💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

Distribution: yearly

  • Gene-Edited Mustard: Less pungent, more useful

    Central Idea

    • Among India’s domestically grown oilseeds, rapeseed-mustard stands out.
    • However, its pungent oil and unpalatable meal have posed challenges for both consumers and livestock.
    • Scientists have undertaken breeding efforts to create Canola-quality (white) mustard with reduced pungency and improved meal quality.

    About Rapeseed-Mustard

    • Rapeseed-Mustard: India’s significant oilseed is rapeseed-mustard, contributing significantly to vegetable oil production and meal availability.
    • Pungency: Mustard seeds contain glucosinolates, compounds that give the oil and meal their pungent flavor and odor.

    Quest for Canola-Quality Mustard

    • Canola-Quality Pursuit: Scientists aimed to breed mustard lines with low glucosinolate content similar to Canola.
    • Reducing Pungency: Efforts to create low-pungency oil and meal have faced challenges due to the necessity of glucosinolates in plant defense.
    • Vulnerability to Pests and Diseases: Canola-quality mustard lines have not been cultivated extensively due to their susceptibility to pests and diseases.

    Role of Gene Editing

    • Innovative Research: Gene editing emerges as a solution to balance glucosinolate levels for improved quality and plant defence.
    • CRISPR/Cas9 Approach: Researchers used CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing tool to target and modify 10 out of 12 GTR genes in Indian mustard.
    • Achieving Desired Changes: Editing GTR genes led to lower glucosinolate content in seeds while preserving higher levels in leaves and pod walls.

    Benefits of GE Mustard

    • Easy Synthesis: Glucosinolates are synthesized in mustard leaves and pod walls before translocation to seeds.
    • Dual Benefit of Glucosinolates: The study revealed that edited mustard lines with low-seed glucosinolates exhibited improved defence against pests and diseases.

    Distinction between GE and GM

    • GE Mustard: The new mustard lines are genome-edited (GE), not genetically modified (GM).
    • Transgene-Free Solution: Unlike GM crops with foreign genes, GE lines have no foreign DNA and no residual gene-editing tools.

    Regulatory Considerations and Future Prospects

    • Regulation Changes: India’s regulatory environment is shifting, exempting GE plants free of exogenous introduced DNA from stringent approval requirements.
    • Potential Field Trials: Scientists are preparing for open field trials of GE mustard, with expectations to conduct them in the upcoming planting season.
    • Importance of Self-Reliance: With massive edible oil imports, domestic oilseed production through breeding advancements like GE mustard becomes vital for self-reliance.

    Economic Implications and Self-Sufficiency

    • Importance of Oilseeds: India’s substantial edible oil imports highlight the need for boosting domestic oilseed production.
    • Mustard’s Role: Mustard’s high oil content and protein-rich meal position it as a significant oilseed crop.
    • Potential Benefits: Both GE mustard and GM hybrid mustard have the potential to reduce dependence on imported vegetable oils.

    Conclusion

    • The journey of rapeseed mustard from its pungent state to a potentially improved, self-sufficient crop demonstrates the power of innovative breeding techniques.
    • The breakthrough in gene editing opens doors to balancing quality and plant defence.

    Back2Basics: CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing Tool

    crispr mustard

    • CRISPR-Cas9 is a revolutionary technology allowing precise genetic modifications by altering DNA sequences.
    • It’s a cutting-edge tool in genetic manipulation, generating excitement in the scientific community.

    How does it work?

    • CRISPR-Cas9 employs two crucial components for DNA change:
      1. Cas9 enzyme: Functions as molecular scissors, cutting DNA strands at a specific location.
      2. Guide RNA (gRNA): Composed of a short, pre-designed RNA sequence within a longer scaffold. The scaffold guides Cas9 to the right genomic spot.
    • Guide RNA complements a target DNA sequence. It binds only to the specific DNA region, avoiding unintended interactions.
    • Cas9 follows guide RNA to the DNA sequence, creating a cut across both strands.
    • Cell recognizes the DNA damage and initiates repair.
    • Scientists harness repair processes to modify genes in a cell’s genome.

  • Ajnala Massacre of 1857 and its Rediscovery

    ajnala

    Central Idea

    • A recent collaborative effort of professional geneticists has resulted in a scientific confirmation of the Ajnala massacre – an event lost to history for 165 years.
    • This project, marked by emotional intensity and rigorous analysis, brought long-lost victims to light through molecular and isotope data.

    Ajnala Massacre

    • Buried Tragedy: 282 soldiers of the 26th Native Bengal Infantry Regiment met a brutal fate during the 1857 uprising, drowned in a well by the British East India Company.
    • Discovery of Location: Cooper’s book provided clues that helped locate the 1857 Kallianwala Martyrs’ Well beneath the Gurdwara Singh Sabha in Ajnala.
    • Chance Encounter: In 2003, historian Surinder Kochhar found a reference to ‘Ajnala’ in a discarded book titled “Crisis in Punjab” by Frederick Henry Cooper.
    • Massacre Rediscovered: Kochhar’s research led to the revelation of the Ajnala Massacre, a grim incident hidden for over 157 years.

    Excavation and Revelation

    • Unveiling the Remains: The well was excavated in 2014, exposing the skeletal remains of the soldiers.
    • Gruesome Discovery:  During the 1857 Sepoy mutiny, many Indian soldiers revolted against the British. Around 500 revolted at Mian Mir Cantonment in Lahore.
    • Evading execution: They swam across the Ravi River to reach the town of Ajnala, now in Amritsar district. Of them, 218 were killed by British soldiers at Dadian Sofian village near Ajnala.
    • Dumped into a well: The remaining 282 were stuffed in a small room, where many died of asphyxiation. The rest were shot dead and their bodies were thrown into a well, which was later named “Kalianwala Khu” and “Shaheedan da Khu”.

    Verification and Acknowledgment

    • Scientific Verification: DNA-based evidence confirmed that the remains belonged to soldiers of the 26th Native Bengal Infantry regiment.
    • Historical Importance: The Ajnala Massacre adds to the narrative of the 1857 Indian uprising against the British East India Company’s oppression.

    Conclusion

    • The Ajnala Massacre underscores the often-overlooked brutalities of the 1857 Indian uprising.
    • The lack of acknowledgement and memorials can be attributed to the government’s hesitance to address uncomfortable aspects of history.

  • India launches Global Initiative on Digital Health (GIDH)

    Central Idea

    • In a significant stride towards global healthcare innovation, the World Health Organization (WHO) and India’s G20 presidency have jointly unveiled the ‘Global Initiative on Digital Health’ (GIDH).
    • The announcement was made at the Health Minister’s Meeting during the G20 Summit, hosted by the Indian Government.

    What is GIDH?

    • WHO and G20 Partnership: The WHO and India’s G20 presidency collaboratively introduced the ‘Global Initiative on Digital Health’ (GIDH).
    • Strategy Implementation: GIDH functions as a WHO-managed platform, supporting the implementation of the ‘Global Strategy on Digital Health 2020–2025.’
    • Transformation Acceleration: The WHO, as the strategy’s Secretariat, facilitates the global convergence of standards, best practices, and resources for expediting digital health system transformation.

    Objectives of the GIDH Initiative

    • Measurable Outcomes: GIDH aspires to unite nations and partners, aiming to achieve tangible results through concerted efforts.
    • Prioritizing Investment Plans: The initiative seeks to establish focused investment plans for the transformation of digital health, driven by clear priorities.
    • Enhancing Resource Transparency: GIDH works towards greater transparency in reporting digital health resources, ensuring effective resource allocation.
    • Facilitating Global Collaboration: The initiative fosters the exchange of knowledge and collaboration among regions and countries to expedite progress.
    • Comprehensive Governance: GIDH supports holistic government approaches to digital health governance within countries.
    • Boosting Support: The initiative aims to enhance both technical and financial support for the implementation of the ‘Global Strategy on Digital Health 2020–2025’ and its forthcoming phase.

    India’s Role and Vision

    • Digital Health Innovation: India’s G-20 Health Minister emphasized India’s role in digital health innovation at the G-20 Health Ministers’ Meeting.
    • National Digital Health Architecture: India’s efforts for a comprehensive digital health ecosystem, exemplified by the Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission (ABDM), were highlighted.

  • Last survivors of Piripkura tribe found

    piripkura

    Central Idea

    • Deep within the Amazon rainforest, the story of Tamandua Piripkura unfolds, embodying the struggle of Indigenous people.
    • This man is one of the last three survivors of the Piripkura people.

    Who are the Piripkura?

    • The Piripkura tribe is a small and isolated indigenous group in Brazil.
    • They are known for their extreme isolation and limited contact with the outside world.
    • They have intentionally avoided contact with mainstream society and have maintained their traditional way of life for generations.
    • The Piripkura territory is located in the state of Mato Grosso, Brazil.
    • Their land lies within the Amazon rainforest, an area that is rich in biodiversity and crucial for the ecological balance of the region.

    Their dwindling population

    • The Piripkura tribe is estimated to consist of only 3 individuals.
    • Exact population figures are difficult to determine due to their isolation and the challenges associated with conducting a comprehensive census.
    • They face numerous challenges to their survival, including threats from illegal logging, mining, and land encroachment.

  • Megalithic Hat Stones unearthed in Nagaparamba

    megalithic

    Central Idea

    • Recent archaeological excavations in Tirunaya near Nagaparamba (Kerala) have brought to light a collection of hemispherical laterite stones known as hat stones or Thoppikkallu in Malayalam.

    Nagaparamba Megalithic Treasure

    • Thoppikkallu: Hat stones, referred to as Thoppikkallu in Malayalam, served as lids for burial urns during the megalithic era, offering a unique glimpse into burial practices.
    • Cultural Insights: The discoveries may provide valuable insights into the life and culture of the ancient inhabitants of the area, dating back more than 2,000 years.

    Unraveling the Mystery of Megaliths

    • Megalithic Structures: Megaliths were constructed as either burial sites or commemorative memorials, creating a distinctive landscape of archaeological significance.
    • Burial Remains: Examples of burial megaliths include dolmenoid cists, cairn circles, and capstones, each with its unique design and purpose.
    • Non-Sepulchral Megaliths: Non-burial megaliths, such as menhirs, hold a different purpose and significance.
    • Historical Context: The majority of Indian megaliths are attributed to the Iron Age, spanning from 1500 BC to 500 BC.
    • Regional Concentration: These intriguing structures are concentrated in states like Maharashtra, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, and Telangana.

  • Article 370 Abrogation: KN Rajagopal v. M Karunanidhi Verdict (1971)

    Central Idea

    • A landmark Supreme Court judgment from over four decades ago has become an obstacle to the Centre’s assertion that the “breakdown of constitutional machinery” in J&K.
    • Over this, the centre had justified the events leading to the abrogation of Article 370 on 5 August 2019.
    • This judgment poses a significant challenge to the narrative surrounding the abrogation.

    Rajagopal versus M Karunanidhi Verdict (1971)

    • Governor’s Role: The judgment underscores that the Governor, though appointed by the President, does not lead to a breakdown of constitutional machinery when a legislative Assembly is dissolved.
    • Historical Precedent: The Constitution Bench judgment in K.N. Rajagopal versus M Karunanidhi, authored by Chief Justice S.M. Sikri in 1971, supports this view.

    Essence of the Judgment

    • Central Tenet: The judgment clarifies that when a Governor dissolves a State’s legislative Assembly and assumes its powers, the premise of “failure of constitutional machinery” under Article 356 becomes untenable.
    • Absurdity of Claim: It is pointed out that it’s illogical for the President to assert a “breakdown of constitutional machinery” when the Governor, whom the President appointed, already holds control.

    Application to J&K’s Scenario

    • J&K’s Timeline: In Jammu and Kashmir, the Governor dissolved the State legislative assembly on November 21, 2018.
    • President’s Rule: A proclamation of President’s rule was issued on December 19, 2018, followed by Parliament’s approval on January 3, 2019. Extension of President’s rule occurred on July 3, 2019.
    • Abrogation of A370: The Centre, on August 5, 2019, introduced the Constitution (Application to Jammu and Kashmir) Order, changing the provisions of Article 370.
    • Legislating the abrogation: The next day, Parliament abrogated Article 370, reorganizing the State of Jammu and Kashmir.

