💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (August Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

GS Paper: Executive & Judiciary

  • CJI’s recommendation on ‘Successor’ sought

    Chief Justice of India N.V. Ramana has received a communication from the Union Law Minister seeking his recommendation on the appointment of the next top judge.

    What is the news?

    • Chief Justice Ramana is retiring this month.
    • It is now left to CJI to give the Law Minister his recommendation on his successor.

    How is CJI selected?

    • Justice U.U. Lalit is the senior-most judge in the Supreme Court now.
    • He is in line to be appointed the 49th CJI as per the seniority norm.
    • The ‘Memorandum of Procedure of Appointment of Supreme Court Judges’ says “appointment to the office of the CJI should be of the seniormost Judge of the SC considered fit to hold the office”.
    • The process begins with the Union Law Minister seeking the recommendation of the outgoing CJI about the next appointment.

    What is the time frame?

    • The Minister has to seek the CJI’s recommendation at the “appropriate time”.
    • The Memorandum does NOT elaborate or specify a timeline.

    Making final appointment

    The Memorandum says:

    1. Receipt of the recommendation of the CJI
    2. The Union Minister of Law, Justice and Company Affairs will put up the recommendation to the PM
    3. PM will advise the President in the matter of appointment
    4. President of India appoints the CJI

    Chief Justice of India: A brief background

    • The CJI is the chief judge of the Supreme Court of India as well as the highest-ranking officer of the Indian federal judiciary.

    Appointment

    • The Constitution of India grants power to the President to nominate, and with the advice and consent of the Parliament, appoint a chief justice, who serves until they reach the age of 65 or until removed by impeachment.
    • Earlier, it was a convention to appoint seniormost judges.
    • However, this has been broken twice. In 1973, Justice A. N. Ray was appointed superseding 3 senior judges.
    • Also, in 1977 Justice Mirza Hameedullah Beg was appointed as the chief justice superseding Justice Hans Raj Khanna.

    Qualifications

    The Indian Constitution says in Article 124 (3) that in order to be appointed as a judge in the Supreme Court of India, the person has to fit in the following criteria:

    • He/She is a citizen of India and
    • has been for at least five years a Judge of a High Court or of two or more such Courts in succession; or
    • has been for at least ten years an advocate of a High Court or of two or more such Courts in succession; or
    • is, in the opinion of the President, a distinguished jurist

    Functions

    • As head of the Supreme Court, the CJI is responsible for the allocation of cases and appointment of constitutional benches which deal with important matters of law.
    • In accordance with Article 145 of the Constitution and the Supreme Court Rules of Procedure of 1966, the chief justice allocates all work to the other judges.

    On the administrative side, the CJI carries out the following functions:

    • maintenance of the roster; appointment of court officials and general and miscellaneous matters relating to the supervision and functioning of the Supreme Court

    Removal

    • Article 124(4) of the Constitution lays down the procedure for removal of a judge of the Supreme Court which is applicable to chief justices as well.
    • Once appointed, the chief justice remains in the office until the age of 65 years. He can be removed only through a process of removal by Parliament as follows:
    • He/She can be removed by an order of the President passed after an address by each House of Parliament supported by a majority of the total membership of that House and by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the members of that House present.
    • The voting has been presented to the President in the same session for such removal on the ground of proven misbehavior or incapacity.

    Try this PYQ:

    1. Who/Which of the following is the custodian of the Constitution of India?

    (a) The President of India

    (b) The Prime Minister of India

    (c) The Lok Sabha Secretariat

    (d) The Supreme Court of India

     

    [wpdiscuz-feedback id=”0dci9sxykf” question=”Please leave a feedback on this” opened=”1″]Post your answers here.[/wpdiscuz-feedback]

     

    UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • PM and President’s photos in Govt Ads: Judicial Interpretation

    The Madras High Court has directed the Tamil Nadu government to include the photographs of the President of India and Prime Minister in advertisements on the 44th Chess Olympiad underway in Chennai.

    Why in news?

    • The HC relied on a 2015 Supreme Court ruling that issued guidelines on government spending on advertisements.

    How can we classify Govt Ads with other political ads?

