💥Mains Ready By December. Smash Mains & Smash PYQ Admissions Open
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

GS Paper: GS2

  • [pib] UN Committee of Experts on Big Data and Data Science for Official Statistics (UN-CEBD)

    Why in the News?

    India has joined the prestigious UN Committee of Experts on Big Data and Data Science for Official Statistics (UN-CEBD).

    About UN-CEBD

    Details
    • Established in 2014 during the 45th session of the UN Statistical Commission.
    • First Chair: Australia.
    • Explores the potential of big data and data science in transforming official statistics.
    • Monitors progress toward Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) using innovative data sources.
    Structural Mandate and Implementation Mandate:

    • Develop global programs for using big data in official statistics.
    • Monitor SDG indicators using advanced data science.
    • Address challenges like cross-border data sharing and ethical concerns.

    Governance Structure:

    • Advisory Board: Strategic oversight and guidance.
    • UN Bureau: Handles operational tasks.

    Implementation Mechanism:

    • Capacity building through training.
    • Promote global collaboration and innovation.
    Powers and Functions
    • Strategic Vision: Integrate big data into national/international statistical systems.
    • Practical Use: Utilize non-traditional data sources like IoT, satellite imagery, and private sector data.
    • Capacity Building: Train statisticians in data science techniques.
    • Global Standards: Develop frameworks for cross-border data sharing and ethical practices.
    • Policy Integration: Advocate for data-driven policymaking.
    Why India Joined?
    • Enhancing Statistical Capabilities: Modernize processes with IoT, satellite imagery, etc.
    • Global Collaboration: Share innovations like the Data Innovation Lab and learn best practices.
    • SDG Monitoring: Leverage big data for robust tracking of SDGs.
    • Showcasing Leadership: Strengthen India’s position in global data governance.
    • Economic and Policy Benefits: Enable evidence-based decisions to address socio-economic challenges.

  • INTERPOL publishes first Silver Notice targeting criminal assets

    Why in the News?

    The International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL) has issued a Silver Notice to trace and recover criminal assets, marking the first expansion of its color-coded notices to specifically target the finances of organized crime networks.

    What is Silver Notice?

    • It is an INTERPOL initiative aimed at tracing, locating, and recovering criminal assets linked to crimes such as fraud, corruption, drug trafficking, and environmental offenses.
    • Objective: It targets assets like properties, vehicles, financial accounts, and businesses that are connected to criminal activities.
    • It was launched in 2023 as part of a pilot phase involving 52 countries, and this phase will run until November 2025.
    • How does it work?
      • Member countries can request INTERPOL to issue a Silver Notice for assistance in gathering information about criminal assets.
      • The Notice is shared globally with all 196 INTERPOL member countries, while Diffusions can be directed to specific countries for more targeted cooperation.
      • All Silver Notices and Diffusions are reviewed by INTERPOL’s General Secretariat to ensure compliance with its rules, including prohibitions on political misuse as outlined in Article 3 of the INTERPOL Constitution.
      • The first-ever Silver Notice was requested by Italy to trace assets linked to a senior mafia member, showcasing its potential to combat organized crime.

    INTERPOL publishes first Silver Notice targeting criminal assets

    About INTERPOL

    Structural Mandate and Implementation
    • Establishment: Founded in 1923 in Vienna, now headquartered in Lyon, France, with 195 member countries.
    • Mandate: Supports cross-border police cooperation, helping agencies combat international crime.
    • India became a member of INTERPOL in June 1956.

    Structural Mandate:

    • Secretary General: Oversees daily operations.
    • General Secretariat (Lyon): Manages global databases and police communication systems.
    • Global Complex for Innovation (Singapore): Research, training, and cybercrime initiatives.
    • Regional Bureaus: Satellite offices worldwide.
    • National Central Bureaus (NCBs): Each member country, such as India’s CBI, serves as its national focal point for INTERPOL.
    • I-24/7 Service: A secure global police communication system enabling real-time sharing of urgent and sensitive information.
    Powers and Functions
    • Data Sharing: Manages 19 police databases on crimes and criminals, accessible in real-time by member countries.
    • Notices and Diffusions: Issues color-coded notices (e.g., Red, Yellow, Blue, Silver) to locate fugitives, missing persons, or criminal assets; not legally binding but widely used by law enforcement.

    Operational Support:
    – Investigative Assistance: Provides forensics, analysis, and fugitive-tracking support.
    – Coordination: Enables law enforcement agencies to handle transnational crime efficiently.

  • Indonesia officially joined BRICS as the 11th member

    Why in the News?

    Indonesia has officially joined BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) as a full member. This move was unanimously approved during the 2023 BRICS Summit in Johannesburg and announced by Brazil, which holds the presidency of BRICS in 2025.

    What is BRICS?

    • BRICS represents a coalition of nations committed to fostering economic growth, development cooperation, and global governance reform.
    • BRICS focuses on collaboration across 3 key pillars:
    1. Political and Security Cooperation: Ensuring peace, global stability, and governance reform.
    2. Economic and Financial Cooperation: Promoting trade, investment, and economic resilience.
    3. Cultural and People-to-People Cooperation: Enhancing mutual understanding and societal linkages.
    • Present Members of BRICS
      • Original Members: Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa.
      • Recent Additions: Indonesia, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, and the UAE.

    Indonesia has officially joined BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) as a full member. This move was unanimously approved during the 2023 BRICS Summit in Johannesburg and announced by Brazil, which holds the presidency of BRICS in 2025.

    Evolution of BRICS:

    • 2001: The term “BRIC” was coined by Jim O’Neill, an economist at Goldman Sachs, in a report highlighting Brazil, Russia, India, and China as fast-growing economies.
    • 2006: BRIC leaders held their first meeting during the G8 Outreach Summit in St. Petersburg, Russia.
    • 2009: The first BRIC Summit was held in Yekaterinburg, Russia, to formalize the grouping.
    • 2010: South Africa joined, transforming BRIC into BRICS.
    • 2014 Fortaleza Declaration: The establishment of the New Development Bank (NDB) and Contingent Reserve Arrangement (CRA) marked significant steps toward financial collaboration.
    • Recent Expansion: In 2023 Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, and the UAE joined, reflecting BRICS’ expanding influence in the Global South.
    • 2025: Indonesia officially joins.

    Significance of BRICS:

    • Economic Growth: Acts as a significant driver of global economic growth, contributing 24% of global GDP and over 16% of global trade.
    • Multipolar World Advocacy: Promotes a multipolar world order, challenging Western dominance in global governance.
    • South-South Cooperation: Strengthens collaboration among developing nations, addressing shared issues like poverty and climate change.
    • Alternative Financial Systems: Explores mechanisms like the New Development Bank (NDB) and Contingent Reserve Arrangement (CRA) to reduce reliance on Western financial institutions and the US dollar.

    Challenges Faced by BRICS:

    • Diverging Interests: Members have differing priorities, such as India-China tensions and varying stances on global issues.
    • Economic Disparities: Wide differences in economic size and capacity, with China dominating BRICS GDP.
    • Institutional Weakness: Absence of a formal structure and binding agreements limits the bloc’s effectiveness.
    • Geopolitical Pressures: External challenges like Western sanctions on Russia and US-China tensions test BRICS’ cohesion and neutrality.

    PYQ:

    [2014]  With reference to a grouping of countries known as BRICS, consider the following statements:

    1. The First Summit of BRICS was held in Rio de Janeiro in 2009.

    2. South Africa was the last to join the BRICS grouping.

    Which of the statements given above is / are correct?

    (a) 1 only

    (b) 2 only

    (c) Both 1 and 2

    (d) Neither 1 nor 2

  • Mapping: Gulf of Mexico

    Mapping: Gulf of Mexico

    Why in the News?

    Donald Trump has proposed to change the name of the Gulf of Mexico to the “Gulf of America” after his plans for purchasing Greenland.

    About the Gulf of Mexico

    • The Gulf of Mexico is a marginal sea of the Atlantic Ocean.
    • It is bordered by:
      • United States: States of Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas.
      • Mexico: Eastern coast, including the Yucatán Peninsula.
      • Cuba: Southeastern boundary.
    • It is believed to have formed around 300 million years ago during the late Paleozoic era.
    • Its formation is linked to the breakup of the supercontinent Pangaea.
    • The Gulf has a subtropical to tropical climate.
    • It is prone to hurricanes and tropical storms
    • The Gulf is one of the world’s most significant oil-producing regions. It contains over 17% of global proven petroleum reserves.

    Strategic Location:

    • The Gulf is a crucial artery for international shipping, particularly between the Americas and Europe.
    • It connects to the Caribbean Sea and Atlantic Ocean through the Straits of Florida and to the Pacific Ocean via the Panama Canal.
    • The Gulf serves as a key area for U.S. naval operations.

  • Section 152 of BNS should not become a proxy for sedition

    Why in the News?

    In the 2024 case of Tejender Pal Singh v. State of Rajasthan, the Rajasthan High Court warned that Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) should not be misused to suppress valid criticism or peaceful dissent.

    What are the key differences between Section 152 of the BNS and Section 124A of the IPC?

    • Terminology and Scope:
      • Section 124A (IPC) specifically criminalizes acts that bring hatred or contempt towards the government, termed as sedition. It focuses on inciting disaffection against the government.
      • Section 152 (BNS) criminalizes acts that endanger the sovereignty, unity, and integrity of India, including inciting rebellion or promoting separatism. While it does not explicitly use the term “sedition,” it covers similar ground with broader language.
    • Penalties:
        • Section 124A prescribes a punishment of life imprisonment or a minimum of three years in prison, along with a possible fine.
        • Section 152 increases the potential penalty to life imprisonment or up to seven years, along with a mandatory fine, making it potentially more stringent.
    • Intent Requirement:
      • Section 124A requires proof of intent to incite disaffection.
      • Section 152 lowers this threshold by allowing prosecution if a person “knowingly” shares information that could incite rebellion or separatism, regardless of malicious intent.

    How does Section 152 impact freedom of speech and legitimate dissent?

    • Chilling Effect: The vagueness of what constitutes an act endangering sovereignty can lead to a chilling effect on free speech. Individuals may self-censor to avoid potential legal repercussions for expressing dissenting opinions or criticism of the government.
    • Potential for Abuse: The broad language and lack of clear definitions in Section 152 allow for expansive interpretation by enforcement authorities. This can result in legitimate expressions of dissent being criminalized under the guise of national security.
    • Judicial Oversight: The Rajasthan High Court emphasized that Section 152 should not be used as a tool to suppress dissent but rather as a protective measure for national security. It called for careful application and judicial oversight to ensure that legitimate criticism is not equated with sedition.

    What are the legal and constitutional implications of enforcing Section 152?

    • Constitutional Rights: Enforcing Section 152 raises concerns regarding violations of Articles 14 (Right to Equality) and 19 (Freedom of Speech) of the Indian Constitution. The vague definitions may lead to arbitrary enforcement, undermining individual rights and freedoms.
    • Judicial Precedents: The judiciary has historically favoured a consequentialist approach in interpreting laws related to free speech. Previous rulings have established that there must be a direct causal link between speech and its impact for it to constitute an offence. This precedent should guide the interpretation and enforcement of Section 152.
    • Need for Guidelines: There is an urgent need for the Supreme Court to establish clear guidelines regarding the application of Section 152, similar to those created in past cases. This would help delineate acceptable boundaries for criticism while protecting national interests without infringing on civil liberties.

    Way forward: 

    • Establish Clear Guidelines: The Supreme Court should set precise guidelines for applying Section 152 to ensure a balance between protecting national security and safeguarding freedom of speech, as done in past landmark cases.
    • Promote Judicial Oversight: Enforcement authorities should be required to demonstrate a direct and significant link between the speech and its impact, with courts actively monitoring cases to prevent misuse of the law against legitimate dissent.

    Mains PYQ:

    Q What do understand by the concept “freedom of speech and expression”? Does it cover hate speech also? Why do films in India stand on a slightly different plane from other forms of expression? Discuss. (UPSC IAS/2014)

  • Is India open to the idea of dual citizenship?

    Why in the News?

    Recently, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar said that there are many challenges in giving dual citizenship to Indians living abroad. He mentioned that the Overseas Citizenship of India program is a step towards addressing this need and added that the discussion about dual citizenship is still ongoing.

    What are the arguments for and against dual citizenship in India?

    Arguments Against Dual Citizenship:

    • Divided Loyalties: Critics argue that dual citizenship would lead to divided loyalties, undermining national integrity. Political rights granted to dual citizens could create conflicts of allegiance between India and another country, which is seen as dangerous for India’s sovereignty.
    • Legal Restrictions: The Indian Constitution mandates that acquiring citizenship in another country results in the automatic loss of Indian citizenship. This legal framework does not support dual citizenship, making it a complex issue to address.
    • Historical Context: The Citizenship Amendment Act of 2019 reflects a cautious approach to citizenship rights, emphasizing the need for complete loyalty to India and limiting the scope of citizenship to those who relinquish foreign nationality.

    Arguments For Dual Citizenship:

    • Global Integration: Proponents believe that allowing dual citizenship could strengthen ties between India and its diaspora, fostering economic and cultural exchanges in an increasingly globalized world.
    • Economic Contributions: There is a belief that dual citizenship could attract foreign investment and encourage Indian expatriates to contribute more significantly to India’s economy without the fear of losing their original nationality.

    How does India’s stance on dual citizenship compare with other democracies?

    • India’s Position on Dual Citizenship: According to Article 9 of the Indian Constitution, any Indian citizen who voluntarily acquires citizenship of another country ceases to be an Indian citizen. This is reinforced by the Citizenship Act of 1955, which outlines that Indian citizenship is singular and does not accommodate dual nationality.
    • Comparison with Other Democracies
      • United States: The U.S. has no restrictions on dual citizenship. Citizens can hold multiple nationalities without losing their U.S. citizenship. This reflects a more permissive approach towards allegiance and nationality.
      • Canada: Canada also allows dual citizenship and recognizes the right of its citizens to hold multiple nationalities. This policy facilitates a diverse and multicultural society.
      • Australia: Similar to Canada, Australia permits dual nationality and extends full consular assistance to its citizens regardless of their other nationalities.
      • Germany: Germany has specific regulations regarding dual citizenship, generally requiring individuals to choose one nationality unless they are EU citizens or meet certain conditions. This reflects a more nuanced approach than India’s outright prohibition.

    What are the current legal frameworks?

    • Overseas Citizenship of India (OCI): Introduced in 2005, OCI allows persons of Indian origin from certain countries to reside in India without a visa and grants them some rights akin to those of Non-Resident Indians (NRIs). However, OCIs do not have voting rights or the ability to hold constitutional offices.
    • Eligibility: The OCI scheme is available primarily to individuals who were citizens of India or eligible for Indian citizenship at the time of the Constitution’s commencement, excluding those from Pakistan and Bangladesh. It is contingent upon the individual’s home country allowing some form of dual citizenship.

    What are the challenges?

