Why This?
Governments are undermining the RTI Act by delaying the appointment of information commissioners, causing commissions to struggle with increasing backlogs, according to a 2023-24 report of Satark Nagrik Sangathan. This makes the topic important from the Governance point of view. Thus, knowing about the challenges in the implementation of RTI is important. But since RTI overlaps with multiple parts of the 4 GS papers, it is important to know the entire chain of ISSUE – SUBSTANTIATION-IMPACT for each challenge. This would make your prep for the topic conceptually strong.
GS1 – Indian Society: Role of Women, Urbanization, and Social Empowerment
Note4Students: Understand the role of RTI in promoting social accountability and the empowerment of marginalized communities. Study how RTI enables civil society to play an active role in strengthening democratic participation and social empowerment.
Microthemes: Social Empowerment, Government Programmes
GS2 – Important aspects of Governance, Transparency, and Accountability, Separation of powers
Note4Students: Strengthen your understanding of RTI as a tool for ensuring transparency and good governance. Link the impact of RTI amendments and judicial rulings to arguments for protecting democratic accountability in India.
Microthemes: Transparency and accountability
GS3 – Internal Security and Role of Non-state Actors in creating challenges to internal security
Note4Students: Explore how the protection of RTI activists relates to maintaining internal security and preventing governance abuses. Analyze how threats to RTI users affect civic activism and transparency in India.
Microthemes: Threat from external state or non-state actors,
GS4 – Ethics in Governance: Accountability and Ethical Governance
Note4Students: Enhance your understanding of ethical governance through case studies on RTI. Examine the balance between transparency, privacy, and ethical challenges in governance systems.
Microthemes: Quality of service delivery, Information sharing and transparency in Government X RTI
The Right to Information empowers citizens in a democratic state by providing unhindered access to information about government functions across the legislative, executive, and judiciary. This right transforms individuals from passive subjects to active citizens in governance.
What is the Right to Information?
The Right to Information ensures that the public can access information about government functioning, promoting citizen engagement and accountability.
Philosophical Basis of Right to Information
The philosophical foundation of the Right to Information can be traced back to Aristotle’s ideas, linking Democracy’s core values—Liberty and Equality—with citizens’ right to know about governmental functions. Access to information shapes personal, social, political, and economic identity and capabilities.
Recognition in International Law
- United Nations (UN): In 1946, the UN General Assembly recognized Freedom of Information as a fundamental human right and essential for all other freedoms.
- International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR): Article 19 of the ICCPR enshrines the right to access information, establishing it as a legal obligation in international human rights law.
History of Constitutional Recognition in India
The Indian Constitution does not explicitly mention RTI as a fundamental right, but the Supreme Court has interpreted it as an extension of Article 19(1)(a) (freedom of speech and expression) and connected it to Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty).
- State of U.P. v Raj Narain (1975): SC declared that RTI is implicit in the right to freedom of speech and expression.
- S.P. Gupta v. President of India (1982): SC supported citizens’ right to know public actions and decisions by public functionaries.
- People’s Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India: SC elevated RTI as a human right tied to Article 21.
Legislative Recognition
The Right to Information Act (RTI Act) was enacted in 2005 after strong advocacy from civil society groups like Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan and judicial support for transparency. The RTI Act aims to ensure transparency, accountability, and public access to information.
Significance of Right to Information
- Exposing Corruption: RTI reveals corruption, nepotism, and favoritism (e.g., CWG scam, coal allocation scam).
- Transparency in Executive Functions: Increases government department transparency (e.g., Public Distribution System in UP).
- Strengthening Democracy: Empowers citizens to question the government, reinforcing democratic engagement.
- Shift in Government Work Culture: Fosters a culture of openness and record-keeping in government offices.
- Judiciary’s Role: Empowers the judiciary to nullify laws promoting secrecy (e.g., ruling on the Electoral Bonds scheme).
The Issue-Impact Conundrum
While the Right to Information (RTI) Act has been a vital tool for transparency and accountability, its effectiveness is being undermined by several challenges. The following table offers a clear framework that can be used to enrich answers with facts and data.
Issue | SUBSTANTIATION | Impact |
Vacant Posts in Information Commissions | Many information commissions have unfilled vacancies. For example, the Central Information Commission has 8 out of 11 positions vacant. States like Jharkhand, Tripura, and Telangana have had defunct commissions for years. | Severe disruption of RTI functioning; delays in case processing. |
Mounting Backlogs | Due to insufficient information commissioners, there are over 4 lakh pending appeals and complaints. In states like Chhattisgarh and Bihar, fresh appeals may not be resolved until 2029. | Long delays in justice; citizens lose trust in RTI’s effectiveness. |
Bias in Appointments | Many commissioners appointed are retired government officials or have political affiliations, leading to reluctance in taking action against transparency violations. | Erodes public trust and reduces the effectiveness of the RTI Act. |
Failure to Impose Penalties | Information commissions impose penalties in only 5% of applicable cases, leading to a culture of impunity among officials. | Discourages adherence to RTI; promotes violations without accountability. |
Regressive Amendments | The 2019 RTI Amendment Act reduced the autonomy of information commissions by granting the central government control over commissioners’ tenure, salaries, and entitlements. The 2023 Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act further restricted disclosure of personal information under RTI. | Undermines the independence of the RTI Act; limits transparency. |
Threats and Attacks on RTI Activists | Nearly 100 killings and thousands of cases of assault, intimidation, and legal harassment have been reported against individuals using the RTI Act. | Creates fear, discouraging the public from using RTI to expose corruption. |
Way Forward
- Judicial Reaffirmation: The Supreme Court should reaffirm RTI as essential to democracy, especially in cases like electoral bonds.
- Language Accessibility: RTI information should be accessible in regional languages.
- RTI Education: The right to know should be included in school curricula to cultivate vigilant citizens.
- Inclusion of Political Parties: Parliament should consider extending RTI to cover political parties for better democratic accountability.
#BACK2BASICS
The lesser talked-about side : How RTI has ushered in an era of transparency ?
The RTI has reinforced democratic participation by transforming citizens from passive recipients of information to active stakeholders in governance.
Key Contribution | Description | Example |
Exposing Corruption and Malpractices | RTI has been instrumental in revealing large-scale corruption and misuse of resources. | RTI inquiries uncovered the Commonwealth Games scam and coal allocation scam, leading to public outcry and investigations. |
Enhancing Transparency in Government Functions | RTI requests have led to greater openness in government departments and more accurate record-keeping. | In Uttar Pradesh, RTI applications revealed inefficiencies in the Public Distribution System, prompting improvements in food distribution. |
Promoting Citizen Engagement in Democracy | RTI empowers citizens to ask questions, seek accountability, and participate more actively in governance. | Citizens used RTI to expose irregularities in local development projects, such as incomplete road constructions and school funding misuse. |
Shift in Governmental Work Culture | RTI has encouraged transparency and accountability within government offices, fostering a more open work environment. | Improved record maintenance and timely data responses in various departments due to RTI requests, making public records more accessible. |
Judicial Support for Transparency | RTI aids the judiciary in challenging laws that promote secrecy or infringe upon fundamental rights. | In cases like the Electoral Bonds scheme, RTI-backed transparency arguments contributed to the judicial review of laws affecting public accountability. |