💥Crack UPSC In 1st Attempt | Admission Open | Ultimate Assessment Program 2027/2028
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Search results for: “”

  • PM-SETU: One Year of Transforming India’s ITIs

    PM-SETU: One Year of Transforming India’s ITIs

    Why in the News?

    • PM-SETU was launched on 4 October 2025.
    • Completes one year on 4 October 2026.
    • Focus: modernisation of Government ITIs, industry-aligned training and demand-driven vocational education. Pasted text

    Key Facts

    • Full form: Pradhan Mantri Skilling and Employability Transformation through Upgraded ITIs.
    • Total outlay: ₹60,000 crore
      • Centre: ₹30,000 crore
      • States: ₹20,000 crore
      • Industry: ₹10,000 crore
    • Targets 1,000 Government ITIs.
    • Uses Hub-and-Spoke model:
      • 200 Hub ITIs
      • 800 Spoke ITIs
    • Each Hub connected to around 4 Spoke ITIs. Pasted text

    Component I: Government ITIs

    • 1,000 Government ITIs upgraded.
    • Hubs provide:
      • Innovation centres
      • Training-of-trainers facilities
      • Production units
      • Placement services
    • Spokes provide wider access to modern infrastructure and training.
    • Focus on smart classrooms, modern laboratories, digital content and industry-aligned courses.

    Component II: NSTIs

    • Capacity augmentation of 5 National Skill Training Institutes (NSTIs):
      1. Bhubaneswar
      2. Chennai
      3. Hyderabad
      4. Kanpur
      5. Ludhiana
    • Establishment of sector-specific National Centres of Excellence.
    • Advanced training of trainers through international partnerships. Pasted text

    Industry-Led Governance

    • ITI selection is led by States/UTs in consultation with industry.
    • National Steering Committee (NSC):
      • Chaired by Secretary, MSDE.
      • Provides policy direction.
      • Finalises guidelines.
      • Monitors implementation.
    • Strategic Investment Plan (SIP) required from prospective industry partners. Pasted text

    SPV Structure

    • Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs) govern upgraded ITI clusters.
    • Anchor Industry Partner: 51%
    • Centre: 24.5%
    • State Government: 24.5% Pasted text

    One-Year Progress

    • 850 ITIs identified:
      • 172 Hub ITIs
      • 678 Spoke ITIs
    • 36 States/UTs identified clusters and created dedicated budget heads.
    • 35 States/UTs constituted State Steering Committees.
    • 26 States/UTs initiated industry participation.
    • Nationwide rollout approved for all 200 ITI clusters.
    • SIPs approved for 14 ITI clusters.
    • SIP investment: ₹3,446 crore. Pasted text

    New-Age Courses

    DGT has introduced 32 new-age courses under the Craftsmen Training Scheme covering:

    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Cyber Security
    • Additive Manufacturing
    • Electric Vehicles
    • Semiconductor Technology
    • Robotics
    • Green Hydrogen
    • Drones
    • Internet of Things (IoT)
    • Solar Energy
    • 5G
    • Software Testing Pasted text

    International Partnerships

    • Singapore – NSTI Chennai
    • France – NSTI Kanpur
    • Australia – NSTI Bhubaneswar
    • Germany – NSTI Hyderabad Pasted text

    ITIs: Important Background

    • ITIs provide vocational training under the Craftsmen Training Scheme (CTS).
    • Training duration: 6 months to 2 years depending on trade.
    • Directorate General of Training (DGT), under MSDE, is the apex organisation for vocational training at national level.
    • ITIs are under administrative and financial control of State Governments and UT Administrations.
    • Total ITIs increased from 9,776 in 2014 to 13,888 in 2026.
    • ITI enrolment increased from 9.51 lakh in 2014-15 to 14.70 lakh in 2025-26. Pasted text

    UPSC Prelims Quick Revision

    1. PM-SETU was launched on 4 October 2025.
    2. Total outlay is ₹60,000 crore.
    3. It targets 1,000 Government ITIs.
    4. Hub-Spoke structure: 200 Hubs + 800 Spokes.
    5. Industry gets 51% ownership in SPVs.
    6. Five NSTIs are covered under Component II.
    7. DGT introduced 32 new-age courses.
    8. 850 ITIs have been identified after one year. Pasted text

    UPSC Prelims Trap

    • PM-SETU targets Government ITIs, not all private ITIs.
    • ITIs are under State/UT administrative and financial control, while DGT coordinates vocational training nationally.
    • SPV ownership is 51% Anchor Industry Partner + 24.5% Centre + 24.5% State.
    • PM-SETU has two components: Government ITI upgradation and NSTI capacity augmentation.
  • NABKISAN WASH Social Bond

    NABKISAN WASH Social Bond

    Why in the News?

    • NABKISAN Finance Limited, a subsidiary of NABARD, listed India’s first Social Bond exclusively focused on Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) on the National Stock Exchange (NSE) on 1 October 2026.
    • The issue raised ₹180 crore and was oversubscribed 1.8 times.

    Key Highlights

    • Issuer: NABKISAN Finance Limited.
    • Parent institution: National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD).
    • Sector: Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH).
    • Amount raised: ₹180 crore.
    • Oversubscription: 1.8 times.
    • Tenure: 5 years.
    • Coupon rate: 8.10%.
    • Maturity: September 2031.
    • Credit ratings: CRISIL AAA (Stable) and CARE AAA (Stable).
    • Listed on the National Stock Exchange (NSE), Mumbai.

    Use of Bond Proceeds

    • Funds will support access to:
      • Safe water
      • Sanitation
      • Hygiene solutions
    • Target beneficiaries include rural and underserved communities.
    • Expected development outcomes include improved:
      • Health
      • Livelihoods
      • Quality of life
    • Demonstrates the use of capital-market instruments for social development financing.

    Institutional Support

    • Water.org: Technical Advisor and Knowledge Partner.
    • Other stakeholders included market institutions, advisors, trustees and arrangers.
    • The bond is intended to deepen India’s sustainable finance market.

    Important Full Forms

    • WASH: Water, Sanitation and Hygiene
    • NABKISAN: NABKISAN Finance Limited
    • NABARD: National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development
    • NSE: National Stock Exchange
    • CRISIL: Credit Rating Information Services of India Limited
    • CARE: Credit Analysis and Research

    UPSC Prelims Trap

    • NABKISAN, not NABARD directly, issued the bond.
    • It is a Social Bond, specifically focused on WASH, not a conventional government bond.
    • ₹180 crore is the amount raised, while 1.8 times refers to the level of oversubscription.
    • 8.10% is the coupon rate, while September 2031 is the maturity period.
  • India’s First 5.56 km Free-Space Quantum Key Distribution Link

    India’s First 5.56 km Free-Space Quantum Key Distribution Link

    Why in the News?

    • QNu Labs, in collaboration with BISAG-N and IIT Gandhinagar, demonstrated India’s first free-space Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) link over 5.56 km.
    • The field trial was conducted on 27-28 September 2026 between BISAG-N and IIT Gandhinagar.

    Key Highlights

    • Distance: 5.56 km.
    • Technology: Free-space Quantum Key Distribution (QKD).
    • Quantum Bit Error Rate (QBER): below 5%.
    • Secure key generation rate: 230-260 bps.
    • Used Pointing, Acquisition and Tracking (PAT) system.
    • Secure keys were integrated with Vedic Kavach, BISAG-N’s post-quantum cryptography platform.
    • Demonstrated successful end-to-end encryption and decryption of test messages.

    Quantum Key Distribution

    • QKD enables secure communication by using quantum principles to establish cryptographic keys.
    • The demonstration used QNu Labs’ Armos hardware-based QKD device over free-space optical channels.
    • The system was combined with post-quantum cryptography (PQC) and quantum random number generation through Vedic Kavach.
    • The integrated architecture provides resilience even when the physical quantum channel is temporarily unavailable.

    Institutions and Roles

    • QNu Labs: Provided the QKD technology and Armos device.
    • BISAG-N: Provided the field environment and integrated Vedic Kavach.
    • IIT Gandhinagar: Provided the academic and experimental environment for the demonstration.
    • The demonstration highlights collaboration between industry, academia and indigenous technology.

    Significance

    • Provides a foundation for longer-distance quantum-secure networks.
    • Can support future satellite-based quantum communication.
    • Strengthens India’s secure communication infrastructure against quantum-era security threats.
    • Demonstrates integration of hardware-based QKD + software-based post-quantum cryptography.

    Prelims Quick Revision

    • India’s first free-space QKD demonstration: 5.56 km.
    • Trial locations: BISAG-N and IIT Gandhinagar.
    • Trial dates: 27-28 September 2026.
    • QBER: below 5%.
    • Key generation: 230-260 bps.
    • QNu Labs’ QKD device: Armos.
    • BISAG-N platform: Vedic Kavach.
    • BISAG-N is an autonomous scientific society under MeitY.
    • Architecture combines QKD + post-quantum cryptography + quantum random number generation.

    UPSC Prelims Trap

    • QKD and post-quantum cryptography are not the same: QKD uses quantum communication principles for key distribution, while PQC is a cryptographic approach designed to resist attacks from quantum computers.
    • The demonstration used free-space optical channels, not a conventional fibre-optic QKD link.
    • 5.56 km refers to the demonstrated communication-link distance, while 230-260 bps refers to the secure key generation rate.
    • Armos is QNu Labs’ hardware-based QKD device, while Vedic Kavach is BISAG-N’s software-based post-quantum cryptography platform.
  • [5th October 2026] The Hindu OpED: The ECI’s constitutional mandate is under strain

    [5th October 2026] The Hindu OpED: The ECI’s constitutional mandate is under strain

