💥Mains Ready By December. Smash Mains & Smash PYQ Admissions Open
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

GS Paper: GS2

  • Equity concerns in the 16th Finance Commission award

    Why in the News

    The 16th Finance Commission has retained the size of the tax pool for States but reshaped the grants that equalise between them. The tension is between fiscal efficiency and the constitutional intent of equity across unequal States.

    What is the Finance Commission?

    1. Constitutional body: The Finance Commission is set up under Article 280 every five years to recommend the sharing of taxes between the Union and the States.
    2. Vertical devolution: It fixes the share of central taxes that goes to States as a whole.
    3. Horizontal devolution: It sets the formula distributing that share among individual States.

    What are the Key Recommendations of the 16th Finance Commission?

    • Vertical devolution retained at 41%: The States’ share of the divisible pool stays at 41%, the same level as the 15th Finance Commission, giving continuity and predictability.
    • Income distance weight trimmed: The income distance weight in the horizontal formula is cut from 45% to 42.5%.
    • New GDP contribution weight: A 10% GDP contribution weight is introduced in the horizontal formula.
    • Revenue Deficit Grants eliminated: The Revenue Deficit Grants that plugged the gap for States unable to meet committed expenditure are discontinued.
    • Sector and State specific grants cut: Most sector specific and State specific grants are removed.
    • Grants in aid share halved: Grants in aid fall from 19.4% to 8.3% of total transfers.

    Why do the changes raise equity concerns?

    • Rewarding the prosperous: A GDP contribution weight favours already prosperous States that contribute more to national output.
    • Removing the equaliser: Revenue Deficit Grants had cushioned States that cannot meet committed expenditure from their own revenue.
    • Constitutional intent: Grants in aid under Article 275 are meant to lift weaker States, and a shrinking grant share works against that purpose.

    Conclusion

    The award tilts the transfer system toward fiscal performance and away from equalisation. The unresolved question is whether poorer States can meet their obligations once the grant cushion is withdrawn.

    What is Fiscal Federalism?

    • About: Fiscal federalism is the division of taxation powers, expenditure responsibilities, borrowing powers, and intergovernmental transfers among the different levels of government in a federal system.
    • Rationale: It is not merely a mechanism for dividing taxes, it ensures that a citizen’s access to essential public services does not depend excessively on the fiscal capacity of the State in which they live. Indian fiscal federalism reconciles three imbalances.
    • Vertical fiscal imbalance: The Union has access to buoyant, broad based taxes, while the States carry expenditure intensive responsibilities such as health, education, agriculture, police, and local infrastructure.
    • Horizontal fiscal imbalance: States differ widely in income, resources, geography, demographics, and revenue raising ability, so a lower income State cannot fund the same services as a richer one at similar tax rates.
    • Third tier fiscal imbalance: Panchayats and Municipalities carry substantial service delivery duties but have limited own source revenue and depend on transfers from the Union and the States.

    Constitutional Framework Governing Fiscal Federalism

    • Article 246 and the Seventh Schedule: Divides legislative and taxation powers through the Union, State, and Concurrent Lists, placing public order, health, agriculture, and local government largely in the State domain.
    • Article 246A: Inserted by the 101st Constitutional Amendment Act, 2016, gives Parliament and State Legislatures concurrent power over Goods and Services Tax, with Parliament exclusive over inter State GST.
    • Article 270: Defines the taxes forming the divisible pool shared with the States on the Finance Commission’s recommendation.
    • Article 271: Allows Union surcharges, which along with cesses are excluded from the divisible pool.
    • Article 275: Empowers Parliament to give grants in aid from the Consolidated Fund of India to States in need, including for Scheduled Tribes and Scheduled Areas.
    • Article 280: Requires the President to constitute a Finance Commission every five years to recommend vertical and horizontal devolution, the principles of grants in aid, and measures to augment State funds for local bodies.
    • Article 282: Permits the Union or a State to make grants for any public purpose, the constitutional basis for many discretionary and centrally sponsored transfers.
    • Articles 243-I and 243-Y: Require States to constitute State Finance Commissions every five years for Panchayats and Municipalities respectively.
    • Article 293: Lets States borrow within India, but a State indebted to the Union needs Union consent for further borrowing.
    • Article 279A: Establishes the GST Council, institutionalising cooperative Union State decision making on indirect taxes.

    [2023] Consider the following :
    1. Demographic performance
    2. Forest and ecology
    3. Governance reforms
    4. Stable government
    5. Tax and fiscal efforts
    For the horizontal tax devolution, the Fifteenth Finance Commission used how many of the above as criteria other than population area and income distance?
    (a) Only two
    (b) Only three
    (c) only four
    (d) All five

  • [5th August 2026] The Hindu OpED: Jammu and Kashmir: the elusive quest for Statehood

    PYQ Relevance
    [UPSC 2016]     To what extent is Article 370 temporary? Discuss future prospects.
    Linkage: The PYQ directly tests the constitutional character of Article 370 that this article’s central event revolves around. Now after its abrogation the theme extends to statehood demand of J&K.

    Mentor’s Comment

    August 5, 2026, marks seven years since Jammu and Kashmir’s special status under Article 370 was revoked; August 9 will mark seven years since it lost Statehood. Seven years on, the promised trade-off of temporary central control for security and economic growth remains unfulfilled, even as the Lieutenant-Governor’s unaccountable powers have expanded further.

    Has the trade-off of temporary central control for security and economic growth delivered its promised outcomes?

    1. No formal emergency, emergency-scale measures: The 2019 actions were accompanied by troop deployment, detention of over 5,000 political leaders and cadre, curfew, and a communications blockade, without any emergency being formally declared.
    2. Violence has spread, not receded: Terrorist attacks continued in 2025 at Pahalgam in April and Delhi’s Red Fort in November, and violence spread to previously dormant areas such as Poonch-Rajouri and adjoining districts.
    3. Economic convergence has reversed: J&K’s per capita income as a share of the national average fell from 79.9% in 2013-14 to 76.6%, per the J&K Economic Survey 2025-26, a decline of 3.3 percentage points.
    4. Unemployment remains structurally high: Overall unemployment is close to twice the national average; graduate unemployment stands at 23.9%.
    5. Peaceful response met with intensified control: Kashmiris responded to the Pahalgam attack with peace marches and candlelit demonstrations, but the Union Home Ministry responded with the most militarised Amarnath Yatra in J&K’s history, routine PSA and UAPA charges, summons to over 2,000 people after a single incident, near-continuous curfews, and the highest number of internet shutdowns of any region in the country since 2019.

    What made the process of revoking Article 370 and Statehood constitutionally unprecedented?

    1. Executive fiat over Article 370: Article 370 was hollowed out through executive action; the Governor later stated he was directed by the Union Home Minister to sign.
    2. Legislative fiat over Statehood: Statehood was removed through Parliament without consulting J&K’s people or its elected political leadership.
    3. First such downgrade since 1956: J&K became the first State since Delhi in 1956 to lose Statehood.
    4. Basic structure implications: Together, the two actions represent a departure from constitutional principles and the basic structure of the Union.
    5. Treated as an exception, not a precedent: The actions were framed as specific to a conflict-ridden J&K rather than examined as part of a broader strain on India’s constitutional democracy.

    Why have judicial and administrative checks failed to restore accountable government in J&K?

    1. Prolonged judicial deference: The Supreme Court allowed the Union’s security-justification argument to stand unchallenged for four years before weakly recommending that Statehood be restored “as soon as possible.”
    2. No timeline since: Three years after that recommendation, the Court has not heard petitions seeking a definite restoration timeline.
    3. No test of necessity: At no point has the Court examined the Union’s measures against constitutional or pragmatic standards of necessity.
    4. Six-month limit bypassed: The Constitution caps emergency conditions at six months, yet J&K has remained under emergency-like conditions for seven years without formal invocation.
    5. Lieutenant-Governor holds core powers: Under the 2024 Transaction of Business Rules, the Lieutenant-Governor, an appointee, controls the administration, police, and government prosecutors, despite J&K having had an elected government since 2024.
    6. Powers still expanding: The Lieutenant-Governor has since been granted emergency powers over telecommunications.
    7. High Court strictures without reform: The J&K High Court has repeatedly criticised the police’s misuse of draconian laws, without this leading to institutional reform.

    Why is the security-driven justification for prolonged unaccountable rule fundamentally flawed?

    1. Moral flaw: The claim that subjugation is a means to a desirable end conceals the fact that subjugation is a repugnant end in itself, never a legitimate means.
    2. Pragmatic flaw: Subjugation breeds disaffection, which expresses itself as violence once peaceful means of expression are disallowed, a pattern India has already experienced under colonial rule.
    3. Empirical failure confirms the flaw: The continued rise and spread of violence, alongside declining economic indicators, demonstrates that the justification has failed on its own practical terms.
    4. Judicial non-scrutiny entrenches the flaw: The absence of any judicial test of the argument’s utility has allowed it to function as a durable substitute for accountable governance rather than a genuinely temporary emergency measure.

    What would it take for J&K to move from unaccountable control to democratic accountability?

    1. Constitutional design points to elected government: The Constitution recognises an elected administration as the only structure capable of delivering accountability.
    2. Downstream institutions depend on it: An independent legislature, institutional oversight, autonomous bodies, and a free media all require an elected administration to develop.
    3. Civil society space is conditional: Civil society gains room to push for reform under an elected administration that it lacks under an appointed one.
    4. Renewed political campaign: J&K’s National Conference has renewed the campaign for Statehood restoration, earlier pursued only fitfully by the Congress, now framed explicitly around accountability.
    5. A record of “ugly firsts”: J&K has been the first State to see wide use of semi-lethal pellet guns (2016), the first to lose special status and Statehood (2019), and the first to undergo a communal delimitation altering Jammu’s demography through additional Hindu-majority constituencies (2022).
    6. A possible “positive first”: The 2024 State election produced a majority for the pluralist National Conference-Congress alliance despite the delimitation exercise, showing that engineered political outcomes can be overcome through the ballot; Statehood restoration would be a fitting next “first.”

    Conclusion

    Seven years of Central rule in Jammu and Kashmir have not delivered the promised improvements in security or economic development. Instead, power has become concentrated in the Lieutenant Governor, reducing the role of the elected government. The argument that prolonged Central control is necessary for security is flawed because it weakens democratic accountability and can increase public alienation. Restoring Statehood remains the constitutional path to accountable governance, but it requires timely political and judicial action rather than indefinite delay.

  • India resets ties with Bangladesh and invites its new leader to the BRICS Summit

    Why in the News

    India distanced itself from former Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina’s public event in Delhi while inviting Bangladesh’s new leader to the 18th BRICS Summit in his capacity as BIMSTEC Chair, signalling a recalibration of ties with Dhaka.

    What is BIMSTEC?

    • Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC) is a regional organization established in 1997 to promote economic, technical, and security cooperation in the Bay of Bengal region.
    • Members: Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Myanmar, Nepal, Sri Lanka, and Thailand
    • Secretariat: Dhaka, Bangladesh.

    What is the BRICS Outreach Session?

    • A special session where BRICS invites leaders of regional organizations and partner countries.
    • Bangladesh was invited in its capacity as the current BIMSTEC Chair.

    Why is India Recalibrating Ties?

    • Relations changed after Bangladesh’s political transition.
    • India has resumed engagement with the new government through diplomatic outreach and restoration of visa services.
    • Distancing from Sheikh Hasina’s event signals neutrality toward Bangladesh’s internal politics.

    Challenges in India-Bangladesh Relations

    • Anti-India sentiment in sections of Bangladeshi society.
    • Sheikh Hasina’s presence in India.
    • Teesta River water-sharing dispute.
    • Border management, smuggling, and illegal migration.
    • Security of minorities.
    • Growing Chinese strategic and economic influence in Bangladesh.

    [2026] Match List I (BIMSTEC Centre) with List II (Location):
    A. BIMSTEC Cultural Industries Observatory
    B. BIMSTEC Energy Centre
    C. BIMSTEC Centre for Weather and Climate
    D. BIMSTEC Technology Transfer Facility
    1. NOIDA 2. Bengaluru 3. Colombo 4. Thimphu
    (a) A-3, B-2, C-1, D-4
    (b) A-3, B-1, C-2, D-4
    (c) A-4, B-2, C-1, D-3
    (d) A-4, B-1, C-2, D-3

  • India Japan mobility deepens through the Specified Skilled Worker route and Assam semiconductors

    Why in the News?

    Youth from India’s Northeast are training as caregivers and agriculture workers for an ageing Japan under the Specified Skilled Worker (SSW) programme. This channels India’s demographic surplus into Japan’s labour shortage and links mobility to investment such as Japanese financed projects and the Assam semiconductor ecosystem.

    What is the Specified Skilled Worker (SSW) programme?

    1. Residence status from 2019: Japan introduced the SSW status of residence in 2019 to let blue collar foreign workers obtain a working visa for up to five years.
    2. Eligibility: Applicants must pass a Japanese language test and a specified skills exam in one of 16 fields, including nursing care, food and beverage manufacturing and industrial products.

    What is Official Development Assistance (ODA) through JICA?

    1. JICA loans: The Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) is Japan’s development agency that extends concessional ODA loans for infrastructure and social projects.
    2. Northeast footprint: JICA finances road corridors in Meghalaya, health facilities in Mizoram, Nagaland and Assam, and is joining Assam’s semiconductor ambitions.

    What is the A-SEMI project?

    1. Assam semiconductor ecosystem: The Assam Semiconductor Ecosystem on Manufacturing and Innovation (A-SEMI) is a state government project with JICA, alongside Tata Electronics’ assembly and testing facility expected to begin production this year.
    2. Research linkage: A Japanese firm signed a memorandum with IIT Guwahati for collaborative research in semiconductor manufacturing.

    Why is Japan turning to foreign workers?

    1. The 2040 problem: Japan’s working population is projected to fall from 66.34 million in 2025 to 55.42 million in 2040, threatening severe labour shortages.
    2. Ageing pressure: By 2040 there will be three seniors aged 65 and above for every teenager under 15.
    3. Scaled intake: Japan expects to accept 8.05 lakh Specified Skill Workers by the end of March 2029, with highest demand in industrial manufacturing, food and beverages and nursing care.

    How does this pathway serve India and the Northeast?

    1. Remittances: A caregiver in Japan can send home Rs 50,000 to Rs 60,000 a month, far above local nursing wages of around Rs 15,000.
    2. State backing: Assam subsidises SSW training fees, Manipur University opened a Japanese Language Centre, and Mizoram signed agreements with training centres.
    3. Cultural affinity: Widespread interest in Japanese media and easier physical assimilation draw young people from the region into the programme.

    Where does India stand among Japan’s foreign workforce?

    1. China leads: China was the largest foreign resident group in Japan at the end of 2025 with 9.3 lakh residents.
    2. Ahead of India: Vietnam, South Korea, the Philippines and Nepal all rank above India in resident numbers.
    3. India’s small slice: There were 53,974 Indian nationals in Japan as of December 2024, a fraction of the foreign worker pool.
    4. The joint target: India and Japan set an aspirational target of exchanging more than 5,00,000 personnel in both directions over five years, including 50,000 skilled personnel from India.

    What are the challenges to India Japan labour mobility?

    1. Language barrier: School level Japanese proves inadequate for daily workplace use, slowing settlement and placement.
    2. Migration safeguards: Ensuring legal, documented channels is essential to prevent exploitation of workers moving abroad.
    3. Skill drain: Trained nurses and caregivers leaving India can deepen shortages in the Northeast’s own health system.
    4. Small scale: Placement numbers remain nascent relative to Japan’s demand and India’s demographic potential.
    5. Isolation and costs: New arrivals face social loneliness and heavy documentation and relocation costs before earning.
    6. Certification bottlenecks: Delays such as the Certificate of Eligibility can stall departures despite cleared exams.

    Conclusion

    India Japan mobility is at an early but expanding stage, with the SSW route, JICA financed projects and the A-SEMI semiconductor plan tying labour flows to investment. The next milestone is the launch of the A-SEMI project and progress towards the joint target of 5,00,000 personnel over five years, alongside Japan’s planned intake of 8.05 lakh Specified Skill Workers by March 2029.

    Back2Basics:

    Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)

    1. Type: Japan’s governmental agency for delivering Official Development Assistance (ODA).
    2. Headquarters: Tokyo, Japan.
    3. Mandate: Provides concessional loans, grants and technical cooperation for infrastructure and social development in partner countries.
    4. India role: A major bilateral development partner financing metro rail, connectivity, health and industrial projects, including in the Northeast.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2019] The time has come for India and Japan to build a strong contemporary relationship, one involving global and strategic partnership that will have a great significance for Asia and the world as a whole.” Comment.

    Linkage: The question examines the strategic and economic dimensions of the India-Japan Special Strategic and Global Partnership. The article shows how India-Japan ties are expanding beyond infrastructure to skilled mobility, human resource cooperation and semiconductor collaboration, deepening the strategic partnership.

  • The race for the next UN Secretary General and the UNSC straw poll

    Why in the News?

    The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) held its first straw poll to choose the next United Nations Secretary General (UNSG), whose five year term begins on 1 January 2027. The exercise exposed that the outcome turns on acceptability to the five permanent members and their veto, not on multilateral merit.

    How is the UN Secretary General appointed?

    1. Article 97 of the UN Charter: The Secretary General is appointed by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council.
    2. Security Council primacy: The Council forwards a single name to the General Assembly for endorsement, giving it decisive control over the choice.

    What is the process for candidate nomination and campaigning?

    1. Public hearings: Candidates present their vision statements in the General Assembly for transparency and answer questions from member states (informal dialogues)
    2. Joint letter: The UNSC President and the UNGA President will jointly write a formal letter to all member states asking them to nominate candidates.
    3. Nominations: Member States officially submit the names of their candidates, including their biodata.

