💥UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (April Batch) + Access XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Search results for: “”

  • The Chartered Accountants, the Cost and Works Accountants and the Company Secretaries (Amendment) Bill, 2021

    Context

    The Lok Sabha has approved a Bill to amend the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, the law that governs the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI).

    What are the changes proposed in the Bill?

    • Introduced in the Lok Sabha on December 17, 2021, and titled the Chartered Accountants, the Cost and Works Accountants and the Company Secretaries (Amendment) Bill, 2021.
    • The key changes it proposes are in the area of discipline and governance and administration.
    • 1] Discipline: The ICAI’s disciplinary committee and board of discipline will be chaired by non-chartered accountants (CA),
    • Its elected council members will no longer be in a majority in them.
    • 2] Governance and administration: The term of the ICAI’s Council will be raised from three to four years, the maximum number of consecutive terms for its elected members will be reduced to two from the current three;
    • The ICAI’s Secretary will replace the ICAI’s president as its chief executive and perform the functions to be specified;
    • The ICAI will appoint its auditor from the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India’s panel of CA firms;
    • The Government will form a coordination committee for the ICAI and the Institutes of Cost Accountants and Company Secretaries of India.
    • The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance has endorsed these changes and has further recommended an end to the ICAI’s monopoly in certification.

    Challenges facing Chartered Accountancy and ICAI

    1] Lacking critical thinking and analytical ability

    • Senior industry managers say that many CAs do not have what it takes to succeed in the corporate world, i.e., analytical ability, critical thinking, appreciation of the business context, grasp of technology, and communication and presentation skills.
    • CA students do not have in-class interaction.
    • Also, the coaching is focused on cracking examinations rather than facilitating understanding and application.

    2] Poor record in disciplining members

    • The ICAI’s record in disciplining its members is even more problematic.
    • There have been persistent complaints that the ICAI is lax in acting against errant members.
    •  In 2018, the Government had set up the National Financial Reporting Authority as India’s first independent regulator of accounting and audit.
    • The proposed changes in the composition of the ICAI’s disciplinary arms will further limit its role.
    • As a result, the ICAI will be effectively reduced to an examination board.

    3] ICAI failed to keep pace with changes

    • The ICAI was set up in 1949, largely as the Indian version of the U.K. institute
    •  Much of the work that CAs do and clamour for is a remnant of the licence raj.
    • Many businesses and professions have changed beyond recognition as a result of the economic reforms initiated in 1991.
    •  The demutualised and technology-driven National Stock Exchange of India has transformed stock-broking.
    • Indian IT and pharma companies now compete successfully with the best in the world.
    • In contrast, CA has not kept pace with the changes in India’s dynamic economy and changing society.
    • Overseas accountancy qualifications such as the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA) and Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA) are gaining popularity in India, perhaps because they are recognised worldwide, are more relevant to current and future needs, and are accepted even in India by global companies and global accounting firms.

    4] Challenges posed by technology such as AI/ML

    • Accounting and auditing are more amenable to the replacement of humans by technology.
    • AI, robotics, and other technological advances are likely to reduce the need for human intervention in accounting.
    • Also, recent administrative reforms aimed at enabling ease of doing business and ease of living, such as faceless tax assessment, easy filing of tax returns, prompt refunds, rising threshold for tax audit, and abolition of Goods and Services Tax audit have greatly reduced the availability of captive, government-mandated, make-work business for CAs.

    Way forward

    • Setting IIAs: The Parliamentary Committee’s suggestion to set up a string of Indian Institutes of Accounting (IIAs) on the lines of the Indian Institutes of Technology (IIT) and the Indian Institutes of Management (IIM) is innovative.
    • At one level, they will end the ICAI’s statutory monopoly over certification.
    • More competition should result in better quality and higher standards of conduct.

    Conclusion

    The Bill and the Parliamentary Committee’s report can be seen as efforts to drag the ICAI to the contemporary world. It would be wise to read the proposed changes as a warning and respond maturely.

    UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • Significance of India-Australia Economic Cooperation and Trade Agreement

    Context

    Prime Ministers of India and Australis will preside virtually over the signing of a bilateral Free Trade Agreement(ECTA) negotiated in torturous detail over the last decade.

    Background

    • Negotiations for a bilateral Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement began in May 2011.
    • But the negotiations continued in fits and starts, without significant progress or indeed real political direction.
    • In June 2020, as part of the Joint Statement after establishing a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership, it was decided to re-engage on a CECA.
    • Consequently, at the 17th India-Australia Joint Ministerial Commission meeting in September 2021, CECA negotiations were re-launched.
    • During virtual summit in 2022, India-Australia fleshed out areas of cooperation ranging from science and technology to climate change and defence to people-to-people ties, and included possibilities of joint surveillance and real-time intelligence sharing.
    • On the eve of the summit, the Morrison government invested over USD 280 million to give a fillip to cooperation with India; to further grow its economic relationship and support jobs and businesses in both countries; as well as to empower the Indian diaspora.

    About INDAUS-ECTA

    • The INDAUS ECTA (India-Australia Economic Cooperation and Trade Agreement), reflects vision of the essential unity of the two countries.
    • The ECTA deal is apparently fully in compliance with WTO rules and Article 24 of GATT.
    • Article 24 of GATT allows countries to grant special treatment to one another by establishing a free-trade association, provided that “(1) duties and other trade restrictions would be eliminated on substantially all the trade among the participants, (2) the elimination of internal barriers occurred within a reasonable length of time….”
    • The ECTA should give a boost to India’s labour-intensive manufacturing sector, with a considerable leg-up to the pharma, textile, gemstone and jewellery sectors.
    •  Indian students in Australia will find an easier pathway to employment, and there will be greater ease of visa for a range of skilled human capital from India in demand in Australia, including chefs and yoga instructors.
    • Most of the farming and dairy sector seems to have been kept away from the present agreement.
    • Australian coal will probably get relatively unfettered access to India.

    Significance of the ECTA for India-Australia relations

    • The ECTA represents a watershed moment in bilateral relations.
    • ECTA is also a significant turning point for India’s foreign policy — both in terms of geo-strategy as well as geo-economics.
    • Partnership with the convergence of interests: India and Australia today represent a partnership with a near complete convergence of interests and values.
    • Shared concerns over China: Two multicultural, federal democracies that share concerns about stability in the Indo Pacific, are apprehensive about Chinese hegemonic designs, and are increasingly coordinating their policies, are natural partners of the future.

    Conclusion

    The ECTA signals that India’s relations with Australia — two central pivots of the Quad — are as strong and resilient as ever.

    UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • 31st March 2022 | Nikaalo Prelims- Environment Test 1: Acts & Policies; International institutions & initiatives; Misc

    [WpProQuiz 947]

    [WpProQuiz_toplist 947]

    UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • 31st March 2022 | Prelims Daily with Previous Year Questions

    [WpProQuiz 949]

    [WpProQuiz_toplist 949]

    UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • Assam-Meghalaya Boundary Dispute Resolution

    Assam and Meghalaya partially resolved a 50-year-old dispute along their 884.9 km boundary.

    What is the news?

    • An agreement was signed between Assam CM and his Meghalaya counterpart in the presence of Home Minister Amit Shah in New Delhi.
    • According to the partial boundary deal, Assam will get 18.51 sq. km of the 36.79 sq. km disputed area while Meghalaya will get the remaining 18.28 sq. km.
    • The agreement is expected to pave the way for resolving disputes in the boundary and similar areas of difference between Assam and three other NE States.

    What is the Assam-Meghalaya Boundary Dispute?

    • Meghalaya, carved out of Assam as an autonomous State in 1970, became a full-fledged State in 1972.
    • The creation of the new State was based on the Assam Reorganisation (Meghalaya) Act of 1969, which the Meghalaya government refused to accept.
    • This was because the Act followed the recommendations of a 1951 committee to define the boundary of Meghalaya.
    • On that panel’s recommendations, areas of the present-day East Jaintia Hills, Ri-Bhoi and West Khasi Hills districts of Meghalaya were transferred to the Karbi Anglong, Kamrup (metro) and Kamrup districts of Assam.
    • Meghalaya contested these transfers after statehood, claiming that they belonged to its tribal chieftains.
    • Assam said the Meghalaya government could neither provide documents nor archival materials to prove its claim over these areas.
    • After claims and counter-claims, the dispute was narrowed down to 12 sectors on the basis of an official claim by Meghalaya in 2011.

    Other boundary disputes in North-East

    The states of the Northeast were largely carved out of Assam, which has border disputes with several states.

