💥UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (April Batch) + Access XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Search results for: “”

  • Giving shape to the University of the Future    

    Why in the news?

    The National Education Policy aims to transform India’s separate higher education system by creating large institutions that offer education across multiple fields.

    What distinguishes multidisciplinary, cross-disciplinary, and interdisciplinary approaches in higher education?

    Approach Description Example (Eg)
    Multidisciplinary Involves multiple disciplines working together, but each maintains its own methods and boundaries. Eg: A team of economists, biologists, and engineers working on a project about climate change, but each discipline works separately within their own domain.
    Cross-disciplinary Encourages collaboration between disciplines but without integrating their knowledge. Eg: An educationist and an economist working together on a project, but they maintain their individual disciplinary perspectives without merging them.
    Interdisciplinary Integrates concepts, methods, and frameworks from different disciplines to create a unified approach. Eg: A course titled “Environmental Economics” combining economics, environmental science, and sociology to address climate change through an integrated perspective.

    Why must single-stream institutions be phased out under the National Education Policy?

    • Encouraging Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration: Single-stream institutions focus only on one discipline, limiting students’ exposure to other fields. Phasing them out encourages the integration of various disciplines, fostering collaboration. Eg: A single-stream commerce college could partner with a neighboring arts college, allowing students to explore subjects like economics and sociology alongside their commerce studies.
    • Expanding Knowledge and Skill Sets: Multidisciplinary institutions allow students to develop a broader skill set by learning from multiple disciplines, enhancing their adaptability and problem-solving abilities. Eg: A student in a multidisciplinary university could take courses in both computer science and environmental studies, enabling them to work on tech-driven solutions for environmental issues.
    • Meeting Global Educational Standards: Single-stream institutions limit the scope of education, whereas multidisciplinary campuses are more aligned with global trends in higher education that emphasize holistic, well-rounded learning. Eg: In top global universities, students often have the flexibility to take courses from diverse fields, making them more versatile and better prepared for complex, real-world challenges.

    How can Indian universities promote cross-disciplinary learning and collaboration?

    • Encouraging Joint Courses and Programs: Indian universities can create joint courses and programs that combine subjects from different disciplines, allowing students to explore connections between fields and work on collaborative projects. Eg: A course titled “Sustainability in Urban Planning” could combine inputs from urban studies, environmental science, and economics, encouraging students to approach problems from multiple perspectives.
    • Fostering Collaborative Research Projects: Universities should establish research centers and projects that bring together faculty and students from different disciplines to work on solving real-world challenges, promoting cross-disciplinary collaboration. Eg: A research project focused on public health could involve faculty from medicine, economics, sociology, and environmental science to address issues like the spread of infectious diseases in urban areas.

    Who plays a crucial role in fostering interdisciplinary thinking?

    • Faculty Members: Professors and researchers play a crucial role in fostering interdisciplinary thinking by encouraging students to approach problems from multiple disciplinary angles and by designing courses and projects that integrate knowledge from different fields. Eg: A professor from the economics department might collaborate with faculty from environmental science and sociology to create a course on “Environmental Economics,” encouraging students to consider both economic policies and environmental impacts in solving global challenges.
    • University Administration: University leaders and administrators can support interdisciplinary thinking by creating structures that promote cross-department collaboration, offering funding for interdisciplinary research, and ensuring that the curriculum encourages interaction across disciplines. Eg: A university may establish an “Interdisciplinary Research Fund” to support projects that involve multiple departments.

    What challenges do they face in current academic structures?

    • Rigid Departmental Boundaries: Traditional departments often have defined areas of focus, making collaboration difficult across disciplines. Eg: A physics department may not easily partner with a social sciences department on a project related to climate change impacts.
    • Lack of Incentives for Interdisciplinary Work: Faculty members are primarily rewarded for publishing in their specific discipline, not for interdisciplinary research. Eg: A researcher in environmental science might find it hard to get recognition for a joint paper with a computer science expert on climate modeling.
    • Limited Interdisciplinary Training for Faculty: Many professors are trained and specialize in a single discipline, which hinders their ability to teach or engage in interdisciplinary approaches. Eg: An economics professor may not have the skills to incorporate concepts from sociology or political science into their curriculum.

    Way forward: 

    • Integrating Interdisciplinary Curriculum: Universities should design flexible curricula that allow students and faculty to take courses and engage in research across disciplines, breaking traditional academic silos.
    • Incentivizing Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration: Establish funding programs and academic recognition for interdisciplinary research to motivate faculty and students to work across departmental boundaries.

    Mains PYQ: 

    [UPSC 2020] National Education Policy 2020 is in conformity with the Sustainable Development Goal-4 (2030). It intends to restructure and reorient education system in India. Critically examine the statement.

    Linkage: Multidisciplinary universities need to be established to reach the goal by 2030, aligning with the timeframe of SDG-4. This question directly talk about the NEP 2020’s intent to restructure and reorient the education system, which is central to the idea of shaping the university of the future.

  • The conservation argument for resurrecting dire wolf is not credible

    Why in the news?

    Colossal Biosciences is an American company that combines genetics and conservation in a unique way by bringing back species that have been extinct for thousands of years.

    What is the primary goal of Colossal Biosciences’ de-extinction project?

    Colossal Biosciences is a biotechnology company specializing in de-extinction projects, aiming to revive extinct species through advanced genetic engineering.

