💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (August Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

GS Paper: GS3-03.Government Budgeting

  • Explain how the Fiscal Health Index (FHI) can be used as a tool for assessing the fiscal performance of states in India. In what way would it encourage the states to adopt prudent and sustainable fiscal policies?

    The Fiscal Health Index (FHI) initiative by NITI Aayog evaluates the fiscal health of eighteen major states through a composite index using data from the CAG, covering the Financial Year 2022-23.

    FHI as a tool to assess fiscal performance of states

    FHI uses uniform metrics-Tax Buoyancy, Debt-to-GSDP, Fiscal Deficit, Capex Share-allowing objective comparison across states.

    Multi-dimensional Evaluation – Covers five pillars and reveal structural strengths and weakness

    Measures states’ ability to mobilise resources through Own Tax Revenue (OTR) and Own Non-tax Revenue (ONTR). Eg – Higher OTR-to-GSDP ratio reflects stronger fiscal autonomy.

    Measures Quality of Expenditure – FHI differentiates between capital expenditure and revenue expenditure. Eg – States like Gujarat and Karnataka show higher capex ratios.

    Tracks Debt Sustainability – Assesses Debt-GSDP ratio, interest payment burden, and future liabilities. Eg – FHI flags high-debt states such as Punjab, Kerala, Rajasthan, and West Bengal.

    Monitors Fiscal Deficit and Compliance with FRBM Limits – Shows whether states adhere to 3% fiscal deficit glide path.

    Identifies Risk from Off-Budget Borrowings – Captures liabilities from power sector guarantees, state PSUs, and special purpose vehicles.

    Highlights Best Practices – Eg- Top states-Odisha (67.8 score), Chhattisgarh, Goa-show strong non-tax revenue, low fiscal deficits, and high capital outlays

    Role of FHI in Encouraging prudent and sustainable fiscal policies

    Promotes Fiscal Discipline – Poor rankings push states to reduce deficits and unsustainable borrowing.

    Incentivises Capital Spending – Encourages a shift from populist revenue expenditure towards productive capital outlay.

    Supports Long-Term Planning – Aligns state finances with sustainable development goals and resilience-building.

    Revenue Reforms-Stimulates states to improve tax buoyancy, and non-tax revenue mobilisation

    Drives Structural Reforms like subsidy rationalization, reduction in revenue leakages etc.

    Transparency & Accountability – Public scrutiny builds pressure on governments for fiscal prudence

    Encourages Inter-State Competition – Rankings foster a competitive spirit to achieve stronger fiscal performance.

    Strengthens Cooperative Federalism – Helps in Centre-State dialogue on shared fiscal risks and sustainability.

    Boosts Investor Confidence – Strong fiscal performance signals creditworthiness, attracting investment.

    Promotes Sustainable Borrowing Practices and enhances creditworthiness as better FHI improves a state’s credit rating.

    Challenges

    Data Gaps – CAG data of Financial Year 2022-23 used

    Off-budget borrowings not fully captured in FHI.

    Miss qualitative aspects such as governance quality, efficiency of welfare delivery etc.

    Inter-State Structural Variations are not fully captured – Eg- Resource-rich states (Odisha, Chhattisgarh) naturally perform better in non-tax revenues

    Competitive Populism reduces focus on fiscal discipline. Eg- farm loan waivers

    Weak Enforcement – FHI rankings have no binding effect on policy behaviour.

    By encouraging disciplined, sustainable, and quality spending, FHI can help realise the vision of Viksit Bharat@2047

    Industrial Policy

  • DAC Grants AoN Worth ₹3.6 Lakh Crore for Rafale, P-8I and Major Defence Modernisation Push

    Why in the News?

    The Defence Acquisition Council chaired by Rajnath Singh has granted Acceptance of Necessity for defence procurement proposals worth about ₹3.6 lakh crore, including 114 Rafale fighter jets and six P-8I aircraft.

    About Defence Acquisition Council

    • Apex decision making body for capital procurement in the Ministry of Defence after the Kargil War of 1999.
    • Headed by the Defence Minister
    • Grants Acceptance of Necessity, which is the first formal step in defence procurement
    • Functions under the framework of the Defence Acquisition Procedure 2020

    Composition 

    • The council is chaired by the Defence Minister (Raksha Mantri). Key members include the Chief of Defence Staff, the three Service Chiefs (Army, Navy, Air Force), and the Defence Secretary, with the Deputy Chief of Defence Staff (Planning & Procurement) as Member Secretary.

