Ultimate Assessment Program 2027/28/29 || 1:1 Mentorship Batch Admissions Open
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Search results for: “”

  • Villages without 4G decline 75% in 4 years on BSNL’s saturation project

    Villages without 4G decline 75% in 4 years on BSNL’s saturation project

    Why in the News

    Villages without 4G mobile internet have fallen from 45,180 in 2022 to 11,372, a cut far larger than the 24,680 villages Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL)‘s 4G saturation project set out to cover. Department of Telecommunications (DoT) data obtained under the Right to Information Act, 2005 show the fall, with the remaining gaps concentrated in Scheduled Tribe-dominated villages.

    What is the 4G saturation project, and why does rural 4G matter?

    1. What it is: The 4G saturation project is state-owned BSNL’s drive to bring 4G mobile service to villages that had none. It is like extending a road to every village left off the map.
    2. Mobile as the main route: Additions to wired broadband subscriptions have stagnated for months. That makes mobile broadband the primary means of internet access for Indians.
    3. Urban-rural gap: Cities and towns enjoy extensive high-speed 5G coverage and affordable wired home broadband. Villages have historically lagged far behind in connectivity.
    4. The takeaway: For most rural Indians a 4G signal is the only realistic way online, so every newly covered village narrows the digital divide, the gap between people with and without internet access.

    Who drove the fall beyond BSNL’s target?

    1. Private operators: The fall is larger than the project’s initial target, which shows that private operators also expanded their networks alongside BSNL.
    2. Intra-circle agreements: In 12 or 13 telecom circles (licensed service areas), BSNL added to its own coverage through agreements with Vodafone Idea Ltd. (Vi) within each circle.
    3. Next order: The Union government has sanctioned the next order of 26,000 sites for the project.

    Where do the remaining gaps lie?

    1. Odisha first: Odisha has the most villages without 4G, 1,789. Over 300 of them have no residents.
    2. Arunachal Pradesh second: The northeastern State has 1,518 such villages, roughly a tenth of them uninhabited. Its reduction lagged well behind the national average.
    3. Faster progress: Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Rajasthan and Himachal Pradesh have each cut their number of unconnected villages by well over half.
    4. People left out: An estimated 40 lakh people, roughly 0.25% of India’s population, live in villages without 4G this year. Most of them live in Scheduled Tribe-dominated villages.

    Challenges

    1. Outdated village base: With no nationwide Census since 2011, villages formed since then are missing from population estimates, so the true gap is uncertain.
    2. Conflicting official data: The DoT list includes eight Kerala villages without 4G, but the Communications Ministry’s March parliamentary reply reported none.
    3. Hard terrain: The remaining villages lie largely in hilly, forested and tribal areas, where towers are costly and commercially unattractive for private operators.
    4. Coverage is not access: India is still far from universal smartphone ownership, so a signal alone does not bring people online.

    Way Forward

    1. Reconcile the village list: DoT should match its list with State village records and Parliament replies, and publish the reconciled figures.
    2. Prioritise tribal villages: Direct the newly sanctioned sites first to Scheduled Tribe-dominated villages in Odisha and Arunachal Pradesh.
    3. Wider network sharing: Extend BSNL’s intra-circle agreements with private operators to the remaining circles.
    4. Affordable devices: Pair coverage with low-cost smartphone access and digital literacy drives in newly connected villages.

    Conclusion

    Rural 4G gaps have shrunk faster than BSNL’s own project planned, with private operators filling much of the difference. The rollout of the next tranche of sites and a reconciled village list will show whether the last unconnected tribal pockets come online.

    Key numbers

    1. Arunachal Pradesh reduction: 59%, which is 16 percentage points below the national average.
    2. Scheduled Tribe share: 46% of the population in villages without 4G (villages traceable to the 2011 Census) lives in Scheduled Tribe-dominated villages.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2019] With reference to communication technologies, what is/are the difference / differences between LTE (Long-Term Evolution) and VoLTE (Voice over Long-Term Evolution)? 1. LTE ‘is commonly marketed as 3G and VoLTE is commonly marketed as advanced 3G. 2. LTE is data-only technology and VoLTE is voice-only technology. (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2 ANSWER: (d)”

  • Commercial farming in forest land is not protected in FRA: SC

    Commercial farming in forest land is not protected in FRA: SC

    Why in the News

    Tamil Nadu’s claim of historical silk cotton cultivation inside reserve forests has met the Supreme Court‘s prima facie view, a first view before a final ruling, that commercial crop cultivation is not a right under the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 (FRA). A two-judge Bench recorded this in an order on extensive silk cotton plantations in the reserve forests of the Agasthyamalai Biosphere Reserve.

    Whom does the FRA protect, and what forest right does it give?

    1. What the FRA protects: The FRA protects the rights of forest-dwelling Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers who have lived in forests for generations and depend on them for their livelihood.
    2. Minor forest produce right: Section 3(1)(c) recognises the right to collect, use and dispose of minor forest produce, the non-timber produce of plant origin that occurs naturally in forests.

    What has the Court now held on commercial cultivation in forests?

    1. Commercial cultivators excluded: The Court distinguished these communities from commercial cultivators and plantation owners, whose activity the Act does not protect.
    2. No right to plant: Since the Act recognises no right to cultivate a commercial crop, such cultivation cannot justify occupying or staying on forest land.
    3. State-sponsored crop: The government’s own affidavits show “promotion and sponsored cultivation of silk cotton as a commercial crop”. The Bench held such planned or promoted cultivation inside forests “completely impermissible“.
    4. Against the idea of forest produce: The Court noted that planting a commercial crop on purpose is “totally contrary” to the concept of minor forest produce, which grows naturally in the forest.

    Why does the Agasthyamalai order matter, and what happens next?

    1. Scale of cultivation: Silk cotton covers about 3,638 of the 5,073 hectares of forest land in question.
    2. Change in forest character: The judge who wrote the order warned that if commercial crops are allowed in forest areas, “the very nature of the forest is bound to change”.
    3. The takeaway: The FRA protects people who live off the forest, not businesses that turn forest land into plantations.
    4. Reference to the CEC: The Court directed the Central Empowered Committee (CEC), a standing body that examines forest violations and reports to the Court, to examine Tamil Nadu’s view that silk cotton is minor forest produce.

    Conclusion

    The Court’s prima facie view is that the FRA protects forest dependence, not plantation farming promoted by the State. The CEC’s finding on whether silk cotton counts as minor forest produce is the next step that will decide the plantations’ future.

    Back2Basics: Agasthyamalai Biosphere Reserve

    1. Location: It lies at the southern end of the Western Ghats, straddling the Tamil Nadu and Kerala border, and is named after the Agasthyamalai peak.
    2. Designation: It was designated a biosphere reserve in 2001 and added to the UNESCO World Network of Biosphere Reserves in 2016.
    3. Protected areas: It includes the Kalakad-Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve and the Neyyar, Peppara and Shendurney Wildlife Sanctuaries.
    4. People and species: The Kani tribal community lives in the landscape, which also shelters the endemic lion-tailed macaque and the Nilgiri tahr.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2019] Consider the following statements: 1. As per recent amendment to the Indian Forest Act, 1927, forest dwellers have the right to fell the bamboos grown on forest areas. 2. As per the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006, bamboo is a minor forest produce. 3. The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 allows ownership of minor forest produce to forest dwellers. Which of the statements given above is / are correct? (a) 1 and 2 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3 ANSWER: (b)”

  • At COP31, ‘overshoot’ narrative cannot replace climate action

    At COP31, ‘overshoot’ narrative cannot replace climate action

    Why in the News

    “Overshoot” has become the buzzword of COP31 to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), which opened in Antalya, Türkiye, as “net-zero” was at COP26 in Glasgow. It arrives as the world prepares to officially accept warming above 1.5 degrees Celsius, and it lets developed countries sidestep their obligations.

    What is “overshoot”, and why has it replaced the real debate?

    1. What it is: A 1.5 degrees Celsius overshoot means crossing that warming level soon and returning below it by the century’s end. It is like overspending a budget now and promising to repay later.
    2. Origin: The term came from climate modelling. Countries now use it in talks to keep 1.5 degrees alive on paper.
    3. The real task: Countries should keep warming as little over 1.5 and as far below 2 degrees as possible. This needs scientific assessment of trade-offs.
    4. The takeaway: Overshoot moves attention from cutting emissions now to removing carbon later, which delays real action.

    How are developed countries still expanding fossil fuels?

    1. Fossil dependence: Fossil fuels still supply most primary energy in the US and the European Union (EU).
    2. US offshore drilling: Having exited the Paris Agreement twice, the US has proposed opening nearly 1.3 billion acres of its waters to offshore drilling.
    3. Norway and the UK: Norway has offered 70 new oil and gas blocks, including in the Arctic. The UK has approved the Jackdaw gas field.
    4. Wadden Sea drilling: Germany and the Netherlands have cleared gas drilling near the Wadden Sea, a UNESCO World Heritage site.
    5. COP31 presidency: Australia, which presides over COP31, has approved 37 fossil fuel projects since 2022.

    How is climate finance falling short?

    1. Inflated reporting: Developed countries reported about $137 billion of climate finance for 2024, but its true value is an estimated quarter to a third.
    2. Loans over grants: About 65% of public climate finance came as loans, adding to developing countries’ debt.
    3. Withdrawn pledges: The US rescinded $4 billion in pledges to the Green Climate Fund, and the UK almost halved its contribution.
    4. Adaptation gap: Adaptation finance fell to $26 billion in 2023, a small fraction of the yearly need.
    5. Trade penalties: The EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), a charge on the carbon content of imports, targets iron, steel, cement and aluminium, sectors central to Global South industry.

    Why does overshoot shift the burden onto the Global South?

    1. Scale of removal: The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) report *Limiting Overshoot* finds that reversing 0.1 degree of warming needs permanent removal of 220 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2).
    2. Removal capacity: The world removes about 2.2 billion tonnes of CO2 a year, almost entirely through forests and soils. Direct air capture, machines that pull CO2 from the air, removes barely 2 million tonnes.
    3. Land claims: National pledges rely on nearly 1.2 billion hectares of land for CO2 removal, mostly in the Global South. UNEP does not say who pays, or on whose land.
    4. Outsourced mitigation: Switzerland plans to meet up to one-third of its 2030 target by buying carbon credits from projects abroad, such as cookstoves in rural Ghana.