    Question (2018, GS2 – 10 Marks): In the light of recent controversy regarding the use of Electronic Voting Machines (EVM), what are the challenges before the Election Commission of India to ensure the trustworthiness of elections in India?
    Linkage: Addresses the primary constitutional burden placed on the ECI—ensuring public confidence, administrative neutrality, and procedural integrity in conducting free and fair elections amidst institutional controversies.
    [2017] Consider the following statements:
    1. The Election Commission of India is a five-member body.
    2. Union Ministry of Home Affairs decides the election schedule for the conduct of both general elections and bye-elections.
    3. Election Commission resolves the disputes relating to splits/mergers of recognized political parties.
    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
    (a) 1 and 2 only (b) 2 only (c) 2 and 3 only (d) 3 only

    Mentor’s Comment

    The Constituent Assembly made the Election Commission independent so that it could protect voters from the executive. The Special Intensive Revision shows the reverse: independence without accountability allows the Commission itself to exclude voters. The reform question is not the Commission’s autonomy but the checks on the person who exercises it, in removal, appointment and immunity.

    Why in the News

    The Constitution placed the Election Commission of India (ECI) beyond executive control to stop partisan deletion of voters, yet the ECI now faces charges of mass deletion through a revision the law does not name. A former Secretary General of the Lok Sabha argues the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) lacks a legal basis and the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC)‘s unilateral decisions have created a constitutional crisis.

    Why did the Constitution-makers centralise and insulate the ECI?

    1. Original proposal: Draft Article 289 proposed decentralised machinery: a chief election commissioner in each province for State rolls and elections, and one at the Centre for national polls.
    2. Why it was rejected: Provincial commissioners, mostly Chief Ministers’ nominees, had deleted voters seen as opponents. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar moved a new Article centralising the machinery “outside the control of the executive government”.
    3. Loyalist fear: Shibban Lal Saxena feared a loyalist CEC and proposed appointment by a two-thirds parliamentary vote, like United States Senate confirmation.
    4. The takeaway: The mass deletion of voters that drove centralisation is now alleged against the central body itself.

    Does the law provide for a special intensive revision?

    1. Ordinary revision: Section 21(2) of the Representation of the People (RP) Act, 1950 provides for revision before each general election or by-election, or in any year the ECI directs.
    2. Method: Under Rule 25 of the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, that revision may be intensive (roll prepared afresh), summary (existing roll updated), or partly both.
    3. Special revision: Section 21(3) allows a special revision for reasons recorded, but only for “any constituency or part of a constituency” where special circumstances exist.
    4. Limits of Article 324: Article 324 lets the ECI act where statute is silent, never against the law. Eg. Mohinder Singh Gill (1978) recognised this gap-filling power.

    Why do the deletions and the decision process raise constitutional questions?

    1. Scale of removal: About 13 crore voters have reportedly been removed nationwide, possibly the largest disenfranchisement exercise in any democracy.
    2. Article 326 conflict: Article 326 provides for universal adult suffrage, so its scheme is to include eligible voters. The SIR has instead worked to exclude them.
    3. Unilateral CEC: The two Election Commissioners (ECs) say they were excluded from crucial decisions. The author argues a decision the CEC takes alone is invalid, as is every action that follows.

    Can the CEC be held to account?

    1. Impeachment route: Opposition parties plan an impeachment motion. The CEC is removed like a Supreme Court judge, only on proved misbehaviour.
    2. Threshold barrier: The presiding officers of both Houses can disallow such a motion at the threshold.
    3. Lifelong immunity: Section 16 of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023 shields the CEC and ECs from civil and criminal liability for life, which even the President lacks.

    Challenges

    1. Ambiguous statute: Section 21(3) does not define a special revision’s scale, so a State-wide exercise is contestable.
    2. Burden on electors: Deleted electors must prove eligibility to return. Eg. Lal Babu Hussein (1995) on this burden.
    3. No internal check: Decisions without the full Commission leave no record of dissent.
    4. Accountability gap: Threshold rejection of motions and lifelong immunity together leave little route to examine a CEC’s conduct.

    Way Forward

    1. Amend Section 21: Parliament should define State-wide revision, its procedure and safeguards in the RP Act.
    2. Recorded collective decisions: The ECI should take every SIR decision by a recorded vote of all three members.
    3. Narrow immunity: Parliament should limit Section 16 to acts done in good faith during the term.
    4. Notice before deletion: No name should leave the roll without individual notice and a hearing.

    Conclusion

    The ECI is now accused of the very exclusion it was built to prevent. Whether the Supreme Court tests the SIR’s legal basis before the remaining final rolls are published is what to watch.

    Independence of the Election Commission of India

    1. Appointment: Anoop Baranwal v. Union of India (2023) placed the Chief Justice of India on the selection panel until Parliament legislated. The 2023 Act replaced the Chief Justice with a Cabinet Minister.
    2. Unequal removal protection: An EC, unlike the CEC, can be removed on the CEC’s recommendation, so ECs lack the CEC’s security of tenure.
    3. Financial dependence: The ECI’s expenses are not charged on the Consolidated Fund of India, so they need Parliament’s vote. The Law Commission’s 255th Report recommended charging them.
    4. Post-retirement posts: No constitutional bar stops a CEC or EC taking a later government post.
  • Why India doesn’t screen for its deadliest cancer

    Why India doesn’t screen for its deadliest cancer

    Why in the News

    Lung cancer has become India’s leading cause of cancer deaths, yet the government’s screening programme at primary health centres (PHCs) still looks only for breast, oral and cervical cancer. Most patients reach hospital after the disease has spread, when survival chances are low.