    Legal issues with Article 370 Abrogation

    • Challenging Constitutionality: Litigants argues that beneath the perceived constitutionality, there lies evident illegality. Once the State Assembly was dissolved, there was no breakdown of machinery.
    • Governor’s Powers: The Governor’s assumption of powers contradicts such a breakdown, making the President’s proclamation under Article 356 jurisdictionally flawed.
    • Constitutional Entity: Referring to the S.R. Bommai case, it is highlighted that a State as a “constitutional entity” should outlast Article 356’s intervention.

  • Kashmir Issue: Why India went to the UN

    kashmir un

    Central Idea

    • The intricate tale of Kashmir’s “special status” has been a source of enduring conflict and turmoil within India and its neighbouring Pakistan.
    • Unravelling the events that led to rolling in of the UN in the Kashmir dispute, requires delving into verified historical facts.

    Kashmir: Birth of a Princely State

    • Origins: The princely state of Jammu and Kashmir emerged in 1846 when the British sold Kashmir to Gulab Singh, the Dogra jagirdar of Jammu, after the first Anglo-Sikh War.
    • Hari Singh’s Heritage: Maharaja Hari Singh, the ruler during India’s independence, was Gulab Singh’s descendant and envisioned an independent and neutral Kashmir.

    Dilemma of Accession

    • Independence Aspiration: Hari Singh aspired for Kashmir’s independence post-British rule, with a vision of a “Switzerland of the East.”
    • Viceroy’s Visit: Viceroy Lord Louis Mountbatten suggested Hari Singh’s accession to either India or Pakistan, but the state wanted to remain independent.
    • Gurdaspur’s Significance: The Radcliffe Boundary Commission’s decision on Gurdaspur was pivotal. The district’s inclusion in India secured a practical route for Kashmir’s potential accession.

    The Turning Point

    • Infiltration and Conflict: Infiltrators crossed over from Pakistan in October 1947, advancing swiftly. The identity of the infiltrators and their motivation remains disputed between India and Pakistan.
    • Pakistani Motivation: Pakistan claims the raiders acted independently, avenging atrocities against Muslims in India, while India asserts their involvement was orchestrated.
    • Jinnah’s Knowledge: Opinions diverge on whether Jinnah was informed about the infiltrators’ plan, with conflicting accounts of his awareness.

    Imperative of Accession

    • Hari Singh’s Request: Hari Singh requested military aid from India in response to the infiltrations, leading to India’s intervention.
    • Instrument of Accession: VP Menon brought the Instrument of Accession from Hari Singh, formalizing the state’s accession to India.

    Plebiscite and the UN Involvement

    • Mountbatten’s Stance: Mountbatten’s recommendation to involve the UN stemmed from his pessimism about bilateral negotiations between India and Pakistan.
    • UN Involvement: India took the Kashmir issue to the UN in 1948, seeking intervention to resolve the conflict. The framing of the issue as the “India-Pakistan question” was seen as a symbolic defeat for India.
    • Stance of World Powers: US and UK’s inclination toward Pakistan, in part due to geopolitical considerations, influenced the UN’s approach to the issue.

    Why did India go to the UN?

    • International Attention: India sought global attention and legitimacy by involving the UN in the Kashmir conflict.
    • Bilateral Stalemate: Unsuccessful bilateral negotiations pushed India to explore UN mediation.
    • Mountbatten’s Advice: Lord Mountbatten’s pessimism about the India-Pakistan agreement led to UN recommendation.
    • Symbolic Significance: Framing the issue at the UN highlighted its international nature.
    • Legitimacy and Process: UN involvement provided a structured platform for presenting arguments.
    • Conflict Avoidance: UN mediation aimed to prevent further conflict escalation in the region.

    Post-UN Scenario

    • Plebiscite Debate: India and Pakistan both agreed on the need for a plebiscite, but differing circumstances delayed its execution.
    • India’s Hardened Stand: As Pakistan aligned with the US, Nehru’s stance against a plebiscite intensified, fearing bias due to Sheikh Abdullah’s inclination towards India.
    • Integration with India: Jammu and Kashmir participated in India’s democratic processes, and Article 370, granting the region “special status,” was incorporated into the Indian Constitution.

    Conclusion

    • The complex history of Kashmir’s “special status” remains a subject of fervent debate, with deeply entrenched narratives on both sides.
    • It is within this intricate framework that the ongoing discussions and negotiations surrounding Kashmir’s future continue to unfold.

  • Hurricane Hilary’s rare journey towards West Coast

    hilary

    Central Idea

    • Hurricane Hilary’s unexpected trajectory towards Southern California and Mexico has caught meteorologists and residents off guard.
    • The only recorded instance of a tropical storm with hurricane-force winds hitting Southern California dates back to 1858, impacting San Diego.

    What is a Hurricane?

    • A hurricane, also known as a tropical cyclone or typhoon in different regions, is a powerful and intense tropical storm characterized by strong winds, heavy rainfall, and low atmospheric pressure.
    • Here are the key features and characteristics of a hurricane:
    1. Formation: Hurricanes typically form over warm ocean waters, where the sea surface temperature is at least 26.5 degrees Celsius (about 80 degrees Fahrenheit) or higher. Warm ocean water provides the energy needed to fuel the storm’s growth.
    2. Energy Source: Hurricanes derive their energy from the heat released when moist air rises and condenses into clouds and rain. This process, known as latent heat release, powers the storm and leads to the development of strong winds.
    3. Eye: At the center of a hurricane is a relatively calm and clear area known as the “eye.” The eye is surrounded by a circular band of intense thunderstorms called the “eyewall,” where the strongest winds and heaviest rainfall occur.
    4. Wind Speeds: Hurricanes are characterized by extremely strong winds that can reach speeds of over 74 miles per hour (119 kilometres per hour) for a storm to be classified as a hurricane. Major hurricanes can have wind speeds exceeding 111 miles per hour (179 kilometers per hour).
    5. Categories: Hurricanes are categorized based on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale, which ranges from Category 1 (weakest) to Category 5 (strongest). Category 1 hurricanes have sustained winds of 74-95 mph, while Category 5 hurricanes have winds greater than 157 mph.

    About Hurricane Hilary

    • Unlike hurricane-prone states on the Gulf of Mexico, California and Mexico’s west coast lack experience in dealing with such events.
    • Hurricane Hilary’s expected landfall in the Baja peninsula of Mexico poses risks of landslides, flooding, and extensive damage due to the region’s geographical features and population density.

    Factors behind its intensification

    • Ocean Temperature Factor: Hurricanes require ocean waters above 26 degrees Celsius to form. The west coast’s colder waters are less conducive to hurricane formation.
    • Vertical Wind Shear: Strong upper-level winds can disrupt hurricanes’ structure and prevent their formation. West coast’s stronger wind shear reduces the likelihood of hurricanes.
    • Trade Wind Influence: Trade winds, which steer hurricanes, play a pivotal role in directing them toward the east coast while diverting them away from the west coast.
    • Westward Trajectory: Hurricanes originating in the eastern Pacific tend to move west-northwest, taking them away from the west coast and out to sea.

    Climate Change induced factors

    • Climate Change Impact: Climate change leads to more frequent and intense hurricanes. Rising ocean temperatures due to greenhouse gas emissions contribute to increased hurricane intensity.
    • Ocean Heat Absorption: Oceans have absorbed 90% of excess heat from greenhouse gas emissions, leading to higher sea surface temperatures and stronger hurricanes.
    • Marine Heat Waves: Elevated sea surface temperatures result in marine heat waves, intensifying storm systems and amplifying their impact on land.
    • El Nino’s Role: El Niño, an abnormal warming of equatorial Pacific Ocean waters, can weaken wind shear in the eastern Pacific, creating conditions conducive to hurricane formation.

  • Deconstructing Gender Stereotypes: The Supreme Court’s Handbook

    gender

    Central Idea

    • The Supreme Court of India has taken a significant step to challenge outdated ideas, especially those affecting women, by releasing a special guide.
    • This guide introduces new words for lawyers and judges to use in court, aiming to fight harmful beliefs.

    Handbook on Combating Gender Stereotypes

    • The handbook provides a list of biased words and suggests better alternatives for legal documents.
    • Its main aim is to provide legal experts with the means to “identify, understand, and challenge stereotypes about women.”
    • It includes a list of terms that promote gender bias and offers alternative, fairer terms to be used in legal documents.

    Objective and Scope of the Handbook

    • Challenging Old Beliefs: The Supreme Court’s initiative aims to discard old-fashioned and harmful stereotypes, particularly those related to women, through the ‘Handbook on Combating Gender Stereotypes.’
    • CJI’s Vision: The handbook is introduced by Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, who explains its purpose: to help legal professionals recognize and counter gender-based stereotypes.
    • Language Transformation: The handbook includes a glossary of terms that contribute to gender bias and suggests better alternatives to be used in legal writings.

    Why such a move?

    [A] Language inflicting Stereotypes

    • The handbook points out terms in legal language that promote gender bias and provides suggestions for change.
    • Examples of Change: Instead of using “adulteress,” the handbook recommends using “Woman who has engaged in sexual relations outside of marriage” to avoid disrespectful language.
    • Removing Biases: The handbook encourages using simple terms like “woman” and “wife” instead of prefixes like “chaste” or “obedient.”
    • Using Neutral Language: Instead of negatively using “effeminate,” the handbook suggests using neutral terms like “confident” or “responsible.”

    [B] Avoiding labelling

    • Empowering Language: The handbook suggests using “survivor” or “victim” to describe individuals affected by sexual violence.
    • Respecting Preferences: The choice between “survivor” and “victim” should be based on the individual’s preference.

    [C] Conscious Reporting of Cases

    • Separating Attire and Consent: The handbook emphasizes that a person’s clothing should never excuse unwanted touching; consent remains essential.
    • Breaking Stereotypes: The handbook rejects the idea that delayed reporting of sexual assault means it didn’t happen.
    • Encouraging Reporting: The handbook acknowledges the bravery required to report sexual offenses due to societal pressures.

    Negative Effects of Gender Stereotypes

    • Widespread Impact: Gender stereotypes lead to exclusion and prejudice in workplaces, schools, and public places.
    • Education Example: The handbook illustrates how stereotypes affect students from marginalized communities, adding stress during exams.
    • Government Data: Minister Subhas Sarkar’s data on dropout rates among marginalized students is shared as an example.

    Legal reforms rebutting Gender Stereotypes

    • Cases for Equality: The Supreme Court points out cases that reject stereotypes, like Joseph Shine vs. Union of India, which struck down the “adultery” law.
    • Example Rulings: The court’s decisions in cases like the State of Jharkhand vs. Shailendra Kumar Rai and the State of Punjab vs. Gurmit Singh are explained.

    Conclusion

    • By offering alternatives to outdated and biased language, the handbook aims not only to reshape legal discussions but also societal viewpoints.
    • Its potential impact is anticipated to extend beyond legal matters, influencing everyday perspectives and contributing to a more equitable society.

  • Tamil Nadu vs. NEET: Balancing Equity and Autonomy

    Central Idea

    • The conflict between Tamil Nadu and the Centre over the National Eligibility and Entrance Test (NEET) has intensified.
    • It has reignited discussions about the transfer of education back to the State List of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution.

    Why in news?

    • Educational Autonomy: Chief Minister M.K. Stalin called for education’s transfer back to the State List, originally placed in the Concurrent List during the Emergency.
    • NEET Controversy: Tamil Nadu’s opposition to NEET escalated dramatically after the tragic suicides of a student and his father due to exam-related stress.

    Why Tamil Nadu Opposes NEET?

    • Undue competition: NEET, a centralised entrance exam for medical courses, faces opposition in Tamil Nadu due to its mechanical focus on marks.
    • Impact on Local Models: NEET disrupted models like Christian Medical College (CMC) Vellore, known for emphasizing aptitude over marks.
    • In-Service Quota Impact: NEET dismantled Tamil Nadu’s in-service quota for medical graduates, adversely affecting healthcare quality.
    • Disadvantages Marginalized: The exam favours affluent sections who affords lakhs worth coaching (esp. repeaters), disadvantaging underprivileged groups and hindering their aspirations.

    Emotive Nature of the Issue

    • Equity and Social Justice: Opposition to NEET is deeply rooted in demands for educational equity and autonomy, driven by social justice concerns.
    • Kamaraj’s Vision: Tamil Nadu’s education vision, shaped by Chief Minister K. Kamaraj, emphasized accessibility and empathy for unlettered masses.