    Key Points: Recent procurement proposals: 

    • Acceptance of Necessity (AoN): First stage of capital procurement approval under Defence Acquisition Procedure 2020.
    • Indian Air Force: 114 Rafale Multi Role Fighter Aircraft, combat missiles, and High Altitude Pseudo Satellite for ISR and ELINT roles.
    • Indian Navy: Six P-8I long range maritime reconnaissance aircraft for anti submarine warfare and maritime strike capability.
    • Indian Army: Procurement of Vibhav anti tank mines and overhaul of T-72, BMP II and armoured recovery vehicles.
    [2024] Consider the following aircraft: 1. Rafael 

    2. MiG-29 

    3. Tejas MK-1 

    How many of the above are considered fifth generation fighter aircraft? 

    (a) Only one (b) Only two (c) All three (d) None

  • How did the space sector fare in the budget?

    Why in the News

    The Union Budget shows stable funding for the space sector after post-pandemic adjustments, following a 182% increase in allocations over the last decade. This reflects a shift from rapid expansion to fiscal consolidation. For the current year, the Budget has maintained broadly similar allocations for space activities, ensuring continuity for ISRO’s core programmes rather than announcing a major increase. However, industry bodies such as SatCom Industry Association (SIA)-India and Indian Space Association (ISpa) note that this stability has come without structural reforms, particularly in GST rationalisation, downstream enablement, and private sector incentives. The article highlights a gap between India’s space liberalisation framework, led by IN-SPACe, and the limited fiscal and regulatory support provided in the Budget.

    Has budgetary support for the space sector stabilised?

    1. Stabilised Allocations: Reflect a post-pandemic correction after a 182% increase in space spending over the past decade, signalling fiscal consolidation rather than retrenchment.
    2. Institutional Continuity: Ensures operational stability for ISRO, whose budget had earlier faced compression during COVID-19 years.
    3. Limited Expansion Signal: Indicates absence of new large-scale mission announcements or funding surges, reinforcing a maintenance-oriented fiscal posture.

    Does the Budget address structural reforms in the space ecosystem?

    1. Reform Gap: Ignores long-standing demands raised by SIA-India for taxation and policy rationalisation to support private and downstream firms.
    2. Public-sector Bias: Continues to prioritise ISRO’s upstream capabilities while underplaying ecosystem-wide enablement.
    3. Missed Alignment: Fails to integrate fiscal measures with the institutional role of IN-SPACe, which was created precisely to facilitate private participation.

    How does GST affect space industry competitiveness?

    1. GST Burden: High GST incidence on specialised inputs and imported components raises production costs for satellite and launch manufacturers.
    2. Cash-flow Stress: Refund delays under GST disproportionately affect private firms and startups operating under thin margins.
    3. Export Competitiveness: Weakens India’s cost advantage in global launch and satellite service markets, a concern explicitly flagged by industry bodies.

    What challenges exist for downstream space applications?

    1. Neglect of Applications: Budgetary focus remains skewed towards upstream launch and satellite programmes, with minimal fiscal support for applications.
    2. Commercial Bottlenecks: Affects communication, navigation, earth observation, and data analytics sectors that rely on satellite services.
    3. Innovation Constraints: Absence of PLI-type incentives for space manufacturing and services limits scale-up and market absorption.

    Is private participation adequately supported?

    1. Policy-Finance Disconnect: While liberalisation has been institutionalised through IN-SPACe, fiscal incentives remain absent.
    2. Investment Uncertainty: The Budget does not build upon the ₹1,000 crore venture capital fund announced in the previous Budget, offering no clarity on deployment or expansion.
    3. Ecosystem Imbalance: Growth remains anchored to state-led capabilities rather than a diversified commercial space economy.

    Conclusion

    The Budget secures stability for India’s space programme but does not translate liberalisation intent into fiscal or regulatory support. By overlooking GST reform, downstream incentives, and private investment facilitation, it risks slowing the transition from an ISRO-centric model to a competitive, market-driven space economy.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2016] Discuss India’s achievements in the field of Space Science and Technology. How has the application of this technology helped India in its socio-economic development?

    Linkage: Space science and technology is a recurring GS-III theme, testing India’s indigenous technological capacity and its role in national development. The current Budget debate on space highlights the shift from mission achievements to ecosystem sustainability, making the socio-economic application and commercialisation of space technologies a critical evaluative dimension.

  • Rare Earth Corridors in Coastal States

    Why in the News?

    In Union Budget 2026-27, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman announced the establishment of dedicated Rare Earth Corridors in the coastal states of Odisha, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu to strengthen India’s critical minerals and advanced manufacturing ecosystem.

    What are Rare Earth Corridors?

    • State focused industrial corridors for Mining, Processing, Research andManufacturing of rare earth elements
    • Aim to integrate upstream mining with downstream value addition
    • Anchored in mineral rich coastal regions with Beach Sand Minerals

    Rare Earths in Indian Context

    • Principal source: Beach Sand Minerals (BSM)
    • Key mineral present: Monazite
      • A phosphate mineral
      • Contains Uranium and Thorium
    • Coastal states have rich deposits capable of producing rare earths like Neodymium and Praseodymium

    Link with Rare Earth Magnet Manufacturing Scheme

    • Corridors align with the scheme for Sintered Rare Earth Permanent Magnets
    • Financial outlay: Rs 7,280 crore
    • Target capacity:
      • 6,000 metric tonnes per annum
      • 5 beneficiaries selected via competitive bidding
      • Up to 1,200 MTPA per beneficiary
    • Incentives:
      • Rs 6,450 crore sales linked incentive over 5 years
      • Rs 750 crore capital subsidy

    Why Rare Earth Permanent Magnets Matter

    • Critical for: Electric vehicles, Wind turbines and renewable energy, Electronics and Aerospace and defence.
    • Global concentration: China controls over 90 percent of processing and magnet manufacturing
    • India imported over 53,000 metric tonnes of rare earth magnets in FY 2024-25
    • Domestic demand expected to double by 2030
    [2022] With reference to India, consider the following statements: 1. Monazite is a source of rare earths

    2. Monazite contains thorium

    3. Monazite occurs naturally in the entire Indian coastal sands in India

    4. In India, Government bodies only can process or export monazite

    Which of the statements given above are correct? 

    (a) 1, 2 and 3 only (b) 1, 2 and 4 only (c) 3 and 4 only (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4

  • Biopharma Shakti Mission 

    Why in the News?

    In Union Budget 2026, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman announced the Biopharma Shakti Mission with an outlay of Rs 10,000 crore to make India a global hub for biologics and biosimilars.

    What is Biopharma Shakti Mission?

    A flagship mission to build a complete ecosystem for domestic manufacturing, clinical trials, and regulatory capacity in complex biological drugs.

    Key Features

    • Financial outlay: Rs 10,000 crore over 5 years
    • Focus areas: Biologics and biosimilars for NCDs like diabetes, cancer, autoimmune disorders
    • Infrastructure push:
      • 3 new NIPERs to be set up
      • 7 existing NIPERs to be upgraded
    • Clinical trials:
      • Network of 1,000 accredited clinical trial sites
      • Aims to capture a share of the global clinical trials market
    • Regulatory strengthening:
      • Capacity enhancement of Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation
      • Creation of a dedicated scientific review cadre
      • Alignment with global drug approval timelines

    Significance

    • Supports India’s transition from small molecule generics to next generation biologics
    • Addresses rising non communicable disease burden
    • Improves affordable access to advanced therapies
    • Boosts export competitiveness and global trust in Indian pharma

    Institutions in Focus

    • National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research
    • CDSCO as the national drug regulator aligned to global standards
    [2025] With reference to monoclonal antibodies, consider the following: 1. They are man-made proteins

    2. They stimulate the patient’s immune system to fight the specific disease

    3. They are produced using animal cells only

    Which of the statements given above are correct? 

    (a) I and II only (b) II and III only (c) I and III only (d) All the three

  • [2nd February 2026] The Hindu OpED: Union Budget 2026-27: Pushing welfare towards the States

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2024] What changes has the Union Government recently introduced in the domain of Centre-State relations? Suggest measures to be adopted to build the trust between the Centre and the States and for strengthening federalism.

    Linkage: The question addresses evolving Centre-State relations, focusing on fiscal federalism, trust deficit, and the balance between autonomy and accountability in India’s federal structure. The article illustrates this shift through the Centre’s reduced welfare spending and increased reliance on States for social-sector delivery without proportional fiscal empowerment.

    Mentor’s Comment

    There is a clear shift in India’s welfare system. Budget 2026-27 shows that States are being made more responsible for welfare spending, while the Union government continues to set rules and standards. It raises concerns about reduced social-sector spending, limited fiscal capacity of States, and unequal governance. The issue is important for GS-II and GS-III as it links fiscal federalism, social justice, public finance, and welfare delivery.

    Why in the News?

    Budget 2026-27 reflects an unusual pattern: despite the absence of new flagship schemes, allocations for core welfare sectors remain low and, in several cases, under-spent. For the first time in recent years, there is a clear shift of welfare burden towards States, while the Centre retains control through legislation and standards. This contrast between decentralised spending responsibility and centralised policy authority marks a significant departure from earlier centrally driven welfare expansion.

    Has social-sector spending lost priority in Budget 2026-27?

    1. Unchanged Social Sector Share: Maintains the same proportion of total expenditure as previous years, despite rising welfare needs.
    2. Health and Education Allocation: Registers a marginal increase of 4% in 2026-27 BE, which translates to only 2.3% growth in real terms after inflation.
    3. Below-Minimum Requirement: Requires at least 7% annual growth to sustain existing service levels, indicating effective stagnation.
    4. Under-Spending Trend: Budget Estimates (BE) consistently exceed Revised Estimates (RE), showing that even allocated funds remain unspent.

    Which welfare schemes are witnessing the sharpest decline?

    1. Urban Livelihoods (DAY-NULM): Allocation reduced by 41%, reflecting declining focus on urban poor employment.
    2. Rural Development: Faces a 20% reduction, weakening livelihood and asset-creation programmes.
    3. North-East Development: Allocation falls by 24%, affecting regional equity.
    4. Social Welfare Programmes: Experience broad-based contraction across sectors.
    5. Jal Jeevan Mission: Allocation drops from ₹67,000 crore in 2025-26 BE to ₹35,000 crore in 2026-27 BE.
    6. PMAY-Urban: Reduced from ₹54,832 crore (RE) to ₹45,482 crore (BE).
    7. PMAY-Rural: Declines from ₹79,794 crore to ₹54,832 crore.
    8. Education Schemes (CSS): Fall from ₹5,41,850 crore in 2025-26 BE to ₹4,20,078 crore in 2026-27 BE.
    9. Health Schemes: Reduced from ₹5,48,798 crore to ₹4,57,498 crore.

    Is the emphasis on capital expenditure displacing welfare priorities?

    1. Capex Bias: Prioritises infrastructure spending over social consumption.
    2. Demand Constraint: Weak purchasing power limits the multiplier effect of capex.
    3. Employment Impact: Fails to generate sufficient jobs, particularly for educated youth.
    4. Private Investment Response: Remains muted, questioning capex-led growth assumptions.
    5. Economic Slackness: Over ₹12 lakh crore remains unspent or underutilised in the economy.

    How is the welfare burden shifting towards the States?

    1. Budget Consolidation: Budget 2026-27 formalises the transfer of welfare responsibility to States.
    2. Centre’s Role: Continues norm-setting through legislation, while reducing direct spending.
    3. Increased State Share: States now bear a larger proportion of social-sector expenditure.
    4. Revenue Constraint: States receive only around 34% of net tax revenues.
    5. Finance Commission Signal: Recommends reduced cesses and surcharges, yet these continue.
    6. Vertical Imbalance: Centre’s tax dominance contrasts with States’ spending obligations.

    Do States have the fiscal capacity to absorb this shift?

    1. Limited Revenue Autonomy: States remain dependent on Central transfers.
    2. Declining Share: States’ share in Central taxes has fallen from ₹1,32,767 crore (2025-26 BE) to ₹1,29,397 crore (2026-27 BE).
    3. Expenditure Pressure: Welfare responsibilities expand without commensurate fiscal space.
    4. Governance Risk: Uneven capacity among States risks regional disparities in welfare outcomes.

    What governance challenges persist in welfare delivery?

    1. Demand-Side Weakness: Poor purchasing power suppresses welfare impact.
    2. Supply-Side Gaps: Inadequate public provisioning persists.
    3. Human Capital Stress: Education and health underinvestment affects long-term productivity.
    4. Structural Unemployment: Skills mismatch remains unresolved.
    5. Income Stagnation: Low wages constrain inclusive growth.

    Conclusion

    As the Centre withdraws from direct welfare spending while retaining legislative authority, States are left managing rising social obligations with constrained fiscal capacity. Without correcting this imbalance, welfare delivery risks becoming uneven, under-funded, and ineffective.

