💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (August Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

GS Paper: Executive & Judiciary

  • Deconstructing Gender Stereotypes: The Supreme Court’s Handbook

    gender

    Central Idea

    • The Supreme Court of India has taken a significant step to challenge outdated ideas, especially those affecting women, by releasing a special guide.
    • This guide introduces new words for lawyers and judges to use in court, aiming to fight harmful beliefs.

    Handbook on Combating Gender Stereotypes

    • The handbook provides a list of biased words and suggests better alternatives for legal documents.
    • Its main aim is to provide legal experts with the means to “identify, understand, and challenge stereotypes about women.”
    • It includes a list of terms that promote gender bias and offers alternative, fairer terms to be used in legal documents.

    Objective and Scope of the Handbook

    • Challenging Old Beliefs: The Supreme Court’s initiative aims to discard old-fashioned and harmful stereotypes, particularly those related to women, through the ‘Handbook on Combating Gender Stereotypes.’
    • CJI’s Vision: The handbook is introduced by Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, who explains its purpose: to help legal professionals recognize and counter gender-based stereotypes.
    • Language Transformation: The handbook includes a glossary of terms that contribute to gender bias and suggests better alternatives to be used in legal writings.

    Why such a move?

    [A] Language inflicting Stereotypes

    • The handbook points out terms in legal language that promote gender bias and provides suggestions for change.
    • Examples of Change: Instead of using “adulteress,” the handbook recommends using “Woman who has engaged in sexual relations outside of marriage” to avoid disrespectful language.
    • Removing Biases: The handbook encourages using simple terms like “woman” and “wife” instead of prefixes like “chaste” or “obedient.”
    • Using Neutral Language: Instead of negatively using “effeminate,” the handbook suggests using neutral terms like “confident” or “responsible.”

    [B] Avoiding labelling

    • Empowering Language: The handbook suggests using “survivor” or “victim” to describe individuals affected by sexual violence.
    • Respecting Preferences: The choice between “survivor” and “victim” should be based on the individual’s preference.

    [C] Conscious Reporting of Cases

    • Separating Attire and Consent: The handbook emphasizes that a person’s clothing should never excuse unwanted touching; consent remains essential.
    • Breaking Stereotypes: The handbook rejects the idea that delayed reporting of sexual assault means it didn’t happen.
    • Encouraging Reporting: The handbook acknowledges the bravery required to report sexual offenses due to societal pressures.

    Negative Effects of Gender Stereotypes

    • Widespread Impact: Gender stereotypes lead to exclusion and prejudice in workplaces, schools, and public places.
    • Education Example: The handbook illustrates how stereotypes affect students from marginalized communities, adding stress during exams.
    • Government Data: Minister Subhas Sarkar’s data on dropout rates among marginalized students is shared as an example.

    Legal reforms rebutting Gender Stereotypes

    • Cases for Equality: The Supreme Court points out cases that reject stereotypes, like Joseph Shine vs. Union of India, which struck down the “adultery” law.
    • Example Rulings: The court’s decisions in cases like the State of Jharkhand vs. Shailendra Kumar Rai and the State of Punjab vs. Gurmit Singh are explained.

    Conclusion

    • By offering alternatives to outdated and biased language, the handbook aims not only to reshape legal discussions but also societal viewpoints.
    • Its potential impact is anticipated to extend beyond legal matters, influencing everyday perspectives and contributing to a more equitable society.

  • Debate around Article 370 in Supreme Court

    article 370

    Central Idea

    • There are ongoing Supreme Court deliberations regarding the abrogation of Article 370.
    • This article delves into the historical context, legal intricacies, and broader socio-political implications of this pivotal constitutional provision.

    Historical Context of Accession

    • Geo-Political Situation: Jammu and Kashmir’s unique special status originated from the tumultuous geo-political circumstances following India’s Independence and Partition.
    • Standstill Agreements: Maharaja Hari Singh’s decision to enter into “Standstill Agreements” with both India and Pakistan highlighted the State’s strategic positioning and economic interests.
    • Instrument of Accession: Faced with internal turmoil and external aggression, Maharaja Hari Singh’s Instrument of Accession sought India’s military assistance while retaining significant autonomy in internal matters.

    Evolution of Article 370

    • Instrument of Accession’s Reflection: Article 370 was crafted in line with the Instrument of Accession’s principles, preserving the unique terms of Jammu and Kashmir’s association with India.
    • Autonomy Preserved: This provision aimed to strike a balance between safeguarding the State’s autonomy and integrating it into the larger Indian Union.
    • Limited Legislative Authority: Article 370 outlined a limited scope for Parliament to legislate on certain subjects, primarily defense, foreign affairs, and communications, with consultation and concurrence requirements.
    • Special Relationship: This provision established Jammu and Kashmir’s distinct relationship with India, emphasizing that its integration would be contingent on mutual consent.

    Abrogation of Article 370

    • Long-Standing Opposition: The abrogation of Article 370 was a persistent demand of the mainstream political party and its precursor.
    • Multistage Process: The process of abrogation involved presidential orders, amendments, and parliamentary resolutions, culminating in its nullification.

    Petitioners’ Arguments against Revocation

    • Lack of Consultation: Senior litigant accused the Union government of ignoring the will of the people of Jammu and Kashmir during the Article 370 abrogation process.
    • Series of Executive Acts: He highlighted that the abrogation was executed through a series of executive acts, starting from the dissolution of the Jammu and Kashmir Legislative Assembly and state government.
    • Changing Provisions: He pointed out that the proviso to Article 370 (3) was altered to sidestep the need for the recommendation of the now-defunct Jammu and Kashmir Constituent Assembly before rendering Article 370 inoperative.

    Nature of Relationship

    • Federal vs. Quasi-Federal: Litigant underscored that the relationship between the Union government and Jammu and Kashmir was purely federal, distinct from other states’ quasi-federal relationships.
    • Consent of the State: He argued that such significant decisions should have required the consent of the state and its people, considering the unique federal structure.

    CJI’s Inquiries

    • Permanent Character of Article 370: The CJI raised a significant question about the permanence of Article 370 in the Constitution. He inquired whether a constitutional amendment was required to transform its temporary nature into permanence.
    • Jammu and Kashmir Constituent Assembly: He asked whether the absence of abrogation by the Jammu and Kashmir Constituent Assembly before its dissolution in 1957 should be considered as deeming Article 370 permanent.

    Supreme Court’s Interpretation

    Ans. No Comparison with Brexit-Type Referendum

    • Brexit Referendum: The CJI referenced the Brexit referendum as a political decision taken in the U.K. which does not align with India’s constitutional framework.
    • Uniqueness of Constitutional Democracy: India’s democracy is grounded in the Constitution, and thus decisions like Article 370’s abrogation involve adherence to established legal procedures.

    Conclusion

    • The ongoing courtroom exchange underlines the essence of constitutional democracy in India, wherein the expression of public opinion occurs through established democratic mechanisms.
    • The Chief Justice’s observations and the petitioners’ arguments shed light on the intricate balance between executive actions, parliamentary representation, and the preservation of constitutional principles.

  • Language Complexity in India’s Judiciary

    Central Idea

    • The Supreme Court rejected a plea to transfer a motor accident case from the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) in Farrukhabad, UP, to the MACT in Darjeeling, West Bengal.
    • The court emphasized that language should not be a barrier, and witnesses should communicate in Hindi, the national language, during proceedings

    Why discuss this?

    • The Supreme Court’s assertion that Hindi is the national language sparked debates, given India’s linguistic diversity.
    • While no language is officially designated as the “national language,” Hindi holds a significant position as the official language of the Union.

    Official Languages and the Constitution

    • Article 343: The Constitution designates Hindi in the Devanagari script as the official language of the Union, with English used for official purposes during the initial 15 years after the Constitution’s commencement in 1950.
    • Article 351: The Constitution directs the Union to promote the spread of Hindi while respecting the forms and expressions of other languages listed in the Eighth Schedule.

    Eighth Schedule and Linguistic Diversity

    • Eighth Schedule: The Constitution’s Eighth Schedule lists 22 languages, including Hindi, Bengali, Punjabi, Tamil, Telugu, and Urdu, as recognized languages. The Schedule has expanded over time to accommodate languages like Bodo, Dogri, Maithili, and Santhali.
    • Demands for Inclusion: Various languages such as Bhojpuri, Garhwali (Pahari), and Rajasthani are vying for inclusion in the Eighth Schedule. The MHA acknowledges the dynamic nature of language evolution but faces challenges in establishing criteria for inclusion.
    • Official Languages Act, 1963: Despite Hindi being an official language, the Act ensures the continuation of English for official purposes even beyond the initial 15-year period.

    Status of English in Judiciary

    • Apex Courts: The use of English is mandated in proceedings of the Supreme Court and High Courts, ensuring uniformity in legal communication. The Rajasthan High Court introduced Hindi for court proceedings, citing Article 348 (2) and the Official Languages Act.
    • Subordinate Courts and Regional Languages:
    1. Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC): The State Government has the authority to determine the language of subordinate courts within the state.
    2. Code of Civil Procedure (CPC): While the language of subordinate courts is initially maintained, the State Government can declare a language and character for applications and proceedings.

    Way Forward

    • Balancing Diversity and Accessibility: The debate on regional languages in courts underscores the need to make legal proceedings accessible to all citizens, considering linguistic diversity.
    • Gradual Transition: While the use of regional languages in courts is a growing conversation, any transition must be gradual and carefully implemented to ensure clarity and consistency.
    • Socio-Linguistic Dynamics: Encouraging the use of local languages in legal proceedings aligns with PM’s vision to facilitate understanding of the judicial process among citizens.

  • SC Collegium proposes new CJs to 7 High Courts

    collegium

    Central Idea

    • The Supreme Court Collegium, led by Chief Justice of India D. Y. Chandrachud, has recommended new Chief Justices for seven major High Courts in India.
    • The recommendations focus on criteria such as seniority, regional representation, and gender diversity.

    What is Collegium System?

    • The Collegium of judges is the Indian Supreme Court’s invention.
    • It does not figure in the Constitution, which says judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts are appointed by the President and speaks of a process of consultation.
    • In effect, it is a system under which judges are appointed by an institution comprising judges.
    • After some judges were superseded in the appointment of the CJI in the 1970s, and attempts made subsequently to effect a mass transfer of High Court judges across the country.
    • Hence there was a perception that the independence of the judiciary was under threat. This resulted in a series of cases over the years.

    Evolution: The Judges Cases

    • First Judges Case (1981) ruled that the “consultation” with the CJI in the matter of appointments must be full and effective.
    • However, it rejected the idea that the CJI’s opinion, albeit carrying great weight, should have primacy.
    • Second Judges Case (1993) introduced the Collegium system, holding that “consultation” really meant “concurrence”.
    • It added that it was not the CJI’s individual opinion, but an institutional opinion formed in consultation with the two senior-most judges in the Supreme Court.
    • Third Judges Case (1998): On a Presidential Reference for its opinion, the Supreme Court, in the Third Judges Case (1998) expanded the Collegium to a five-member body, comprising the CJI and four of his senior-most colleagues.

    Functions of the Collegium

    (1) Appointment of CJI

    • The President of India appoints the CJI and other Supreme Court judges.
    • The outgoing CJI recommends his successor, and the appointment is typically made based on seniority, following the controversy of the 1970s.
    • The Union Law Minister forwards the recommendation to the Prime Minister, who then advises the President on the appointment.

    (2) Appointment of Other SC Judges

    • The proposal for appointing other judges to the Supreme Court is initiated by the CJI.
    • The CJI consults other members of the Collegium, as well as the senior-most judge from the High Court to which the recommended person belongs.
    • The opinions of the consultees must be recorded in writing and included in the file.
    • The Collegium sends the recommendation to the Law Minister, who forwards it to the Prime Minister for the President’s advice.

    (3) Appointment of High Court Judges

    • Chief Justices (CJs) of High Courts are appointed based on the policy of having Chief Justices from outside the respective states. The Collegium makes the final decision on their elevation.
    • The appointment of High Court judges is recommended by a Collegium consisting of the CJI and two senior-most judges.
    • The Chief Justice of the High Court concerned initiates the proposal in consultation with two senior-most colleagues.
    • The recommendation is then sent to the Chief Minister, who advises the Governor to forward the proposal to the Union Law Minister.

    (4) Transfer Recommendations by the Collegium

    • The Collegium is also responsible for recommending transfers of Chief Justices and other judges.
    • Article 222 of the Constitution allows for the transfer of judges from one High Court to another.
    • When a Chief Justice is transferred, a replacement must be simultaneously appointed for the concerned High Court. An acting Chief Justice can be appointed for a maximum of one month.
    • In transfer matters, the CJI’s opinion is determinative, and the consent of the judge being transferred is not required.
    • However, the CJI should consider the views of the Chief Justice of the concerned High Court and one or more Supreme Court judges who are in a position to provide their opinions.
    • All transfers must be made in the public interest, aiming for the betterment of the administration of justice.

     

  • What is a Constitution Bench?

    Central Idea: A new Constitution Bench led by Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud is scheduled to start hearing a list of some cases from July 12.

    What is a Constitution Bench?

    • The constitution bench is the name given to the benches of the Supreme Court of India.
    • The Chief Justice of India has the power to constitute a Constitution Bench and refer cases to it.

    Constitution benches are set up when the following circumstances exist:

    1. Interpretation of the Constitution: Article 145(3) provides for the constitution of at least five judges of the court which sit to decide any case “involving a substantial question of law as to the interpretation” of the Constitution of India.
    2. President of India seeking SC’s opinion: When the President has sought the Supreme Court’s opinion on a question of fact or law under Article 143 of the Constitution. Article 143 of the Constitution provides for Advisory jurisdiction to the SC. As per the provision, the President has the power to address questions to the apex Court, which he deems important for public welfare.
    3. Conflicting Judgments: When two or more three-judge benches of the Supreme Court have delivered conflicting judgments on the same point of law, necessitating a definite understanding and interpretation of the law by a larger bench.
    • The Constitution benches are set up on ad hoc basis as and when the above-mentioned conditions exist.
    • Constitution benches have decided many of India’s best-known and most important Supreme Court cases, such as:
    1. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (Preventive detention)
    2. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (Basic structure doctrine) and
    3. Ashoka Kumar Thakur v. Union of India (OBC reservations) etc.

     

  • [pib] Nyaya Vikas Portal

    Central Idea: The Nyaya Vikas Portal has been created for monitoring the implementation of the Centrally Sponsored, Nyaya Vikas Scheme.

    What is Nyaya Vikas Program?

    • Initiated by the Department of Justice in 1993-94.
    • Aims to develop infrastructure facilities for districts and subordinate judiciary.
    • Provides central assistance to state governments and UT administrations for constructing court halls and residential units.
    • Extended beyond March 31, 2021, with additional features for convenience, such as lawyers’ halls, toilet complexes, and digital computer rooms.
    • Funding sharing pattern: 60:40 between the central government and state governments (excluding North Eastern and Himalayan States), 90:10 for North Eastern and Himalayan States, and 100% for Union Territories.

    About Nyaya Vikas Portal

    • The Nyaya Vikas Portal has been created to monitor the implementation of the CSS for Development of Infrastructure Facilities for Districts and Subordinate Judiciary.
    • It allows stakeholders to log in through four efficient ways, providing seamless access to information related to funding, documentation, project monitoring, and approval.
    • The portal ensures transparency and accessibility by providing stakeholders with a centralized platform to access information about funding, documentation, project monitoring, and approval processes.

    Impact of the Scheme

    • Improved infrastructure: The portal’s monitoring capabilities contribute to the effective utilization of funds for constructing court halls, residential units, lawyers’ halls, toilet complexes, and digital computer rooms.
    • Enhanced judicial services: By providing better infrastructure and facilities, the portal enhances the delivery of judicial services to lawyers, litigants, and judicial officers.
    • Strengthened rule of law: The efficient implementation of the scheme through the portal strengthens the rule of law by ensuring access to justice and adequate infrastructure for the judiciary.

  • Judicial Development: Concerns Over the Role of the CJI

    Central Idea

    • A recent judicial development has raised concerns about the authority and powers of the Chief Justice of India (CJI) in influencing judicial decisions. The recall application filed by the Union of India against a judgment regarding the right to default bail, followed by an interim order from the Court of the CJI, has highlighted the need to reassess the constitutional framework and the extent of the CJI’s administrative powers

    An Extraordinary Decision and its Unusual Turn

    • Safeguarding the Right to Default Bail: The Division Bench of the Supreme Court in Ritu Chhabria v. Union of India recognized the right of an undertrial to be released on default bail if the investigation exceeds the statutory time limit. It criticized the practice of charge-sheeting accused individuals despite incomplete investigations and emphasized that the filing of a preliminary charge-sheet does not extinguish the right to bail.
    • Surprising Recall Application: The Court of the CJI entertained a recall application filed by the Union of India against the Ritu Chhabria judgment. This move deviated from the usual course of filing a review petition before the same Bench. The interim order passed by the Court of the CJI effectively stayed the Division Bench’s decision, even though it had no direct connection to the case.

    Concerns over the Role of the CJI

    • Intra-court Appeal without Legislative or Constitutional Backing: The recall application before a different Bench, including the CJI, raises concerns about the absence of a legislative or constitutional framework for such appeals. This practice can be seen as bench fishing or forum shopping, creating a mechanism devoid of legal legitimacy.
    • The CJI’s Administrative Powers: While all Supreme Court judges possess equal judicial powers, the CJI enjoys special administrative powers as the ‘Master of the Roster.’ These powers include constituting Benches and assigning matters for reconsideration. However, within a Bench, the CJI’s vote holds no greater weight than that of other judges.
    • Issues of Judicial Equality: While historically, the CJI has authored minority opinions, the recent interim order raises concerns about the extent of the CJI’s influence on judicial decisions. Other countries, such as the United Kingdom, Australia, and Canada, have systems where judges collectively exercise power, reflecting the collective strength of the Court.

    Cause for Concern

    • Instances of Abuse: Recorded instances of infirmities and irregularities in case assignments have raised concerns about the potential abuse of administrative powers by the CJI. The unending nature of these powers makes it impractical to establish limits, emphasizing the need for transparency and checks.
    • The Need for Checks and Balance: To maintain the integrity of the judiciary, it is crucial to limit the expansion of the CJI’s powers as the ‘Master of the Roster.’ The computerization of case assignments and the removal of discretionary powers from the CJI can mitigate concerns of undue influence and ensure a fair and impartial judicial process.

    Administrative Powers of the CJI

    • Constitution of Benches: The CJI has the authority to constitute various Benches within the Supreme Court, including both Division Benches and larger Constitution Benches. This power allows the CJI to assign judges to specific cases and distribute the workload among the judges.
    • Assignment of Matters: The CJI has the discretion to assign specific cases or references to different Benches for adjudication. This includes allocating matters to the appropriate Benches based on subject matter, complexity, and other relevant factors.
    • Reconsideration of Matters: The CJI can refer cases or issues for reconsideration by a larger Bench. This power enables the CJI to ensure consistency in judicial pronouncements, resolve conflicting decisions, or clarify legal principles through the review of previous judgments.
    • Administrative Decision-Making: The CJI is responsible for making administrative decisions related to the court’s functioning, including the allocation of courtrooms, assignment of court staff, and management of infrastructure and resources.
    • Appointment of Judicial Officers: The CJI plays a significant role in the appointment and transfer of judges to various high courts and other tribunals. This responsibility includes participating in the collegium system, which involves recommending suitable candidates for judicial appointments.
    • Judicial Administration: The CJI oversees the overall functioning of the judiciary, including setting standards for court procedures, case management, and promoting efficiency in the delivery of justice. The CJI works closely with other judges, court officials, and stakeholders to ensure the smooth operation of the judicial system

    Facts for prelims

    Key provisions related to the CJI’s administrative authority

    • Article 145: This article enables the CJI, as the head of the court, to exercise administrative control over the functioning of the Supreme Court.
    • Article 146: This article empowers the CJI to appoint officers and servants of the Supreme Court and to determine their conditions of service. It allows the CJI to administer the court’s staff and resources in order to ensure efficient administration.
    • Article 147: This article establishes the authority of the CJI in matters related to the appointment and posting of officers and servants of the Supreme Court. The CJI has the power to determine the strength and composition of the court’s administrative staff.
    • Article 229: This article deals with the appointment of retired judges of the Supreme Court and high courts to act as ad-hoc judges. The CJI plays a significant role in appointing and assigning duties to these ad-hoc judges, which contributes to the efficient functioning of the judiciary.
    • Article 124(3): This provision relates to the appointment of judges to the Supreme Court. The CJI, as part of the collegium system, participates in the process of recommending suitable candidates for judicial appointments. The collegium consists of the CJI and a group of senior judges, and their recommendations play a crucial role in judicial appointments.

    Conclusion

    • While the administrative powers of the CJI are necessary for the efficient functioning of the Court, their exercise should adhere to constitutional principles and established legal procedures. It is imperative to establish transparent systems and minimize discretionary powers to safeguard the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your personal mentor for UPSC 2024 | Schedule your FREE session and get the Prelims prep Toolkit!

    Also read:

    Back in news: Collegium System

     

  • Live streaming of Court Proceedings

    live streaming court

    Central Idea

    • The significance of live-streaming court proceedings as an extension of the ‘open justice’ and ‘open courts’ principle remains largely unrealized in India.
    • Only nine out of the 25 High Courts in the country have implemented live streaming, while the Supreme Court restricts it to Constitutional cases.

    What is live-streaming technology?

