💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Subject: Economics

  • Draft E-Commerce Policy

    The Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT) will soon come out with a common acceptable draft e-commerce policy.

    Earlier policy

    • The previous draft in July last year had proposed a regulator, an e-commerce law, periodic audit of companies that store or mirror Indian users’ data overseas.
    • The latest draft calls for streamlining of regulatory processes to ease the burden of compliance for activities related to e-commerce and regulations for data that will provide for sharing mechanism.

    What are the provisions of the new law?

    Data Usage

    • According to a revised draft, the government would lay down principles for the usage of data for industrial development, where such norms do not already exist.
    • They aim to put in place safeguards to prevent misuse and access of data by unauthorized persons.
    • Such safeguards may include regulating the cross-border flow of data pertaining to Indians and transactions taking place in India and the requirement of adequacy audits to be carried out by Indian firms.
    • As per the recent draft policy, violation of safeguards shall be viewed seriously and attract heavy penalties.

    Regulation, exports

    • Conformity assessment procedures will be put in place to verify that goods and services sold on e-commerce platforms meet required standards and technical regulations.
    • The government shall collect information from e-commerce platforms to aid it in making necessary decisions.
    • In order to ensure that e-commerce is not used to defraud customers, registration with an authority identified by the Government shall be mandatory.
    • The policy shall bring e-commerce exports on par with non-e-commerce exports by enabling online grant of drawbacks, advance authorization and GST refund.

    Consumer protection

    • As per the draft, e-commerce operators must ensure to bring out clear and transparent policies on discounts, including the basis of discount rates funded by platforms.
    • Such a move aims to ensure fair and equal treatment.
    • It said consumers have a right to be made aware of all relevant details about the goods and services offered for sale including country of origin, value addition in India etc.
    • In case the seller fails to establish the genuineness of his products within a reasonable time frame, the e-commerce platform shall delist the seller.

  • What is Index of Industrial Production (IIP)?

    Last week saw the release of the Index of Industrial Production (IIP), which recorded a contraction of 1.6% in January.

    Index of Industrial Production (IIP)

    • Index of Industrial Production data or IIP as it is commonly called is an index that tracks manufacturing activity in different sectors of an economy.
    • The IIP number measures the industrial production for the period under review, usually a month, as against the reference period.
    • IIP is a key economic indicator of the manufacturing sector of the economy.
    • There is a lag of six weeks in the publication of the IIP index data after the reference month ends.
    • IIP index is currently calculated using 2011-2012 as the base year.

    IIP Index Components:

    • Mining, manufacturing, and electricity are the three broad sectors in which IIP constituents fall.
    • The relative weights of these three sectors are 77.6% (manufacturing), 14.4% (mining) and 8% (electricity).
    • Electricity, crude oil, coal, cement, steel, refinery products, natural gas, and fertilizers are the eight core industries that comprise about 40 per cent of the weight of items included in the IIP.

    Basket of products

    There are 6 sub-categories:

    1. Primary Goods (consisting of mining, electricity, fuels and fertilisers)
    2. Capital Goods (e.g. machinery items)
    3. Intermediate Goods (e.g. yarns, chemicals, semi-finished steel items, etc)
    4. Infrastructure Goods (e.g. paints, cement, cables, bricks and tiles, rail materials, etc)
    5. Consumer Durables (e.g. garments, telephones, passenger vehicles, etc)
    6. Consumer Non-durables (e.g. food items, medicines, toiletries, etc)

    Who releases IIP data?

    • The IIP data is compiled and published by CSO every month.
    • CSO or Central Statistical Organisation operates under the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MoSPI).
    • The IIP index data, once released, is also available on the PIB website.

    Try this PYQ:

    Q. In the ‘Index of Eight Core Industries’, which one of the following is given the highest weight?

    (a) Coal production

    (b) Electricity generation

    (c) Fertilizer production

    (d) Steel production

    Who uses IIP data?

    • The factory production data (IIP) is used by various government agencies such as the Ministry of Finance, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), private firms and analysts, among others for analytical purposes.
    • The data is also used to compile the Gross Value Added (GVA) of the manufacturing sector in the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) on a quarterly basis.