    Challenges

    1. Carbon budget ignored: No COP decision has referred to the remaining carbon budget, the CO2 the world can still emit within a warming limit, or to who spent most of it.
    2. Costly, uncertain removal: Direct air capture could cost up to $600 a tonne, and removing a tonne may not undo the warming it caused.
    3. Technology barriers: Intellectual property barriers keep clean technology at a premium, so it is not transferred cheaply.

    Way Forward

    1. Deep domestic cuts: Developed countries should reach net-zero well before 2050 and net-negative emissions within their borders.
    2. Grant-based finance: Provide predictable, grant-based public finance, not loans or private investment.
    3. Article 9.1 guidance: The Climate Finance Work Programme agreed at Belém should guide COP31 on Article 9.1 of the Paris Agreement, the duty of developed countries to finance developing ones.

    Conclusion

    Overshoot keeps the 1.5 degree goal alive on paper and moves the cost of correction onto future removals and the Global South’s land. The test for COP31 is whether its decisions account for past emissions and delivered finance.

    Key numbers

    1. True value of 2024 climate finance: $33 to 45 billion.
    2. Adaptation finance need: at least $310 to 365 billion a year by 2035.
    3. Fossil fuel share of primary energy, 2025: 83% (US), 73% (EU).
    4. Swiss emissions, 2024: only 22% below 1990 levels, against a 50% cut targeted by 2030.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2025] Consider the following statements: Statement I: Article 6 of the Paris Agreement on climate change is frequently discussed in global discussions on sustainable development and climate change. Statement II: Article 6 of the Paris Agreement on climate change sets out the principles of carbon markets. Statement III: Article 6 of the Paris Agreement on climate change intends to promote inter-country non-market strategies to reach their climate targets. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements? (a) Both Statement II and Statement III are correct and both of them explain Statement I (b) Both Statement II and Statement III are correct but only one of them explains Statement I (c) Only one of the Statements II and III is correct and that explains Statement I (d) Neither Statement II nor Statement III is correct ANSWER: (a)”

  • A case for Nepal: suing major carbon emitters for floods

    A case for Nepal: suing major carbon emitters for floods

    Why in the News

    The August 2026 floods in Nepal, which killed thousands, are overwhelmingly attributed to climate change and follow Pakistan’s 2022 floods as a worst-case South Asian scenario. Their victims could sue major emitters through climate litigation, as plaintiffs in Europe and the United States have done for two decades. Proving that a distant emitter caused a particular flood remains the main legal hurdle.

    What is climate litigation, and why is causation its hardest test?

    1. What it is: Climate litigation means people exposed to climate risks suing states or companies for harm to life, health, property and family life. It is like neighbours suing a factory whose smoke harms them, but across borders.
    2. Causation problem: It is extremely difficult to prove that a distant state’s or company’s failure to curb greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions harmed flood victims in Nepal’s districts bordering Tibet.
    3. Incremental contribution: Courts now accept that each emitter’s failure adds to global cumulative GHGs, which raise the likelihood of extreme events everywhere. The actual damage then depends on local exposure, vulnerability and resilience.
    4. The takeaway: A victim must tie one emitter’s share of a global problem to a local loss, so proof decides most claims.

    Who can claim to be a victim, and does Nepal’s border region qualify?

    1. Diffuse harm: Climate wrongs harm society as a whole. Courts usually require direct and proximate harm, meaning harm to a specific person that follows closely from the defendant’s act.
    2. Standing (the right to bring a case): Victims must be shown to face a specific exposure, distinct from the general population. Only then can they invoke individual or group rights and claim compensation.
    3. GLOF exposure: People in the Trishuli and Bhote Koshi river basins on the Tibet-Nepal border have faced glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs), sudden floods from bursting ice-dammed lakes, for three decades.
    4. Retreating glaciers: Glaciers in the Tibetan Autonomous Region have retreated faster since 2010. These earlier risks could meet the legal test of an imminent catastrophe, a danger close at hand.

    What have foreign courts held on the liability of large emitters?

    1. Lliuya v. RWE (Germany): A Peruvian national sued the German energy firm RWE under German private nuisance law. He argued that carbon dioxide from its coal plants, 5,000 miles away, made glaciers near his home unstable.
    2. Hamm ruling: The Higher Court of Appeal in Hamm ruled on 28 May 2025 that RWE can be held responsible in principle. It dismissed this claim for inadequate proof of an imminent risk.
    3. Milieudefensie v. Royal Dutch Shell: In November 2024, the Dutch Court of Appeal held that major contributors to climate change owe a duty of care, a legal duty to avoid harming others, to limit GHG emissions.
    4. Asmania v. Holcim (Switzerland): Four Indonesian islanders have sued the Swiss building-material firm Holcim in the Cantonal Court of Zug, seeking emission cuts and compensation.

    Why should Nepal’s victims litigate when no ruling binds them?

    1. Distance no longer a shield: The Hamm court accepted that past emissions add to climate risks in proportion to their size. It also held that German civil law can apply to transboundary harm, damage across borders.
    2. No binding precedent: Foreign rulings do not bind courts in other countries. Courts are increasingly aware of large emitters’ duties, so litigation remains worth pursuing.

    Challenges

    1. Proof of imminent risk: Even courts that accept liability in principle demand proof of imminent harm, the test that defeated the RWE claim.
    2. Cost of foreign suits: Suing a multinational in its home court needs money, lawyers and expert evidence that flood-hit mountain communities rarely have.
    3. Contested attribution science: Linking one flood to one emitter needs event attribution studies, which estimate how far climate change made a flood more likely. Defendants can challenge them as uncertain.

