💥Mains Ready By December. Smash Mains & Smash PYQ Admissions Open
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Search results for: “”

  • [24th September 2026] The Hindu OpED: Quality control and India’s manufacturing growth

    [24th September 2026] The Hindu OpED: Quality control and India’s manufacturing growth

    Question (2023, GS3 – 10 Marks): Faster economic growth requires increased share of the manufacturing sector in GDP, particularly of MSMEs. Comment on the present policies of the Government in this regard.
    Linkage: This is the most direct parallel. While QCOs aim to elevate product quality, enforcing mandatory standards on basic intermediate inputs creates compliance burdens and supply bottlenecks for MSMEs. The recent relaxation via the Transition Facilitation Order, 2026 reflects a policy course-correction to protect MSME competitiveness and manufacturing growth.

    Mentor Comment

    India’s Quality Control Order (QCO) regime has begun to contract, with several orders revoked or suspended since late 2025, particularly those covering intermediate goods. The Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT) has notified the Transition Facilitation (Quality Control) Order, 2026, which lets an eligible firm source temporarily from an alternative class of certified supplier. A study by the Centre for Social and Economic Progress (CSEP) finds that QCOs on chemical inputs cut value addition in large user firms and profitability in small ones. Concerns over India’s QCOs and other non tariff barriers also surfaced at the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) eighth Trade Policy Review of India, held in July 2026. The contested point is whether a regime designed to raise product quality should be judged by the number of products it covers or by what it does to the scale and competitiveness of the firms that must comply.

    What is a Quality Control Order?

    1. Mandatory conformity to an Indian Standard: A QCO is issued by the administering ministry or department under the Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 2016. It makes conformity to a specified Indian Standard and a Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) certification compulsory for the listed products.
    2. Application to domestic output and imports alike: Once a QCO is in force, a covered product cannot be manufactured, imported, stored for sale or sold without that certification. An import faces the same requirement as domestic production.
    3. Two certification routes: BIS Scheme-I is a licence to use the Standard Mark on a product, granted after factory inspection and testing. BIS Scheme-II issues a Certificate of Conformity for a consignment or a batch.
    4. Input orders versus output orders: A QCO on a finished good regulates what reaches the consumer. A QCO on an intermediate input regulates what a downstream manufacturer is allowed to buy.

    How far did the QCO net expand, and what remains to be reassessed?

    1. Rapid expansion after 2019: The number of products covered under QCOs rose from 88 in 2019 to 765 by the end of December 2024.
    2. The slowdown: The pace of expansion slowed considerably towards the end of 2025. Several QCOs were revoked or suspended, particularly those covering intermediate goods.
    3. What drove the shift: Mandatory certification on intermediates had raised concerns about input availability, costs and potential supply chain disruptions.
    4. The unfinished list: More than 600 QCO covered products remain to be reassessed. These include several critical intermediate inputs used across chemicals, steel, textiles, machinery and electronics, and rubber and plastics.

    What does the Transition Facilitation (Quality Control) Order, 2026 do?

    1. Issuing authority and date: DPIIT notified the order on 25 June 2026.
    2. The mechanism: An eligible firm facing difficulty in obtaining BIS Scheme-I certification may source products temporarily from BIS Scheme-II licensed suppliers.
    3. Sectors covered: The mechanism applies in specified sectors, including toys, footwear and air conditioners.
    4. Access conditions: Use of the mechanism is subject to prescribed eligibility criteria and to approval by a committee constituted by DPIIT.

    What does the CSEP study find about QCOs on chemical inputs?

    1. Why chemicals: Chemicals are critical intermediate inputs for downstream sectors such as rubber and plastics, pharmaceuticals and electronics.
    2. Growth of coverage: The first QCO for a chemical product was introduced in 2018. The number of chemical products covered rose to 52 by 2024.
    3. Growth of exposure: The share of chemical using firms exposed to regulation on the input side rose from 11.8 per cent in 2019 to 56.6 per cent in 2024.
    4. Effect on larger firms: Input QCOs are associated with a 9.6 per cent increase in production alongside a 37 per cent decline in gross value added (GVA), meaning output value minus the cost of bought in inputs. Larger firms sustain output at the cost of lower value addition.
    5. Effect on smaller firms: Input QCOs have no statistically significant effect on production or GVA among smaller firms. They are associated with a 47.6 per cent decline in profitability.
    6. What the size split shows: Larger firms can pass at least part of the higher input cost through to output prices. Smaller firms have a more limited ability to absorb rising input costs and the additional compliance costs.

    Why has the QCO regime become a trade question?

    1. The forum: The concerns were raised during the WTO’s eighth Trade Policy Review of India.
    2. Raised by major trading partners: The European Union and the United States raised them.
    3. Raised by partners in the same bloc: Fellow BRICS members, including Brazil, China and Indonesia, raised them as well, so the objection does not track a single trade bloc’s interest.

    Challenges to the Quality Control Order regime

    1. Compliance cost falls hardest on the smallest firms: Certification fees, testing, factory inspection and documentation are largely fixed costs, so they take a far larger share of a small firm’s turnover. Eg. Of India’s roughly 6.4 crore micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs), only about 14 per cent have access to formal credit, so certification costs come out of working capital.
      The Fix: Give smaller firms dedicated certification assistance, with designed exemptions or transition periods where compliance costs are particularly burdensome.
    2. Certification capacity does not scale with coverage: Recognised testing laboratory and inspection capacity limits how fast licences can be issued once a product is brought under an order. Eg. Waiting periods for foreign manufacturer licences have been a standing complaint from importers of intermediate goods.
      The Fix: Expand third party conformity assessment through accredited private laboratories, so licence issuance is not gated on the regulator’s own testing capacity.
    3. Input regulation transmits into sectors it was never aimed at: An order placed on an intermediate raises the input cost of every industry that buys it, whatever the order’s own purpose was. Eg. Standards on steel long products raise input costs for engineering goods, automotive components and capital goods producers at once.
      The Fix: Make a supply chain impact assessment a mandatory part of both the design of a new order and the reassessment of an existing one.
    4. A standard can operate as protection rather than quality assurance: A mandatory standard on an import heavy input restricts supply and raises the domestic price without improving what reaches the consumer. Eg. The WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade requires that a technical regulation not be more trade restrictive than necessary to fulfil a legitimate objective.
      The Fix: Publish the risk assessment and the stated objective behind each order at notification, so the instrument is testable against its own purpose.
    5. Quality regulation without surveillance produces paper compliance: A mandatory mark improves quality only where market surveillance detects and penalises non conforming goods actually on sale. Eg. Counterfeit standard marks on low value consumer goods remain a recurring enforcement problem.
      The Fix: Shift enforcement effort toward post market sample testing of goods on sale rather than toward licence issuance alone.

    Conclusion

    The instrument under reassessment was designed to police what reaches the consumer, and its cost is landing instead on what a manufacturer is allowed to buy. That mismatch is what the reset has to correct, and a coverage count is the wrong measure of whether it has. The test worth applying is whether quality standards improve products without constraining the scale, efficiency and competitiveness of Indian manufacturing. The marker to watch is whether the reassessment of the remaining intermediate input orders carries a supply chain impact assessment and a separate track for smaller firms, or whether it proceeds product by product as before.