    • Woolly Mammoth De-Extinction: Colossal is working to resurrect the woolly mammoth by integrating mammoth genes into the Asian elephant genome using CRISPR technology. The goal is to create a cold-resistant elephant with traits characteristic of the woolly mammoth, such as a thick layer of fat and shaggy hair, to inhabit Arctic tundra regions and potentially combat climate change.
    • Dire Wolf Revival: In a groundbreaking achievement, Colossal announced the birth of three pups—Romulus, Remus, and Khaleesi—genetically engineered to resemble the extinct dire wolf. Using DNA from ancient dire wolf remains, scientists edited the genes of modern gray wolves, resulting in animals that exhibit traits such as larger size and distinctive fur color.

    Why do critics question the credibility of reviving extinct species for conservation purposes?

    • Lack of Scientific Proof: The actual success of reviving extinct species like the woolly mammoth has not yet been proven through rigorous peer review or established results.
    • Limited Genetic Editing: The extent of genetic editing in revived species often involves only a small number of genes, leading to incomplete or flawed replicas of the original species. Eg: In the case of the dire wolf, only 20 genes were edited, resulting in what critics describe as just a “strange-looking gray wolf” rather than a true de-extinct species.
    • Ethical Concerns: There are ethical debates over the potential consequences of creating species that may not thrive in the modern environment or might cause unforeseen ecological imbalances. Eg: The introduction of revived species like the woolly mammoth could disrupt current ecosystems in ways that may not be beneficial.

    How can bringing back the woolly mammoth help stop global warming?

    • Restoring Grasslands: The woolly mammoth can help restore Arctic grasslands by grazing on shrubs and plants, which would create open grasslands where permafrost can remain intact. Eg: By grazing, mammoths would prevent the growth of shrubs that trap heat, promoting the return of grasslands that are cooler and better at reflecting sunlight.
    • Slowing Permafrost Melt: Grasslands absorb less heat than shrub forests, helping to keep the permafrost cool. The return of woolly mammoths could help prevent the thawing of permafrost, which releases methane, a potent greenhouse gas. Eg: Mammoth grazing can keep the ground cooler and slow the thawing of permafrost, thus reducing the release of methane into the atmosphere.
    • Preventing Methane Emissions: As the permafrost melts, it releases large amounts of methane into the atmosphere. Woolly mammoths could help mitigate this by maintaining ecosystems that slow down the permafrost’s thaw. Eg: With mammoths grazing, the tundra could remain cooler and less prone to releasing methane.
    • Enhancing Carbon Sequestration: Grasslands are more effective at absorbing carbon than shrubbery or forested areas. By converting tundra back into grasslands, woolly mammoths could enhance carbon sequestration and help store more carbon in the soil. Eg: Woolly mammoths could help re-establish healthy grasslands, which would act as carbon sinks, absorbing more CO2 from the atmosphere.

    What is India’s situation in advanced genetic engineering?

    • Advancements in Agricultural Biotechnology: India has developed a structured regulatory framework for genetically modified organisms (GMOs) under the Environment (Protection) Act, of 1986. Eg: Recently, India initiated trials of CRISPR/Cas9-modified rice varieties in test fields, reflecting a surge in scientific research and innovation in plant genome editing.
    • Pioneering Genomic Research and Precision Medicine: India’s Genome India Project aims to sequence at least 10,000 Indian genomes to develop predictive diagnostic indicators for various diseases. Eg: Institutions like the Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology (IGIB) have been instrumental in understanding genetic epidemiology, including the development of the FELUDA COVID-19 test based on CRISPR technology.

    Way forward: 

    • Strengthen Ethical and Regulatory Frameworks: India should establish robust regulations and ethical guidelines for genetic engineering, particularly for gene-editing technologies like CRISPR, to ensure safety and sustainability in areas such as agriculture and medicine.
    • Promote Collaborative Research and Innovation: Encouraging partnerships between academic institutions, the private sector, and the government will help accelerate research and application of advanced genetic technologies, positioning India as a global leader in biotechnology innovation.

    Mains PYQ: 

    [UPSC 2024] What strategies have been developed to prevent such a catastrophe [mass extinction of life]?

    Linkage: The article says we should focus more on saving the species that are alive today, rather than trying to bring back extinct ones. The debate about de-extinction raises the question of whether it’s better to spend resources on protecting current species instead.

  • Who was Mahatma Jyotiba Phule (1827-1890)?

    Why in the News?

    On April 11, 2025, the Prime Minister paid tribute to Mahatma Jyotiba Phule on his 199th birth anniversary.

    Who was Jyotiba Phule (1827-1890)?

    About Mahatma Phule

    • Jyotirao Govindrao Phule, born on April 11, 1827, near Pune, was from the Mali caste.
    • His father was a vegetable vendor, and his mother died when he was young.
    • He pursued education at the Scottish Mission High School in Pune despite caste-based discrimination.
    • He was inspired by Western thinkers like Thomas Paine and John Stuart Mill, fuelling his social justice dedication.
    • At 13, he married Savitribai Phule, who became his partner in social reforms, particularly promoting education for women and marginalized communities.

    His Contributions as a Social Reformer:

    Educational Reforms:

    • In 1848, Phule and his wife established India’s first girls’ school in Pune.
    • He focused on educating Dalits and lower-caste groups, traditionally excluded from education.
    • He founded night schools for working-class individuals, especially women.

    Fighting Caste Discrimination:

    • Phule criticized the caste system, calling it a means of oppression.
    • In 1873, Phule’s book Gulamgiri condemned caste discrimination, comparing Dalits’ plight to slavery.
    • Phule coined the term ‘Dalit’ to describe those outside the caste system.

    Women’s Welfare and Empowerment:

    • Phule advocated for widow remarriage and provided a dignified life for widows.
    • In 1863, he opened homes to help pregnant widows.
    • He co-founded an infanticide prevention center, tackling the killing of female infants.

    Social Justice and Equality:

    • Phule founded Satyashodhak Samaj in 1873 to promote social equality, rational thinking, and religious reform.
    • The Samaj rejected idolatry and supported a more rational spiritual approach.
    • He broke the social stigma of untouchability by opening his house and water-well to the oppressed.

    Religious and Philosophical Contributions:

    • Phule was an advocate for critical thinking of religion, rejecting superstition and blind faith.
    • He believed in equality and justice across religions and cultures.
    • He was influenced by Bhakti saints like Sant Kabir and Sant Tukaram in his fight against social oppression.

    His Literary Contributions:

    • Gulamgiri (Slavery) (1873): Critiqued the caste system and called for Dalit liberation.
    • Shetkaryacha Asud (Farmer’s Whip) (1881): Addressed the exploitation of farmers and advocated for land reforms.
    • Sarvajanik Satya Dharma Poostak: Promoted rationalist thought and social justice.
    • Tritiya Ratna (1855): A significant work in advocating for social equality.
    • Brahmananche Kasab (1869): Criticized the exploitation by the Brahmin class.
    • Powada: Chatrapati Shivajiraje Bhosle Yancha (1869): A work celebrating the legacy of Shivaji Maharaj.
    • Satsar Ank (1885): Another rationalist work addressing societal issues.
    • Akhandadi Kavyarachana: A literary contribution reflecting Phule’s thoughts on social justice.
    [UPSC 2016] Satya Shodhak Samaj organized:

    (a) a movement for the upliftment of tribals in Bihar’

    (b) a temple-entry movement in Gujarat

    (c) an anti-caste movement in Maharashtra

    (d) a peasant movement in Punjab

     

  • SAARC Development Fund (SDF)

    Why in the News?

    With recent cuts in USAID funding the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) Development Fund (SDF), with a capital base of $672 million and $1.5 billion in authorized funds, is gaining attention.

    About the SAARC Development Fund (SDF):

    • The SDF was established in 2010 by SAARC member countries: Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka.
    • It focuses on social, economic, and infrastructure development across SAARC countries.
    • It has evolved from SAARC Fund for Regional Projects (SFRP) and SAARC Regional Fund (SRF) proposed in 1990.
    • In 2005, the SDF was reconstituted as the umbrella financial mechanism for all SAARC projects.
    • Finally, it was endorsed in 2006; Charter signed in 2008 during the 15th SAARC Summit in Colombo.
    • Its permanent Secretariat opened in Thimphu, Bhutan, in 2010.

    Funding Mechanism:

    • The SDF has authorized funds of $1.5 billion, with a capital base of $672 million.
    • It aims to expand its credit portfolio to $300 million in the coming years.
    • Member countries contribute to the SDF’s capital, and the funds are allocated for regional projects based on proposals from member states.
    • It operates on a collaborative funding model, with contributions from both the government and development partners.
    [UPSC 2016] The term ‘Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership’ often appears in the news in the context of the affairs of a group of countries known as:

    (a) G20 (b) ASEAN (c) SCO (d) SAARC

     

  • Summit Diplomacy: India’s Global Spotlight or a Diplomatic Gamble ?

    N4S: India’s big summits often grab headlines, but their real impact lies in shaping global politics. UPSC tests whether aspirants can go beyond buzzwords and understand how diplomacy translates into power shifts. Memorizing summit names isn’t enough—what matters is connecting them to India’s strategic positioning, as seen in questions like India as an alternative to China in GS2 (2024). This article unpacks Summit Diplomacy, looking at events like Howdy Modi, the India-UAE trade deal, and Modi-Xi meetings. Have these truly boosted India’s global influence, or are they just political spectacle? Why didn’t the Wuhan summit stop the Galwan clash? While highlighting successes like India’s G20 leadership, it also examines the risks—over-relying on personal diplomacy and missing long-term follow-through.What makes this piece special? It cuts through the fluff. It shows why strong institutions – like the Ministry of External Affairs and research think tanks – matter more than handshakes and photo ops. If you’ve ever wondered whether these summits actually change anything, this article gives you the answers.

    PYQ ANCHORING

    1. The West is fostering India as an alternative to reduce dependence on China’s supply chain and as a strategic ally to counter China’s political and economic dominance.’ Explain this statement with examples. [GS 2, 2024]

    MICROTHEME: Geo-politics affecting India’s Interest

    When Donald Trump and Kim Jong-un met in Singapore in 2018, the world watched with bated breath. The historic summit promised a breakthrough in U.S.-North Korea relations, with bold commitments and glowing headlines. But within months, the promises fizzled, tensions resurfaced, and the grand spectacle turned into yet another footnote in diplomatic history.

    Similarly, India has engaged in high-profile summits like Howdy Modi, Wuhan talks, and G20/SCO meetings, shaping its foreign policy. But the big question remains: Are these summits truly driving India’s global rise, or are they just diplomatic theatre without lasting substance? Is India building a strong institutional framework to sustain its global momentum, or is it overly dependent on the personal rapport of its leaders?

    Summit Diplomacy and India: A Critical Analysis

    Big diplomatic meetings have helped India build strong partnerships, handle conflicts, and boost its global presence. But they also come with risks—depending too much on flashy events and making deals that don’t always lead to real change.

    Benefits for India

    BenefitImpact on IndiaExample
    Stronger Global RelationshipsExpanded diplomatic reach through direct leader engagements.‘Howdy Modi’ (2019) strengthened Indo-U.S. ties.
    Economic and Trade GainsFacilitated FDI, trade agreements, and technology transfers.India-UAE CEPA (2022) boosted trade relations.
    Security and Defense TiesStrengthened defense cooperation, intelligence sharing, and maritime security.India-France defense summits led to the Rafale jet deal.
    Crisis ManagementHelped in conflict resolution and stabilizing border tensions.Modi-Xi informal summits (2018, 2019) aimed at easing India-China tensions.
    Global LeadershipPositioned India as a key player in climate action, global health, and governance.India’s G20 Presidency (2023) championed Global South issues.

    Challenges and Limitations of Summit Diplomacy for India

    ChallengeImpact on IndiaExample
    Risk of Superficial AgreementsLack of follow-up mechanisms leads to poor implementation.India-China Wuhan & Mamallapuram summits failed to prevent the 2020 Galwan clash.
    Over-Reliance on Personal DiplomacyLeader-driven diplomacy can cause policy shifts with leadership changes.Modi-Nawaz Sharif ties (2015 Lahore visit) soured after Pulwama (2019).
    Geopolitical Constraints & Strategic MistrustSummits alone cannot resolve deep-rooted tensions.India-China border tensions persist despite multiple summits.
    Limited Impact on Multilateral NegotiationsGlobal power dynamics often block India’s diplomatic goals.India’s bid for a permanent UNSC seat remains unresolved despite summit efforts.
    Symbolic vs. Substantive GainsSome summits focus more on optics than real outcomes.BRICS Summits produce many declarations but limited economic cooperation.

    Bridging Gaps in Summit Diplomacy: The Case for Institutionalization

    Diplomacy isn’t just about big meetings and handshakes—it needs a solid foundation to create real, lasting impact. When foreign policy is backed by strong institutions, it becomes more stable, accountable, and less dependent on individual leaders. This helps avoid impulsive decisions and ensures that agreements actually lead to meaningful change instead of just being symbolic.

    India has been making diplomacy more structured by:

    AreaInstitutional MechanismImpact
    Foreign Policy FormulationMinistry of External Affairs (MEA) with specialized divisions (e.g., Economic Diplomacy, Multilateral Affairs)Ensures structured policy-making and coordination across global engagements.
    Strategic DiplomacyThink tanks like Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (IDSA), Observer Research Foundation (ORF), and Research and Information System for Developing Countries (RIS) advising policymakersProvides research-backed inputs for foreign policy decisions.
    Economic & Trade DiplomacyBilateral Investment Treaties (BITs), Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreements (CEPAs), and Free Trade Agreement (FTA) negotiationsInstitutionalizes trade partnerships beyond summit announcements.
    Multilateral EngagementsPermanent Missions at the United Nations (UN), World Trade Organization (WTO), Group of Twenty (G20) Sherpa MechanismEnhances India’s global presence in decision-making forums.
    Defense & Security DiplomacyStrategic dialogues (e.g., 2+2 Dialogue with the United States (U.S.), Japan), Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (QUAD), Indian Ocean Region (IOR) Defense CooperationStrengthens long-term security partnerships beyond leader-led summits.
    Diaspora & Cultural DiplomacyPravasi Bharatiya Divas (PBD), Indian Council for Cultural Relations (ICCR)Institutionalized outreach to the Indian diaspora and cultural promotion.

    Success Stories of India

    India has seen real success in diplomacy when strong systems back summits. This approach ensures that agreements lead to long-term results rather than just talk. Deals like the Indo-US Nuclear Agreement and the International Solar Alliance prove that structured efforts bring lasting impact. Here are some key examples:

    SummitSuccess Factors (Role of Institutionalization)Key Outcomes
    Indo-US Civil Nuclear Deal (2008)Strong support from the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), strategic alignment with the U.S., and bipartisan backing in both nations.Gave India access to nuclear technology despite not being a Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) signatory, boosting energy security.
    India-Africa Forum Summit (2008, 2011, 2015, 2023)Regularized engagements, structured financial commitments, and long-term diplomatic partnerships.Strengthened economic, educational, and strategic ties between India and Africa.
    Look East to Act East Policy (Since 1992, Revamped in 2014)Institutionalized through Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) summits, structured trade deals, and consistent engagement.Deepened trade, defense, and regional security ties with Southeast Asia.
    International Solar Alliance (ISA) (2015)Backed by the MEA and sustained multilateral cooperation.Positioned India as a global leader in renewable energy with 100+ member countries.
    BRICS Summits (Since 2009)Strengthened cooperation through the New Development Bank (NDB) and structured diplomatic dialogues.Enhanced India’s role in global economic governance and alternative financial structures.

    Way Forward

    1. Summit-to-Strategy Task Force – Create dedicated inter-ministerial teams to convert summit agreements into actionable roadmaps with clear deadlines.
    2. Diplomatic Corps 2.0 – Expand training and decision-making authority for diplomats to reduce dependency on political leadership and ensure continuity in foreign policy.
    3. Fast-Track Diplomacy Portal – Establish a digital platform within the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) for real-time tracking of agreements, approvals, and execution timelines.
    4. Global Thought Leadership Hub – Set up an international policy research hub to shape global narratives on UN reforms, climate action, and trade policies rather than just reacting to them.
    5. India Connect 2030 – Launch an ambitious global economic outreach program with mega-infrastructure projects, strategic trade pacts, and a counter-narrative to China’s Belt & Road Initiative (BRI).

    While India has made significant progress in institutionalizing diplomacy, further improvements are needed in follow-up mechanisms, bureaucratic efficiency, and multilateral leadership. By enhancing institutional processes alongside summit diplomacy, India can ensure sustained global influence and strategic consistency beyond high-profile engagements.

    #BACK2BASICS: About Summit-Level Diplomacy

    Summit-level diplomacy refers to high-level meetings between heads of state or government, often conducted to address pressing global, regional, or bilateral issues. These summits serve as platforms for direct negotiation, policy coordination, and diplomatic engagement at the highest levels.

