Parliament – Sessions, Procedures, Motions, Committees etc

Curtailing ‘unparliamentary’ expressions could stifle voice of MPs


From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :

Prelims level : Not much

Mains level : Paper 2- Curtailing unparliamentary expressions


The Lok Sabha secretariat recently released a booklet of unparliamentary words that will henceforth be banned and if used, will be expunged, it created an uproar among the opposing parties.

Historical Background

  • In the early days of parliamentary functioning in England, members would challenge one another to a duel if they felt dishonoured by another member’s speech.
  • It led to the Speaker of the House of Commons removing the offending words from the written proceedings.
  • In 1873, the constitutional theorist Erskine May started recording words and expressions that the Speaker considered unparliamentary in an eponymous guide to parliamentary procedure.
  •  Later editions of the book laid down the principle of parliamentary language.

Who decides the nature of a word

  • MPs have freedom of speech in Parliament.
  • But the presiding officers of Parliament have the final authority on what gets recorded in the day’s proceedings.
  •  MPs can also draw attention to any unparliamentary words and urge the chair to delete them.
  • Any reporting of the parliamentary discussion that includes the deleted portion is a breach of parliamentary privilege and invites the ire of the House.
  • Deleted words are then added by the parliament secretariat to its compilation of unparliamentary expressions.
  • Why context is important? In any language, the context in which an individual uses a word is critical.
  • “Context” means how the word is said, the circumstances in which it is said and when it is said.

Issues with addition of unparliamentary words

  • Effectiveness of measure: The first issues about the list is its effectiveness in maintaining decency in parliamentary debates.
  • Impact on the debate: The second that that needs to be considered is the effectiveness of such a list help in promoting or stifling discussion.
  • Role of technology: Technological advances have ensured that Parliament can no longer control how its proceedings are recorded and disseminated.
  • As a result, even if Parliament edits its record, the unparliamentary expression will be available online.
  • In such a scenario, a compilation of the words classified as unparliamentary will not deter an MP from using them.


Parliament is all about the cut and thrust of debate. And in a political discussion, a restriction of unparliamentary expression, without considering context, will unnecessarily stifle the voices of MPs.

UPSC 2023 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments