💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (August Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Subject: International Relations

  • Winding up the clock of India-Nepal Ties

    Introduction

    On October 1, 2025, RBI Governor Shaktikanta Das unveiled steps to deepen INR–NPR linkages. This move signals India’s intent to make the rupee a regional trade and investment currency. These include:

    1. Allowing Authorised Dealer (AD) banks to lend INR to non-residents from Nepal, Bhutan, and Sri Lanka.
    2. Permitting Special Rupee Vostro Accounts for foreign banks to hold Indian bonds and corporate papers.
    3. Establishing a transparent reference rate for major trading partner currencies to facilitate INR-based transactions.

    This marks a strategic departure from decades of tightly controlled cross border monetary flows. It aligns with India’s ambition to make the rupee a “South Asian Settlement Currency” and deepen economic resilience across borders.

    The Significance of RBI’s Move:

    1. Internationalisation of INR: Strengthens INR’s role as a regional settlement currency, reducing dependence on the dollar.
    2. Cross border integration: Enables Nepal, Bhutan, and Sri Lanka to engage in INR based transactions, supporting regional financial stability.
    3. Investor confidence: Allows Nepalese investors to diversify holdings in Indian bonds and securities.
    4. Trade facilitation: Establishes a transparent mechanism for pricing and settlement of bilateral trade.

    The Hurdles in Nepal

    1. COVID-19 Economic Fallout: Nepal’s economy struggled with post-pandemic recovery as industrial performance remained weak.
    2. Credit Crunch: Low confidence among banks led to restricted lending, making it difficult for small businesses to sustain.
    3. Supply Chain Strain: Domestic credit shortages impacted internal supply chains and imports, amplifying inflationary pressures.
    4. Structural Weakness: Chronic trade deficit, narrow industrial base, and dependency on remittances limit growth resilience.
    5. Political Uncertainty: Frequent political instability has deepened investor hesitation.

    How India’s Lending Outreach Could Change the Game

    1. Rupee Lending Window: RBI’s INR credit facility allows Nepalese firms to access Indian capital markets, easing liquidity pressure.
    2. Reduced Dollar Dependence: Using INR for trade and lending could insulate both economies from dollar exchange fluctuations.
    3. Enhanced Trust: Transparent reference rates can reduce cross border settlement disputes and improve institutional confidence.
    4. Joint Ventures: Encourages cross border investments and participation in sectors like hydropower, manufacturing, and tourism.

    The Trade Equation Between India and Nepal

    1. High Interdependence: India remains Nepal’s largest trading partner, accounting for 65% of its total trade.
    2. FDI Flows: India is Nepal’s largest FDI source, contributing 33% of total foreign investment, worth nearly $670 million.
    3. Export–Import Composition: India imports billion dollar worth of goods from Nepal, including coffee, tea, and herbal products, while exporting essential commodities and petroleum.
    4. Monetary Peg: The INR–NPR peg (₹1 = NPR 1.6) has stabilised bilateral transactions for decades, but rising inflation and dollar volatility demand recalibration.

    Challenges to Implementation

    1. Institutional Compliance: Nepal Rastra Bank (NRB) must reform regulatory processes to align with RBI’s updated norms.
    2. Risk of Overdependence: Over reliance on INR could expose Nepal’s economy to India’s monetary shocks.
    3. Operational Barriers: Currency convertibility limits and legal harmonisation may delay smooth execution.
    4. Political Sensitivity: Perception of “rupee dominance” may spark internal opposition in Nepal’s political circles.

    Possible Multiplier Effects

    1. Stronger INR: If successfully implemented, the move can strengthen INR internationally while stabilising Nepal’s currency.
    2. Reduced Dollar Outflows: Bilateral INR use saves foreign exchange reserves, improving both nations’ current account positions.
    3. Boost to Trade Financing: Easier credit availability to Nepalese traders can expand import capacity for Indian goods.
    4. Regional Model: Success may inspire replication with Bhutan, Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh under the Neighbourhood First Policy.

    Conclusion

    The RBI’s initiative represents more than a banking reform, it is a strategic assertion of economic diplomacy in South Asia. By aligning monetary instruments with foreign policy, India aims to create a shared financial ecosystem that stabilises its neighbourhood while propelling the rupee towards international recognition. For Nepal, this marks a chance to integrate deeper into India’s growth story and move towards sustainable, confidence driven development.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2018] How would the recent phenomena of protectionism and currency manipulations in world trade affect macroeconomic stability of India?

    Linkage: This question relates to currency stability and external sector management. The RBI–Nepal rupee measures reflect India’s proactive approach to enhance rupee resilience and reduce dollar dependence, aligning with UPSC’s recurring focus on monetary stability and economic diplomacy.

    Value Addition

    Internationalisation of the Indian Rupee (INR)

    • Definition: Internationalisation of the rupee refers to the increasing use of INR in cross-border trade, investment, and financial transactions, reducing reliance on foreign currencies like the US dollar.
    • Objective: Strengthen India’s economic sovereignty, reduce exchange rate risk, and enhance global confidence in the rupee as a settlement currency.
    • Recent Policy Measures:
      • RBI’s 2022 Circular: Allowed INR invoicing and settlement of international trade.
      • Special Vostro Accounts: Enabled partner nations (e.g., Russia, UAE, Nepal) to hold rupee balances for bilateral trade.
      • RBI–Nepal Measures (2025): Permitted INR lending, rupee-based bonds, and reference rate mechanisms.
      • INR–Dirham Linkage: Facilitated oil payments in rupees via UAE, strengthening South–South trade.
    • Benefits:
      • Reduces Forex Outflows: Decreases demand for dollars in trade settlements.
      • Improves External Stability: Mitigates impact of global currency volatility.
      • Boosts Trade Competitiveness: Simplifies invoicing for neighbouring countries.
      • Supports Regional Integration: Promotes South Asian financial architecture anchored in INR.
      • Enhances India’s Soft Power: Projects rupee as a symbol of economic strength and trust.
    • Challenges:
      • Limited convertibility of INR in capital account.
      • Regulatory asymmetry among trading partners.
      • Need for deep rupee-denominated financial markets abroad.
      • Possible geopolitical resistance to India’s monetary expansion.
    • Global Examples:
      • China’s Yuan (CNY): Integrated into IMF’s SDR basket (2016).
      • Euro (EUR): Serves as a model for regional monetary integration.
    • Reports & Committees:
      • RBI Inter-Departmental Group (2023): Highlighted steps for gradual and phased INR internationalisation.
      • IMF Report (2023): Identified INR among potential emerging reserve currencies.

     

  • East Timor: Asia’s youngest nation joins ASEAN

    Why in the News?

    East Timor (Timor-Leste) was formally admitted as the 11th member of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) during the summit in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

    East Timor: Asia’s youngest nation joins ASEAN

    What is the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)?

    • Establishment: Founded in 1967 by Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand through the Bangkok Declaration.
    • Purpose: To promote economic growth, political stability, regional peace, and cultural cooperation in Southeast Asia.
    • Membership: 11 nations – Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam, and East Timor.
    • Institutional Pillars:
      • Political-Security Community,
      • Economic Community,
      • Socio-Cultural Community.
    • Legal Framework: The ASEAN Charter (2008) gave it a legal identity and deepened integration on the EU model.
    • Economic Scale: Represents 680 million people with a combined GDP > $3.8 trillion, making it a leading global growth hub.
    • External Partnerships: Engages India, China, Japan, USA, Australia, etc., through forums like the East Asia Summit (EAS) and ASEAN Plus Six.

    About East Timor (Timor-Leste):

    • Location: Situated in Southeast Asia, occupying the eastern half of Timor Island, bordered by Indonesia (west) and Australia (south).
    • Colonial History: A Portuguese colony for 400+ years until Indonesia’s invasion in 1975, shortly after a brief independence.
    • Independence: Achieved full sovereignty in 2002 following the UN-supervised 1999 referendum ending 24 years of occupation.
    • Demographics: Population ≈1.4 million; 42% below poverty line; two-thirds under age 30, making employment creation a core policy focus.
    • Economy: Dependent on oil and gas revenues, now diversifying toward agriculture, tourism, and digital infrastructure due to depleting reserves.
    • Political Leadership: Led by PM Xanana Gusmao and President Jose Ramos-Horta (1996 Nobel Peace Prize laureate).
    • Regional Integration: Became ASEAN’s 11th member in Oct 2025, marking the bloc’s first expansion since 1999.
    [UPSC 2009] Consider the following countries:

    1. Brunei Darussalam 2. East Timor 3. Laos Which of the above is/are member/members of ASEAN?

    Options: (a) 1 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 1 and 3 only* (d) 1,2 and 3

     

  • [24th October 2025] The Hindu Oped: The UN matters, as a symbol of possibility

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2025] The reform process in the United Nations remains unaccomplished because of the delicate imbalance of East and West and entanglement of the USA vs. Russo-Chinese alliance. Examine and critically evaluate the East-West policy confrontations in this regard.

    Linkage: UN is an important and recurring UPSC theme, often asked through its agencies and reform debates. This question is crucial as it probes the East–West power imbalance that hinders UN reform, echoing the article’s call for a more representative global order.

    Mentor’s Comment

    The article reviews the United Nations (UN) at 80 years, analysing its evolution, global role, and urgent need for institutional reform. It explores India’s position on UNSC restructuring, challenges of multilateralism, and the UN’s normative impact on global governance. For UPSC aspirants, the theme directly links with GS Paper II, international institutions, global order, and India’s diplomacy.

    Introduction

    Formed after World War II to preserve peace and promote human dignity, the UN evolved from a Cold War arena to a forum for cooperative problem-solving. The institution remains indispensable but requires deep reform to stay relevant in a multipolar and interconnected world.

    Reforming the UN: Adapting to a Shifting Global Order

    1. Foundational Context: Established in 1945 as a peace mechanism ensuring collective security, equality of states, and global legal order
    2. Changing Landscape: Transitioned from bipolarity (US–USSR) to unipolarity and now multipolarity marked by fragmented alliances and transnational threats such as climate change and cyber warfare.
    3. Institutional Lag: UNSC composition reflects post-1945 power hierarchy. Exclusion of emerging powers, India, Japan, Germany, Brazil, South Africa, undermines legitimacy and efficiency.
    4. Legitimacy and Representation: Outdated representation erodes the Council’s credibility, weakening enforcement capacity and consensus-building.

    UN’s Humanitarian and Normative Relevance

    1. Humanitarian Operations: UNHCR, WFP, and UNICEF deliver critical relief during conflicts and disasters, providing food, shelter, and protection.
    2. Peacekeeping Mandate: Blue Helmets ensure limited stability in fragile regions, sustaining fragile ceasefires and aiding post-conflict recovery.
    3. Norm Creation: UN conventions and declarations define global standards for human rights, gender equality, and sustainable development.
      The SDGs (2015) frame a universal agenda for inclusive and sustainable growth.
    4. Symbolic Value: Represents a global forum for dialogue, ensuring that multilateralism remains the default mechanism for peace and justice.

    Institutional Weaknesses and Reform Imperatives

    1. Erosion of Liberal Multilateralism: Rising nationalism and protectionism weaken commitment to collective decision-making.
    2. Structural Constraints: Permanent members’ veto power perpetuates paralysis in humanitarian crises.
    3. Financial Fragility: Budgetary shortfalls from delayed dues (notably by major contributors) constrain operational capacity and staffing.
    4. Operational Agility: Requires digitisation, decentralised response mechanisms, and enhanced decision-making authority at field levels.

    India’s Strategic Position in Global Governance

    1. India’s Credentials: World’s largest democracy, major troop-contributor to peacekeeping missions, and growing economic power.
    2. UNSC Reform Advocacy: Demands structural reform ensuring equitable and inclusive representation of developing nations.
    3. Strategic Autonomy: Follows independent policy avoiding bloc alignment while protecting regional and developmental interests.
    4. Vision for Reform: Supports dignity-based multilateralism ensuring sovereignty, cooperation, and equity among nations.

    Mandate for Renewal and Reform

    1. Council Reconfiguration: Expands permanent and non-permanent seats to reflect current geopolitical realities.
    2. Institutional Agility: Enhances crisis responsiveness through digital integration, rapid funding, and empowered missions.
    3. Moral Authority: Restores credibility by reaffirming adherence to international law and ethical neutrality in decision-making.
    4. Member-State Commitment: Ensures predictable funding and sustained political backing from member nations to strengthen UN institutions.

    Conclusion

    The UN remains a vital, evolving institution balancing ideals with realpolitik. Its effectiveness depends on reform, representation, and renewed moral purpose. Relevance in the 21st century rests on its ability to become more inclusive, responsive, and legitimate.

  • [23rd October 2025] The Hindu Oped: Immigration and the politics of fear

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2020] Indian diaspora has a decisive role to play in the politics and economy of America and European Countries.” Comment with examples.

    Linkage: This article explores how anti-immigration politics in the West, particularly in the UK and US, are reshaping narratives around migrants and minorities, directly affecting the Indian diaspora’s political influence, integration, and image abroad. It also relates to how domestic nativism in developed nations influences India’s soft power and global engagement strategy.

    Mentor’s Comment

    The debate on immigration has taken a darker turn across the Western world, shifting from managing illegal immigration to rejecting legal migrants on cultural or racial grounds. This piece examines the rise of fear-driven politics in the United Kingdom and the United States, where populist leaders exploit insecurities about identity and belonging. It connects these global trends to India’s own discourse on “infiltrators,” highlighting how such politics corrodes the moral and spiritual foundation of nationhood. For UPSC aspirants, this article is a rich resource for themes under GS Paper 2 (Polity & Governance, International Relations) and GS Paper 4 (Ethics & Society).

    Introduction: The New Politics of Immigration

    Immigration has always been an emotionally charged issue, balancing national security, cultural identity, and humanitarian values. But the tone of the conversation has changed drastically. Once focused on border control and illegal entry, the global discourse, led by figures like Donald Trump and echoed by British leaders, is now turning against legal migrants themselves. The recent developments in the United Kingdom, coupled with populist rhetoric in the U.S., mark a disturbing shift from policy debates to identity-based fear-mongering. It signals a new era where politics thrives on division, and where the very definition of nationhood is under siege.

    Why in the News?

    At the UN General Assembly, U.S. President Donald Trump openly urged Europe to “end the failed experiment of open borders,” marking the first time an American leader exported his anti-immigrant ideology so aggressively to other nations. The U.K. soon reflected similar sentiments, not just against illegal immigrants but against those living legally under Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR). The political shift shows how nativist populism has evolved from fringe rhetoric to mainstream governance, posing moral and democratic questions for societies that once celebrated diversity.

    How Has Immigration Politics Shifted in the UK?

    1. Shift from legality to identity: The focus has moved from illegal immigration control to questioning legal migrants’ right to belong.
    2. Historic continuity: Britain has witnessed recurring anti-immigrant waves, from Enoch Powell’s 1968 “Rivers of Blood” speech to Brexit’s “Take Back Control” slogan.
    3. Turning point: Trump’s UN speech and UK’s Reform Party rhetoric signify a pivot, from economic capability to cultural exclusion.

