💥UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (June Batch) + Access XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Archives: News

  • Seeds, Pesticides and Mechanization – HYV, Indian Seed Congress, etc.

    Coconut Root Wilt Disease

    Prelims Only | Science Tech | Mains Paper 3: Awareness in various sc and tech fields

    Why in the News?

    Coconut Root Wilt Disease is witnessing rapid spread across major coconut growing regions of Kerala, Tamil Nadu and Karnataka, affecting lakhs of coconut palms and causing severe yield losses.

    About

    • Chronic, non fatal disease of coconut
    • Caused by a phytoplasma which is a phloem limited pathogen
    • Leads to long term decline in palm health and productivity
    • Infected palms remain alive and act as persistent inoculum sources

    Origin and spread

    • First reported over 150 years ago from Erattupetta, Kerala
    • Continues as an endemic disease in southern India
    • Vector borne transmission is the primary mode of spread
    • Spread accelerates due to continuous coconut belts
    • Wind assisted vector movement enhances transmission
    • Abiotic stress such as temperature extremes and biotic stress like new sucking pests increase susceptibility

    Vector

    • Spread by sap sucking insect vectors
    • Important vectors include Stephanitis typica and Proutista moesta

    UPSC Prelims Pointers

    • Disease is non fatal but debilitating
    • Caused by phytoplasma
    • Spread through insect vectors
    • Endemic to southern India
    • Management focuses on tolerance, soil health and stress reduction
    [2018] Consider the following: 

    1. Birds 

    2. Dust blowing 

    3. Rain 

    4. Wind blowing

    Which of the above spread plant diseases? 

    (a) 1 and 3 only (b) 3 and 4 only (c) 1, 2 and 4 only (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • Corruption Challenges – Lokpal, POCA, etc

    Central Vigilance Commission (CVC)

    Prelims Only | Governance | Mains Paper 2: Governance, Transparency & Accountability, Citizens Charters,Laws, Institutions & Bodies Constituted For The Vulnerable Sections

    Why in the News?

    Shri Praveen Vashista, IPS (Bihar cadre, 1991 batch), has been appointed as Vigilance Commissioner in the Central Vigilance Commission and took oath on 16 January 2026.

    About Central Vigilance Commission (CVC)

    • Apex integrity and vigilance institution of the Government of India
    • Mandated to promote integrity, transparency and accountability in public administration
    • Prevents corruption in Central Government organisations

    Established in

    • 1964 through an executive resolution of the Government of India
    • Granted statutory status under the Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003

    Historical background

    • Originated from recommendations of the Santhanam Committee (1962 to 1964)
    • Initially functioned without statutory backing, limiting enforcement authority
    • Became an independent statutory body in 2003, strengthening supervisory and advisory powers

    Composition and members

    • Central Vigilance Commissioner as Chairperson
    • Up to two Vigilance Commissioners as Members
    • Appointed by the President of India on recommendation of a high level committee
    • Tenure of four years or up to 65 years of age, whichever is earlier

    UPSC Prelims Pointers

    • Statutory body since 2003
    • Superintendence over CBI limited to corruption cases
    • Chairperson and Members appointed by the President
    • Fixed tenure with age limit
    • Nodal authority for whistleblower protection
    [2025] Consider the following statements about Lokpal: 

    I. The power of Lokpal applies to public servants of India, but not to the Indian public servants posted outside India

    II. The Chairperson or a Member shall not be a Member of the Parliament or a Member of the Legislature of any State or Union Territory, and only the Chief Justice of India, whether incumbent or retired, has to be its Chairperson

    III. The Chairperson or a Member shall not be a person of less than forty-five years of age on the date of assuming office

    IV. Lokpal cannot inquire into the allegations of corruption against a sitting Prime Minister of India

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct? 