    The primary cause of government advertisement is to use public funds:

    • To inform the public of their rights, obligations, and entitlements
    • To explain Government policies, programs, services and initiatives.

    2015 Supreme Court’s Ruling

    • In Common Cause v Union of India, the Supreme Court sought to regulate the government expenditure on advertisements.
    • It essentially regulated the 2007 New Advertisement Policy of the Government of India.
    • The petitioners had argued that there is arbitrary spending on advertisements by the government.
    • The allegations ranged from wastage of public money for political mileage to using advertisements as a tool to manipulate media.
    • A three-judge Bench comprising then CJI P Sathasivam, and Justices Ranjan Gogoi and N V Ramana had set up a committee to suggest a better policy.

    What are the guidelines?

    • No endorsement: Patronization of any particular media house must be avoided and award of advertisements must be on an equal basis to all newspapers who may, however, be categorized depending upon their circulation.
    • The Government Advertisements (Content Regulation) Guidelines 2014 have five broad principles:
    1. Advertising campaigns are to be related to government responsibilities
    2. Materials should be presented in an objective, fair manner and designed to meet objectives of the campaign
    3. Advertisements must not directed at promoting political interests of a party
    4. Campaigns must be justified and undertaken in a cost-effective manner
    5. Advertisements must comply with legal requirements and financial regulations

    What did the Supreme Court rule?

    • It largely accepted the committee report except on a few issues:
    1. The appointment of an ombudsman to oversee the implementation of the guidelines
    2. A special performance audit of government spending
    3. An embargo on publication of advertisements on the eve of elections
    • The ruling mandated that government advertisements will not contain a political party’s symbol, logo or flag.
    • They are required to be politically neutral and must refrain from glorifying political personalities.

    What about photographs in advertisements?

    • The Supreme Court agreed with the committee’s suggestion that photographs of leaders should be avoided and only the photographs of the President/ PM or Governor/ CM shall be used for effective government messaging.
    • Then-Attorney General had opposed the recommendation arguing that if the PM’s photograph is allowed in the advertisement, then the same right should be available to his cabinet colleagues as the PM is the “first among the equals”.
    • The court, while restricting the recommendation to the photos of the President and Prime Minister, added the photograph of the Chief Justice of India to that list of exceptions.

    What are the takeaways from the SC and HC verdicts?

    • The SC ruling stepped into content regulation, which is a facet of the right to freedom of speech and expression, and was also in the domain of making policy.
    • This raised questions on the judiciary stepping on the executive’s domain.
    • The SC ruling did not mandate publication of the photograph of the PM and President, but only restricts publication of photos of government officials other than the President, PM, CJI, CM and the Governor.
    • In an opposition-ruled state such as Tamil Nadu, exclusion of the PM’s photos is seen as a political move.
    • The HC said that considering the “national interest” in the issue, the “excuses taken by the state” cannot be accepted.

     

    UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • PMLA has SC’s approaval

    Context

    The Supreme Court has upheld the constitutional validity of the provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), calling it a “unique and special legislation” and underlining the powers of the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) to hold inquiries, arrest people and attach property.

    Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA)

    • PMLA, 2002 is an Act of the Parliament of India enacted by the NDA government to prevent money laundering and to provide for confiscation of property derived from money laundering.
    • It was enacted in response to India’s global commitment (including the Vienna Convention) to combat the menace of money laundering.
    • PMLA and the Rules notified there under came into force with effect from July 1, 2005.
    • The act was amended in the year 2005, 2009 and 2012.

    Objectives of PMLA

    The PMLA seeks to combat money laundering in India and has three main objectives:

    • To prevent and control money laundering.
    • To confiscate and seize the property obtained from the laundered money; and
    • To deal with any other issue connected with money laundering in India.