    IIP base year change:

    • The base year was changed to 2011-12 from 2004-05 in the year 2017.
    • The earlier base years were 1937, 1946, 1951, 1956, 1960, 1970, 1980-81, 1993-94 and 2004-05.

    IIP vs ASI

    • While the IIP is a monthly indicator, the Annual Survey of Industries (ASI) is the prime source of long-term industrial statistics.
    • The ASI is used to track the health of industrial activity in the economy over a longer period. The index is compiled out of a much larger sample of industries compared to IIP.
    • The IIP essentially tracks the change in the volume of production in Indian industries.

  • What are AT1 Bonds?

    The decision of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) to slap restrictions on mutual fund (MF) investments in additional tier-1 (AT1) bonds has raised a storm in the MF and banking sectors.

    What are AT1 Bonds?

    • AT1 Bonds stand for additional tier-1 bonds. These are unsecured bonds that have perpetual tenure. In other words, the bonds have no maturity date.
    • They have a call option, which can be used by the banks to buy these bonds back from investors.
    • These bonds are typically used by banks to bolster their core or tier-1 capital.
    • AT1 bonds are subordinate to all other debt and only senior to common equity.
    • Mutual funds (MFs) are among the largest investors in perpetual debt instruments and hold over Rs 35,000 crore of the outstanding additional tier-I bond issuances of Rs 90,000 crore.

    What action has been taken by the Sebi recently and why?

    • In a recent circular, the Sebi told mutual funds to value these perpetual bonds as a 100-year instrument.
    • This essentially means MFs have to make the assumption that these bonds would be redeemed in 100 years.
    • The regulator also asked MFs to limit the ownership of the bonds to 10 per cent of the assets of a scheme.
    • According to the Sebi, these instruments could be riskier than other debt instruments.

    Try this PYQ:

    Consider the following statements:

    1. The Reserve Bank of India manages and services the Government of India Securities but not any State Government Securities.
    2. Treasury bills are issued by the Government of India and there are no treasury bills issued by the State Governments.
    3. Treasury bills offer are issued at a discount from the par value.

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    (a) 1 and 2 only

    (b) 3 Only

    (c) 2 and 3 only

    (d) 1, 2 and 3

    How MFs will be affected?

    • Typically, MFs have treated the date of the call option on AT1 bonds as the maturity date.
    • Now, if these bonds are treated as 100-year bonds, it raises the risk in these bonds as they become ultra long-term.
    • This could also lead to volatility in the prices of these bonds as the risk increases the yields on these bonds rises.
    • Bond yields and bond prices move in opposite directions and therefore, the higher yield will drive down the price of the bond, which in turn will lead to a decrease in the net asset value of MF schemes holding these bonds.
    • Moreover, these bonds are not liquid and it will be difficult for MFs to sell these to meet redemption pressure.

    What’s the impact on banks?

    • AT1 bonds have emerged as the capital instrument of choice for state banks as they strive to shore up capital ratios.
    • If there are restrictions on investments by mutual funds in such bonds, banks will find it tough to raise capital at a time when they need funds in the wake of the soaring bad assets.
    • A major chunk of AT1 bonds is bought by mutual funds.

    Why has the Finance Ministry asked Sebi to review the decision?

    • The FM has sought withdrawal of valuation norms for AT1 bonds as it might lead to mutual funds making losses and exiting from these bonds, affecting capital raising plans of PSU banks.
    • The government doesn’t want a disruption in the fund mobilization exercise of banks at a time when two PSU banks are on the privatization block.
    • Banks are yet to receive the proposed capital injection in FY21 although they will need more capital to face the asset-quality challenges in the foreseeable future.
    • Fitch’s own estimate pegs the sector’s capital requirement between $15 billion-58 billion under various stress scenarios for the next two years, of which state banks account for the bulk.

  • Need for national security shield in FDI

     

    Relaxation on Chinese FDI

    • Last April, India had subjected all Chinese FDI to mandatory government screening.
    • The aim was to curb opportunistic takeovers of Indian companies, a concern fuelled by sharp corrections in equity markets in March 2020.
    • Several economies including the US, Australia, Canada and Germany faced similar concerns.
    • They blocked specific takeover attempts, using special laws for national security screening of inward FDI.
    •  In the absence of similar legislation, India did not differentiate between investments which raised genuine national security concerns and those that did not.
    • This is a crucial shortcoming.
    • With market indices now hovering at their peaks, reportedly India may allow Chinese FDI up to 25 per cent in equity under the automatic route.

