💥UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (June Batch) + Access XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Archives: News

  • Foreign Policy Watch: India-United States

    The importance of Pax Silica for India

    Explained | International Relations | Mains Paper 2: Bilateral, Regional and Global Groupings and agreements involving India

    Why in the News?

    In December 2025, the U.S. convened the first Pax Silica Summit to secure supply chains for critical minerals, semiconductors, and AI, moving away from China-centric globalisation. The initiative responds to China’s use of rare earths and technology inputs as strategic leverage. For India, it opens the possibility of becoming a trusted supply-chain partner, though capacity constraints remain.

    What is Pax Silica and why has it emerged now?

    Pax Silica is the U.S. Department of State’s flagship effort on AI and supply chain security, advancing new economic security consensus among allies and trusted partners.

    1. Strategic Framework: Integrates critical minerals, semiconductor manufacturing, AI infrastructure, and logistics into a trusted supply-chain network.
    2. Geopolitical Context: Responds to China’s dominance in rare earths and chip manufacturing inputs, and its ability to influence global flows.
    3. Supply-Chain Shock Lessons: Incorporates lessons from COVID-19 and trade disruptions that exposed vulnerabilities in concentrated production systems.
    4. Normative Shift: Moves away from efficiency-based globalisation towards resilience, trust, and political alignment.

    How does Pax Silica seek to restructure global technology supply chains?

    1. Coercive Dependency Reduction: Limits over-reliance on single-country control of critical minerals and manufacturing stages.
    2. Integrated Value Chains: Connects mining, processing, fabrication, logistics, and AI deployment across aligned economies.
    3. Trusted Digital Infrastructure: Promotes secure, interoperable systems for AI and data-intensive technologies.
    4. Selective Coalition Model: Operates through functional partnerships rather than universal multilateral institutions.

    Who are the key participants and what capabilities do they bring?

    1. United States: Anchors advanced semiconductor design, AI platforms, and strategic coordination.
    2. Japan: Contributes precision manufacturing, materials engineering, and chip equipment expertise.
    3. Australia: Supplies lithium and other critical minerals essential for batteries and advanced electronics.
    4. Netherlands: Hosts ASML, a global leader in advanced semiconductor lithography.
    5. South Korea: Provides manufacturing strength in memory chips and advanced fabrication.
    6. Israel: Leads in AI software, defence technologies, and cybersecurity.
    7. United Kingdom: Houses the world’s third-largest AI market and innovation ecosystem.
    8. Middle East Funds: Enable capital deployment through Qatar and UAE sovereign investment vehicles.
    9. Observer Economies: OECD and Taiwan participate without full membership, indicating graded engagement.

    Why is China central to the Pax Silica calculus?

    1. Rare Earth Dominance: Controls a significant share of global REE processing and magnet manufacturing.
    2. Export Controls: Uses trade restrictions as a strategic tool, impacting electronics and automotive industries.
    3. Manufacturing Centrality: Retains scale advantages in downstream electronics assembly.
    4. Strategic Leverage: Demonstrates capacity to weaponise supply chains during political disputes.

    What is India’s current position in the Pax Silica ecosystem?

    1. Digital Infrastructure Strength: Possesses large-scale digital public infrastructure and a growing AI market.
    2. Semiconductor Constraints: Lacks mature fabrication capacity and advanced chip manufacturing ecosystems.
    3. Human Capital Advantage: Hosts a large pool of engineers and returning AI researchers trained abroad.
    4. Policy Initiatives: Has launched semiconductor and AI missions with participation from domestic conglomerates.
    5. Collaborative Links: Engages with Israeli firms for chip fabrication plants and U.S. firms like Micron for assembly and testing.

    What challenges does India face in joining Pax Silica?

    1. Capability Gap: Risks being perceived primarily as a market rather than a technology contributor.
    2. Expectation Management: Faces a “participation gap” between allied expectations and domestic capacities.
    3. Policy Autonomy: Must balance strategic alignment with flexibility in industrial and trade policy.
    4. Regulatory Exposure: May face pressure to adjust export controls, subsidies, and government procurement norms.
    5. Asymmetric Benefits: Risks uneven gains if domestic ecosystem development lags behind integration.

    Conclusion

    Pax Silica reflects the consolidation of technology, security, and geopolitics into a single policy domain. For India, participation offers an opportunity to embed itself in trusted global supply chains, but only if accompanied by accelerated domestic capacity-building. Strategic engagement must prioritise ecosystem development, policy autonomy, and long-term technological self-reliance rather than symbolic alignment.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2024] “The West is fostering India as an alternative to reduce dependence on China’s supply chain and as a strategic ally to counter China’s political and economic dominance.” Explain this statement with examples.

    Linkage: The West is promoting India to diversify supply chains away from China, particularly in semiconductors and critical technologies. This also positions India as a strategic partner to counter China’s growing political and economic influence.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • International Space Agencies – Missions and Discoveries

    How reusability can lead to sustainable, cost effective access to space

    Explained | Science Tech | Mains Paper 3: Achievements Of Indians In S&T,Awareness in various sc and tech fields

    Why in the News

    Reusable rocket technology has shifted space activities from government-controlled, single-use rockets to a commercial, reuse-based model. Private companies, especially SpaceX, have repeatedly recovered and reused rocket stages, cutting launch costs by nearly five times and allowing more frequent launches. With the global space economy expected to cross USD 1 trillion by 2030, reusability marks a fundamental break from earlier disposable launch systems that dominated for decades.

    Reusable rocket

    1. It is a spacecraft designed to launch, land, and be refurbished for multiple flights.
    2. It drastically cuts space access costs by reusing expensive components like the booster, with SpaceX’s Falcon 9 leading the way.
    3. How They Work (Key Technologies)
      1. Vertical Takeoff & Landing (VTVL): Rockets launch vertically and use engines, grid fins (like on Falcon 9), and landing legs for controlled descent and landing back on Earth.
      2. Advanced Software: Sophisticated flight computers and software manage complex maneuvers like boost-back burns, re-entry burns, and final landing.
      3. Fuel Reserve: Reusable rockets carry extra fuel to perform landing burns, making them heavier but efficient.
      4. Refurbishment: After landing, components are inspected, refurbished, and prepared for the next flight, reducing the need to build new rockets.

    How does rocket fuel mass constrain space launches?

    1. Rocket Equation Constraint: Demonstrates that most launch mass consists of fuel, leaving less than 3-4% for payload in conventional designs.
    2. Propellant Dominance: Requires carrying fuel to lift fuel, creating diminishing returns for payload capacity.
    3. Cost Implication: Increases launch expenses as entire systems are discarded after one mission.

    Why are rockets designed with multiple stages?

    1. Stage Separation: Allows discarding empty tanks and engines to reduce mass during ascent.
    2. Efficiency Gain: Improves thrust-to-weight ratio as the vehicle ascends.
    3. Conventional Limitation: Most stages are used once and destroyed, increasing per-launch costs.

    How has reusability altered rocket engineering economics?

    1. Stage Recovery: Enables retrieval of high-value components such as engines and avionics.
    2. Manufacturing Shift: Reduces dependence on repeated fabrication of complex propulsion systems.
    3. Launch Frequency: Supports rapid turnaround and higher mission cadence.

    What operational innovations enable reusable launch systems?

    1. Precision Landing: Uses autonomous guidance, grid fins, and controlled burns for vertical recovery.
    2. Thermal and Structural Design: Ensures engines and stages withstand re-entry heat and stress.
    3. Refurbishment Protocols: Introduces inspection, testing, and component replacement cycles.

    Can a recovered rocket stage be reused multiple times?

    1. Reuse Cycles: First stages of Falcon-9 rockets have been reused over 30 times.
    2. Economic Threshold: Savings from reuse outweigh refurbishment and inspection costs.
    3. Reliability Assurance: Requires rigorous testing to maintain safety and mission assurance.

    How does reusability improve sustainability in space operations?

    1. Material Efficiency: Reduces consumption of metals, composites, and rare components.
    2. Debris Reduction: Limits discarded stages that contribute to space and ocean debris.
    3. Environmental Impact: Lowers lifecycle emissions by minimizing repeated manufacturing.

    What are the limitations of reusable rocket technology?

    1. Engineering Trade-offs: Recovery systems add mass, reducing payload capacity.
    2. Thermal Stress: Engines face extreme heat cycles during re-entry and relaunch.
    3. Economic Ceiling: Excessive inspection or refurbishment can negate cost benefits.

    Where does India stand in reusable launch vehicle development?

    1. ISRO Initiatives: Working on reusable launch vehicles (RLVs), winged spaceplane concepts, and vertical landing experiments.
    2. Two-Stage Focus: Aims to achieve orbital missions with fewer stages through high-efficiency propulsion.
    3. Private Sector Entry: Indian startups are exploring recovery-based launch solutions.
    4. Future Direction: Emphasis on recovery, reuse, and refurbishment for competitive access to space.

    Conclusion

    Reusable launch systems redefine space access by replacing disposable rockets with recoverable transportation platforms. By lowering costs, increasing mission frequency, and reducing material waste, reusability strengthens both economic viability and sustainability of space operations. For India, adopting reusability is essential to remain competitive in a rapidly commercialising global space economy.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2016] Discuss India’s achievements in the field of Space Science and Technology. How has the application of this technology helped India in its socio-economic development?

    Linkage: India’s achievements in space technology, low-cost launch systems, planetary missions, and indigenous satellites, demonstrate technological self-reliance and innovation. Their application has directly supported socio-economic development through communication, disaster management, navigation, weather forecasting, and governance efficiency (GS III: Space Technology & Development).

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • Modern Indian History-Events and Personalities

    PM Modi highlights Parbati Giri’s contribution to freedom struggle

    Prelims Only | History | Mains Paper 1: Modern Indian History

    Why in the news

    Prime Minister Narendra Modi paid tribute to Parbati Giri on her birth centenary, highlighting her role in India’s freedom movement and post independence social service. She was also remembered earlier in Mann Ki Baat.

    Who was Parbati Giri

    • Freedom fighter from Odisha
    • Known as “Mother Teresa of Western Odisha”
    • Actively participated in the Quit India Movement
    • Joined the freedom struggle at just 16 years of age

    Role in freedom struggle

    • Took part in the Quit India Movement of 1942
    • Represented the contribution of women and tribal regions in the national movement
    • Part of the broader mass based resistance against colonial rule

    Post-independence contributions

    • Dedicated her life to social service
    • Worked extensively for Tribal welfare, Healthcare and Women empowerment
    • Established orphanages and welfare institutions
    • Focused on upliftment of the poor and marginalised

    UPSC Prelims pointers

    • Parbati Giri was associated with Quit India Movement
    • Belonged to Odisha
    • Known for lifelong tribal and social welfare work
    • Frequently cited in context of unsung freedom fighters
    [2011] Which one of the following observations is not true about the Quit India Movement of 1942? 

    (a) It was a non-violent movement 

    (b) It was led by Mahatma Gandhi 

    (c) It was a spontaneous movement 

    (d) It did not attract the labour class in general

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • Climate Change Impact on India and World – International Reports, Key Observations, etc.

    India expands GHG emission intensity regime to four more sectors

    Prelims Only | Enviro & Biodiversity | Mains Paper 3: Conservation, Environmental Pollution & Degradation, Eia

    Why in the news

    • The Union Government has expanded the Greenhouse Gas Emission Intensity reduction regime to four additional industrial sectors under amended rules notified by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change.
    • The move operationalises India’s Carbon Credit Trading framework and strengthens compliance based climate mitigation.

    Newly included sectors

    • Petroleum refineries, Petrochemicals, Textiles, andSecondary aluminium
    • These are in addition to aluminium, cement, chlor alkali and pulp and paper sectors notified earlier.

    Coverage

    • 208 industrial units across India
      • 173 textile units
      • 21 petroleum refineries
      • 11 petrochemical units
      • 3 secondary aluminium units
    • Major public sector and private companies covered include
      • ONGC, Indian Oil, Bharat Petroleum, Hindustan Petroleum, Numaligarh Refinery and Reliance Industries.

    Legal and policy framework

    • Notified as Greenhouse Gases Emission Intensity Target Amendment Rules
    • Issued under the compliance mechanism of the Carbon Credit Trading Scheme, 2023
    • Enforced by the Central Pollution Control Board

    What is GEI (Greenhouse Gas Emission Intensity) target?

    • Mandatory reduction of GHG emissions per unit of output
    • Baseline year is 2023 to 24
    • Targets apply from 2025 to 26
    • Overall reduction of 3 to 7 percent by 2026 to 27

    Compliance and penalty

    • Units must either
      • Meet GEI targets
      • Or submit carbon credit certificates equal to the shortfall
    • Non compliance penalty
      • Imposed as environmental compensation by CPCB
      • Amount equals twice the average carbon credit price in that trading cycle
      • Payable within 90 days

    Climate significance

    • Aligns with India’s net zero target of 2070
    • Supports India’s Nationally Determined Contribution under the Paris Agreement
    • Promotes market driven decarbonisation instead of criminal penalties
    • Pushes energy efficiency and cleaner technologies in high emission sectors

    UPSC Prelims pointers

    • GEI focuses on emission intensity, not absolute emissions
    • Linked to Carbon Credit Trading Scheme 2023
    • Penalty equals 2 times average carbon credit price
    • Enforcement by CPCB
    • Supports India’s net zero 2070 pathway
    [2011] Regarding “carbon credits”, which one of the following statements is not correct? 

    (a) The carbon credit system was ratified in conjunction with the Kyoto Protocol

    (b) Carbon credits are awarded to countries or groups that have reduced greenhouse gases below their emission quota

    (c) The goal of the carbon credit system is to limit the increase of carbon dioxide emission

    (d) Carbon credits are traded at a price fixed from time to time by the United Nations environment programs

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • New Species of Plants and Animals Discovered

    BNHS and NMCG launch project to protect Indian Skimmer

    Prelims Only | Enviro & Biodiversity | Mains Paper 3: Conservation, Environmental Pollution & Degradation, Eia

    Why in the news

    Bombay Natural History Society and National Mission for Clean Ganga have launched a new conservation project in Dehradun to protect the endangered Indian Skimmer in the Ganga Basin. The project was inaugurated by the Union Minister for Jal Shakti C R Patil.

    About Indian Skimmer

    • Scientific name: Rynchops albicollis
    • IUCN status: Endangered
    • Habitat: Large rivers, estuaries, sandbars and islands
    • India hosts around 90 percent of the global population, making conservation nationally critical.

    Core objective

    • Protection of river sandbars, which are crucial nesting and breeding habitats for Indian Skimmer and other riverine birds.

    Major threats addressed

    • Sand mining on riverbeds
    • Altered river flows and sudden water releases from dams
    • Human and livestock disturbance
    • Predation and habitat fragmentation

    Geographical coverage

    • National Chambal Sanctuary
    • Upper Ganga near Bijnor and Narora
    • Ganga Yamuna confluence at Prayagraj
    • Lower Ganga near the Vikramshila Gangetic Dolphin Sanctuary in Bihar

    UPSC Prelims pointers

    • Indian Skimmer nests on exposed river sandbars.
    • India holds the largest global population share of the species.
    • Project combines science, community participation, and river planning.
    • Linked with Namami Gange ecosystem restoration goals.
    [2014] With reference to Bombay Natural History Society (BNHS), consider the following statements: 1. It is an autonomous organization under the Ministry of Environment and Forests

    2. It strives to conserve nature through action-based research, education and public awareness

    3. It organizes and conducts nature trails and camps for the general public

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct? 

    (a) 1 and 3 only (b) 2 only (c) 2 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3 only

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • Climate Change Impact on India and World – International Reports, Key Observations, etc.

    Environmental (Protection) Fund

    Prelims Only | Enviro & Biodiversity | Mains Paper 3: Conservation, Environmental Pollution & Degradation, Eia

    Why in the news

    The Union Government notified detailed rules in January 2026 to operationalise the Environmental (Protection) Fund, a reform enabled by the Jan Vishwas Act, 2023.

    About

    • A statutory fund of the Government of India created to channel environmental penalties into pollution control, restoration, monitoring, research, and capacity building.
    • Converts monetary penalties into direct environmental remediation.

    Legal basis

    • Provided under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.
    • Detailed rules notified in January 2026.
    • Strengthened by the Jan Vishwas Act, 2023, which decriminalised several environmental offences while retaining penalties.

    Nodal authority

    • Administered by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change or any body notified by the Central Government.

    Aim

    • Ensure that pollution penalties are recycled for environmental protection, remediation, clean technology promotion, and stronger regulatory institutions.

    Key features

    • Sources of funds
      • Penalties under the Air Act 1981 and Environment Act 1986
      • Interest from investments
      • Other prescribed sources
    • Permitted uses (11 activities)
      • Pollution prevention and mitigation
      • Remediation of contaminated sites
      • Environmental monitoring equipment
      • Clean technology research
      • IT enabled regulatory systems
      • Laboratory infrastructure
      • Capacity building of regulatory bodies
    • Revenue sharing
      • 75% of penalty proceeds to the Consolidated Fund of the State or UT
      • 25% retained by the Centre
    • Governance: Dedicated Project Management Units at Central and State levels
    • Oversight and transparency
      • Audit by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India
      • Centralised online portal developed by the Central Pollution Control Board
    [2019] Consider the following statements: The Environment Protection Act, 1986 empowers the Government of India to: 

    1. State the requirement of public participation in the process of environmental protection, and the procedure and manner in which it is sought

    2. Lay down the standards for emission or discharge of environmental pollutants from various sources

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct? 

    (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • BRICS Summits

    RBI proposes CBDC linkage on BRICS agenda

    Prelims Only | International Relations | Mains Paper 2: Bilateral, Regional and Global Groupings and agreements involving India

    Why in the news?

    Reserve Bank of India has advised the Government of India to place a proposal on linking Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) on the agenda of the BRICS 2026 Summit, which India will host.

    Key proposal

    • Link BRICS members’ CBDCs including India’s e-rupee for cross border trade finance and tourism payments.
    • Aim is faster settlements, lower transaction costs and reduced dependence on correspondent banking systems.
    • RBI clarifies this is not a formal de dollarisation push, but about efficiency and resilience.

    Background context

    • Builds on the 2025 BRICS Rio Declaration that called for interoperability of payment systems.
    • All core BRICS members Brazil Russia India China South Africa are running CBDC pilot projects, none fully launched yet.

    Central Bank Digital Currencies Vs Cryptocurrency

    • Issuing authority

        • CBDCs are issued and regulated by a country’s central bank such as the Reserve Bank of India
        • Cryptocurrencies are issued privately through decentralised blockchain networks with no sovereign authority, for example Bitcoin

    • Legal status

      • CBDCs are legal tender and must be accepted for payments within the issuing country
      • Cryptocurrencies are not legal tender in most countries and their legal status varies

    Strategic significance

    • Could challenge dollar centric payment rails indirectly amid rising geopolitical tensions.
    • Enhances international use of the rupee through regulated digital channels.
    • Fits India’s push for safe sovereign digital money over private stablecoins.

    Prelims pointers

    • CBDC is sovereign digital legal tender issued by a central bank.
    • RBI views CBDCs as less risky than stablecoins for monetary and financial stability.
    • BRICS was founded in 2009 and later expanded beyond the original five members.
    [2024] Consider the following statements in respect of the digital rupee: 

    1. It is a sovereign currency issued by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) in alignment with its monetary policy

    2. It appears as a liability on the RBI’s balance sheet

    3. It is insured against inflation by its very design

    4. It is freely convertible against commercial bank money and cash

    Which of the statements given above are correct? 

    (a) 1 and 2 only (b) 1 and 3 only (c) 2 and 4 only (d) 1, 2 and 4

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • Foreign Policy Watch: Indo-Pacific and QUAD

    [20th January 2026] The Hindu OpED: In a changing world, it is ‘small tables, big dividends’

    op-ed snap | International Relations | Mains Paper 2: Bilateral, Regional and Global Groupings and agreements involving India

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2020] “Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad) is transforming itself into a trade bloc from a military alliance, in present times.” Discuss.

    Linkage: The Quad, EU engagement, and BRICS together show India’s shift towards selective, issue-based “small tables” instead of relying on one universal platform. The article argues that delivery and flexibility, not bloc size, now define diplomatic relevance.

    Mentor’s Comment

    In a fragmented global order where multilateral institutions are losing effectiveness and leadership is contested, India’s diplomacy is changing in a fundamental way. The article explains why issue-based, small groupings are delivering better results than large universal forums, and why 2026 marks a turning point in India’s foreign policy approach.

    Why in the News

    India’s diplomacy in 2026 has gained attention as it engages with several small groupings, such as BRICS, the Quad, G20 follow-ups, and Europe, rather than depending on one large multilateral platform. This marks a clear break from the past, when global governance relied on large institutions with clear leaders. Today, no single power can lead across all areas, forcing countries to work through selective groupings. The importance lies in India’s ability to secure practical outcomes, such as finance, technology, crisis response, and rule-making, despite a divided global order. Since these problems are global and long-term, the shift reflects a structural change, not a short-term adjustment.

    Why has global diplomacy moved away from large multilateral platforms?

    1. Fragmented power structure: Prevents any single country from credibly setting agendas across trade, security, finance, and technology.
    2. Overcrowded institutions: Limits decisiveness and accountability in global problem-solving.
    3. Legitimacy-capacity mismatch: Expands participation without corresponding enforcement or delivery mechanisms.

    How does Europe test India’s diplomatic adaptability?

    1. Collective engagement logic: Requires dealing with the EU as a bloc rather than bilateral capitals.
    2. Regulatory centrality: Positions Europe as a rule-maker in trade, climate, competition, and sustainability.
    3. Economic rebalancing: Provides India diversification away from China-centric supply chains.
    4. Risk insulation: Reduces exposure to United States trade unpredictability through deeper institutional ties.

    What structural contradictions limit BRICS effectiveness?

    1. Political divergence: Prevents consensus on strategic direction.
    2. Economic asymmetry: Limits collective leverage.
    3. China-centric drift: Raises concerns of agenda capture.
    4. Institutional contestation: Weakens credibility of alternatives like the New Development Bank.
    5. Outcome uncertainty: Reduces BRICS to a forum without clear delivery benchmarks.

    Why is the Quad a functional platform despite limited membership?

    1. Operational focus: Enables crisis response and maritime coordination.
    2. Public goods delivery: Supports disaster relief and regional capacity-building.
    3. Flexible architecture: Avoids rigid alliance commitments while enabling cooperation.
    4. Security-development balance: Combines deterrence with infrastructure and connectivity roles.

    How does the G20 illustrate limits of large tables?

    1. Theoretical inclusiveness: Positions itself as the premier economic coordination forum.
    2. Practical inertia: Fails to translate consensus into sustained action.
    3. Agenda dilution: Expands scope without strengthening enforcement.
    4. Continuity gap: Depends heavily on host-country momentum.

    What strategic message does 2026 send for India’s diplomacy?

    1. Selective multilateralism: Prioritises effectiveness over representativeness.
    2. Bridge-building role: Positions India as an intermediary across divided blocs.
    3. Issue-based leadership: Focuses on technology, supply chains, development finance, and crisis response.
    4. Choice architecture: Recognises that strategic autonomy now lies in table selection, not table size.

    Conclusion

    In an era of fragmented power and weakening multilateral institutions, India’s diplomatic effectiveness will depend on choosing the right platforms rather than occupying every forum. By prioritising issue-based, limited-member groupings, India is adapting to structural changes in global governance and positioning itself to secure concrete outcomes in a complex international order.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • Ocean Governance – UNCLOS, ISA, High Seas Teaty, etc.

    India to initiate domestic framework for ratifying High Seas Treaty

    Explained | International Relations | Mains Paper 2: Bilateral, Regional and Global Groupings and agreements involving India

    Why in the News

    The Agreement under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Diversity of Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ Agreement) under United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea enters into force on January 17, 2026, enabling, for the first time, the creation of marine protected areas in international waters. This reverses decades of regulatory vacuum over the high seas, which constitute two-thirds of ocean area with less than 10% protected. India has begun shaping a domestic implementation framework, highlighting the Treaty’s scale, timing, and implications for fisheries, marine genetics, and ocean governance.

    The High Seas Treaty

    1. It is a landmark global accord to protect marine life in the high seas and the deep seabed (the areas of the ocean that lie beyond any country’s national jurisdiction).
    2. It applies to over two thirds of the world’s ocean. 
    3. It provides a legal framework to 
      1. conserve marine biodiversity
      2. promote sustainable use of ocean resources 
      3. ensure fair sharing of benefits from marine genetic materials found in deep-sea species.
    4. The treaty is built around four key pillars:
      1. Marine genetic resources and benefit-sharing, ensuring discoveries from marine organisms benefit all humanity.
      2. Area-based management tools, enabling the creation of marine protected areas (MPAs) in international waters.
      3. Environmental impact assessments which require countries to evaluate how proposed activities could affect fragile marine ecosystems.
      4. Capacity-building and technology transfer, helping developing countries participate fully in ocean research and conservation. 

    What makes the High Seas Treaty a landmark in ocean governance?

    1. First-time Legal Protection: Enables designation of environmentally protected zones in international waters.
    2. Governance Closure: Addresses long-standing regulatory gaps over marine genetic resources, environmental impact assessments, and conservation measures.
    3. Global Scale: Applies to waters covering nearly two thirds of the world’s ocean. (high seas + deep seabed).

    Why is the Treaty’s timing significant?

    1. Countdown Trigger: Morocco’s ratification (September) activated a 120-day countdown to entry into force.
    2. Policy Context: Aligns with the 2022 UN biodiversity goal to protect 30% of land and oceans by 2030.
    3. Industry Interface: Comes as applications for deep-sea exploration are under review (with seabed mining governed separately).

    How is India preparing for ratification and implementation?

    1. Institutional Coordination: Ministry of Earth Sciences convened a national consultation with ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute and Centre for Marine Living Resources and Ecology.
    2. Stakeholder Integration: Policymakers, legal experts, scientists, fisheries and maritime industry assessed scientific, legal, and institutional readiness.
    3. Roadmap Formation: Recommendations to inform India’s domestic roadmap ahead of the Conference of Parties (August 2026).

    What governance gaps does the Treaty address?

    1. Marine Genetic Resources: Clarifies ownership sensitivities and equitable access mechanisms.
    2. Environmental Accountability: Establishes structured processes to manage impact assessments and conservation obligations.
    3. Equity and Access: Balances conservation with national interests of coastal and developing states.

    Why does the Treaty matter for India’s fisheries and ocean science?

    1. Ecosystem Connectivity: High seas activities influence fish availability within India’s EEZ, despite reliance on nearshore fisheries.
    2. Scientific Capacity: India’s strengths in ocean science and marine technology position it to integrate science, policy, and law.
    3. Sectoral Relevance: Direct implications for small-scale fisheries, sustainability, and food security.

    What are the limits and enforcement challenges?

    1. Compliance Constraints: Enforcement options in international law remain limited, relying on cooperation among ratifying states.
    2. Participation Gap: Some major players, including the United States, have not ratified, affecting universality.

    Conclusion

    The High Seas Treaty transforms the oceans from a regulatory “wild west” into a governed commons. India’s early domestic alignment signals strategic intent to shape implementation, protect fisheries interests, and integrate science with law, while the Treaty’s success will hinge on cooperation, compliance, and institutional capacity at scale.

    PYQ Relevance 

    [UPSC 2023] The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has predicted a global sea level rise of about one metre by AD 2100. What would be its impact in India and the other countries in the Indian Ocean region? 

    Linkage: UPSC has repeatedly asked questions on international organisations and environmental regimes such as Ramsar Convention, UNFCCC, IPCC, and Sendai Framework, indicating sustained focus on global commons and climate governance. The IPCC’s sea-level rise projections highlight climate stress on oceans, reinforcing the relevance of the High Seas Treaty (BBNJ) in strengthening biodiversity protection and governance beyond national jurisdiction.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

  • Nuclear Energy

    DAE’s nuclear pivot: Light water push to tap global markets, retain heavy water edge

    Explained | Economics | Mains Paper 3: Infrastructure: Energy, Ports, Roads, Airports, Railways Etc.

    Why in the News

    India’s nuclear establishment is prioritising Light Water Reactors (LWRs) for global market integration while retaining Pressurised Heavy Water Reactors (PHWRs) as a domestic and strategic strength. This marks a significant departure from India’s earlier inward-looking PHWR-centric approach. The shift is urgent as Light Water Reactors account for over 85% of global nuclear capacity. India seeks export competitiveness as emerging economies like the UAE, Bangladesh, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey expand nuclear power.

    What is a Light Water Reactor?

    1. A Light Water Reactor (LWR) is a nuclear reactor that uses ordinary water (H₂O) as both the coolant and neutron moderator.
    2. Fuel type: Operates on low-enriched uranium fuel.

    What is a Pressurised Heavy Water Reactor?

    1. Definition: A Pressurised Heavy Water Reactor (PHWR) is a nuclear reactor that uses heavy water (D₂O) as both the coolant and neutron moderator.
    2. Fuel type: Operates on natural uranium, avoiding the need for enrichment.

    Why do Light Water Reactors dominate the global nuclear market?

    1. Global share: LWRs constitute over 85% of installed civil nuclear reactor capacity worldwide.
    2. Design simplicity: Uses normal water as coolant and moderator, reducing engineering complexity.
    3. Cost structure: Lower construction costs due to economies of scale and standardised designs.
    4. Operational efficiency: Higher thermal efficiency compared to heavy water reactors.
    5. Fuel ecosystem: Reliance on enriched uranium, readily accessible in Western markets.

    Why has India relied on PHWRs despite global LWR dominance?

    1. Fuel flexibility: PHWRs operate on natural uranium, reducing enrichment dependence.
    2. Resource alignment: Matches India’s limited uranium and abundant thorium reserves.
    3. Indigenous capability: Strong domestic expertise in design, manufacturing, and operation.
    4. Strategic autonomy: Minimises external fuel supply vulnerabilities.
    5. Limitation: Reduced export competitiveness in markets structured around LWR ecosystems.

    Why is the current LWR push a strategic departure for India?

    1. Export integration: Enables Indian firms to enter the global nuclear supply chain.
    2. Private participation: Supported by legal reforms opening nuclear power to non-state actors.
    3. Project acceleration: DAE fast-tracking the 900 MWe indigenous LWR design, initiated in 2015.
    4. Negotiating leverage: Enhances bargaining capacity with foreign vendors on imports and technology.
    5. Market realism: Aligns reactor strategy with international demand patterns.

    What challenges have exposed the limits of LWR-led imports?

    1. Cost escalation: Higher capital costs translate into elevated electricity tariffs.
    2. Domestic displacement: Risk of sidelining indigenous PHWR manufacturing capacity.
    3. Case study: Jaitapur: Project delays due to tariff concerns, liability issues, and Areva’s financial instability.
    4. Market absorption: Indian electricity markets struggle to absorb high-cost nuclear power.

    How are PHWRs repositioned in India’s nuclear future?

    1. Fuel innovation: PHWRs using thorium and low-enriched uranium lower scale-up constraints.
    2. Export differentiation: Positions PHWRs as a niche solution for resource-constrained economies.
    3. Manufacturing depth: Builds on India’s experience from 220 MWe to 700 MWe PHWR units.
    4. Growth alignment: Supports nuclear expansion without overreliance on imported enrichment services.

    What role do SMRs play in India’s nuclear ambitions?

    1. Capacity range: 30-300 MWe Small Modular Reactors (SMRs).
    2. Cost efficiency: Enables modular, scalable deployment.
    3. Export potential: Enhances attractiveness for emerging economies.
    4. Strategic competition: China pursuing SMR leadership as a Global South diplomatic tool, similar to EV sector disruption.

    Conclusion

    India’s nuclear pivot reflects strategic pragmatism rather than abandonment of legacy strengths. The dual-track approach, global LWR integration combined with PHWR-based differentiation, balances export ambition, energy security, and industrial capability. Success depends on managing costs, protecting indigenous capacity, and converting legislative reform into manufacturing scale.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2018] With growing energy needs should India keep on expanding its nuclear energy programme? Discuss the facts and fears associated with nuclear energy?

    Linkage: The question links directly to India’s energy security and clean baseload power needs, where nuclear energy complements renewables. The current debate on LWR expansion, PHWR indigenisation, high costs, and safety concerns reflects the balance between the facts and fears of nuclear power.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor

Join the Community

Join us across Social Media platforms.