    Examples:

    • G20 Summit (Global economic coordination)
    • BRICS Summit (Emerging economies’ collaboration)
    • India-China Informal Summits (Bilateral strategic discussions)

    Five Critical Elements of Summit-Level Diplomacy

    1. High-Level Representation: Involves participation of presidents, prime ministers, or monarchs, ensuring authoritative decision-making.
      • Example: Modi-Biden Summit for Indo-US strategic ties.
    2. Agenda-Setting & Issue Prioritization: Focuses on key economic, security, environmental, or diplomatic concerns.
      • Example: COP Climate Summits prioritize global climate action.
    3. Negotiation & Consensus Building: Provides a space for direct, high-stakes negotiations that can lead to policy breakthroughs.
      • Example: Indo-Pakistan Agra Summit (2001) aimed at peace efforts despite eventual failure.
    4. Bilateral & Multilateral Engagements: Can be bilateral (between two nations) or multilateral (involving multiple countries or organizations).
      • Example: QUAD Summit (US, India, Japan, Australia) for Indo-Pacific security.
    5. Symbolism & Public Diplomacy: Signals diplomatic intent, boosts international image, and reassures domestic audiences.
      • Example: India’s participation in G7 Summits showcases its rising global influence.

    Summit diplomacy plays a crucial role in shaping international relations, resolving disputes, and forging strategic alliances.

    Difference Between Summit-Level Diplomacy and Pseudo Summit-Level Diplomacy

    FeatureSummit-Level DiplomacyPseudo Summit-Level Diplomacy
    DefinitionHigh-level meetings involving heads of state/government for direct diplomatic negotiations.Symbolic or staged meetings that lack substantive decision-making or long-term impact.
    Decision-Making AuthorityLeaders have real authority to negotiate and finalize agreements.Often pre-scripted with little room for genuine negotiation or policy shifts.
    Substance vs. SymbolismFocuses on concrete policy discussions, economic ties, or security cooperation.Primarily for media optics, diplomatic signaling, or domestic political gains.
    Impact on International RelationsLeads to binding agreements, treaties, or diplomatic breakthroughs.Rarely results in significant policy changes or legally binding commitments.
    Examples– India-US 2+2 Dialogue (Defense & foreign policy coordination)
    – Indo-Pak Lahore Summit (1999) (Peace-building effort)
    – G20 Summits (Global economic strategies)    		– Trump-Kim Jong-un Hanoi Summit (2019) (Failed negotiations, no agreements)
    – Indo-China Informal Summits (Wuhan, Mamallapuram) (No formal treaties, mostly optics)
    – SAARC Summits Post-2016 (Minimal progress due to regional tensions)

    While summit-level diplomacy results in substantive outcomes, pseudo summit-level diplomacy is often limited to symbolism, diplomatic signaling, or media spectacle, without tangible policy changes.

  • PM-POSHAN Scheme

    Why in the News?

    The material cost for the PM-POSHAN (Pradhan Mantri Poshan Shakti Nirman) Scheme has been increased by 9.5%, resulting in an additional cost of ₹954 crore to be incurred by the Centre in the 2025-26 financial year.

    About PM-POSHAN Scheme:

    • The PM-POSHAN Scheme, formerly known as the Mid-Day Meal Scheme, is a centrally sponsored initiative aimed at providing a hot, cooked meal to children studying in government and government-aided schools across India.
    • Launched under the Ministry of Education, it focuses on improving children’s nutritional status, school participation, retention, and attendance.
    • The scheme complements POSHAN Abhiyan and Mission POSHAN 2.0 to improve nutrition among children and mothers.

    Key Features:

    • Target Group: It serves 11.20 crore children in Balvatikas (pre-primary classes) and Classes 1-8 in 10.36 lakh schools. Special focus is placed on disadvantaged children from low-income backgrounds.
    • Nutritional Goals: The scheme provides balanced meals to meet children’s nutritional needs.
      1. Primary Students: 20g pulses, 50g vegetables, 5g oil.
      2. Upper Primary Students: 30g pulses, 75g vegetables, 7.5g oil.
    • Model: The Centre provides 100% funding for food grains through the Food Corporation of India (FCI), while States contribute to meal implementation.
    • Funding Pattern:
      • 60:40 between Centre and States/UTs with the legislature.
      • 90:10 for Northeastern and Himalayan States.
      • 100% central funding for UTs without legislature.
    • 26 lakh metric tonnes of food grains are provided annually, with transportation costs covered by the Centre.
    • It also has a component to promote the development of School Nutrition Gardens in schools
    • Social Audit of the scheme is made mandatory in all the districts.
    [UPSC 2014] Which of the following can be said to be essentially the parts of Inclusive Governance?

    1 Permitting the Non-Banking Financial Companies to do banking

    2 Establishing effective District Planning Committees in all the districts

    3 Increasing the government spending on public health

    4 Strengthening the Mid-Day Meal Scheme

    Select the correct answers using the codes given below:

    (a) 1 and 2 only (b) 3 and 4 only (c) 2, 3 and 4 only (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4

     

  • [pib] Indian researchers introduce ‘Toxicity Standard’ of PM2.5 Pollution

    Why in the News?

    A recent study conducted in Kolkata shows that the toxicity value of PM2.5 experiences a sudden jump when the pollution level reaches around 70 µg/m³.

    About PM2.5

    • PM2.5 refers to fine particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 micrometers or smaller.
    • It is a major air pollutant linked to respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. Long-term exposure increases the risk of lung cancer, heart disease, asthma, and other health issues.
    • Major sources include vehicle exhaust, industrial emissions, construction dust, biomass burning, and solid waste burning, contributing to both outdoor and indoor pollution.
    • WHO recommends that the annual average PM2.5 concentration should NOT exceed 5 µg/m³, and the 24-hour average should not exceed 15 µg/m³ for more than 3-4 days per year.

    PM2.5 on Govt. Focus: National Clean Air Program (NCAP)

    • Launched in 2019 by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC), the NCAP aims to reduce particulate matter by 40% by 2026 compared to 2017 levels.
    • It targets 131 non-attainment cities across India, focusing on improving air quality and addressing sources of pollution.

    About the Notified Toxicity Standard for PM2.5 

    • A new toxicity standard for PM2.5 in Kolkata sets the critical threshold at 70 µg/m³.
    • Below this level, toxicity remains stable, but it sharply increases once the concentration exceeds 70 µg/m³.
    • It emphasizes reducing pollution sources, particularly biomass and solid waste burning, which contribute significantly to high PM2.5 levels and increased toxicity in Kolkata.
    • Policy Recommendation: To reduce health risks, air quality control measures should aim to keep PM2.5 levels below 70 µg/m³.
    [UPSC 2022] In the context of WHO Air Quality Guidelines, consider the following statements:

    1. The 24-hour mean of PM2.5 should not exceed 15 µg/m3 and annual mean of PM2.5 should not exceed 5 µg/m3.

    2. In a year, the highest levels of ozone pollution occur during the periods of inclement weather.

    3. PM10 can penetrate the lung barrier and enter the bloodstream.

    4. Excessive ozone in the air can trigger asthma.

    Which of the statements given above are correct?

    (a) 1, 3 and 4  (b) 1 and 4 only (c) 2, 3 and 4 (d) 1 and 2 only

     

  • [UPSC Webinar] By Shubham Sir | From Aspirant to Achiever: The MAC Formula for UPSC 2026 | Join on Sunday, 13th April At 7 PM

    [UPSC Webinar] By Shubham Sir | From Aspirant to Achiever: The MAC Formula for UPSC 2026 | Join on Sunday, 13th April At 7 PM

    Register Now!

    Register for the session to get complete UPSC 2026 preparation plan and strategy

    Register Now!
    UPSC

    Read about Shubham Sir’s UPSC 2026 Prep Webinar

    Preparing for UPSC 2026 can feel overwhelming, especially when you’re just starting out. Many aspirants begin with a lot of motivation after reading NCERTs, but soon realise how vast and complex the exam actually is. That’s when doubts start creeping in and consistency takes a hit. To help you through this phase, Shubham Sir is bringing a simple and effective framework—the MAC Formula: Mindset, Approach, and Consistency.

    Mindset is about staying calm, believing in yourself, and staying focused over the long run. Approach means planning smartly—knowing the syllabus, using PYQs the right way, and not getting lost in too many resources. And consistency? That’s about building habits, sticking to weekly goals, and showing up every single day. When all three come together, you’re on solid ground.

    Shubham Sir will also talk about AIR 2 Animesh’s journey—how he went from a complete beginner to a top-ranker by consistently writing weekly answers for 1.5 years. He’ll also help you map out a 14-month plan starting this April, covering answer writing, revision, and avoiding common traps.

    So if you’re aiming for UPSC 2026 and want to start strong, join the live session on Sunday, 13th April at 7 PM. It’s your chance to bring clarity to your prep and build the right momentum early on.

    This session will help you cut through the noise and start with a crystal-clear roadmap. You’ll learn to prioritize your study, recognize question trends, and, most importantly, focus on what UPSC truly values.

    A Rare Opportunity— Register Now!
    This isn’t just another generic UPSC strategy session. This power-packed masterclass is designed to give you a clear advantage over other aspirants.

    By the end of this session, you will have a list of must-study PYQs, a breakdown of microthemes, and a step-by-step strategy to approach UPSC preparation like a topper. If you’re serious about UPSC 2026 – Register now!

    Register Now!

    Shubham Sir, has identified key blind spots in UPSC preparation. He will conduct a free Zoom masterclass on, 13th April at 7 PM.

    Don’t miss out! Join him on, 13th April, at 7 PM!

    See you in masterclass”

    Register Now!

    It will be a 45 minute webinar, post which we will open up the floor for all kinds of queries which a beginner must have. No questions are taboo and Arvind Sir is known to be patiently solving all your doubts.

    Join us for a Zoom session on 13th April 2025 at 7:00 p.m. This session is a must-attend for you If you are attempting UPSC for the first time or have attempted earlier and now preparing for next year, then it is going to be a valuable session for you too.

    See you in the session”

    Register for the session for a focussed UPSC 2026 Prep

    Register Now!

    In this Civilsdaily masterclass, you will get:

    1. A 45-minute deep dive on how to plan your UPSC strategy from the start to the end.
    2. How do first-attempt IAS Rankers get the most out of their one year prep?
    3. Insider tips that only the top IAS and IPS rankers know and apply to get rank.

    By the end, you’ll have razor-sharp clarity and a clear path to crack UPSC with confidence and near-perfect certainty. 

    Join UPSC session on 13th April 2025, 7:00 pm

    Register Now!

    (Don’t wait—the next webinar won’t be until May 25)

    These masterclasses are packed with value. They are conducted in private with a closed community. We rarely open these webinars for everyone for free. This time we are keeping it for 300 seats only.

    Ready to attend the UPSC Webinar?

    Register Now!

    Not sure yet?

    We recommend you register here. It takes less than 10 seconds to register.

    • No spam! Once in a while, we’ll only send you high-quality exam-related content. 
    • We will inform you about the upcoming Masterclasses that might benefit you.
    • You can demand one free mentorship call from verified Civilsdaily mentors. 
    • You can always choose to unsubscribe. 

