Mains Ready By December. Smash Mains & Smash PYQ Admissions Open
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Search results for: “”

  • Why jurist Navi Pillay’s work matters for a world facing ‘existential challenges’

    Why jurist Navi Pillay’s work matters for a world facing ‘existential challenges’

    Why in the News

    The Nobel Peace Prize, which seldom goes to jurists, has this year honoured the rule of law itself as the foundation of peace. The 2026 prize went to South African jurist Navanethem “Navi” Pillay, 85, “for her efforts to promote peace, international law”, amid widening war.

    Why did the Committee honour a jurist?

    1. The citation: The Nobel Committee cited her “exceptional courage and integrity”, holding that the rule of law, national and international, underpins the system for keeping peace.
    2. Peace requires justice: The Committee’s line “Peace requires justice” means a settlement lasts only when grave crimes are punished, much as courts, not revenge, keep order within a country.
    3. Prosecuting atrocities: It credited her with ensuring that war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide are prosecuted.
    4. Nuremberg inspiration: The post war Nuremberg Trials showed her how law, through judicial power backed by punishment, could tackle state sponsored violence.
    5. The takeaway: Honouring a judge signals that international law is itself an instrument of peace, not a backdrop to diplomacy.

    How did apartheid shape her career?

    1. Indentured roots: Her Indian Tamil grandparents went to Africa as indentured labourers (workers bound by contract to years of labour abroad), and she grew up under racially discriminatory laws.
    2. Harvard doctorate: She became the first South African to earn a doctorate in law from Harvard University.
    3. Firsts in Natal: She was the first Black woman to start a law practice in Natal Province and the first to serve in its High Court, nominated by Nelson Mandela.
    4. Defending prisoners: She defended Mandela, the 1993 Nobel Peace laureate, in court and fought for anti apartheid prisoners’ rights such as access to lawyers.

    What did the Rwanda tribunal establish?

    1. ICTR: She served eight years as a judge of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), which tried crimes of the 1994 Rwandan genocide.
    2. Scale of killing: The genocide killed about 800,000 people in 100 days.
    3. First genocide judgment: The ICTR was the first international tribunal to enter a judgment for genocide, interpreting it under the Geneva Conventions against war crimes.
    4. Rape as genocide: It defined the crime of rape in international law and recognised it as a means of perpetrating genocide.
    5. Propaganda: It was the first to recognise the role of propaganda in aiding genocide, and held members of the media responsible.

    Where does her work stand today?

    1. ICJ ad hoc judge: She is an ad hoc judge (appointed by a party for one case) at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Gambia v. Myanmar, a genocide case over Myanmar’s Rohingya Muslims.
    2. Gaza inquiry: From 2021 to 2025 she chaired the United Nations (UN) Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory. It found Israeli forces deliberately targeted Palestinian children “resulting in genocide” in Gaza.
    3. Existential challenges: Amid “existential challenges” and more wars than in a long time, the Committee called international law an “absolute necessity”. Critics call the UN and ICJ powerless to stop violence.
    4. Call to states: Pillay says justice after conflict is still new and needs support from states, which should “care and act collectively”.

    Challenges

    1. No enforcement arm: International courts depend on states to arrest suspects and carry out rulings.
    2. Great power resistance: Powerful states reject findings or penalise courts. Eg. The US sanctioned the International Criminal Court hours after the prize.
    3. Slow proceedings: Genocide cases take years to decide, delaying redress for victims.

    Way Forward

    1. State cooperation: States should execute arrest warrants and comply with the rulings of international courts.
    2. Protected tribunals: Fund international tribunals adequately and shield their judges and staff from sanctions.
    3. Domestic prosecution: Countries should enact laws on genocide and crimes against humanity so national courts can try such crimes.

    Conclusion

    The prize rests on a wager that law, not force, can still restrain states in a period of widening war. That wager will be tested by whether governments comply with genocide rulings and protect international courts from political pressure.

    Back2Basics: International Court of Justice

    1. Status: The principal judicial organ of the UN, often called the “World Court”, based at The Hague, Netherlands.
    2. Origin: The UN Charter established it in 1945, and it began work in 1946, succeeding the Permanent Court of International Justice.
    3. Bench: Its 15 judges are elected for nine year terms by the UN General Assembly and the Security Council.
    4. Jurisdiction: It settles disputes between states through binding rulings and gives non-binding advisory opinions to authorised UN bodies.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2026] ‘X’, born in the UK, was conferred the Nobel Prize in 2025. He was a professor in an American university when the prize was announced. Identify ‘X’: (a) Michel H. Devoret (b) Richard Robson (c) John Clarke (d) Joel Mokyr ANSWER: C”

  • Invest in question banks, set question paper closer to exam: House panel to NTA

    Invest in question banks, set question paper closer to exam: House panel to NTA

    Why in the News

    Entrance test papers should move from being set long in advance to being drawn from a continuously updated question bank just before the exam, on government owned computer centres. The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Education, Women, Children, Youth and Sports made the case in its 382nd report, “Reforms and Strengthening of the National Testing Agency”, presented to the Rajya Sabha Chairman.

    Why does the panel want a question bank?

    1. Question bank: A large pool of vetted questions from which a paper is assembled only when needed, like drawing cards from a shuffled deck, so no setter knows the final paper.
    2. Leak window: A pen and paper test is set long before the exam to allow printing and transport, and each extra day widens the window for a leak.
    3. What CBT changes: Computer based testing (CBT) needs no printed or transported papers, so final papers can be set very close to the exam from questions experts vet using digital tools.
    4. Vetter quarantine: The experts who check the final paper should be strictly quarantined, cut off from outside contact, until the examination ends.
    5. The takeaway: The panel calls question banks the most viable long run defence against leaks, shifting security from guarding paper to shortening the time a paper exists.

    What infrastructure must come before NEET-UG moves online?

    1. NEET-UG to CBT: The Committee broadly concurs with a phased shift to CBT, including for the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (Undergraduate) (NEET-UG), once secure government owned infrastructure exists.
    2. Government centres: It wants 1,000 secure government CBT centres set up on a clear, phased timeline, particularly in smaller cities and rural areas, so reliance on private centres ends.
    3. School and college labs: The National Testing Agency (NTA) should itself fund mid sized information technology (IT) labs of 100 to 200 nodes (computer terminals) in schools and colleges.
    4. District coverage: At least one test centre in every district should offer all exams, cutting students’ travel and lodging costs.
    5. Private centres as weak link: Private institutions used as sub contracted centres have often proved a “weak link”, so all centres should be owned and operated by the Union or State governments.

    What other safeguards does the panel propose?

    1. Vetted experts: Bona fide experts from the Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs) and All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) should build question banks and translations, after integrity checks.
    2. Vendor blacklist: NTA should create and maintain a national registry of blacklisted examination vendors.
    3. Hybrid interim model: Until full CBT readiness, encrypted questions can be delivered to a centre and printed there, which the Committee was told is feasible.
    4. Late candidates: Candidates arriving a few minutes late for genuine reasons may enter after giving an undertaking, but get no extra time.
    5. Manpower shortage: The panel flagged NTA’s staff shortage and urged it to speed up permanent recruitment and develop its own permanent cadre.

    Challenges

    1. Building cost: Government centres in every district need sustained funding and years of work, delaying the shift.
    2. Digital divide: Rural candidates with little computer exposure may be disadvantaged when tests move on screen.
    3. Multi-shift fairness: A test as large as NEET-UG may need several CBT sessions, which raises questions about normalising scores across shifts.
    4. Fragile trust: A single breach damages confidence in the whole system. Eg. The NEET-UG 2024 paper leak and grace marks controversy.

    Way Forward

    1. Funded roadmap: The Ministry of Education should publish a funded, phased plan for the government centre network.
    2. Practice access: NTA should offer free CBT practice sessions for rural candidates before the switch.
    3. Audited normalisation: Any method used to equalise scores across shifts should be independently audited and explained to students in advance.
    4. Time bound response: The government should table an action taken reply on each recommendation within a fixed period.

    Conclusion

    The report moves the debate from punishing leaks after they happen to designing tests that leave little to leak. Its effect now rests on the government’s response and on whether a government owned CBT network is ready before NEET-UG goes online.

    Back2Basics: Department-related Standing Committees

    1. What they are: Permanent committees of Parliament, each examining the work of particular ministries, including their budget allocations and spending.
    2. Size: There are 24 such committees, each with 31 members drawn from both Houses.
    3. Tenure: Members are nominated, not elected, and serve a one year term.
    4. History: The system was formally constituted in 1993 and restructured to its present size in 2004.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2026, GS2, 15 marks] Should education be treated primarily as a welfare obligation of the state or as a strategic investment for building a globally competitive, knowledge-driven nation? Critically evaluate.”

  • From Cornell to Kolkata, let’s work with the boys who will one day be men

    Why in the News

    Gang sexual assaults at South Calcutta Law College in Kolkata and at Cornell University in the United States followed one pattern, a group of men using phones during the assault. Cases from Louisiana to a French village show the conditions that create such groups are universal, and digital media amplifies them.

    What turns a group of men into a ‘pack’?

    1. Pack behaviour: Inside a group, each man permits himself to abandon his humanity because those around him are doing so, like peer pressure pushed to a criminal extreme.
    2. Three conditions: The pack needs a group for which each man performs, a private space, and confidence that nobody will tell, since each is a perpetrator.
    3. Performing for an audience: Recording and sharing show the men perform even for those absent, so online validation can matter more than the act.
    4. Men with power: Those involved often hold power. Eg. The main accused in Kolkata was a former leader of the then ruling party’s student wing.
    5. The takeaway: Because these conditions are common, the pack can form in expected and unexpected places alike.

    Why do the cases cut across stereotypes?

    1. Kolkata: Students assaulted a fellow student in a campus guard room and used a phone as a camera to record it.
    2. Cornell: In Ithaca, New York, students used a group chat to bring others in.
    3. Louisiana State University: A student alleged a football player raped her last year. He still plays after her complaint, which points to athletic culture.
    4. Mazan, France: For nearly a decade, Dominique Pelicot drugged his wife, Gisele, and invited ordinary men to rape her.
    5. Stereotypes: The cases feed images of India as inherently unsafe for women and of American fraternity culture, yet a quiet French village fits neither.

    How does digital media change such assaults?

    1. Easier to organise: The internet did not invent gang rape, but phones, cameras and platforms make it easier to organise, film and share.
    2. Permission online: Men with violent fantasies find each other online, and a group chat can create a sense of permission before anyone meets.
    3. Uses of a recording: A recording lets the group boast and gives it a means to shame or threaten the victim.
    4. Evidence trail: Digital data also leaves a trail to perpetrators. Eg. Pelicot’s own recordings and messages helped convict him and the other men.
    5. Bypassing institutions: Platforms help survivors and journalists get past institutions that prefer silence.

    Does online pornography normalise sexual aggression?

    1. Strangulation content: England’s Children’s Commissioner found 58% of young people surveyed had seen pornography depicting strangulation before turning 18.
    2. Persuasion myth: It found 44% of children surveyed agreed that “girls may say no at first but then can be persuaded”.
    3. Expected aggression: Another survey found nearly half of those aged 18 to 21 believed girls “expect” physical aggression in sex.
    4. Causation unproven: The data does not prove pornography causes rape. Yet when online content makes sex with an unresponsive woman routine, as at Cornell and Mazan, men learn to treat incapacity as opportunity.

    Challenges

    1. Low conviction: Only about 28% of rape cases end in conviction, which weakens deterrence.
    2. Institutional cover ups: Colleges often protect their reputation by burying complaints.
    3. Patriarchal socialisation: Family, media and education naturalise male dominance from childhood.

    Way Forward

    1. Early evidence preservation: Investigators should secure physical and digital evidence before it degrades.
    2. Breaking group silence: Campuses should create safe channels for bystanders and group members to report.
    3. Institutions that look: Hold officials who bury cases accountable, and use digital tools to catch perpetrators early.
    4. Engaging boys early: Families, teachers and mentors should teach boys to respect women and be wary of the pack.

    Conclusion

    Laws and investigations act only after a crime, but the conditions that produce group assault form long before it. Whether families, schools and campuses teach respect and make silence costly will decide if the next pack is stopped before it acts.

    Government Initiatives for Women’s Safety

    1. Mission Shakti (Sambal): Its safety vertical covers One Stop Centres, the Women Helpline, Beti Bachao Beti Padhao and Nari Adalats (community forums for gender justice disputes).
    2. Nirbhaya Fund: It funds Women Help Desks in over 13,000 police stations to make them approachable for survivors.
    3. Safe City Projects: Running in 8 major metros, they use artificial intelligence (AI) enabled cameras and panic buttons in public spaces.
    4. National Database on Sexual Offenders: Police use it to track repeat offenders.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2025, GS2, 10 marks] Women’s social capital complements in advancing empowerment and gender equity. Explain.”

  • Why primary school teachers quit, or are demotivated

    Why primary school teachers quit, or are demotivated

    Why in the News

    World Teachers’ Day on 5 October marked 60 years of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) Recommendation concerning the Status of Teachers (1966). UNESCO used it to flag new strains on teachers from digital technology, climate change, migration and displacement. In India, primary teachers remain the least valued, and the way they are prepared is itself in question.

    Why do teachers leave the profession?

    1. UNESCO Recommendation (1966): It set benchmarks for teachers’ rights and responsibilities and standards for their professional preparation, like a global charter for the teaching profession.
    2. Early exits: UNESCO’s Global Report on Teachers warned that many teachers quit within their first five years of practice, especially at the primary level.
    3. Five causes: The report traced the shortage to low motivation, sluggish recruitment, weak professional preparation, difficult working conditions and low status.
    4. Knock on effects: Each departure loads the teachers who remain:
      • their workloads increase;
      • their sense of well being suffers;
      • prospective teachers are discouraged from joining.
    5. The takeaway: Teacher shortages feed on themselves, because every teacher who quits makes the job harder for those who stay.

    Why are primary teachers valued least?

    1. Principal eligibility: Experience of teaching at the primary level does not count towards eligibility to become a school principal.
    2. Path to policy: Secondary teachers appointed as principals later join the bureaucracy and shape policy, a route closed to primary teachers.
    3. Missing voice: More than 70 years after Independence, the wisdom of primary teachers remains absent from educational policymaking.
    4. University reluctance: Indian universities have been reluctant to lead teacher preparation, especially for the primary level.

    Should teachers be trained or educated?

    1. B.El.Ed. breakthrough: In the 1990s, Delhi University institutionalised the four year Bachelor of Elementary Education (B.El.Ed.), an integrated professional degree for elementary school teachers.
    2. Teacher identity: Its graduates saw themselves as teachers of children, not transmitters of a subject, and stayed on to improve the system.
    3. Training model: Training teaches “tricks of the trade” such as voice modulation and keeps teachers dependent on trainers. It does little to build the habit of pursuing knowledge independently.
    4. What teaching demands: Teaching needs command over knowledge and recognition of students’ disparities of caste, poverty, gender and language.
    5. Colonial roots: Treating teacher preparation as training began in the colonial, textbook centred school system.

    How does NEP 2020 change teacher education?

    1. ITEP: The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 replaces all teacher education programmes with the Integrated Teacher Education Programme (ITEP), a new name for the older BA or BSc with Bachelor of Education (B.Ed.) course.
    2. Homogenisation: One programme for teachers of every school stage treats very different jobs as the same. It reinforces the colonial training format rather than breaking from it.
    3. Casual treatment: Universities moving to a four year undergraduate programme applied general higher education rules to teacher education without adapting them.
    4. Content over learners: ITEP’s design is taken up with credit counts and dual degree arrangements, so subject content comes before learners’ needs and teachers’ autonomy.

    Challenges

    1. Single teacher schools: Over 1 lakh schools run with a single teacher, who must handle several grades at once.
    2. Non-teaching load: Surveys and data entry duties cut the time teachers spend actually teaching.
    3. Regional language gap: Too few teachers work in regional languages, which hampers comprehension at the foundational stage.

    Way Forward

    1. Count primary experience: Make primary teaching experience count towards eligibility for principal posts.
    2. Teachers in policymaking: Give serving primary teachers a formal seat on curriculum and education policy bodies.
    3. Professional elementary degrees: Universities should run integrated elementary education degrees built around how children learn, on the B.El.Ed. model.
    4. Education management cadre: Create a separate administrative cadre so teachers can focus on the classroom.

    Conclusion

    Teacher shortage is less a recruitment gap than a problem of status and preparation that pushes teachers out early. Whether the new integrated programme is redesigned around learners and teacher autonomy, rather than credits and subject content, will decide if new teachers stay.

    School teachers in India

    1. Workforce: India has over 1.01 crore school teachers, a 6.7% rise over the previous year, according to the Unified District Information System for Education Plus (UDISE+).
    2. Women teachers: Women make up 54.2% of school teachers, up from 52.3% earlier.
    3. Pupil teacher ratio: At the secondary level it has improved to 21 students per teacher, against an NEP norm of 30.
    4. Regulator: The National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) regulates institutes that train teachers for B.Ed. and D.El.Ed. qualifications.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2026, GS2, 15 marks] Should education be treated primarily as a welfare obligation of the state or as a strategic investment for building a globally competitive, knowledge-driven nation? Critically evaluate.”

  • BRICS in a fragmented world order, a test of relevance

    Why in the News

    The 18th BRICS Summit in New Delhi adopted the New Delhi Declaration unanimously, reconciling the views of the 11 member grouping under India’s chairmanship. Shifting coalitions, unmet founding demands and China’s growing weight leave open what membership adds to India’s strength.

    What did the New Delhi Declaration commit BRICS to?

    1. Summit declaration: A declaration is like a joint to do list all members sign. This one spanned governance, trade, finance, energy, climate, technology, health and agriculture, and backed humanitarian access in Gaza and de-escalation in West Asia.
    2. Trade and payments: Members will work towards local currency trade and payment systems that link across borders. They backed the BRICS Economic Partnership Strategy 2030.
    3. Value chains and AI: It adopted a Global Value Chain Action Plan for 2026 to 2030, for cross border production. It backed cooperation on Artificial Intelligence (AI) governance and wider access to computing resources.
    4. Global institutions: It sought a more representative United Nations (UN), reformed Bretton Woods institutions (the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank) and a two tier World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute system.
    5. The takeaway: Agreement this broad marks a move from diplomatic spectacle towards substance.

    How did India use its chairmanship?

    1. Ten reform proposals: The Prime Minister urged leaders to draw up 10 global governance reform proposals, arguing that “if the future is shared, the right to shape it must be assured”.
    2. Strategic autonomy: The Declaration fits India’s strategic autonomy and multi alignment, meaning working ties with rival camps without joining any alliance.
    3. Summit optics: The Chinese and Russian Presidents attended, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Iran took part without mutual recriminations.

    Why does a sober assessment doubt BRICS’s relevance?

    1. Variable geometry: In this age of ‘variable geometry’, ad hoc coalitions on shared interests replace deep alliances. Multilateralism (near universal rules) is giving way to plurilateralism (deals among small willing groups), BRICS included.
    2. Coalition of the willing: At best, BRICS resembles Europe’s ‘coalition of the willing’, a group formed after the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) nearly collapsed.
    3. Unmet founding demands: Since the first BRIC summit at Yekaterinburg, Russia (2009), members have demanded reform of the IMF, World Bank and UN and less reliance on western finance. Neither has happened.
    4. No integrated bloc: Better trade opportunities have not made BRICS an integrated economic bloc able to stand up to the ‘Bretton Woods Twins’.

    How does China’s weight unbalance the grouping?

    1. Chinese preponderance: In nearly two decades, China’s economic weight has eclipsed every other member, giving it political heft and creating a serious imbalance.
    2. Global South credentials: The United States (US) President’s deference to China’s President in Washington in September 2026 shows China no longer belongs to the Global South of developing countries.
    3. Anti hegemony stance: China was a fledgling economy in 2009. Its own dominance now undercuts the grouping’s stance against Western hegemony (dominance by one power).
    4. India China tensions: India and China have had no serious clash since Galwan (2020), but relations remain uneasy.
    5. India’s gain: India need not fear the Thucydides Trap (war when a rising power challenges an established one) or Charles Kindleberger’s theories of a leaderless world economy. Membership still adds little to its strength.

    Challenges

    1. Informal structure: No permanent secretariat or charter follows up BRICS declarations.
    2. Dollar dominance: The US dollar still settles over 80% of global trade, so local currency trade stays marginal.
    3. Mixed political systems: Democracies and autocracies struggle to agree on human rights norms.
    4. Expansion strain: A larger group risks becoming a talk shop like the Non Aligned Movement.

    Way Forward

    1. Membership criteria: Members should fix formal criteria for full and partner members.
    2. Stronger lender: Strengthen the New Development Bank (NDB), the BRICS lender, with more capital and members.
    3. Functional cooperation: Prioritise less sensitive areas such as health, space and education.

    Conclusion

    BRICS can still agree on paper, but a widening power gap among its members limits its ability to act together. Whether that gap becomes a shared asset or a veto will decide if membership adds real strength for India.

    About BRICS

    1. Origin: A Goldman Sachs economist coined “BRIC” in 2001. Its Foreign Ministers first met on the UN General Assembly margins in 2006.
    2. Expansion: South Africa joined in 2011. Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran and the UAE joined in 2024, and Indonesia a year later.
    3. Combined weight: Members hold over 45% of world population and about 37% of global gross domestic product (GDP), measured at purchasing power parity.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2026] Which of the following countries are members of the European Union? 1. Belarus 2. Poland 3. Germany 4. Switzerland (a) 1, 2 and 4 (b) 1 and 4 only (c) 2 and 3 (d) 2 and 4 only ANSWER: C”

  • Admitting ‘instances of bulk Form 7 filing for voter deletion’, EC sets limit

    Why in the News

    Individual voters, who earlier faced no limit on physical Form 7 objections, can now file only 10 during a roll revision’s claims and objections period and five a month otherwise. The Election Commission of India (ECI) told the Chief Electoral Officers of all States and Union Territories to apply the limits. It admitted “instances” of bulk filing on unsubstantiated grounds, amid allegations of targeted deletions during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR).

    What is Form 7, and why did bulk filing become a problem?

    1. What it is: Form 7 is the statutory form to seek deletion of a name from the electoral roll, or to object to a proposed inclusion. It works like a formal complaint against a voter.
    2. Who may file: Under Rule 13(2) of the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, objections can be made only through this form, and only by an elector of the same Assembly constituency.
    3. Earlier limits: Online filing was capped at six at a time, but physical bulk filings were left to the Electoral Registration Officer (ERO), the official who prepares a constituency’s roll.
    4. What went wrong: Bulk objections on unsubstantiated grounds caused “avoidable inconvenience” to voters objected upon and raised the workload of field functionaries.
    5. The takeaway: Without a cap, one person could force many voters through a hearing to defend their place on the roll.

    What limits has the ECI now set?

    1. Revision period cap: The limit of 10, online and offline combined, covers the whole claims and objections period. It usually lasts one month after a draft roll in a Special Summary Revision or SIR.
    2. Continuous updation cap: The monthly limit of five applies when no revision is under way and rolls are updated in the normal course.
    3. Party agents: For the SIR, Booth Level Agents (BLAs), the parties’ booth representatives, may file up to 50 forms a day with Booth Level Officers (BLOs) before the draft roll and 10 after.
    4. Existing manual bar: Para 11.3.2(ii) of the Manual on Electoral Rolls, 2023 already says bulk claims and objections by an individual, including by post, should not be entertained.

    What must the ERO do before deleting a name?

    1. Hearing the objector: The ERO must issue a notice to the objector, hear them personally and record statements separately for each Form 7.
    2. Hearing the voter: Once satisfied an objection is valid, the ERO must give the person objected to a hearing before passing an order.
    3. Penalty for false claims: Where a complaint is false or fabricated, the ERO acts against the applicant under Section 31 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, which penalises false declarations.

    Where have bulk filings been alleged?

    1. Spread of allegations: Since the SIR began, parties in Jharkhand, Odisha, Telangana and Karnataka have accused rivals of bulk Form 7 filing.
    2. Karnataka: The Chief Minister alleged BJP workers were given pre printed Form 7s, and an FIR followed.
    3. Odisha: After BLOs complained that forms were uploaded in their names, the ECI removed the Assistant ERO accused of using their login credentials.

    Challenges

    1. Coordinated filing: A per person cap still allows many individuals to file in concert against the same voters.
    2. Credential misuse: Online systems can be gamed through officials’ logins, as the Odisha case showed.
    3. Field burden: A hearing for every objection stretches EROs and BLOs in a time bound revision.

    Way Forward

    1. Voter alerts: Notify an elector by text message whenever a Form 7 is filed against them.
    2. Access audits: Audit login records of BLO and ERO accounts to detect misuse.
    3. Published outcomes: Release constituency wise counts of Form 7 filings and decisions so targeting patterns become visible.

    Conclusion

    The ECI has replaced officers’ discretion over bulk objections with a fixed numerical limit for each individual. Whether the cap curbs targeted deletions without blocking genuine objections will show in the ongoing SIR’s claims and objections record.

    Back2Basics: Special Intensive Revision (SIR)

    1. What it is: A time bound, house to house enumeration in which BLOs verify every voter entry, unlike the routine summary revision.
    2. Legal basis: Article 324 gives the ECI superintendence over electoral rolls, and Section 21 of the Representation of the People Act allows a special revision at any time for recorded reasons.
    3. History: The first intensive revisions, held between 1952 and 1956, built the new nation’s first voter database.
    4. Earlier coverage: “Flawed by design, exclusionary in impact” (9 October 2026) examined the SIR’s design and the judgment upholding it.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2026, GS2, 10 marks] Is the right to vote a fundamental right? Discuss the position of the Election Commission of India while undertaking the revision of electoral rolls. Can it also examine the question of citizenship of voters?”

  • MP HC nixes 27% OBC reservation, says case not made out for raise

    Why in the News

    Other Backward Classes (OBC) reservation in Madhya Pradesh falls back from 27% to 14% after the Madhya Pradesh High Court struck down the 2019 law that raised it. A division bench held that the State failed to show the exceptional circumstances needed to breach the 50% ceiling set by a nine judge Bench in Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992).

    What did the 2019 law do, and why did it fail?

    1. The 2019 law: The then Congress State government raised the OBC quota before that year’s Lok Sabha elections.
    2. Political backing: OBCs are about half of the State’s population, and the BJP government that took office in 2020 also supported the law.
    3. The 50% ceiling: Total reservation may not exceed half of seats or posts. Like a speed limit crossed only in an emergency, a State going beyond it must prove its case is exceptional.
    4. Question before the court: The issue was whether the increase was justified, not whether OBCs deserve reservation. The bench held OBCs “are certainly entitled” to 14%.
    5. The takeaway: A population share alone does not justify crossing the ceiling; a State must show, with data, that a group remains inadequately represented.

    What evidence and reasoning did the bench rely on?

    1. Higher education: A study by Dr B R Ambedkar University of Social Sciences found OBCs make up 33.87% of higher education enrolment, well above their quota.
    2. Enrolment growth: All India Survey of Higher Education (AISHE) data showed OBC enrolment rising 163% over the survey period.
    3. Government jobs: OBCs hold 28.16% of government positions. Vacant OBC posts show the State failed to fill them, so they cannot justify a higher quota.
    4. Political dominance: Four OBC Chief Ministers in succession and over 25% of Ministers and MLAs from OBCs showed no inadequacy of political representation.
    5. Constitutional values: The bench cited Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s The Social Contract, linking natural freedom and social limits to liberty, equality and fraternity.

    What happens to recruitment now?

    1. Appointees protected: OBC candidates appointed against the additional quota up to 29 September 2022 keep their jobs, adjusted against the next three recruitment drives.
    2. Later recruitment: Appointments made after that date follow an 87% basis, with the remaining 13% of posts filled from the unreserved category.
    3. State response: The Chief Minister said the government will study the judgment and pursue further legal proceedings.
    4. Political blame: The former Chief Minister accused the BJP of presenting a weak case. The BJP State president called the 2019 ordinance hasty.

    Challenges

    1. States testing the ceiling: Quotas above half invite repeated litigation. Eg. Jaishri Laxmanrao Patil (2021) struck down Maharashtra’s Maratha quota.
    2. Benefits concentrated within OBCs: The Justice G. Rohini Commission found 97% of central OBC quota benefits go to under 25% of OBC castes.
    3. Recruitment uncertainty: Adjusted appointments and a likely appeal keep State recruitment in flux.

    Way Forward

    1. Fresh backwardness data: Commission contemporary, quantifiable data through a dedicated body before any quota change.
    2. Sub categorisation: Divide the OBC quota so the least represented castes gain a share.
    3. Fill reserved vacancies: Recruit against existing vacant OBC posts before seeking a larger quota.

    Conclusion

    Madhya Pradesh’s OBC quota now turns on adequacy of representation rather than population share. The State’s appeal will test whether any State can show the exceptional case the ceiling demands.

    Key numbers

    1. Government jobs, other groups: Scheduled Castes 17.58%, Scheduled Tribes 17.99%.
    2. Data sources: Ambedkar University study (2023); AISHE 2021-22.
    3. Protected appointments start: March 2019.

    Back2Basics: Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992)

    1. What it decided: A nine judge Bench upheld 27% OBC reservation in central jobs, based on the Mandal Commission report.
    2. Creamy layer: It introduced the creamy layer exclusion, keeping better off OBC families out of the quota.
    3. Promotions: It barred reservation in promotions, a bar later addressed through the 77th Constitutional Amendment and Article 16(4A).
    4. Earlier coverage: “In opposing creamy layer for SC/STs, what the government argued” (11 August 2026) carries the case’s basics.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2026] X’ was addressing a seminar on the meaning of the term ‘law’ as provided under Article 13, Part III of the Constitution of India. ‘X’ explained that the meaning of the term ‘law’ in the Constitution of India was very comprehensive. It included ordinances, orders and even rules and regulations. ‘Y’ pointed out that the term ‘law’ in Article 13 also included custom or usage having in the territory of India the force of law, to which ‘X’ was not convinced. Based on the above, select the correct conclusion from the options given below: (a) X is correct in the interpretation of law, including the view on non-inclusion of custom (b) The view of Y that ‘law’ included custom is not correct (c) The views of both X and Y are correct (d) The view of only Y is correct ANSWER: D”

  • How India plans to rebuild its new investment treaty network to attract investors

    Why in the News

    India has cut the wait before a foreign investor can go to international arbitration from five years to two years, in its new Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) with Saudi Arabia. The pact is part of an overhaul of the treaty network India dismantled a decade ago, with 4 to 5 agreements expected by year end and a new model template awaiting Union Cabinet approval.

    What is a BIT, and why does the local remedies rule matter?

    1. What it is: A BIT is an agreement between two countries setting rules for investment by companies of one in the other. Like a written guarantee of fair treatment, it promotes and protects foreign investment.
    2. Investor State Dispute Settlement (ISDS): This treaty clause lets a foreign investor take the host state to international arbitration for an alleged treaty violation.
    3. Exhaustion of local remedies (ELR): This rule makes the investor first seek redress in the host state’s domestic courts or administrative bodies before bringing an international claim.
    4. What went wrong: After terminating multiple BITs in 2016-17, India insisted on a five year ELR, which foreign investors flagged as a major challenge.
    5. The takeaway: The ELR period decides how quickly an investor reaches a neutral forum, so it is the clearest test of how investor friendly a treaty is.

    What has changed in India’s treaty practice?

    1. Budget review: The Union Budget 2025-26 announced a review of the model BIT to make it investor friendly. The Finance Minister says Cabinet approval of the new template is due “shortly”.
    2. Pacts already signed: Agreements with Saudi Arabia, Israel and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) were signed keeping the new framework in mind.
    3. Shorter waits: India accepted a three year ELR in its 2024 BIT with the UAE. The Saudi treaty, finalised last week, shortens the wait further.
    4. Partners want less: Trade partners have sought a one year ELR, which India has not accepted so far.
    5. Investment context: The new pacts come amid a sharp slowdown in net investment inflows, and Saudi investment in Indian refineries is expected.

    How should India balance investor protection and policy space?

    1. Stated rationale: A two year ELR gives investors enhanced access to ISDS. It also keeps the State’s right to regulate, its power to make public interest rules that affect investors.
    2. Uniform practice: A legal expert at Jindal Global Law School argues for one treaty practice, with the model BIT allowing one to two years for local remedies and no more.
    3. Workable time limit: The same expert holds that the limitation period, the deadline for filing an ISDS claim, should not be too strict for foreign investors.
    4. Why States terminated: Adverse orders from international tribunals were seen as encroaching on domestic policy space. Eg. South Africa and Indonesia also terminated BITs.

    Challenges

    1. Uneven treaty terms: Different ELR periods across the UAE, Saudi and other pacts leave investors without one predictable standard.
    2. Slow domestic courts: Any ELR binds investors to slow courts, and court delay produced India’s first adverse award. Eg. White Industries Australia v. India (2011).
    3. Regulatory exposure: Wider ISDS access opens tax and regulatory measures to arbitral claims. Eg. Vodafone and Cairn Energy won awards against retrospective tax demands.

    Way Forward

    1. Approve the template: Clear the new model BIT so pending negotiations proceed from one agreed text.
    2. Faster commercial justice: Strengthen commercial courts so a local remedies period ends in a decision, not delay.
    3. Defined exceptions: Spell out public interest exceptions precisely, so the right to regulate survives shorter waits.

    Conclusion

    India’s treaty policy is moving from shielding the state from arbitration to offering investors a shorter, defined route to it. Whether the approved template fixes one uniform standard, and whether the agreements now under negotiation follow it, is what to watch.

    Back2Basics: 2016 Model BIT

    1. Negotiating template: The model is the standard text India negotiates from, like a standard contract form.
    2. Narrow protections: It narrowed what counts as an investment and kept wide exceptions for regulatory action by the state.
    3. Shrinking network: After the model tightened terms, BITs in force fell from 73 to just eight.
    4. Earlier coverage: “We have a model investment treaty. And are losing billions because of it” (2 October 2026) examined its cost to India.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2022] Which one of the following situations best reflects “Indirect Transfers” often talked about in media recently with reference to India ? (a) An Indian company investing in a foreign enterprise and paying taxes to the foreign country on the profits arising out of its investment (b) A foreign company investing in India and paying taxes to the country of its base on the profits arising out of its investment (c) An Indian company purchases tangible assets in a foreign country and sells such assets after their value increases and transfers the proceeds to India (d) A foreign company transfers shares and such shares derive their substantial value from assets located in India ANSWER: (d)”

  • India’s ‘WorldSkills’ medals reflect patient investment

    India’s ‘WorldSkills’ medals reflect patient investment

    Why in the News

    India finished 10th at the 48th WorldSkills Competition in Shanghai, China, entering the world’s top 10 for the first time with 26 medals, its largest haul. The result is presented as the return on patient investment in people, and as the case for a third investment discipline, ‘Skill-Ex’, alongside Capex and Opex.

    What is WorldSkills, and how far has India climbed?

    1. WorldSkills Competition: Called the “Olympics of skills” and held every two years, it has over 1,400 young people from about 70 countries and regions perform practical tasks judged by international experts.
    2. Trades tested: Tasks run from welding and wiring to robotics and cyber security, rewarding workshop skill rather than examination marks.
    3. Earlier ranks: India rose from 39th in 2011 to 13th, a rank held until 2024, but its best earlier haul was four bronze medals.
    4. Shanghai result: India won six silver medals and 20 Medallions for Excellence.
    5. The takeaway: India’s best medals moved from bronze to silver, so the quality of its skilled workers, not only participation, is rising.

    How did the medal winners reach Shanghai?

    1. New disciplines: India competed in 11 skills for the first time and won half its silver medals there: dental prosthetics, digital interactive media design and retail sales.
    2. IndiaSkills selection: Over 3.65 lakh young people registered for IndiaSkills, the national competition, across 63 skills. Entrants climbed from district to State and regional rounds.
    3. National finals: Regional contests narrowed the field to about 650 finalists in Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh. The 70 chosen formed India’s largest ever team.
    4. Whole of government approach: The Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship (MSDE), the National Skill Development Corporation (NSDC) and the States worked with industry experts to find and train the team.

    What is ‘Skill-Ex’, and how does PM-SETU apply it?

    1. Capex and Opex: Nations measure progress in capital expenditure (Capex), the roads, ports and factories they build, and operating expenditure (Opex), the cost of running them.
    2. ‘Skill-Ex’: It means deliberate spending on the people who run those assets, because a road or factory stays productive only with skilled workers.
    3. PM-SETU: The Pradhan Mantri Skilling and Employability Transformation through Upgraded ITIs (PM-SETU) scheme, worth Rs 60,000 crore, upgrades 1,000 government Industrial Training Institutes (ITIs), which train young people in trades.
    4. Hub and spoke design: The upgraded ITIs are grouped as 200 hubs and 800 spokes, so each hub supports nearby smaller institutes. Industry partners manage each cluster.

    Why should skilling be valued like a degree?

    1. Work as worship: Verse 18.46 of the Bhagavad Gita holds that a person attains perfection through their own work, so a craft practised with care is a virtue, not only a livelihood.
    2. Missing podium: Indian families celebrate toppers’ lists and merit ranks, but skilling has had no comparable place in public life.
    3. Changing perceptions: The Prime Minister met the winners, which tells families that a skills medal deserves the respect given to an examination rank.

    Challenges

    1. Narrow formal base: Only 4.7% of India’s workforce has formal skill training, against 80% in South Korea, according to the NSDC.
    2. Weak placement: Only 18% of candidates trained under the Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana (PMKVY) have secured jobs.
    3. Trainer shortage: Over 1 lakh trainer posts lie vacant in public and private ITIs, according to MSDE data.

    Way Forward

    1. Industry spending: Employers should budget for Skill-Ex as seriously as for Capex and Opex.
    2. Skill mapping: Sector Skill Councils should align courses with changing job market demand.
    3. Outcome linked funding: Tie scheme funds to placement, wage gain and job retention through result based financing.
    4. Credit bridge: Align vocational credits with university credits so ITI students can move into higher education.

    Conclusion

    A structured selection and training ladder can turn ordinary workshop learners into world class craftsmen. Whether that quality reaches the millions trained in government institutes, measured in jobs and wages rather than medals, will decide whether skilling delivers a demographic dividend.

    Government Initiatives for Skill Development

    1. Skill India Mission (2015): Trains and upskills the working age population through PMKVY, apprenticeships, community centres and ITIs.
    2. PMKVY 4.0: Short term youth skilling aligned with industry, adding future roles in artificial intelligence, Industry 4.0 and green jobs.
    3. National Apprenticeship Promotion Scheme (NAPS): Promotes “earn while you learn” apprenticeships, with the government paying 25% of the stipend, up to Rs 1,500 a month.
    4. Jan Shikshan Sansthan (JSS): Offers non formal, community based skilling to non literates, neo literates and school dropouts.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2018] Consider the following statements : Human capital formation as a concept is better explained in terms of a process which enables 1. individuals of a country to accumulate more capital. 2. increasing the knowledge, skill levels and capacities the people of the country. 3. accumulation of tangible wealth. 4. accumulation of intangible wealth. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 and 2 (b) (b)2 only (c) (c)2 and 4 (d) 1, 3 and 4 ANSWER: (c)”

  • Nobel Prize in Literature: Anne Carson: A provocateur who blurs boundaries between genres

    Nobel Prize in Literature: Anne Carson: A provocateur who blurs boundaries between genres

    Why in the News

    The 2026 Nobel Prize in Literature honours a writer for creating new forms in dialogue with the classical tradition, not for mastering one genre. The Swedish Academy has named Anne Carson, a 76 year old Canadian poet, classicist, essayist and translator. Her books move between poetry, fiction, criticism and memoir.

    Who is Anne Carson, and what did the Nobel recognise?

    1. The citation: It recognises her “bold and inventive oeuvre (body of work) that, in playful dialogue with the classical tradition, has created new forms for contemporary literature”.
    2. Early life: Born in Toronto in June 1950, she changed schools often. A school Latin teacher, whom she credits for her “career and happiness”, taught her Greek in lunch hour lessons.
    3. Classics: She studied Classics (ancient Greek and Latin literature) at the University of Toronto. Her 1981 doctoral dissertation was on Sappho, an ancient Greek poet.
    4. Why she writes: In a 2004 interview she said she writes “to find out what I think about something”. She uses ancient Greek literature to clarify the contemporary.
    5. The takeaway: The prize rewards a scholar of the ancient world who turned classical learning into forms that read as contemporary.

    Which works built her reputation?

    1. Eros the Bittersweet (1986): Her first book grew from her academic work and examines desire through a classical lens. It holds that desire is created by distance and shaped by longing and imagination.
    2. Autobiography of Red (1998): A novel in verse recasting the myth of Geryon, a red winged monster killed by Herakles, as a sensitive adolescent’s love for Herakles. Red Doc> (2013) later returned to its characters.
    3. The Beauty of the Husband (2001): “A fictional essay in 29 tangos”. It made her the first woman to win the TS Eliot Prize.
    4. Nox (2010): Made after her estranged brother Michael died, it joins photographs, letters, translation and handwritten fragments in an accordion fold. It explores grief and the difficulty of holding on to someone through language.
    5. Wrong Norma (2024): Won the National Book Critics Circle Award for Poetry in 2025.

    What makes her work distinct?

    1. Crossing genres: A poem can become an essay in her hands, an essay a translation and a translation autobiography. An ancient myth turns into a modern love story.
    2. Reluctant poet: She hesitates to call herself a poet and has described much of her writing as “some heretic form of poetry”.
    3. Emotional detachment: She writes about desire, abandonment and bereavement without confessional warmth. Feeling arrives indirectly, through a Sappho fragment, a myth, a photograph or an abrupt change of form.
    4. Translations: She has translated Sappho, Euripides and other classical writers, most notably in If Not, Winter: Fragments of Sappho and An Oresteia.
    5. Classics as contemporary: Her work shows that the classics remain radically contemporary and that there is no single way to arrive at or dwell in poetry.

    Conclusion

    The literature prize recognises a writer who treats genre as optional and the classics as a living resource. The next announcement in the 2026 Nobel calendar is the Peace Prize.

    Back2Basics: Nobel Prize in Literature

    1. Origin: Created by the will of Alfred Nobel and first awarded in 1901.
    2. Selection: The Swedish Academy awards it, and its permanent secretary announced the 2026 winner in Stockholm.
    3. Prize money: 12 million Swedish kronor (about $1.2 million) per prize this year.
    4. Ceremony: Prizes are presented on 10 December, the anniversary of Nobel’s death.

    Matching Previous Year Question

    “[2026] ‘X’, born in the UK, was conferred the Nobel Prize in 2025. He was a professor in an American university when the prize was announced. Identify ‘X’: (a) Michel H. Devoret (b) Richard Robson (c) John Clarke (d) Joel Mokyr ANSWER: C”

More posts