    (a) III only (b) II and III (c) I and IV (d) None of the above statements is correct

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • Foreign Policy Watch: India-United States

    [17th January 2026] The Hindu OpED: On mute: On the U.S., geopolitical turmoil, India’s response

    op-ed snap | International Relations | Mains Paper 2: Bilateral, Regional and Global Groupings and agreements involving India

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2019] What introduces friction into the ties between India and the United States is that Washington is still unable to find for India a position in its global strategy, which would satisfy India’s National self- esteem and ambitions. Explain with suitable examples.

    Linkage: The question directly links to GS-II themes of India-US relations, strategic autonomy, and impact of great-power policies on India’s national interests. It reflects recurring UPSC focus on India’s discomfort with subordinate roles in U.S. strategy, evident in issues like sanctions, trade coercion, and technology access.

    Mentor’s Comment

    This article examines India’s muted diplomatic response to escalating unilateral actions by the United States across Venezuela, Iran, and South America, and evaluates the strategic, economic, and reputational costs of restraint. It raises a fundamental question for Indian foreign policy: whether silence safeguards national interest or erodes strategic autonomy at a critical geopolitical moment.

    Why in the News

    India’s foreign policy is being questioned as the U.S. takes increasingly unilateral actions, including regime-change threats in Venezuela and Iran and harsh tariff measures against countries trading with Russia and Iran. Despite being directly affected, India has avoided openly naming the U.S. or asserting its legal and strategic position. This silence is notable given India’s economic exposure, its investments in projects like Chabahar port, and its ambition to host the BRICS+ Summit, making the costs of restraint more visible.

    Why is U.S. conduct described as unilateral and destabilising?

    1. Regime Interventionism: Signals disregard for sovereignty through actions in Venezuela, including the kidnapping of the President and his wife, violating core principles of international law.
    2. Coercive Trade Instruments: Mandates up to 500% tariffs on countries purchasing oil or uranium from Russia, weaponising trade policy for geopolitical compliance.
    3. Expansion of Threat Theatre: Extends regime-change rhetoric beyond Venezuela to Cuba and Colombia, indicating regional destabilisation.
    4. Economic Coercion on Iran: Threatens 25% additional tariffs on any country trading with Iran, escalating sanctions into secondary punishment mechanisms.

    How has India officially responded to these developments?

    1. Diplomatic Language: Restricts response to expressions of “deep concern” without identifying U.S. violations or naming the perpetrator.
    2. Selective Silence: Avoids comment on Venezuela’s leadership abduction and threats to Cuba and Colombia due to perceived geographic distance.
    3. Operational Focus: Issues travel advisories for Iran and Israel and prepares evacuation plans for Indian students, prioritising contingency over diplomacy.
    4. Economic Retrenchment: Signals intent to further reduce already low levels of trade with Iran under U.S. pressure.

    Why is India’s silence on Iran particularly puzzling?

    1. Strategic Neighbourhood: Iran is a close regional neighbour with deep historical ties to India.
    2. Economic Investment: India has invested billions of dollars in the Chabahar port, which faces direct U.S. pressure for shutdown.
    3. Policy Inconsistency: Avoids comment on Iranian protests while also remaining silent on U.S. threats of strikes and tariffs.
    4. Asymmetric Signalling: Demonstrates risk-aversion despite direct national interest exposure.

    What explains New Delhi’s restrained posture towards Washington?

    1. Diplomatic Calculus: Anticipates improvement in ties following a tense year and failure to conclude the India-U.S. Bilateral Trade Agreement.
    2. Optimistic Signalling: Relies on assurances from U.S. Ambassador Sergio Gor regarding future cooperation.
    3. Technology Expectations: Seeks inclusion in the U.S.-led high-technology partnership Pax Silica, despite late-stage entry.
    4. Risk Avoidance: Assumes silence prevents further downturn in bilateral relations.

    What are the costs of this approach for India?

    1. Economic Loss: Tariff threats and trade disruption directly harm Indian economic interests.
    2. Reputational Damage: Weakens India’s image as an autonomous and principled global actor.
    3. Strategic Erosion: Undermines India’s long-standing doctrine of strategic autonomy.
    4. Multilateral Credibility: Weakens leadership standing ahead of hosting the BRICS+ Summit.

    What lesson does India’s past experience offer?

    1. 2019 Precedent: India ceased purchasing Iranian and Venezuelan oil under U.S. pressure.
    2. Policy Outcome: Concessions failed to secure long-term protection of Indian interests.
    3. Strategic Insight: Demonstrates that appeasement of a global power does not ensure national interest protection.

    Conclusion

    India’s restrained diplomacy reflects a short-term tactical calculation but risks long-term strategic dilution. National interest cannot be secured through silence or accommodation, but only through a clear assertion of strategic autonomy rooted in international law, economic self-interest, and diplomatic consistency.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • Foreign Policy Watch: India-Iran

    Talks on Chabahar will continue with U.S. and Iran: India

    Explained | International Relations | Mains Paper 2: Bilateral, Regional and Global Groupings and agreements involving India

    Why in the News

    India’s investments at Chabahar have come under renewed scrutiny after the U.S. President Donald Trump announced fresh tariff measures penalising countries trading with Iran. Media reports suggested India may exit Chabahar, but the Ministry of External Affairs clarified that a U.S. sanctions waiver remains valid till April 26, 2026, and negotiations with Washington are ongoing. The development is significant as it tests India’s ability to sustain strategic projects amid great-power economic coercion while preserving regional connectivity interests.

    Why has Chabahar become a focal point of India-U.S.-Iran tensions?

    1. U.S. Tariff Announcement: Imposes an additional 25% tariff on countries trading with Iran while engaging with the U.S., directly affecting India’s Iran-linked projects.
    2. Sanctions Context: Re-imposition of U.S. sanctions on Chabahar on September 29, 2025, revived uncertainty over India’s operational continuity.
    3. Strategic Sensitivity: Chabahar represents a rare U.S.-exempted India-Iran project, making it a litmus test for sanctions diplomacy.

    What is the status of the U.S. sanctions waiver on Chabahar?

    1. Treasury Guidance: A conditional sanctions waiver issued on October 28, 2025, remains valid until April 26, 2026.
    2. Negotiation Window: Provides India time to negotiate continued engagement without immediate punitive action.
    3. Diplomatic Engagement: India remains in active discussions with Washington to extend or recalibrate the arrangement.

    How has India officially responded to reports of winding up operations?

    1. MEA Clarification: Officially denied claims that India is exiting Chabahar.
    2. Continuity of Dialogue: India and Iran maintain engagement across difficult phases, including periods of intense Western sanctions.
    3. Operational Flexibility: Officials did not rule out renewal or continuation of work at the port.

    Why is Chabahar strategically critical for India?

    1. Regional Connectivity: Provides India direct access to Afghanistan and Central Asia, bypassing Pakistan.
    2. Geopolitical Balancing: Acts as a counter to Pakistan’s Gwadar port developed with Chinese support.
    3. Security and Trade: Enables humanitarian supplies and trade with Taliban-ruled Afghanistan.

    How do current diplomatic engagements shape the outcome?

    1. High-Level Talks: External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar is expected to meet U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio next month.
    2. Iran Engagement: Mr. Jaishankar recently spoke with Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi amid internal unrest in Iran.
    3. Institutional Mechanism: The 20th India-Iran Joint Commission Meeting (May 2025) continues to anchor long-term cooperation.

    Conclusion

    India’s Chabahar engagement underscores a calibrated foreign policy approach that balances strategic autonomy, regional connectivity, and economic exposure to sanctions. The continuation of the U.S. waiver and sustained diplomatic engagement signal India’s intent to preserve long-term strategic interests without precipitate withdrawal.

    Value Addition: Chabahar Port

    Strategic Significance

    1. Alternative Connectivity Corridor: Enables India’s access to Afghanistan and Central Asia bypassing Pakistan, overcoming geographic and political constraints.
    2. Counter-Gwadar Strategy: Offsets China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) leverage centred on Gwadar port.
    3. Indian Ocean Outreach: Extends India’s strategic footprint into the western Indian Ocean littoral.

    Economic and Trade Relevance

    1. Transit Trade Hub: Facilitates movement of Indian goods to Afghanistan and Central Asia, reducing transport time and costs.
    2. Humanitarian Corridor: Serves as a key route for food grains and relief supplies to Afghanistan during sanctions and instability.
    3. Logistics Integration: Links with International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC), enhancing Eurasian trade connectivity.

    Geopolitical and Diplomatic Dimensions

    1. Sanctions Diplomacy Case Study: Demonstrates India’s ability to negotiate issue-based exemptions within U.S. sanctions regimes.
    2. Strategic Autonomy Indicator: Reflects India’s balanced engagement with competing power blocs without formal alignment.
    3. Regional Stability Lever: Maintains diplomatic channels with Iran amid West Asia turbulence.

    Security and Regional Stability

    1. Afghanistan Access: Provides India strategic presence near Taliban-ruled Afghanistan without on-ground military involvement.
    2. Maritime Security: Enhances monitoring capability near key Sea Lines of Communication (SLOCs).
    3. Counter-Extremism Support: Enables non-military engagement in fragile regions through trade and development.

    Institutional and Policy Framework

    1. Bilateral Mechanism: Anchored under India-Iran Joint Commission framework for long-term cooperation.
    2. Operational Model: Managed by Indian entities under conditional sanctions waivers, reflecting adaptive diplomacy.
    3. Time-Bound Waivers: Illustrates uncertainty in infrastructure diplomacy under unilateral sanctions.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2018] In what ways would the ongoing US-Iran Nuclear Pact Controversy affect the national interest of India? How should India respond to its situation?

    Linkage: The question examines the impact of great-power sanctions politics on India’s foreign policy choices, strategic autonomy, and energy-connectivity interests. U.S. sanctions pressure on Iran impacts India’s Chabahar engagement, underscoring India’s calibrated diplomacy to protect strategic interests.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • Start-up Ecosystem In India

    Nearly 44,000 startups registered in 2025, highest since the launch of Startup India

    Explained | Economics | Mains Paper 3: Effects Of Liberalization On The Economy, Changes In Industrial Policy and their effects on Industrial Growth

    Why in the News

    India registered nearly 44,000 startups in 2025, the highest annual addition since the launch of Startup India in 2016, marking a decisive acceleration in entrepreneurial activity. The Prime Minister announced that India now hosts over 2 lakh startups and nearly 125 unicorns, reflecting a structural shift from a risk-averse economy to one driven by innovation, capital formation, and job creation. This scale-up positions India as the third-largest startup ecosystem globally, indicating a transformation in growth drivers over the past decade.

    How has Startup India altered the scale of entrepreneurship in India?

    1. Startup Proliferation: Expanded from fewer than 500 startups a decade ago to over 200,000 registered startups, indicating ecosystem maturity.
    2. Annual Acceleration: Addition of 44,000 startups in 2025 alone, the largest single-year increase since inception.
    3. Global Standing: Establishes India as the third-largest startup ecosystem, enhancing economic visibility and investor confidence.

    What does the rise in unicorns indicate about ecosystem depth?

    1. Unicorn Expansion: Growth from four unicorns in 2014 to nearly 125 active unicorns, reflecting scale viability.
    2. Capital Maturity: Transition of unicorns towards initial public offerings (IPOs) signals capital market integration.
    3. Employment Generation: Scaling startups contribute to job creation beyond traditional sectors, supporting inclusive growth.

    How has societal perception of risk-taking changed?

    1. Cultural Shift: Risk-taking normalised and respected, replacing preference for fixed-salary employment.
    2. Entrepreneurial Aspiration: Acceptance of ideas previously considered fringe, strengthening innovation culture.
    3. Labour Market Impact: Encourages self-employment and venture creation as mainstream career choices.

    What role has state-backed risk capital played?

    1. Fund of Funds (FoF): Over ₹25,000 crore invested through government-backed FoF mechanisms.
    2. Capital Crowding-In: Public capital reduces early-stage risk, enabling private investment participation.
    3. Policy Signalling: Demonstrates long-term state commitment to entrepreneurship.

    Why is deep tech now a strategic priority?

    1. FoF 2.0 Corpus: ₹10,000 crore approved in April 2025, with targeted deployment.
    2. Sectoral Focus: Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Quantum Technologies, Defence, Aerospace.
    3. Gestation Support: Addresses long proof-of-concept cycles and capital intensity in frontier technologies.
    4. Strategic Autonomy: Aligns startup policy with national security and technological self-reliance goals.

    Conclusion:

    A decade of Startup India demonstrates a decisive shift in India’s growth strategy from capital-scarce, risk-averse entrepreneurship to a scale-oriented, innovation-driven ecosystem. The record surge in startups, expansion of unicorns, and targeted deep-tech financing indicate that startups are increasingly complementing MSMEs and manufacturing, strengthening employment creation, capital formation, and India’s long-term economic resilience.

    Value Addition

    Startup India Mission

    1. Launch Year: 2016
    2. Nodal Ministry: Ministry of Commerce and Industry (DPIIT)
    3. Core Objective: Enables innovation-led entrepreneurship through regulatory easing, funding access, and ecosystem support.
    4. Policy Significance: Shifts India’s growth model from job-seeking to job-creating; strengthens formalisation and innovation capacity.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2023] Faster economic growth requires increased share of the manufacturing sector in GDP, particularly of MSMEs. Comment on the present policies of the Government in this regard. 

    Linkage: This question directly links to GS III (Economic Growth, Industrial Policy, MSMEs) by examining manufacturing-led growth as a driver of jobs and productivity. Government initiatives like Startup India, PLI schemes, and Fund of Funds strengthen MSME manufacturing, capital access, and scale-up, addressing this requirement.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • Climate Change Impact on India and World – International Reports, Key Observations, etc.

    Global Risks Report 2026 

    Prelims Only | International Relations | Mains Paper 2: Bilateral, Regional and Global Groupings and agreements involving India

    Why in the News?

    The World Economic Forum released the Global Risks Report 2026, based on the Global Risks Perception Survey of over 1300 global experts, highlighting geoeconomic confrontation as the most severe near term global risk.

    About the Report

    • 21st edition of the Global Risks Report
    • Analyses risks across three time horizons
      • Immediate term: 2026
      • Short to medium term: up to 2028
      • Long term: up to 2036
    • Survey respondents from academia, business, government, international organisations and civil society
    • Released ahead of the annual WEF meeting in Davos

    Top Risks in 2026

    • Geoeconomic confrontation ranked number one
      • Use of tariffs, sanctions, investment restrictions and control over critical minerals
    • Followed by State based armed conflict
    • Reflects retreat from multilateral cooperation and rise of economic weaponisation

    Economic Risks Trend

    • Economic risks show the sharpest rise in rankings
    • Economic downturn up to rank 11
    • Inflation rose to rank 21
    • Asset bubble burst moved to rank 18
    • Driven by debt stress, financial fragility and geopolitical rivalry

    Technological Risks

    • Misinformation and disinformation ranked 2nd in short term
    • Cyber insecurity ranked 6th in short term
    • Adverse outcomes of AI technologies
      • Rank 30 in 2 year outlook
      • Rank 5 in 10 year outlook
    • Concerns include job disruption, social harm, mental health impacts and military use of AI

    Societal Risks

    • Rising political and social polarisation
    • Weakening trust in institutions
    • Inequality identified as the most interconnected global risk for second consecutive year
    • Growth of street versus elite narratives challenging democratic resilience

    Environmental Risks

    • Short term deprioritisation
      • Extreme weather fell from rank 2 to 4
      • Pollution dropped from rank 6 to 9
      • Biodiversity loss and earth system change declined sharply
    • Long term dominance
      • Environmental risks occupy half of top 10 risks
      • Extreme weather ranked as the top long term risk
    • Environmental category viewed with highest pessimism over 10 year horizon

    Global Order Transition

    • Movement toward a multipolar and fragmented world
    • 68 percent respondents expect a contested multipolar order over next decade
    • Only 6 percent expect revival of a unipolar rules based system
    • Institutions rooted in Bretton Woods Conference under strain
    [2019] The Global Competitiveness Report is published by the: 

    (a) International Monetary Fund 

    (b) United Nations Conference on Trade and Development 

    (c) World Economic Forum 

    (d) World Bank

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • Industrial Sector Updates – Industrial Policy, Ease of Doing Business, etc.

    NITI Aayog Report on MSME Scheme Convergence 

    Schemes | Economics | Mains Paper 3: Effects Of Liberalization On The Economy, Changes In Industrial Policy and their effects on Industrial Growth

    Why in the News?

    In January 2026, NITI Aayog released a report proposing convergence of MSME schemes to reduce duplication, improve efficiency and strengthen last mile delivery.

    About the Report

    • Title: Achieving Efficiencies in MSME Sector through Convergence of Schemes
    • Prepared by Administrative Staff College of India
    • Analyses 18 centrally administered MSME schemes
    • Recommends information convergence and process convergence
    • Focus on better coordination, outcomes and resource utilisation

    Key Facts about MSME Sector

    • GDP contribution about 29 to 30 percent
    • Employment over 28.7 crore, second only to agriculture
    • Share in exports about 45 to 46 percent
    • Total MSMEs more than 6.3 crore
    • Around 51 percent located in rural areas
    • Government MSME budget increased sharply from 2019–20 to 2023–24, raising efficiency concerns

    Why Convergence is Needed

    • Multiple schemes with overlapping objectives
    • Fragmented implementation across ministries
    • High compliance burden for MSMEs
    • Duplication of resources and limited outreach
    • Weak translation of spending into outcomes

    Framework for Convergence

    1. Information Convergence
    • Integration of central and state government data
    • Enables evidence based policymaking
    • Improves coordination and governance
    1. Process Convergence
    • Alignment and rationalisation of schemes
    • Merging similar components
    • Collaboration across ministries and states
    • Creation of a unified MSME support ecosystem
    [2023] With reference to India, consider the following statements: 

    1. According to the ‘Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development (MSMED) Act, 2006’, the ‘medium enterprises’ are those with investments in plant and machinery between Rs. 15 crore and Rs. 25 crore

    2. All bank loans to the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises qualify under the priority sector. 

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct? 

    (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • Artificial Intelligence (AI) Breakthrough

    Project Suncatcher

    Prelims Only | Science Tech | Mains Paper 3: Achievements Of Indians In S&T,Awareness in various sc and tech fields

    Why in the News?

    Google Research unveiled Project Suncatcher, a research initiative exploring AI datacentres in low Earth orbit powered entirely by solar energy, aimed at addressing the rapidly rising electricity demand of advanced AI systems.

    What is Project Suncatcher

    • A concept and research programme
    • Proposes placing AI datacentres in Low Earth Orbit
    • Datacentres operate continuously on solar power
    • Designed to handle energy intensive AI workloads
    • Developed under Google Research

    Objectives

    • Reduce the energy footprint of AI
    • Enable round the clock clean solar power
    • Decouple AI compute growth from
      • Terrestrial power grids
      • Land constraints
      • Water intensive cooling systems
    • Support long term scalability of AI infrastructure

    Prelims Pointers

    • Orbit used: Low Earth Orbit
    • Power source: Solar energy only
    • Developed by: Google Research
    • Key orbit type: Sun synchronous orbit
    • Core challenge addressed: AI energy demand
    • Emphasis on inter satellite communication over Earth links
    [2020] With the present state of development, Artificial Intelligence can effectively do which of the following? 

    1. Bring down electricity consumption in industrial units 

    2. Create meaningful short stories and songs 

    3. Disease diagnosis 

    4. Text-to-Speech Conversion 

    5. Wireless transmission of electrical energy 

    Select the correct answer using the code given below: 

    (a) 1, 2, 3 and 5 only (b) 1, 3 and 4 only (c) 2, 4 and 5 only (d) 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • Electoral Reforms In India

    Indelible Ink 

    Prelims Only | Science Tech | Mains Paper 3: Awareness in various sc and tech fields

    Why in the News?

    During municipal corporation elections in Maharashtra, Opposition parties alleged that the indelible ink mark on voters’ fingers was easily removable, raising concerns over possible electoral malpractice. The issue gained traction after videos showed ink marks fading when marker pens were used.

    What is Indelible Ink

    • Applied on a voter’s finger after casting the vote
    • Ensures one person votes only once
    • Designed to remain visible for several days
    • Removal is possible only as the outer skin layer sheds

    When did India start using it

    • Introduced in 1962
    • Used for the first time in India’s third General Election
    • Decision taken by Election Commission of India
    • Has been in continuous use since then

    Who Manufactures the Ink

    • Manufactured exclusively by Mysore Paints and Varnish Limited
    • Karnataka government undertaking
    • Supplies ink under contract with
      • Election Commission of India
      • Union Ministry of Law and Justice

    Note: Exported to countries like Afghanistan, Cambodia, Kenya, Mongolia, Nepal and Nigeria.

    Prelims Pointers

    • Indelible ink introduced in 1962
    • Key chemical silver nitrate
    • Developed by National Physical Laboratory
    • Manufactured by Mysore Paints and Varnish Limited
    • Ink visibility on nail can last up to four weeks
    • Marker pens allowed in local body elections since 2011
    [2017] Consider the following statements: 

    1. The Election Commission of India is a five-member body

    2. Union Ministry of Home Affairs decides the election schedule for the conduct of both general elections and bye-elections

    3. Election Commission resolves the disputes relating to splits/mergers of recognized political parties

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct? 

    (a) 1 and 2 only (b) 2 only (c) 2 and 3 only (d) 3 only

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • Festivals, Dances, Theatre, Literature, Art in News

    Thiruvalluvar Day 

    Prelims Only | Art and Culture | Mains Paper 1: Arts & Culture

    Why in the News?

    On Thiruvalluvar Day, Prime Minister Narendra Modi paid homage to Thiruvalluvar, highlighting the timeless relevance of his ideals and urging people to read the Tirukkural.

    About Thiruvalluvar

    • Celebrated Tamil poet philosopher of the Sangam age
    • Believed to have lived around 2000 years ago
    • Associated with Mylapore in present day Chennai
    • Also known as Valluvar
    • Revered as a saint across South India
    • In some traditions regarded as an incarnation of Brahma

    Social and Religious Context

    • Lived during a period when Hinduism, Jainism, and Buddhism coexisted
    • Scholars associate him with Jainism or Hinduism
    • Demonstrated that householder life can lead to spiritual excellence
    • Rejected the necessity of renunciation for moral and spiritual attainment

    Prelims Pointers

    • Tirukkural has 1330 couplets
    • Official birth year recognised as 31 BCE
    • Associated with Sangam literature
    • Emphasised ethics, governance, and social harmony
    • Revered across religious traditions
    [2020] Which one of the following statements about Sangam literature in ancient South India is correct? 

    (a) Sangam poems are devoid of any reference to material culture

    (b) The social classification of Varna was known to Sangam poets

    (c) Sangam poems have no reference to warrior ethic

    (d) Sangam literature refers to magical forces as irrational

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

Join the Community

Join us across Social Media platforms.