  • Union Budget 2026–27 

    Why in the News?

    The Union Budget of India for 2026–27 was presented on 1 February 2026 by Nirmala Sitharaman, focusing on Yuva Shakti, inclusive growth and long term economic resilience.

    Budget Theme and Vision

    • Yuva Shakti driven Budget with focus on poor, underprivileged and disadvantaged
    • First Budget prepared in Kartavya Bhawan
    • Anchored on 3 Kartavya
      • Accelerate and sustain economic growth
      • Fulfil aspirations and build capacity
      • Sabka Sath Sabka Vikas towards Viksit Bharat

    Major Economic and Fiscal Announcements

    • Public Capex increased to ₹12.2 lakh crore in FY 2026–27
    • Fiscal deficit targeted at 4.3 percent of GDP
    • Debt to GDP ratio projected at 55.6 percent
    • Net market borrowing at ₹11.7 lakh crore

    Taxation Reforms

    Direct Taxes

    • New Income Tax Act, 2025 effective from April 2026
    • Simplified income tax rules and forms
    • TCS on overseas tour packages reduced to 2 percent
    • STT on futures increased to 0.05 percent
    • MAT rate reduced to 14 percent and made final tax
    • Multiplicity of penalty and prosecution proceedings reduced

    Support to IT and Global Investment

    • Single category of IT Services with safe harbour margin of 15.5 percent
    • Safe harbour threshold raised to ₹2,000 crore
    • Foreign cloud service providers to get tax holiday till 2047
    • MAT exemption to all non residents paying tax on presumptive basis

    Indirect Taxes and Customs

    • Basic customs duty exemption
      • Capital goods for lithium ion batteries
      • Critical minerals processing equipment
      • 17 drugs and medicines
    • Tariff on personal imports reduced from 20 percent to 10 percent
    • Customs warehousing shifted to operator centric digital system
    • Single digital window for cargo clearance by end of financial year

    Sector Specific Highlights

    Manufacturing and MSMEs

    • ₹10,000 crore SME [Small and Medium Enterprises] Growth Fund
    • Scaling manufacturing in 7 strategic sectors
    • Textile sector integrated programme including Samarth 2.0

    Infrastructure and Transport

    • Seven high speed rail corridors as growth connectors
    • New Dedicated Freight Corridors
    • Operationalisation of 20 National Waterways

    Health, Education and Social Sector

    • Biopharma SHAKTI with outlay of ₹10,000 crore
    • One girls hostel in every district for STEM institutions
    • Medical tourism hubs in partnership with private sector
    • NIMHANS 2 and mental health institutes upgrade

    Technology and AI

    • Bharat VISTAAR multilingual AI tool for agriculture
    • AVGC content creator labs in 15,000 schools and 500 colleges

    Sports and Tourism

    • Launch of Khelo India Mission
    • Upskilling 10,000 tourist guides
    • Buddhist Circuit development in North East
    [2024] With reference to Union Budget, consider the following statements: 

    1. The Union Finance Minister on behalf of the Prime Minister lays the Annual Financial Statement before both the Houses of Parliament

    2. At the Union level, no demand for a grant can be made except on the recommendation of the President of India

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct? 

    (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2

  • Why the rupee has a capital account problem

    Why in the news

    The rupee’s recent fall is not driven by a widening current account deficit, as traditionally believed, but by an unprecedented decline in net foreign capital inflows, which have turned sharply negative for the first time in years. During April-September 2025, India saw a net outflow of $7.6 billion, a stark reversal from the $25.3 billion net inflow in the same period of 2024. This contrast signals a structural shift where India’s strong services surplus can no longer offset the sharp rise in the goods deficit alongside shrinking foreign investments, making this a serious macroeconomic turning point

    Introduction

    India’s external sector is undergoing a structural change where the merchandise trade deficit continues to expand, the invisibles surplus remains strong, but the capital account, especially foreign investment inflows, has weakened significantly. As a result, the rupee’s pressure today arises primarily from capital account weakness, not the current account alone, reshaping India’s macroeconomic stability narrative.

    Why is India’s current account under persistent pressure?

    1. Widening Merchandise Trade Deficit: India’s goods trade deficit more than doubled from $91.5 bn (2007-08) to $191 bn (2022-23) and is expected to cross $300 bn in 2024-25.
    2. Strong but Insufficient Invisibles Surplus: Remittances, software exports and professional services push invisibles surplus to record highs, yet not enough to neutralise the merchandise gap.
    3. Sticky Imports & Slow Exports: Energy, electronics, and gold imports remain elevated; global demand conditions weaken export earnings.

    How have invisibles cushioned the external sector so far?

    1. Record Remittances: Private transfers and remittances remain robust—India continues as a top global recipient.
    2. Soaring Software & IT Services Surplus: Services exports support the current account and contribute to India’s “invisible strength.”
    3. Investment Income Outflows: Rising payments on interest/dividends reduce the net benefit of the invisibles surplus.

    What explains India’s capital account problem today?

    1. Sharp Fall in Net Capital Inflows: April-September 2025 saw $7.6 bn net outflow vs $25.3 bn inflow in 2024, the biggest recent reversal.
    2. Weakening Foreign Investment: FDI inflows into new factories, infrastructure, and physical assets have dropped sharply.
      1. FDI: $43 bn (2020-21), $22 bn (2022-23),  $8 bn (2023-24) till December.
    3. Portfolio Flows Turning Volatile: FY23-24 saw equity outflows of $23 bn, reversing the earlier inflow phase.
    4. India’s Relative Growth Advantage Narrowing: High global interest rates and stronger USD attract capital away.

    Why does the rupee weaken despite manageable CAD?

    1. Capital Outflows Overpower CAD Position: Even a moderate CAD becomes hard to finance when capital inflows dry up.
    2. Pressure from USD Shift: Rupee slid from ₹83.47 to ₹89.39 per USD within the year as yen, won, and yuan also weakened.
    3. Financing Gap: CAD remains dependent on capital inflows, weak capital flows lead to excess demand for foreign currency.

    What are the macroeconomic consequences of the capital account strain?

    1. External Financing Stress: Lower FDI and portfolio inflows reduce India’s ability to fund domestic growth.
    2. Exchange Rate Volatility: Persistent rupee pressure increases import costs, especially energy and intermediate goods.
    3. Growth Impact: Rupee weakness raises inflationary pressures and complicates monetary policy management.
    4. Policy Trade-offs: RBI must balance FX stability, inflation control, and capital flow management.

    CONCLUSION

    India’s external account stresses now stem less from trade imbalances and more from capital inflow shortages. A resilient services surplus continues to stabilise the CAD, but declining foreign investments, both FDI and portfolio, expose the currency to sharper volatility. Addressing this requires strengthening domestic manufacturing competitiveness, improving investment climate, and ensuring predictable macroeconomic policies that reclaim India’s attractiveness for global capital.

    UPSC Relevance

    [UPSC 2021] Do you agree that the Indian economy has recently experienced V-shaped recovery? Give reasons in support of your answer.

    Linkage: Capital account inflows, forex stability, and investment revival are key determinants of macroeconomic recovery. The article’s data on shrinking capital inflows and rupee pressures directly challenge the sustainability of a V-shaped path.

  • ED Notice to Kerala CM: KIIFB Masala Bonds Case 

    Why in the news?

    The Enforcement Directorate’s (ED) notice to Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan and senior officials in the KIIFB masala bond case has revived debates on FEMA compliance, off-budget borrowings, and Centre–State fiscal relations. As local body polls approach, the issue has also acquired political significance.

    What is KIIFB?  

    Kerala Infrastructure Investment Fund Board (KIIFB)

    • Statutory body established under KIIF Act, 1999
    • Revived in 2016 as Kerala’s key infrastructure financing arm
    • Raises funds outside the State budget, mainly through long-term borrowing
    • Functions as an off-budget financing mechanism

    What is Off-Budget Borrowing?

    • Debt raised by state entities (SPVs, boards) instead of the government directly
    • Not reflected in the official fiscal deficit
    • CAG has criticised such borrowings for reducing transparency

    What Are Masala Bonds?  

    Masala Bonds =

    • Rupee-denominated bonds issued in overseas markets
    • Borrowing risk is borne by the investor, not the issuer
    • Governed by RBI’s External Commercial Borrowing (ECB) Framework

    KIIFB Masala Bond:

    • Issued in 2019 on the London Stock Exchange
    • Total amount: ₹2,150 crore
    • First sub-national entity in India to issue such a bond

    Why Did ED Issue Notices?

    ED’s probe relates to alleged violations under:FEMA, 1999 – Foreign Exchange Management Act

    ED claims: Part of the masala bond funds was used for land purchase. RBI prohibits land purchase using ECB/masala bond proceeds

    Kerala’s defence:

    • Land was acquired, not purchased
    • Public land acquisition does not violate FEMA or RBI norms

    Enforcement Directorate (ED)

    • Established under DOF Notification (1956)
    • Investigates:
      • PMLA, 2002
      • FEMA, 1999
      • Economic offences referred by other agencies
    • Works under Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance

    CAG (Comptroller and Auditor General of India)

    • Constitutional body under Article 148
    • Criticised KIIFB borrowings as off-budget liabilities
    With reference to ‘IFC Masala Bonds’, sometimes seen in the news, which of the statements given below is/are correct? (2016)

    1. The International Finance Corporation, which offers these bonds, is an arm of the World Bank. 

    2. They are the rupee-denominated bonds and are a source of debt financing for the public and private sector. 

    Select the correct answer using the code given below. 

    (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2

  • Capital Gains Accounts (Second Amendment) Scheme, 2025

    Why in the news? 

    The Ministry of Finance has notified the Capital Gains Accounts (Second Amendment) Scheme, 2025, introducing major changes to the existing Capital Gains Account Scheme (CGAS), 1988. The amendments aim to modernise processes, expand banking access, and increase clarity for taxpayers seeking capital gains exemptions.

    About Capital Gains Account Scheme (CGAS), 1988

    • Launched by the Central Government in 1988.
    • Objective: To help taxpayers claim exemptions on long-term capital gains when reinvestment cannot be completed before the ITR filing due date.
    • Linked mainly to Section 54, 54F, and related provisions of the Income Tax Act.

    Why CGAS is Needed?

    • Exemption requires reinvestment of capital gains within:
      • 2 years (purchase of property)
      • 3 years (construction of property)
    • If this period extends beyond the ITR filing deadline, the taxpayer can temporarily deposit unutilised gains in CGAS to keep the exemption claim valid.

    Important Conditions

    • Deposit must be made before filing Income Tax Return.
    • Money deposited is treated as reinvested for exemption.
    • If the amount is not utilised within the stipulated period, it becomes taxable long-term capital gains in that year.
    • Only long-term capital gains qualify — short-term gains are NOT eligible.

    Who Can Deposit in CGAS?

    • Any person with long-term capital gains, including: Individuals, HUFs, Companies, Firms, Trusts, and Any eligible taxpayer seeking exemption
    • Mainly used by property sellers who need more time to reinvest.

    Capital Gains Accounts (Second Amendment) Scheme, 2025 — Key Changes

    • Expansion of Authorized Banks: Previously limited mostly to Public Sector Banks + IDBI Bank.
      • Now extended to 19 private and small finance banks at all non-rural branches.
    • Non-rural branch condition: Branch must be located in an area with population ≥ 10,000 (2011 Census).
      • Rural branches cannot open CGAS accounts.
    • Wider Definition of Electronic Payments: Electronic deposits can now be made through: Credit cards, Debit cards, Net banking, IMPS, UPI, RTGS, NEFT and BHIM Aadhaar Pay.This modernises the earlier narrow definition of “electronic mode”.
    • Online Closure of CGAS Accounts (From April 1, 2027): Closure requests can be submitted electronically using:
      • Digital Signature (DSC)
      • Electronic Verification Code (EVC)
      • Earlier: Closure only through physical branches.
    • Clarification on Effective Date of Deposit: For cheque/DD/electronic transfers, the date of receipt of the payment instrument along with account application at the Deposit Office is treated as the effective date.Removes ambiguity around last-day deposits for tax exemption.
    • Electronic Statements Permitted: Banks can now issue electronic statements instead of physical passbooks.
      • Aligns CGAS with general digital banking norms.
    •  Extension of CGAS to Section 54GA: CGAS can now be used for exemptions under Section 54GA:

      • Relates to capital gains arising from shifting an industrial undertaking from an urban area to a Special Economic Zone (SEZ).
      • Broadens applicability beyond property-related reinvestments.
    Consider the following statements: (2025)

    I. Capital receipts create a liability or cause a reduction in the assets of the Government. 

    II. Borrowings and disinvestment are capital receipts. 

    III. Interest received on loans creates a liability of the Government. 

    Which of the statements given above are correct? 

    (a) I and II only 

    (b) II and III only 

    (c) I and III only 

    (d) I, II and III