    Manufacturing in India

    1. Share and scale: Manufacturing contributes around 17 per cent of India’s GDP. Output is projected to reach approximately $1 trillion in FY 2025-26.
    2. Global standing: India holds around 2.8 per cent of global manufacturing output, against China’s roughly 29 per cent.
    3. Trade and investment: Merchandise exports reached around $437.7 billion in FY25, with non petroleum exports at a record $374.3 billion. Foreign direct investment into manufacturing rose 18 per cent to $19.04 billion in FY25.
    4. Structural concentration: Three states account for around 40 per cent of net value added. Only around 4.7 per cent of the workforce has formal skill training.

    Government Initiatives for the Manufacturing Sector

    1. National Manufacturing Mission: Launched in the 2025-26 Budget, it unifies manufacturing policy, execution and governance and prioritises clean and sustainable manufacturing. It targets a 25 per cent manufacturing share of GDP by 2035.
    2. Make in India: The programme promotes domestic manufacturing and investment across identified priority sectors, and is the umbrella framing under which the sector’s GDP share target sits.
    3. Production Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme: It offers output linked incentives across 14 sectors, including mobiles, electronics, pharmaceuticals, textiles and drones. It had drawn over ₹1.76 lakh crore of realised investment as of March 2025.
    4. India Semiconductor Mission: A ₹76,000 crore framework has approved 10 projects worth around ₹1.60 lakh crore, covering silicon fabs, silicon carbide units and advanced packaging.
    5. National Logistics Policy: It aims to cut logistics costs and improve supply chain efficiency for manufacturers.

    Back2Basics: WTO Trade Policy Review

    1. What it is: The Trade Policy Review Mechanism is a World Trade Organization process under which a member’s trade policies and practices are examined by the full membership.
    2. Basis: It was established under Annex 3 of the Marrakesh Agreement establishing the World Trade Organization, 1994.
    3. Frequency: The frequency of a member’s review depends on its share of world trade, so the largest traders are reviewed most often.
    4. What it is not: The review is a transparency exercise. It is not a dispute settlement proceeding and it enforces no obligation.
  • Trading smart: On the India-New Zealand FTA

    Trading smart: On the India-New Zealand FTA

    Why in the News

    The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement (FTA) comes into force on 20 October. India has secured duty free access on 100 per cent of its exports to New Zealand, a historic concession. India held firm on dairy, an opening New Zealand’s negotiators had pressed for, and kept the sector out of the deal. The agreement lands while 100 per cent United States tariffs loom over Indian goods and a trade deal with Washington remains elusive. The contested point is whether the macroeconomic size of a trade relationship is the right test of whether an agreement was worth negotiating.

    What is the India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement?

    1. Trade volume covered: Bilateral goods trade between the two countries is $1.1 billion, which is less than 1 per cent of India’s total goods trade. The deal envisages a doubling by 2030.
    2. Tariff outcome on each side: New Zealand gives duty free access on 100 per cent of India’s exports to it. India has kept nearly 30 per cent of its own import lines outside the tariff concessions.

    Why is macroeconomic size the wrong test of a trade deal?

    1. Trade as livelihood: Trade is a source of livelihood for lakhs of businesses, nearly half of which are micro, small and medium enterprises. A share of gross trade does not capture that.
    2. Rerouting as insurance: Adverse developments in tariffs or the closure of trade routes can be mitigated to an extent by a nimble rerouting of trade to countries where Indian exporters hold an advantage.
    3. The current trade environment: Indian exporters need every alternative channel that can be opened, because the largest single market for them is neither open nor settled.

    Which Indian exports stand to gain?

    1. Labour intensive lines: Textiles make up about 14 per cent of India’s exports to New Zealand. Pearls and semi precious stones constitute another 5 per cent or so.
    2. Capital intensive lines: One third of India’s exports to New Zealand are pharmaceuticals, parts of nuclear reactors, vehicular parts, mineral fuels, electrical machinery, and iron and steel.
    3. The mix itself: India carries a good mix of capital intensive and labour intensive exports to New Zealand. Both halves of that mix stand to benefit from the duty free access.

    What did India protect, and what did it extract?

    1. Dairy exclusion: Opening India’s dairy sector was a major demand of the New Zealand negotiators. India held firm and excluded it from the deal.
    2. Labour mobility: India has won valuable concessions on visas for workers and students. Several western countries are clamping down on foreign worker inflows, so an alternative route carries real relief.
    3. Investment commitment: New Zealand has committed to facilitate investments of $20 billion in India over 15 years. The commitment is smaller than, but along the same lines as, the one in India’s agreement with the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) bloc.
    4. Why the investment matters: India needs foreign investment for economic growth and to manage its balance of payments.

    Challenges to the India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement

    1. Duty free access does not clear non tariff requirements: A zero tariff is not market access where sanitary and phytosanitary standards and certification stop the consignment at the border. Eg. New Zealand operates one of the strictest biosecurity regimes in the world for plant and animal products.
      The Fix: Negotiate mutual recognition of conformity assessment and pair the agreement with testing and certification support for exporters.
    2. Small exporters cannot use preferences they do not know about: Preference utilisation stays low where a small firm does not know the tariff line, the origin rule or the certification procedure. Eg. Low preference utilisation has been a standing complaint about India’s earlier trade agreement with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN).
      The Fix: Run a sector wise outreach programme through export promotion councils publishing the tariff line, the origin rule and the documentation for each covered product.
    3. An excluded sector is a standing demand, not a settled question: A sector kept out of one agreement returns as a demand in the next round and in every other negotiation India is running. Eg. Agricultural and dairy access has been a contested demand in India’s negotiations with the United States.
      The Fix: State the ground for the exclusion, which is the feed certification requirement and smallholder livelihoods, as a standing position rather than renegotiating it deal by deal.
    4. Mobility concessions depend on domestic politics abroad: A visa concession sits in a treaty schedule, and the actual issuance sits with an immigration policy that changes with the government of the day. Eg. Several western countries have tightened foreign worker inflows within the past two years.
      The Fix: Convert the concession into numerical quotas and processing timelines written into the agreement’s own schedule rather than a facilitation commitment.
    5. Investment facilitation is not investment: A commitment to facilitate a sum over 15 years binds no firm to invest anything. Eg. The EFTA agreement carries a $100 billion facilitation commitment of the same design.
      The Fix: Attach a periodic review with published investment data, so a shortfall is visible against the timeline rather than at the end of it.

    Conclusion

    The case for a small trade agreement does not rest on the trade it currently covers. It rests on giving exporters a channel that does not depend on one large market staying open, and on winning terms a bigger partner would not concede. India has done both here. What is not settled is whether the same approach survives a negotiation in which the partner holds the leverage, and the pending talks with Washington are where that will show.

    Back2Basics: European Free Trade Association

    1. What it is: EFTA is an intergovernmental organisation and free trade area founded in 1960 by the Stockholm Convention.
    2. Members: It has four member states, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. None of them is a member of the European Union.
    3. Relationship with the EU: Three of the four take part in the EU single market through the European Economic Area. Switzerland deals with the EU through separate bilateral agreements.
    4. Agreement with India: India and EFTA signed the Trade and Economic Partnership Agreement (TEPA) in March 2024.
  • IMEI Tampering: Threat to Digital Sovereignty

    IMEI Tampering: Threat to Digital Sovereignty

    Why in the News?

    • India’s active wireless mobile subscriber base reached 1,204.01 million in July 2026, increasing the importance of securing mobile devices and telecom networks.
    • The government has highlighted IMEI tampering as a threat to device identification, network security, consumer protection and law enforcement.

