Mentor’s Comment

Inter-State competition in India, once viewed as divisive, is now emerging as one of the strongest drivers of economic growth, investment attraction, administrative efficiency, and innovation. This article breaks down why this shift is historically significant, how it is unfolding across States, and what it means for federalism and India’s long-term development trajectory. 

Why In The News

India is witnessing an unprecedented rise in competitive federalism, where States actively race to attract global and domestic investments, from Google’s new AI centre to semiconductor plants and EV manufacturing. For the first time in decades, State governments, not Delhi’s ministries, are driving India’s economic location decisions. States now pitch aggressively to CEOs, negotiate incentives, and showcase governance models. This marks a sharp contrast with pre-1991 India’s centralised industrial licensing regime, where Delhi decided who could produce, how much, and where. Today, State-led rivalry has matured into a credible, stable, rules-based competition that is fuelling India’s growth story.

Introduction

India’s economic geography is being reshaped by a transformation from centrally orchestrated industrial policy to a system where States compete for investment based on infrastructure, governance quality, policy stability, and business confidence. This shift is strengthening India’s federal structure, enhancing innovation, and raising the overall quality of economic outcomes. Inter-State rivalry, far from fragmenting the Union, is forming a mosaic of distinct strengths that collectively widens national opportunities.

How has India moved from central patronage to competitive federalism?

1. Command-economy restrictions: Earlier, industrial licences, permits, and quotas concentrated power in Delhi; the Centre decided production, capacity, and investment location.
2. Dismantling of industrial licensing (1991): Reforms shifted economic decisions from Delhi to States, enabling States to attract investors by improving infrastructure, governance, and policy stability.
3. Decline of political patronage: States now court industries directly instead of relying on Central ministries; competition incentivises better reforms.
4. Rise of State-led economic diplomacy: States engage corporate boards and CEOs with confidence, signalling maturity in India’s federal design.

What is driving the new wave of inter-State competition?

1. Investment race for global tech mandates: Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, and Karnataka compete for Google’s AI centre, semiconductor units like Micron, and other high-tech industries.
2. Policy predictability: States offer faster clearances, stable taxation, and improved land/utility arrangements that improve investor confidence.
3. Infrastructure differentiation: Gujarat’s infrastructure, Maharashtra’s port ecosystem, and Jharkhand’s mineral base reflect unique competitive edges.
4. Branding and entrepreneurship cultures: Punjab’s business culture, Tamil Nadu’s skilled workforce, and Bengaluru’s innovation ecosystem attract capital.
5. Healthy rivalry: States emulate each other’s best practices, improving ease of doing business holistically.

How do States showcase competitive strengths to attract global investors?

1. Clearances and governance: Andhra’s faster approvals and “predictable governance” models attract industries.
2. Industrial clusters: Noida’s semiconductor parks, Tamil Nadu’s EV manufacturing corridors, and Karnataka’s global capability centres create ecosystems.
3. Strategic subsidies: Concessional utilities, land pricing, and tax benefits remain tools, but the article emphasises that strength now lies in governance and capability, not only subsidies.
4. Narrative-building: States brand themselves:
   1. “The Shenzhen of India” for Noida,
   2. “India in the abstract; India in Bengaluru; India in Bhubaneswar” reflects competitive positioning.
5. Multiple entry points: India’s mosaic of distinct State strengths creates a wide front of opportunities for global investors.

How does inter-State rivalry improve national economic outcomes?

1. Enhanced innovation: Competition fosters experimentation and adoption of best practices.
2. Reduced dependency on Centre: States take responsibility for attracting investment rather than waiting for Central allocations.
3. Better infrastructure standards: Rivalry pushes States to upgrade logistics, industrial parks, and digital infrastructure.
4. Industry diversification: Multiple states develop high-tech clusters, reducing geographic concentration risks.
5. Federal solidarity: The article stresses that competition is healthy, credible, and rooted in a shared pursuit of national development.

Why is the new federal compact significant for India’s future?

1. States pitching confidently: States engage investors directly with clear plans, showing a shift to persuasion-based federalism.
2. Attracting sunrise sectors: Semiconductor manufacturing, EV production, and advanced electronics are expanding beyond traditional hubs.
3. Cross-State synergies: Supply chains, manufacturing networks, and services ecosystems now span across borders.
4. Mature economic federalism: The article argues this is not desperate bidding, but a rational, capability-driven economic design.
5. Rise of State-led growth poles: Competitive strengths in different States collectively strengthen India’s global economic position.

Conclusion

India’s evolving economic federalism represents a deeper structural shift where States act as active economic agents rather than passive recipients of Central policy. This inter-State rivalry, credible, stable, and innovation-driven, is pushing India toward higher-quality investments, diversified regional growth, and improved governance. It is a long-term transformation that reinforces India’s economic resilience and strengthens the Union through productive competition.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now