    • Political Loyalty Concerns: There is a prevalent fear that granting dual citizenship would lead to divided loyalties among citizens, particularly regarding political rights.
    • Public Sentiment and Political Will: There is significant public resistance against dual citizenship due to concerns about national security and sovereignty.
    • Complexity of Implementation: Implementing a dual citizenship framework would require substantial legal changes and could complicate India’s existing immigration and nationality laws. The challenge lies in balancing the interests of the diaspora with the need to maintain a cohesive national identity.

    Way forward: 

    • Gradual Legal Reforms: India could consider a phased approach to dual citizenship by first allowing it for specific categories such as diaspora members who maintain close economic or cultural ties with India, while ensuring that political rights remain exclusive to Indian citizens only.
    • Enhanced OCI Benefits: India could expand the rights of Overseas Citizens of India (OCI) holders, granting them more privileges such as the right to vote or hold certain offices, without granting full dual citizenship.

    Mains PYQ:

    Q ‘Indian diaspora has a decisive role to play in the politics and economy of America and European Countries’. Comment with examples. (UPSC IAS/2020)

  • Report on AI governance guidelines development

    Why in the News?

    A government panel has recommended forming an inter-ministerial committee to enforce AI rules and ensure effective governance of India’s growing AI ecosystem under India’s AI Mission.

    • The Government of India has allocated ₹10,372 crore for the recently launched IndiaAI Mission under the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology.

    What are the key issues highlighted by the Report?

    • Need for Coordinated Governance: The report emphasizes the necessity of a coordinated, whole-of-government approach for effective AI governance in India. It highlights that fragmentation in AI oversight across ministries may lead to inefficiencies and gaps.
    • Importance of Multi-disciplinary Expertise: The report underscores the importance of pooling together expertise from various departments, regulators, and stakeholders to manage AI’s evolving ecosystem. It suggests setting up a technical secretariat within the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) to facilitate this process.
    • Life Cycle and Ecosystem View: The report stresses the need for a life cycle approach to AI governance, addressing risks at different stages—development, deployment, and diffusion of AI systems. It advocates for an “ecosystem view” that considers various AI actors, including data providers, developers, and end users, for a holistic approach.
    • Light Regulatory Framework: The report advocates for a lightweight regulatory framework rather than a “command and control” approach. It proposes a tech-enabled digital governance system to gradually scale regulatory control, thus encouraging innovation while ensuring safety and accountability.
    • Sector-Specific Risks: It acknowledges that different sectors, such as health and banking, pose specific risks with AI systems. As such, a one-size-fits-all regulatory approach might not be effective in these areas.
    • Existing Laws for Specific Issues: The report refers to existing legal frameworks to address emerging issues like deepfakes and cybersecurity, reiterating that these concerns can be handled under current laws.

    What are the 8 Principles?

    • Transparency: AI systems must provide meaningful information about their development and capabilities, ensuring that stakeholders understand how they function.
    • Accountability: Developers and deployers of AI systems should be held accountable for their impacts, with clear organizational structures to identify responsible parties.
    • Safety, Reliability, and Robustness: AI systems should be designed to be safe and reliable, with safeguards in place to ensure they function as intended.
    • Privacy and Security: Protect user data privacy and ensure security measures are implemented to safeguard against unauthorized access.
    • Fairness and Non-Discrimination: AI systems must operate without bias, ensuring equitable treatment across different demographic groups.
    • Human-Centered Values: AI should align with human values, promoting positive outcomes for individuals and society while minimizing harm.
    • Inclusive Innovation: Encourage innovation that equitably distributes benefits across society, ensuring that advancements in AI do not exacerbate existing inequalities.
    • Digital Governance: Leverage digital technologies to operationalize governance principles effectively, facilitating compliance and oversight.