    What is a straw poll?

    1. Secret ballot: The 15-nation Security Council (UNSC) conducts a series of secret ballots (Straw Polls) to assess the strength of the candidates.
    2. Voting options: UNSC members mark slips carrying a candidate’s name as encourage, discourage, or no opinion, without disclosing which state voted how.
    3. Signalling a veto: In later rounds the slips of the permanent members are coloured, so a coloured discourage slip indicates a likely veto by a permanent member.
    4. Minimum votes: A candidate must receive at least 9 positive votes and no vetoes from the P5 countries to be elected
    5. Single name: The Security Council finalizes the name of a single candidate and recommends it to the General Assembly by secret resolution

    Who are the five permanent members that decide the outcome?

    1. The P5: China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States hold permanent seats with veto power.
    2. Non permanent members: Ten members are elected for two year terms by the General Assembly, giving the Council 15 members in total.

    How is the approval given by the General Assembly?

    1. Final vote: The General Assembly (UNGA), which has 193 member states, will vote on the name sent by the Security Council.
    2. Majority: Usually this option is approved unanimously or by a simple majority.
    3. Term of Office: The elected Secretary General will be appointed for a term of 5 years. They will be eligible for re-election

    Why do the permanent members dominate the selection?

    1. The consensus threshold: Repeated straw polls run until one candidate secures nine encourage slips and no coloured discourage slip, meaning support of the majority and no veto.
    2. Acceptability over merit: Success may go not to the strongest diplomatic candidate but to one acceptable to all five permanent members.
    3. Great power divergence: The three front runners enjoy good relations with the United States, yet China and Russia may hold their own views that reshape the field.

    Who are the front runners and what regional logic applies?

    1. Regional rotation: With the current holder from Portugal and predecessors from Asia and Africa, expectation favours a candidate from Latin America.
    2. A woman contender: No woman has held the post, strengthening the case for a female Latin American candidate.
    3. Leading names: The head of UN Trade and Development from Costa Rica, Guyana’s Permanent Representative, and the Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) from Argentina scored well.
    4. Open field: There is no bar on new entrants, so more candidates may emerge as the process unfolds.

    What are the challenges to the UNSG selection process

    1. Opaque bargaining: Decisive negotiations occur privately among the P5, limiting the General Assembly to endorsement.
    2. Veto capture: A single permanent member can block the most qualified candidate through a coloured discourage slip.
    3. Underrepresentation: Regions such as Latin America have never held the post, exposing a persistent geographic imbalance.
    4. Limited transparency reforms: Public candidate hearings introduced in recent cycles have not displaced the closed straw poll as the real gatekeeper.
    5. Great power rivalry: East and West divisions within the P5 can deadlock the choice and force compromise candidates.
    6. No fixed criteria: The absence of binding qualifications lets geopolitical acceptability outweigh administrative competence.

    Conclusion

    The next Secretary General will be selected through a Security Council process where the veto makes acceptability to the P5 the decisive test. Straw polling has begun with Latin American front runners, and further rounds with coloured slips will reveal whether any candidate can clear the veto threshold before the term begins on 1 January 2027.

    Back2Basics:

    United Nations Security Council (UNSC)

    1. Formation Year: 1945.
    2. Headquarters: New York City, United States.
    3. Mandate: Primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security.
    4. Composition: 15 members; 5 permanent members (United States, United Kingdom, France, Russia, China) with veto power and 10 non permanent members elected for two year terms.
    5. Powers: Can authorise peacekeeping, sanctions, military action and the admission of new UN members.

    Role of UN- Secretary General

    The Secretary-General of the United Nations acts as the chief administrative officer, global diplomat, and spokesperson for the organization. Current officeholder António Guterres leads the United Nations by managing daily operations, mediating global conflicts, and bringing threats to international peace to the Security Council.

    Administrative Duties

    1. Manages the UN Secretariat and its global staff.
    2. Prepares the organization’s budget and handles financial administration.
    3. Appoints top UN officials and staff members.

    Diplomatic and Political Role

    1. Mediates disputes between member nations.
    2. Warns the Security Council about any crisis that may threaten world peace.
    3. Serves as a neutral global moral voice and public advocate for vulnerable people

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2025] The reform process in the United Nations remains unresolved, because of the delicate imbalance of East and West and entanglement of the USA vs. Russo-Chinese alliance. Examine and critically evaluate the East-West policy confrontations in this regard.

    Linkage: The question examines how East-West rivalry and P5 politics have stalled reforms in the United Nations. The UNSG selection process reflects this unresolved power imbalance, as the P5 veto and geopolitical bargaining outweigh merit in choosing the UN Secretary-General.