    Issues with the PMLA

    • Opacity: The Enforcement Case Report (the analogue of an FIR) is not shared with the accused.
    • Nor are the full grounds of arrest shared with you.
    • Bail cannot be granted without hearing the prosecution and you are required to prove your innocence to get bail.
    • Lack of clarity in definition: The definition of crime under this Act is elastic.
    • The sovereign has immense latitude to define what counts as the relevant crime.
    • It can also in a classic instance of rule by law change the presumption of innocence.
    • Lack of safeguard: The list of crimes included overrides similar crimes in other parts of the law.
    • The code has an exceptional procedure of its own that can trump the safeguards of the Criminal Code of Procedure.
    • In theory, the law provides safeguards against attaching properties, but those safeguards are weak and do not allow for even reasonable exceptions that might be necessary for your dignity or continuing with your business or livelihood.
    • Mere possession of the proceeds of a crime, without any surrounding consideration of how one came to be in possession of the proceeds, makes it an offence.
    • That the state officials are not classed as police. But they, in some respects, have even more power than the police.
    • Use of Money Bill route: The law itself has been enacted by using the controversial Money Bill route.
    • Low conviction rate: The conviction rate under this law is very low, less than 0.5 per cent.
    • Misuse of law: The stringent provisions and vagueness in definitions in the law make it susceptible to misuse against a political opponenet.
    • International context: Post 9/11, there was concern with terrorist financing and arguably many international treaties actually weakened, rather than strengthened, individual rights protections.
    • The goal of international treaties is laudable.
    • But the rhetoric of international treaties is often used to override domestic rights safeguards.

    Conclusion

    There is a need for a review of the various provision and definitions in the law and their utility.

    UPSC 2023 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • Latest guidelines on Arrests and Bail Orders

    On July 11, a division bench of the Supreme Court of India in Satender Kumar Antil vs CBI laid down fresh guidelines on arrests in order to have strict compliance with the provisions of Section 41 and 41A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

    Why in news?

    • In recent times, there have been several controversies regarding the arrest and subsequent bail of accused persons.
    • On July 16, even the Chief Justice of India (CJI) cautioned against “hasty and indiscriminate arrests”.
    • He further commented on the delay in bails and the plight of undertrial prisoners.

    What are the guidelines?

    • In the case of Arnesh Kumar (2014), the apex Court had rightly observed that “arrest brings humiliation, curtails freedom and cast scars forever”.
    • With regard to the Satender Kumar Antil case, the Court has issued specific directions and has also called for a compliance report.
    • The Court said that the investigating agencies and their officers are duty-bound to comply with the mandate of Section 41 and 41A and the directions issued.

    How is a person arrested?

    • Arrest in its simplest form is defined as, “when one is taken and restrained from his liberty”.
    • The police has wide powers to arrest under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
    • In the Joginder Kumar (1994) verdict, the Court had stated that “arrest and detention in police lock-up of a person can cause incalculable harm to the reputation and self-esteem of a person”.

    What are Sections 41 and 41A of the Code of Criminal Procedure?

    • Section 41 provides for the circumstances in which arrest can be made by the police without a warrant and mandates for reasons to be recorded in writing for every arrest and non-arrest.
    • Section 41A provides for the requirement of a notice to be sent by the investigating agencies before making an arrest in certain conditions prescribed by the Code.

    What did the court comment regarding these articles?

    • The Court stated that any dereliction on the part of the agencies has to be brought to the notice of the higher authorities by the court followed by appropriate action.
    • The Bench further said that the courts will have to satisfy themselves on the compliance of Section 41 and 41A.
    • Any non-compliance would entitle the accused for a grant of bail.

    What are the guidelines with respect to bail?

    Regarding bail, the Court has made a specific observation in the form of an obiter that the:

    • GoI may consider the introduction of a separate enactment, i.e. a Bail Act, so as to streamline the grant of bails.
    • It is clearly stated that there need not be any insistence on a bail application while considering the application under Sections 88, 170, 204 and 209 of the Code.
    • The Court said that there needs to be a strict compliance of the mandate laid down in the judgment of this court in Siddharth” (Siddharth vs State of U.P., 2021).
    • It is a clear direction of the Court that bail applications ought to be disposed of within a period of two weeks except if the provisions mandate otherwise — the exception being an intervening application.
    • The Court also said that applications for anticipatory bail are expected to be disposed of within a period of six weeks with the exception of any intervening application.
    • The High Courts have been directed by the apex court to identify undertrial prisoners who cannot comply with bail conditions.

    Way forward

    • The State and Central governments will have to comply with the directions issued by the Court from time to time with respect to the constitution of special courts.
    • The High Court in consultation with the State governments will have to undertake an exercise on the need for special courts.
    • The vacancies should be filled up in the position of Presiding Officers of the special courts, expeditiously.
    • The CJI has also raised the issue of vacant positions and infrastructural requirements in the judiciary.

     

    UPSC 2023 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • What kind of President does India need?

    Context

    India is going to elect its new President on July 18. The new President will be sworn in on July 25. Choosing the presidential candidate is an intensely political exercise.

    Election of the President

    • Direct or indirect election: The main question debated therein was whether India should have a directly elected President or an indirectly elected one.
    • The Assembly opted for an indirectly elected President.
    • Dr. B.R. Ambedkar said: “Our President is merely a nominal figurehead. He has no discretion; he has no powers of administration at all.”
    • Article 53 of the Constitution says that “the executive power of the Union shall be vested in the President and shall be exercised by him either directly or through officers subordinate to him in accordance with this Constitution.”
    • It means the President exercises these powers only on the aid and the advice of the Council of Ministers.

    People’s presence in the election of the President

    • It is an indirect election in the sense that the people do not directly elect the President.
    • Under Article 54, the President is elected by an electoral college consisting of only the elected members of both Houses of Parliament and the elected members of the State and Union Territory Assemblies.
    • A matter of importance in this context is the vote value of Members of the Legislative Assemblies (MLAs) and the formula for its computation.
    •  The vote of an MLA, though one, is assigned a certain higher value.
    • This value is calculated by first dividing the total population of the State (as per the 1971 Census) by the total strength of the Assembly, and then the quotient is divided by one thousand.
    •  In the computation of the value, the population of the State figures in a significant way.
    •  In other words, the population of the country is a crucial factor in the election of the President, which means the people’s presence in the process of electing the President is very much visible.

    Moral authority of the President

    • Wider base: The people’s presence in the election of the President gives a wider base to the President than a mere vote by the legislators on the basis of one member, one vote.
    • This also gives the President a greater moral authority.
    • So, the Indian President is not and cannot be a mere rubber stamp.
    • Reconsideration of decision: He does not directly exercise the executive authority of the Union, but he can disagree with the decision of the Council of Ministers, caution them, counsel them, and so on.
    • The President can ask the Cabinet to reconsider its decisions.
    • However, the Cabinet, after such reconsideration, sends the same proposal back without any change, the President will have to sign it.

    Role of the President as envisage by the Constitution

    • Broader view of the things: The Constitution of India wants the President to be vigilant and responsive, and gives the freedom to him or her to take a broader view of things uninfluenced by the narrow political view of the executive.
    • Preserve, protect and defend the Constitution: The above point becomes clearer when we take a look at the oath the President takes before entering office.
    • The oath contains two solemn promises.
    • First, the President shall preserve, protect and defend the Constitution.
    • Second, the President shall devote himself or herself to the service and the well-being of the people of India.
    • Thus, it is possible for a President to disagree with the government or intervene on behalf of the citizenry against the tyranny of the executive and persuade it to give up its ways.

    Conclusion

    The method adopted for the election of the President and the promises made in the oath makes it clear that the President cannot act as a gramophone of the Prime Minister as mentioned by professor K.T. Shah.

    UPSC 2023 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • Bail Law and Supreme Court call for Reform

    The Supreme Court underlined the pressing need for reform in the law related to bail and called on the government to consider framing a special legislation on the lines of the law in the United Kingdom.

    What is Bail?

    • Bail is the conditional release of a defendant with the promise to appear in court when required.
    • The term also means the security that is deposited in order to secure the release of the accused.

    Types of Bail in India

    • Depending upon the sage of the criminal matter, there are commonly three types of bail in India:
    1. Regular bail: A regular bail is generally granted to a person who has been arrested or is in police custody. A bail application can be filed for the regular bail under section 437 and 439 of CrPC.
    2. Interim bail: This type of bail is granted for a short period of time and it is granted before the hearing for the grant of regular bail or anticipatory bail.
    3. Anticipatory bail: Anticipatory bail is granted under section 438 of CrPC either by session court or High Court. An application for the grant of anticipatory bail can be filed by the person who discerns that he may be arrested by the police for a non-bailable offense.

    Conditions for Grant of Bail in Bailable Offences

    • Section 436 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, lays down that a person accused of a bailable offense under IPC can be granted bail if:
    1. There are sufficient reasons to believe that the accused has not committed the offence.
    2. There is sufficient reason to conduct a further inquiry in the matter.
    3. The person is not accused of any offence punishable with death, life imprisonment or imprisonment up to 10 years.

    Conditions for Grant of Bail in Non-Bailable Offences

    • Section 437 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 lays down that the accused does not have the right to apply for bail in non-bailable offences.
    • It is discretion of the court to grant bail in case of non-bailable offences if:
    1. The accused is a woman or a child, bail can be granted in a non-bailable offence.
    2. There is a lack of evidence then bail in non-Bailable offenses can be granted.
    3. There is a delay in lodging FIR by the complainant, bail may be granted.
    4. The accused is gravely sick.

    What is the recent ruling about?

    • The Supreme Court underlined that arrest is a draconian measure that needs to be used sparingly.
    • The ruling is essentially a reiteration of several crucial principles of criminal procedure.

    Why bail needs reform?

    • Huge pendency of undertrials: Referring to the state of jails in the country, where over two-thirds lodged are undertrials,
    • Indiscriminate arrests: Of this category of prisoners, majority may not even be required to be arrested despite registration of a cognizable offense, being charged with offenses punishable for seven years or less.
    • Disadvantageous for some sections: They are not only poor and illiterate but also would include women. Thus, there is a culture of offense being inherited by many of them.
    • Colonial legacy: Theoretically, the court also linked the idea of indiscriminate arrests to magistrates ignoring the rule of “bail, not jail” to a colonial mindset.

    What is the law on bail?

    • The CrPC does not define the word bail but only categories offences under the Indian Penal Code as ‘bailable’ and ‘non-bailable’.
    • The CrPC empowers magistrates to grant bail for bailable offences as a matter of right.
    • This would involve release on furnishing a bail bond, without or without security.

    And what is the UK law?

    • The Bail Act of the United Kingdom, 1976, prescribes the procedure for granting bail.
    • A key feature is that one of the aims of the legislation is “reducing the size of the inmate population”.
    • The law also has provisions for ensuring legal aid for defendants.
    • The Act recognises a “general right” to be granted bail.

    What has the Supreme Court held on reforms?

    The court’s ruling is in the form of guidelines, and it also draws the line on certain procedural issues for the police and judiciary:

    • Separate law on Bail: The court underlined that the CrPC, despite amendments since Independence, largely retains its original structure as drafted by a colonial power over its subjects.
    • Uniform exercise of discretionary powers: It also highlighted that magistrates do not necessarily
    • Avoid indiscriminate arrests: The SC also directed all state governments and Union Territories to facilitate standing orders to comply with the orders and avoid indiscriminate arrests.

     

    UPSC 2023 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • A ‘no’ to pharma freebies

    Context

    The judgment by a two-judge Bench of the Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition by Apex Laboratories to claim deduction on freebies given to doctors.

    About the case

    •  In the said case, the company was giving out freebies to doctors in order for them to create awareness about a health supplement it was manufacturing called Zincovit.
    • Prohibited by the law: Upholding a decision by the Madras High Court, the Bench said that the act of pharmaceutical companies giving freebies to doctors is clearly ‘prohibited by the law’.
    • Further, it cannot be claimed as a deduction under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
    • The judge said that in the process of interpretation of the law, it is the responsibility of the court to discern the social purpose which the specific provision subserves.
    •  Invoking the principle of implied condition, the Court relied on the precedents in the case of P.V. Narasimha Rao (1998) 4 SCC 626 under the Prevention of Corruption Act, and Jamal Uddin Ahmad (2003) 4 SCC 257 under the Representation of the People Act.