  • [11th April 2025] The Hindu Op-ed: Are existing mechanisms effective in combating judicial corruption?

    PYQ Relevance:

    [UPSC 2017] Critically examine the Supreme Court’s judgement on ‘The National Judicial Appointments Commission Act, 2014’ concerning the appointment of judges of higher judiciary in India.

    Linkage: The integrity of the appointment process is a key mechanism to prevent the entry of potentially corrupt individuals into the judiciary. Debates around judicial appointments often touch upon the need for transparency and meritocracy to safeguard against various forms of impropriety, including corruption.

     

    Mentor’s Comment:  The current system to deal with corruption in the judiciary includes in-house inquiries, impeachment, and oversight by the Supreme Court and High Courts. However, it is often slow, and secretive, and rarely results in strict action. Lack of transparency and political influence can weaken its impact, making it less effective in ensuring full accountability of judges.

    Today’s editorial talks about problems in making judges more accountable. It highlights gaps in how judicial misconduct is handled and why better checks are needed. This topic is useful for UPSC GS Paper 2 (governance, transparency) and GS Paper 4 (ethics, integrity in public life).

    _

    Let’s learn!

    Why in the News?

    Last month, a large amount of unaccounted cash was reportedly found at the official home of former Delhi High Court judge Justice Yashwant Varma. In response, Chief Justice of India, Sanjiv Khanna, started an internal inquiry into the matter.

    What are the limitations of the impeachment process in ensuring judicial accountability?

    • High Threshold for Removal: The impeachment process requires a two-thirds majority in both Houses of Parliament and an absolute majority of total membership. This makes it extremely difficult to impeach a judge even in cases of credible misconduct. Eg: No judge of the Supreme Court or High Court has ever been successfully impeached in independent India, despite allegations — such as in the case of Justice V. Ramaswami (1993), whose impeachment failed due to political abstentions.
    • Over-Reliance on Political Consensus: The process is politically driven, requiring broad support across parties, which may not be feasible in a fragmented or polarized Parliament. Political considerations often override judicial integrity in decision-making.
    • Delayed and Ineffective as a Deterrent: The process is slow, opaque, and reactive, initiated only after significant public outcry or media coverage. It fails to act as a timely or effective deterrent, allowing misconduct to go unchecked. Eg: Justice Nirmal Yadav of the Punjab and Haryana High Court was acquitted nearly 15 years after a corruption inquiry, despite early evidence.

    Why is there a demand to institutionalise transparency in judicial inquiries?

    • Prevents Perception of Shielding Judges: Transparency helps counter the belief that the judiciary protects its own members in misconduct cases. Eg: In the Justice Yashwant Varma case, the Supreme Court proactively released CCTV footage showing recovery of unaccounted cash to pre-empt accusations of cover-up.
    • Builds Public Trust and Confidence: In an era of social and mass media scrutiny, opaque proceedings can fuel public suspicion and damage the judiciary’s credibility. Making inquiry reports public can reaffirm accountability and institutional integrity.
    • Reduces Speculation and Misinformation: Lack of official communication can lead to rumours or leaks, which may distort facts and undermine due process. Eg: Experts have suggested appointing dedicated communications personnel in the judiciary to clarify facts and handle sensitive disclosures responsibly.

    Who informally influences judicial appointments, and how does it impact the collegium?

    • Executive’s Role in Informal Consultations: Even before formal recommendations, the executive is consulted informally, allowing it to influence selections. Eg: The Union Government often shares IB (Intelligence Bureau) inputs that can sway or stall decisions by the collegium.
    • De Facto Executive Veto: The government can withhold or delay approval of names without giving reasons, effectively creating a veto power. Eg: Several appointments have been indefinitely delayed by the executive sitting on the collegium’s recommendations.
    • Impact on Transparency and Candidate Morale: This opaque and selective process discourages deserving candidates from participating in judicial selection. Eg: Many lawyers and judges avoid the process due to its lack of transparency and potential for humiliation.

    How can peer review within the judiciary be strengthened to prevent judicial misconduct?

    • Institutionalising Informal FeedbackRegularise the informal feedback already exchanged within legal circles into a formal review system. Eg: Concerns shared among judges and lawyers about a colleague’s integrity can be compiled and assessed systematically.
    • Involving Bar Associations: Inputs from bar associations can serve as early warnings of problematic judicial behaviour. Eg: If advocates repeatedly report bias or misconduct by a judge, it could trigger a formal internal review.
    • Mandatory Periodic Evaluations: Judges could undergo peer-reviewed performance evaluations at regular intervals. Eg: Evaluation of case disposal rates, conduct in court, and legal soundness of judgments by a panel of peers.
    • Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest: Enforce mandatory disclosures of family members practicing in the same court or other potential conflicts. Eg: If a judge’s relative practices in the same court, either the judge is transferred or the relative is barred from appearing.
    • Protection of Whistleblowers Within Judiciary: Create a safe mechanism for judges or staff to report unethical conduct without fear of retaliation. Eg: A junior judge or clerk reporting bribe attempts or unusual case assignments should be protected and heard confidentially.

    When can contempt laws allow public scrutiny without undermining judicial dignity?

    • When Criticism is in Good Faith and Based on Facts: Legitimate concerns or constructive criticism aimed at reform, not defamation, should be allowed. Eg: A lawyer or journalist pointing out procedural delays or lack of transparency in judicial appointments based on verified data.
    • When the Speech is Not Intended to Scandalise the Court: Public discourse that respects the institution but critiques specific actions or decisions helps improve accountability. Eg: Civil society groups questioning a controversial verdict or delay in inquiry, without using derogatory language.
    • When It Promotes Institutional Integrity: Scrutiny that leads to reform and helps maintain the credibility of the judiciary should not be penalised. Eg: Media coverage exposing corruption in the judiciary, like the Justice Yashwant Varma case, can lead to necessary reforms if done responsibly.