  • NATO enters a new strategic era as burden shifts to Europe and openings emerge for India

    Why in the News

    The 36th North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Summit held in Ankara (July 2026) highlighted a shift in transatlantic security, with the United States (US) urging European allies to take greater responsibility for conventional defence, allowing Washington to focus more on the Indo-Pacific.

    What is NATO?

    • North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is a military alliance established in 1949 under the Washington Treaty.
    • Based on collective defence under Article 5, where an attack on one member is considered an attack on all.
    • Members: 32 countries (including Finland and Sweden).

    Key Developments

    • US expects European allies to assume primary responsibility for conventional defence.
    • Greater emphasis on burden-sharing through higher defence spending.
    • US continues as NATO’s: Nuclear guarantor. Strategic enabler. Political leader.

    Evolution of NATO

    • NATO 1.0 (1949-1991): Cold War; deterrence against the Soviet Union.
    • NATO 2.0 (1991-2022): Eastward expansion and operations in the Balkans and Afghanistan.
    • NATO 3.0 (2022 onwards): Europe strengthens conventional defence while the US focuses increasingly on the Indo-Pacific.

    Significance for India

    • Greater US strategic focus on the Indo-Pacific.
    • Enhanced opportunities for India-Europe cooperation in: Defence manufacturing. Artificial Intelligence (AI). Cybersecurity. Semiconductors. Space technology.
    • Supports India’s strategic autonomy through diversified partnerships.

    Challenges

    • Burden-sharing disagreements among NATO members.
    • Europe’s dependence on US military capabilities.
    • Industrial capacity constraints.
    • Continuing Russia-Ukraine conflict.
    • Simultaneous security commitments in Europe and the Indo-Pacific.

    Value Addition

    Article 5: The cornerstone of NATO, providing collective defence. It has been invoked only once, after the 11 September 2001 (9/11) terrorist attacks on the United States.

    Article 10: Allows European states to join NATO by unanimous agreement of existing members.

    • NATO and India
      • India is not a NATO member.
      • India engages with several NATO members through bilateral defence cooperation while maintaining strategic autonomy.

    “[2024] Consider the following pairs:
    Country : Reason for being in the news
    1. Argentina : Worst economic crisis
    2. Sudan : War between the country’s regular army and paramilitary forces
    3. Turkey : Rescinded its membership of NATO
    How many of the pairs given above are correctly matched?
    (a) Only one pair
    (b) Only two pairs
    (c) All three pairs
    (d) None of the pairs

  • Census 2027 finalises Phase 2 questions with caste enumeration

    Why in the News

    Around 28 questions have been finalised for the Population Enumeration phase of Census 2027, which will record caste for all residents for the first time in decades. The enumeration begins on 17 August in Ladakh and snow bound areas ahead of the rest of the country.

    What is the Census in India?

    1. Constitutional and legal basis: The Census is conducted under the Census Act, 1948 by the Registrar General and Census Commissioner of India, and Census is a Union subject in the Seventh Schedule.
    2. Decadal count: It is a decennial enumeration of the entire population covering demographic, social and economic characteristics.

    What are the two phases of Census 2027?

    1. Houselisting phase: The first phase records houses, household amenities and assets.
    2. Population Enumeration: The second phase counts every individual and records personal and household particulars, and is where caste will be captured.

    What is new in Census 2027?

    1. Caste for all: For the first time in decades, the caste of every resident is to be recorded, not only Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes.
    2. Questionnaire: The final questionnaire is likely to carry 28 questions for the Population Enumeration phase.
    3. Phased timing: Snow bound areas of Ladakh, Jammu and Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh and Uttarakhand are counted from 17 August, and the rest of the country in February 2027.

    Why does caste enumeration matter?

    1. Evidence for policy: Caste data informs reservation, welfare targeting and assessment of backwardness beyond SC and ST groups.
    2. Filling a data gap: The last full caste count outside SC and ST dates to 1931, leaving current policy reliant on dated estimates.

    Challenges to caste enumeration in the Census

    1. Classification complexity: Caste names run into thousands with regional and spelling variations, complicating standardised recording.
    2. Self identification: Responses depend on self reporting, which can be inconsistent or strategically stated.
    3. Enumerator training: Accurate capture of caste needs trained enumerators and a controlled code list.
    4. Political sensitivity: Publication of caste numbers can intensify demands for revised reservation shares.
    5. Data privacy: Handling granular caste data raises confidentiality and misuse concerns.