    During British rule, Assam included present-day Nagaland, Arunachal Pradesh and Meghalaya besides Mizoram, which became separate state one by one. Today, Assam has boundary problems with each of them.

    • Nagaland shares a 500-km boundary with Assam.
    • In two major incidents of violence in 1979 and 1985, at least 100 persons were killed. The boundary dispute is now in the Supreme Court
    • On the Assam-Arunachal Pradesh boundary (over 800 km), clashes were first reported in 1992, according to the same research paper.
    • Since then, there have been several accusations of illegal encroachment from both sides, and intermittent clashes. This boundary issue is being heard by the Supreme Court.
    • The 884-km Assam-Meghalaya boundary, too, witnesses flare-ups frequently. As per Meghalaya government statements, today there are 12 areas of dispute between the two states.

     How did the two governments go about handling the issue?

    • The two States had initially tried resolving the border dispute through negotiations but the first serious attempt was in May 1983 when they formed a joint official committee to address the issue.
    • In its report submitted in November 1983, the committee suggested that the Survey of India should re-delineate the boundary with the cooperation of both the States towards settling the dispute.
    • There was no follow-up action. As more areas began to be disputed, the two States agreed to the constitution of an independent panel in 1985.
    • Headed by Justice Y.V. Chandrachud, the committee submitted its report in 1987.
    • Meghalaya rejected the report as it was allegedly pro-Assam.
    • In 2019, the Meghalaya government petitioned the Supreme Court to direct the Centre to settle the dispute. The petition was dismissed.

    How was the ice broken?

    • In January 2021, Home Minister urged all the north-eastern States to resolve their boundary disputes by August 15, 2022, when the country celebrates 75 years of Independence.
    • It was felt that the effort could be fast-tracked since the region’s sister-States either had a common ruling party.
    • In June 2021, the two States decided to resume talks at the CM level and adopt a “give-and-take” policy to settle the disputes once and for all.
    • Of the 12 disputed sectors, six “less complicated” areas — Tarabari, Gizang, Hahim, Boklapara, Khanapara-Pilingkata and Ratacherra — were chosen for resolving in the first phase.
    • Both States formed three regional committees, one each for a district affected by the disputed sectors.

    What were the principles followed?

    • These committees, each headed by a cabinet minister, were given “five principles” for approaching the issue.
    • These principles are historical facts of a disputed sector, ethnicity, and administrative convenience, willingness of people and contiguity of land preferably with natural boundaries such as rivers, streams and rocks.
    • The committee members conducted surveys of the disputed sectors and held several meetings with the local stakeholders.
    • This paved the way for the March 29 closure of the six disputed sectors.

    Issues with this settlement

    • Officials in Assam said it was better to let go of areas where they did not have any administrative control rather than “live with an irritant forever”.
    • However, residents in the other six disputed sectors feel the “give-and-take” template could spell disaster for them.
    • The fear is more among non-tribal people who could end up living in a “tribal Meghalaya with no rights”.

     

    UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • India’s Lithium Dependency Worries

    Lithium has been among the most sought-after mineral during the past few years, largely on the back of its usage in battery manufacturing.

    India is at odds with a major import source for the mineral, China.

    About Lithium

    • Lithium is a chemical element with the symbol Li and atomic number 3.
    • It is a soft, silvery-white alkali metal. Under standard conditions, it is the lightest metal and the lightest solid element.
    • Like all alkali metals, lithium is highly reactive and flammable and must be stored in mineral oil.
    • When cut, it exhibits a metallic lustre, but moist air corrodes it quickly to a dull silvery grey, then black tarnish.
    • Lithium metal is isolated electrolytically from a mixture of lithium chloride and potassium chloride.
    • It is a crucial building block of the lithium-ion rechargeable batteries that power electric vehicles (EVs), laptops and mobile phones.

    Lithium-ion batteries

    • A lithium-ion battery or Li-ion battery is a type of rechargeable battery.
    • They are commonly used for portable electronics and electric vehicles and are growing in popularity for military and aerospace applications.
    • A prototype Li-ion battery was developed by Akira Yoshino in 1985, based on earlier research by John Goodenough, M. Stanley Whittingham, Rachid Yazami and Koichi Mizushima during the 1970s–1980s.
    • In 2019, the Nobel Prize in Chemistry was given to this trio “for the development of lithium-ion batteries”.

