Why in the News?
Justice M.M. Sundresh of the Supreme Court remarked that the time has come to decriminalise defamation, reflecting concern over its growing misuse.
Free Speech and Defamation: Constitutional Provisions
|
What is Criminal Defamation?
- Overview: Offence of harming a personâs character, fame, or reputation with false and malicious statements.
-
Forms:
-
- Libel: False defamatory statement in writing.
- Slander: False defamatory statement spoken orally.
- Indian Context: Both libel & slander are criminal offences if made publicly.
- Earlier IPC Section 499: Criminalised communication of false info harming reputation; punishment under IPC Section 500 â up to 2 years imprisonment.
-
Law under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023:
- Section 354(2) â punishment up to 2 years simple imprisonment, or fine, or both, or community service.
- Section 356 â covers words, signs, or visible representations harming reputation.
- Scope: Applies to individuals, companies, and deceased persons if family reputation is harmed.
- Essential Elements: False statement, harm to reputation, communication to third party, and intent/knowledge of likely harm.
- Nature of Offence: Non-cognizable and bailable â requires a warrant for arrest; bail available.
- Digital Extension: Covers defamatory posts on social media, websites, and messaging platforms.
- Defences/Exceptions: Truth in public interest, fair comment on public servants, judicial proceedings, public performances, and cautionary statements made in good faith.
Judicial Pronouncements related to Defamation:
- Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India (2016): SC upheld constitutionality of IPC Sections 499 & 500; held that reputation is part of Article 21; criminal defamation valid under Article 19(2) restrictions.
- Kaushal Kishore v. Union of India (2017): SC held no extra restrictions on free speech beyond Article 19(2).
- Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015): SC struck down Section 66A of IT Act, calling it vague and violative of free speech.
- Imran Pratapgarhi Case (March 2025): Court adopted the âreasonable personâ test (Clapham omnibus standard), not that of overly sensitive individuals.
- Recent Stays: SC stayed multiple cases (incl. against Rahul Gandhi and Shashi Tharoor) stressing courts should not be tools for political vendetta.
[UPSC 2014] What do you understand by the concept of âfreedom of speech and expressionâ? Does it cover hate speech also? Why do the films in India stand on a slightly different plane from other forms of expression? Discuss.
[UPSC 2021] âRight to Privacyâ is protected under which Article of the Constitution of India? Options: (a) Article 15 (b) Article 19 (c) Article 21 * (d) Article 29 |
Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024