    • At its core, streaming content is meant to help people attend events, expos, and experiences they cannot attend in person.
    • Live streaming technology is how videos are streamed over the internet, live, in real-time, as they are being recorded.
    • Live streaming technology is the internet’s response to live television broadcasts, with the most popular being news shows and sports.

    Why discuss this?

    • The Supreme Court emphasized the need for live streaming in district courts and High Courts as these are the courts where most citizens seek justice.
    • Time and resource constraints, as well as the inability to travel long distances, limit public access to court hearings.
    • Videoconferencing became essential since the COVID-19 pandemic, as physical hearings were not possible.

    Early Adopters

    • The Gujarat HC pioneered live streaming in October 2020, streaming proceedings on YouTube as an experiment.
    • Other HCs, such as Karnataka and Meghalaya, followed with varying degrees of success.
    • The Gujarat HC’s YouTube channel gained 1.24 lakh subscribers and 1.9 crore views.

    Existing Restrictions

    • Model Rules for Live Streaming and Recording of Court Proceedings: These exclude certain case categories from live streaming, including matrimonial matters, child adoption and custody, sexual offences, child sexual abuse, and juvenile cases.
    • Broadcasting rights issue: The Delhi High Court notified rules for live streaming proceedings but imposed restrictions such as a ban on reproducing or transmitting audio-visual recordings.

    Significance of live streaming

    • Instilling Faith in the Judiciary: Allowing ordinary people to view the workings of the highest court without barriers builds faith in the judiciary.
    • Empowering the Masses: Live streaming enables the legal system to empower the masses and develop an informed citizenry.
    • Respect for Rule of Law: Understanding the importance of the rule of law and how the judiciary protects the rights of marginalized sections of society.
    • Living up to Constitutional Expectations: Live streaming aligns with public interest and the preservation of constitutional Article 19 and 21.
    • Increased Transparency: Encourages the principle of open court, reduces reliance on second-hand information, and allows the public’s right to know.
    • Elevating Legal Standards: Lawyers become better prepared, refrain from irresponsible remarks, and take justice delivery more seriously.
    • Level Playing Field: Provides equal opportunities for younger lawyers to showcase their skills and competence.
    • Academic Advancement: Inspires law students and encourages legal research on the functioning of the judiciary and the legal profession.
    • Easy Accessibility: Eliminates the need for physical presence, allowing litigants to access proceedings from anywhere.

    Issues with such policy

    • Contempt of Court: Existing video clips of court proceedings on social media platforms often lack context and sensationalize events, potentially undermining the dignity of the court.
    • Disinformation and Sensationalism: There are concerns that misuse or selective use of live streaming content may contribute to the spread of disinformation among the public.
    • Unnecessary Activism: Increased visibility through live streaming could lead to justices behaving like politicians, seeking individual exposure rather than focusing solely on justice.

    Physical barriers for it

    • Internet Connectivity: Issues related to internet connectivity may hinder seamless live streaming, requiring attention for reliable access to court proceedings.
    • Adequate Infrastructure: Provision of well-equipped spaces where lawyers can effectively present their cases is crucial for a smooth transition to live-streamed proceedings.
    • Awareness and Training: Judges, court staff, and lawyers may lack familiarity with digital technology and its benefits. Efforts should be made to raise awareness and provide comprehensive training to ensure their proficiency.

    Global examples

    • Several countries, including the United States, Brazil, the United Kingdom, Canada, and China, have implemented live streaming of court proceedings in various formats.
    • Live streaming formats include audio recordings (US), video recordings streamed on television (Brazil), video streaming on court websites (UK, Canada), and live streaming from trial courts up to the supreme court (China).

    Way Forward

    To promote open justice and improve access to justice, the following steps are recommended:

    • Implementation of live streaming in all courtrooms of the Supreme Court and across all High Courts and district courts.
    • Ensuring adequate infrastructure for videoconferencing and live streaming beyond the pandemic.
    • Reviewing and revising restrictions on live streaming to strike a balance between transparency and privacy concerns.
    • Conducting awareness campaigns to educate the public about the availability and benefits of live-streamed court proceedings.

     

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your personal mentor for UPSC 2024

  • Unconstitutional Expansion of Delhi’s Government Authority

    Central Idea

    • The recent promulgation of The Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (Amendment) Ordinance, 2023 by the President of India has sparked a debate concerning the scope of the Supreme Court’s verdict and the constitutionality of the ordinance.