    What is lung cancer screening, and why does India need it?

    1. What screening is: Screening tests symptom-free people to catch disease early, like a smoke alarm before a fire spreads. For lung cancer the tool is low-dose computed tomography (LDCT), a reduced-radiation CT scan.
    2. Late diagnosis: Lung cancer has no easy test, so 93% of Indian cases are diagnosed at an advanced stage.
    3. Survival gap: Up to 80% of patients survive five years when the cancer is found at stage one, against a small fraction at a late stage.
    4. Current PHC tests: PHCs use cheap checks: a clinical breast exam, a visual oral exam and visual inspection with acetic acid, which turns cervical cancer cells white.
    5. The takeaway: India screens for the cancers that are cheap to detect, not for the one that now kills the most.

    How fast is the burden rising?

    1. Rising deaths: Between 2022 and 2024, lung cancer deaths rose by almost a third, moving it from fourth to first among cancer killers.
    2. Rising cases: New cases rose by more than a third over the same two years, lifting lung cancer from fourth to third in incidence.
    3. Data source: The figures come from the Global Cancer Observatory of the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), the World Health Organization’s cancer agency.

    Why has India not added lung cancer screening?

    1. Cost of screening: An Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) study compared LDCT with chest X-rays and with no screening. LDCT cost the most but gave the highest net monetary benefit, meaning health gains valued in money, minus costs.
    2. Availability of LDCT: PHCs lack CT machines, so people must travel to higher centres, where LDCT is offered only on suspicion.
    3. Population at risk: Global guidelines screen only older, long-term heavy cigarette smokers, missing India’s many non-smoker patients and beedi smokers.
    4. TB false positives: Some fear that India’s high tuberculosis (TB) burden would produce false alarms on scans. A 2021 Mumbai pilot and a 2025 All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) study found no such problem.

    Who should be screened, and what evidence is India building?

    1. Wider high-risk criteria: A 2024 expert statement urged adding beedi smoking, second-hand smoke, biomass fuel, fumes and domestic smoke. Ambient air pollution is flagged as an emerging threat.
    2. ICMR verdict: The ICMR study called LDCT a “cost-effective strategy” and urged policymakers to consider integrating it into national cancer screening programmes.
    3. Indian evidence: The Indian Lung Screening Trial tests LDCT, and the Air Pollution and Cancer Research Ecosystem (AIRCARE) studies how pollution adds to lung cancer risk.
    4. Actionable warnings: Quitting still cuts risk. Cigarette packs could tell smokers over 60 with 20 years of smoking to get screened.

    Challenges

    1. Diagnostic capacity: CT machines and radiologists sit in district and tertiary hospitals, far from most patients.
    2. Follow-up burden: Screening finds nodules needing repeat scans and biopsies.
    3. Undefined Indian risk group: No validated criteria yet identify high-risk non-smokers for screening.
    4. Low uptake: Symptom-free people rarely travel for a test that costs time and wages.

    Way Forward

    1. Validated criteria: The Union Health Ministry should finalise Indian high-risk criteria using Indian Lung Screening Trial results.
    2. District hospital pilots: Start LDCT for high-risk groups at district hospitals, with PHCs referring eligible people.
    3. Institutional screening now: Hospitals with CT machines should offer screening ahead of a national programme.
    4. Linked cessation services: Pair every screening centre with tobacco cessation counselling.

    Conclusion

    India’s cancer screening follows what is cheap to test rather than what kills most, and lung cancer’s rise has exposed that gap. Whether the ICMR’s evidence and the Indian trials lead the Health Ministry to add LDCT for defined high-risk groups is the decision to watch.

    Key numbers

    1. Lung cancer deaths: 75,031 (2022) to 98,687 (2024), from 8.2% to 10.9% of cancer deaths, IARC Global Cancer Observatory.
    2. New lung cancer cases: 81,748 (2022) to 1.12 lakh (2024), from 5.8% to 7.2% of new cancer cases.
    3. Late-stage five-year survival: 7% to 18%.
    4. Global LDCT eligibility: ages 50 to 80, a pack of cigarettes a day for at least 20 years.

    [2024, GS2, 15 marks] In a crucial domain like the public healthcare system, the Indian State should play a vital role to contain the adverse impact of marketisation of the system. Suggest some measures through which the State can enhance the reach of public healthcare at the grassroots level.”

  • The sore lack of hostels in DU

    Why in the News

    The collapse of a five-storey building in Satya Niketan, New Delhi, killed several students living there as paying guests (PGs) and has exposed the shortage of hostels at the University of Delhi (DU). Only about 10 of DU’s more than 80 constituent colleges offer hostel accommodation, so most outstation students depend on private rented rooms.

    How large is DU’s hostel gap?

    1. Old colleges only: Hostels exist mainly in old main-campus colleges such as Miranda House, St. Stephen’s, Hindu, Hansraj and Ramjas. Outside the main campus, only Lady Shri Ram College has one.
    2. Postgraduate shortage: All postgraduate departments together have only 7 to 8 hostels. The south campus has a single women’s hostel.
    3. Capacity versus need: Undergraduate and postgraduate hostels together hold about 2,500 students, against a need running into tens of thousands.
    4. New colleges without hostels: None of the 30 to 40 colleges set up in Delhi under different governments has provided hostel accommodation.
    5. The takeaway: A university drawing students from across India houses only a small fraction of them, leaving the rest to an unregulated private market.

    Who is responsible for the shortage?

    1. University administration: DU’s administration sees hostels as hard to manage and prone to disorder. Some senior administrators openly oppose more hostels.
    2. University Grants Commission (UGC): The UGC funds and sets standards for universities. It neither requires hostels in new colleges built with its funds nor requires them alongside other college infrastructure.
    3. Central government: Budget allocations for higher education have been substantially cut. The education cess, a levy meant for education, is alleged to have been largely diverted to other heads.
    4. Overstaying residents: Some hostellers, especially in postgraduate hostels, stay 10 to 15 years beyond their tenure, occasionally needing police help to evict.

    What does the shortage do to students?

    1. Paying guest market: PG operators around DU earn heavily from students who have no alternative. Eg. Mukherjee Nagar, Hudson Lane and Vijay Nagar near the north campus.
    2. Unsafe living conditions: Outstation students live in cramped, poorly built rooms. The Satya Niketan collapse is the extreme result of these conditions.
    3. Privatisation without safeguards: Leaving student housing to private operators ignores student welfare, so tragedies like the Satya Niketan collapse follow.

    Is rapid hostel construction feasible?

    1. Political will: Large-scale hostel building at emergency speed is possible where governments commit to it.
    2. EFLU precedent: The English and Foreign Languages University (EFLU), a central university in Hyderabad, built hostels for about 3,000 Indian and foreign students in under three years.

    Challenges

    1. Land scarcity: Delhi colleges sit in dense neighbourhoods with little spare land for new hostels.
    2. Capital competition: Hostels compete with classrooms, laboratories and libraries for limited building funds.
    3. Weak PG oversight: Private student housing operates with little structural safety inspection, as the Satya Niketan collapse showed.
    4. Administrative reluctance: Institutions that see hostels as disciplinary risks resist expanding them.

    Way Forward

    1. UGC hostel norm: The UGC should make hostel capacity a condition for funding and recognising new colleges.
    2. Hostel financing: The Centre should fund hostels through the Higher Education Financing Agency (HEFA), which lends for infrastructure in central institutions.
    3. PG registration: Delhi authorities should register PG accommodation and audit its structural safety.
    4. Tenure enforcement: DU should enforce hostel tenure limits so that places rotate to new students.

    Conclusion

    DU’s hostel shortage is a planning failure: colleges were added without the housing their students need, shifting cost and risk onto students and an unregulated rental market. Whether the UGC ties new college funding to hostel capacity, and whether DU announces a time-bound construction plan, will show if the Satya Niketan collapse changes policy.

    Higher Education in India

    1. Scale: India runs the world’s second-largest higher education system, with enrolment estimated at about 4.65 crore in 2026.
    2. Institutions: India has over 1,168 universities and 45,473 colleges, per the All India Survey on Higher Education (AISHE).
    3. Access gap: The Gross Enrolment Ratio (GER), enrolment as a share of the 18 to 23 age group, stood at 28.4% in AISHE 2021-22, far below the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 target of 50%.
    4. Public spending: India allocated 1.57% of GDP to higher education in 2021.

    [2026, GS2, 15 marks] Should education be treated primarily as a welfare obligation of the state or as a strategic investment for building a globally competitive, knowledge-driven nation? Critically evaluate.

  • Two or three?

    Two or three?

    Why in the News

    The Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) designed its three-language policy to end in a Board examination in the third language, but the Supreme Court keeps cutting it back. Its latest ruling extends to current Class 6 students the relief given to Classes 7 to 9: their final Class 10 test in the third language will only be an internal assessment. In practice, the policy is pushing foreign languages out of CBSE schools.

    What is the three-language policy, and why has the Court stepped in?

    1. What it is: The policy requires CBSE students to study three languages, two of them Indian, with the third examined at Class 10. It is like adding a compulsory subject midway through a course.
    2. Why it was introduced: The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 advocates two Indian languages. The Court has found merit in learning more Indian languages to strengthen the federal structure.
    3. What went wrong: Students who had not studied a second “Indian” language until Class 8 would suddenly have to learn one in Class 9, which the Court called too disruptive.
    4. Court’s interventions: The Court asked whether the policy could start from 2027 rather than 2026, to lessen the load until schools are fully prepared. The CBSE has resisted compromise.
    5. The takeaway: The Court is easing the policy’s burden on students before its final ruling, which shows the design did not plan for students already midway through school.

    Why does the status of English matter?

