Introduction

India’s STEM ecosystem faces deep-rooted structural constraints even as the government seeks to reform doctoral guidelines and redirect research toward emerging national needs. The debate highlights persistent gaps in funding, fellowships, university governance, research priorities, and industry linkages. 

Why in the news?

The issue is significant because the government has asked ministries and departments to re-examine PhD guidelines and shift focus to topics of national relevance. This action comes at a time when existing systemic problems, like delayed fellowship payments, inadequate stipends, poor institutional support, and the absence of industry linkages, have reached a critical point. Several premier institutions have not paid PhD stipends for months, and research fellowships remain stagnant at ₹8,000 per month since 2012 for many categories, sharply contrasting with inflation and rising living costs. 

Understanding the Roots of India’s STEM Challenges

What structural issues limit India’s STEM potential?

1. Weak Research Relevance: Research funded by government departments often lacks direct relevance to national technological needs, reducing innovation output and long-term applicability.
2. Low Public Visibility: Communication gaps hinder public understanding of how government-funded research benefits society or advances national capability.
3. Fragmented Institutional Support: Government departments and agencies lack coordinated mechanisms for selecting and nurturing PhD candidates working in critical areas like energy storage, sustainable agriculture, health tech, and battery technologies.

Why is applied research struggling in India?

1. Limited Industry Linkages: Applied science breakthroughs, though central to modern technological advances, receive inadequate industry support, reducing opportunities for scale-up.
2. Insufficient Local Innovation Ecosystems: Historical examples like the laser or optical fibre show how long-lag research becomes transformative. India still lacks comparable mechanisms to nurture such deep-tech research.
3. Weak Commercialisation Pathways: The absence of industry-academia collaboration limits the transition from early-stage research to viable technologies.

How do fellowship and salary problems deepen the crisis?

1. Delayed Payments: University-funded PhDs and major fellowships like non-NET scholarships frequently experience months-long delays, affecting basic sustenance and productivity.
2. Inadequate Fellowship Amounts: The ₹8,000 monthly scholarship, unchanged since 2012, remains insufficient even for minimal living costs.
3. Forced Supplementary Work: Students must take up temporary teaching assignments, reducing time available for research.
4. Failed Direct Transfer Models: Attempts to transfer fellowship payments directly from banks collapsed due to payment delays and administrative complexities.

Why is India’s research ecosystem unable to retain talent?

1. Limited Faculty Positions: Funded PhDs are scarce; many bright students cannot find positions due to narrow intake. 
2. Opaque Recruitment Processes: Ad-hoc contractual appointments reduce academic stability and deter long-term research commitment.
3. Weak University Ecosystem: Few Indian universities maintain predictability and transparency in administrative and financial processes.

What non-STEM burdens weaken STEM research?

1. Non-scientific Teaching Loads: PhD programmes require students to teach subjects like psychology, sociology, history, diverting time and focus from scientific inquiry.
2. Administrative Distractions: Non-STEM tasks increase the administrative burden on researchers, affecting scientific productivity.
3. Cultural undervaluation of STEM: Specific social sciences are privileged in university structures, leading to skewed resource allocation.

Conclusion

India’s STEM potential depends on addressing foundational issues, predictable funding, research relevance, ecosystem stability, transparent administration, and meaningful industry linkages. Without systemic reform, higher fellowships alone cannot solve deeper governance failures. Strengthening these roots will determine whether India can build a globally competitive research ecosystem capable of supporting national development.

UPSC Relevance

[UPSC 2024] What is the present world scenario of intellectual property rights with respect to life materials? Although India is second in the world to file patents, still only a few have been commercialised. Explain the reasons behind this less commercialization.

Linkage: This theme links directly to GS-3: Science & Technology, IPR, innovation ecosystem, highlighting gaps between patent filings and commercialization. It is relevant for analysing India’s weak research-to-market pipeline, low industry linkages, funding delays, and systemic failure.

Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your 1: 1 personal mentor for UPSC 2024

Attend Now