💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

GS Paper: GS2

  • Defamation in the Digital Age: The Case of Arvind Kejriwal

    In the news

    Try this question from CS Mains 2014:

    What do understand by the concept of “freedom of speech and expression”? Does it cover hate speech also? Why do films in India stand on a slightly different plane from other forms of expression? Discuss.

    What is the Right to Free Speech?

    • Freedom: Article 19(1) (a) guarantees the freedom of speech and expression to all citizens. It is the first condition of liberty and plays an important role in forming public opinion.
    • Restrictions: As per Article 19(2), restrictions can be imposed upon the freedom of speech and expression in the interests of:
    1. Sovereignty and integrity of India,
    2. Security of the state,
    3. Friendly relations with foreign states,
    4. Public order, decency or morality, or
    5. In relation to contempt of court,
    6. Defamation, or
    7. Incitement to an offense
    • Online Discourse: The proliferation of social media platforms necessitates a nuanced understanding of free speech rights in the digital realm, balancing individual liberties with societal interests.
    • Immunity for Politicians: For politicians, while they enjoy the right to free speech, they are also subject to certain limitations. Criticism of the government or its policies is generally allowed as long as it does not incite violence or hatred.

    Legal Conundrum over Digital Defamation

    • Background: Kejriwal faced defamation charges for retweeting a video by a YouTuber Dhruv Rathee, alleging defamatory statements against the BJP’s IT cell.
    • Legal Proceedings: The Delhi High Court upheld the summons issued to Kejriwal, citing the widespread impact of retweets by public figures.
    • Constitutional Considerations: The right to free speech, protected under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution, is subject to reasonable restrictions, including defamation laws under Article 19(2).
    • Retweeting vs. Endorsement: The court’s intervention underscores the distinction between retweeting and endorsing content. While retweeting may not always signify endorsement, public figures are held to a higher standard of responsibility for their online actions.
    • Defamation Laws: Indian law, as delineated in Section 499 of the Indian Penal Code, criminalizes statements intended to harm an individual’s reputation. However, applying these laws to online communication poses unique challenges.

    Legal Precedents and Interpretations

    • Shreya Singhal vs. Union of India (2015): Section 66A of The IT Act, 2000, had criminalised sending “offensive messages” utilizing “a computer resource or a communication device”. This provision was quashed by the SC given the ambiguity in the definition of the term “offensive”.
    • Subramanian Swamy vs. Union of India (2016): The Supreme Court affirmed the constitutionality of criminal defamation laws, balancing the right to reputation with freedom of expression.
    • Kaushal Kishore vs. Union of India (2017): The Court clarified that additional restrictions on free speech must align with Article 19(2) and cannot be arbitrarily imposed.

    Implications for Online Discourse

    • Scope of Defamation: Online retweets amplify the dissemination of allegedly defamatory content, raising questions about liability and accountability.
    • Responsibility of Public Figures: Public figures like Kejriwal face heightened scrutiny for their online activities, given their influence and reach on social media platforms.

    Conclusion

    • This defamation case underscores the evolving dynamics of communication in the digital age.
    • As online discourse continues to shape public opinion, striking a balance between freedom of expression and legal safeguards against defamation remains a pressing challenge.
    • The Supreme Court’s intervention provides an opportunity to reassess existing laws and norms governing online speech, ensuring that rights and responsibilities are harmonized in the digital realm.

  • Appointment of Lokpal chairperson

    Why in the News?
    Recently, the former SC judge A.M. Khanwilkar has been appointed as Lokpal chairperson.

    More details on the news:

    • The Lokpal has been working without its regular Chief after Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghose completed his term on May 27, 2022. Justice Pradip Kumar Mohanty, a judicial member of the Lokpal, is currently the acting chairperson.
    • Former High Court judges Lingappa Narayana Swamy, Sanjay Yadav and Ritu Raj Awasthi have been appointed as judicial members of the Lokpal.

    About Lokpal:

    • The Lokpal is established up under the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act 2013 to investigate corruption allegations against public functionaries.
    • Former Supreme Court Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghose assumed office as the first Lokpal chairperson in March 2019.
    • India is a signatory to the United Nations Convention against Corruption. The establishment of Lokpal reflects the government’s commitment to clean and responsive governance by combating corruption.

    Composition of Lokpal:

    • The Lokpal consists of a chairperson and eight members – four judicial and four non-judicial.
    • Appointed by the President of India for a 5-year term or until they reach 70 years of age, whichever comes first.
    • Appointment Process: The President appoints the Chairperson and Members based on recommendations from a Selection Committee comprising the Prime Minister, Speaker of the House of the People, Leader of Opposition in the House of the People, Chief Justice of India or a nominated Supreme Court Judge, and an eminent jurist nominated by the President.

     Lokpal’s Jurisdiction:

    • The Lokpal investigates corruption allegations against current or former Prime Ministers, Union Ministers, Members of Parliament, and officials in Groups A, B, C, and D of the Union Government.
    • It extends to chairpersons, members, officers, and directors of entities established by an Act of Parliament or funded by the Union or State government.
    • The jurisdiction includes societies, trusts, or bodies receiving foreign contributions exceeding ₹10 lakh (approximately US$14,300 as of 2019)

  • Rare Diseases Care in India: Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities

    In the news

    What are Rare Diseases?

    • Global Perspective: Rare diseases are defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as often debilitating lifelong diseases or disorders with a prevalence of 1 or less, per 1,000 population.
    • National Context: While India lacks a standardized definition, the Organisation of Rare Diseases – India suggests defining a disease as rare if it affects 1 in 5,000 people or less.

    Rare Diseases: Key Facts and Figures

    • India issued its first National Policy on Rare Diseases in March 2021, offering comprehensive strategies for prevention and management.
    • Less than 5% of rare diseases have therapies available in India, yet they affect nearly 1/5th of the population.
    • The Union Government allocated ₹50 lakh per patient for rare diseases treatment, but only approximately 49% of the allocated funds have been utilized.
    • There are approximately 7,000-8,000 rare diseases in India, with new diseases continually being identified and reported.

     

    National Policy on Rare Diseases, 2021: Highlights

    • Comprehensive Approach: This Policy offers a holistic framework encompassing prevention, management, and treatment strategies tailored to the unique needs of patients.
    • Financial Support: Recognizing the financial burden on patients, the policy aims to lower the exorbitant costs of treatment through targeted interventions and support mechanisms.
    • Research Focus: Emphasizing indigenous research, the policy lays the foundation for bolstering research initiatives in the field of rare diseases, fostering innovation and discovery.

    Other Initiatives in India

    • National Hospital-Based Registry: A pivotal component of the policy, the establishment of a national registry of rare diseases promises to provide invaluable epidemiological data, informing targeted interventions and resource allocation.
    • Early Screening and Prevention: The creation of Nidan Kendras aims to enhance early detection and prevention efforts, crucial for improving patient outcomes and reducing disease burden.
    • Capacity Building: Strengthening secondary and tertiary health facilities at Centres of Excellence underscores the commitment to enhancing healthcare infrastructure and service delivery.

    Challenges and Imperatives

    • Defining Rare Diseases: Despite significant progress, India lacks a standardized definition of rare diseases, necessitating clarity to guide policy and resource allocation effectively.
    • Funding Utilization: Concerns arise over the underutilization of allocated funds, highlighting the urgency to streamline resource allocation and enhance accountability mechanisms.
    • Patient Advocacy: Rare diseases patient advocacy groups play a pivotal role in advocating for timely access to treatment and sustainable funding support, urging policymakers and healthcare providers to prioritize patient-centric initiatives.

    Way Forward

    • Sustainable Funding: Ensuring sustainable funding support for rare diseases treatment is paramount to safeguarding patient well-being and fostering equitable access to care.
    • National Registry Implementation: Accelerating the establishment of a hospital-based national registry is imperative to harness the power of data-driven decision-making and advance rare diseases research.
    • Multidisciplinary Care: The creation of comprehensive care centers, coupled with initiatives to support caregivers, represents a crucial step towards enhancing patient outcomes and fostering a supportive healthcare ecosystem.

