Type: op-ed snap

Central idea

The article highlights Arun Maira’s insights on the gender disparity in economic narratives, emphasizing the undervaluation of women’s contributions, the evolving challenges in global employment patterns, and the need for a more inclusive and care-focused approach to economic development, particularly in the context of India and the G-20’s call for a holistic vision beyond GDP

Challenges in How We See Money and Work:

• Not Enough Women Recognized: The Nobel Prize in Economics mostly goes to men, leaving out women’s important contributions. Only three women have won it so far.
• Forgetting the Value of Care: The work women do at home, taking care of family and community, isn’t seen as important for the economy. This is a big problem.
• Jobs Changing Globally: The way people work is changing worldwide. More jobs are now short-term or in the gig economy. This is a big challenge for India, which has a lot of young people.
• Not Paying Enough for Important Jobs: Jobs like taking care of families or working in health and education are crucial, but the people doing these jobs, mostly women, are not paid well.

India’s Economic Situation:

• Problems for Young People: In India, even though the economy is growing fast, it’s hard for young people to find good jobs with good pay and security.
• Need More Focus on Care: India ranks 132nd in human development, and we need to spend more on services that take care of people. But sadly, jobs like taking care of families or working in health and education are not paid much.
• G-20’s Call for a Different Way: Our Prime Minister has asked the G-20 for a new approach, one that looks beyond just making money. He says it’s time to think of the world as one family.

Checking How Well We’re Doing:

• Progress Slow for Big Global Goals: The G-20 says we’re not doing great halfway to our big global goals. Only 12% of the things we wanted to achieve are on track.
• Time for a Big Change: Arun Maira says we need to change how we solve problems. The usual way is not working, so we need to try something new.

Seeing Economics in a New Way:

• Thinking About Everyone: Maira says we need to change how we see our economy. It’s not just about making things and competing. It’s about taking care of people.
• Looking at What Women Do: Women, according to Maira, do a lot of important work that isn’t always noticed. Nobel laureate Elinor Ostrom showed that when women are in charge, communities work well together.

What Needs to Change:

• Giving Women More Power: Maira says we need to let women shape how things work, not just follow what men have set up.
• Letting Local Communities Decide: Instead of having big experts decide everything, Maira says we should let local communities come up with their solutions. What works in one place might not work in another.

Conclusion:

Changing how we think about our economy is not easy, but it’s important. Maira tells us that we should listen to regular people, especially women, and let them help make things better. This way, we can build a future where everyone is taken care of, and our world becomes one big family.

Central idea:

• The decline of independent Dalit political parties is linked to changing aspirations and a failure to address the rising class of politically aspirant Dalits, who seek economic mobility. The need for a shift from conventional identity-based politics to a more dynamic, economically focused approach is crucial for the survival of these parties. Ensuring democratic functioning and preventing dynastic tendencies is essential for relevance in the evolving political landscape.

Who Are Dalits?

• Dalits, historically known as untouchables, are marginalized and oppressed communities in India who have faced severe discrimination and social exclusion based on their caste. They constitute a significant portion of the Indian population.

Dalits in India:

• The latest data on the number of Dalits in India is from the National Sample Survey Office’s (NSSO) 75th Round Survey, which was conducted in 2017-18. The survey found that there are approximately 272 million Dalits in India, which is about 17% of the total population.
• This means that the Dalit population has increased by about 3% since the 2011 Census. This increase is likely due to a number of factors, including population growth, improved census methodology, and increased awareness of Dalit identity.

Dalit Movements in India:

• 19th Century: The Self-Respect Movement, led by E.V. Ramasamy Naicker, challenged the caste system and advocated for social justice for Dalits.
• Early 20th Century: The Depressed Classes Movement, led by B.R. Ambedkar, fought for the rights of Dalits, including education, employment, and political representation.
• 1950s: The Indian government passed a number of laws to protect the rights of Dalits, including the Untouchability (Offences) Act of 1955 and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act of 1989.
• Late 20th Century: Dalit movements continued to fight for social justice and equality, including the Dalit Panthers movement in the 1970s and the Bahujan Samaj Party movement in the 1980s.

Changing Political Landscape:

• While dalit political parties played a crucial role in empowering Dalits, they are facing organizational challenges and a decline in electoral performance.
• Some Dalit leaders are shifting to mainstream political parties, further weakening independent Dalit politics.
• Rising aspirations among Dalit communities, driven by education and affirmative action, are leading to a quest for political space in other parties.
• Social welfare schemes by major political parties are influencing Dalit voters, creating a new Dalit mentality.

What Is the Need for Democratic Functioning of dalit parties?

• Adapting to Changing Aspirations: Independent Dalit parties need to adapt to the evolving aspirations of Dalit communities, which now emphasize socio-economic mobility alongside identity politics.
• Preventing Dynastic Tendencies: Ensuring democratic functioning within these parties is essential to prevent the growth of dynastic political culture, enabling grassroots leaders to have a say in the party’s direction.
• Balancing Identity and Socio-economic Goals: These parties should develop a political agenda that combines the politics of identity with the economics of identity to cater to the new aspirations of the Dalit community.
• Safeguarding Grassroots Participation: By allowing grassroots leaders to have a role in the party’s decision-making process, independent Dalit parties can ensure that the concerns and needs of the most marginalized Dalits are addressed effectively.

Status of Dalit politics:

• Weakening Independent Dalit Parties: RPI and BSP face declining influence and organizational challenges.
• Fragmentation and Desertion: Internal divisions, leader departures, and shifting alliances affect party stability.
• Loss of Base Voters: RPI, BSP losing votes to dominant parties like BJP and Congress.
• Changing Aspirations: Dalits now seek meaningful political space due to education and affirmative actions.
• Shift from Identity to Aspiration: Transition from identity politics to socio-economic mobility aspirations is challenging traditional modes.

Decline in performance of Dalit political parties

• Electoral Erosion: Dalit political parties, including the BSP and RPI, have experienced a decline in their electoral performance, losing ground to mainstream parties.
• Loss of Base Support: Many Dalit parties have witnessed a loss of their core voter base to dominant regional and national parties like the BJP and Congress.
• Changing Aspirations: Evolving aspirations among Dalit communities, driven by education and affirmative actions, are challenging the parties’ ability to connect with their constituents.
• Shift to Socio-economic Focus: The traditional focus on identity politics is waning, and Dalit parties are struggling to adapt to the new emphasis on socio-economic mobility and development.

Future of Dalit Politics:

• Uncertainty for Independent Parties: Independent Dalit parties like RPI and BSP face an uncertain future due to internal issues and declining influence.
• Deepening Democracy: Some believe that as Indian democracy matures, mainstream parties may better represent Dalit interests, diminishing the need for separate Dalit parties.
• Aspiring Political Space: Dalits aspire for greater political participation, which could shape the future of Dalit politics.
• Socio-economic Focus: The future may see a shift from identity-based politics to socio-economic goals, aligning with evolving Dalit aspirations.

Significance of dalit politics:

• Empowerment of Dalits: Independent Dalit political parties have played a pivotal role in raising the political consciousness of Dalits and advocating for their rights and dignity.
• Political Representation: These parties have been instrumental in increasing the political representation of Dalits in India, giving them a platform to voice their concerns and grievances.
• Awareness and Solidarity: The existence of independent Dalit political parties has created awareness about Dalit issues and fostered a sense of solidarity among marginalized communities.

Challenges:

• Electoral Erosion: Independent Dalit political parties are facing a gradual decline in their electoral influence, with many Dalit leaders defecting to dominant regional and national parties.
• Shifting Aspirations: Rising aspirations among Dalit communities, driven by education and affirmative action, are causing a shift from identity-based politics to socio-economic mobility aspirations. This transition poses a challenge for Dalit parties that fail to adapt.
• Competition from Mainstream Parties: Dominant national and regional parties are actively vying for Dalit voters, further challenging the influence of independent Dalit political parties.

Initiatives and schemes by Indian Government for Dalits:

• Reservation Policy: India implements reservations for SC, ST, and OBC in education and government jobs, aiming to provide opportunities for historically marginalized communities.
• Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act: Enacted in 1989, it legally protects Dalits and Adivasis from caste-based discrimination and violence, with strict penalties for offenders.
• Ambedkar Post-Matric Scholarship: A financial support program for Dalit and economically disadvantaged students pursuing higher education, covering tuition fees, books, and related expenses.
• Ambedkar Hastshilp Vikas Yojana (AHVY): Launched by the Ministry of Textiles, it aids Dalit artisans through training, market linkages, and financial support to promote their traditional handicrafts and skills.

Way Forward:

• Independent Dalit parties need to redefine their political agendas by integrating socio-economic mobility with identity politics.
• Democratic functioning within these parties must be encouraged to give space to grassroots leaders.
• A multi-polar Dalit politics may emerge as leaders, cadres, and Dalit masses disperse among different political parties, emphasizing their rising political values.
• The government should continue its affirmative action policies and address the socio-economic disparities faced by Dalits.