    Regulation of FDI and issues with it

    • India regulates foreign investments primarily through FEMA.
    • FEMA clearly provides two specific macro-prudential objectives — facilitating external trade and payments; and promoting orderly development and maintenance of foreign exchange markets in India.
    • Accordingly, it empowers the central government and the RBI, acting in consultation with each other, to regulate capital account transactions.
    • These regulations determine who can invest through the FDI route, in which sector and how much.
    • In practice, however, FEMA regulations have often responded to concerns not strictly related to macro-prudential objectives.
    • One such concern has been national security.

    Need for the law to scrutinise FDI from national security angle

    • Shortcoming of FEMA underscores the need for India to emulates its western peers and enact a statute specifically designed for national security screening of strategic FDI.
    • Unlike FEMA, this new statute must explicitly lay down legal principles for determining when a foreign acquisition of an Indian company poses genuine national security threats.
    • In this regard, a policy paper published by the Peterson Institute for International Economics three types of legitimate threats from foreign acquisitions.

    3 Types of threat from foreign acquisitions

    1) Dependency on foreign supplier

    • The first threat arises if a foreign acquisition renders India dependent on a foreign-controlled supplier of goods or services crucial to the functioning of the Indian economy.
    • For this threat to be credible, it needs to be further established that the industry in which the acquisition is supposed to take place is tightly concentrated, the number of close substitutes limited, and the switching costs are high.

    2) Technology transfer

    • The second threat emanates from a proposed acquisition transferring a technology or an expertise to a foreign-controlled entity that might be deployed by that entity or a foreign government in a manner harmful to India’s national interests.
    • The credibility of this threat again depends on whether the market for such technology or expertise is tightly concentrated or if they are readily available elsewhere.

    3) Threat of infiltration, surveillance or sabotage

    • The third threat arises if a proposed acquisition allows insertion of some potential capability for infiltration, surveillance or sabotage via human or non-human agents into the provision of goods or services crucial to the functioning of Indian economy.
    • This threat is particularly credible when the target company supplies crucial goods or services to the Indian government, its military or even critical infrastructure units and the switching costs are high.

    Way forward

    • The above stated 3 types of threats could provide conceptual clarity in the new statute could make national security assessments objective, transparent and amenable to the rule of law.
    • On procedure, the statute must empower only the finance minister to reject certain strategic foreign acquisitions on national security grounds.
    • Both the power and accountability mechanisms should be hardcoded into the statute itself, as is the case in some mature parliamentary democracies.
    • For instance, the Australian Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Act, 1975 empowers the treasurer to block certain foreign acquisitions on national security grounds.
    • Similarly, the Investment Canada Act, 1985 empowers a minister to reject certain foreign acquisitions.

    Consider the question “India needs to recognise the national security threat emanating from strategic FDI. This requires identifying threats. In lights of this, examine the types of threats and suggest the ways to deal with it.” 

    Conclusion

    Overall, India’s tryst with Chinese FDI underscores the importance of identifying specific national security threats emanating from strategic FDI and addressing them objectively. This is too sensitive a matter to be left to capital controls under FEMA. A dedicated statute for national security screening of inward FDI would be best suited for handling such issues.

  • India as a factory for the Quad

    The article highlights how India could offer the solution to the tactical issue faced by the Quad: matching China’s manufacturing capacity.

    Strategic case for the Quad

    • The strategic case for the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue, better known as the Quad, has always been sound.
    • A rising China, with its authoritarian one-party system, is a challenge to the democratic order.
    • The strategic case for the Quad has, however, always faced a tactical hurdle.
    • China was the factory of the world.
    • It had become an almost indispensable cog in the global supply chain owing to its low-cost manufacturing prowess at a mass scale.
    • How could any grouping hope to challenge China’s power-play dynamics while at the same time being dependent on its factories to sustain its economies?

    Two recent development that changed the dynamic

    • Two recent developments have completely changed the dynamic.
    • First, Australia returned to the Malabar Naval exercises in 2020, after 13 years.
    • Second, on March 12, the first summit-level meet of the Quad — comprising the US, India, Japan and Australia — is scheduled to take place.