    Court’s Verdict and interpretations

    • In interpreting Article 239AA(3)(a), the Court ruled:
    1. It determined that the Legislative Assembly of the NCT Delhi has the authority with the exception
    2. The Court clarified that the executive power of the NCTD is co-extensive with its legislative power, encompassing all matters within its legislative jurisdiction.
    3. It established that the Union of India has executive power over three entries in List II, which the NCTD does not have legislative competence
    • Court’s verdict: Based on these interpretations, the Court concluded that the executive power over services falls exclusively under the Government of the NCTD. This interpretation aligns with the language of Article 239AA(3)(a) of the Constitution.
    • However, the subsequent ordinance promulgated by the President on May 19, through the exercise of legislative power under Article 123, expanded the scope of excepted matters in Article 239AA(3)(a).

    Facts for prelims

    Article Description
    Article 123 Empowers the President to issue ordinances during Parliament’s recess.
    Article 239 Deals with the administration of Union Territories.
    Article 239A Provides for the creation of a Legislative Assembly for the Union Territory of Delhi.
    Article 239AA Contains special provisions for the Union Territory of Delhi, including the establishment of a Legislative Assembly and governance structure.
    Article 368 Outlines the procedure for amending the Constitution.
    Article 144 Deals with the binding nature of the Supreme Court’s judgments on all courts and authorities in India.
    Article 213 Empowers the Governor of a state to promulgate ordinances during the recess of the state legislature.

    Why the constitutionality of the ordinance in this regard is highly questionable?

    • Bypassing the constitutional amendment process: The ordinance expanded the scope of excepted matters in Article 239AA(3)(a). However, such an expansion would require a constitutional amendment under Article 368. By utilizing Article 123, which grants legislative power during the period of Parliament’s recess, instead of following the constitutional amendment process, the ordinance may be considered unconstitutional.
    • Limits of legislative power: The power conferred on Parliament under Article 239AA(3)(b) is to make fresh laws, not to directly amend Article 239AA(3)(a) of the Constitution. Therefore, altering the scope of Article 239AA(3)(a) would require a constitutional amendment under Article 368.
    • Colorable exercise of power: By expanding the scope of excepted matters without amending the Constitution through the appropriate procedure, the ordinance may be seen as a colorable exercise of power. It is essential to adhere to the constitutional amendment process to ensure the validity and legitimacy of legislative actions.

    Implications of the Court’s Judgment

    • Binding nature: When a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court declares or interprets the law, its decision becomes binding on all courts and authorities in India according to Articles 141 and 144, respectively. The Court’s interpretation of Article 239AA(3)(a), which affirmed the exclusive executive power of the Government of the National Capital Territory of Delhi (NCTD) over services, is legally binding on all courts and authorities. This means that the government and other entities must adhere to this interpretation.
    • Limits on executive power: The Court’s verdict clarified the extent of executive power held by the NCTD and the Union of India. This delineation of executive power sets clear boundaries and ensures a proper division of responsibilities between the NCTD and the Union government.
    • Requirement of constitutional amendment: The Court’s verdict highlighted the need for a constitutional amendment to alter the scope of Article 239AA(3)(a) and expanding the exceptions in Article 239AA(3)(a) would require a constitutional amendment under Article 368. This reaffirms the importance of adhering to the constitutional amendment process to ensure the integrity and legitimacy of any changes made to the Constitution.
    • Questioning the validity of the ordinance: The Court’s judgment raises questions about the validity of the subsequent ordinance promulgated by the President. The ordinance, which expanded the scope of excepted matters in Article 239AA(3)(a), may be deemed unconstitutional.

    Conclusion

    • The Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (Amendment) Ordinance, 2023 raises constitutional concerns. Its expansion of excepted matters without a constitutional amendment is likely to be struck down. The ordinance is void ab initio and represents a colorable exercise of power. Only Parliament, through proper amendment procedures, can alter the scope of Article 239AA(3)(a).

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your personal mentor for UPSC 2024 | Schedule your FREE session and get the Prelims prep Toolkit!

    Also read:

    Power Struggle in Delhi: Balancing Democracy, Governance, and Accountability

     

  • Why do judges seek ‘RECUSAL’ for themselves?

    Central Idea

    Recusals by judges have been a frequent occurrence in recent weeks, raising important questions about the circumstances under which judges should recuse themselves, the need for recording reasons for recusal, and the reliance on individual judges’ discretion.

    What is Recusal?