    1. Categorisation question: The Court has suggested treating English as an indigenous language instead of classifying it as foreign.
    2. De facto Indian language: English has been used in India for at least 300 years. It leads in education, courts and professions and serves as a link language for many.
    3. Employment edge: English has given Indians an advantage in global industries such as information technology, which the government’s jobs strategy relies on.
    4. NEP on foreign languages: NEP 2020 also stresses learning foreign languages to support the global mobility of Indians seeking jobs.

    What is the policy doing in practice, and does it serve its aim?

    1. English as the sole foreign language: Two of the three languages must be Indian, and English is needed as the medium of instruction in other subjects. So English takes the only remaining slot, leaving no room for another foreign language.
    2. Default choices: Many schools will keep Hindi first and Sanskrit as the second Indian language up to Class 10. Southern schools will continue with a regional language such as Tamil or Kannada.
    3. Foreign languages squeezed out: The practical result is the removal of Spanish, French and other foreign languages from schools.
    4. Weak cross-regional learning: The stated aim of learning another region’s language goes largely unserved. A demanding extra Indian language adds little practical value for students.

    Challenges

    1. Unprepared schools: Schools lack teachers and time to introduce a new language midway, so students carry the adjustment cost.
    2. Narrower global options: Losing foreign languages weakens students’ preparation for jobs and study abroad.
    3. Perceived imposition: Default Hindi and Sanskrit choices feed resistance in non-Hindi States. Eg. Tamil Nadu’s long-standing two-language policy.
    4. Policy by litigation: Repeated court-ordered changes leave students and schools unsure what each cohort must study.

    Way Forward

    1. Two-language core: The CBSE should make English and the mother tongue the compulsory pair.
    2. Internal assessment: Test any third language of the student’s choice through internal assessment, not a Board examination.
    3. Cohort-wise start: Apply new language requirements only to cohorts that can begin them in early grades.
    4. Foreign language slot: Keep foreign languages as a permitted choice for the third language.

    Conclusion

    The dispute is whether school language policy should serve cultural integration or practical mobility, and the current design gives up the second without securing the first. The Court’s final judgment, and whether the CBSE accepts a third language assessed internally, will decide what CBSE students learn.

    Back2Basics: Three-language formula

    1. Origin: Recommended by the Kothari Commission (1964-66) and adopted in the National Policy on Education, 1968.
    2. Original design: Hindi-speaking States teach Hindi, English and another modern Indian language. Non-Hindi States teach the regional language, Hindi and English.
    3. NEP 2020 version: Retains the formula with flexibility, requiring at least two of the three languages to be native to India and imposing no language on any State.

    [2026, GS2, 15 marks] Should education be treated primarily as a welfare obligation of the state or as a strategic investment for building a globally competitive, knowledge-driven nation? Critically evaluate.”

  • 2 captive-bred Great Indian Bustards released in national park

    Why in the News

    For the first time, Great Indian Bustards (GIBs) bred in captivity have been returned to the wild, as conservation moves from raising birds in enclosures to rewilding them. The Union Environment Minister and Wildlife Institute of India (WII) scientists released two males into Desert National Park, Jaisalmer, Rajasthan, under Project GIB. Only about 150 GIBs are left in the wild.

    What is Project GIB, and why breed the bird in captivity?

    1. What it is: Project GIB is a long-term recovery programme for the critically endangered GIB. It runs two conservation breeding centres in Jaisalmer, at Ramdevra and Sam.
    2. Why it began: The wild population kept falling, so the centres raise a founder population, a starter stock for rewilding. It works like a seed bank kept for replanting a forest.
    3. How breeding works: From 2019, eggs collected from the wild were incubated artificially and the chicks hand-reared. These hand-reared birds later mated in captivity.
    4. Habitat restoration: The Rajasthan forest department has fenced about 200 sq km of grassland enclosures inside the park. WII has tracked tagged birds remotely for years (telemetry), and this data identifies the enclosures as prime breeding habitat.
    5. The takeaway: Captive breeding matters only if the birds survive in the wild, which this first release begins to test.

    What has the release achieved?

    1. First rewilding: Two male birds were released at Sam, the first of 11 birds earmarked for release.
    2. Captive stock: The centres hold 98 captive-bred birds, about 86 of them kept for captive reproduction.
    3. Breeding output: Captive reproduction yields more live chicks each year, with 29 born in 2026 against 24 in 2025.
    4. Reintroduction protocols: The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change says the release will help develop and refine protocols for returning captive-bred birds to natural habitat.

    Why does the GIB matter beyond the species?

    1. Grassland conservation: The GIB depends on open grassland, so protecting it protects an ecosystem often treated as wasteland. The Minister also linked it to land degradation neutrality, a goal where restored land offsets newly degraded land.
    2. Migratory stopover: GIB habitat is a resting stop for birds on the Central Asian Flyway. This migratory corridor crosses 30 countries from North to South Asia, linking the Arctic and Indian Oceans.