    Global producers of lithium

    • Australia and Chile have swapped positions as the world’s leading lithium-producing country over the past decade. In 2019, the world’s Top 5 lithium producers were:
    1. Australia – 52.9% of global production
    2. Chile – 21.5%
    3. China – 9.7%
    4. Argentina – 8.3%
    5. Zimbabwe – 2.1%
    • The U.S. ranked 7th with 1.2% of the world’s lithium production.
    • In 2019, the world’s Top 5 lithium reserves by country were:
    1. Chile – 55.5% of the world’s total
    2. Australia – 18.1%
    3. Argentina – 11.0%
    4. China – 6.5%
    5. U.S. – 4.1%

    Why is India looking for lithium?

    • India has been scouting for lithium reserves since the Centre’s push to boost the adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) in the country.
    • The ₹18,000 crore production-linked incentive scheme for advanced chemistry cell (ACC) battery storage, a flagship incentive scheme for the industry has kicked off.
    • However, the supply of lithium, which is largely an imported product, has declined.
    • With India being in a diplomatic tussle with China, the supplies from the neighbouring country have declined and India too is looking for other import avenues.

    Why has the supply of lithium declined?

    • The supply of lithium has not been in line with the surge in demand from electric vehicle makers across the world.
    • China also is witnessing a mismatch between demand and supply, which has led to a rise in prices.

     

    UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • Social media platforms must be held accountable for subjugating rights: Centre to HC

    The Centre told the Delhi High Court that social media platforms must be held accountable for “subjugating and supplanting fundamental rights like the right to freedom of speech and expression, otherwise the same would have dire consequences for any democratic nation”.

    What is the news?

    • The Ministry’s submission came in response to a petition filed by a Twitter user whose account was suspended by the microblogging site for alleged violations of platform guidelines.
    • The Twitter user said his account was suspended for the reason of “ban evasion” (creating an account when a similar account was earlier banned).
    • The complainant said Twitter suspended his accounts without giving him an opportunity for a hearing.

    Centre’s argument

    • The Centre said when a Significant Social Media Intermediary (SSMI) such as Twitter takes a decision to suspend the whole or part of a user’s account on its own due to its policy violation, it should afford a reasonable opportunity to the user to defend his side.
    • The exception, the Centre said, where the SSMIs could take such a decision include certain scenarios such as rape, sexually explicit material or child sexual abuse material, bot activity or malware, terrorism-related content etc.
    • If an SSMI fails to comply with the above, then it may amount to a violation of IT Rules 2021, the Centre clarified.
    • No platform or intermediary will be allowed to infringe upon the citizens’ rights, including but not limited to Articles 14, 19 and 21 guaranteed under the Constitution of India under the guise of violation of the platform’s policies unless it constitutes a violation of extant law in force.

    What are the IT Rules 2021?

    Why is this a matter of concern?

    • Social media platforms must respect the fundamental rights of the citizens and should not take down the account itself or completely suspend the user account in all cases.
    • Taking down the whole information or the user account should be a last resort.
    • Only in cases where the majority of the contents/posts/tweets on an account are unlawful, the platform may take the extreme step of taking down the whole information or suspending the whole account.

    Conclusion

    • Hence it can be argued that undue discontinuance of social media accounts of any person is violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 19 and 21.

     

    UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • What is Project NETRA?

    The Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) is building up its orbital debris tracking capability by deploying new radars and optical telescopes under the Network for Space Objects Tracking and Analysis (NETRA) project.

    Project NETRA

    • The project will give India its own capability in space situational awareness (SSA) like the other space powers — which is used to ‘predict’ threats from debris to Indian satellites.
    • NETRA’s eventual goal is to capture the GEO, or geostationary orbit, scene at 36,000 km where communication satellites operate.
    • The initial SSA will first be for low-earth orbits or LEO which have remote-sensing spacecraft.
    • Under NETRA the ISRO plans to put up many observational facilities: connected radars, telescopes; data processing units and a control centre.
    • They can, among others, spot, track and catalogue objects as small as 10 cm, up to a range of 3,400 km and equal to a space orbit of around 2,000 km.
    • The NETRA effort would make India a part of international efforts towards tracking, warning about and mitigating space debris.

    What NETRA consists of?