    Way forward:

    • Establish an Independent Judicial Oversight Body: A permanent and independent authority comprising retired judges, legal scholars, and public representatives can investigate complaints, oversee peer reviews, and recommend disciplinary action.
    • Codify Transparent Guidelines and Communication Protocols: Formulate clear, time-bound procedures for judicial appointments, disclosures, and inquiry mechanisms with mandatory public reporting (where appropriate). Eg: Publish annual integrity audits, conflict-of-interest registers, and inquiry outcomes (with due protection for sensitive data) to uphold public trust.

  • When Parliament stayed awake through the night

    Why in the News?

    The recently held Budget session of Parliament became historic, as both the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha continued working all night and ended only around sunrise.

    What made the recently concluded Budget session of Parliament historically significant?

    • All-night Sitting: Both Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha continued debates through the night until early morning, which is extremely rare. For example, the Rajya Sabha was still debating at 8:30 p.m., with 22 speakers left, and the Waqf Bill was passed only around 2:30 a.m.
    • Record High Productivity: The session saw exceptionally high legislative productivity — 118% in Lok Sabha and 119% in Rajya Sabha. Eg: This indicates that the Houses worked more hours than scheduled, completing more business than expected.
    • Rich Parliamentary Debate and Public Engagement: Despite the late hours, MPs spoke passionately, aiming for impactful speeches that could go viral or make headlines. Eg: A woman MP quoted Victor Hugo (mistakenly calling him British), showing both the depth and drama of the debate.

    Who played a critical role in capturing the nuances of the all-night parliamentary session for the public?

    • Parliamentary Reporters: They stayed overnight in the House, observing debates and documenting proceedings for the media. Eg: The author of the editorial, a parliamentary reporter, described the urgency and drama of speeches during the night.
    • News Desks and Editors: They coordinated under pressure to ensure reports met tight print deadlines while maintaining accuracy. Eg: The reporter received frantic messages from the desk urging for a timely copy to meet the morning paper’s schedule.
    • Media as a Democratic Bridge: Reporters help the public understand what’s happening inside Parliament, especially during rare sittings. Eg: Despite physical restrictions in the new Parliament building, reporters continue to attend sessions to provide detailed coverage.

    Where are reporters restricted from going within the new Indian Parliament building, despite having official access?

    • Glass Enclosure for Media Personnel: Reporters, especially from electronic media, are confined to a glass enclosure within the Parliament premises. This limits their ability to move freely and interact with Members of Parliament (MPs). Eg: On July 29, 2024, journalists were restricted to this enclosure and prevented from accessing areas like the ‘Makar Dwar’, where they traditionally gathered sound bites from MPs.
    • Restricted Access to ‘Makar Dwar’: The ‘Makar Dwar’, a main entrance used by MPs, has been cordoned off, preventing journalists from approaching MPs for interviews. Eg: Journalists were removed from this area, which was previously a common spot for media interactions with MPs.
    • Limited Entry to Press Galleries: Access to the press galleries has been significantly reduced, with only a limited number of journalists allowed entry, often through a non-transparent selection process. Eg: The Editors’ Guild of India noted that only a fraction of the approximately 1,000 accredited journalists are granted access, without a clear procedure.
    • Separate Entry Points and Increased Security Checks: Journalists now have designated entry points separate from MPs and officials, coupled with multiple security checks, making access more cumbersome. Eg: Reporters are frisked multiple times and must navigate a windowless corridor with security cameras to reach the press gallery.
    • Restrictions Around Key Offices: Areas surrounding the Prime Minister’s Office, the Speaker’s office, and the Rajya Sabha Chairman’s office are off-limits to journalists, limiting their coverage scope. Eg: These zones have been cordoned off, preventing media personnel from accessing them.

    Why do reporters persist in covering parliamentary debates despite challenges?

    • Democratic Responsibility: Reporters feel a duty to keep the public informed about how their representatives function, especially during important debates. Eg: Even during the late-night Budget session, reporters stayed to capture each speaker’s arguments, helping citizens understand crucial legislative developments.
    • Fear of Missing Crucial Details: Journalists worry they might miss significant moments or policy announcements if they leave early or tune out. Eg: During a midnight speech on the Waqf Bill, a Member of Parliament misattributed Victor Hugo as British — a detail that adds color and context to the reporting.
    • Drama and Insight: Parliamentary sessions offer intense debates, humor, emotional appeals, and unfiltered views — making them compelling for storytelling. Eg: The sight of an actor-turned-politician struggling through an angry speech added drama and human interest to the reporter’s coverage.

    Way forward: 

    • Ensure Transparent and Inclusive Media Access: Parliament should adopt a fair, transparent system for press gallery access and allow broader journalist participation, ensuring diverse media voices are represented. Eg: Revoking arbitrary restrictions and restoring access to areas like ‘Makar Dwar’ can enhance real-time, on-ground reporting.
    • Leverage Technology for Better Public Engagement: Install live-streaming infrastructure, media briefing zones, and provide official transcripts quickly to support timely, accurate reporting. Eg: Designated digital zones can help journalists report swiftly without compromising security or disrupting proceedings.

    Mains PYQ:

    [UPSC 2019]  Individual Parliamentarian’s role as the national law maker is on a decline, which in turn, has adversely impacted the quality of debates and their outcome. Discuss.

    Linkage: Role of Parliamentary discussion and debate for the public. This also examines the role and effectiveness of individual Members of Parliament during parliamentary sessions. 

More posts