    Conclusion

    • As India commemorates World Rare Diseases Day, it stands at a pivotal juncture in its journey towards rare diseases care and advocacy.
    • By embracing a collaborative and patient-centric approach, India can surmount existing challenges, paving the way for a future where every individual affected by a rare disease receives the care and support they deserve.

    Try this PYQ from CSP 2014:

    Consider the following diseases

    1. Diphtheria
    2. Chickenpox
    3. Smallpox

    Which of the above diseases has/have been eradicated in India?

    (a) 1 and 2 only

    (b) 3 only

    (c) 1, 2 and 3

    (d) None

     

    [wpdiscuz-feedback id=”p3avfkfd93″ question=”Please leave a feedback on this” opened=”1″]Post your responses here.[/wpdiscuz-feedback]

  • Cross-Voting in Rajya Sabha Elections

    cross voting rajya sabha

    In the news

    • Recent Rajya Sabha elections in Uttar Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh, and Karnataka have been marred by instances of cross-voting, prompting concerns over the integrity of the electoral process.

    Why discuss this?

    • Understanding the legal framework governing Rajya Sabha elections and the implications of cross-voting is crucial in addressing these concerns and upholding democratic principles.

    Rajya Sabha Elections and Cross-Voting

    • Constitutional Provision: Article 80 of the Constitution mandates the indirect election of Rajya Sabha representatives by the elected members of State Legislative Assemblies.
    • Historical Context: Rajya Sabha elections were traditionally uncontested until 1998, when cross-voting in Maharashtra marked a departure from this trend.

    Explained: Rajya Sabha Election Process

    Legal Provisions and Precedents

    • Open Ballot System: An amendment to the Representation of the People Act, 1951 in 2003 introduced open ballot voting for Rajya Sabha elections, aimed at curbing cross-voting.
    • Tenth Schedule (Anti-Defection Law): Introduced in 1985, this Schedule disqualifies legislators who voluntarily give up party membership or vote against party instructions. However, it does not apply to Rajya Sabha elections.
    • Court Rulings: The Supreme Court, in cases such as Kuldip Nayar versus Union of India (2006), upheld the open ballot system while clarifying that voting against party candidates in Rajya Sabha elections does not invoke disqualification under the Tenth Schedule.

    Current Challenges and Legal Remedies

    • Cross-Voting Impact: Instances of cross-voting undermine the democratic process and erode electoral integrity.
    • Judicial Intervention: The Supreme Court may initiate suo moto proceedings or review existing judgments to address the issue of cross-voting.
    • Disqualification Criteria: Voting against party lines in Rajya Sabha elections may be considered voluntary defection, warranting disqualification under the Tenth Schedule.

    Way Forward

    • Upholding the Intent: Instances of cross-voting undermine the transparency aimed at by the open ballot system, raising questions about the effectiveness of existing mechanisms.
    • Judicial Intervention: The Supreme Court’s commitment to safeguarding democracy provides hope for addressing cross-voting issues through suo moto Public Interest Litigation or appeals against disqualification rulings.
    • Revisiting Precedents: There is scope for the court to reinterpret its previous rulings in light of evolving circumstances, potentially aligning the consequences of cross-voting with the principles of the Tenth Schedule.
    • Deterrent Measures: Clarifying that cross-voting may constitute grounds for disqualification under the Tenth Schedule could serve as a deterrent against future instances.

    Conclusion

    • Upholding the principles of free and fair elections requires addressing the challenge of cross-voting in Rajya Sabha elections.
    • Judicial intervention and enforcement of existing laws are essential to safeguarding the integrity of the electoral process and preserving democratic norms.

    Try this PYQ from CSP 2020:

    Rajya Sabha has equal powers with Lok Sabha in

    (a) the matter of creating new All India Services

    (b) amending the Constitution

    (c) the removal of the government

    (d) making cut motions

     

    [wpdiscuz-feedback id=”tescdtxw4r” question=”Please leave a feedback on this” opened=”1″]Post your responses here.[/wpdiscuz-feedback]

  • PM inaugurates Naval Base and Airstrip in Agalega Island, Mauritius

    Agalega Island

    In the news

    • PM Modi in collaboration with his Mauritian counterpart Pravind Jugnauth, inaugurated a series of projects on Mauritius’ Agalega Island.

    Agalega Island: A Strategic Location

    • Agaléga are two outer islands of Mauritius located in the Indian Ocean, about 1,000 kilometers north of Mauritius island.
    • The islands have a total area of 2,600 ha (6,400 acres).
    • Notable settlements include Vingt Cinq on the North Island and Sainte Rita on the South Island, serving as primary hubs for residents and economic activities.

    Significance of New Airstrip and the Base

    • India’s Strategic Presence: The inauguration of a new airstrip and jetty underscores India’s commitment to strengthening its influence in the southwestern Indian Ocean, aligning with its broader strategic objectives.
    • Economic Impetus: Agalega Island’s strategic location facilitates trade and connectivity in the Indian Ocean region, enhancing economic opportunities for Mauritius and neighboring countries.
    • Trade Security: With a significant portion of India’s trade traversing the Indian Ocean, the development of infrastructure on Agalega Island contributes to safeguarding trade routes and ensuring maritime security.

    Benefits for Mauritius

    • Developmental support: Historically a slave plantation, North Agalega Island reflects the legacy of colonial exploitation, with its main town, Vingt Cinq, evoking the brutality of slavery.
    • Strategic boost: India’s development initiatives aim to ameliorate conditions for the island’s inhabitants, alongside bolstering Mauritian Defence Force operations.

    India’s Strategic Imperative

    • Counterbalancing Chinese Influence: India’s developmental endeavors on Agalega Island serve as a proactive measure to counter China’s expanding ‘String of Pearls’ strategy, safeguarding its regional interests and sovereignty.
    • Enhanced Security Infrastructure: By upgrading security infrastructure, including facilities for surveillance and monitoring, Mauritius strengthens its security apparatus, contributing to overall regional stability and resilience.
    • Regional Cooperation: The projects on Agalega Island are aligned with India’s Security and Growth for All in the Region (SAGAR) policy initiative, aimed at fostering regional development and security cooperation among Indian Ocean Rim countries.

  • Understanding the world of the informal waste picker

     

    High time to address occupational hazards of waste pickers

    Why is it in news?  

    • On March 1, International Waste Pickers Day, waste pickers across the world will pay homage to fellow pickers who were murdered in Colombia in 1992.

    Who are informal waste pickers?

    • The International Labour Organization defines the informal sector in waste management as ‘individuals or small and micro-enterprises that intervene in waste management without being registered and without being formally charged with providing waste management services’

    Background:

    • Informal waste pickers, often overlooked and marginalized, play a crucial but unseen role in India’s waste management systems. They are vital yet often forgotten members of the waste value chain ecosystem, deserving recognition and understanding.
    • These workers are the primary collectors of recyclable waste, playing a critical role in waste management and resource efficiency by collecting, sorting, trading and sometimes even reinserting discarded waste back into the economy.
    • Yet, they face systemic marginalisation due to non-recognition, non-representation, and exclusion from social security schemes and legal protection frameworks.

    What data shows?

    • While reliable estimates of informal waste pickers are difficult to come by, the Centre for Science and Environment reported that the informal waste economy employs about 5%–2% of the urban population globally.
    • Many are women, children and the elderly, who are often disabled, are the poorest of the urban poor, and face violence and sexual harassment often. The Periodic Labour Force Survey 2017-18 indicates that there are nearly 1.5 million waste pickers within India’s urban workforce, with half a million being women.

    Challenges Faced by Waste Pickers

    • Work Conditions: Waste pickers labor for 8 to 10 hours daily, collecting 60 kg to 90 kg of waste, often without safety equipment, exposing themselves to hazards.
    • Health Issues: They suffer from dermatological and respiratory problems, alongside regular injuries, due to their hazardous work conditions.
    • Socioeconomic Factors: Low income, irregular work, and harassment exacerbate their precarious livelihoods, compounded by their subordinate position in the caste hierarchy.

    Impact of Private Sector Participation in waste collection

    • Exclusion: Private sector involvement in waste management alienates waste pickers, depriving them of their rights and exacerbating their vulnerability.
    • Marginalization: As noted by the Alliance of Indian Waste Pickers (AIW) 2023 report, Private actors employ expensive machinery, marginalizing informal waste pickers by offering competitive rates to waste generators, forcing them into hazardous scavenging activities.
    • Loss of Rights: Private players and municipal authorities often cordon off dump sites, further limiting waste pickers’ access and exacerbating their vulnerability.