    Way Forward

    1. Document exposed households: Nepal should record GLOF-exposed communities in the Trishuli and Bhote Koshi basins, so victims can prove specific exposure.
    2. Commission attribution studies: Fund scientific studies linking the August 2026 floods to glacier loss and emissions.
    3. Build legal partnerships: Work with international environmental law networks to file and fund suits in emitters’ home jurisdictions.

    Conclusion

    European courts now accept that a large emitter can owe a duty to distant victims, yet proof of a direct and imminent link still decides who is compensated. Whether South Asian flood victims turn that principle into an award will depend on documenting their exposure before they reach court.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “No direct PYQ traced in the provided files. Thematic PYQ: [2025, GS1, 10 marks] How are climate change and the sea level rise affecting the very existence of many island nations? Discuss with examples.”

  • Cracker conundrum

    Why in the News

    The Air Quality Index (AQI) in several north Indian cities turned “severe” on Diwali night, after the Supreme Court (SC) temporarily relaxed the ban on firecrackers. Sensors in Delhi and its outskirts reported PM2.5 (fine particles small enough to lodge deep in the lungs) above 1,000, reopening the question of how crackers should be regulated.

    What did the Court decide, and what evidence is it waiting for?

    1. Temporary relaxation: The SC eased its ban on crackers for the festival. Its order last week accepted that emissions harm health but sought quantitative evidence of what Diwali emissions do.
    2. Proof nearly impossible: Direct, causative evidence of this kind is almost impossible to furnish, because cracker smoke mixes with every other source in the same air.
    3. Late decision: The cracker season begins a fortnight before Diwali. An earlier ruling would have given stockists time to stock “green” crackers, designed to emit less.
    4. The takeaway: By demanding proof that cannot be produced, the Court let a predictable pollution spike recur.

    Why is the crackers’ share of pollution hard to isolate?

    1. Winter weather: Slackening winds and post-monsoon dryness trap particles from vehicles, industries, construction dust and stubble burning. Crackers add to air that is already degraded.
    2. Recurring Diwali spikes: Delhi’s five-day average AQI has risen around Diwali in each of the last three years, most recently from about 350 to 376.
    3. Share cannot be separated: The timing of these spikes fits a cracker contribution. Their exact share cannot be split from other emissions and weather effects.

    Do ‘green’ crackers solve the problem, and can faith override health?

    1. Lab-only gains: CSIR-NEERI, the national environmental research institute that developed green crackers, says they cut emissions by only 30% to 45%, and only under strict laboratory conditions.
    2. Percentages hide totals: A percentage cut says nothing about the total particulate matter released. The post-Deepavali AQI reflects that total.
    3. Faith linked to crackers: The Court treats bursting crackers as part of religious observance. It only nominally accepts that religious custom cannot override health.

    Challenges

    1. Policing sales: The Court acknowledges the huge difficulty of policing cracker sales across thousands of outlets, but does not address it.
    2. Illegal supply: The Court was told an absolute ban would encourage “illegal crackers from across the border”.
    3. Unverifiable labels: Buyers cannot easily tell a certified green cracker from a conventional one.
    4. Livelihoods: Cracker manufacturing supports many workers. Eg. The industry cluster at Sivakasi, Tamil Nadu.

    Way Forward

    1. Early final verdict: The Court should pronounce a final view on crackers well before Deepavali 2027, not in the festival week.
    2. Time-bound policy: It should lay down the contours for the government to limit the manufacture, sale and bursting of crackers on a fixed timeline.
    3. Total-emission standards: Certify green crackers on total particulate output, not only on percentage reduction.
    4. Season-long action: Curb vehicle, industry, dust and stubble emissions through the whole winter, not just around Diwali.

    Conclusion

    Crackers add a festival peak to air already trapped by winter weather, and the Court’s wait for causal proof has allowed that peak to return each year. Whether it settles the question with a binding, time-bound framework well ahead of the next festival season is the decision to watch.

    Key numbers

    1. Delhi five-day average AQI, Diwali 2024: about 298 before, 358 after.
    2. Delhi five-day average AQI, Diwali 2025: about 259 before, 315 after.

    Back2Basics: Air Quality Index (AQI)

    1. What it is: Launched in 2014, the AQI turns readings for eight pollutants into a single number with a health message attached.
    2. How it is set: A sub-index is computed for each pollutant, and the worst sub-index becomes the reported AQI.
    3. Six bands: The scale runs from Good through Satisfactory, Moderate, Poor and Very Poor to Severe, which begins at 401 on a scale topping out at 500.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2015, GS1, 12 marks] Mumbai, Delhi and Kolkata are the three mega cities of the country but the air pollution is much more serious problem in Delhi as compared to the other two. Why is this so?”

  • Used vehicles: Ease of transactions depends on state

    Used vehicles: Ease of transactions depends on state

    Why in the News

    Transferring a used vehicle is meant to be a simple online process, yet a registration certificate (RC) transfer takes 7 to 10 days in Andhra Pradesh and over 30 days in Uttar Pradesh. The new Ease of Vehicle Ownership Index finds that no State scores above six out of ten.

    What is the Ease of Vehicle Ownership Index?

    1. What it is: The index scores States on how easily a used vehicle changes hands, from transfer rules to the real cost paid. It works like a report card for each State’s transport offices.
    2. Who prepared it: The startup industry body IndiaTech.org prepared it with the consumer organisation Consumer VOICE. The Union Minister of State for Road Transport and Highways released it.
    3. Coverage: It covers 15 States, which together hold over 85% of India’s organised used-car market.
    4. Six metrics: States are scored on:
      • clarity and consistency of ownership transfer rules;
      • availability and reliability of online systems;
      • speed, predictability and procedural burden;
      • fee clarity, application tracking and grievance redress;
      • consumer protection, dealer support and trade infrastructure;
      • official fees against the actual all-in cost of transfer.
    5. The takeaway: How easily a used vehicle changes hands depends on the State, because each State runs its own transfer process.

    How did the States perform?

    1. Top performers: Andhra Pradesh leads with 5.91 out of 10, followed by Kerala, Tamil Nadu and Delhi.
    2. Bottom performers: Uttar Pradesh comes last at 2.47, just behind Bihar and West Bengal.
    3. Cost, the weakest pillar: 12 States score below 3.5 on cost. Manual stages, court notaries, vehicle inspections and multiple departmental signatures push the real charge well above the official fee.

    Why is transferring a vehicle so hard?

    1. Biometric versus manual: In Andhra Pradesh, buyer, seller and lender confirm identity biometrically, so the transfer moves fast. Elsewhere, paper checks stretch it to weeks.
    2. Dual submission: In 13 of the 15 States, applicants file online but must still deliver physical copies to the Regional Transport Office (RTO).
    3. Agents and uneven tax: Complex rules push buyers and sellers to paid agents, and road tax differs from State to State.

    Why does it matter now?

    1. Rising used-to-new ratio: Used cars sold for every new car are expected to rise from 1.3 to 1.7 by the end of the decade. Used cars cost less upfront for middle-income households.
    2. First-time owners: 60% to 65% of used-vehicle buyers are first-time car owners, so procedural friction hits new buyers hardest.
    3. A doubling market: The pre-owned vehicle market is expected to roughly double by 2030, so slow transfers will affect far more households.

    Challenges

    1. State-run patchwork: Registration and road tax sit with State transport departments, so procedures and fees change at every State border.
    2. Loan liens: Removing a bank’s hypothecation (its claim on a vehicle bought on loan) after repayment needs separate paperwork, which stalls transfers.
    3. Pending challans: Unpaid traffic fines block a transfer, and dealers cannot clear them without the owner’s one-time password (OTP).
    4. Seller liability: Until the RC changes hands, the seller stays the registered owner, answerable for fines and accidents involving the vehicle.

    Way Forward

    1. Statutory timeline: Amend the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 to fix a stepwise timeline for every transfer.
    2. Digital documents as proof: Accept DigiLocker and mParivahan documents as primary evidence at every RTO, ending dual submission.
    3. Bank-VAHAN integration: Link banks with VAHAN in real time so hypothecation is removed automatically when a loan closes.
    4. Dealer clearance of challans: Let authorised dealers clear pending challans during a transfer without the owner’s OTP.

    Conclusion

    Used-vehicle transfers remain slow and costly in most States because digital filing has been added on top of manual steps instead of replacing them. Whether the Centre and States act on the report’s recommendations, starting with a legal transfer timeline, will decide if a fast-growing market can shed its reliance on agents.

    Key numbers

    1. Next-best scores (out of 10): Kerala 5.74; Tamil Nadu and Delhi 4.58 each.
    2. Lowest scores above Uttar Pradesh: Bihar 2.51; West Bengal 2.56.
    3. Pre-owned vehicle market: $36.4 billion (2024-25), projected $73.5 billion (2030).

    Back2Basics: VAHAN

    1. What it is: VAHAN is the national vehicle registration system used by RTOs to record registration, ownership, tax, fitness and permits.
    2. Who runs it: It was built by the National Informatics Centre (NIC) for the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways.
    3. Companion system: Sarathi, its sister application, handles driving licences on the same national platform.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2025, GS2, 10 marks] E-governance projects have a built-in bias towards technology and back-end integration than user-centric designs. Examine.”

  • The republic of non-toppers is speaking up

    Why in the News

    The “cockroach movement” of young Indians against paper leaks and joblessness is a revolt of the non-topper majority against a theory of citizenship that rewards those who top entrance exams. The movement is widening nationalism to include rights to jobs, fair examinations and equal treatment by the state.

    What theory of citizenship is being challenged?

    1. The topper as citizen: Under this theory, the topper who clears entrance exams builds institutions, staffs the state and writes policy. Everyone else is a “demographic dividend gone sour”, youth who failed to deliver growth.
    2. Merit as moral immunity: Credentials do not only open doors, they “close inquiries” into the holder’s conduct. An exam rank works like a lifelong character certificate, shielding even an officer engaged in petty extraction.
    3. Failing merit institutions: This summer, national medical entrance results were cancelled after a paper leak affecting over two million students. Many families had sold possessions to pay coaching fees.
    4. The takeaway: When the exam system itself fails, the claim that rank equals virtue collapses, and the excluded majority starts to speak for itself.

    How are non-toppers reshaping politics?