    Rise in India’s manufacturing ability

    • What has changed between 2007 and 2020 that Quad 2.0 has become viable is the globally visible rise in India’s manufacturing ability.
    • Consider the following examples.

    1) PPE Kit manufacturing

    • First, the success in PPE kits.
    • At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, India was manufacturing zero PPE kits.
    • India not just created an overnight world-class manufacturing capacity to meet its own needs but also started exporting PPE kits.

    2) Vaccine Maitri

    • Second, the soft power of Vaccine Maitri.
    • The developed countries are scrambling to secure vaccines for their domestic population.
    • India is not only vaccinating its own people faster than any other country but is also exporting millions of vaccines to countries in need.
    • From Canada to Pakistan and from the Caribbean Islands to Brazil — Made in India vaccines have been a life vest across the globe.

    3) India’s private industry

    • Third, the enterprise of India’s private industry — a hallmark of the deepening manufacturing base.
    • As a recent New York Times report noted, when it came to syringes — without which the vaccines were useless — the global scramble again led to Indian manufactures.
    • Hindustan Syringes alone has ramped up its manufacturing capacity to almost 6,000 syringes a minute.

    4) Precision high-end manufacturing

    • The PLI scheme launched for electronics’ manufacturing evinced unprecedented global interest with 22 top companies, including the top manufactures for Apple and Samsung mobile phones.
    • Over the next five years, a manufacturing capacity of over $150 billion and exports of $100 billion have been tied up through this scheme.

    5) Figher plane manufacturing

    • Fifth, the success of India’s fourth-generation fighter jet programme and the orders placed by the Indian Air Force for 83 Tejas jets.
    • India’s success is one more milestone in its journey towards emerging as a global manufacturing destination.

    Policy changes to make India manufacturing destination

    • Concurrently, India has been reforming its economic policies to make it even more attractive as a manufacturing destination.
    • India has the lowest tax rate anywhere in the world — 15 per cent for new manufacturing units.
    • FDI norms have been relaxed across the board and automatic approval processes instituted for FDI even up to 100 per cent.
    • Privatisation of PSUs is now an established process.
    • Labour laws have been finally reformed and compliance burdens significantly eased.
    • Taxation is now faceless, thus ending the spectre of rent-seeking.
    • A well-functioning, world-class bankruptcy law is in place. Interest rates are low.
    • And India’s digital infrastructure rivals the best in the world and in many cases beats it.

    Consider the question “India’s growing prowess as the manufacturing hub could provide the Quad tactical basis by replacing China. Comment.“

    Conclusion

    The only arrow that was missing in the quiver of the Quad has now been attained. The strategic case for the Quad was never in doubt. The dependence on China’s factories is what kept the grouping of democracies from emerging. India has raised its hand to solve that problem.

  • A case for a revamped, need-based PDS

    The article highlights the factors governing the food subsidy bill and suggests ways to reduce it.

    Growing food subsidy bill

    • The Economic Survey, tabled in Parliament in January, rightly flagged the issue of a growing food subsidy bill.
    • During 2016-17 to 2019-20, the subsidy amount, clubbed with loans taken by the Food Corporation of India (FCI) under the National Small Savings Fund (NSSF) towards food subsidy, was in the range of ₹1.65-lakh crore to ₹2.2-lakh crore.
    • In future, the annual subsidy bill of the Centre is expected to be about ₹2.5-lakh crore.
    • During the three years, the quantity of food grains drawn by States (annually) hovered around 60 million tonnes to 66 million tonnes.
    • The National Food Security Act (NFSA) 2013, covered two-thirds of the country’s population, this naturally pushed up the States’ drawal.
    • Based on an improved version of the targeted Public Distribution System (PDS), the law requires the authorities to provide to each beneficiary 5 kg of rice or wheat per month.

    How politics influenced the issue price

    • Economic Survey has hinted at an increase in the Central Issue Price (CIP).
    • Central Issue Price has remained at ₹2 per kg for wheat and ₹3 per kg for rice for years, though the NFSA, even in 2013, envisaged a price revision after three years.
    • What makes the subject more complex is the variation in the retail issue prices of rice and wheat, from nil in States such as Karnataka and West Bengal for Priority Households (PHH) and Antyodaya Anna Yojana (AAY) ration card holders.
    • In Tamil Nadu, rice is given free of cost for all categories; this includes non-PHH.
    • A mere increase in the CIPs of rice and wheat without a corresponding rise in the issue prices by the State governments would only increase the burden of States.
    • Political compulsions are perceived to be coming in the way of the Centre and the States increasing the prices.

    Relook at food subsidy system

    • An official committee in January 2015 called for decreasing the quantum of coverage under the law, from the present 67% to around 40%.
    • For all ration cardholders drawing food grains, a “give-up” option, as done in the case of cooking gas cylinders, can be made available.
    •  Even though States have been allowed to frame criteria for the identification of PHH cardholders, the Centre can nudge states into pruning the number of such beneficiaries.
    • As for the prices, the existing arrangement of flat rates should be replaced with a slab system.
    • Barring the needy, other beneficiaries can be made to pay a little more for a higher quantum of food grains.

    Consider the question “There is a pressing need for revamping the food subsidy system. In light of this, suggest the measures to improve the system.”

    Conclusion

    These measures, if properly implemented, can have a salutary effect on retail prices in the open market. A revamped, need-based PDS is required not just for cutting down the subsidy bill but also for reducing the scope for leakages. Political will should not be found wanting.

  • Farmers produce organisations (FPOs)

    The article analyses the role farmers produce organisations (FPOs) can play in improving the bargaining power of the small farmers and also suggest ways to improve FPOs.

    Declining size of farm holdings

    • The average farm size in India declined from 2.3 hectares (ha) in 1970-71 to 1.08 ha in 2015-16.
    • The share of small and marginal farmers increased from 70 per cent in 1980-81 to 86 per cent in 2015-16.
    • At the state level, the average size of farm holdings in 2015-16 ranged from 3.62 ha in Punjab, 2.73 in Rajasthan and 2.22 in Haryana to 0.75 in Tamil Nadu, 0.73 in Uttar Pradesh, 0.39 in Bihar and 0.18 in Kerala.

    Encouraging FPOs to help small farmers

    • Small farmers face several challenges in getting access to inputs and marketing facilities.
    • In the last decade, the Centre has encouraged farmer producer organisations (FPOs) to help farmers.
    • Since 2011, it has intensively promoted FPOs under the Small Farmers’ Agri-Business Consortium (SFAC), NABARD, state governments and NGOs.
    • The membership of an FPO ranges from 100 to over 1,000 farmers.
    • The ongoing support for FPOs is mainly in the following two forms:
    • 1) A grant of matching equity (cash infusion of up to Rs 10 lakh) to registered FPOs.
    • 2) A credit guarantee cover to lending institutions (maximum guarantee cover 85 per cent of loans not exceeding Rs 100 lakh).
    • The budget for 2018-19 announced supporting measures for FPOs including a five-year tax exemption.
    • The budget for 2019-20 talked of setting up 10,000 more FPOs in the next five years.
    • Some studies show that we need more than one lakh FPOs for a large country like India while we currently have less than 10,000.

    Looking at the performance of FPOs in last decade

    • Experience shows a mixed performance of FPOs in the last decade.
    • Some estimates show that 30 per cent of these are operating viably while 20 per cent are struggling to survive.
    • The remaining 50 per cent are still in the initial phase of mobilisation and business planning.
    • NABARD has undertaken a field study on the benefits of FPOs in Punjab and Madhya Pradesh.
    • The study shows that in nascent FPOs, the proportion of farmer members contributing to FPOs activities is 20-30 per cent while for the emerging and mature FPOs it is higher at about 40-50 per cent.
    • A study by International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) has undertaken a comparative study of FPOs in Maharashtra and Bihar.
    • In Maharashtra, some of the FPOs have organically evolved (OFPOs) when farmers have taken the lead to adopt market-oriented practices, develop cost-effective solutions in production and marketing.
    • In the case of Bihar, almost all FPOs have been promoted (PFPOs).

    Challenges

    • Studies of NABARD show that there are some important challenges for building sustainable FPOs.
    • Some of these are lack of technical skills, inadequate professional management, weak financials, inadequate access to credit, lack of risk mitigation mechanism and inadequate access to market and infrastructure.

    Focusing on 3 issues for the improvement of FPOs

    1) Getting credit

    • Issues such as working capital, marketing, infrastructure have to be addressed while scaling up FPOs.
    • Banks must have structured products for lending to FPOs.
    • These organisations lack professional management and, therefore, need capacity building.

    2) Linking with input companies

    • FPOs have to be linked with input companies, technical service providers, marketing/processing companies, retailers etc.
    • They need a lot of data on markets and prices and other information and competency in information technology.

    3) Augmenting the size of land

    • The FPOs can be used to augment the size of the land by focusing on grouping contiguous tracts of land as far as possible — they should not be a mere grouping of individuals.
    • Women farmers also can be encouraged to group cultivate for getting better returns.
    • FPOs can also encourage consolidation of holdings.

    Consider the question “How FPOs can play an important part in helping the small farmers by improving their bargaining power? What are the challenges faced by the FPOs?”

    Conclusion

    The FPOs have to be encouraged by policy makers and other stakeholders apart from scaling up throughout the country to benefit particularly the small holders.

  • Ramagundam Floating Solar Power Plant

    The country’s biggest floating solar power plant, by generation capacity at Ramagundam in Peddapalli district of Telangana is set to be commissioned by May-June.

    Try this PYQ:

    With reference to technologies for solar power production, consider the following statements :

    1. ‘Photovoltaics’ is a technology that generates electricity by direct conversion of light into electricity, while ‘Solar Thermal’ is a technology that utilizes the Sun’s rays to generate heat which is further used in electricity generation process.
    2. Photovoltaics generate Alternating Current (AC), while Solar Thermal generates Direct Current (DC).
    3. India has manufacturing base for Solar Thermal technology, but not for Photovoltaics.

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    (a) 1 only

    (b) 2 and 3 only

    (c) 1, 2 and 3

    (d) None

    Ramagundam Solar Plant

    • It would be one of the renewable (solar) energy plants being developed by NTPC with an installed capacity of 447MW in the Southern Region and the entire capacity would be commissioned by March 2023.
    • It will be spread over 450 acres of water surface area in the reservoir.
    • It will be the single location largest floating solar plant in the country as of now; 92 MW floating unit at Kayamkulam gas plant in Kerala and a 25 MW unit at Simhadri power plant.
    • In addition, we are setting up a 230 MW ground-mounted solar power plant in Ettayapuram near Tuticorin in Tamil Nadu

    Why floating solar?

    • One of the biggest advantages of floating solar panels is that the installations do not require valuable land space.
    • Many of these installations can take up unused space on bodies of water, such as hydroelectric dam reservoirs, wastewater treatment ponds, or drinking water reservoirs.
    • Additionally, installing solar panels out on open water reduces the need for tree removal and forest clearing, a practice used in the case of some larger solar panel installations.
    • The bodies of water that host floating solar arrays help cool down the solar equipment, which means the panels produce electricity at higher efficiencies in hot climates than they might otherwise.
    • The floating solar panel structure shades the body of water and reduces evaporation from these ponds, reservoirs, and lakes.
    • This is a particularly useful benefit in areas susceptible to drought, as water loss to evaporation can add up over time and contribute to a shortage.

  • Enabling the Business of Agriculture (EBA) 2019,

    Enabling the Business of Agriculture (EBA) 2019, published by the World Bank highlights the constraints faced by farmers. The article highlights the key findings of the publication.

    Constraints in carrying out farming activity

    • Debates around the farm laws have brought to light the issue of developing a sound regulatory framework to promote India’s agricultural growth.
    • The fact remains that farmers, mainly smallholders, across India continue to face various constraints.
    • They include constraints in accessing agricultural inputs, markets, finance, human resources, and information, which are critical for increasing farmers’ competitiveness.
    • A recent publication by the World Bank titled Enabling the Business of Agriculture (EBA) 2019 measures the extent to which government regulatory systems in 101 countries worldwide make it easier for their farmers to operate agricultural activities.
    • These indicators measure the strength of a country’s agricultural regulatory environment pertaining to market integration and entrepreneurship in agriculture.
    • Among 101 countries covered, India ranked 49 on the EBA aggregate score.

