Imparting direction to science in India


From UPSC perspective, the following things are important :

Prelims level : Not much

Mains level : Paper 3- Fifth Science Policy

The article elaborates on the various aspect of the 5th Science Policy.

Scientific publication from India and issues with it

  • From the report published by the National Science Foundation of the U.S. in December 2019, India was the third-largest publisher of peer-reviewed science and engineering journal articles and conference papers, with 135,788 articles in 2018.
  • This milestone was achieved through an average yearly growth rate of 10.73% from 2008, which was greater than China’s 7.81%.
  • However, China and the United States had about thrice and twice the number, respectively, of India’s publications.
  • Also, the publications from India are not impactful.
  • From the report, in the top 1% of the most cited publications from 2016 (called HCA, or Highly Cited Articles), India’s index score of 0.7 is lower than that of the U.S., China and the European Union.
  • An index score of 1 or more is considered good.
  • The inference for India is that the impact, and hence the citation of publications from India, should improve.

Patents filed by India

  • The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) through their Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) is the primary channel of filing international patent applications.
  • In its report for 2019, WIPO says India filed a modest number of 2,053 patent applications.
  • Compared to the 58,990 applications filed by China and 57,840 by the U.S., India has a long way to go.
  • The Indian Government put in place the National Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Policy in 2016 to “stimulate a dynamic, vibrant and balanced intellectual property rights system”.
  • One of the objectives is human capital development.
  • The mission to foster innovation, replicate it at scale and commercialise it is a work in progress consequent to the policy.

India’s Science Policies

  • There have been four science policies till now, after 1947, with the draft of the fifth policy having been released recently.
  • India’s first science policy adopted in 1958.
  • It led to the establishment of many research institutes and national laboratories, and by 1980.
  • The focus in the second science policy, Technology Policy Statement, in 1983, was technological self-reliance and to use technology to benefit all sections of the society.
  • The Science and Technology Policy 2003, the first science policy after the economic liberalisation of 1991, aimed to increase investment in research and development and brought it to 0.7%.
  • The Scientific and Engineering Research Board (SERB) was established to promote research.
  • In 2013, India’s science policy included Innovation in its scope and was called Science, Technology and Innovation Policy.
  • The focus was to be one of the top five global scientific leaders, which India achieved.

What 5th science policy seeks to achieve

  • The draft of the Science, Technology and Innovation Policy 2020 (STIP2020)  has an ambitious vision to “double the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) researchers, Gross Domestic Expenditure on R&D (GERD) and private sector contribution to the GERD every 5 years” .
  • It also aims to “position India among the top three scientific superpowers in the next decade”.
  • It also defines strategies to improve funding for and participation in research. India’s Gross Domestic Expenditure on R&D (GERD) is currently around 0.6% of GDP.
  • This is quite low when compared to the investments by the U.S. and China which are greater than 2% and Israel’s GERD is more than 4%.
  • The policy seeks to define strategies that are “decentralized, evidence-informed, bottom-up, experts-driven, and inclusive”.

Solutions to improve funding

  • STIP2020 defines solutions to improve funding thus: all States to fund research, multinational corporations to participate in research, fiscal incentives and support for innovation in medium and small scale enterprises.
  • The new measures should not become a pretext to absolve the Union and State governments of their primacy in funding research; the government should invest more into research.

Other critical focus areas

  • 1) Other critical focal areas ar inclusion of under-represented groups of people in research.
  • 2) Support for indigenous knowledge systems.
  • 3) Using artificial intelligence.
  • 4) Reaching out to the Indian scientific diaspora for collaboration.
  • 5) Science diplomacy with partner countries.
  • 6) Setting up a strategic technology development fund to give impetus to research.


More specific directives and implementation with a scientific temper without engaging in hyperbole will be key to the policy’s success; and its success is important to us because, as Carl Sagan said, “we can do science, and with it we can improve our lives”.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments