💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF

Subject: Indian Society

  • Annual Status of Education Report (Rural) 2019

    The Annual Status of Education Report (ASER) 2019 (rural) was recently released by NGO Pratham.

    Highlights of the report

    • Only 16% of children in Class 1 in 26 surveyed rural districts can read text at the prescribed level, while almost 40% cannot even recognise letters.
    • Only 41% of these children could recognise two digit numbers.

    Private schools ahead

    • Of six-year olds in Class 1, 41.5% of those in private schools could read words in comparison to only 19% from government schools.
    • Similarly, 28% of those in government schools could do simple addition as against 47% in private schools.
    • This gap is further exacerbated by a gender divide: only 39% of girls aged 6-8 are enrolled in private schools in comparison to almost 48% of boys.
    • The report also found that a classroom could include students from a range of age-groups, skewing towards younger children in government schools.

    Determinants of learning outcomes

    • The ASER report shows that a large number of factors determine the quality of education received at this stage, including the child’s home background, especially the mother’s education level; the type of school, whether anganwadis, government schools or private pre-schools; and the child’s age in Class 1.
    • More than a quarter of Class 1 students in government schools are only 4 or 5 years old, younger than the recommended age.
    • The ASER data shows that these younger children struggle more than others in all skills.
    • Permitting underage children into primary grades puts them at a learning disadvantage which is difficult to overcome,” said the report.

    Role of Mothers

    • Among the key findings of ASER 2019 is that the mother’s education often determines the kind of pre-schooling or schooling that the child gets.
    • The report says that among children in the early years (ages 0-8), those with mothers who had completed eight or fewer years of schooling are more likely to be attending anganwadis or government pre-primary classes.
    • With 75% women in the productive age group not in the workforce, they can be better engaged in their children’s development, learning and school readiness.

    Key suggestions made by the report

    • ASER found that the solution is not to spend longer hours teaching children the 3Rs.
    • Counter-intuitively, the report argues that a focus on cognitive skills rather than subject learning in the early years can make a big difference to basic literacy and numeracy abilities.
    • The survey shows that among Class 1 children who could correctly do none or only one of the tasks requiring cognitive skills, about 14% could read words, while 19% could do single digit addition.
    • However, of those children who could correctly do all three cognitive tasks, 52% could read words, and 63% could solve the addition problem.

    Focus on productive learning

    • ASER data shows that children’s performance on tasks requiring cognitive skills is strongly related to their ability to do early language and numeracy tasks,” says the report.
    • This suggests that focussing on play-based activities that build memory; reasoning and problem-solving abilities are more productive than an early focus on content knowledge.
    • Global research shows that 90% of brain growth occurs by age 5, meaning that the quality of early childhood education has a crucial impact on the development and long-term schooling of a child.
  • SATCOM technology

    The Rajasthan government has started using satellite communication technology in a big way to enhance the learning outcome in educational institutions and generate awareness about social welfare schemes while giving priority to the five aspirational districts selected by NITI Aayog in the State.

    SATCOM

    Rajasthan has taken an initiative to provide the facility of receive only terminals (ROT) and satellite interactive terminals (SIT) for getting the services of subject experts in the government schools and colleges and propagate various schemes in the remote areas with no Internet connectivity.

    What are ROT and SIT?

    • Satellite Interactive Terminal (SIT) is one of the six selected user networks used by CEC-UGC.
    • It is operating independently with their user terminals anywhere in the main land of India.
    • It has one main teaching end along with remote SITs and ROTs.
    • At present, there are over hundred SITs and ROTs under CEC EDUSAT network, installed at various colleges, and Universities across the country.

    Back2Basics

    EDUSAT

    • EDUSAT is the first Indian Satellite built exclusively for serving the educational sector. It was launched in September 2004 by the ISRO.
    • The satellite based distance education system enables virtual classrooms at rural and remote locations across the country.
    • Consortium for Educational Communication (CEC) has started two-way audio-video communication through EDUSAT network from 5th September 2005.
    • ISRO set up a nationwide multi-user educational network in its EDUSAT national Ku – band.
  • LGBT Rights – Transgender Bill, Sec. 377, etc.

    IPC & the need for modernisation


     

    The promise of criminal law as an instrument of safety is matched only by its power to destroy. It is arguably the most direct expression of the relationship between a state and its citizens.