    Key takeaways from EBA for India

    • India lags behind its close competitors in world agriculture, namely China, Brazil, and Russia.
    • Compared to these three countries, India has the weakest performance on five out of eight indicators.
    • They are registering fertilizer and machinery, securing water, sustaining livestock, and protecting plant health indicators.
    • Registering fertilizer and machinery indicators measure domestic laws and regulations that provide farmers access to fertilizer and agricultural machinery.
    • The regulatory processes that help farmers make appropriate decisions regarding the level of investment in irrigation are measured by securing water indicator.
    • Sustaining livestock indicator captures the quality of regulations affecting farmers’ access to livestock farming inputs.
    • The quality of legislation on phytosanitary standards (SPS) is captured through the protecting plant health indicator.

    Need to develop a suitable regulatory system

    • Governments can play a critical role in this regard by enacting laws and regulations.
    • Such laws and regulations can influence farmers’ access to agricultural inputs, cost of production, agricultural markets and value chains, the competitiveness of farmers, and private investment in the farming sector.
    • The regulatory system that governs irrigation management is essential for reducing the variability of farm output, prices, and incomes, minimising vulnerability to natural shocks, and incentivising the production of riskier and high returns crops.
    • Gaining access to the global agricultural value chain requires a sound regulatory framework on SPS.

    India’s strong areas

    • The comparative score of India on supplying seed, trading food, and accessing finance indicators is high.
    • Supplying seed indicator evaluates laws and regulations that ensure timely release of seed to farmers.
    • The trading food indicator assesses laws and regulations that facilitate exporting of farm products by farmers.
    • The regulatory framework on the use of warehouse receipts is assessed using accessing finance indicator.
    • A robust warehouse receipts system enables the farmers to obtain the credit needed to invest in agriculture.

    Opportunity for India

    • The future of world agriculture and food production is expected to increasingly depend on middle-income countries such as China, India, Brazil, and Indonesia.
    • To make the best use of this great opportunity, India needs to put in place an agricultural regulatory system that would make it easier for its farmers to conduct agricultural activities.

    Consider the question “Farmers, mainly smallholders, across India continue to face various constraints in carrying out farming activities. What are the implications of such constraints? What role government can play in removing these constraints?”

    Conclusion

    The EBA project results reveal that, compared to its close competitors, the strength of India’s agricultural regulatory environment is weak on the whole and with respect to key performance indicators.

  • [pib] Glycemic Index in Rice

    The Union Minister of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare has provided some useful information about some indigenous varieties of rice.

    Try this PYQ from CSP 2018:

    Q.With reference to the Genetically Modified mustard (GM mustard) developed in India, consider the following statements:

    1. GM mustard has the genes of a soil bacterium that give the plant the property of pest-resistance to a wide variety of pests.
    2. GM mustard has the genes that allow the plant cross-pollination and hybridization.
    3. GM mustard has been developed jointly by the IARI and Punjab Agricultural University.

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    (a) 1 and 3 only

    (b) 2 only

    (c) 2 and 3 only

    (d) 1, 2 and 3

    Indigenous varieties of rice

    • Indigenous varieties of rice are being promoted through varieties of programmes.
    • 574 indigenous varieties of rice have been propagated and tested at more than 10,000 farmers’ fields.
    • Nutritional profiling of 300 selected rice varieties has been done for market linkage and better price to the farmers.
    • Farmers are also being trained on conservation, improvement and use of traditional/ indigenous varieties through participatory variety selection.
    • Further, for access to seeds of these indigenous varieties, community seed banks have been established.

    Key varieties

    • Lalat and Improved Lalat (GI value: 54) as Low GI
    • Swarna, Sambha Mahsuri and Shaktiman (GI value <60) as intermediate GI have been identified

    There is no certification for GI (Glycemic Index) in rice in India.

    What is Glycemic Index (GI)?

    • GI is a number from 0 to 100 assigned to food, with pure glucose arbitrarily given the value of 100, which represents the relative rise in the blood glucose level two hours after consuming that food.
    • The GI of a specific food depends primarily on the quantity and type of carbohydrate it contains.
    • But it is also affected by the amount of entrapment of the carbohydrate molecules within the food, the fat and protein content of the food, the number of organic acids (or their salts) in the food, and whether it is cooked and, if so, how it is cooked.
    • A food is considered to have a low GI if it is 55 or less; high GI if 70 or more, and mid-range GI if 56 to 69.