    Immoral practice

    • Breach of trust: Laying emphasis on the fiduciary relationship between doctor and patient, the Court noted that a doctor’s prescription is considered as the final word on medication by the patient even if the cost of such medication is unaffordable.
    • In a situation where such trust is reposed in doctors, having prescriptions manipulated by the lure of freebies is immoral.
    • Driving up the cost of medicine: The Court was conscious that the cost of such freebies is factored in the cost of medicines sold, in turn driving up their prices and perpetuating a publicly injurious cycle.
    • This fact was taken note of by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Health and Family Welfare in its 45th report, dated August 4, 2010.
    • Report from the US: In its elaborate judgment, the Supreme Court bench also took note of a report issued by the United States Department of Health and Human Services Office called “Savings Available Under Full Generic Substitution of Multiple Source Brand Drugs in Medicare Part D”.
    • Here, it was stated that the beneficiaries could have saved over $600 million in out-of-pocket payments had they been dispensed generic equivalent drugs.
    •  In the U.S., by the reason of the Physician Payments Sunshine Act 2010 also known as Section 6002 of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) of 2010, the law compels the manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologic and medical supplies to report to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, on three broad categories of payments or transfers of value.

    Way forward

    • Keeping the price under control: Even though the Drug Price Control Order and Drugs and Cosmetics Act are there on the statute book, there is hardly any action to keep the sale price of medicines under control with due and proper investigation into their so-called research and development costs and keeping their profit margins within a prescribed limit.
    • The law should be amended to compel the manufacturer of drugs to sell at the verified genuine cost, that also factors in a reasonable profit margin for each product by bringing manufacturers, both foreign or domestic, under the control of the MCI or any other equivalent body.
    • This must be at a uniform rate throughout the country; further, classified life saving drugs should be sold at cost only or even at subsidised rates.

    Conclusion

    This judgment can also go far. It should be debated and applied to other unethical practices and expenditure out of public funds.

    UPSC 2023 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • Judicial Reforms in India

    Context

    Following are the reforms needed in the various aspects of the higher judiciary

    Removing the disparity between retirement ages of HC and SC judges

    • High Court judges now retire at 62 and Supreme Court judges at 65.
    • It is high time that we did away with the disparity between the retirement ages of High Court and Supreme Court judges.
    • There is no good reason for this difference.
    • Intense pressure and competition: The obvious negative fallout of a differential retirement age simply is intense pressure and competition to make it to the top court and thus get three more years.
    • If this is done away with, several judges of mettle would prefer to be Chief Justices and senior judges in the High Courts exercising wide power of influence rather than being a junior judge on a Bench of the Supreme Court.
    • There is good work to be done in the High Courts, and we need good men there.

    Create a cadre of public service for retired judges

    • SeveralSupreme Court judges focus on arbitrations after retirement.
    • A minority of judges devote themselves to public service; sadly, this is a very small minority.
    • Another lot are appointed to various constitutional posts and tribunals and commissions.
    • It would be worthwhile reform to create a cadre of public service for retired judges and from this pool make appointments to the constitutional and statutory posts and special assignments.
    • Such judges should receive the full pay and the facilities of a judge of the Supreme Court for life.
    • We should have a culture of public service for senior judges, and those who do not fit in such culture should not be a part of senior ranks.

    Reform in the process of appointment of Chief Justice of India

    • No constitutional basis: It is generally assumed that the seniormost judge of the Supreme Court should be the Chief Justice of India.
    • The Constitution mandates no such thing.
    • Article 124 merely states that the President will appoint every judge of the Supreme Court, and this includes the Chief Justice, and each of these judges shall hold office until they attain the age of 65 years.
    • The requirement about appointing the seniormost judge to be the CJI was devised in the Second Judges case (1993) and the consequent Memorandum of Procedure which is an usurpation of the President’s power.
    • There is no good reason why any one particular person should have a vested interest in the top job, and we are better served by eliminating such expectation.
    • Let all serve equally under the constitutional throne for the entire length of their tenure.

    But who then shall be the CJI?

    • As per the Constitution the judges of the High Court, senior advocates and distinguished jurists are eligible for the appointment as the judge of the Supreme Court.
    • Chief Justice of HC: When a serving CJI retires, his successor should be the best reputed Chief Justice of a High Court who has proved himself worthy both in judicial office as well as administrative leadership and has those qualities of heart and head which mark a good leader.
    • The same process is followed in the appointment of the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court.
    • Security of tenure: The appointee should have a clear three-year term.
    • He should not function as the primus super pares — calling the shots and having their unfettered way.
    • He should instead function in a true collegiate manner, especially in regard to the roster of allotment of cases, especially the sensitive ones, and appointments to the Supreme Court and High Courts and other important matters of judicial and administrative importance.