    Census Act, 1948

    1. Central legislation empowering the government to conduct the decennial Census.
    2. Administered by the Registrar General and Census Commissioner of India under the Ministry of Home Affairs.
    3. Makes public cooperation compulsory and guarantees confidentiality of individual records.
    4. Census information is not admissible as evidence in court, protecting respondent data.

    [2009] Consider the following statements:
    1. Between Census 1951 and Census 2001, the density of the population of India has increased more than three times.
    2. Between Census 1951 and Census 2001, the annual growth rate (exponential) of the population of India has doubled.
    (a) 1 only
    (b) 2 only
    (c) Both 1 and 2
    (d) Neither 1 nor 2

  • Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls leaves about 20 lakh names flagged in Punjab

    Why in the News

    The first phase of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Punjab ended with about 20 lakh names flagged as uncollectable. Authorities cited permanent relocation, absence, death and duplicate entries, and opened a claims and objections window.

    What is the Special Intensive Revision (SIR)?

    1. Roll purification drive: SIR is an Election Commission of India (ECI) exercise of house to house enumeration to update and cleanse the electoral roll of ineligible or dead entries.
    2. Fresh verification: Electors submit enumeration forms and are mapped afresh, unlike a routine summary revision that only adds or deletes on application.

    What did the first phase in Punjab find?

    1. Scale of enumeration: Against 2,14,61,043 registered electors as of 9 June, about 1,93,94,408 submitted enumeration forms by 3 August across all 23 districts and 117 constituencies.
    2. Uncollectable forms: A total of 20,66,635 forms, or 9.63% of electors, were categorised as absent, shifted, dead or duplicate.
    3. Breakdown: These include 5,74,568 dead, 4,12,715 untraceable or absent, 9,44,131 permanently shifted, and 1,19,145 enrolled elsewhere.
    4. Mapping: About 93.40% of electors in the draft roll have been mapped.

    Why does the ECI conduct an intensive revision?

    1. Purity of rolls: Removing dead, shifted and duplicate entries reduces the scope for impersonation and bogus voting.
    2. Universal inclusion: House to house verification aims to capture genuine electors missed by application based revision.

    What are the challenges to the SIR exercise?

    1. Wrongful exclusion: Genuine electors who are temporarily absent risk deletion, as seen in disputes over detention and citizenship claims.
    2. Burden of proof: Placing the onus on electors to submit forms can disadvantage migrants, the poor and the less literate.
    3. Enumerator capacity: House to house coverage depends on adequate, trained booth level officers within a tight timeline.
    4. Data reconciliation: Matching shifted and duplicate entries across constituencies and states is error prone.
    5. Political contestation: Large deletions invite allegations of targeted disenfranchisement, straining trust in the roll.

    Conclusion

    The SIR is at the draft roll stage in Punjab, with about 20 lakh names flagged for removal after house to house enumeration. Any person inadvertently left out can file claims and objections between 13 August and 12 September, and notices to unmapped electors will be issued from 13 August, after which the final roll will be published.

    Back2Basics:

    Electoral roll revision

    1. Electoral rolls are prepared and revised under the Representation of the People Act, 1950 and the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960.
    2. The Election Commission of India superintends preparation and revision of rolls.
    3. Revisions may be intensive, involving fresh house to house enumeration, or summary, involving updates on claims and objections.
    4. Eligibility requires Indian citizenship, age of 18 years and ordinary residence in the constituency.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2017] For election to the Lok Sabha, a nomination paper can be filed by
    (a) Anyone residing in India.
    (b) A resident of the constituency from which the election is to be contested.
    (c) Any citizen of India whose name appears in the electoral roll of a constituency.
    (d) Any citizen of India.
    Answer: (c)

  • Supreme Court extends Section 498A cruelty protection to live in relationships

    Why in the News

    The Supreme Court held that protection against cruelty under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 extends to women in live-in relationships, provided the partners share a genuine intent to marry. The ruling is based on Article 14 (Right to Equality).

    What is Section 498A?

    • Penalized cruelty by a husband or his relatives against a woman.
    • Now corresponds to Section 85 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023.
    • Traditionally applied only to legally valid marriages.

    Supreme Court Ruling

    • Adopted a purposive interpretation to address changing social realities.
    • Extended protection to women in live-in relationships where there is: A relationship in the nature of marriage, and A genuine intent to marry.
    • Held that denying such protection violates Article 14.

    Why is the Domestic Violence Act Not Enough?

    • The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence (PWDV) Act, 2005 covers women in relationships in the nature of marriage.
    • However, it provides civil remedies such as: Protection orders, Residence orders, and Maintenance
    • Section 85, BNS provides criminal punishment, offering stronger deterrence.