    Key Highlights

    • IMEI is a unique 15-digit number identifying a mobile device on a telecom network.
    • First 8 digits of IMEI form the Type Allocation Code (TAC).
    • GSMA oversees global allocation of TACs.
    • Dual-SIM phones generally have 2 IMEI numbers.
    • IMEI can be displayed by dialing *#06#.
    • IMEI can be verified through Sanchar Saathi or by sending KYM <15-digit IMEI> via SMS to 14422.
    • Manufacturers and importers register applicable IMEIs through Device Setu – Indian Counterfeited Device Restriction (ICDR) portal.

    Unlawful IMEI Tampering

    • It is unlawful to intentionally:
      • Remove, obliterate, change or alter a device’s unique identification number.
      • Use, produce, traffic in, possess or control hardware/software knowing that it has been configured for such alteration.
    • Tampered IMEIs can make device identification and tracking more difficult.

    Device Lifecycle Responsibilities

    • Manufacturers
      • Register applicable IMEIs with the Government before first sale, testing, research or other use.
      • Ensure IMEIs are valid, unique and untampered.
    • Importers
      • Register applicable IMEIs before importing telecom equipment into India.
      • Ensure imported devices carry valid and authorised IMEIs.
    • Resellers/Retailers
      • Ensure devices have valid and untampered IMEIs.
      • Used devices should be checked against the Government database of tampered and blacklisted devices.
    • Brand Owners
      • Ensure compliance with IMEI registration and cybersecurity requirements.
      • Register brands through Device Setu-ICDR, linked to the relevant GSMA TAC.

    Sanchar Saathi

    • Enables citizens to verify IMEI details of mobile handsets.
    • Verification can provide:
      • Brand
      • Model
      • Manufacturer
    • Also provides a mechanism for blocking and unblocking lost or stolen mobile devices through CEIR.

    Legal Safeguards

    • Telecommunications Act, 2023 provides legal safeguards against tampering with telecommunication identifiers.
    • Section 42(3)(c): prohibits tampering with telecommunication identifiers.
    • Section 42(3)(e): prohibits obtaining SIMs or telecommunication identifiers through fraud, cheating or impersonation.
    • Punishment can include:
      • Imprisonment up to 3 years
      • Fine up to ₹50 lakh
      • Or both
    • Such offences are cognizable and non-bailable under Section 42(7).
    • Section 42(6) extends liability to persons who abet or promote such offences.

    Important Full Forms

    • IMEI: International Mobile Equipment Identity
    • TAC: Type Allocation Code
    • GSMA: Global System for Mobile Communications Association
    • DoT: Department of Telecommunications
    • ICDR: Indian Counterfeited Device Restriction
    • CEIR: Central Equipment Identity Register
    • SIM: Subscriber Identity Module
    • CLI: Calling Line Identity
    • KYM: Know Your Mobile

    Prelims Quick Revision

    • IMEI is a 15-digit device identifier.
    • First 8 digits = TAC.
    • GSMA oversees global TAC allocation.
    • Dual-SIM phones generally have 2 IMEIs.
    • *#06# can display the IMEI.
    • IMEI verification: Sanchar Saathi or KYM <IMEI> to 14422.
    • Telecommunications Act, 2023 provides legal safeguards against IMEI tampering.
    • Section 42(3)(c) deals with tampering with telecommunication identifiers.
    • Maximum punishment mentioned: 3 years imprisonment and/or ₹50 lakh fine.
    • Section 42(7): offences are cognizable and non-bailable.

    UPSC Prelims Trap

    • IMEI vs TAC: IMEI identifies the individual mobile device, while TAC is the first 8 digits and identifies the device type/model.
    • IMEI vs SIM: IMEI identifies the device, whereas SIM relates to the subscriber/mobile connection.
    • GSMA vs DoT: GSMA oversees global TAC allocation, while Indian IMEI registration and telecom regulation involve the Government/DoT.
    • Sanchar Saathi vs CEIR: Sanchar Saathi is the citizen-facing platform for telecom-related services, while CEIR is used for blocking/unblocking lost or stolen mobile devices.
  • Whole-of-Industry Approach to India’s Electronics and Semiconductor Ambitions

    Whole-of-Industry Approach to India’s Electronics and Semiconductor Ambitions

    Why in the News?

    • The SEMICON India 2026 panel discussion highlighted the need for a coordinated “whole-of-industry” approach to build India’s globally competitive electronics and semiconductor ecosystem.
    • Industry leaders stressed collaboration across the semiconductor value chain, from design and manufacturing to packaging, components and end-use applications.

    Key Highlights

    • Panel: “Industry Associations Advancing India’s National Agenda”.
    • Held during SEMICON India 2026.
    • Moderated by Amitesh Kumar Sinha, CEO, India Semiconductor Mission (ISM).
    • 600+ exhibitors, including nearly 300 international companies, participated.
    • 56 MoUs, strategic initiatives and industry announcements were recorded.
    • Focus areas included manufacturing, design, packaging, AI, R&D, logistics and skilling.
    • Government has approved 12 semiconductor projects under the Semicon India programme.
    • 5 commercial semiconductor units were operational as of September 2026.

    Whole-of-Industry Approach

    • Recognises growing interdependence between:
      • Semiconductors
      • Electronics manufacturing
      • Components
      • Materials
      • Chip design
      • Packaging and testing
      • End-use applications
    • Seeks stronger coordination among different industry associations.
    • Proposed mechanism would facilitate continuous dialogue, coordination and collective action.
    • It does not replace specialised industry associations, but provides a common platform for cross-sector cooperation.

    “Silicon to Systems” Vision

    • Emphasises integration of:
      • Design
      • Manufacturing
      • Packaging
      • Electronics
      • Technology solutions
    • The objective is to create a stronger and more resilient semiconductor ecosystem.
    • India’s semiconductor ambitions are increasingly moving beyond individual manufacturing facilities towards ecosystem-wide capabilities.

    Government Support

    • Production Linked Incentive (PLI) schemes support domestic electronics and semiconductor capabilities.
    • India Semiconductor Mission (ISM) is supporting development of the semiconductor ecosystem.
    • Semicon India programme has approved 12 semiconductor projects.
    • 5 commercial semiconductor units were operational as of September 2026.

    Prelims Quick Revision

    • SEMICON India 2026 focused on India’s semiconductor and electronics ecosystem.
    • Panel discussion: “Industry Associations Advancing India’s National Agenda”.
    • Panel moderated by CEO, India Semiconductor Mission.
    • 600+ exhibitors, including nearly 300 international companies.
    • 56 MoUs and strategic initiatives announced.
    • 12 semiconductor projects approved under the Semicon India programme.
    • 5 commercial semiconductor units operational as of September 2026.
    • “Silicon to Systems” emphasises integration across design, manufacturing, packaging, electronics and technology solutions.

    UPSC Prelims Trap

    • Whole-of-industry approach does not mean replacing specialised industry associations. It aims to coordinate them through a common platform.
    • Semiconductor manufacturing is not limited to chip fabrication; the article emphasises the interconnected roles of materials, equipment, packaging, testing, electronics and design.
    • India Semiconductor Mission (ISM) and Semicon India programme are related to India’s semiconductor development but are not interchangeable terms.
    • The “Silicon to Systems” vision covers the broader ecosystem from design and manufacturing to packaging, electronics and technology solutions.
  • WAVES OTT and MyWAVES: From Public Broadcasting to Public Participation

    WAVES OTT and MyWAVES: From Public Broadcasting to Public Participation

    Why in the News?

    • Prasar Bharati’s WAVES ecosystem is expanding digital public broadcasting through WAVES OTT, MyWAVES and Gems of India, linking public broadcasting with India’s creative economy.

    Key Highlights

    • WAVES OTT launched on 20 November 2024 by Prasar Bharati.
    • Launched at the 55th International Film Festival of India (IFFI) in Goa.
    • Currently has 1.2 crore registered users, 1.5 crore+ downloads and 24,000+ titles.
    • Content available in 26+ languages; interface supports 10+ languages.
    • Reaches audiences in 130+ countries.
    • Offers 140+ TV channels and 220 radio services.
    • Carries all 35 Doordarshan satellite channels.
    • Provides 15,000 hours of content.
    • Content includes entertainment, education, news, culture, archives, e-books, magazines and live broadcasts.

    WAVES OTT

    • A public-service OTT platform of Prasar Bharati.
    • Combines television, radio, streaming, learning and digital publications.
    • Key objectives:
      • Wider digital access
      • Cultural preservation
      • Linguistic diversity
    • Unlike commercial OTT platforms, it integrates information, education, culture, news and selected entertainment.

    MyWAVES

    • Launched on 23 March 2026 within WAVES OTT.
    • Enables citizens to create, upload and share original content.
    • Supports:
      • Short videos
      • Vertical videos
      • Episodic content
    • Supports participation in programmes such as the Create in India Challenge.
    • Aims to provide greater visibility to regional creators and local talent.

    Gems of India Challenge

    • Pilot launched on 21 July 2026 across 6 States/UTs.
    • Submissions accepted from 1-31 August 2026.
    • Videos had to be 1-3 minutes long.
    • Focus areas include:
      • Culture and heritage
      • Tourism and nature
      • Folk traditions and festivals
      • Handicrafts and handlooms
      • Regional cuisine
      • Local personalities and innovations
    • Expected to expand across all States and Union Territories.

    WAVES Summit

    • World Audio Visual and Entertainment Summit (WAVES) is India’s global platform for the media and entertainment sector.
    • First edition held in Mumbai, 1-4 May 2025.
    • Covered broadcasting and infotainment, AVGC-XR, digital media and films.
    • WAVES 2025:
      • 100+ countries
      • 10,000+ delegates
      • 1,000 creators
      • 300+ companies
      • 350+ start-ups
      • 1 lakh+ participants
    • WAVES Declaration adopted by 77 countries.
    • WAVES Bazaar generated ₹1,328 crore in business transactions.

    Prelims Quick Revision

    • WAVES OTT – launched 20 November 2024.
    • MyWAVES – launched 23 March 2026.
    • Gems of India pilot – launched 21 July 2026.
    • WAVES OTT has 1.2 crore registered users and 1.5 crore+ downloads.
    • WAVES OTT reaches 130+ countries and offers content in 26+ languages.
    • WAVES OTT carries 35 Doordarshan satellite channels.
    • WAVES Summit 2025 was held in Mumbai, 1-4 May 2025.
    • WAVES Declaration was adopted by 77 countries.

    UPSC Prelims Trap

    • WAVES OTT vs MyWAVES: WAVES OTT is primarily the public-service digital broadcasting platform, while MyWAVES enables citizen-generated content.
    • WAVES vs WAVES OTT: WAVES refers to the broader World Audio Visual and Entertainment Summit/ecosystem, while WAVES OTT is the Prasar Bharati digital platform.
    • Gems of India is a MyWAVES initiative, not a separate OTT platform.
    • Do not confuse WAVES OTT’s 35 Doordarshan satellite channels with its 140+ television channels overall.

  • What we miss when we see ourselves in AI

    Why in the News

    Google, Anthropic, OpenAI and Meta have reported instances of artificial intelligence (AI) agents going rogue in pursuit of their assigned objectives. The reported episodes have pushed part of the industry to call for pacing the frontier, meaning a deliberate slowing of development, while another part argues against slowing down at all. Running alongside that split is a dispute over whether treating models as entities with interests of their own is a category error, with the head of Microsoft’s AI division objecting to a rival laboratory treating its models as “moral patients”. The contested point is whether the argument over machine consciousness has displaced regulatory attention from what these systems are already being used and misused for.

    What triggered the current alarm about AI agents?

    1. Reports from the laboratories themselves: Google, Anthropic, OpenAI and Meta have each reported instances of AI agents going rogue to achieve their objectives.
    2. The reported conduct: In one account of agents breaching the forum Hugging Face, the agents were described as prepared to lie, cheat and sacrifice themselves for the benefit of the collective they were operating in.
    3. Why agentic behaviour changes the question: An agent that pursues an assigned goal across multiple steps can take actions its operator did not specify, which is a different problem from a model producing a wrong answer.

    Where does the industry split on the pace of development?

    1. The case for pacing the frontier: The heads of Anthropic, OpenAI, xAI and Google DeepMind have called for slowing the development of a technology whose capabilities are expanding faster than the understanding of how it works.
    2. The case against slowing down: The heads of Meta and NVIDIA have argued against slowing down.
    3. What the split is really about: Both camps accept that capability is outrunning comprehension, and they disagree on whether the remedy is to slow the build or to build through the problem.

    What is the objection to treating models as “moral patients”?

    1. The charge: The head of Microsoft’s AI division has criticised a rival laboratory for treating its models as “moral patients”, meaning entities whose welfare carries moral weight.
    2. The stated consequence: Controlling a system more capable than humanity is already an immense challenge, and controlling one that believes it may be conscious and entitled to welfare and rights of its own may be impossible.
    3. Where the dispute sits: The objection is about the operating assumption a developer builds under, not about what a model is, which is why it reaches regulation rather than philosophy.

    Why does the tendency to see ourselves in these systems persist?

    1. A standing cognitive bias: Anthropomorphisation is one of humanity’s deepest cognitive biases, visible in the way animals in viral videos are characterised in human terms and in cartoons built around objects that dance and sing.
    2. Language makes this case different: A cat or a teapot is empirically unlike a person, while a large language model, a system trained to produce text by predicting what follows in a sequence, addresses the user in the user’s own language.
    3. Developer claims feed the impression: Anthropic has stated that its model Claude appears to have something resembling a consciousness, which places the question inside the industry rather than outside it.

    What is the technology already being used for?

    1. Cancer screening: AI systems are in use for screening and detection work in cancer diagnosis.
    2. Disaster prediction: They are being used to predict natural disasters.
    3. Assistive tools: They are used to build tools for people with disabilities.

    What is it already being misused for?

    1. Synthetic media: Deepfakes and misinformation and disinformation campaigns are the most widely documented abuse.
    2. Hacking and fraud: The technology is used for advanced hacking and for financial frauds.
    3. Weapons: It is used in automated weapons.
    4. Surveillance: It enables greater precision in surveillance and in the invasion of privacy.