    1. Rejecting the prescribed route: Non-toppers now blame the route, not themselves, for their failure. They reject the toppers’ monopoly over serious political movements, and their struggle needs no heroes or ideological purity.
    2. Reclaiming nationalism: Protesters carry the tricolour and claim public spaces. They stretch nationalism beyond security and cultural pride to employment, fair examinations, transparency and the right to protest.
    3. Second plebeianisation: Ordinary people are entering public debate, a space elites once held, in a “second plebeianisation” of politics. The first, in the 1990s, broke the upper-caste hold on legislatures.
    4. Citizen as author: The non-topper wants to be the author of policy, not its object. Citizenship becomes an active public practice, not a credential held passively.
    5. Isothymia: Francis Fukuyama holds that democracy rests on isothymia, the desire to be respected as an equal. The movement claims dignity without needing a rank.

    Why is the movement gaining ground now?

    1. Shared labour market: Even workers in regular salaried jobs average just Rs 26,850 a month. Toppers and non-toppers increasingly face the same broken job market and indifferent state.
    2. Toppers joining in: As the gap that once justified the hierarchy narrows, toppers are joining the struggle for a “new citizenship”.
    3. Insult turned identity: The Chief Justice of India (CJI) used “cockroach” as an insult. Protesters adopted it, pointing to the creature’s defining trait: it survives attempts to stamp it out.

    Challenges

    1. Exam integrity deficit: Repeated leaks in national entrance exams erode public trust in merit-based selection itself.
    2. Credentials without jobs: Degrees and ranks no longer secure stable employment, so the reward for clearing exams keeps shrinking.
    3. Leaderless protest: A movement without leaders or organisation struggles to turn street pressure into policy change.
    4. Dismissive official responses: Labelling young protesters with insults deepens their distance from public institutions.

    Way Forward

    1. Leak-proof examinations: Enforce the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024 and secure the paper chain up to the exam centre.
    2. Job-rich growth: Expand regular salaried work so that one exam is not the only route to security.
    3. Channels for youth voice: Create consultative forums and campus elections so young people help shape the policies they protest.
    4. Respectful engagement: Public authorities should respond to protesters’ demands on their merits rather than dismiss them.

    Conclusion

    The movement contests the idea that an exam rank decides who counts as a full citizen, and it now draws support from both sides of that divide. Whether the state answers with fair examinations and decent jobs, rather than contempt, will decide if this assertion turns into reform or lasting alienation.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2026, GS2, 15 marks] To what extent do pressure groups, social movements and corporate lobbies deepen pluralistic democracy in India by representing excluded interests? Analyse whether the growing convergence of corporate wealth and political power poses a threat to the autonomy of formal democratic institutions.”

  • How students are the first line of resistance

    Why in the News

    Recent student protests, from anti-paper leak agitations to protests against the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, build on a decade of unresolved campus grievances. Protesters now face peace bonds, cases under the anti-terror Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA) and the loss of Jantar Mantar as a protest site.

    Why are students called the first line of resistance?

    1. Early warning: Students are the first section of society to recognise a threat to democracy and to stand up for it.
    2. Grievances that return: Grievances suppressed through distortion do not disappear. Left unresolved, they change shape and return as new movements.
    3. Older precedent: The anti-Emergency protests also began as a student movement against a fee hike at a Gujarat university.
    4. The takeaway: Treating campus protest as a passing outburst misreads it, since each wave carries the unresolved grievances of the last.

    Which earlier movements does today’s wave build on?

    1. FTII hunger strike: Film and Television Institute of India (FTII) students fasted for 139 days in 2015 against Gajendra Chauhan‘s appointment as chairman. He stayed, but his tenure was cut short.
    2. Campus campaigns: Several campus campaigns followed:
      • Occupy UGC, for the non-NET fellowship, a stipend for research scholars without a national eligibility fellowship;
      • Justice for Rohith Vemula and #WhereIsNajeeb;
      • protests against sedition cases on Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) students.
    3. Fees and citizenship: Anti-fee hike protests at Panjab University, JNU and Delhi University, and the equal citizenship movement, drew on the same energy.
    4. Gender justice: The 2012 Nirbhaya protests, and later protests over the Unnao and Hathras cases and the wrestlers’ harassment complaints, showed students mobilising for justice.

    How have the issues and the mode of protest changed?

    1. Education policy: The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 was imposed through a press conference and centralises education policy. Students resisted it through the Jantar Mantar 1.0 movement.
    2. Memes and reels: Gen Z protests through satire, memes and reels on Instagram, Reddit and YouTube. Showing police in humorous clips signals that this generation no longer fears them.
    3. Electoral grievances: Protests over electoral malpractice matter as much as paper leaks, because compromised elections leave peaceful protest as the only route to accountability.
    4. Wider youth concerns: Youth also protest over corporate monopoly over jobs, artificial intelligence (AI) and its regulation, the state’s withdrawal from the public sector and global conflict.

    How is the state responding, and what do students demand?

    1. Peace bonds: Protesters are pressed to sign peace bonds, written undertakings to keep the peace. The All India Students’ Association (AISA) president refused to sign one.
    2. Anti-terror law: The UAPA is meant for terror cases and carries strict bail conditions. It is now being used against student activists.
    3. Protest sites and unions: The government has denotified Jantar Mantar as a protest site. Campus protests demand restored student union elections.

    Challenges

    1. Criminalising dissent: Applying an anti-terror law to campus activism turns political disagreement into long pre-trial detention.
    2. Shrinking protest space: With designated sites denotified, peaceful assembly has no settled lawful venue in the capital.
    3. No elected student voice: Without union elections, campus grievances lack a formal channel and spill onto the streets.