    Challenges

    1. Power line collisions: GIBs have poor frontal vision and fly into overhead transmission lines. Eg. The Supreme Court has heard cases on undergrounding lines in GIB habitat since 2021.
    2. Untested survival: Hand-reared birds have not learned predator avoidance or foraging from wild parents, so post-release survival is unknown.
    3. Narrow genetic base: A tiny wild population limits the genetic diversity of the founder stock.
    4. Grassland diversion: Open grasslands are converted to farming and renewable energy parks. Eg. Solar and wind projects in the Thar.

    Way Forward

    1. Post-release tracking: WII should tag every released bird and publish survival data before scaling up releases.
    2. Line mitigation: Power utilities should underground lines or fit bird diverters in priority GIB habitat.
    3. Grassland recognition: Rajasthan should record grasslands as ecosystems, not wasteland, in land records.
    4. Phased releases: Release the remaining earmarked birds in stages, adjusting protocols after each cohort.

    Conclusion

    Project GIB has moved from breeding numbers to the harder test of survival in the wild. Whether the released males survive, settle in the fenced enclosures and pair with wild birds is the metric to watch.

    Back2Basics: Great Indian Bustard

    1. Protection status: Critically Endangered on the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List and listed in Schedule I of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972.
    2. Identity: One of the heaviest flying birds, known locally as Godawan, and the State bird of Rajasthan.
    3. Habitat: Dry grasslands and scrub, with the largest population in Rajasthan, mainly in Desert National Park.
    4. Threats: Overhead power lines, windmills, noise and changes in landscape and cultivation.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2024] Consider the following statements: Statement-I: The Indian Flying Fox is placed under the “vermin” category in the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972. Statement-II: The Indian Flying Fox feeds on the blood of other animals. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements? (a) Both statement I and Statement II are correct and statement II explains statement I (b) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I (c) Staement- I is correct , but Statement II is incorrect* (d) Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct ANSWER:”

  • The tussle over top posts in Central Armed Police Forces and IPS deputation

    Why in the News

    The Supreme Court’s 2025 direction to progressively reduce Indian Police Service (IPS) deputation in the Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs) now runs against a new law that keeps most top posts for deputationists. Contempt petitions alleging non-compliance with that judgment will now be heard alongside the challenge to the Central Armed Police Forces (General Administration) Act, 2026.

    What are the CAPFs, and why are their top posts contested?

    1. Five forces: The CAPFs are the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF), Border Security Force (BSF), Central Industrial Security Force (CISF), Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP) and Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB).
    2. Cadre officers: Each force has its own cadre of Group A executive officers, generally recruited as Assistant Commandants, who can rise to senior command posts.
    3. Deputation route: IPS officers are also lent to the forces, like managers sent from head office. Earlier rules filled 20% of Deputy Inspector General (DIG) and 50% of Inspector General (IG) posts this way.
    4. Cadre grievance: With few posts at the top, every deputation slot cuts promotion chances for career officers of the forces.
    5. The takeaway: The dispute is about who commands the forces: career insiders or IPS officers on deputation.

    Why did stagnation persist after court rulings?

    1. Non-Functional Financial Upgradation (NFFU): NFFU pays a higher grade’s salary when no promotion vacancy exists. The Delhi High Court granted it in 2015, and the Supreme Court upheld it in 2019.
    2. Partial relief: NFFU follows the existing Recruitment Rules, which require a fixed number of years in each rank. The count for the next upgrade restarts only on an actual promotion, so stagnation continues.
    3. Officers’ demand: Cadre officers want Service Rules that base their progression on total qualifying service, not on years spent in each rank.
    4. 2025 judgment: In May 2025 the Supreme Court ruled on cadre career progression and directed a progressive reduction of IPS deputation.
    5. Alleged non-compliance: The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has since brought 46 IPS officers into the forces, which the contempt petitions challenge.

    What does the CAPF Act, 2026 change?

    1. Umbrella framework: The Act, introduced as a Bill in March, creates one framework for Group A officers of all five CAPFs. The Centre frames rules on recruitment, promotion and service conditions.
    2. Override clause: This rule-making power operates notwithstanding any inconsistent judgment, decree or order of a court, so the rules stand even against a contrary court ruling. They also prevail over inconsistent rules or government orders.
    3. Deputation quotas: The Act reserves 50% of IG and at least 67% of Additional Director General (ADG) posts for deputation.
    4. Top posts: All Special Director General and Director General posts go to deputationists.
    5. Opposition objection: Opposition MPs argued that the law sets aside the Supreme Court’s judgment in effect.

    What is the Centre’s case, and why is the hearing itself disputed?

    1. Operational role: The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) argues that CAPFs, given their operational role, cannot be treated on a par with civilian Group A services.
    2. Centre-State link: IPS officers, the MHA says, connect the Centre with State police when the forces deploy in States.
    3. Deputation paradox: The Centre itself struggles to fill IPS-reserved posts because States are reluctant to release officers on central deputation.
    4. Listing controversy: The contempt cases were listed before Justices Ujjal Bhuyan and A S Chandurkar, then struck off. They went to a special Bench of Justices Manoj Misra and Bhuyan after the Centre asked the Chief Justice of India to club the two cases.
    5. Officers’ objection: CAPF officers’ lawyers argued that the two cases are distinct.

    Challenges

    1. Legislative override: Parliament may change the law a judgment rests on but cannot simply overrule the judgment, so the override clause invites a court challenge.
    2. Blocked promotions: Fixed top-level quotas keep cadre officers stagnating in middle ranks, hurting morale.
    3. Listing transparency: Striking a listed case off without stated reasons weakens confidence in the Registry.

    Way Forward

    1. Cadre review: The MHA should run a time-bound cadre review to add senior posts.
    2. Service-based progression: Frame Service Rules linking financial upgrades to total qualifying service, as cadre officers seek.
    3. Calibrated deputation: Restrict deputation to posts needing Centre-State coordination, with a published reduction schedule.
    4. Reasoned listing orders: The Registry should record reasons whenever a listed case is removed or a Bench reconstituted.

    Conclusion

    The contest has moved from service rules to whether Parliament can legislate around a judicial direction on who commands the forces. The joint hearing before one Bench will decide whether the Court’s earlier judgment survives.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2023, GS3, 15 marks] What are the internal security challenges being faced by India? Give out the role of Central Intelligence and Investigative Agencies tasked to counter such threats.”

  • Outbound force

    Why in the News

    US troops have left Iraq more than 23 years after the 2003 invasion, at a time when the US fights another war in the region, against Iran. The exit leaves a war-ravaged country with a weak government and powerful militias backed by a resurgent Iran, exposing the limits of regime-change wars in West Asia.

    Why did the US invade Iraq, and why did it take so long to leave?

    1. Stated grounds: The US invaded in March 2003, claiming Saddam Hussein’s regime held weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and harboured terrorist groups. The WMD claim proved false.
    2. Reversed withdrawal: US President Barack Obama announced withdrawal in 2011. Troops returned when the Islamic State captured large territory in Iraq and Syria.
    3. The takeaway: A war launched on a false premise ended as an exit forced by attacks, not by a completed mission.

    How did the invasion reshape Iraq?

    1. State collapse: The destruction of Saddam’s Ba’athist state, run by his Ba’ath Party, and the abrupt rise of Shia parties widened social divisions. The result was a civil war that killed hundreds of thousands of Iraqis.
    2. Rise of the Islamic State: Al-Qaeda in Iraq, one of al-Qaeda’s most violent branches, grew in post-war Iraq. It became the Islamic State by 2014 and spread terror across the region.
    3. State within the state: The Popular Mobilisation Forces (PMFs, or Hashad al-Shabi), an umbrella of Iran-backed Shia militias, now rival the Iraqi state’s authority.

    How did the war tilt the regional balance toward Iran?

    1. Lost buffer: Saddam’s Iraq was hostile to the Gulf monarchies but still served as a buffer between them and Iran.
    2. Iranian reach: After the regime fell, Iran extended its influence across Iraq through Shia parties and militias.
    3. Current war: Hashad joined the war after the US and Israel began bombing Iran on February 28. Iran and its allies have since made at least 600 attacks on US facilities in Iraq.
    4. Timing of the exit: The US is leaving Iraq just as it tries to defeat Iran in a major regional war. Iran and its allies have vowed to push the US out of West Asia.

    What does the exit say about regime-change wars?

    1. Afghanistan parallel: The US left Afghanistan after 20 years, handing it back to the same Taliban it toppled in 2001. Iraq is left to a weak government and Iran-backed militias.
    2. Regional fallout: Regime-change wars destabilised parts of West Asia and gave rise to militias and jihadists.
    3. Limits of power: Keeping troops in Iraq became unsustainable under militia attacks, so the US leaves worn out, if not defeated.

    Challenges

    1. Militia dominance: Armed groups outside state control can override an elected government in Baghdad.
    2. Jihadist revival: A security vacuum can let Islamic State remnants regroup.
    3. Iranian proxy network: Iran-backed groups can widen the regional war from Iraqi soil.
    4. Energy exposure: Instability threatens oil supply to importers like India. Eg. Iraq is among India’s largest crude suppliers.

    Way Forward

    1. Unified command: Baghdad should bring the PMFs under a single civilian chain of command.
    2. Regional dialogue: Gulf states and Iran should keep channels open to limit escalation. Eg. The 2023 Saudi Arabia-Iran normalisation.
    3. Supply diversification: India should spread crude sourcing and keep evacuation plans ready for its nationals in West Asia.

    Conclusion

    The US exit closes an occupation but leaves Iraq’s central question unresolved: whether an elected state or Iran-backed militias hold real power. How Baghdad handles the PMFs as the US-Iran war continues will decide whether Iraq stabilises or becomes the war’s next front.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2024] Consider the following pairs: Country Reason for being in the news 1. Argentina Worst economic crisis 2. Sudan War between the country’s regular army and paramilitary forces 3. Turkey Rescinded its membership of NATO How many of the pairs given above are correctly matched? (a) Only one pair (b) Only two pairs* (c) All three pairs (d) None of the pairs Answer: B”

More posts