    What are the key recommendations?  (Way forward)

    • Establishment of an Inter-Ministerial AI Coordination Committee: This committee should serve as a permanent body to coordinate AI governance efforts across various national authorities and institutions, ensuring a unified approach to policy and regulation.
    • Creation of a Technical Secretariat: The Ministry of Electronics and IT (MeitY) should establish a technical secretariat to act as a focal point for coordination, providing technical advisory support and facilitating collaboration among stakeholders.
    • Development of an AI Incident Database: A central repository should be created to document real-world issues related to AI, such as discriminatory outputs and privacy violations, to inform risk assessments and harm mitigation strategies.
    • Promotion of Voluntary Transparency Commitments: The Technical Secretariat should engage with industry stakeholders to encourage voluntary commitments on transparency and best practices across the AI ecosystem.
    • Exploration of Technological Solutions: The committee should investigate the use of techno-legal measures, such as watermarking and content provenance, to address challenges like deepfakes and ensure accountability in AI systems.

  • What is Section 479 of the BNSS, 2023?

    Why in the News?

    The Central Government has directed all States and Union Territories (UTs) to implement Section 479 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS). This provision seeks to relieve undertrial prisoners (UTPs) by addressing prolonged detention and mitigating prison overcrowding.

    What is Section 479 of the BNSS?

    • Section 479 governs the maximum period for which an undertrial prisoner (UTP) can be detained during investigation, inquiry, or trial.
    • It is based on Section 436-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC).
    • It aims to address the prolonged detention of UTPs, ensure their timely release on bail or bond, and maintain fairness and accountability in the judicial process.
    • This section applies to cases where the punishment does not include death or life imprisonment, and introduces clear mechanisms for review and action, thereby mitigating issues like prison overcrowding.

    Key Provisions under Section 479 of BNSS:

    • Eligibility for Bail: Undertrials (UTPs) who have served half of their maximum possible sentence may be released on bail; the court must provide written reasons if they decide to extend detention after hearing the Public Prosecutor.
    • First-Time Offenders: UTPs with no prior convictions who have served one-third of their maximum sentence are eligible for release on bond, aligning with the principle of reformative justice.
    • Superintendent’s Responsibility: Jail superintendents must submit a written application to the court for the release of UTPs upon completion of the applicable detention period (one-third or one-half, depending on eligibility).
    • Exclusions: The provision does not apply to offences punishable by death or life imprisonment, and any delay caused by the accused is excluded from the detention period calculation.
    • Limitations for Multiple Offences: Accused individuals facing multiple offences or multiple charges are not covered, ensuring the provision is not misused in complex or repeated criminal cases.
    • Absolute Ceiling on Detention: Detention cannot exceed the maximum imprisonment term prescribed for the offence, preventing indefinite incarceration.
    • Judicial Oversight: Courts must ensure extended detention serves public safety and justice, requiring input from the Public Prosecutor for any continued confinement.
    • Mandatory Review Mechanism: A statutory review process is in place to prevent prolonged undertrial detention and address potential oversights or delays.
    • Safeguard against Misuse: Time delays caused by the accused do not count towards the detention period, ensuring fair application of the law.
    • Focus on Reform and Decongestion: By expediting bail and bond processes for eligible UTPs, the law aims to reduce overcrowding in prisons and uphold reformative objectives.

    PYQ:

    [2021] With reference to India, consider the following statements :​

    1. Judicial custody means an accused is in the custody of the concerned magistrate and such accused is locked up in police station, not in jail.​

    2. During judicial custody, the police officer in charge of the case is not allowed to interrogate the suspect without the approval of the court.​

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?​

    (a) 1 only ​

    (b) 2 only​

    (c) Both 1 and 2 ​

    (d) Neither 1 nor 2​

  • [8th January 2025] The Hindu Op-ed: The rebounding of Pakistan’s Afghan strategy

    PYQ Relevance:

    Q) The proposed withdrawal of International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) from Afghanistan in 2014 is fraught with major security implications for the countries of the region. Examine in light of the fact that India is faced with a plethora of challenges and needs to safeguard its own strategic interests. (UPSC CSE 2014)

    Mentor’s Comment: UPSC mains have always focused on Afghanistan (2014), and ‘Increasing cross-border terrorist attacks ’ (2016).