    • Recusal is the removal of oneself as a judge or policymaker in a particular matter, especially because of a conflict of interest.
    • Recusal usually takes place when a judge has a conflict of interest or has a prior association with the parties in the case.
    • For example, if the case pertains to a company in which the judge holds stakes, the apprehension would seem reasonable.
    • Similarly, if the judge has, in the past, appeared for one of the parties involved in a case, the call for recusal may seem right.
    • A recusal inevitably leads to delay. The case goes back to the Chief Justice, who has to constitute a fresh Bench.

    Reasons for Judicial Recusal

    • Conflict of interest: Recusal often occurs when a judge has a direct conflict of interest or a prior association with the parties involved in a case. For instance, if a judge holds stakes in a company involved in the case, it would be reasonable to recuse themselves.
    • Earlier difference of opinion: Similarly, if the judge previously represented one of the parties in a case, recusal may be necessary.
    • Prevent bias: Some judges may recuse themselves based on apprehension of bias, while others may refuse to withdraw, considering the potential damage to the institution.
    • Absence of Codified Rules: India currently lacks codified rules specifically governing recusals, but the Supreme Court has addressed the issue through various judgments.

    Procedure for Recusal

    • Automatic and Plea-based Recusal: Recusal can happen automatically when a judge recognizes a conflict of interest or when a party raises a plea for recusal due to bias or personal interest.
    • Judge’s Discretion: The decision to recuse rests solely on the conscience and discretion of the judge; no party can compel a judge to withdraw.
    • Transfer of the Case: When a judge recuses, the case is transferred to the Chief Justice, who reassigns it to an alternate bench to ensure the continuity of proceedings.

    Recording Reasons for Recusal

    • Responsibility of Judges: Since there are no statutory rules, judges are responsible for recording their reasons for recusal.
    • Oral or Written Disclosure: Reasons for recusal can be specified orally in open court or through a written order, or they may remain undisclosed.

    Criticism

    • Lack of transparency: This regarding reasons for recusal has faced criticism, particularly when mass recusals occur in sensitive cases.
    • Motives undisclosed: Some judgments have argued for the need to indicate reasons to avoid attributing motives to recusals, while others express concerns that specifying reasons could lead to challenges and hinder the recusal process.
    • Inevitable delay: Recusal inevitably leads to delays in the proceedings as the case is transferred back to the Chief Justice, who must assign it to a fresh bench.

    Past Supreme Court Rules on Recusal

    • Factors for Impartiality: The Supreme Court has established various factors to determine the impartiality of a judge in previous judgments.
    • Reasonableness of Apprehension: The reasonableness of the party’s apprehension of bias is a crucial consideration when deciding whether recusal is necessary.
    • Definition of Judicial Bias: Judicial bias is defined as a predisposition that compromises a judge’s impartiality.
    • Real Danger Test: Pecuniary interests automatically disqualify a judge, while other cases require applying the “real danger” test to evaluate the possibility of bias.

    Issues with Recusal

    • Abdication of Duty: Recusal has been viewed as a potential abdication of a judge’s duty, raising concerns about maintaining institutional civility while fulfilling the independent role of judges as adjudicators.
    • Importance of Providing Reasons: Justice Kurian Joseph, in his separate opinion in the 2015 National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) judgment, emphasized the importance of judges providing reasons for recusal to enhance transparency.
    • Constitutional Duty for Transparency: Indicating reasons for recusal is a constitutional duty, reflecting the need for judges to be transparent and accountable.

    Practices in Foreign Jurisdictions

    • United States: It has well-defined laws and codes that explicitly detail grounds for recusal, such as financial interests, prior involvement as a lawyer or witness, and relationships with parties.
    • United Kingdom: It has adopted the “real danger” test to disqualify judges based on substantive evidence of bias, although this approach has faced criticism.

    Importance of Appearance of Bias

    • The European Convention of Human Rights emphasizes the significance of the “appearance of bias” to ensure fairness from the perspective of a reasonable observer.

    Way Forward

    • To ensure fairness and maintain public trust in the justice system, it is crucial to establish clear guidelines and rules for recusal in India.
    • Codifying principles, requiring judges to record reasons for recusal, and promoting transparency can address concerns about bias and uphold the integrity of the judiciary.
    • Learning from foreign jurisdictions, such as studying the comprehensive recusal laws in the United States, can provide valuable insights for developing a robust framework for recusal in India.
    • Enhancing transparency and accountability in the recusal process will contribute to a stronger and more trusted judicial system.

     

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your personal mentor for UPSC 2024