    Conclusion

    Though there are several issues that need reforms in the higher judiciary, the above reforms can serve as the precursor to the other reforms to come.

    UPSC 2023 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • Procedural gaps in death penalty sentencing

    Context

    In a judgment delivered last month, the Supreme Court, in Manoj & others v. State of MP, embarked on a significant attempt to reform the administration of the death penalty.

    Background: Crisis in the death penalty sentencing

    • There has long been a judicial crisis in death penalty sentencing on account of unprincipled sentencing, arbitrariness and worrying levels of subjectivity.
    • The crisis has been acknowledged by the Supreme Court, the Law Commission of India, research scholars and civil society groups.
    • Crime-centric nature: Death penalty sentencing has been, by and large, crime-centric.
    • This approach goes against the requirements imposed on sentencing judges by the Supreme Court in Bachan Singh (1980).

    The framework laid down in the Bachan Singh case

    • Take into account factors relating to crime and the accused: This framework made it binding for the sentencing judges to take into account factors relating to both the crime and accused and assign them appropriate weight.
    • Judges couldn’t decide to impose the death penalty only on the basis of the crime.
    • The background of the accused, the personal circumstances, mental health and age were considerations a sentencing judge had to account for.
    • Judges were required to weigh “mitigating” and “aggravating” factors to ascertain if a case was fit for the death sentence and also determine if the option of life imprisonment was “unquestionably foreclosed”.

    Why there is a crisis in death penalty sentencing?

    • The four decades since Bachan Singh have shown us that this framework has been followed more in breach.
    • There is utter confusion across all levels of the judiciary on the requirements of the framework laid down in the Bachan Singh case and its implementation.
    • Nature of crime a dominant consideration: An important reason for the breakdown is that factors relating to the crime — the nature of the crime and its brutality — are often dominant considerations, and there is barely any consideration of mitigating factors.
    • Little discussion on mitigating factors: There has been very little discussion on bringing the socioeconomic profile of death row prisoners as a mitigating factor into the courtroom.

    Significance of the SC judgment in Manoj & others v. State of MP

    • Efforts to plug the gap: The judgement identifies the lacuna as an explicit concern, states the consequences that flow from such a vital gap, and suggests measures to plug it.
    • Recognising reformation: A striking part of the judgment is its commitment to recognising reformation as integral to the Indian criminal justice system, especially death penalty sentencing.
    • Procedural threshold: The judgment is clear that certain procedural thresholds must be met for sentencing to be fair and explicitly rejects (once again) the idea that death sentences can be determined solely on crime-based considerations.
    • The verdict recognises that aspects of the accused’s life, both pre-offence and post-offence in prison, are relevant.
    • As practical steps in this process, the judgment asks courts to call for reports from the probation officer as well as prison and independent mental health experts.
    • Right of the accused to present mitigating factors: The right of the accused to present mitigating factors and rebut the state, if necessary, is also recognised.
    • Psychological and philosophical aspect taken into account: There is now overwhelming evidence from psychology that criminality cannot just be reduced to terrible decisions by individuals in the exercise of their free will.
    • All our actions are a result of a complex web of biological, psychological, and social factors and that understanding has a very significant bearing on discussions on criminality and punishment.

    Challenges

    • Implementation issue: Apart from this issue of implementation, even if detailed and high-quality sentencing information is to come into our courtrooms, a bigger challenge awaits.
    • The judicial treatment of sentencing information is a Pandora’s box that will inevitably have to be opened.
    • Requirement for normative basis: The Supreme Court will have to provide a rigorous normative basis for consideration of these factors.
    • In the absence of such foundations, death penalty sentencing will continue to be unprincipled and sentencing judges are not going to understand the need for this wide range of sentencing information.