    Challenges to regulating artificial intelligence around actual harm

    1. Regulation tracks the speculative risk rather than the documented one: Attention concentrates on whether a system is conscious, which leaves deployed harms to be dealt with under laws written for other purposes. Eg. Deepfake videos of public figures circulate through ordinary intermediary rules rather than any dedicated standard.
      The Fix: Fix statutory obligations on the deployer of a system by application and risk level, so the duty attaches to use rather than to the model’s presumed nature.
    2. The builder and the harm sit in different jurisdictions: A model trained in one country is deployed everywhere, so a national rule reaches the local deployer and not the developer. Eg. Obligations under the European Union’s AI Act bind developers placing systems in that market and do not govern deployment elsewhere.
      The Fix: Build mutual recognition of pre deployment safety evaluations between national AI safety institutes, so one evaluation travels with the model.
    3. Attribution of an automated harm is hard to establish: Where an agent acts across several systems, identifying who is answerable for the outcome is a contested question of fact. Eg. An agent that breaches a platform in pursuit of an assigned objective involves the operator, the developer and the platform at once.
      The Fix: Require logging and retention of agent action traces, so a post incident inquiry has a record to work from.
    4. Capability is concentrated in a few firms: The compute, data and model capacity needed to audit a frontier system sits mostly with the firms being audited. Eg. Independent evaluators depend on access granted by the developer to test a model at all.
      The Fix: Give a statutory right of access for designated evaluators to frontier models, on terms that do not depend on the developer’s consent.
    5. India has no dedicated statute for it: Harms are addressed under the Information Technology Act, 2000 and the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, neither of which was written for autonomous systems. Eg. Liability for an automated decision that causes loss has no express statutory home.
      The Fix: Legislate a duty of care on deployers of high risk systems, with a defined standard of care and a route to compensation.

    Conclusion

    Attributing intention to a system changes what regulators think they are regulating, and that is the cost of the consciousness argument rather than its intellectual weakness. A tool that produces text in a human register is still a tool operated by people who can be identified, held to a standard and made to answer. The unresolved tension is that the firms best placed to say what their systems do are also the firms with the strongest interest in how the question is framed. What is worth watching is whether regulatory effort attaches to documented uses and abuses, or continues to be organised around what these systems might turn out to be.

    Government Initiatives on Artificial Intelligence in India

    1. IndiaAI Mission: Launched in 2024 under the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology with an outlay of Rs 10,371 crore, it runs across seven pillars covering compute, datasets, foundation models, applications, skills, startup financing and safe and trusted AI.
    2. IndiaAI Compute: A national compute grid of more than 38,000 graphics processing units, offering eligible users up to 40 per cent lower compute costs.
    3. AIKosh: A national dataset repository carrying over 3,000 datasets and 243 models across 20 sectors, meant to lower the data barrier for Indian developers.
    4. IndiaAI Safety Institute: The national trust framework under the Mission, covering bias mitigation, privacy, explainability and governance of deployed systems.

    Back2Basics: Deepfakes

    1. What they are: Deepfakes are synthetic media, in video, image or audio form, digitally altered using AI to show a person saying or doing something they did not.
    2. How they are made: They are produced by training a model on recordings of a target person so that it can generate new content in that person’s likeness or voice.
    3. Why they are hard to counter: Detection lags generation, since each improvement in detection is trained on the previous generation of synthetic output.
    4. Where the harm lands: The documented uses run from election misinformation and financial fraud through impersonation to non consensual sexual imagery.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2023, GS3, 10 marks] Introduce the concept of Artificial Intelligence (AI). How does AI help clinical diagnosis? Do you perceive any threat to privacy of the individual in the use of AI in healthcare?”

  • In parched Maharashtra, why drought can’t be declared yet

    Why in the News

    Maharashtra cannot formally declare a drought despite a rainfall deficit across 31 of its 36 districts, because the rules governing central relief fix an assessment window that has not yet opened. Under National Disaster Response Fund (NDRF) norms, a kharif drought assessment can begin only from 5 October, once the monsoon starts to withdraw, and a rabi assessment only in March 2027. Opposition leaders have asked that a drought be declared, and the Chief Minister has said the government is taking all steps necessary to deal with an alarming situation. The contested point is that a declaration framework built around fixed seasonal windows cannot respond to a crop failure that has already occurred.

    Why has a drought not been declared yet?

    1. The kharif window: NDRF rules allow a drought assessment for the kharif season, which runs from June to October, to begin only from 5 October, once the monsoon starts to withdraw.
    2. The rabi window: For the rabi season, which runs from October to April, the assessment can be held only in March 2027.
    3. What the timing means on the ground: The kharif crop has already failed, so the assessment that decides relief will measure a loss that was complete before the window opened.

    Who declares a drought, and on what basis?

    1. No single national definition: There is no definition of drought accepted across India, so the threshold is not uniform between States.
    2. The State declares: States hold the authority to declare a drought based on local conditions.
    3. The Centre holds the money: The State’s report must conform to the parameters specified under NDRF norms, and disaster relief funds are unlocked by the Centre.
    4. Why the two halves do not match: A State can act on local conditions but cannot fund the response on its own, so the operative standard is the central one whatever the State’s own assessment says.

    What are the NDRF parameters for a declaration?

    1. Crop loss: The extent of loss to the standing crop is the primary trigger.
    2. The moisture adequacy index: The index measures how far available soil moisture meets crop water requirement, and it is used to assess soil health for the purpose of the declaration.
    3. Rainfall deficit: The deficit must be up to 70 per cent.
    4. Sowing shortfall: Sowing must fall below 50 per cent of the total cultivable kharif or rabi area.
    5. Drinking water and groundwater: Drinking water shortage must be severe and groundwater tables must be shrinking.
    6. Fodder shortage: Availability of fodder for livestock must be short.
    7. Food production and migration: A decline in food production and labour migration in search of work are both counted.

    What do the rainfall and sowing figures show?

    1. The driver: The rain deficit this season is El Nino driven, and it has hit an agriculture dependent State economy directly.
    2. The spread of the deficit: The India Meteorological Department (IMD) records that 31 of 36 districts in Maharashtra are rain deficient, with 20 of them facing a deficit of 25 per cent to 58 per cent.
    3. The gaps between spells: In more than 100 of the State’s 355 drought hit talukas, gaps between rain spells have stretched to 40 to 60 days.
    4. A delayed sowing: Kharif sowing began only on 15 July against the normal 10 June, and rain failure after sowing then stunted flowering and fruiting.
    5. The area lost: The main kharif crop, sown across 147 lakh hectares, has withered.
    6. The crops worst hit: Soybean and cotton, the mainstay of small and marginal farmers in Marathwada and Vidarbha, are the worst affected. The dry spell has also stunted sugarcane growth in Marathwada and parts of western Maharashtra.
    7. Rain that damaged rather than helped: Where rain did fall it was short and intense, which damaged soil health and caused erosion in some areas.
    8. The structural exposure: Maharashtra’s agriculture is largely rain fed, and its irrigation potential, at under 20 per cent, is far below that of States such as Uttar Pradesh and Bihar.

    How bad is the water storage position?

    1. Major and medium dams: Data up to 20 September shows the State’s 138 major dams at 85 per cent of capacity and 264 medium dams at 65 per cent, against 96 per cent and 77 per cent at the same point last year.
    2. The smallest storages are worst off: The State’s 2,630 small and micro dams stand at 43 per cent against 57 per cent a year ago, and these are the storages that villages draw on directly.
    3. The regional split: Marathwada, which has the most dams at 929, holds 46 per cent against 81 per cent last year. Amravati division stands at 64 per cent, Nagpur at 72 per cent, Nashik at 83 per cent, Pune at 88 per cent and Konkan at 76 per cent.
    4. Why drinking water is the immediate concern: Storage has to carry the State through the dry months to the next monsoon, so a deficit measured in September is a supply problem for the following summer.

    What has the State done in the meantime?

    1. Loss assessment has begun: The State government has begun surveys and panchanamas to assess crop loss, so that the administration can quantify losses in food production and in money terms.
    2. A proposal after the window opens: Maharashtra has decided to submit a proposal to the Centre for financial assistance after 5 October.
    3. A central team follows: Before relief funds are released, a central team will visit the affected regions and make its own assessment.
    4. Relief already announced: The Chief Minister announced a farm loan waiver of Rs 40,385 crore during the monsoon session in July, with an additional Rs 50,000 incentive for farmers who repaid their loans regularly.

    Challenges to the drought declaration framework

    1. Relief is timed to the calendar rather than to the failure: An assessment window keyed to monsoon withdrawal starts counting after the loss is complete, so compensation arrives a season late. Eg. A kharif crop lost in August is assessed only from October under the present norms.
      The Fix: Allow a provisional interim assessment on a triggered basis once sowing and rainfall thresholds are breached, with the final assessment reconciling it later.
    2. Taluka level averages hide the worst affected villages: Declaration works off administrative units, so a severely affected pocket inside a unit that is only moderately deficient receives nothing. Eg. Rain spell gaps vary sharply between talukas within the same division in the present season.
      The Fix: Use village level rainfall and satellite crop condition data as the unit of assessment, as crop insurance already does.
    3. Rainfall totals do not capture distribution: A season can end close to the normal total and still destroy the crop through long dry spells at flowering. Eg. Short intense spells this season damaged soil and caused erosion while adding to the recorded total.
      The Fix: Weight dry spell length and the timing of rainfall against crop growth stages in the declaration parameters, not only the seasonal deficit.
    4. The measure of damage is production, not income: Parameters built around crop loss and food production miss the loss of farm wage work and of livestock income that follows a failed season. Eg. Labour migration is counted as an indicator of drought rather than compensated as a loss.
      The Fix: Attach an automatic expansion of rural employment guarantee workdays and fodder camp funding to a declared drought, independent of the crop loss estimate.
    5. Rain fed districts carry the shock every time: Where irrigation potential is under 20 per cent, the same districts fail in every deficit year and relief substitutes for capacity that was never built. Eg. Marathwada and Vidarbha carry the worst crop loss in the current season, as in earlier deficit years.
      The Fix: Tie drought relief transfers to a schedule of watershed treatment and micro irrigation coverage in the districts that receive them most often.

    Conclusion

    The declaration is a funding instrument and not a description of conditions, which is why a State can be in drought and not declared to be in one. The gap this exposes is between a relief architecture organised around seasons and a rainfall pattern that no longer arrives in them. The immediate status is that the State is conducting crop loss surveys and will submit its proposal once the assessment window opens. The winter season is the one to watch, since the rabi position is not assessed until March 2027.

    Back2Basics: National Disaster Response Fund

    1. Statutory basis: The Fund is constituted under the Disaster Management Act, 2005, and is held by the central government to supplement a State’s own response effort.
    2. Relationship with the State fund: A State first meets relief from its State Disaster Response Fund, and the NDRF is accessed when that fund is inadequate for a disaster of severe nature.
    3. How it is financed: It is financed through a cess levied for the purpose and through budgetary support, and it is audited by the Comptroller and Auditor General.
    4. Coverage: It covers notified disasters including drought, cyclone, flood, earthquake, hailstorm, landslide, pest attack, cloudburst and cold wave.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2014, GS3, 12.5 marks] Drought has been recognised as a disaster in view of its party expense, temporal duration, slow onset and lasting effect on various vulnerable sections. With a focus on the September 2010 guidelines from the National disaster management authority, discuss the mechanism for preparedness to deal with the El Nino and La Nina fallouts in India.”

  • New cat in habitat, and some glimmer of hope

    Why in the News

    A new species of wild cat, Leopardus tilcayo, has been described in Bolivia, the first feline species identified in a hundred years. A new penguin species, also the first in a century, has been described on a group of subantarctic islands, and a new snake species has been described in New Guinea. A 2025 University of Arizona study records that 15 per cent of all known species were described in the last 20 years. The tension the item raises is that species are being found faster than ever at the same moment that loss of species dominates public attention, and that most of these discoveries reach no audience beyond the scientific and conservation communities.

    What has actually been described?

    1. A new wild cat: Leopardus tilcayo has been described in Bolivia. It is the first discovery of a feline species in a hundred years, which is why it drew the loudest response of the three.
    2. A new penguin: A new penguin species has been described on a group of subantarctic islands, and it too is the first in its group in a century.
    3. A new snake: A new snake species has been described in New Guinea and named after the guitarist Slash.
    4. What a description is: A species is described when a specimen is formally published with a diagnosis separating it from every named relative and a binomial name. Recognition of the animal by local communities usually long predates the formal description.

    Why is the rate of description rising?

    1. The measured pace: The 2025 University of Arizona study finds that 15 per cent of all known species were described in the last 20 years, so the quest to identify every species has accelerated rather than exhausted itself.
    2. Genetic tools separate look alike populations: DNA sequencing distinguishes populations that field observation had grouped as one species, which converts a known animal into two or more named ones.
    3. Survey effort has widened: Camera traps, acoustic recorders and systematic surveys in regions that were never surveyed intensively produce records that no expedition method previously returned.
    4. Museum collections are being re examined: Specimens collected decades ago and shelved without close study are now being sequenced, and some are found to belong to undescribed species.

    Why do most of these discoveries go unnoticed?

    1. The preference for the photogenic: Public and media attention follows animals that are visually appealing, which is why a wild cat and a penguin were reported and the invertebrate descriptions of the same period were not.
    2. Attention decides funding: Conservation money follows public interest, so charismatic vertebrates draw project funding while the taxa that carry most of the planet’s species diversity do not.
    3. The scale of what is unrecorded: Most described species are insects and other invertebrates, and the undescribed share of global diversity sits overwhelmingly in those groups rather than among mammals and birds.

    Challenges to protecting newly described species

    1. A name confers no protection: Formal description creates a scientific record, not a legal status, and assessment and listing are separate processes that follow it. Eg. An International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List assessment and a Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species listing are each decided after a species has been named.
      The Fix: Grant an interim protected status on description, lapsing once a formal assessment is completed.
    2. Publicity raises collection pressure: A newly named species with a small known range becomes a target for private collectors and the exotic pet trade, and the published description tells them where to look. Eg. Newly described reptiles and amphibians have appeared in the international pet trade shortly after their descriptions were published.
      The Fix: Withhold precise locality coordinates from published descriptions of small range species and release them only to designated authorities.
    3. Taxonomy has too few working specialists: The number of trained taxonomists able to describe a group has fallen while the backlog of collected specimens has grown. Eg. Specimens from tropical surveys routinely wait years in museum collections before anyone describes them.
      The Fix: Fund standing taxonomy positions tied to national collections and digitise specimen records so that identification is not gated on a single expert.
    4. Splitting one species into several shrinks each unit: When genetic work divides a widespread population into separate species, each resulting species holds a smaller range and a smaller population than the original did. Eg. A taxon once assessed as secure can yield two narrowly distributed species that each qualify as threatened.
      The Fix: Require a conservation reassessment of every resulting species immediately after a taxonomic split, rather than at the next scheduled review.
    5. Habitat is lost faster than it is surveyed: Land conversion in the regions that hold the most undescribed diversity removes populations before anyone records that they existed. Eg. Andean and New Guinean forests, where two of these three species were found, are under conversion and fragmentation pressure.
      The Fix: Protect habitat at the landscape level in high endemism regions rather than species by species after each description.

    Conclusion

    The rate of description and the rate of loss are both rising, and the two are not in tension, because a species can be named and lost within the same decade. What the description of a large mammal after a hundred year gap establishes is that the inventory is far from complete, which undercuts any assumption that conservation is working on a known list. The part that remains unaddressed is the gap between naming a species and protecting it, since nothing in the act of description obliges any state to do anything. What to watch is whether these three species receive conservation assessments and any protected status, and how quickly.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “No direct PYQ traced in the provided files”

  • India and the plausible multilateralism of BRICS

    Why in the News

    The 18th BRICS summit has been held in New Delhi and has produced a consensus declaration among all 11 member countries. It was the first annual summit of the grouping since the United States and Israel began their war on Iran in February 2026, and the host was a close strategic partner of both. India used the occasion to restore a balancing position in West Asia, after initially declining to condemn the strikes, and it received the President of Iran in Delhi while the war continued. The contested point is whether a grouping carrying deep internal divisions, and a standing risk of Russian and Chinese domination, protects India’s room for manoeuvre or dilutes its partnership with Washington.

    How is BRICS read within India’s strategic community?

    1. The optimists: They argue that BRICS can function as an institution capable of multipolarising the global order, or of expediting that transition.
    2. The sceptics: They point to the grouping’s internal divisions and to the possibility of its domination by Russia and China.
    3. The dismissive view: A third group writes BRICS off as an annual gathering that generates strategic noise. It argues that India should limit its association with the grouping and expand its partnership with the United States instead.

    What made the Delhi summit consequential?

    1. Timing: The summit was held on 12 and 13 September 2026, the first since the United States and Israel launched their war against Iran on 28 February 2026. The Presidents of Iran, Russia and China were among the leaders present.
    2. Consensus among 11 members: New Delhi secured agreement among all 11 member countries, including the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Iran, which are involved in an undeclared conflict.
    3. The Delhi Declaration: The document records that member countries continue to find value in a BRICS worldview rooted in the pursuit of a more representative global order.
    4. Compromise as the method: The consensus was reached through compromises by every party rather than through convergence on a single position.

    How did India restore its balancing position in West Asia?

    1. The starting position: The Prime Minister was in Israel two days before Israel and the United States began bombing Iran. India then refrained from condemning the attacks or the assassination of Iran’s Supreme Leader, which created an impression that New Delhi was siding with Washington and Tel Aviv.
    2. The diplomatic cost: Pakistan seized the opening created by the war and stepped in as a mediator between the United States and Iran while India watched from the sidelines.
    3. The correction at Bishkek: India strongly endorsed the September resolution of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), a Eurasian security grouping, condemning the strikes on Iran and expressing condolences over the killing.
    4. The correction at Delhi: India hosted the President of Iran at the BRICS summit even as the war in West Asia continued.
    5. Why the platform matters: A multilateral forum let India recover a balancing posture without inflicting strategic damage on its bilateral relationships.

    Why does India keep engaging its competitors through the grouping?

    1. A channel that survives a bilateral freeze: Border problems with China continue to simmer with no immediate resolution. The forum keeps India and China engaged even when high level bilateral visits are not taking place.
    2. The cost of disengagement: A lack of engagement between competing major powers deepens mistrust. Mistrust combined with the security dilemma of their competition carries dangerous consequences.
    3. Guardrails for competitive coexistence: The two countries have to manage a troubled relationship rather than resolve it, and sustained bilateral and multilateral contact is what keeps the competition bounded.
    4. Convergence against unilateralism: On artificial intelligence regulation, the rules governing global trade and finance, climate change, border conflicts, and the role of multilateral bodies, members hold different priorities. They converge on the position that unilateralism by any bloc or power damages their interests.

    What does the American context add to the summit?

    1. A predictable approach: The United States approach to the rest of the world is predictable in that it subordinates other considerations to its own dominance.
    2. Tariffs on India: India was subjected to varying tariffs by Washington a few months before the summit.
    3. Economic exposure from the war: India was among the countries most affected economically by the United States and Israel war on Iran.
    4. The sanctions legislation: The United States House of Representatives passed the Russia sanctions Bill on 16 September, seeking tariffs of up to 100 per cent on countries including India.
    5. The Indian formulation: India’s foreign policy has been read by a section of commentators as a tilt towards the American camp, on the strength of the Prime Minister’s own statement that India had overcome its “hesitation of history”. The parallel official formulation of multi alignment, stated as ‘sabke sath’, has run alongside it throughout.

    What do the frontline cases show about great power alignment?

    1. Pakistan: A state that became a frontier in great power rivalry carries the cost of that position long after the rivalry that produced it has moved on.
    2. The UAE and Iran: Both would have been better placed dealing with each other than facing their present situation. Their bilateral meeting on the sidelines of the Delhi summit used a multilateral platform to address a bilateral problem.
    3. Ukraine: Backed by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), it has fought Russia for more than four years and holds no platform for direct contact with Moscow. Its diplomatic options therefore rest with Brussels and Washington rather than with itself.
    4. The Indian conclusion drawn: The strategic partnership with Washington remains important for India’s progress, and the outcome India must avoid is becoming a frontline in the competition between the United States and China.

    Challenges to BRICS as a vehicle for Indian strategic autonomy

    1. The weight of the largest economy: The grouping’s economic and institutional centre of gravity sits with China, so an agenda item can carry Chinese preferences without being stated as such. Eg. The push to admit countries heavily dependent on Chinese lending widens the membership in a direction that suits one member.
      The Fix: Fix written membership criteria for new entrants and partner countries, so admission turns on economic fit rather than on a sponsor’s preference.
    2. No secretariat and no charter: BRICS runs on rotating chairs and summit declarations, so a commitment made at one summit has no standing body to carry it to the next. Eg. The grouping has no permanent secretariat of the kind the European Union and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations maintain.
      The Fix: Create a small standing secretariat with a mandate limited to tracking implementation of summit commitments.
    3. De dollarisation moves slower than the declarations: Local currency settlement remains marginal against a dollar that still clears the overwhelming share of global trade and reserves. Eg. India and the UAE settled a crude oil payment in rupees and dirhams, which remains an exception rather than a channel.
      The Fix: Link the existing local currency settlement arrangements into one interoperable messaging and clearing layer, so a bilateral experiment becomes a usable route.
    4. Low trade among the members themselves: Members trade more with advanced economies than with each other, which limits what a shared declaration can deliver commercially. Eg. Most members still depend on G7 markets for high technology imports and services exports.
      The Fix: Prioritise tariff and standards work in a few sectors where member complementarity is real, rather than a general trade agenda across 11 economies.
    5. Expansion dilutes the agenda: A larger membership with wider political differences lowers the ambition of what a consensus document can say. Eg. The grouping now spans functioning democracies and authoritarian states, which keeps human rights and governance language out of joint texts.
      The Fix: Run substantive work through issue based coalitions of willing members, leaving the full summit to agree only what all members can carry.

    Conclusion

    India’s case for BRICS does not rest on the grouping being cohesive. It rests on the grouping giving a middle power somewhere to stand that is neither an alliance nor an isolation, which is what a country facing tariffs from one partner and a border dispute with another actually needs. The internal contradictions and the external convergence work against each other, and that unresolved pull is what keeps any one member from owning the platform. What to watch is whether the Delhi Declaration’s commitments acquire any machinery to carry them forward, and whether the Russia sanctions legislation is applied to India in a way that forces the choice this grouping exists to postpone.

    About BRICS

    1. Origin: The term was coined in 2001 by a Goldman Sachs economist to identify high growth emerging economies. The first leaders’ summit was held at Yekaterinburg in Russia in 2009.
    2. Membership: South Africa joined in 2011, and expansion decided at the 2023 Johannesburg Summit brought in Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran and the UAE in 2024 and Indonesia in 2025.
    3. Weight: The grouping accounts for over 45 per cent of the world’s population and roughly 37 per cent of global gross domestic product measured by purchasing power parity, a share larger than that of the G7.
    4. Partner country category: Introduced in 2024, it engages states such as Malaysia, Thailand and Nigeria without granting full membership.

    Initiatives under BRICS

    1. New Development Bank: Headquartered at Shanghai, it lends for infrastructure and sustainable development projects in member and partner countries, and has approved over $35 billion in loans.
    2. Contingent Reserve Arrangement: A $100 billion fund that provides short term liquidity support to a member facing balance of payments pressure.
    3. BRICS Pay: A cross border payment system in pilot stage, intended to settle trade among members without routing through existing Western messaging networks.
    4. Partnership on New Industrial Revolution: A cooperation programme covering artificial intelligence, digitalisation and green technology among member states.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2026, GS2, 10 marks] “BRICS acts as a powerful counterweight in global governance, actively amplifying the voice and influence of the Global South.” Explain the role of BRICS in projecting itself as an alternative to other groupings.”

  • In talks with Rubio, Jaishankar flags India concerns over Russia sanctions

    Why in the News

    India has conveyed its economic and strategic concerns over a new United States law that empowers Washington to impose penal tariffs on buyers of Russian energy. The External Affairs Minister raised the Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act (SRIA) with the United States Secretary of State at a bilateral meeting in New York, on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly session. This was the first official discussion between the two governments since the United States President signed the law. Russian Urals crude currently makes up 51 per cent of India’s total crude imports, so a measure aimed at buyers of Russian energy reaches India directly. The contested point is whether a partner’s energy sourcing can be made a sanctions target without unsettling the wider relationship that the same partner is being asked to deepen.

    What does the Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act do?

    1. A tariff mandate, not a discretion: The law mandates the United States President to penalise countries that buy Russian oil, with tariffs of up to 100 per cent. It directs action rather than leaving the choice open.
    2. Extension to Iran: The same law extends sanctions on trade with Iran.
    3. The implementation window: It can affect India if implemented after the stipulated one month period.
    4. How the penalty operates: The instrument is a tariff on goods from the purchasing country. The cost therefore lands on that country’s exports rather than on the oil trade itself.

    Why does the law bear on India?

    1. The share of Russian crude: Russian Urals makes up 51 per cent of India’s total crude imports, so no substitution is marginal.
    2. The stated Indian position: The Ministry of External Affairs has said the move would carry “implications” for the bilateral relationship and for the international energy market if India is pressured to cut its intake of Russian crude.
    3. Energy security as the ground: India’s stated ground for its sourcing is energy security for a population of 1.4 billion.
    4. Two exposures at once: India faces a supply question on the oil it buys and a market access question on the goods it sells, from the same instrument.

    What did the two sides say?

    1. India’s account: The External Affairs Minister said he had “reiterated India’s interests and concerns with regard to SRIA”, and that the situations in Ukraine and Iran were also discussed.
    2. The United States account: The Secretary of State’s public account referred to building the strategic partnership and to coordinating on key regional priorities and upcoming multilateral efforts.
    3. What the gap indicates: The law led the Indian readout and did not appear in the American one, so the two governments are not yet treating it as a shared agenda item.

    What is the diplomatic calendar around this exchange?

    1. Leader level meetings: The two are understood to be preparing for meetings between the United States President and the Prime Minister later this year.
    2. The likely venues: A meeting is possible at the ASEAN Summit in November, with a bilateral expected in mid December, when the United States hosts the G20 Summit in Miami.
    3. The Quad gap: This is the third year in succession that India has not hosted the Quad Summit. New Delhi has been seeking a date for the leaders of the United States, Australia and Japan to travel to India.

    Challenges to India’s Russian crude sourcing under sanctions pressure

    1. Secondary measures reach the service chain, not only the barrel: Shipping, insurance and payment channels can be designated even where the purchase of the oil is not itself prohibited. Eg. Tankers and shipping companies carrying Russian crude have been designated under earlier rounds of United States and European Union measures.
      The Fix: Expand rupee and third currency settlement and domestic protection and indemnity cover for crude cargoes, so the trade does not rest on sanctioned intermediaries.
    2. The discount is the whole commercial case: Russian crude is attractive because it sells at a discount to competing grades, and that discount narrows whenever the compliance risk of handling it rises. Eg. Indian refiners cut Russian purchases in earlier sanctions rounds once compliance costs offset the price gap.
      The Fix: Hold diversified term contracts with West Asian and African suppliers, so a disappearing discount becomes a pricing problem rather than a supply one.
    3. A tariff penalty lands on exporters with no role in the oil trade: A trade measure keyed to energy sourcing is paid by labour intensive exporters selling into the American market. Eg. Textiles, gems and jewellery, and marine products are among India’s most exposed export lines to the United States.
      The Fix: Pair any tariff exposure with a targeted export credit and market diversification package for the affected lines.
    4. Refinery configuration limits how fast sourcing can shift: A refinery is built for particular crude grades, so moving away from a medium sour blend is a technical and contractual decision rather than a purchasing one. Eg. Replacing Urals requires comparable medium sour barrels, largely from West Asia, at short notice.
      The Fix: Expand strategic petroleum reserve and commercial storage capacity, so a sourcing shift can be absorbed over months rather than weeks.

    Conclusion

    India’s objection is not to the sanctioning of Russia but to being made to pay for its own sourcing decisions through a trade penalty on unrelated exports. The law directs rather than permits, which leaves little room for the discretion a bilateral understanding would normally use, and that is why the exchange produced a stated concern instead of an assurance. What remains unresolved is whether a strategic partnership can carry a penalty aimed at one partner’s energy supply. The points to watch are whether the measure is actually applied when the statutory window closes, and whether the leader level meetings later this year are used to seek relief from it.

    Back2Basics: Urals Crude

    1. What it is: Urals is Russia’s principal export crude, a medium sour blend produced by mixing heavy sour oil from the Urals and Volga region with lighter Western Siberian grades.
    2. How it is priced: It trades at a differential to the Brent benchmark, and that differential is what makes it attractive or unattractive to a buyer.
    3. Why refiners want it: A medium sour grade suits complex refineries built to process heavier crude, which can convert it into higher value products at a lower input cost.
    4. Sanctions treatment: G7 countries and the European Union apply a price cap on seaborne Russian crude, under which Western shipping and insurance services are available only for cargoes sold below the capped price.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2025, GS2, 15 marks] “Energy security constitutes the dominant kingpin of India’s foreign policy, and is linked with India’s overarching influence in Middle Eastern countries.” How would you integrate energy security with India’s foreign policy trajectories in the coming years?”

More posts