    Amid the debate on the archaic sedition law that should have no place in democratic India, President Pranab Mukherjee said that the IPC, 1860 requires a thorough revision to meet the needs of the 21st century. Click here to know everything about sedition law

    History:

    • The code was drafted in 1860 on the recommendations of first law commission of India established in 1834 under the Government of India Act 1833 under the Chairmanship of Thomas Babington MacaulayAnswer in comments.>
    • It came into force in British India(but not princely states) during the early British Raj period in 1862
    • After the partition of the British Indian Empire, the Indian Penal Code was inherited by its successor states, the Dominion of India and the Dominion of Pakistan, where it continues independently as the Pakistan Penal Code and later in B’desh also
    • Jammu and Kashmir does not follow IPC but has enacted a separate code known as Ranbir Penal Code (RPC) which is based on IPC

    Some notable points:

    • The IPC replaced Mohammedan Criminal Law, which had a very close relationship with Islam. Thus, the IPC laid the foundation of secularism
    • It was widely appreciated as a state-of-the-art code and was, indeed, the first codification of criminal law in the British Empire
    • Today, it is the longest serving criminal code in the common-law world
    • Today, most of the commonwealth follows the IPC

    Law Commission on IPC:

    • 42nd Report (1971)– Law Commission of India for the first time had recommended the repeal of Section 309 (criminalization of suicide)
    • 172nd Report (2000)– Recommended deletion of Section 377 (criminalization of unnatural sexual offences)
    • 210th Report (2008)– Recommended Humanization and Decriminalization of Attempt to Suicide under Section 309

    Past attempts at amendment:

    • Even though the IPC has been haphazardly amended more than 75 times, no comprehensive revision has been undertaken in spite of the 42nd report of the Law Commission in 1971 recommending it
    • Also the amendment bills of 1971 and 1978 lapsed due to the dissolution of the Lok Sabha
    • As a result, largely the courts have had to undertake this task, with unsatisfactory outcomes at times
    • Most amendments have been ad hoc and reactive, in response to immediate circumstances like the 2013 amendment after the Delhi gangrape case

    Why amend IPC?

    • The philosophical stance and fundamental principles of Macaulay’s code were the product of imperialist policy <designed to meet colonial needs to subjugation and exploitation of India and Indians, sedition law for instance>
    • Some of the concepts underlying the code are either problematic or have become obsolete
    • there are many new offences, which have to be properly defined and incorporated in the code
    • Macaulay had himself favoured regular revision of the code whenever gaps or ambiguities were found or experienced
    • In 1860, the IPC was certainly ahead of the times but has been unable to keep pace since then

    Specific cases or problems:

    1. Sedition law, inserted in 1898: It is legitimate to ask whether we need a law on sedition that we ourselves condemned during the Raj. Learn more about sedition law here
    2. Section 295A, The offence of blasphemy: It should have no place in a liberal democracy
    3. Criminal conspiracy: It can be invoked merely when two people agree to commit an offence without any overt act following the agreement.
      It was added in 1913 by the colonial masters to deal with political conspiracies.
      Kehar Singh etc were convicted and sentenced to death under the offence of conspiracy ,, though none of them participated in the actual crime or were present at the scene of the crime.
    4. Section 149, Unlawful assembly: The principle of constructive liability under this law is pushed to unduly harsh lengths.
      Mere membership of the assembly without any participation in the actual crime is sufficient for punishment.
      Several persons have been sentenced to death and hanged though they were not even present near the scene of the actual crime.
    5. The distinction between “culpable homicide” and “murder” is criticised as the “weakest part of the code”, as the definitions are obscure
    6. Sexual offences under the code reveal patriarchal values and Victorian morality.
    7. Section 377:  Unnatural sexual offences (LGBT right). Want to know about argument of Delhi high court in decriminalizing homosexuality, click here to read about Naz Foundation case

     

    Contrarian view point of Justice Hegde

    We should not repeal something just because it’s 150 years old.

    On Sedition: He favours the sedition law as some restrictions are needed to stop people from abusing and talking against the country. “I believe in sedition law. I am a patriot. Any patriot cannot go on abusing the country. There are certain parameters.” He points to distinction b/w criticizing the person (prime minister), policies, system v/s abusing the state

    On IPC:  We can not just scrap Indian Penal Code because somebody is involved in a crime (and wants it to be scrapped)

    We can not just ape west. Ground realities in India and west are very different and they demand different levels of freedom of expression and religious freedom.