    Importance of Waste Pickers in Plastic Management

    • Global Contribution: Waste pickers globally collect and recover up to 60% of all plastic waste, contributing significantly to its recycling efforts, as highlighted in the 2022 World Economic Forum report.
    • Underappreciated Role: Despite their crucial contribution to sustainable recycling, waste pickers’ work is undervalued, and they struggle to earn a decent livelihood.
    • Quantitative Impact: Reports by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and Pew state that informal waste pickers collected 27 million metric tonnes of plastic waste in 2016 alone, representing 59% of all plastic material collected for recycling, thereby preventing it from ending up in landfills or oceans.
    • Relevance in India’s Context: In India, where per capita plastic waste generation is rising, waste pickers’ role becomes even more critical, especially considering that the country is among the top 12 responsible for 52% of the world’s mismanaged waste, as per a recent CPCB report.
    • Harnessing Traditional Knowledge: Waste pickers possess traditional knowledge about waste handling, which could significantly enhance the effectiveness of the EPR system if integrated properly.
    • Rethinking EPR Norms: In light of this, there is a need to reconsider the formulation of EPR norms to ensure the inclusion and empowerment of millions of informal waste pickers within the new legal framework.

    Understanding Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)

    • Objective: EPR aims to enhance plastic waste management by transferring the responsibility of waste management from municipal authorities to commercial waste producers.
    • Promises of EPR: EPR holds the potential for social inclusion for waste pickers and other informal grassroots actors by promoting accountability among commercial waste producers.

    Analysis of Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Guidelines

    • Stakeholder Identification: The EPR guidelines in India recognize various stakeholders, including the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), producers, brand owners, industry, industry associations, civil society organizations, and citizens.
    • Uncertainty Regarding Inclusion: It remains unclear whether these stakeholders include informal waste pickers or their representing organizations, raising questions about the extent of their involvement in the EPR framework.
    • Discrepancies with Solid Waste Management Rules 2016: While the Solid Waste Management Rules 2016 mandate the inclusion of waste pickers in municipal solid waste management systems, informal waste pickers are evidently missing in the prioritization within the EPR guidelines.
    • Omission in EPR Guidelines 2022: The EPR Guidelines 2022, published by the Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate Change, have blatantly ignored the role of informal waste pickers in waste management and recycling, further exacerbating their exclusion from the formal waste management framework.

    Challenges in Implementation

    • Redirection of Waste: Despite its promises, EPR often redirects waste away from the informal sector, posing a threat of large-scale displacement for informal waste pickers.
    • Concerns Raised by WIEGO: Women in Informal Employment: Globalizing and Organizing (WIEGO) have noted the potential negative impacts of EPR on informal waste pickers, highlighting the need for careful consideration and mitigation of such effects.

    In conclusion, acknowledging waste pickers’ crucial role in plastic recycling is imperative for sustainable waste management. Efforts should focus on integrating them into formal systems like the Extended Producer Responsibility mechanism while addressing their socio-economic vulnerabilities for a more equitable and environmentally sound future.

     

  • Ex-SC Judge Justice A M Khanwilkar appointed Lokpal Chairperson

    In the news

    • Former Supreme Court judge Justice Ajay Manikrao Khanwilkar has been appointed as the chairperson of Lokpal, the anti-corruption ombudsman of India.
    • Justice Khanwilkar retired from the Supreme Court in July 2022, bringing a wealth of judicial experience to his new role.

    About Lokpal

    • Establishment: Lokpal is a statutory body established under the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act of 2013.
    • Mandate: It is tasked with investigating allegations of corruption against certain public functionaries and related matters.
    • Organisational Structure:
    1. The Lokpal comprises a chairperson and a maximum of 8 members.
    2. The chairperson must be a former Chief Justice of India, a former Supreme Court judge, or an eminent person meeting eligibility criteria.
    3. Half of the members must be judicial members, either former Supreme Court judges or former Chief Justices of High Courts.
    4. At least 50% members must be from SC / ST / OBC / Minorities and women.
    5. Members serve a term of 5 years or until they turn 70, whichever is earlier.
    • Perks and Benefits: The salary, allowances, and other conditions of service for the chairperson are equivalent to those of the CJI, while members receive benefits similar to Supreme Court judges.

    Appointment Process:

    • The President of India appoints the chairperson and members based on the recommendation of a selection committee.
    • The selection committee includes the PM as Chairperson, the Speaker of Lok Sabha, the Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha, the Chief Justice of India or a nominated judge, and one eminent jurist.

    Jurisdiction:

    • Lokpal has jurisdiction to investigate allegations of corruption against Prime Ministers, Union Ministers, Members of Parliament, and officials of the Union Government.
    • It extends to individuals associated with government-funded entities and those receiving substantial foreign contributions.

    Exceptions for Prime Minister:

    • Lokpal cannot probe allegations against the PM related to certain sensitive areas like international relations, security, public order, atomic energy, and space without the approval of at least 2/3rds of its members.
    • A full Lokpal bench must consider initiating inquiries into complaints against the PM.

    Powers of Lokpal:

    • Lokpal exercises superintendence over and provides directions to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in corruption cases.
    • It can authorize the CBI for search and seizure operations linked to such cases.
    • The Lokpal’s Inquiry Wing possesses powers akin to a civil court.
    • It can recommend the transfer or suspension of public servants implicated in corruption allegations.
    • Lokpal is empowered to prevent the destruction of records during preliminary inquiries and confiscate assets obtained through corruption.

    Reporting and Accountability

    • Annually, Lokpal submits a report on its activities to the President, which is then presented to both Houses of Parliament for scrutiny.

    Try this PYQ from CS Mains 2013

    Q.‘A national Lokpal, however strong it may be, cannot resolve the problems of immorality in public affairs’. Discuss.

  • On Irregularities in Vertical Devolution

    On Irregularities in Vertical Devolution

    Introduction

    • Recent agitations and concerns raised by state governments highlight critical issues in the practice of fiscal federalism in India.
    • Kerala and Karnataka governments, supported by others, have underscored the urgency for the 16th Finance Commission (FC) to address vertical and horizontal inequalities in devolution

    Also read:

    Explained: Financial Devolution among States

    Trends in Vertical Devolution

    • Shrinking Divisible Pool: Historically, the divisible pool consisted mainly of income taxes and excise duties shared with states. However, recent changes have seen the exclusion of certain taxes, like corporation taxes, from the divisible pool, reducing the share available for states.
    • Expansion of Cesses and Surcharges: Despite the GST implementation, new cesses and surcharges continue to be introduced, contributing to the exclusion of an increasing share of gross tax revenue from net proceeds, impacting vertical devolution.
    • Conflicting Data: Discrepancies in government-released information on the quantum of cesses and surcharges have raised concerns about transparency and accurate reporting, which are vital for assessing the true extent of vertical devolution challenges.

    Financial Implications

    • Collection Trends: Disaggregated data analysis reveals a significant rise in the collection of cesses and surcharges over the past decade, with amounts not shared with states but retained solely by the Union government, exacerbating the vertical devolution imbalance.
    • Cumulative Collection: Cumulatively, substantial amounts have been collected as cesses and surcharges, depriving states of their rightful share and necessitating corrective measures to address historical wrongs in vertical devolution.

    Challenges in Tied Transfers

    [A] Nature of Transfers:

    • Central Schemes: The requirement for state contributions to centrally sponsored schemes and central sector schemes places a financial burden on states, undermining their fiscal autonomy and perpetuating a patron-client relationship with the Union government.
    • Conditionalities: Grants provided to states often come with conditionalities, such as labelling requirements, further limiting states’ flexibility in utilizing funds according to their specific needs.
    • Loan Nature: Most capital transfers to states are in the form of loans, adding to states’ debt burdens and constraining their financial freedom.

    [B] Impact on Federal Dynamics:

    • Centralizing Tendency: Imposed conditionalities and the reliance on centrally sponsored schemes reinforce a centralizing tendency, eroding the principles of cooperative fiscal federalism and undermining states’ autonomy in fiscal matters.
    • Substitution of Untied Transfers: The substitution of untied transfers with centrally sponsored schemes introduces rigidity in Union-State relations, hindering effective collaboration and diluting the spirit of cooperative federalism envisioned in the Indian federal structure.

    Scrutiny by Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG)

    • Non-Transfer of Funds: Instances of non-transfer or short transfer of collected amounts, as highlighted by the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG), raise concerns about the effective utilization of funds and the transparency of financial management practices.
    • Consequences:
      1. Defeat of Collection Logic: The failure to transfer cesses and surcharges to the designated reserve funds undermines the intended purpose of their collection, leading to inefficiencies and potential misappropriation of funds.
      2. Ruse for Fund Diversion: The discrepancies in fund transfers raise suspicions regarding the true intent behind cesses and surcharges, with indications that they may serve as a means to divert funds away from the divisible pool for other government expenditures.

    Deviations from Finance Commission (FC) Recommendations

    [A] Assessment of Union Government’s Claims:

    • Retention of Gross Tax Revenue: While the retention of a portion of gross tax revenue by the Union government has a basis in constitutional provisions, the failure to adhere to FC recommendations on sharing net proceeds raises questions about the government’s commitment to equitable fiscal federalism.
    • Failure in Net Proceeds Sharing: Analysis of the share of central taxes devolved to states against FC-stipulated percentages reveals consistent underperformance by the Union government, indicating a significant deviation from FC recommendations.

    [B] Quantitative Analysis:

    • Shortfalls: Comparisons of actual devolutions with FC-recommended shares highlight substantial shortfalls, amounting to significant cumulative amounts over the years, representing a systemic failure in achieving equitable distribution of resources among states.
    • Cumulative Impact: The cumulative amounts not devolved to states underscore the magnitude of the fiscal imbalance and the urgent need for corrective measures to rectify historical injustices in vertical devolution.

    Way Forward: Reform Agenda for the 16th Finance Commission

    [A] Corrective Measures

    • Compensations to States: Addressing historical wrongs in vertical devolution requires compensatory measures to ensure fair resource distribution among states and rectify past imbalances.
    • Accurate Reporting: Mandating accurate reporting of “net proceeds” in budget documents is essential for transparency and accountability in fiscal management, enabling stakeholders to assess the true extent of resource allocation.
    • Addressing Shortfalls: Providing lump sum untied grants to states to offset past shortfalls in devolution is crucial to restoring states’ fiscal autonomy and promoting cooperative federalism.

    [B] Legislative Action:

    • Limiting Cesses and Surcharges: Enacting legislation to impose strict limits on the collection of cesses and surcharges, with provisions for automatic expiry and prevention of rechristening, is necessary to prevent misuse and ensure transparency in revenue generation.

    Conclusion

    • The stance of the 16th Finance Commission on vertical devolution is pivotal for the survival of fiscal federalism in India, requiring decisive action to address existing challenges and uphold the principles of cooperative federalism.

  • Row over Karnataka Temple Bill

    temple

    In the news

    • The Karnataka government’s recent move to amend the law governing the taxation of Hindu temples sparked significant debate and controversy.
    • It aims to overhaul the existing framework, particularly in terms of income allocation and management.

    Proposed Changes in Temple Taxation

    The Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments (Amendment) Bill, 2024 aimed to modify several provisions in the existing law:

    • Income Allocation: The proposed change sought to divert 10% of the gross income of temples earning over Rs 1 crore annually to a common pool for temple maintenance. Section 19 of the Act outlines the purposes for which the common fund may be utilized, including religious studies, temple maintenance, and charitable causes.
    • Shift in Calculation: This change would shift from the previous norm of allocating 10% of the net income of temples with earnings over Rs 10 lakh annually.
    • Dedicated Common Pool: Additionally, 5% of the income of temples earning between Rs 10 lakh and Rs 1 crore annually would have been dedicated to the common pool.
    • Priests Welfare: The Congress government proposed utilizing the enhanced funds to support lower-income temples, provide assistance to ailing priests, and offer scholarships to priests’ families.

