💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Subject: Banking Regulations

  • Relief to digital fraud victims: How losses upto 50K can be recovered

    Why in the News?

    The RBI notified a revised compensation framework for victims of digital payment fraud, effective 1 January 2027. Under the scheme, victims can recover part of losses up to ₹50,000 through a state-supported fund. The move follows a sharp rise in fraud value despite fewer reported cases.

    Why did the RBI intervene now, and what does the scale of digital fraud reveal about the existing liability framework?

    1. Rising fraud value: Fraud cases fell to 10,114 in FY26, but the amount involved increased 46% to ₹48,021 crore, indicating fewer but larger frauds.
    2. Consumer liability gap: The earlier framework placed the burden of proof and recovery on customers. Banks faced limited liability unless negligence was established
    3. Electronic Banking Transactions (EBTs) as the primary vector: EBT are a digitally initiated banking transaction, including NEFT, RTGS, UPI, and card-based payments. They became the primary fraud channel, exposing a liability gap.
    4. State absorption of residual risk: The new framework makes the RBI the majority loss-bearer for unrecovered fraud amounts. This signals that the regulator treats digital fraud loss as a systemic risk requiring regulatory underwriting, not merely a bilateral consumer-bank dispute.

    What is the consumer entitlement under the new framework, and what conditions govern eligibility?

    1. Maximum compensation ceiling: A victim is eligible for compensation of up to 85% of net loss amount or ₹25,000, whichever is less. This applies to gross fraudulent EBT losses up to ₹50,000.
    2. Lifetime cap: The compensation is available once during the lifetime of the account holder. Repeat claims for subsequent fraud events are not covered under this mechanism.
    3. Complaint filing window: Victims must lodge a complaint regarding the fraud within five calendar days of the event. Claims filed beyond this window are ineligible regardless of the loss amount.
    4. Loss verification standard: The loss must be established in accordance with the internal processes set out in the victim’s bank’s policy. The framework does not prescribe a uniform evidentiary standard across banks, leaving verification to individual bank procedures.
    5. Threshold-based compensation rate: For losses below ₹29,412, the victim receives 85% of the amount lost. For losses between ₹29,412 and ₹50,000, the victim receives a flat ₹25,000 (the ceiling).

    How is the cost of compensation shared between the RBI, the victim’s bank, and the beneficiary bank?

    1. Domestic fraud (below ₹29,412): RBI bears 65% of compensation. The victim’s bank and beneficiary bank contribute 10% each.
    2. Domestic EBT fraud between ₹29,412 and ₹50,000 (₹25,000 flat compensation): The RBI contributes ₹19,118 (76.5%). The victim’s bank and the beneficiary bank each contribute ₹2,941 (approximately 12% each).
    3. Cross-border EBT fraud (elevated bank contribution): In cross-border cases, the victim’s bank’s contribution rises to 20% for frauds below ₹29,412, and to ₹5,882 for frauds in the ₹29,412-₹50,000 band.
    4. Multiple beneficiary banks (proportionate allocation): Where more than one beneficiary bank receives the fraudulent amount, each bank’s share of the compensation is proportionate to the amount credited to its accounts.
    5. Numerical illustration (official example): If fraud loss is ₹40,000 and ₹15,000 is recovered, the net compensable loss is ₹25,000. The victim receives 85% of ₹25,000 = ₹21,250. The RBI contributes ₹16,250; victim’s bank and beneficiary bank contribute ₹2,500 each. If nothing is recovered, the victim receives ₹25,000 (ceiling), distributed in the same proportion.

    What standard of bank negligence triggers full bank liability, and what are the banks’ procedural obligations?