    Way Forward

    1. Regular union elections: Hold campus elections on a fixed calendar. Eg. The Lyngdoh Committee (2006) guidelines.
    2. Notified protest sites: Restore designated spaces for peaceful assembly. Eg. Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan v. Union of India (2018).
    3. Narrow use of UAPA: Confine anti-terror charges to terror offences and review pending cases against students.

    Conclusion

    Student protest in India is a continuous chain in which unresolved grievances return in new forms and on new platforms. Whether the state answers it through campus democracy and open spaces for dissent, or through policing, will decide whether that dissent stays peaceful.

    What is the Right to Protest?

    1. Constitutional basis: Peaceful protest rests on Article 19(1)(a) (speech and expression) and Article 19(1)(b) (peaceful assembly without arms).
    2. Reasonable restrictions: Article 19(3) allows the state to restrict assembly in the interest of public order and India’s sovereignty and integrity.
    3. Ramlila Maidan (2012): In In Re: Ramlila Maidan Incident, the Supreme Court held that peaceful protest is a fundamental right the state cannot curtail arbitrarily.
    4. Public ways (2020): In Amit Sahni v. Commissioner of Police, on the Shaheen Bagh sit-in, the Court held that public roads cannot be occupied indefinitely.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2026, GS2, 15 marks] To what extent do pressure groups, social movements and corporate lobbies deepen pluralistic democracy in India by representing excluded interests? Analyse whether the growing convergence of corporate wealth and political power poses a threat to the autonomy of formal democratic institutions.”

  • ECI’s belated u-turn doesn’t undo injustice of mass exclusion

    Why in the News

    Voters wrongly dropped in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls no longer have to pose as new voters to return; they keep their old voter identity numbers. The Election Commission of India (ECI) has offered this and other reliefs to 4.52 crore excluded voters in seven States, but not where the SIR is complete.

    What is the SIR, and how did it push voters off the rolls?

    1. What it is: The SIR is a house-to-house re-enumeration of voters. Every voter fills a fresh enumeration form, checked by Booth Level Officers (BLOs). It works like a club making every member re-register.
    2. ASDD exclusions: Voters who were not re-enrolled were marked “Absent, Shifted, Dead, Duplicate” (ASDD) and left off the draft rolls, 13.3 crore of them across India.
    3. Form 6 as the only route back: Wrongly excluded voters could return only by declaring themselves new voters on Form 6. The fresh Elector Photo Identity Card (EPIC) number they got erased their past enrolment.
    4. The takeaway: A clean-up of the rolls made restoration depend on a false declaration, so many eligible voters stayed out.

    What pushed the ECI to change course?

    1. Supreme Court hearing: On a Delhi SIR petition, the Supreme Court called the Form 6 requirement an “error” and a “structural incongruity”, since it made eligible voters declare themselves new.
    2. Alternative forms: The Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India (CJI) allowed the Enumeration Form or Form 8, which corrects or shifts an entry. It called the legality of “Logical Discrepancy” notices an open question.
    3. ECI’s first clarification: The ECI first kept Form 6, only promising not to prosecute the false “first-time voter” declaration. Earlier reversals, after media exposure and protests, stayed internal.

    What reliefs does the ECI’s letter offer?

    1. Seven States covered: The letter covers Delhi, Maharashtra, Haryana, Andhra Pradesh, Jharkhand, Telangana and Nagaland.
    2. Deadline waiver and address changes: Late enumeration forms are accepted with an explanation. Voters who moved give their new address instead of filing Form 6.
    3. Homeless voters: People without homes, including residents of demolished slums, can be enrolled through simple BLO field verification.
    4. Correction, not re-enrolment: Rule 21(1) of the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960 lets the Electoral Registration Officer (ERO), the official who maintains the roll, correct names omitted by “inadvertence or error”. Restored voters get their old EPIC numbers back.

    Does the reversal redeem the SIR?

    1. Admission of error: The reversals show the ECI was “bluffing” for 16 months. The Supreme Court pushed it back towards inclusion.
    2. Burden still on the voter: The SIR still makes voters prove they belong on the rolls. This overturns the presumption of citizenship, under which an enrolled voter need not prove eligibility.
    3. Lineage-based voting: The SIR ties the vote to lineage, against universal adult franchise, so it should be rolled back.

    Challenges

    1. Relief limited to seven States: About three-fourths of States finished the SIR without these reliefs. Eg. Bengaluru saw greater exclusion than Delhi.
    2. Polls already held: Bihar and West Bengal voted on rolls carrying large-scale deletions.
    3. Earlier Form 6 filers: Voters who already re-enrolled through Form 6 have no stated route back to their old EPIC numbers.

    Way Forward

    1. Uniform relief: Extend the waiver, field verification and Rule 21(1) correction to every State where the SIR ran.
    2. Restore, not re-enrol: Convert Form 6 re-enrolments back into voters’ original entries and EPIC numbers.
    3. Citizenship kept separate: Refer any doubt on citizenship to the authority under the Citizenship Act, 1955, not to a roll revision.

    Conclusion

    The ECI has conceded that its remedy for wrongly excluded voters was flawed. Whether restoration is extended everywhere, and whether excluded voters actually return before the next polls, will decide if the reversal undoes the exclusion.

