💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (August Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Subject: International Relations

  • Amid the disruptions unleashed by the US President Trump, should India rethink its engagement with China, and to what extent?

    Introduction

    The India-China equation has once again come into focus with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi’s recent visit to India. Coming at a time when Donald Trump’s unpredictable moves are reshaping US–China relations and India faces pressure over its Russian oil purchases, the visit is being viewed as a tactical outreach by Beijing. For the first time since the Galwan clash, both sides agreed on a 10-point understanding, from reopening border trade points to restarting stalled dialogues. Yet, beneath the gestures of cooperation, deep mistrust lingers: unresolved tensions in Ladakh, Beijing’s quiet backing of Pakistan, and economic vulnerabilities that India cannot ignore. The central question remains, is this the start of a cautious reset, or will rivalry continue to define the relationship?

    Current State of India-China Relationship

    • A Cautious Thaw: Signs of easing after years of strain post-2020 Galwan clashes. The visit of Chinese Foreign Minister and the expected Modi–Xi meeting at the SCO summit reflect cautious engagement.
    • Unfinished Border Business: 
      1. Unfinished disengagement: Restrictions continue on Indian troop patrolling and herdsmen grazing in Ladakh buffer zones.
      2. De-escalation talks: Both sides have now agreed to discuss principles and modalities of de-escalation, but with little progress so far.
      3. Historical baggage: From the 1962 war to Doklam and Galwan, border issues repeatedly resurface as the defining irritant.
    • Persistent Trust Deficit: India remains wary of China’s military links with Pakistan, dam projects on the Brahmaputra, and use of economic dependencies such as rare-earths and critical technologies as leverage.

    China–Pakistan Axis and India’s Security Concerns

    1. Operation Sindoor 2025: China provided Pakistan with real-time ISR, command-and-control integration, and advanced weaponry.
    2. Extended theatre: While not directly engaging militarily, China’s operational support widened the conflict spectrum.
    3. Strategic consequences: India now faces a two-front dynamic made more acute by China’s active involvement.

    Trade Dependence Shaping Geopolitical Weakness

    1. Weaponisation of dependencies: China has denied India supplies of rare-earth magnets, fertilisers, tunnel-boring machines.
    2. Industrial impact: Foxconn withdrew hundreds of Chinese technicians under pressure from Beijing.
    3. Hydropower concerns: A massive dam, thrice the size of Three Gorges, threatens India’s lower riparian interests.

    Can tactical outreach substitute for structural resolution?

    1. Wang Yi’s visit: Led to a 10-point understanding including resumption of flights, border trade, and talks on border issues.
    2. Tactical gestures: China seeks to ease tensions but has not offered substantive concessions on India’s concerns.
    3. India’s position: PM Modi emphasised the need for “stable, predictable and constructive” relations, but only grounded in realism.

    Why outright conflict remains unlikely

    1. Geographical constraints: The Himalayas pose immense logistical challenges for a sustained full-scale war.
    2. China’s strategic calculus: Since 1979, Beijing has avoided wars to focus on economic growth.
    3. Cost of conflict: War with India risks derailing China’s “great power” ambitions vis-à-vis the US.

    The limits of aligning with China against the US

    1. US factor: Trump’s inconsistent China policy has unsettled India’s geopolitical calculations.
    2. Chinese spin: Beijing portrayed India as siding with it against “unilateral bullying” (implicitly the US).
    3. MEA clarification: India reaffirmed no change in its One-China policy stance, signalling caution.

    Way Forward

    1. Strengthen Border Posture: Accelerate infrastructure and surveillance along LAC to counter tactical surprises.
    2. Diversify Dependencies: Invest in domestic capacity for critical minerals, semiconductors, and rare earths.
    3. Engage but Verify: Continue talks on de-escalation and economic ties, but measure outcomes, not promises.
    4. Diplomatic Balancing: Maintain strategic autonomy while leveraging QUAD, SCO, BRICS without being trapped in binaries.
    5. Water Security Mechanisms: Push for institutionalised basin-sharing frameworks on Brahmaputra with multilateral backing.

    Conclusion

    The India-China relationship sits at a crossroads. While tactical outreach such as Wang Yi’s visit creates openings for engagement, the structural drivers of mistrust remain too deep for a true reset. India cannot overlook the challenges of border tensions, economic weaponisation, and China-Pakistan collusion. At the same time, the high costs of conflict and shared economic interests provide space for pragmatic management. The way forward lies in carefully calibrated diplomacy, neither falling into the trap of confrontation nor harbouring illusions of a reset.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2017] ‘China is using its economic relations and positive trade surplus as a tool to develop potential military power status in Asia’, In the light of this statement, discuss its impact on India as her neighbour.

    Linkage: China’s growing economic leverage over Pakistan, seen in CPEC and debt dependence, is increasingly shaping a strategic-military partnership. This aligns with the UPSC 2017 theme of economic tools being converted into hard power. For India, this intensifies security challenges on both borders and limits regional strategic space.

    Mapping microthemes

    1. GS Paper II (IR): India-China relations, India-US-China triangle, border disputes, strategic autonomy.
    2. GS Paper III (Security): Two-front challenge, defence preparedness, technology denial regimes.
    3. GS Paper IV (Ethics): Diplomacy, realpolitik vs idealism in foreign policy.

  • Xinjiang-Xizang Railway Line

    Why in the News?

    China has launched the Xinjiang–Xizang Railway Line, a strategic, economic, and engineering milestone, connecting Xinjiang with Tibet.

    Xinjiang-Xizang Railway Line

    About the Xinjiang–Xizang Railway Line:

    • Overview: A major high-altitude railway project connecting Hotan in Xinjiang to Shigatse and Lhasa in Tibet (Xizang).
    • Total length planned: ~2,000 km, part of China’s larger 5,000 km rail grid in Tibet by 2035.
    • Construction is phased:
      • Shigatse–Pakhuktso section (by 2025)
      • Pakhuktso–Hotan section (by 2035).
    • Terrain: Himalayas, Karakoram, Kunlun ranges, deserts, glaciers, and permafrost — average altitude above 4,500m.
    • Significance: Seen as one of China’s most advanced and difficult transport projects, comparable to the Qinghai–Tibet Railway (2006).

    Strategic Implications of the Project:

    • Military Mobility: Proximity to Aksai Chin and Line of Actual Control (LAC) enhances Chinese troop deployment and logistics capabilities.
    • Regional Integration: Links Xinjiang (Uyghur region) and Tibet (Buddhist region) with mainland China, supporting Sinicisation and demographic shifts.
    • Economic Role: Opens remote high-altitude areas to trade, energy transport, and tourism, reducing isolation of minority regions.
    • Political Control: Strengthens Beijing’s hold over restive border provinces and suppresses separatist tendencies.
    • India Factor: Raises security concerns as India is also upgrading border infrastructure post-2020 Galwan clash.
    • Part of “Go West Strategy” (2000): Long-term plan to develop western provinces with infrastructure and integrate them into China’s national economy.
    [UPSC 2023] With reference to India’s projects on connectivity, consider the following statements :

    1. East-West Corridor under Golden Quadrilateral Project connects Dibrugarh and Surat.

    2. Trilateral Highway connects Moreh in Manipur and Chiang Mai in Thailand via Myanmar.

    3. Bangladesh-China -India -Myanmar Economic Corridor connects Varanasi in Uttar Pradesh with Kunming in China. How many of the above statements are correct?

    Options: (a) Only one (b) Only two (c) All three (d) None*

     

  • In news: International Criminal Court (ICC) 

    Why in the News?

    The Trump administration sanctioned judges and prosecutors of the International Criminal Court (ICC) over arrest cases involving Israeli leaders and past probes into U.S. officials.

    About the International Criminal Court (ICC):

    • Established: 2002 under the Rome Statute (1998); headquartered at The Hague, Netherlands.
    • Nature: First permanent international court to try individuals for grave crimes.
    • Jurisdiction over 4 core crimes:
      1. Genocide
      2. Crimes against humanity
      3. War crimes
      4. Crime of aggression
    • Members: 124 States Parties
      • NON-members: India, China, USA, Russia, Israel, Ukraine
    • Structure:
      • Office of the Prosecutor – investigates and prosecutes cases.
      • 18 Judges – elected for 9 years.
      • Assembly of States Parties – governs ICC administration.
      • Trust Fund for Victims, Detention Centre
    • Languages: English, French, Arabic, Chinese, Russian, Spanish
    • Funding: Annual budget (2025) ~ €195 million (mostly from member states)

    Jurisdiction and Reach of an ICC Warrant:

    • Applicability:
      • Crimes by nationals of member states
      • Crimes committed on member state territory
      • UNSC referrals can extend jurisdiction to non-member states (e.g., Libya, Darfur)
    • Obligations on States:
      • Member states must execute arrest warrants and cooperate fully.
      • Non-compliance can be reported to Assembly of States Parties or UN Security Council (for UNSC referrals)
    • Challenges:
      • ICC lacks an independent enforcement mechanism
      • Non-members (e.g., US, Russia) are not bound to cooperate
      • Political and diplomatic constraints hinder the execution of warrants
    • Special Mechanisms: ICC established an Arrest Working Group (2016) to enhance warrant enforcement through better intelligence-sharing.
    [UPSC 2022] Which one of the following statements best reflects the issue with Senkaku Islands, sometimes mentioned in the news ?

    Options:

    (a) It is generally believed that they are artificial islands made by a country around South China Sea.

    (b) China and Japan engage in maritime disputes over these islands in East China Sea. *

    (c) A permanent American military base has been set up there to help Taiwan to increase its defence capabilities.

    (d) Though International Court of Justice declared them as no man’s land, some South-East Asian countries claim them.

     

  • Russia’s Sale of Alaska to US

    Why in the News?

    United States President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin are set to meet in Anchorage, Alaska to discuss how to end the war in Ukraine.

    Russia's Sale of Alaska to US

    About Alaska:

    • Acquisition: Largest U.S. state; Purchased from Russia in 1867 for $7.2 million.
    • Mountains: Includes Alaska Range with Mount Denali (20,310 ft), the highest peak in North America.
    • Geography: Brooks Range separates central Alaska from the Arctic far north.
    • Tundra: Northern regions feature vast tundra, permafrost, and Arctic coastal plains.
    • Glaciers: Hosts 100,000+ glaciers, including Bering Glacier, the largest in North America.
    • Forests: About 5% glacier ice, with extensive boreal and temperate rainforests in the south.
    • Volcanoes: More than 70 active volcanoes in Aleutians and Alaska Peninsula.
    • Seismic Activity: Located on the circum-Pacific seismic belt, prone to powerful quakes (e.g., 1964 Alaska earthquake).
    • Water Resources: Contains 3 million+ lakes and 3,000+ rivers, among the most water-rich regions globally.
    • Peninsulas: Includes Alaska Peninsula, Kenai Peninsula, and Seward Peninsula (linked to ancient Bering land bridge).

    Why did Russia sell Alaska to the US?

    • After the Crimean War (1853–56), Russia was financially strained and needed funds.
    • Alaska was seen as a remote, unprofitable liability with declining fur trade.
    • Russia feared Britain might seize Alaska easily from nearby Canada in a future war.
    • Selling it to the United States ensured goodwill and balanced British power.
    • The $7.2 million sale (1867) turned a weakly defended outpost into cash for reforms.

    Geopolitical Significance of Alaska:

    • Natural Resources: Rich in oil, gas (e.g., Prudhoe Bay discovery, 1968), fisheries, and minerals vital for U.S. energy security.
    • Shipping Routes: Offers access to Arctic Sea routes, increasingly navigable due to climate change.
    • Strategic Gateway: Provides access to the Arctic and Pacific, enhancing U.S. naval and air capabilities.
    • Defense Value: Proximity to Russia made it critical in the Cold War and remains vital in Arctic competition.
    • Military Presence: Hosts major U.S. bases and radar systems for missile defense and surveillance.
    • Arctic Council Role: Strengthens U.S. claims in polar governance and Arctic Council negotiations.
    • Scientific Hub: Serves as a center for climate, seismic, and polar ecosystem research.
    [UPSC 2025] Consider the following statements:

    I. Anadyr in Siberia and Nome in Alaska are a few kilometers from each other, but when people are waking up and getting set for breakfast in these cities, it would be different days.

    II. When it is Monday in Anadyr, it is Tuesday in Nome.

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    (a) I only * (b) II only (c) Both I and II (d) Neither I nor II

     

  • Africa is challenging China’s mining hegemony

    For two decades, China has led Africa’s mining sector, securing vast stakes in cobalt, lithium, copper, and iron ore. Now, African governments and civil society are challenging opaque contracts, environmental damage, and lack of value addition. The old “raw resources for infrastructure” model is giving way to demands for local processing, transparency, and economic sovereignty.

    Significance

    For the first time in decades, China’s unchallenged hold on African mining is weakening. Nations like the DRC, Namibia, and Zimbabwe are renegotiating deals, banning raw mineral exports, and holding Chinese firms accountable for environmental and labour violations. The scale is significant, in 2024 alone, DRC lost $132 million due to tax exemptions for Chinese companies. These actions could reshape global cobalt and lithium supply chains essential for the green economy.

    China’s Long-standing Dominance in Africa’s Mining

    1. Control over critical minerals: DRC produces 80% of the world’s cobalt; China controls ~80% of that output via deals like Sicomines.
    2. Infrastructure-for-resources model: Chinese firms exchanged infrastructure for mining rights, but local benefits have been minimal.

    Drivers of the Pushback Against Chinese Projects

    1. Civil society pressure: Groups like Congo Is Not for Sale exposed $132 million revenue loss in 2024.
    2. Market-linked risks: Contracts tied to commodity prices risk leaving nations with no investment in downturns.
    3. Government renegotiations: DRC raising stake in joint venture with Sinohydro & China Railway Group from 32% to 70%.

    African Nations Taking Assertive Measures

    1. DRC: Cancelled Chemaf Resources’ sale to China’s Norin Mining after state miner Gecamines’ opposition.
    2. Namibia: Alleged $50 million bribe by Xinfeng Investments; failure to build promised processing facilities.
    3. Zimbabwe: $300 million Huayou Cobalt lithium plant; benefits may flow back to China without safeguards.

    Environmental and Social Concerns from Chinese Mining

    1. Pollution incidents: Acid spill in Zambia contaminated the Kafue River.
    2. Biodiversity protection: Hwange National Park coal permit blocked for ecological reasons.
    3. Community and heritage impacts: Cameroon’s Lobé-Kribi Iron Ore Project opposed by NGOs over health and cultural threats.

    Policy Shifts for Economic Sovereignty

    1. Export bans: Zimbabwe (2022) and Namibia (2023) banned unprocessed lithium exports to promote local beneficiation.
    2. Retention of value: Policy aims to strengthen domestic processing, but risk of elite capture remains without broader reforms.

    Conclusion

    China remains Africa’s largest mining partner, but African nations are increasingly asserting control through renegotiations, environmental enforcement, and value addition. If sustained, these actions could reposition Africa from a raw material supplier to an active player in global green economy supply chains.

    Value Addition

    China’s Role in Mining in Africa (2000–2024)

    Scale of Presence

    1. Largest external mining partner: Operates in over 15 African countries.
    2. Dominance in cobalt & lithium: Controls ~80% of DRC’s cobalt output; major stakes in lithium mines in Zimbabwe, Namibia.

    Investment Model

    1. Infrastructure-for-resources deals: e.g., Sicomines agreement in DRC (mining rights in exchange for roads, hospitals, railways).
    2. High-value acquisitions: Purchase of mining stakes from global and local firms to secure long-term supply chains.

    Strategic Objectives

    1. Securing supply for EV & battery industries: Critical minerals channelled to Chinese manufacturing hubs.
    2. Vertical integration: Ownership from extraction to processing facilities (mostly located in China).

    Criticism & Concerns

    1. Limited local benefits: Minimal skills transfer, inadequate job creation.
    2. Environmental damage: Incidents like Zambia’s Kafue River acid spill.
    3. Opaque contracts: Alleged bribery (Namibia) and lack of transparency in revenue flows.

    Shifts & Resistance

    1. Renegotiations and policy pushback: DRC increasing state stake in ventures; export bans in Zimbabwe and Namibia.
    2. Civil society pressure: Activist coalitions exposing revenue losses and demanding fairer contracts.

    Critical Minerals Geopolitics

    1. Strategic importance: Minerals like cobalt, lithium, and copper are essential for EV batteries, renewable energy storage, and electronics manufacturing.
    2. Global competition: Control over their supply chains influences technological dominance in the clean energy transition.
    3. China’s leverage: By securing ~80% of DRC’s cobalt and significant lithium reserves, China holds a strategic advantage over rivals such as the US, EU, and Japan.
    4. UPSC linkage – Relevant for GS II (International Relations) and GS III (Economy, Technology), particularly in questions on energy security and global trade politics.

    Resource Nationalism

    1. Definition: A policy stance where nations assert control over natural resources to maximise domestic benefit and reduce foreign dependency.
    2. African examples: Zimbabwe and Namibia banning export of unprocessed lithium; DRC renegotiating mining contracts to increase state ownership.
    3. Implications: Can boost domestic processing industries but may deter foreign investment if not paired with stable policy frameworks.

    Mapping Micro Themes

    GS Paper Theme/Topic Micro Theme Example
    GS Paper II International Relations South-South cooperation & friction China-Africa mining ties
    GS Paper II Governance Resource nationalism DRC renegotiation of Sicomines
    GS Paper III Environment Ecological threats from mining Hwange NP permit denial, Kafue River spill

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2021] “The USA is facing an existential threat in the form of China, that is much more challenging than the erstwhile Soviet Union.” Explain

    Linkage: While the question is US–China centric, Africa’s mining sector is a key arena of US–China competition. China’s dominance over Africa’s critical minerals gives it strategic leverage in global supply chains, posing long-term geopolitical and economic challenges to the US, a dimension comparable to Cold War-era resource and influence battles.

    Practice Mains Question

    Examine how Africa’s policy shift in mineral governance could alter global supply chains for critical minerals.

  • UNDP Equator Initiative Prize, 2025

    Why in the News?

    A women farmers’ collective from Karnataka has been recognised among the ten global winners of the United Nations Development Programme’s (UNDP) Equator Prize 2025.

    About UNDP Equator Initiative Award:

    • Overview: Presented under the Equator Initiative of the UNDP.
    • Awarded biennially:  To community-led initiatives reducing poverty through biodiversity conservation and sustainable use.
    • Significance: Often called the “Nobel Prize for Biodiversity Conservation”.
    • Award: Includes a cash prize of $10,000.
    • Eligibility:
      • Initiative must have existed for at least three years.
      • Must be a community-based group in a rural area of a UNDP-supported country, or an Indigenous Peoples’ community in a rural area.
      • Actions must be nature-based and benefit two or more SDGs.

    Back2Basics: United Nations Development Programme (UNDP):

    • Established: 1966 by the UN General Assembly; Headquarters: New York, USA.
    • Mission: End poverty, promote democratic governance, rule of law, and inclusive institutions.
    • Focus Areas:
      • Sustainable development.
      • Democratic governance and peacebuilding.
      • Climate and disaster resilience.
    • Funding: Entirely from voluntary contributions of member states.
    • Role: Advocates for change, connects countries to knowledge, resources, and expertise for sustainable human development.
    • Key initiatives:
      • Human Development Index (HDI).
      • Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) Reports.
      • Gender Inequality Index (GII).
    [UPSC 2012] The Multi-dimensional Poverty Index developed by Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative with UNDP support covers which of the following?

    1. Deprivation of education, health, assets and services at household level

    2. Purchasing power parity at national level

    3. Extent of budget deficit and GDP growth rate at national level

    Options: (a) 1 only * (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 1 and 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3

     

  • Third United Nations Conference on Landlocked Developing Countries (LLDC3)

    Why in the News?

    The 3rd UN Conference on Landlocked Developing Countries (LLDC3) in Awaza, Turkmenistan, adopted the Awaza Declaration to boost investment, address challenges, and promote sustainable growth in 32 landlocked nations.

    Third United Nations Conference on Landlocked Developing Countries (LLDC3)

    About Landlocked Developing Countries (LLDCs):

    • Overview: 32 UN-recognized countries with no direct access to the sea, collectively home to over 600 million people.
    • List of LLDCs:
      1. Africa: Botswana, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Central African Republic, Chad, Eswatini, Ethiopia, Lesotho, Malawi, Mali, Niger, Rwanda, South Sudan, Uganda, Zambia, Zimbabwe.
      2. Asia: Afghanistan, Bhutan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Mongolia, Nepal, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan.
      3. Europe: Armenia, Azerbaijan, North Macedonia, Moldova, Serbia.
      4. South America: Bolivia, Paraguay.
    • Challenges:
      • Dependence on transit countries for global market access.
      • Higher trade and transport costs (often twice those of coastal countries).
      • Limited connectivity, slower growth, and vulnerability to climate impacts.
    • Past Conferences:
      • 2003 (Almaty) – Almaty Programme of Action.
      • 2014 (Vienna) – Vienna Programme of Action (2014–2024).
      • 2025 (Awaza) – Awaza Programme of Action (2024–2034).

