💥UPSC 2026, 2027 UAP Mentorship November Batch

Telecom and Postal Sector – Spectrum Allocation, Call Drops, Predatory Pricing, etc

What is Adjusted Gross Revenue (AGR)?

Why in the News?

The Supreme Court has allowed the Union Government to reconsider its additional Adjusted Gross Revenue (AGR) dues from Vodafone-Idea for FY 2016–17, giving relief to the debt-ridden telecom firm.

About Adjusted Gross Revenue (AGR):

  • Overview: AGR is the revenue base used by the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) to calculate license fees and spectrum usage charges (SUC) owed by telecom operators.
  • Origin: Introduced under the National Telecom Policy, 1999, AGR represents a share of total earnings payable by service providers to the government.
  • DoT’s Interpretation: Encompasses all revenues, both core telecom (e.g., call, SMS, data) and non-telecom (e.g., interest, rent, capital gains, dividends).
  • Telecom Operators’ View: Contended that AGR should cover only core operational revenues, excluding non-telecom income unrelated to telecom services.
  • Components (as upheld by the Supreme Court, 2019):
    • Included: Call charges, data usage, roaming/interconnection fees, value-added services, interest, rent, and forex gains.
    • Excluded: Goods and Services Tax (GST) and revenue already shared with other operators.
  • Financial Fallout: The 2019 verdict imposed ₹1.47 lakh crore in retrospective dues, triggering a liquidity crisis and sectoral consolidation.
  • Current Context (2025): The Supreme Court has permitted policy reconsideration of excess AGR demands, signalling a more flexible, reform-oriented telecom regime.

What is the AGR Dispute?

  • Legal Conflict:  between telecom operators and the DoT on the scope of “gross revenue” used for fee computation.
  • Operators’ Argument: Only telecom-related income, from calls, SMS, and internet, should form part of AGR.
  • DoT’s Position: AGR must also include non-core revenues, expanding liability through inclusion of financial and ancillary income.
  • Supreme Court Ruling (2019): Upheld DoT’s broad definition, mandating payment of full dues with interest, penalty, and interest on penalty.
  • Sectoral Consequence: The judgment destabilised telecom finances, leading to the exit of smaller players and near-duopoly between Reliance Jio and Bharti Airtel.
  • Vodafone-Idea Case: With dues over ₹58,000 crore, Vi became the worst-hit; the government later converted part of its dues into equity, acquiring a 49% stake to prevent insolvency.
  • Policy Evolution: AGR, once a litigation issue, now reflects a governance reform debate, balancing fiscal interests, sector viability, and consumer protection within India’s telecom ecosystem.

 

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

JOIN THE COMMUNITY

Join us across Social Media platforms.