Right To Privacy

Deployment of Facial Recognition Systems (FRS) in India

Note4Students

From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :

Prelims level : FRS

Mains level : Right to Privacy Issues

India has seen a rapid deployment of Facial Recognition Systems (FRS) in recent years, both by the Centre and State governments, without putting in place any law to regulate their use.

Facial Recognition System

  • A FRS is a technology capable of matching a human face from a digital image or a video frame against a database of faces.
  • It is typically employed to authenticate users through ID verification services, works by pinpointing and measuring facial features from a given image.

Why in news?

  • There is a growing unabated use of this potentially invasive technology without any safeguards.
  • This poses a huge threat to the fundamental rights to privacy and freedom of speech and expression of the citizens.

FRS in India

  • Currently, 18 FRSs are in active utilisation by the Centre and State governments for the purpose of surveillance, security and authentication of identity.
  • 49 more systems are in the process of being installed by different government agencies.
  • Delhi Police was the first law enforcement agency in the country to start using the technology in 2018.
  • Only Telangana is ahead of Delhi at present with four facial recognition systems in active utilization for surveillance and authentication of identity.

Judicial scrutiny of the move

  • States say that they are authorized by the Delhi High Court in terms of the decision in the case of ‘Sadhan Haldar vs NCT of Delhi’.
  • In that particular case, the High Court had authorized the Delhi police to obtain facial recognition technology for the purpose of tracking and reuniting missing children.
  • FRS may be used in the investigation in the interest of safety and security of the general public.

A potential mis-use?

Ans. Can’t say!

  • Activists pointed out that Delhi Police was now using the FRS, which was meant for tracking missing children, for wider security and surveillance and investigation purpose.
  • There is a “function creep” happening with Police gradually using the technology beyond its intended purpose.
  • For example, the use of FRS to identify accused who took part in the farmers’ tractor rally violence in January this year.

Need of the hour

Ans. Bring accountability

  • Surveillance of any kind happens in secret and the people generally don’t know that they are being watched.
  • The idea behind is to bring light to the fact that these technology systems are being used without any laws in place to regulate them.
  • Police and state authorities should use such technologies for specific and special purposes with proper authorization.

UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments