Why in the News?
The tragic crash of Air India flight AI171 in Ahmedabad on June 12, 2025, which killed over 300 people, is a shocking reminder of how poor aviation safety is in India. This is not a one-time event, but part of a long series of deadly air accidents over the years that show serious problems in the system.
What governance failures led to the AI171 crash?
- Lack of Regulatory Oversight: Authorities like the DGCA and MoCA failed to enforce basic safety measures, such as proper runway maintenanceand bird hazard management. Eg: Overgrown grass near the runway in Ahmedabad attracted birds, possibly causing engine failure due to bird ingestion.
- Failure to Act on Past Warnings: Despite repeated aviation accidents over decades, systemic safety reforms were not implemented, and accountabilitywas routinely evaded. Eg: After major crashes like Mangaluru (2010) and Kozhikode (2020), safety lapses were identified but ignored by aviation authorities.
- Politicisation and Poor Leadership Appointments: Key aviation bodies were headed by bureaucrats or politically appointed officials lacking technical expertise in aviation safety. Eg: Professionals were bypassed in favour of public-relations-focused appointees at DGCA and AAI, weakening institutional response to risks.
Why is DGCA under criticism post-AI171 incident?
- Lack of Regulatory Oversight: Authorities like the DGCA and MoCA failed to enforce basic safety measures, such as proper runway maintenanceand bird hazard management. Eg: Overgrown grass near the runway in Ahmedabad attracted birds, possibly causing engine failure due to bird ingestion.
- Failure to Act on Past Warnings: Despite repeated aviation accidents over decades, systemic safety reforms were not implemented, and accountabilitywas routinely evaded. Eg: After major crashes like Mangaluru (2010) and Kozhikode (2020), safety lapses were identified but ignored by aviation authorities.
- Politicisation and Poor Leadership Appointments: Key aviation bodies were headed by bureaucrats or politically appointed officials lacking technical expertise in aviation safety. Eg: Professionals were bypassed in favour of public-relations-focused appointees at DGCA and AAI, weakening institutional response to risks.
How does a lack of accountability affect aviation safety in India?
- Recurring Accidents without Systemic Change: When no one is held responsible, critical safety lapses continue unchecked across the aviation sector. Eg: Despite the Mangaluru (2010) and Kozhikode (2020) crashes, Air India and regulators did not implement robust safety reforms.
- Blame Shift to Pilots: Authorities often scapegoat pilots instead of addressing deeper infrastructure and regulatory issues, undermining fair investigations. Eg: In the AI171 crash, DGCA named the pilots publicly, violating ICAO norms, instead of probing systemic failings.
- No Judicial Enforcement of Reforms: Weak legal follow-up allows ministries and aviation bodies to evade reforms even after Public Interest Litigations or inquiries. Eg: After the Mangaluru crash, a PIL listing DGCA and MoCA violations was dismissed by the Supreme Court, citing procedural grounds.
Which global aviation norms were violated in this crash’s aftermath?
|
What reforms are needed to strengthen aviation safety oversight? (Way forward)
- Professionalisation of Regulatory Bodies: Appoint trained aviation professionals—not bureaucrats—to head institutions like the DGCA and AAI for evidence-based decision-making and technical leadership. Eg: ICAO recommends that civil aviation authorities be led by aviation experts to ensure technical integrity.
- Independent and Transparent Accident Investigations: Create an autonomous investigation body separate from the Ministry of Civil Aviation to probe accidents, publish findings without interference, and fix systemic gaps. Eg: The U.S. NTSB operates independently of the FAA and reports directly to Congress, ensuring accountability.
- Enforcement of International Standards: Enforce strict compliance with ICAO safety protocols, such as restricting construction near flight paths and maintaining airport surroundings. Eg: The presence of a high-rise building in AI171’s flight path violated ICAO’s obstacle clearance norms.
Mains PYQ:
[UPSC 2014] “International civil aviation laws provide all countries complete and exclusive sovereignty over the airspace above the territory. What do you understand by airspace? What are the implications of these laws on the space above this airspace? Discuss the challenges which this poses and suggests ways to contain the threat.
Linkage: “International civil aviation laws” and “airspace”, which are fundamental legal and operational aspects governing the aviation sector. In this article talks about the violations of “International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) standards” in India’s aviation system, underscoring the importance of understanding the legal and regulatory framework of the aviation sector.
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024