    What Recent Events Sparked the Debate?

    1. Mass rallies: Far-right leader Tommy Robinson led a 1,50,000-strong “Unite the Kingdom” rally, posing as a free speech movement but fuelled by anti-immigration anger.
    2. Imported ideology: French politician Eric Zemmour warned of the “great replacement”, the idea that European people are being replaced by immigrants from Muslim-majority regions.
    3. Policy proposal: Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party proposed scrapping Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR) and replacing it with stricter five-year visas.
    4. Consequences: Even current ILR holders and retirees would face uncertainty, eroding the social contract between the state and its residents.

    How Has the Labour Government Responded?

    1. Raising the bar: New Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood extended ILR eligibility from 5 to 10 years, with higher English proficiency, employment verification, and volunteering requirements.
    2. Moral hierarchy: This creates a two-tier society, citizens who live freely and migrants forced to constantly prove their worth.
    3. Political motive: Labour’s move reflects a competitive hardline stance to match Reform UK’s popularity and counter populist fear politics.

    How Is Race Re-entering the Immigration Discourse?

    1. Racial undertones: Conservative politician Robert Jenrick’s remark about “not seeing another white face” reveals how immigration rhetoric is slipping into racial anxiety.
    2. From migrants to race: The debate is no longer about work permits or visas; it’s now about who belongs and who looks British.
    3. American parallels: Trump’s attempt to revoke birthright citizenship and the spectacle of deporting Indian immigrants in shackles echo the same moral crisis, dehumanisation of the “other.”

    What Lessons Does This Hold for India?

    1. Mirroring patterns: In India too, discourse on “infiltrators” and “termites” has been used for populist mobilisation.
    2. Ernest Renan’s vision: The 19th-century philosopher described a nation as a “spiritual principle”, based on shared memories and mutual consent, not race or religion.
    3. Moral erosion: When “present consent”, the will to live together, is weakened, nations lose their moral foundation.
    4. Performative cruelty: Treating migration as a threat rather than a socio-economic phenomenon serves political ends, not human progress.

    Conclusion

    The politics of fear around immigration reflects a deeper crisis, of identity, belonging, and moral leadership. When democratic societies redefine “worthiness” in racial or cultural terms, they betray the inclusive principles that built them. In both the West and India, the challenge is not just managing immigration but reaffirming what it means to be a nation. As Renan reminded us, a nation exists not by blood or border, but by the desire to live together. Upholding that desire, amid fear and division, is the true test of our times.

  • International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism (CFT)

    Why in the News?

    Iran has officially ratified the UN International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism (CFT), signalling a major policy shift toward international financial reintegration.

    Why such move by Iran?

    • Economic Isolation: Iran’s blacklisting by FATF in 2020 and U.S.-led sanctions have severely restricted its banking access, trade, and foreign investment.
    • Reformist Agenda: President Pezeshkian’s government seeks economic stabilization through engagement, not confrontation, with Western institutions.
    • Trade Barriers: Even traditional allies like Russia and China face difficulty trading with Iran due to its non-compliance with FATF norms.
    • Diplomatic Leverage: CFT accession signals willingness to reform and could help Tehran negotiate sanction relief or trade facilitation.
    • Political Balance: The government faces domestic opposition from hardliners who fear the law will expose Iran’s support for groups like Hezbollah and Hamas, but reformists view it as essential for economic recovery.

    About the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism (CFT):

    • Adopted: 1999 by the UN General Assembly; entered into force in 2002.
    • Parties: Ratified by 188 countries including India, making it one of the most widely accepted anti-terror treaties.
    • Objective: To criminalize, prevent, and punish the financing of terrorism and enhance international cooperation against terror-linked financial networks.
    • Definition: Financing terrorism includes collecting or providing funds—directly or indirectly—with intent or knowledge that they will be used for terrorist acts causing death or injury to civilians or non-combatants.
    • Key Provisions:
      • States must criminalize terror financing in domestic law.
      • Freeze, seize, and confiscate assets linked to terrorism.
      • Ban misuse of banking secrecy to block investigations.
      • Facilitate extradition, legal cooperation, and mutual assistance.
      • Ensure political or ideological motives cannot justify terrorist financing.
    • Legal Mechanism: Creates obligations for states to report suspicious transactions and cooperate across jurisdictions for enforcement.

    FATF and CFT: Complementary Global Frameworks

    • CFT (1999): Provides the legal foundation, obligating states to define and criminalize terror financing under international law.
    • FATF (1989): Provides the operational and policy framework, setting 40 detailed recommendations for implementation, monitoring, and compliance.
    • Interaction:
      • FATF requires its members to implement CFT obligations in national systems.
      • CFT establishes criminalization and cooperation, while FATF ensures compliance, enforcement, and evaluation.
    • Iran’s Case:
      • FATF blacklisted Iran for failure to adopt CFT and AML standards.
      • Ratification of CFT is Iran’s first step toward FATF re-evaluation and possible removal from the blacklist.
      • Compliance would enable Iranian banks to restore correspondent relations and resume limited international transactions.

  • Turning Tides: Pakistan-Afghanistan Tensions

    Introduction

    When the Taliban recaptured Kabul in August 2021, Pakistan perceived it as a strategic victory after two decades of covert support to the insurgents. However, the celebration was short-lived. Four years later, Pakistan faces an unprecedented internal security crisis, with over 2,400 people killed in militancy-related violence in 2025 alone. The rise of the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and recent Pakistani airstrikes on Kabul (October 2025) signal a dangerous escalation — and a stark reversal of the country’s long-standing policy of using non-state actors as strategic assets.

    Why in the News?

    For the first time, Pakistan bombed Kabul, directly targeting militants across the Afghan border. This marks a major policy shift, as Islamabad traditionally treated the Taliban as an ally and buffer against India. The strikes came while Afghan Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi was visiting India, adding a symbolic twist to regional alignments. The scale of violence, with over 2,414 deaths this year, underscores the depth of Pakistan’s internal crisis and its failure to control militancy in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. This development has drawn comparisons to India’s own doctrine of cross-border strikes, raising questions about whether Pakistan is now borrowing from a playbook it once condemned.

    The Illusion of Strategic Depth

    1. Taliban Patronage: Pakistan’s military establishment nurtured the Afghan Taliban for decades, offering refuge and logistical support during their insurgency against the U.S.-backed Afghan government.
    2. Strategic Depth Doctrine: Islamabad’s rationale was to create a friendly regime in Kabul that could serve as a buffer against India and offer “strategic depth” in case of war.
    3. Backfiring Reality: Instead, the Taliban’s rise empowered the TTP, an ideologically aligned but operationally separate entity, turning Pakistan’s proxy into its nemesis.

    How the Taliban’s Return Changed the Equation

    1. End of Patron-Client Relationship: Once in power, the Taliban sought state-to-state relations, not subservience to Pakistan’s military agenda.
    2. Durand Line Dispute: Kabul never recognized the Durand Line, reigniting border tensions that colonial history had left unresolved.
    3. TTP Empowerment: Inspired by the Afghan Taliban’s triumph, the TTP now demands enforcement of strict Islamic law and reversal of the merger of tribal areas with Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
    4. Refugee Crisis: Pakistan’s decision to deport thousands of Afghan refugees further worsened ties, adding a humanitarian dimension to political hostility.

    Pakistan’s New Doctrine: Borrowing from India?

    1. Airstrikes as Deterrence: By bombing Kabul, Pakistan appears to be testing a new counter-terrorism strategy, directly holding Afghanistan responsible for cross-border militant attacks.
    2. India Parallel: The move is reminiscent of India’s 2016 and 2019 strikes on Pakistani territory after terror attacks in Uri and Pulwama.
    3. Diplomatic Irony: The timing, coinciding with the Afghan FM’s India visit, highlights shifting regional equations where India engages diplomatically, and Pakistan responds militarily.

    The Security Crisis within Pakistan

    1. Rising Violence: The Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province has become the epicenter of TTP-led insurgency.
    2. Contradictory Policy: Pakistan’s dual policy of fighting terrorism while nurturing militants targeting its neighbors has eroded domestic stability.
    3. Blowback Effect: Militancy now threatens Pakistan’s political order, economic recovery, and regional credibility.
    4. Qatar-Brokered Ceasefire: A fragile truce mediated by Qatar hints at the international community’s anxiety over a new South Asian flashpoint.

    Why Pakistan’s Strategy is Self-Defeating

    1. Cycle of Violence: Airstrikes may offer short-term political gains but deepen long-term instability.
    2. Internal vs External Conflict: Pakistan’s greatest threat now emanates from within its borders, not across them.
    3. Loss of Moral Credibility: Its past of backing non-state actors undercuts its legitimacy when accusing others of the same.
    4. Strategic Isolation: Continued conflict risks alienating even traditional allies like China and Gulf states, who seek regional stability.

    Conclusion

    Pakistan’s experiment with militant patronage has collapsed under its own contradictions. The strategic depth doctrine that once defined its Afghan policy has morphed into a strategic liability. Peace in Pakistan cannot be achieved through bombs over Kabul, but through a coherent internal reform of its security, political, and ideological ecosystem. As the editorial aptly concludes, “Pakistan cannot ensure internal security by bombing Afghanistan.”

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2013] The proposed withdrawal of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) from Afghanistan in 2014 is fraught with major security implications for the countries of the region. Examine in light of the fact that India is faced with a plethora of challenges and needs to safeguard its own strategic interests.

    Linkage: The 2013 PYQ and this 2025 editorial both explore the Afghan theatre as a pivot of regional security, then, in anticipation of instability; now, in its full manifestation. Both are invaluable for analysing India’s neighbourhood policy, counter-terror strategy, and regional diplomacy in the post-US Afghanistan order.

  • [18th October 2025] The Hindu Op-ed: Better global governance led by China and India

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2023] Virus of Conflict is affecting the functioning of the SCO.” In the light of the above statement, point out the role of India in mitigating problems.

    Linkage: This PYQ is important as it tests India’s diplomatic balance within the SCO, amid regional rivalries. The article connects by showing how the Xi–Modi meeting and Global Governance Initiative reflect India’s role in restoring trust and strengthening multilateralism within the SCO framework.

    Mentor’s Comment

    As the world enters a phase of geopolitical churn and institutional fatigue, the call for a reformed, people-centric global governance system grows louder. The 75th anniversary of India-China diplomatic ties and the 80th year of the UN offer a historical moment: two Asian giants, once colonised, now rising powers, can redefine global order. For UPSC aspirants, this theme bridges multilateral diplomacy, global reforms, and India’s evolving foreign policy—key areas across GS Paper 2 and IR essays.

    Introduction

    The year 2025 marks a milestone in both bilateral and global history. India and China, home to over 2.8 billion people, commemorate 75 years of diplomatic relations, even as the United Nations celebrates its 80th anniversary. Against the backdrop of unilateralism and weakening multilateralism, the Global Governance Initiative (GGI) proposed by China, with India’s cooperation, offers a blueprint for a more equitable international order. As Asia’s two leading powers move from rivalry to partnership, their convergence could transform the world’s governance architecture, symbolising a decisive shift toward multipolarity and shared prosperity.

    Why is the India-China cooperation in 2025 a landmark moment?

    1. Historical Context: The two leaders, Xi Jinping and Narendra Modi, have met 18 times since 2014, an unprecedented frequency symbolising sustained engagement despite border tensions.
    2. Symbolic Restoration: The bilateral meeting at the 16th BRICS Summit in Kazan (2024) and now at the 25th SCO Summit in Tianjin (2025) reflects a conscious reset in relations.
    3. Global Expectation: Their 19th meeting during the Tianjin Summit is being seen globally as a moment to restore balance to multilateral decision-making, especially amid Western dominance fatigue.
    4. Public Diplomacy: Both sides emphasise “partners, not rivals,” signaling a shift from competition to cooperation.

    What is changing in the global governance discourse?

    1. Erosion of Trust: The early 21st century witnessed rising unilateralism, protectionism, and hegemonism, eroding faith in international institutions.
    2. UN at 80: The UN system, though foundational, now faces criticism for its limited representation of developing nations and sluggish response to global crises.
    3. Reform Imperative: The question before humanity is not just “who governs” but “how governance is shared.” The article highlights the need for reform without rupture, evolving existing systems rather than replacing them.
    4. Asia’s Moment: The decline of Western dominance and the rise of Asia and Eurasia are redefining the rules of the game, with India and China at the center.

    What is the Global Governance Initiative (GGI)?

    1. New Vision: The GGI, announced by President Xi at the Tianjin SCO Summit, aims to correct the deficit in global governance by promoting a fair, inclusive order.
    • Five Core Principles:
      1. Sovereign Equality: Respect for all nations’ independence and dignity; greater democracy in international relations.
      2. Rule of Law: Equal application of international law and rejection of double standards.
      3. Multilateralism: Strengthening the UN as the core platform for global decision-making.
      4. People-Centric Approach: Governance should prioritise well-being, safety, and fulfillment of citizens globally.
      5. Real Results Orientation: Developed nations must shoulder more responsibility, while developing nations must cooperate for shared solutions.
      6. Essence: The GGI is not about creating parallel institutions but reforming and improving existing ones to respond effectively to modern challenges.

    How can India-China cooperation strengthen multilateralism?

    1. Shared Responsibilities: Both countries, as major developing economies and SCO/BRICS members, bear the responsibility to defend international fairness and justice.
    2. Strategic Coordination: The leaders’ dialogue stresses communication on major international and regional issues to bridge divides in the Global South.

    Complementary Visions:

    1. China’s “community of shared future for mankind”
    2. India’s “Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam” (One Earth, One Family, One Future)
    3. Together, they embody the moral and developmental leadership needed for a post-Western global order.
    4. Practical Gains: Resumption of direct flights, maintenance of border stability, and enhanced trade cooperation show concrete steps toward normalisation.

    What challenges lie ahead for India-China collaboration?

    1. Trust Deficit: Lingering border disputes and differing political models may slow strategic trust-building.
    2. Competing Ambitions: While both aspire to leadership in the Global South, perception management and narrative balance will be crucial.
    3. Western Reaction: The West may perceive India-China cooperation as a counterweight to transatlantic power, potentially complicating India’s strategic autonomy.
    4. Need for Institutionalisation: Long-term progress demands institutional mechanisms, track-II dialogues, multilateral coordination cells, and joint UN reform working groups.

    Conclusion

    The India-China partnership in 2025 signals more than a diplomatic milestone, it represents a potential rebalancing of world order. As the UN turns 80, the call for shared leadership between emerging powers grows urgent. If pursued with mutual trust and strategic maturity, the GGI-led collaboration can make the 21st century truly an Asian century rooted in equity, inclusivity, and sustainability. In a fractured world, cooperation, not competition, may be the only path to survival and progress.

  • UN Global Geospatial Information Management for Asia and the Pacific (UN-GGIM-AP)

    Why in the News?

    India has been elected as Co-Chair of the Regional Committee of the United Nations Global Geospatial Information Management for Asia and the Pacific (UN-GGIM-AP) for a three-year term till 2028.

    About UN-GGIM-Asia and the Pacific (UN-GGIM-AP):

    • Objective: Maximises social, economic, and environmental benefits of geospatial data through regional collaboration, innovation, and policy harmonisation.
    • Overview: It is one of the five regional committees under the UN Committee of Experts on Global Geospatial Information Management (UN-GGIM).
    • Function: Serves as the highest inter-governmental platform in the region for joint decision-making on geospatial data generation, governance, and utilisation.
    • Mandate: Coordinates geospatial policy, promotes data standardisation, and supports applications in sustainable development, disaster management, and environmental monitoring.
    • Establishment: Formed in 1995 as the Permanent Committee on GIS Infrastructure for Asia and the Pacific (PCGIAP); rebranded in 2012 following UN-GGIM’s global launch in 2011.
    • Membership: Comprises 56 national geospatial agencies from across the Asia-Pacific region.
    • Secretariat: Hosted by the UN Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UN-ESCAP) since 2018, providing institutional and technical support.

    India’s Role and Significance:

    • Leadership Role: India elected Co-Chair (2025–2028), reflecting global recognition of its geospatial governance and digital mapping expertise.
    • Strategic Influence: Strengthens India’s position in regional policy formation, data ethics, and standardisation frameworks.
    • Policy Alignment: Complements India’s National Geospatial Policy 2022, Digital India, and PM GatiShakti National Master Plan initiatives.
    • Regional Contribution: India to lead capacity-building, data interoperability, and open-access frameworks for disaster management and climate resilience.
    • Institutional Integration: Links ISRO’s remote sensing and Survey of India’s ground mapping to regional development goals.
    • Global Impact: Positions India as a knowledge hub in geospatial innovation and ensures its active role in defining global spatial data standards for sustainable growth.
    [UPSC 2023]  Consider the following infrastructure sectors :

    1. Affordable housing 2. Mass rapid transport 3. Health care 4. Renewable energy

    On how many of the above does UNOPS Sustainable Investments in Infrastructure and Innovation (S3i) initiative focus for its investments?

    Options: (a) Only one (b) Only two (c) All three* (d) All four

     

  • Non-Aligned Movement (NAM)

    Why in the News?

    The 19th Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) Mid-Term Ministerial Meeting was recently held in Kampala, Uganda.

    About the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM)

    • Overview: A grouping of states not formally aligned with or against any major power bloc, established to uphold sovereignty, independence, and neutrality during the Cold War.
    • Formation: Founded in 1961 at Belgrade, Yugoslavia, emerging from the 1955 Bandung Conference (Indonesia) which laid down the Ten Principles of Bandung as its ideological foundation.
    • Founding Leaders:
      1. Jawaharlal Nehru (India)
      2. Gamal Abdel Nasser (Egypt)
      3. Josip Broz Tito (Yugoslavia)
      4. Ahmed Sukarno (Indonesia)
      5. Kwame Nkrumah (Ghana)
    • Membership:
      • 120 countries: 53 from Africa, 39 from Asia, 26 from Latin America & the Caribbean, and 2 from Europe.
      • Includes Palestine as a member and 17 observer nations with 10 observer organisations.
      • Represents nearly 60% of UN membership, making it the second-largest intergovernmental bloc after the UN.
    • Structure: NAM functions without a permanent secretariat, charter, or budget, relying on rotational leadership and consensus-driven decision-making.

    Non-Aligned Movement (NAM)

    India’s Contemporary Role in NAM:

    • India advocates for reinvigorating NAM as a platform for South-South cooperation in technology, trade, and climate resilience.
    • It seeks to make NAM relevant in a multipolar world, focusing on digital equity, global governance reforms, and sustainable development.
    • India views NAM not as an anti-West bloc but as a forum of balanced autonomy, promoting strategic non-alignment and global partnership in the 21st century.
    [UPSC 2009] Among the following Presidents of India, who was also the Secretary General of Non-Aligned Movement for some period ?

    Options: (a) Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan (b) Varahairi Venkatagiri (c) Giani Zail Singh * (d) Dr. Shanker Dayal Sharma

     

  • The future of the IMEC

    Introduction

    In an era where connectivity defines power, the India–Middle East–Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC) emerged as a visionary project connecting India’s western ports with Europe via the Arabian Peninsula. Envisaged as a multi-modal corridor encompassing maritime, rail, energy, and digital infrastructure, IMEC sought to integrate economies across continents while promoting peace and prosperity in a historically volatile region.

    However, the optimism that surrounded IMEC’s launch quickly met the harsh reality of geopolitics. The October 7 Hamas attacks and subsequent Israel–Gaza war exposed the fragility of West Asian stability, placing IMEC’s implementation in question. Yet, beyond the uncertainty lies an opportunity for India to reshape its connectivity vision, adapting routes and partnerships to new global dynamics.

    Why in the News

    The IMEC has resurfaced in policy discussions as its viability faces uncertainty amid the deteriorating West Asian security environment. The October 7 Hamas–Israel conflict disrupted regional optimism nurtured by the Abraham Accords and slowed progress on IMEC’s proposed transnational links. At the same time, climate-driven Arctic trade routes and Red Sea disruptions by the Houthis are redrawing global shipping patterns, forcing India and its partners to reconsider IMEC’s configuration. The issue is critical as the corridor represents both an economic and strategic counterweight to China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).

    The Strategic Vision Behind IMEC:

    1. Comprehensive Connectivity: IMEC aims to upgrade maritime routes between India and the Arabian Peninsula and establish high-speed rail links from UAE ports to Haifa, Israel, via Saudi Arabia and Jordan.
    2. Integration with Europe: From Haifa, goods would be shipped to Europe’s Mediterranean ports, ensuring faster, secure, and sustainable trade connectivity.
    3. Beyond Transport: The corridor also includes plans for a clean hydrogen pipeline, electricity cable, and high-speed undersea digital cable, linking energy and digital ecosystems across three continents.
    4. Strategic Objective: IMEC provides a non-Chinese, rules-based alternative to the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), enhancing India’s strategic outreach and economic influence.

    The Geopolitical Context of 2023:

    1. Favourable Climate: The Abraham Accords (2020) created optimism for regional peace, bringing Israel and several Arab states closer. This atmosphere facilitated multilateral cooperation frameworks such as I2U2 (India, Israel, UAE, U.S.), paving the way for IMEC.
    2. India’s Upward Trajectory: India’s improving ties with Saudi Arabia and the UAE, coupled with strong U.S. relations, allowed it to play a central role in IMEC’s conception.
    3. Global Endorsement: The corridor was launched at the G-20 Summit in Delhi, with support from the EU, France, Germany, Italy, and Saudi Arabia, underscoring India’s emergence as a trusted global partner.

    The Security Setback and Regional Volatility

    1. Conflict Shock: Within weeks of IMEC’s announcement, the Hamas–Israel conflict erupted, reversing the post-Abraham optimism.
    2. Regional Fallout: Israel’s military operations strained ties with Arab countries, undermining cross-border infrastructure cooperation.
    3. Red Sea Disruptions: The Houthi attacks on cargo ships forced rerouting via the Cape of Good Hope, increasing transit time and cost.
    4. Lesson: The events underscore that geopolitical stability remains the cornerstone of connectivity, and corridors like IMEC must remain adaptable to shifting realities.

    Europe’s Changing Maritime Interests

    1. Arctic Openings: Climate change has opened new northern sea routes, shortening Asia–Europe shipping times. Beneficiaries include Russia, the U.S., China, and northern European nations.
    2. Mediterranean Anxiety: Countries like Italy, dependent solely on the Mediterranean, fear economic marginalisation if Arctic routes dominate trade.
    3. Strategic Importance of IMEC: Hence, Mediterranean states see IMEC as a means to sustain their maritime relevance and diversify trade partnerships.
    4. India’s Role: For India, the Mediterranean remains vital, as Arctic routes offer no immediate logistical advantage.

    Why IMEC Still Matters for India

    1. Economic Scale: With $136 billion in annual trade, the EU remains India’s largest trading partner, highlighting the need for resilient connectivity.
    2. Supply Chain Resilience: IMEC offers a secure, shorter route connecting India to Europe while reducing dependence on the Red Sea–Suez chokepoint.
    3. Strategic Leverage: Enhanced engagement with Arab economies can dilute Pakistan’s influence and integrate India deeper into West Asia’s economic architecture.
    4. Innovation Space: As a multi-member initiative, IMEC allows India to propose new routes via Saudi Arabia and Egypt, adapting to political flux.

    Challenges and the Way Forward

    1. Security Dependencies: Ongoing instability in Gaza and Israel poses a persistent threat.
    2. Financial and Political Coordination: Multi-country infrastructure projects face coordination delays, regulatory inconsistencies, and funding constraints.
    3. Need for Parallel Efforts: India must also upgrade domestic ports and logistics infrastructure, including Sagarmala and Dedicated Freight Corridors, to complement IMEC.
    4. Diplomatic Continuity: Sustaining dialogue through I2U2 and G-20 cooperation can help preserve IMEC’s spirit even if its routes evolve.

    Conclusion

    The IMEC’s future will depend not merely on the pacification of West Asia but on the political agility and diplomatic imagination of its members. While the corridor’s physical routes may shift, its strategic essence remains intact, to build resilient, diversified, and sustainable connectivity between India and Europe. For India, IMEC is more than an infrastructure project; it is a statement of intent, to be at the centre of global supply chains and a stabilising power in a fractured world.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2018] The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is viewed as a cardinal subset of China’s larger ‘One Belt One Road’ initiative. Give a brief description of CPEC and enumerate the reasons why India has distanced itself from the same.

    Linkage: While China’s CPEC runs through disputed territory, making India wary, the IMEC shows how India is building its own clean, safe, and cooperative route to connect with Europe. It’s India’s way of staying in the global connectivity game—on its own terms.