    Additional Amendments Proposed:

    • Committee of Management: The Bill proposed including a member skilled in Vishwakarma Hindu temple architecture and sculpture within the committee of management for temples.
    • Authority of Rajya Dharmika Parishat: It granted the Rajya Dharmika Parishat the power to appoint the chairman of temple management committees.
    • Infrastructure Oversight: The Bill mandated the creation of district-level and state high-level committees to oversee infrastructural projects facilitating temple pilgrimage.

    Criticism and Opposition

    • Interference into Religious Matters: BJP leaders accused the government of attempting to “rob” Hindu temples and questioned the selective targeting of Hindu institutions.
    • Questioning Motives: Concerns were raised regarding the selective taxation of Hindu temples, prompting questions about the government’s intentions.

    Constitutional Insights into the Issue

     

    The proposed Bill, which aimed to divert a percentage of temple income to a common pool, raised concerns about government interference in temple finances, potentially infringing on these constitutional rights under:

    • Article 25: Ensures individuals’ freedom to profess, practice, and propagate religion, subject to public order, morality, and health.
    • Article 26: Grants religious denominations autonomy to manage their religious affairs and establish institutions for religious and charitable purposes.

    Comparison with Other States

    • Telangana’s Model: Similar to Karnataka, Telangana also mandates temple contributions towards a common good fund, utilized for temple maintenance and related expenses.
    • Kerala’s Devaswom Boards: Kerala’s temples are managed by state-run Devaswom Boards, each with its own budget and administrative laws, overseen by government-appointed nominees.

    Issues with the Bill

    • Government Interference: The appointment of members from Hindu and other religions to temple management committees raises concerns about state involvement in temple affairs.
    • Contradiction to Secularism: Perceived as contradicting the principle of secularism advocating for a separation of religion and state involvement in religious matters.
    • Conflict with Autonomy: Opposition to the diversion of temple income for a common pool fund highlights concerns about encroachment on religious autonomy and financial mismanagement by the state.

    Conclusion

    • The Karnataka temple bill controversy underscores the complex interplay between governance, religion, and finance.
    • While intended reforms aimed to enhance temple infrastructure and support, differing interpretations and political alignments led to its rejection.
    • As states grapple with temple management, a balance between tradition, governance, and public welfare remains a constant challenge.

    Try this Question from CS Mains 2018:

    Q.How the Indian concept of secularism different from the western model of secularism? Discuss. (10)

     

    [wpdiscuz-feedback id=”ba3uieqcag” question=”Please leave a feedback on this” opened=”1″]Post your responses here.[/wpdiscuz-feedback]

  • Article 371A’s Influence on Coal Mining Rules in Nagaland

    In the news

    • The Nagaland CM is facing pressure to regulate coal mining after a tragic incident where six miners died in an explosion.
    • The unique land rights granted under Article 371A of the Indian Constitution have complicated efforts to control illegal coal mining activities.

    Article 371A: Special Provisions for Nagaland

    Details
    Historical Context Established in 1963 for Nagaland, recognizing its autonomy after the Naga people’s struggle.
    Religious & Social Practices Protects Naga tribes’ customs, traditions, and religious practices from external interference.
    Customary Laws Allows continuation of indigenous legal systems and traditional methods of justice.
    **Autonomy Grants Nagaland autonomy in managing its land, forests, and natural resources.
    Legislation Reserves seats in the Nagaland Legislative Assembly for various tribes and communities.
    Special Rights Aims to protect Naga people’s rights and promote socio-cultural development within the state.

    Article 371A

    Why discuss this?

    • Rat-hole Mining: Nagaland’s coal mining policy, permitting rat-hole mining due to the scattered nature of coal deposits, presents challenges for effective regulation.
    • Licensing Restrictions: Small pocket deposit licenses, awarded to individual landowners, impose limitations on lease duration, mining area, and machinery usage, as outlined in the Nagaland Coal Policy (First Amendment) of 2014.

    Conclusion

    • The intersection of constitutional provisions, traditional land rights, and regulatory frameworks poses complex challenges for the Nagaland government in its endeavour to address illegal coal mining activities.
    • As legislative deliberations continue, concerted efforts towards public awareness, regulatory reforms, and enforcement actions remain imperative for safeguarding both natural resources and community welfare in the state.