    • In the plans are a high-precision, long range telescope in Leh and a radar in the North East.
    • Along with them, we will also use the Multi-Object Tracking Radar (MOTR) that we have put up at the Satish Dhawan Space Centre in Sriharikota, and the telescopes at Ponmudi and Mount Abu to get a broad SSA picture.
    • NORAD, or the North American Aerospace Defense Command, is an initiative of the U.S. and Canada that shares selective debris data with many countries.
    • The new SSA centre would consolidate debris tracking activities that are now spread across ISRO centres.
    • Currently there are 15 functional Indian communication satellites in the geostationary orbit of 36,000 km; 13 remote sensing satellites in LEO of up to 2,000 km; and eight navigation satellites in medium earth orbits.

    Why Space debris matters?

    • Space junk or debris consists of spent rocket stages, dead satellites, fragments of space objects and debris resulting from ASAT.
    • Hurtling at an average speed of 27,000 kmph in LEO, these objects pose a very real threat as collisions involving even centimetre-sized fragments can be lethal to satellites.
    • Last year, ISRO monitored 4,382 events in LEO and 3,148 events in the geostationary orbit where space objects closely approached Indian assets.
    • Fragments from the Fengyun-1C satellite (part of the anti-satellite test (ASAT) by China in 2007) and the Cosmos 2251-Iridium satellite collision in 2009 accounted for the maximum number of these threats.
    • The observations also covered 84 “close approaches of less than one km” between Starlink satellites and Indian assets.

    Enhancing Space situational awareness (SSA)

    • India, as a responsible space power, should have SSA as a part of a national capability, as in the U.S. This is a vital requirement for protecting our space assets and a force multiplier.
    • The SSA has a military quotient to it and adds a new ring to the country’s overall security.
    • It uses satellites, ground and air radars to secure its two countries against attacks from air, space or sea.
    • With long-range tracking radars, the SSA also provides us the capability of an early warning system against ballistic missiles coming in at a height.
    • Apart from radars and telescopes, he said India should also think of deploying satellites that track other satellites — as the U.S. and other space powers had done.
    • Combined with other elements of military intelligence SSA would help us to understand motives behind any suspicious orbit changes of other satellites and to know if they were spying on or harming our spacecraft.

     

    UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

  • Prelims Spotlight: Important Temples/Monasteries/Stupas/Caves

    Dear Aspirants,

    This Spotlight is a part of our Mission Nikaalo Prelims-2022.

    You can check the broad timetable of Nikaalo Prelims here

    Session Details

    Morning 12 PM  – Prelims Spotlight Session

    Evening 06:30  PM  – TIKDAM/MCQs Session

    Noon 03:00 PM – CSAT Google Meet Session

    Evening 08 PM  – Tests on Alternate Days

    Join our Official telegram channel for Study material for GS and CSAT Here

    31st Mar 2022

    1. Important Temples/Monasteries/Stupa/Caves- Click2view

    2. Important Historical Sculptures- Click2view

  • [Sansad TV] Perspective – NLMC: Utilising Unused Land

    UPSC 2022 countdown has begun! Get your personal guidance plan now! (Click here)

    Context

    Earlier this month, the Union Cabinet has approved the setting up of the National Land Monetization Corporation (NLMC) to monetize surplus land and building assets of Central Public Sector Enterprises (CPSEs) and other agencies linked to the Government.

    In this article, we will study how effective is this going to be, considering land monetization is a complex process, what potential challenges could NLMC face in the whole process, what roles and responsibilities will this separate agency be entrusted with?

    What is NLMC?

    • The NLMC will be a firm, fully owned by the government, to carry out the monetisation of government and public sector assets in the form of surplus, unused or underused land assets.
    • It will fall under the administrative jurisdiction of the Ministry of Finance.
    • It will be set up with an initial authorised share capital of ₹5,000 crore and a paid-up capital of ₹150 crore.
    • Surplus land and building assets of CPSEs are expected to be transferred to the NLMC, which will then hold, manage and monetise them.

    Functions of NLMC

    The NLMC will-

    1. Monetize underutilised or unused land parcels of Central Public Sector Enterprises (CPSEs)
    2. Facilitate the monetisation of assets belonging to PSUs that have ceased operations or are in line for a strategic disinvestment
    3. Act as an advisory body and support other government entities and CPSEs in identifying their surplus non-core assets

    Benefits offered

    • Speeding up disinvestment: The setting of the NLMC will speed up the closure process of the CPSEs and smoothen the strategic disinvestment process.
    • Productive utilization of stagnant assets: It will also enable productive utilisation of these under-utilised assets by setting in motion private sector investments.
    • Easing up of finances: It will boost new economic activities such as industrialisation, boosting the local economy by generating employment and generating resources for potential economic and social infrastructure.
    • Maximum value realization: It will help monetising them in an efficient and professional manner, maximising the scope of value realisation.