    About Electoral Roll Revision in India

    1. Legal basis: The ECI controls electoral rolls under Article 324. Section 21 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950 governs their preparation and revision.
    2. Summary versus special revision: Routine summary revisions update rolls before elections. Section 21(3) allows a special revision at any time, for reasons recorded in writing.
    3. Past intensive revisions: Intensive revisions were held 13 times up to 2004.
    4. Notice before deletion: Rule 18 of the 1960 Rules requires notice and a hearing before a name is deleted, a safeguard stressed in Lal Babu Hussein (1995).

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2026, GS2, 10 marks] Is the right to vote a fundamental right? Discuss the position of the Election Commission of India while undertaking the revision of electoral rolls. Can it also examine the question of citizenship of voters?”

  • Unidentified vehicles raise illegal activity risks at barrier-less plazas

    Why in the News

    Barrier-less tolling has moved toll collection from a working FASTag read at a boom barrier to an automatic match of the FASTag with the vehicle’s number plate, and vehicles that fail the match cross without paying. At least one in 10 vehicles at the Shahjahanpur plaza on NH-48 in Rajasthan is “unidentified“, so the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH) is holding talks with investigating agencies and Goods and Services Tax (GST) authorities.

    What is Multi-Lane Free Flow tolling, and how does it work?

    1. What it is: Multi-Lane Free Flow (MLFF) tolling, a National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) initiative, deducts toll without stopping vehicles. It works like a metro card read as a commuter walks past, with no turnstile.
    2. Why it was introduced: To end congestion and stops at toll plazas.
    3. How toll is charged: Toll is deducted only when the FASTag and its linked number plate match. A FASTag with insufficient balance triggers an e-notice, giving 72 hours to pay.
    4. Rollout: NHAI launched MLFF in May at Choryasi in Surat, Gujarat, and it now runs at seven fee plazas. India joins the United States, Taiwan, Singapore and Australia in using it.
    5. The takeaway: Removing the barrier removed the physical check, so any vehicle the system cannot match passes free.

    How do vehicles go unidentified, and how large is the problem?

    1. Hidden or fake plates: A vehicle is unidentified when its number plate or FASTag is covered or not visible, or its plate is fake or impersonated.
    2. Rising numbers: The count is rising every month. About 3% of vehicles at Manoharpura and about 2% at Delhi’s Mundka-Bakkarwala plaza went unidentified.
    3. Shahjahanpur: Since MLFF went live there, 2.60 lakh of about 24 lakh vehicles crossing the plaza went unidentified.
    4. Paranur: Tamil Nadu’s Paranur plaza recorded over 500 unidentified vehicles in its first 20 days of operation.
    5. Fully barrier-less corridor: All three plazas on the Gurgaon-Jaipur section of NH-48, Daulatpura, Manoharpura and Shahjahanpur, run MLFF, so an unidentified vehicle can travel it toll-free.

    Why does this worry the government?

    1. Illegal activities: Untraceable vehicles could be used for smuggling, illegal sand mining and other crimes.
    2. GST evasion: The e-way bill (an electronic permit for moving goods) is linked to FASTag, so unidentified vehicles can help evade GST.
    3. Revenue loss: NHAI and banks lose toll revenue, since no mechanism exists to recover toll from vehicles that cannot be identified.
    4. Newly visible problem: Boom-barrier plazas needed only a working FASTag, so plate mismatches went unseen. Impersonating a number plate is a serious crime, not a routine toll violation.

    What measures are being considered?

    1. Penalties and FIRs: A penalty of more than twice the toll and registration of First Information Reports (FIRs) are under consideration.
    2. Dedicated portal: An internal portal is being built to identify such vehicles and share the data with relevant departments. The matter is reviewed every 15 days.
    3. Data matching with AI: MLFF is awarded in stages, so vehicles stay traceable at boom-barrier plazas. There, artificial intelligence (AI) will match VAHAN registration data on model and colour with FASTag transactions within 10 minutes.

    Challenges

    1. Camera dependence: Barrier-less tolling relies on reading plates, which fails when plates are dirty, damaged or non-standard.
    2. Recovery after the fact: Without a barrier, toll is recovered only by tracing owners later, which is slow and costly.
    3. Data sharing: Sharing vehicle movement data across agencies needs clear limits on use.

    Way Forward

    1. Tamper-proof plates: States should enforce High Security Registration Plates (HSRP) to make plates harder to fake.
    2. Dues linked to registration: Bar transfer or renewal of a vehicle’s registration until unpaid e-notices are cleared.
    3. Purpose-limited data use: Share toll data with agencies only for stated purposes, under the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023.

    Conclusion

    Barrier-less tolling has made toll evasion visible but not yet recoverable. MoRTH’s decision on penalties, FIRs and data matching, expected within a month, is the next milestone to watch.

    Back2Basics: FASTag

    1. What it is: A radio frequency identification (RFID) tag fixed on a vehicle’s windscreen and linked to a bank account or wallet, from which toll is deducted electronically.
    2. System: It runs under the National Electronic Toll Collection (NETC) programme of the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI).
    3. Mandate: FASTag has been mandatory for four-wheelers at national highway fee plazas since 15 February 2021; vehicles without one pay double the fee.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2024, GS3, 10 marks] What is the technology being employed for electronic toll collection on highways? What are its advantages and limitations? What are the proposed changes that will make this process seamless? Would this transition carry any potential hazards?”

More posts