    On December 27, 2024, Pakistan’s Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) Director-General reported that 383 Pakistani security personnel were killed in counter-terrorism operations during the year. He stated that around 60,000 intelligence-based operations led to the elimination of 925 terrorists, including TTP members. While highlighting Pakistan’s support for Afghanistan, he firmly declared that TTP attacks on Pakistani citizens would not be tolerated, criticising Afghanistan for allegedly sheltering the group.

    Today’s editorial talk about the issues related to Afghanistan and Pakistan and how India can take benefits from it. This content can be used in Mains GSII paper to substantiate the regional issues which affect India.

    _

    Let’s learn!

    Why in the News?

    The Taliban’s return to power has turned Afghanistan into a serious problem for Pakistan’s security.

    What are the implications of Pakistan’s recent military actions in Afghanistan?

    • Casualties and Escalation: The Director-General of Pakistan’s ISPR reported that 383 Pakistani security personnel lost their lives in counter-terrorism operations in 2024, while 925 terrorists, including TTP members, were eliminated in about 60,000 operations. This indicates a significant escalation in military engagement, which may lead to further retaliatory actions from Afghanistan.
    • Retaliatory Strikes: Following an attack by the TTP that killed 16 Pakistani soldiers, Pakistan conducted air strikes in eastern Paktika province, reportedly killing 46 individuals. This tit-for-tat response has exacerbated tensions and risks deepening the conflict between the two nations.
    • Diplomatic Failure: The timing of military actions during diplomatic talks with Taliban leaders suggests a failure in Pakistan’s strategy to de-escalate tensions. This could undermine future diplomatic efforts and solidify hostilities between the two countries.

    How is Pakistan’s historical strategy of supporting certain factions in Afghanistan affecting its current diplomatic relations?

    • Support for Extremist Groups: Pakistan’s long-standing support for the Afghan Taliban and Haqqani network has backfired, as these groups now pose a threat to Pakistan’s own security through affiliations with the TTP. This creates a perception that both groups are intertwined, complicating diplomatic relations.
    • Strategic Depth vs. Strategic Ditch: Initially viewed as a means to gain strategic depth against India, the return of the Taliban has turned Afghanistan into a “strategic ditch” for Pakistan.
      • This shift reflects the unintended consequences of Pakistan’s historical policies and its inability to control former proxies.
    • Border Disputes: The Afghan Taliban’s rejection of the Durand Line as a legitimate border complicates relations further. Kabul’s claims over Pakistani territories exacerbate tensions and highlight the fragility of diplomatic ties rooted in historical grievances.
    How can India take benefit from this situation? 

    • Enhanced Regional Influence: India can leverage Pakistan-Afghanistan tensions to deepen its engagement with Afghanistan through developmental assistance and economic ties.
    • Counter-Terrorism Cooperation: Pakistan’s focus on its western border provides India an opportunity to strengthen its counter-terrorism initiatives along the LoC and its own western borders.
    • Strategic Regional Partnerships: India can position itself as a stabilizing force by fostering regional initiatives that exclude Pakistan, such as through expanded ties with Central Asia and Afghanistan.

    What are the potential pathways for reconciliation between Pakistan and Afghanistan amid escalating violence? (Way forward)

    • Dialogue and Diplomacy: Continued dialogue is essential, as evidenced by Muhammad Sadiq Khan’s visit to Kabul. However, for effective reconciliation, both sides must prioritize genuine engagement over military actions that undermine trust.
    • Addressing Core Issues: To move forward, both nations need to address underlying issues such as border disputes and mutual security concerns. Acknowledging and resolving these contentious points could pave the way for more stable relations.
    • International Mediation: Given the complexities involved, seeking mediation from international actors could help facilitate discussions and provide neutral ground for negotiations. This approach might alleviate some pressures from both sides while addressing broader security concerns.

    https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/incidents-on-loop-but-its-escape-for-regulator-airlines/article69040616.ece

  • More flexibility, but also greater challenges

    Why in the News?

    The latest guidelines from the University Grants Commission (UGC) mark a significant transformation in India’s higher education system.

    What are the Draft Guidelines by UGC in 2025?

    The University Grants Commission (UGC) has introduced new draft guidelines for undergraduate education in India, which include:

    • Accelerated Degree Programmes (ADP): This allows students to complete their degrees faster by earning additional credits per semester. Students can opt for this after their first or second semester based on their academic performance. A three-year degree can be completed in five semesters, while a four-year degree can be finished in six or seven semesters.
    • Extended Degree Programmes (EDP): This option enables students facing personal or academic challenges to extend their study duration, allowing them to take fewer credits per semester. There is no upper limit on the number of students who can enroll in EDP, unlike ADP, which may have a cap of 10% of the sanctioned intake.

    What are the advantages of adapting new guidelines?

    • Greater Flexibility: The new guidelines allow for biannual admissions, enabling students to enroll in higher education programs twice a year. This flexibility helps students who may have missed the initial admission cycle or face personal challenges, reducing the risk of losing an entire academic year.
    • Multiple Entry and Exit Options: Students can now enter and exit programs as needed, which accommodates various life circumstances and promotes lifelong learning. This approach aligns with the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020’s emphasis on inclusivity and adaptability.
    • Holistic Development: The guidelines promote multidisciplinary learning by allowing students to earn credits in skill development, apprenticeships, or other subjects outside their major discipline. This fosters a more well-rounded educational experience.
    • Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL): The introduction of RPL allows individuals to gain formal recognition for skills and knowledge acquired through informal or experiential learning. This enhances career prospects and supports the integration of informal workers into the education system.
    • Alignment with Global Standards: By adopting these flexible structures, Indian higher education can better align with international practices, improving student mobility both within India and abroad.

    What are the challenges in adapting new guidelines?

    • Administrative Complexity: Implementing these new guidelines requires significant changes to existing administrative structures and processes within higher education institutions (HEIs). This can be daunting for institutions already facing resource constraints.
    • Quality Assurance Concerns: There are concerns about maintaining educational quality and rigor, especially in accelerated programs where the curriculum is compressed. This could lead to superficial understanding of key concepts among students.
    • Equity Issues: Students from underprivileged backgrounds may struggle to navigate the new system without adequate support, potentially leading to higher dropout rates if they cannot keep pace with peers.
    • Faculty Adaptation: Educators will need professional development to adjust to new pedagogical models that emphasize flexibility and interdisciplinary learning. The success of these reforms depends not only on student adaptation but also on faculty capability to support diverse learning needs effectively.

    What are the practical issues? 

    • Curriculum Restructuring: Implementing these new formats requires significant changes to existing curricula and teaching methodologies, which could strain resources at many institutions.
    • Administrative Frameworks: Institutions must develop robust systems for tracking student progress, managing credit transfers, and recognizing academic achievements effectively.
    • Digital Divide: The shift towards digitalization in education could exacerbate inequalities among students from different socio-economic backgrounds if adequate support systems are not established.
    • Faculty Development: Educators will need professional development to adapt to new teaching models that emphasize flexibility and interdisciplinary learning.

    Way forward: 

    • Strengthen Institutional Capacity: Provide financial support, upgrade infrastructure, and streamline administrative systems to manage credit transfers, biannual admissions, and curriculum restructuring effectively.
    • Ensure Inclusivity and Quality: Offer targeted support for underprivileged students, bridge the digital divide, and invest in faculty development programs to maintain educational quality and equity.

    Mains PYQ:

    Q National Education Policy 2020 is in conformity with the Sustainable Development Goal-4 (2030). It intends to restructure and reorient education system in India. Critically examine the statement. (UPSC IAS/2020)