    Structure and Functioning:

    • LLDC Conferences: Held every 10 years to review progress and set a new action framework.
    • Awaza Programme of Action (2024–2034) – Priority Areas:
      • Structural transformation, science, technology, and innovation.
      • Trade facilitation and regional integration.
      • Transit, transport, and connectivity.
      • Climate resilience and adaptation.
      • Monitoring and implementation.
    • Stakeholder Participation:
      • UN member states, transit countries, donor agencies, NGOs, private sector, and academia.
    • Mechanisms:
      • UN-wide monitoring framework covering 323 initiatives.
      • Partnerships for infrastructure and digital connectivity.
      • Climate Negotiating Group under UNFCCC for LLDC-specific challenges.
    [UPSC 2013] Which one of the following countries is landlocked?

    Options:  (a) Bolivia* (b) Peru (c) Suriname (d) Uruguay

     

  • Gaza War Impact on IMEC

    Why in the News?

    India’s National Security Council Secretariat recently hosted envoys from the US, UAE, Saudi Arabia, France, Italy, Germany, Israel, Jordan, and the EU to review progress on the India–Middle East–Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC).

    Gaza War Impact on IMEC

    About IMEC Project:

    • Part of the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGII) for developing connectivity in emerging regions.
    • MoU signed on 10 September 2023 at the G20 New Delhi Summit.
    • Members: India, US, UAE, Saudi Arabia, France, Germany, Italy, European Union.
    • Aim: Integrate Asia, Middle East, and Europe to boost transport efficiency, reduce costs, create jobs, cut greenhouse gas emissions, and strengthen economic unity.
    • Structure:
      • East Corridor: India to Arabian Gulf.
      • Northern Corridor: Gulf region to Europe.
    • Key Ports:
      • India – Mundra, Kandla, Jawaharlal Nehru Port (Mumbai).
      • Middle East – Fujairah, Jebel Ali, Abu Dhabi, Dammam, Ras Al Khair.
      • Israel – Haifa.
      • Europe – Piraeus, Messina, Marseille.
    • Infrastructure includes: Railway links, ship-to-rail hubs, roads, electricity cables, hydrogen pipelines, and high-speed data cables.

    Impact of Gaza War:

    • Derailed work: Conflict from late 2023 halted stakeholder meetings and derailed western leg (Middle East–Europe) progress.
    • Jordan–Israel relations at historic low; Saudi–Israel normalisation stalled.
    • Regional rivalries (e.g., Saudi–UAE trade competition) hinder unified operational planning.

    Significance:

    • Economic: EU is India’s largest trading partner; corridor promises faster, cheaper trade with reduced emissions.
    • Strategic: Strengthens India’s role in West Asia and positions it as a connector between Europe and the Middle East.
    • Energy & Technology: Potential for clean hydrogen pipelines, electricity and data cable links.
    • Resilience: Provides alternative to Red Sea shipping routes vulnerable to disruptions.
    [UPSC 2025] India is one of the founding members of the International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC), a multimodal transportation corridor, which will connect:

    Options: (a) India to Central Asia to Europe via Iran* (b) India to Central Asia via China (c) India to South-East Asia through Bangladesh and Myanmar (d) India to Europe through Azerbaijan

     

  • [8th August 2025] ​The Hindu Op-ed: Mending ties: On state visit of Philippines President to India

    Philippines’ President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.’s visit to India strengthened bilateral ties through a Strategic Partnership Agreement, focusing on defence cooperation, Indo-Pacific security, and future trade collaboration, while also serving broader strategic goals in ASEAN and Indo-Pacific diplomacy.

    Key Highlights of the Visit:

    1. Strategic Partnership Agreement: The Philippines becomes only the fifth country (after Japan, Vietnam, Australia, and South Korea) with which India has signed such an agreement.
    2. Maritime and Defence Cooperation: The Indian Navy held its first joint maritime exercise with the Philippine Navy in the South China Sea. India reaffirmed its support for the 2016 UNCLOS Arbitration Award favouring the Philippines in its dispute with China. Discussions were held to expand defence exports, especially BrahMos missiles and other Indian military hardware. New agreements include exchanges between all three services and Coast Guards.
    3. Connectivity and People-to-People Ties: Both countries agreed to begin direct flights and ease visa restrictions to facilitate travel and business.
    4. Economic and Trade Dimensions:
      • Bilateral trade remains modest at $3.3 billion (2024-25).
      • Investments are growing in technology and pharmaceuticals.
      • Talks to launch a Preferential Trade Agreement (PTA) have been initiated.
      • India’s decision to revise the ASEAN-India Trade in Goods Agreement (AITIGA) reflects renewed trade diplomacy.

    India’s Broader Indo-Pacific Strategy:

    1. Indo-Pacific strategy beyond the spectrum of Quad: India’s engagement with the Philippines shows its intention to look beyond the Quad (India, USA, Japan, Australia) in Indo-Pacific diplomacy. India is pushing for multipolar partnerships, focused on maritime security, trade resilience, and a rules-based international order.
    2. ASEAN & Indo-Pacific Messaging: The Philippines is the incoming chair for ASEAN in 2026 and the coordinator for the ASEAN-India comprehensive strategic partnership. This gives India a crucial partner to enhance its engagement with the bloc.

    Dimensions of India-Philippines Relations

    Historical and Cultural Links:

    • Diplomatic relations were formally established on November 26, 1949, soon after both nations gained independence.
    • Historical ties and shared civilizational links, though not fully documented, point to a long-standing connection.
    • A Treaty of Friendship was signed in 1952.
    • India’s “Look East Policy” (1992) and subsequent “Act East Policy” (2014) have been instrumental in revitalizing and intensifying the relationship.
    • 2019: BrahMos missile deal initiated, the Philippines becomes the first foreign buyer

    Common Issues and Contemporary Challenges:

    • South China Sea Dispute: Both countries face challenges from China’s expansive territorial claims and assertive actions. India supports international law and a rules-based order, which aligns with the Philippines’ interests.
    • Terrorism and Maritime Security: Both nations are susceptible to terrorism and face non-traditional security threats, making cooperation in these areas crucial.
    • Economic Liberalization and Trade: Navigating the complexities of global trade, especially in the face of protectionist policies from major powers like the U.S., is a common challenge that both countries are addressing through initiatives like the potential PTA.

    The recent meeting has elevated India-Philippines ties to a new level, rooted in mutual concerns over regional security, strategic autonomy, and economic cooperation. As ASEAN dynamics evolve and geopolitical tensions rise, such partnerships provide stability and avenues for cooperation in the Indo-Pacific. India’s outreach to the Philippines affirms its commitment to an inclusive regional order and diversified diplomacy.

    Mains Practice Question:

    1. The recent elevation of India-Philippines relations to a Strategic Partnership is part of India’s larger Indo-Pacific vision. Discuss the significance of this development in the context of ASEAN, regional security, and India’s Act East Policy.

  • [7th August 2025] The Hindu Op-ed: Decoding China, the lessons for a vulnerable India

    Recent actions by China, such as the withdrawal of engineers from India, are not isolated events but a deliberate geo-economic manoeuvre. This strategy is driven by China’s apprehension of a rising India and its ambition to maintain a ‘unipolar Asia’. 

    Recent Actions Undertaken by China against India’s interest:

    1. Recalling over 300 Chinese engineers from iPhone manufacturing facilities in India.
    2. Restricting exports of rare earths and critical minerals to India.
    3. Informal trade restrictions on the export of capital equipment including high-end manufacturing equipment for electronics assembly heavy-duty boring machines and solar equipment to India.

    China’s Geo-economic Manoeuvre against India:

    “It is a meticulously calibrated stratagem, designed to arrest India’s burgeoning manufacturing ambitions.”

    • Impending Technology Transfer: The withdrawal of the Chinese engineers reflects China’s calculated move to Disrupt technology transfer and Stall India’s capacity-building in advanced electronics manufacturing. By pulling out talent, it ensures that ‘India’s learning curve in high-precision, high-efficiency manufacturing remains steep.’
    • Subtle yet potent strategy: As India positions itself in global supply chains through initiatives like Production Linked Incentive (PLI) schemes, any delay in technology adoption weakens India’s global competitiveness.
    • Weaponization of Supply Chains: By restricting exports of rare earths, critical minerals, and high-end manufacturing equipment, China leverages its control over global supply chains to disrupt India’s industrial ambitions. These informal trade restrictions are non-transparent and hence are hard to contest, create uncertainty and increase costs.
    • Weaponising Overcapacity: Price War as Strategy: China’s industrial overproduction is used deliberately to crash prices and drive out competition. BYD in electric vehicles is flooding global markets with ultra-cheap products. This makes it hard for nations like India to compete fairly, stalling local industries.