    Legislative Struggles

    • AIADMK Bills: The previous AIADMK government introduced Bills in 2017 seeking state autonomy in medical admissions. They were returned by the President.
    • Stalin’s Efforts: In 2021, CM M.K. Stalin’s government passed the Tamil Nadu Admission to Undergraduate Medical Degree Courses Bill, 2021, aiming to abolish NEET and base admissions on Class 12 marks for social justice.
    • Governor’s Opposition: Governor R.N. Ravi, opposed to the anti-NEET Bill, delayed its forwarding to the President, leading to political tensions.

    Justice A.K. Rajan Committee

    • Committee Formation: The Justice A.K. Rajan Committee was established in 2021 to assess NEET’s fairness in medical admissions.
    • Critical Findings- Rich vs. Poor: The committee criticized NEET for favouring repeaters and coached students while disadvantaging first-time applicants, leading to reduced admissions among marginalized groups.

    Why is TN now fuming?

    • Concurrent List: Medical course admissions fall under the Concurrent List (Entry 25), allowing states to legislate on these matters.
    • Amending Central Laws: States can enact laws related to admissions and amend central laws on admission procedures, as long as they don’t contradict parliamentary laws.

    Current Scenario

    • Historic Public Health Practices: Tamil Nadu’s public health infrastructure thrived on retaining PG doctors, indicating the state’s effective healthcare practices.
    • Balancing Uniformity and Fairness: The NEET stalemate reflects the challenge of balancing uniformity with local values and needs.
    • Clash of Values: The conflict highlights the broader tension between central standardization and local autonomy, revealing deeper debates about democracy, equality, and social justice in India.

    Conclusion

    • The NEET controversy in Tamil Nadu is not merely about an entrance exam; it represents a larger struggle for educational equity, autonomy, and social justice.
    • The state’s commitment to its unique vision of education and healthcare clashes with central standardization, sparking a crucial dialogue about the nature of democracy and fairness in the country.

    Back2Basics: Seventh Schedule

    • The Seventh Schedule under Article 246 of the Indian Constitution is a pivotal component that delineates the allocation of powers between the central government and the states.
    • This framework ensures an efficient governance structure by classifying subjects into three lists:
    1. Union List: The Union List outlines subjects on which only the Parliament can legislate. This list includes crucial aspects like defense, foreign affairs, currency, communication, and more.
    2. State List: The State List enumerates matters solely under the jurisdiction of state legislatures. It encompasses areas such as public health, agriculture, police, local government, and others.
    3. Concurrent List: The Concurrent List incorporates subjects on which both Parliament and state legislatures can enact laws. However, in case of a conflict, federal supremacy grants authority to the Parliament’s law.

    Evolution and Dynamics

    • Over time, the Union List expanded to encompass significant areas such as defense, banking, and foreign affairs.
    • The State List’s scope included subjects like public order, police, and agriculture, critical for regional governance.
    • The Concurrent List reflects matters of shared importance like criminal law, civil procedure, population control, and more.

    Amendments and Special Provisions:

    • 42nd Amendment Act (1976): It transferred select subjects like education, forests, and administration of justice from the State List to the Concurrent List.
    • 101st Amendment Act (2018): It introduced a special provision for Goods and Services Tax (GST), allowing both Parliament and state legislatures to make laws regarding GST.

    Power Distribution and Conflict Resolution:

    • Parliament’s jurisdiction prevails over the State List and the Concurrent List in cases of overlap.
    • In cases of overlap between the Union List and the State List, the Union List takes precedence.
    • If there’s a conflict between the Union List and the Concurrent List, the Union List prevails.
    • In situations of conflict between central and state laws on a Concurrent List subject, central law prevails. An exception exists if the state law has the president’s assent.

    Consultative Approaches

    • Sarkaria Commission (1983) recommended maintaining the existing list allocation, emphasizing the absence of a strong case for transferring items from the Concurrent List to the State List.
    • Venkatachaliah Commission (2002) underscored the lack of a formal institution requiring consultation between the Union and states while legislating under the Concurrent List.