    Conclusion

    The significance of last month’s judgment, authored by Justice Ravindra Bhat, is that it takes this problem head-on. It identifies the lacuna as an explicit concern, states the consequences that flow from such a vital gap, and suggests measures to plug it.

    UPSC 2023 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • Issues with Frivolous PIL Petitions

    A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) petitioner in the Supreme Court barely escaped having to pay ₹18 lakh for indulging in a “luxury litigation”.

    What is the news?

    • A Supreme Court Bench of Justice B.R. Gavai and Hima Kohli initially asked the litigant to pay ₹18 lakh, that is, ₹1 lakh for every one of the 18 minutes the case took up.
    • However, the court later, in its order, slashed the amount to ₹2 lakh on the request of the litigant’s counsel.

    Why did the apex court got disgusted?

    • The bench criticized the highly derogatory practice of filing frivolous petitions encroaching valuable judicial time.
    • This time can otherwise be utilised for addressing genuine concerns.

    What is Public Interest Litigation (PIL)?

    • PIL refers to litigation undertaken to secure public interest and demonstrates the availability of justice to socially-disadvantaged parties.
    • It was introduced by Justice P. N. Bhagwati in 1979.
    • It is the chief instrument through which judicial activism has flourished in India.
    • It is suited to the principles enshrined in Article 39A[a] of the Constitution to protect and deliver prompt social justice with the help of law.

    How was it introduced?

    • PIL is a relaxation on the traditional rule of locus standi.
    • Before 1980s the judiciary and the Supreme Court of India entertained litigation only from parties affected directly or indirectly by the defendant.
    • It heard and decided cases only under its original and appellate jurisdictions.
    • However, the Supreme Court began permitting cases on the grounds of PIL, which means that even people who are not directly involved in the case may bring matters of public interest to the court.
    • It is the court’s privilege to entertain the application for the PIL.

    Filing a PIL

    Any citizen can file a public case by filing a petition:

    • Under Art 32 of the Indian Constitution, in the Supreme Court
    • Under Art 226 of the Indian Constitution, in the High Court
    • Under 133 of the Criminal Procedure Code, in a Magistrate’s Court

    Parties against whom PILs can be filed

    • A PIL may be filed against state government, central government, municipal authority, private party.
    • Also, private person may be included in PIL as ‘Respondent’, after concerned of state authority.
    • g. a private factory in Mumbai which is causing pollution then PIL can be filed against the government of Mumbai, state pollution central board including that private factory of Mumbai.

    Importance of PIL

    • PIL gives a wider description to the fundamental rights to equality, life and personality, which is guaranteed under part III of the Constitution of India.
    • It also functions as an effective instrument for changes in the society or social welfare.
    • Through PIL, any public or person can seek remedy on behalf of the oppressed class by introducing a PIL.

    Issues with PIL

    • Off late, PILs have become a tool for publicity.
    • People file frivolous petitions which result in the wastage of time of the courts.
    • People have used them with a political agenda as well.
    • They unnecessarily burden the judiciary.
    • Even if the petition is eventually dismissed, the courts spend time and effort on them before dismissing them.

    How do frivolous petitions waste time?

    • At present, only judges have the power to dismiss a petition.
    • The Registry of the SC or HC only ensures that the technical requirements of filing a petition are fulfilled.
    • As a result of which petitions are admitted to the court irrespective of the merits of the case.

    Way forward: Preventing frivolous PILs

    The Supreme Court had issued eight directions in its Balwant Singh Chaufal Judgment to help constitutional courts separate genuine PIL petitions from the barmy ones:

    • It had asked every High Court to frame its own rules to encourage bona fide PIL petitions and curb the motivated ones
    • Verifying the credentials of the petitioner before entertaining the plea
    • Checking the correctness of the contents
    • Ensuring the petition involves issues of “larger public interest, gravity and urgency” which requires priority
    • Ensuring there is no personal gain, or oblique motive behind the PIL
    • Ensuring that it is aimed at redressal of genuine public harm or public injury

    Conclusion

    • PIL petitions have had a beneficial effect on the Indian jurisprudence and has alleviated the conditions of the citizens in general.
    • Such petitions bring justice to people who are handicapped by ignorance, indigence, illiteracy.

     

     

    UPSC 2023 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)