    Difference in Manufacturing Ecosystems of India and China:

    China

    India
    Systemic Industrial Dominance:

    1. Not accidental, but strategic: China’s industrial pre-eminence is not trivial, it has been built through decades of strong policies, investments, and planning.

    2. Covers critical and emerging sectors:

    Like, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Quantum computing, 6G telecommunications, Electric Vehicles (EVs)

    3. Controls global supply chains:

    China does not merely export goods, it orchestrates and controls global supply chains, from raw materials to finished products.

    4. Weaponising overcapacity: Overproduction (a sign of weakness elsewhere) is strategically used by China to lower global prices, making it hard for other countries to compete.

    5. Aggressive pricing = market capture:

    This stifles new competitors and helps China maintain dominance.

    6. Economic statecraft by China: China uses its manufacturing power as a geo-economic tool to stay ahead globally and protect its export-driven economy.

    		 Challenges Faced:

    1. Nascent Manufacturing Ecosystem:

    Compared to China, India is still in the early stages of becoming a global manufacturing power.

    2. Facing many hurdles: Poor infrastructure infrastructure lacunae)

    3. Complex government procedures (bureaucratic red tape)

    4. High import dependence: India still imports many critical components like Semiconductors, Sophisticated chips, Sensors, Engines

    5. Limited local capability:

    Even basic assembly-level manufacturing (referred to as “screwdriver technology“) depends on external help.

    6. “Make in India” needs outside support:

    While the goal is self-reliance, India is still not fully capable of producing independently, especially in high-tech sectors.

    India’s Strategic Dilemma: Even as India tries to de-risk from China by aligning with the West, it faces challenges like US tariff hikes on Indian goods and Exemptions given to China despite its pro-Russia stance. This underscores the need for true strategic autonomy building resilient internal capacities rather than over-dependence on foreign goodwill.

    Way Forward:

    Based on China’s strategy of weaponizing its supply chains, India should adopt a multi-pronged response to enhance its own strategic and economic resilience.

    1. Bolster Domestic Manufacturing: India must double down on initiatives like the Production Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme to reduce its import dependence on high-value electronics and components.
    2. Diversify Supply Chains and Sourcing: Actively seek alternative suppliers and build resilient supply chains with like-minded countries to reduce over-reliance on a single nation for critical goods. For example, India is a part of the Supply Chain Resilience Initiative (SCRI), a trilateral framework with Japan and Australia.
    3. Invest in Strategic Alliances: India should utilize multilateral platforms such as the Quad and forge bilateral partnerships to secure access to critical minerals and technologies.
    4. Boost Domestic Critical Mineral Exploration: It is essential to intensify domestic exploration and processing of critical minerals through missions like the National Critical Minerals Mission (NCMM) to achieve self-reliance.
    5. Leverage Economic Diplomacy: India should use trade agreements and international forums like the WTO to challenge informal trade restrictions and protect its emerging industries from coercive practices.

    China’s aggressive external policies are a direct result of its domestic problems, such as an aging population and economic overcapacity. This forces it to rely on exports, making any competitor like India a perceived threat. As Henry Kissinger said, “Empires have no interest in operating within an international system; they aspire to be the international system.” This highlights the need for India to build its own strategic autonomy and avoid relying on fragile alliances.

     

    Value Addition:

    Quotes by Famous Scholars that can be used in the India-China Relation Topic:

    1. “India lives in a tough neighbourhood. It needs to be wise, not merely strong.” — Shivshankar Menon

    2. “In geopolitics, economics is not just policy — it’s a weapon.” — Henry Kissinger

     

    Mains Practice Questions:

    GS2 (IR): “China’s geo-economic manoeuvres are a reflection of its internal compulsions and not just strategic rivalry.” Elucidate with reference to recent developments in India-China trade relations.

    GS3 (Economy): “India’s ambition to become a global manufacturing hub faces challenges both internal and external.” Discuss the role of strategic autonomy in achieving self-reliance in electronics and high-tech sectors.