    What does monetization mean?

    • When the government monetises its assets, it essentially means that it is transferring the revenue rights of the asset (could be idle land, infrastructure, PSU) to a private player for a specified period of time.
    • In such a transaction, the government gets in return an:
    • Upfront payment from the private entity
    • Regular share of the revenue generated from the asset
    • Promise of steady investment into the asset, and
    • Title rights to the monetised asset

    Why need monetization?

    There are different reasons why the government monetizes its assets.

    • Revenue shortfall: One of them is to create new sources of revenue.
    • Pandemic damage control: The economy has already been hit due to the coronavirus pandemic and revenues are essential to fulfil the Modi government’s target of achieving a $5 trillion economy.
    • Risk management: Monetisation is also done to unlock the potential of unused or underused assets by involving institutional investors or private players.
    • Capital generation: It is also done to generate resources or capital for future asset creation, such as using the money generated from monetisation to create new infrastructure projects.

    Need for NLMC

    • Professional dealing in negotiations: The firm will hire professionals from the private sector with a merit based approach
    • Market expertise: Asset monetisation of real estate requires expertise in valuation of property, market research, investment banking, land management, legal diligence and other related skill sets.
    • Global best practices: NLMC will undertake monetisation as an agency function and is expected to act as a directory of best practices in land monetisation.

    How much land is currently available for monetization?

    • According to the Economic Survey 2021-2022, as of now, CPSEs have put nearly 3,400 acres of land on the table for potential monetisation.
    • They have referred this land to the Department of Investment and Public Asset Management (DIPAM).
    • As per the survey, monetisation of non-core assets of PSUs such as MTNL, BSNL, BPCL, B&R, BEML, HMT Ltd, Instrumentation Ltd etc. are at different stages.

    Challenges to the NLMC

    (a) Volatile market situation

    • The performance and productivity of the NLMC will also depend on the government’s performance on its disinvestment targets.
    • For example, the Life Insurance Corporation IPO, which was supposed to raise ₹60,000 crore is now shrouded in uncertainty owing to the Russia-Ukraine crisis making stock markets volatile.
    • If the IPO does not hit the markets by the end of March, the government would be missing its disinvestment targets by a wide margin.

    (b) Issues with the transfer of rights

    • The process of asset monetisation does not end when the government transfers revenue rights to private players.
    • Identifying profitable revenue streams for the monetised land assets, ensuring adequate investment by the private player and setting up a dispute-resolution mechanism are also important tasks.

    (c) Unattractiveness of PPP Model

    • Posing as another potential challenge would be the use of Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) as a monetisation model.
    • For instance, the results of the Centre’s PPP initiative launched in 2020 for the Railways were not encouraging.
    • It had invited private parties to run 150 trains of the Indian Railways but when bids were thrown open, nine clusters of trains saw no bidders.

    Criticisms of NLMC

    • It militates philosophy of privatisation: PM has propounded more than once: the business of government is not business. Setting up a CPSE to help sell or shut down the existing CPSEs doesn’t appear quite congruous.
    • Privatisation process is not new: Dozens of companies have been sold; in many more, minority stakes have been offloaded. So, if the existing process has served so well, why try something new?
    • Conflict of interest: NLMC may have a turf war with the Department of Investment and Public Asset Management (DIPAM) which is tasked with similar functions.  
    • Nature of NLMC: The government organs tend to acquire a life of their own.  The National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) is a case in point. It was supposed to be wound up in two years but still getting extensions.
    • Public land being sold: Publicly owned lands in a democracy are literally owned by the public. They are held in trust on behalf of the public by governments or government agencies.
    • Sale of crucial assets: Land holdings are one of the government’s most significant tangible assets, whether owned by central ministries, state governments, public sector undertakings or local bodies.

    Way forward

    • There is a need to monetise non-core unused and under-used assets that would help the government generate substantial revenues.
    • For CPSEs undergoing strategic disinvestment or closure, monetisation of these stagnant surplus land and non-core assets is important to unlock their value.
    • There is a need to create a comprehensive inventory of public land and synergize the existing Government Land Information System (GLIS).

More posts