not merely individuals battling internal struggles; they are victims of systemic injustice and exploitative cultures.

    Why does the verdict matter legally?

    1. Constitutional elevation: Mental health is no longer a mere statutory right but a fundamental right under Article 21.
    2. Gap filling: The Mental Healthcare Act 2017 remains poorly enforced; the judgment provides a stronger normative benchmark.
    3. Legislative force: The Saha Guidelines have the same weight as law until Parliament enacts a mental health code.

    What are the “Saha Guidelines”?

    1. Institutional responsibility: Schools, colleges, hostels, and coaching institutes must establish mental health support systems.
    2. Time-bound compliance: States and UTs must frame rules within two months.
    3. Monitoring mechanisms: Creation of district-level monitoring committees for accountability.
    4. Binding nature: These interim orders have legislative effect until codified.

    Can student suicides be seen as structural violence?

    1. Galtung’s theory: Structural violence occurs when societal structures systematically deprive individuals of basic needs.
    2. Application: Educational institutions that ignore psychological well-being indirectly inflict harm.
    3. Reframing suicides: Shifts the discourse from “personal failures” to systemic injustice requiring state intervention.

    What are the challenges in implementation?

    1. Institutional inertia: Schools and coaching centres often resist reform.
    2. Resource constraints: Lack of trained mental health professionals in India.
    3. Cultural barriers: Persistent stigma around psychological counselling.
    4. State responsibility: The verdict’s success depends on political will, monitoring, and investment in mental health infrastructure.

    Conclusion

    The Sukdeb Saha judgment is a watershed moment in constitutional jurisprudence. By recognising mental health as a core aspect of the right to life, it challenges society to confront uncomfortable truths about neglect, exploitation, and indifference in the education system. Yet, the ruling’s legacy will depend on whether the Saha Guidelines are translated into action or remain judicial rhetoric. For students, too often silenced by despair, this judgment is a promise of dignity, recognition, and justice.

  • 20 Years of MGNREGS

    Why in the News?

    On the 20th anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, 2005, concerns were raised over chronic underfunding of the scheme during the past decade.

    About MGNREGS:

    • Overview: MGNREGS is a rights-based Centrally Sponsored Scheme launched under the MGNREGA Act of 2005 to ensure the Right to Work for rural households.
    • Origins:
      • The idea of employment guarantee in India began with Maharashtra’s pilot, Employment Guarantee Scheme (MEGS), in 1965 under the Vasantrao Naik government.
      • At the national level, the idea was first proposed in 1991 by then PM P. V. Narasimha Rao and later enacted in 2005.
    • Employment Guarantee: It provides 100 days of wage employment per year to any adult willing to do unskilled manual labour in rural India.
    • Legal Obligation: It is the first law in India that imposes a legal duty on the government to provide employment and compensate for non-compliance.
    • Development Goal: The scheme aims to promote livelihood security, inclusive growth, and rural development.

    Key Features:

    • Statutory Right: Employment under MGNREGS is a legal entitlement, not just a welfare scheme.
    • Eligibility: Any rural adult aged 18 or above can apply and must be offered work within 15 days.
    • Proximity and Wages: Work must be provided within 5 km of the applicant’s residence with minimum wage, and delays attract compensation.
    • Unemployment Allowance: If work is not provided on time, the state must pay an allowance.
    • Demand-Driven Model: The scheme is worker-initiated, requiring the government to respond to demand.
    • Transparency and Audits: Regular social audits and online updates ensure accountability in job cards, muster rolls, and fund use.
    • Local Implementation: It is decentralised, led by Gram Panchayats, with support from block and state officials, and centrally funded.
    • Women’s Inclusion: At least one-third of beneficiaries must be women, enhancing gender equity.
    • Sustainable Assets: Projects focus on durable rural infrastructure like ponds, roads, canals, and plantations.
    [UPSC 2006] Consider the following statements in respect of the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, 2005:

    1. The Act provides 100 days of employment to households as a fundamental right.

    2. Women are given priority such that half of the employment seekers are women.

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    Options: (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2 *