    Challenges

    • Difficulty in proving intent to marry.
    • Limited documentary evidence in live-in relationships.
    • Possibility of misuse.
    • Overlap between civil remedies under the PWDV Act and criminal proceedings.

    Important Constitutional Provisions

    • Article 14: Equality before law.
    • Article 21: Right to life and personal liberty, including dignity and autonomy.

    Landmark Judgments

    • D. Velusamy v. D. Patchaiammal (2010): Defined “relationship in the nature of marriage.”
    • Indra Sarma v. V.K.V. Sarma (2013): Laid down factors for determining live-in relationships under the PWDV Act.

    [2019] Which Article of the Constitution of India safeguards one’s right to marry the person of one’s choice?

    (a) Article 19

    (b) Article 21

    (c) Article 25

    (d) Article 29

  • What is the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill

    Why in the News?

    Repeated crises in NEET 2024, UGC NET 2024 and NEET 2026 have exposed a gap in how examination breaches are defined and prevented. Despite the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024, closure reports found no prosecutable conventional paper leak, raising the deeper question of institutional accountability.

    What is the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024?

    1. Anti cheating law: It criminalises organised cheating, paper leaks and impersonation in public examinations conducted by central agencies.
    2. Penalties: It prescribes stringent imprisonment and fines and targets service providers and organised gangs, not candidates alone.

    What counts as a paper leak?

    1. Traditional meaning: A paper leak is the unauthorised disclosure of a printed question paper before the exam, during printing, storage or transport.
    2. Broader compromise: Confidential material can leak at question setting, moderation, translation or digitisation, disclosing selected questions without any printed paper being recovered.

    Why do repeated crises yield no prosecutable evidence?

    1. Investigation focus: Probes trace physical papers, so a compromise at the source may never produce recoverable evidence of a conventional leak.
    2. Closure reports: The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) filed closure reports in the 2024 cases, reportedly finding no prosecutable leak under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 or this Act.
    3. Detection failure: In NEET 2026, official action followed a whistleblower’s complaint rather than the exam’s own security or intelligence systems.

    Where does primary accountability lie?

    1. Examination authority: Prevention rests with the examination body, here the National Testing Agency (NTA), not with the CBI, police or courts that act only after a crisis.
    2. Lifecycle safeguards: Accountability must run from selection of question setters and translators to centres, digital systems, evaluation and result processing.

    What is the proposed way forward?

    1. White Paper: A committee headed by the former Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) chairman is to document the full spectrum of breaches across the three examinations.
    2. Integrity framework: This should underpin a Public Examination Integrity Framework (PEIF) prescribing standardised end to end standard operating procedures, conflict of interest management and cybersecurity audits.

    What are the challenges to examination integrity?

    1. Insider access: A small number of individuals with privileged access at setting and moderation are the hardest risk to police.
    2. Coaching ecosystems: Organised coaching networks create demand and channels for leaked or guided material.
    3. Cybersecurity: Digitised question banks and candidate data widen the attack surface beyond physical papers.
    4. Scale: Examinations covering millions of candidates across thousands of centres magnify any single point of failure.
    5. Attribution and prosecution: Source compromises leave little physical evidence, making conviction under penal law difficult.
    6. Conflict of interest: Repeated engagement of the same experts and vendors without rotation weakens independent oversight.

    Conclusion

    The central issue is not the absence of a law but the failure to detect and prevent breaches early. Public confidence will be restored by an examination system with lifecycle safeguards and clear institutional accountability, not by harsher penalties or more logistics after the fact.

    Back2Basics:

    Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024

    1. Central legislation to prevent unfair means in public examinations conducted by bodies like the NTA, UPSC, SSC, railways and banking recruitment.
    2. Defines offences including paper leaks, impersonation and tampering with computer systems.
    3. Provides for imprisonment of three to ten years and fines up to one crore rupees for organised crimes.
    4. Makes offences cognisable, non bailable and non compoundable.

    Defined Unfair Means

    1. Unauthorized access to or leakage of question papers or answer keys.
    2. Assisting candidates physically or via communication devices inside exam halls.
    3. Tampering with computer networks, hardware, or customized software resources.
    4. Creation of fake examination authorities or issuance of bogus admit cards to cheat

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2024] What are the aims and objects of the recently passed and enforced, The Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024? Whether University/State Education Board examinations, too, are covered under the Act?

    Linkage: The question tests the objectives, scope and limitations of the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024. The article evaluates the Act’s implementation, showing that institutional safeguards and accountability remain as important as legal penalties in ensuring examination integrity.