    1. Full bank liability for own negligence: Where fraud arises from the bank’s own negligence, the bank must compensate the victim entirely. The RBI cost-sharing mechanism does not apply in such cases.
    2. Safety and security failures: Failing to ensure proper safety and security mechanisms for EBTs constitutes negligence. This includes system malfunctions and security breaches.
    3. Alert failures: Failing to send mandatory transaction alerts for EBTs above ₹500 is classified as negligence. The alert obligation is non-discretionary.
    4. Complaint handling failures: Failing to provide 24×7 channels for customer complaints and failing to act diligently on received complaints both constitute negligence. Banks cannot limit complaint access to business hours.
    5. Complaint resolution timelines: Banks must resolve fraudulent EBT complaints within 45 calendar days for domestic EBTs and within 60 calendar days for cross-border EBTs. Breach of these timelines has implications for bank liability assessment.
    6. Post-complaint containment obligation: On receipt of any fraudulent EBT complaint, a bank must take prompt steps to prevent further unauthorised EBTs in the customer’s account. This is a proactive duty, not a passive acknowledgment obligation.

    Does the framework resolve the consumer’s structural vulnerability to digital fraud, or does it shift the problem without eliminating it?

    1. Consumer protection: The framework guarantees time-bound compensation and imposes liability for proven bank negligence.
    2. Limited bank incentives: RBI bears most compensation costs. Banks usually contribute only 10-20%, reducing incentives to strengthen fraud prevention.
    3. Procedural burden: Victims must report fraud within five days and satisfy bank-specific verification standards.
    4. Source of fraud: The framework compensates losses but does not strengthen EBT security standards or regulate payment intermediaries.
    5. Residual reporting: Victims must also report fraud to the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal or Cyber Crime Helpline. This supports record-keeping, not recovery.
    6. Coverage mismatch: The compensation cap is ₹25,000, whereas average fraud value in FY26 was about ₹4.75 crore per case, limiting relevance to small-value consumer fraud.

    Conclusion

    The RBI framework introduces the first regulatory mechanism for sharing consumer losses from digital fraud. It reduces immediate customer losses but leaves banks with limited financial incentives to prevent fraud. Large-value frauds, security standards and accountability of payment intermediaries remain unresolved.

  • Consider the following pairs

    Consider the following pairs :
    1. ABN Amro Bank :USA
    2. Barclays Bank :UK
    3. Kookmin Bank :Japan
    Which of the above pairs is/are correctly matched ?

  • Consider the following statements

    Consider the following statements:
    Statement-I: Syndicated lending spreads the risk of borrower default across multiple lenders.
    Statement-II: The syndicated loan can be a fixed amount/lump sum of funds, but cannot be a credit line.
    Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

  • Why higher interest rates may be need to bring in NRI deposits

    Why in the News?

    The RBI has allowed banks to raise fresh 3-5 year Foreign Currency Non-Resident (Bank) [FCNR(B)] deposits from NRIs and deposit the money with the RBI under a special scheme until September 2026. The RBI will bear the cost of protecting banks from exchange rate fluctuations (hedging cost), making it cheaper and more profitable for banks to attract foreign currency deposits. The objective is to encourage more NRI dollars to flow into India and strengthen foreign exchange inflows.

    What are FCNR(B) deposits?

    1. They are fixed-term foreign currency deposits offered by Indian banks to Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) and Overseas Citizens of India (OCIs). 
    2. They allow depositors to maintain savings in designated foreign currencies without converting funds into Indian rupees. 
    3. The RBI’s latest swap facility seeks to strengthen the attractiveness of these deposits and support India’s external financing requirements.

    What is the US Dollar-Rupee Forex Swap Facility for FCNR(B) Deposits?

    The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) introduced a special US Dollar-Rupee Forex Swap Facility to help banks mobilize fresh Foreign Currency Non-Resident, or FCNR(B) deposits. By bearing the hedging costs, the RBI enables banks to offer higher interest rates to NRIs without the currency risk. 

    Key details of the scheme include:

    1. Eligible Depositors: Available to Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) and Overseas Citizens of India (OCIs).
    2. Deposit Tenure: 3 to 5 years. 
    3. Deposit Currency: Mobilized in any freely convertible currency, but the swap must be done in US Dollars.
      1. Foreign Currency Denomination: Maintains deposits in: US Dollar (USD), Pound Sterling (GBP), Euro (EUR), Japanese Yen (JPY), Australian Dollar (AUD), and Canadian Dollar (CAD)
    4. Swap Rate: Undertaken “at par” (the RBI will buy USD at the FBIL Reference Rate and later sell it back at the same rate). 
    5. Timeline: Valid for deposits mobilized between June 8, 2026, and September 30, 2026. The swap window remains open to banks until October 16, 2026.
    6. Lock-in Period: Underlying deposits are subject to a 1-year lock-in period; however, the swaps undertaken with the RBI cannot be canceled. 
    7. Availability: Authorised Dealer Category-I banks can avail of this facility once a week.
    8. Exchange Rate Protection: Eliminates currency conversion risk associated with rupee deposits.
    9. Tax Benefit: Interest income remains exempt from Indian income tax while the depositor qualifies as a non-resident.
    10. Benchmark-Based Pricing: Interest rates are linked to internationally accepted benchmark rates.

    Why Has the RBI Reintroduced the FCNR(B) Swap Facility?

    1. External Sector Support: Facilitates mobilisation of stable foreign currency resources for the banking system.
    2. Concessional Swap Facility: Allows banks to swap FCNR(B) deposits with RBI at favourable rates.
    3. Hedging Cost Absorption: Transfers the foreign exchange hedging burden from banks to RBI.
    4. Capital Inflow Potential: Estimates suggest potential mobilisation of an additional $50-70 billion.
    5. Historical Policy Tool: Revives a mechanism previously used during periods of external vulnerability to strengthen foreign exchange inflows.

    Why Have FCNR(B) Deposit Inflows Declined Sharply?

    1. Collapse in Inflows: FY26 inflows declined by 86%, from $7.1 billion in FY25 to only $946 million.
    2. Global Interest Rate Differential: US and other developed market interest rates remain above 4%, offering attractive alternatives.
    3. Lower Domestic Offerings: FCNR(B) deposit rates remain significantly below comparable foreign currency investment products.
    4. Competition from Foreign Banks: NRI investors can earn higher returns without country-specific risks in advanced economies.
    5. Reduced Relative Attractiveness: Regulatory incentives alone may not offset yield differentials.
    6. Outstanding Stock Pressure: Total FCNR(B) deposits stood at $33.8 billion by March-end.

    Why Can Indian Banks Potentially Offer Higher FCNR(B) Rates Now?

    1. Hedging Cost Relief: RBI absorbs the cost of managing exchange rate risk.
    2. Margin Protection: Banks can increase deposit rates without significantly affecting profitability.
    3. Funding Diversification: Expands access to overseas funding sources.
    4. Improved Deposit Economics: Enhances viability of mobilising foreign currency deposits.
    5. Reduced Foreign Exchange Exposure: Minimises direct hedging obligations for banks.

    Why Are Banks Expected to Increase FCNR(B) Deposit Rates?

    1. Competitive Necessity: Requires matching global deposit opportunities available to NRIs.
    2. Yield-Based Decision Making: NRI investors are likely to compare returns across jurisdictions.
    3. US Market Competition: Higher yields available in US dollar-denominated products.
    4. Historical Evidence: FCNR(B) inflows have weakened significantly when global rate differentials widened.
    5. Deposit Mobilisation Objective: Higher rates remain essential for attracting meaningful inflows.

    What Are the Broader Macroeconomic Implications?

    1. Foreign Exchange Reserve Support: Strengthens reserve adequacy through stable foreign currency inflows.
    2. Balance of Payments Stability: Supports financing of current account requirements.
    3. Exchange Rate Management: Enhances RBI’s ability to manage rupee volatility.
    4. Banking Sector Liquidity: Expands long-term foreign currency funding.
    5. External Vulnerability Reduction: Reduces dependence on volatile portfolio flows.

    Conclusion

    The RBI’s decision to revive the FCNR(B) swap window reflects its proactive approach to strengthening India’s external sector amid a challenging global interest rate environment. While the facility reduces costs for banks and can potentially attract additional foreign currency inflows, its success will ultimately depend on whether banks offer sufficiently competitive returns to NRIs. Sustained mobilisation of FCNR(B) deposits can enhance foreign exchange reserves, support balance of payments stability, and reduce vulnerability to volatile capital flows, thereby reinforcing India’s macroeconomic resilience.

    Value Addition

    FCNR(B) Deposits vs NRE Deposits vs NRO Deposits

    FeatureFCNR(B)NRENRO
    Full FormForeign Currency Non-Resident (Bank) AccountNon-Resident External AccountNon-Resident Ordinary Account
    CurrencyForeign CurrencyIndian RupeeIndian Rupee
    Exchange Rate RiskNoYesYes
    RepatriabilityFully RepatriableFully RepatriableLimited Repatriability
    Tax on InterestTax ExemptTax ExemptTaxable
    Depositor EligibilityNRI/OCINRINRI

    Importance of NRI Deposits for India

    1. Stable Capital Source: Less volatile than Foreign Portfolio Investment (FPI) and other short-term capital flows.
    2. Foreign Exchange Augmentation: Supports accumulation of Foreign Exchange (Forex) Reserves.
    3. Banking Sector Funding: Provides long-term foreign currency liabilities to banks.
    4. External Financing: Supports financing of the Current Account Deficit (CAD) and other external sector requirements.
    5. Crisis Buffer: Acts as a source of foreign capital during periods of external stress and global financial uncertainty.

    RBI Instruments for Managing External Sector Stability

    1. FCNR(B) Swap Window: Mobilises foreign currency deposits from NRIs while reducing hedging costs for banks.
    2. Foreign Exchange (Forex) Market Intervention: Stabilises excessive exchange rate volatility in the rupee.
    3. Foreign Exchange Reserves: Provides a buffer against external shocks and capital outflows.
    4. Monetary Policy Operations: Influences liquidity conditions, interest rates, and capital flows.
    5. Macroprudential Measures: Manages systemic risks arising from volatile capital movements and financial market disruptions.

  • With reference to the institution of Banking Ombudsman in India, which one of the statement is not correct

    With reference to the institution of Banking Ombudsman in India, which one of the statement is not correct?

  • Microfinance is the provision of financial services to people of low-income groups. This includes both the consumers and the self-employed. The service/services rendered under microfinance is/are: 1. Credit facilities 2. Savings facilities 3. Insurance facilities 4. Fund Transfer facilities

    Microfinance is the provision of financial services to people of low-income groups. This includes both the consumers and the self-employed. The service/services rendered under microfinance is/are: 1. Credit facilities 2. Savings facilities 3. Insurance facilities 4. Fund Transfer facilities

  • Why is the offering of “teaser loans” by commercial banks a cause of economic concern

    Why is the offering of “teaser loans” by commercial banks a cause of economic concern?
    1. The teaser loans are considered to be an aspect of subprime lending and banks may be exposed to the risk of defaulters in future.
    2. In India, the teaser loans are mostly given to inexperienced entrepreneurs to set up manufacturing or export units.

  • Consider the liquid assets

    Consider the liquid assets :
    1). Demand deposits with the banks
    2). Time deposits with the banks
    3). Saving deposits with the banks
    4). Currency
    The correct sequence of these assets in the decreasing order of liquidity is

  • Basel III Accord’ or simply ‘Basel III’ often seen in the news, seeks to

    Basel III Accord’ or simply ‘Basel III’ often seen in the news, seeks to

  • The term ‘Core Banking Solution’ is sometimes seen in the news. Which of the following statements best describes/describe this term

    The term ‘Core Banking Solution’ is sometimes seen in the news. Which of the following statements best describes/describe this term?
    1. It is a networking of a bank’s branches which enables customers to operate their accounts from any branch of the bank on its network regardless of where they open their accounts.
    2. It is an effort to increase RBI’s control over commercial banks through computerization.
    3. It is a detailed procedure by which a bank with huge non-performing assets is taken over by another bank.
    Select the correct answer using the code given below.