💥Crack UPSC In 1st Attempt | Admission Open | Ultimate Assessment Program 2027/2028
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Subject: Internal Security

  • Operation Sadbhavana by Indian Army

    Operation Sadbhavana

    Introduction

    • The Indian Army has recently adopted Topa Pir village in Poonch district, Jammu and Kashmir, as a model village under Operation Sadbhavana.

    Operation Sadbhavana

    • Purpose: Operation Sadbhavana (Goodwill) is an initiative by the Indian Army in Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh to address the needs of people affected by terrorism, primarily sponsored by Pakistan.
    • Welfare Activities: The operation includes running Army Goodwill Schools, infrastructure development projects, and educational tours for children in remote areas.
    • Focus on Education: There are seven Army Goodwill Schools under Operation Sadbhavana in the Ladakh Region, aiming to improve the standard of education.
    • Objectives: The operation aims to achieve national integration, women empowerment, employment generation, and development activities towards nation-building.
    • Collaborative Approach: Projects under Operation Sadbhavana are selected considering local aspirations and in coordination with the local civil administration.

    Adoption of Topa Pir Village

    • Model Village Initiative: The Army’s adoption of Topa Pir village is a step towards creating a model village, with an emphasis on community development and welfare.
    • Recent Incidents: The village gained attention following a controversial incident involving the alleged torture of civilians by the Army, which led to the deaths of three individuals.
    • Community Relations: The incident has significantly impacted the relationship between the Army and the local Gujjar and Bakarwal communities, who predominantly inhabit areas near the Line of Control (LoC).

  • The delusion of eliminating ‘the last terrorist’

    Battalion approach is not best of counter-terrorism strategies

    Central Idea:

    The article, written by Shashank Ranjan, a retired Indian Army officer and current faculty member at O.P. Jindal Global University, critiques the counter-terrorism approach in Jammu and Kashmir, emphasizing the need to reevaluate the obsession with the number of terrorists killed. It highlights the historical context of insurgency in the Rajouri-Poonch region and argues that a singular focus on ‘kills’ may be counterproductive in achieving long-term stability.

    Key Highlights:

    • The new year in Jammu and Kashmir began with a terror strike in Rajouri-Poonch, leading to a renewed focus on the number of terrorists killed by security forces.
    • The article questions the efficacy of the current counter-terrorism approach, suggesting that an obsession with numbers may not align with the changing dynamics of insurgency in the region.
    • Ranjan draws attention to the historical success in curbing insurgency in Rajouri-Poonch by addressing the root causes, and how the focus on ‘kills’ might be contributing to the re-emergence of instability.

    Key Challenges:

    • The article highlights the challenges posed by a system that is reluctant to adapt to changing dynamics and continues to prioritize short-term gains and competitive career environments over long-term stability.
    • The gap between the tactical-level operations and people-centric approaches is emphasized, pointing out the lapses that have led to civilian casualties and operational rush for ‘kills.’
    • The reluctance of political initiatives in Jammu and Kashmir is mentioned as a challenge, hindering a comprehensive resolution through a whole-of-government approach.

    Key Terms:

    • Counter-terrorism: Measures and strategies to combat terrorism and insurgencies.
    • People-centric: Approaches and operations that prioritize the well-being and acceptance of the local population.
    • Whole-of-Government Approach: An integrated approach involving all government agencies to address complex issues.

    Key Phrases:

    • “Debatable obsession with the numbers of terrorists killed.”
    • “Misplaced focus of the counter-terrorism approach.”
    • “Tail wagging the dog” – Pursuing goals without regard to the means.

    Key Quotes:

    • “In our undue obsession with the numbers of ‘kills’, we may have been winning the battle by addressing the symptoms, but it has indeed been at the cost of the campaign.”
    • “Chasing numbers was the obvious option in the years when terror-related fatalities in J&K touched a yearly mark of 2,000-plus.”

    Key Statements:

    • “The situational dynamics, unfortunately, never ushered in adjustments in the modus operandi of security forces and assessment methodology of unit performance by the hierarchy.”
    • “Leadership is all about compensating any cost to the soldier, with the leader standing up to bridge the gap between the interests of people and soldiers.”

    Key Examples and References:

    • Refers to the historical success in curbing insurgency in Rajouri-Poonch by addressing root causes.
    • Mentions the unfortunate death of three civilians in Dera ki Gali as a consequence of lapses in people-centric policies.

    Key Facts and Data:

    • Reports declining terror-related fatalities in Jammu and Kashmir, contrasting figures at 134 in 2023 with over 2,000 in earlier years.
    • Highlights the absence of Assembly representation in J&K since 2018.

    Critical Analysis:

    The article critically analyzes the counter-terrorism approach, pointing out the flaws in focusing solely on the number of terrorists killed. It underlines the need for adaptation to changing dynamics, a people-centric approach, and a shift from short-term gains to long-term stability.

    Way Forward:

    • Urges a reevaluation of the current counter-terrorism strategy to align with the evolving dynamics of insurgency.
    • Emphasizes the importance of a people-centric approach and addressing the root causes of conflict.
    • Calls for political initiatives and a whole-of-government approach to achieving comprehensive and lasting stability in Jammu and Kashmir.

  • Akash Missile System: India’s Iron Dome

    akash missile

    Central Idea

    • India demonstrated the firepower of its Akash surface-to-air (SAM) weapon system, where a single firing unit simultaneously engaged and destroyed four unmanned targets during the recent Exercise Astrashakti 2023.
    • Countries like Armenia, Brazil, and Egypt have shown interest in acquiring the Akash SAM.

    About Akash Missile System

    Details
    Development and Production Developed by the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), produced by Bharat Dynamics Ltd (BDL).
    Type Short-range Surface-to-Air Missile (SAM).
    Engagement Capacity Engages four aerial targets simultaneously at a range of 25 km from a single firing unit.
    Target Engagement Capable of targeting multiple threats concurrently in group or autonomous modes.
    Electronic Counter-Counter Measures (ECCM) Equipped to counter enemy jamming and evasion tactics.
    Mobility and Agility Configured on mobile platforms for rapid deployment and relocation.
    Operational Use In service with the Indian Army and the Indian Air Force (IAF).
    Range and Altitude Effective range of 4.5 km to 25 km, with an altitude range of 100 meters to 20 km.
    Physical Dimensions Length: 5,870 mm; Diameter: 350 mm; Weight: 710 kg.
    Automation and Response Fully automated with quick response from target detection to neutralization.
    System Architecture Open-system architecture for adaptability to current and future air defense environments.

    Comparison with Israel’s Iron Dome

    • Interception Capabilities: Akash is often compared to Israel’s Iron Dome due to its ability to intercept UAVs, smaller projectiles, helicopters, and aircraft.
    • Defensive Role: While similar to the Iron Dome, Akash is primarily designed for defense against larger aerial threats like aircraft, rather than small rockets.

  • Chameleon Trojan: Compromising Biometric Security on Android Devices

    Chameleon Trojan

    Central Idea

    • Security researchers have identified an updated version of the ‘Chameleon Trojan’ malware, capable of disabling biometric authentication methods.

    Chameleon Trojan

    • The malware’s primary objective is to steal the phone’s PIN by bypassing fingerprint and face unlock security features.
    • This trojan attaches itself to legitimate Android applications, such as Google Chrome, to evade detection.
    • It operates in the background and is reportedly undetectable during runtime, bypassing Google Protect alerts and other security software.
    • It exploits the Accessibility service on Android 12 and earlier versions, while on newer versions, it circumvents Google’s security restrictions through different methods.

    Modus Operandi of Chameleon Trojan

    • To bypass new restrictions, the malware displays an HTML page instructing users to enable the Accessibility service for the app, compromising device security.
    • Once active, it captures on-screen content, navigates using gestures, and steals PINs and passwords, subsequently accessing more sensitive data like credit card details and login credentials.
    • The malware also tracks app usage habits to time its attacks when the device is least likely to be in use.

    Protection against Chameleon Trojan

    • Users are advised to avoid installing Android apps from unofficial sources to reduce the risk of malware infection.
    • Be wary of enabling the Accessibility service for apps that are not well-known or trusted.
    • Conducting regular security scans on the device can help in identifying and mitigating threats.
    • Ensuring that Google Play Protect is enabled at all times is recommended for continuous monitoring and protection against malware.

  • We want a Digital India. Just not the one we are living in

    Dark Web Investigations: Risk Academy Certification to check - Indiaforensic

    Central idea 

    The increasing frequency of data breaches in India, exemplified by the recent dark web sale of sensitive personal information of 815 million citizens, underscores a pressing cybersecurity challenge. India’s inadequate incident response strategies, lack of transparency, and failure to prioritize cybersecurity pose risks to individuals and national security. A comprehensive approach, focusing on prevention, detection, and transparency, is imperative for building a resilient and secure digital infrastructure in India.

    Key Highlights:

    • Resecurity, a US company, revealed the sale of sensitive personal data of around 815 million Indians on the dark web.
    • The data included Aadhaar numbers, passport information, and addresses, posing a significant threat to individuals.
    • Previous instances of data leaks in India, such as the CoWin website breach and AIIMS ransomware attack, highlight a recurring issue.

    Key Challenges:

    • India faces a rising trend of data breaches, with the potential for severe consequences like identity theft and financial scams.
    • Lack of effective incident response strategies in India compared to countries like the US, where cybersecurity standards are being strengthened.

    Key Terms:

    • Dark web, Aadhaar, Passport number, Ransomware, Cybersecurity, Data breach, Incident response.

    Key Phrases:

    • “Leaking of sensitive information poses a severe threat to individuals’ financial well-being.”
    • “India’s mobile phone usage, enhanced banking access, and growing market size make it an attractive target for bad actors.”

    Key Quotes:

    • “The constant flow of news about data breaches is normalizing massive losses of personal data.”
    • “India’s response to data breaches is criticized for its lack of transparency, accountability, and effective incident response.”

    Key Statements:

    • “Data breaches are at an all-time high globally, and India is particularly vulnerable due to its economic growth and large population.”
    • “Incident response strategies in India are characterized by denials and lack of transparent communication with affected citizens.”

    Key Examples and References:

    • Resecurity’s revelation of the sale of Indians’ personal data on the dark web.
    • Previous data breaches in India, including the CoWin website leak and the AIIMS ransomware attack.

    Key Facts:

    • The data set on the dark web contained personally identifiable information of approximately 815 million Indian citizens.
    • India lacks a long-term cybersecurity strategy, leading to inadequate handling of data breaches.

    Key Data:

    • The sensitive personal data of 815 million Indians was available on the dark web for a price of $80,000.

    Critical Analysis:

    • India’s response to data breaches is criticized for its lack of transparency, accountability, and effective incident response.
    • The Data Protection Act in India is deemed insufficient, especially in addressing sensitive health information.

    Way Forward:

    • Prioritize the prevention, detection, assessment, and remediation of cyber incidents in India.
    • Establish a cybersecurity board with government and private sector participation for concrete recommendations.
    • Adopt a zero-trust architecture and mandate a standardized playbook for responding to cybersecurity vulnerabilities.
    • Inform and empower citizens immediately, taking responsibility for their protection and remediation in the aftermath of cyber incidents.

  • Kashmiri political outfit declared unlawful under UAPA

    Central Idea

    • The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has declared the Muslim League Jammu Kashmir faction as an “unlawful association” under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) for five years.
    • It is a very rare occasion that any election-contesting political party has been banned under UAPA.

    Government’s Stance

    • The Union Home Minister emphasized that the organization and its members are involved in anti-national and secessionist activities, supporting terrorism, and inciting people to establish Islamic rule in Jammu and Kashmir.
    • It stated that the faction is engaged in anti-India and pro-Pakistan propaganda, aiming for Jammu and Kashmir’s secession from India, its merger with Pakistan, and the establishment of Islamic rule.

    About Understanding the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA)

    • Purpose: The UAPA aims to prevent unlawful activities and associations in India, focusing on maintaining the country’s integrity and sovereignty. Under Section 3 of the UAPA Act, the government has powers to declare an association “unlawful”.
    • Evolution: Originally passed in 1967, the UAPA has evolved from the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) and the Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA), with significant amendments in 2004 to include “terrorist act” in its scope.
    • Unlawful Activities: These include actions, whether by deeds, words, or visible representation, that work towards the cession or secession of a part of India, disrupt its sovereignty and territorial integrity, or cause disaffection against the country.
    • Unlawful Association: Under Section 3 of the UAPA Act, the government has powers to declare an association “unlawful”. An association can be deemed “unlawful” if it engages in, supports, or encourages unlawful activities, as defined under Section 2(p) of the UAPA.

    Unlawful Activities and Funding

    • Fundraising for Terrorism: The Ministry highlighted that the outfit has been raising funds through various sources, including Pakistan, to support unlawful activities and terrorism.
    • Stone-Pelting Incidents: The group’s involvement in stone-pelting against security forces was cited as a sign of disrespect towards India’s constitutional authority and setup.

    Linkages with Terrorist Organizations

    • Terror Connections: The MHA provided evidence of the faction’s connections with banned terrorist organizations and its role in supporting terrorist activities to instill terror in the country.
    • Government’s Concerns: The Central government expressed concerns that if unchecked, the faction would continue its anti-national activities, challenging India’s territorial integrity, security, and sovereignty.

    Implications of the Ban

    • UAPA Enforcement: The declaration under Section 3 (3) of the UAPA signifies a stringent approach against the group’s activities for the next five years.
    • National Security Focus: This move aligns with the government’s commitment to maintaining national security and integrity, particularly in the sensitive region of Jammu and Kashmir.

    Conclusion

    • Strong Message: The government’s decision sends a clear message against any forces acting against India’s unity, sovereignty, and integrity.
    • Continued Vigilance: The ban reflects India’s ongoing efforts to combat separatism and terrorism, ensuring peace and stability in Jammu and Kashmir and across the nation.

  • INS Imphal: Everything you need to know

    ins imphal

    Central Idea

    • INS Imphal (Pennant D68), the third ship of the Visakhapatnam class stealth-guided missile destroyers, is set to join the Indian Navy.
    • Part of Project 15B, INS Imphal follows the lineage of the Delhi and Kolkata classes of indigenous destroyers.

    About INS Imphal

    Details
    Ship Name INS Imphal (Pennant D68)
    Class Visakhapatnam class stealth-guided missile destroyer (Project 15B)
    Commissioning Date Scheduled for December 26
    Builder Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Limited (MDSL)
    Design Indian Navy’s Warship Design Bureau
    Propulsion System Combined gas and gas (COGAG) configuration with four gas turbines
    Maximum Speed 30 knots
    Range 4000 nautical miles
    Armament BrahMos surface-to-surface cruise missiles

    Barak-8 surface-to-air missiles

    127 mm main gun

    AK-630 30mm guns

    Torpedo launchers and anti-submarine rocket launchers
    Helicopter Facilities Can operate two multi-role helicopters (Sea King or HAL Dhruv)
    Strategic Features Stealth capabilities for reduced radar signature

    Advanced combat management system

    Total atmospheric control system (TACS) for protection against nuclear, biological, and chemical threats
    Significance Represents advanced naval warfare capabilities and strategic asset for the Indian Navy
    Tribute to Northeast India Named after the city of Imphal, honoring the strategic and historical significance of the Northeast region

  • SAMAR Air Defence System

    samar

    Central Idea

    • In a major success for its in-house design and development efforts, the Indian Air Force has successfully testfired its SAMAR air defence missile system.

    About SAMAR Air Defence System

    Details
    Full Name Surface to Air Missile for Assured Retaliation (SAMAR)
    Type Short-range air-defence system
    Developed By A unit under the IAF’s Maintenance Command
    Range 10–12 km
    Target Low-flying aerial targets
    Speed Missiles operating at a speed range of 2 to 2.5 Mach
    Key Features – Uses existing inventory of Vympel R-73E missiles

    – Twin-turret launch platform

    – Capable of single and salvo modes
    Role in Defence Supplementing IAF’s Akash and SPYDER systems, replacing older systems like Pechora and OSA-AK
    Deployment Not specified

    https://www.hindustantimes.com/videos/world-news/indian-missile-shield-against-potential-threats-from-pak-china-iaf-samar-system-in-action-101702815648038.html

  • A security breach that must lead to sweeping changes

    Massive security breach in Lok Sabha, 2 intruders jump from gallery, spray gas | Latest News India - Hindustan Times

    Central idea 

    The article discusses a security breach in the Lok Sabha, highlighting lapses in personal screening and outdated technology. It emphasizes the need for advanced security measures, questions the responsibility for technology upgrades, and calls for a comprehensive committee to ensure continuous oversight. The incident prompts reflections on securing democracy’s portals through constant monitoring and technological advancements.

    Key Highlights:

    • Security Breach: Lok Sabha breach on December 13, 2023, prompts concerns despite heightened security measures post-2001 attack.
    • Causes of Breach: Inadequate personal screening, traditional metal detectors’ limitations, and lack of vigilance contribute to breach.
    • Technological Need: Emphasizes the necessity for advanced technology like backscatter scanners for effective Parliament screening.

    Key Challenges:

    • Screening Limitations: Traditional metal detectors fail to detect non-metallic threats, showcasing screening vulnerabilities.
    • Vacant Security Positions: Key roles, including Joint Secretary, Security, and chiefs of CRPF and CISF, remain vacant.
    • Responsibility Gap: Ambiguity in responsibility for introducing and upgrading security technology in Parliament.

    Key Terms and Phrases:

    • Parliament Security: Focus on the breach and the need for robust security measures.
    • Backscatter Scanner: Technological solution highlighted for enhanced visitor screening.
    • Unlawful Activities Act: Sections 16 and 18 invoked against intruders for acts related to terrorism.

    Key Quotes and Statements:

    • “The youngsters involved…inflicted the gravest damage by revealing gaps in Parliament security.”
    • “To protect the hallowed portals…security infrastructure is constantly monitored and upgraded with resolve.”

    Key Examples and References:

    • Terrorist Attack Reference: Highlights 2001 attack and subsequent security enhancements.
    • Legal Action: Sections 16 and 18 of the Unlawful Activities Act invoked against intruders.

    Key Facts and Data:

    • Vacant Positions: Key security positions, including Joint Secretary, Security, and chiefs of CRPF and CISF, remain unfilled.
    • Technology Gap: Absence of advanced technology, like backscatter scanners, for thorough screening.

    Critical Analysis:

    • Access Control Critique: Lapses in access control and personal screening procedures scrutinized.
    • Responsibility Query: Raises questions about responsibility for introducing and upgrading security technology.
    • Committee Advocacy: Advocates a comprehensive committee with MPs and specialists for continuous security oversight.

    Way Forward:

    • Supervision Call: Urges Secretary, Security, in the Cabinet Secretariat to supervise Parliament security.
    • Committee Formation: Recommends a committee with MPs and specialists for regular security monitoring.
    • MP Cooperation: Stresses the importance of MPs cooperating with enhanced security measures to protect democracy’s portals.

  • An anti-terror law and its interference with liberty

    UAPA Bill to designate individuals as terrorists introduced in house - The Economic Times

    Central idea 

    The Jammu and Kashmir High Court’s November 17, 2023 judgment in journalist Fahad Shah’s case questions the broad interpretation of terrorism under UAPA, rejecting its use for defamation. It emphasizes judicial scrutiny in upholding personal liberty, challenging Section 43-D(5), and calls for legal reforms and accountability, urging a just way forward.

    Key Highlights:

    • Court’s Intervention: The Jammu and Kashmir High Court’s November 17, 2023 judgment intervened in journalist Fahad Shah’s case, granting him bail and partially setting aside charges under UAPA and FCRA.
    • Call for Circumspection: The court emphasized the imperative for circumspection in enforcing anti-terror laws, particularly considering their impact on personal liberty.
    • Defamation vs. Terrorism: Rejecting the government’s argument, the court challenged the notion that publishing an article harming India’s reputation constituted an act of terrorism.

    Key Challenges:

    • Vague Terrorism Offenses: The vague text of terrorism offenses under UAPA allows arrests in situations disconnected from actual incidents of violence, contributing to misuse.
    • Section 43-D(5) Dilemma: The provision preventing bail if accusations are ‘prima facie true’ poses challenges to personal liberty, raising concerns about procedural fairness.

    Key Terms and Phrases:

    • UAPA: Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, the primary anti-terror statute in India.
    • FCRA: Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, governing foreign funding.
    • Section 43-D(5): UAPA provision restricting bail based on the ‘prima facie true’ criterion.
    • Clear and Present Danger: Legal test invoked to restrict arrests based on a perceived immediate threat.

    Key Quotes:

    • “To treat allegations of defaming the country as terrorism seemed like a bridge just too far to cross.”
    • “Provisions such as Section 43-D(5) were meant to prevent the easy release of persons such as the imaginary bomber.”
    • “Both the law enforcement agency and the court must apply their mind to ensure that only in cases where a ‘clear and present danger’ is evinced are persons taken into custody.”

    Key Statements:

    • Judicial Emphasis: The judgment underscores the need for greater circumspection in enforcing anti-terror laws, especially concerning personal liberty.
    • Defamation Clarification: Defamation of the country was deemed not punishable under UAPA, challenging the expansive interpretation of terrorism.

    Critical Analysis:

    • Judicial Accountability: While not revolutionary, the decision highlights the importance of accountability in state actions, particularly in the context of oppressive laws.
    • Compensation Consideration: The legal regime needs to address compensations for wrongful arrest and detention, ensuring accountability and justice.

    Way Forward:

    • Legal Reforms: The legal system should consider reforms addressing compensations for wrongful arrests and enhancing state accountability.
    • Upholding Constitutional Principles: Courts must continue upholding constitutional principles, ensuring a commitment to accountability in state actions.