💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

GS Paper: GS2-13.Issues relating to development and management of Social Sector/Services relating to Health, Education, Human Resources.

  • [23rd September 2025] The Hindu Op-ed: The growing relevance of traditional medicine

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2019] How is the Government of India protecting traditional knowledge of medicine from patenting by pharmaceutical companies?

    Linkage: The question on protecting traditional knowledge from patenting directly links with India’s global Ayurveda outreach and the WHO Global Traditional Medicine Centre, which focus on safeguarding and validating traditional systems. The article highlights India’s investment in research, standardisation, and international cooperation to integrate and protect Ayurveda while projecting it globally.

    Mentor’s Comment

    The significance of traditional medicine has moved far beyond being an alternative to modern healthcare. With its widespread practice across 170 countries, increasing global market share, and India’s leadership through AYUSH, traditional medicine now represents a paradigm shift from reactive to preventive healthcare. This article explores the transformation of traditional medicine, India’s global leadership, scientific validation, and its contemporary relevance in addressing both lifestyle diseases and climate change.

    Introduction

    Traditional medicine, once considered peripheral to mainstream health systems, is increasingly being recognised as central to global health. The World Health Organization reports that 88% of its member-states practise traditional medicine, making it a cornerstone of healthcare for billions. India, with its vibrant AYUSH sector, is at the forefront of this transformation — combining ancient wisdom with modern science, and positioning itself as a global leader in preventive, sustainable, and inclusive healthcare.

    Why is traditional medicine in the news?

    The growing relevance of Ayurveda and related systems has been highlighted due to multiple firsts and major developments. The WHO Global Traditional Medicine Centre in India marks a historic milestone, anchoring India as a hub for global research and innovation in this field. The AYUSH industry’s eight-fold growth within a decade, and exports reaching $1.54 billion to 150 countries, reflect the scale of transformation. With the 2025 theme of “Ayurveda for People & Planet”, traditional medicine is being reframed not just as healthcare but as a holistic movement addressing lifestyle diseases, biodiversity conservation, and climate change.

    How significant is the global presence of traditional medicine?

    1. WHO report: 170 of 194 countries (88%) practise traditional medicine.
    2. Primary healthcare: For billions in low- and middle-income countries, it remains the first line of treatment due to affordability and accessibility.
    3. Market size: Global traditional medicine market projected to hit $583 billion by 2025, growing at 10–20% annually.
    4. Country data: China’s TCM valued at $122.4 billion, Australia’s herbal medicine at $3.97 billion, India’s AYUSH sector at $43.4 billion.

    What has been India’s transformation in AYUSH?

    1. Industrial growth: Over 92,000 MSMEs drive the AYUSH sector. Revenues expanded from ₹21,697 crore (2014-15) to ₹1.37 lakh crore today.
    2. Services sector: Generated ₹1.67 lakh crore in revenue.
    3. Exports: AYUSH and herbal products worth $1.54 billion reach over 150 countries.
    4. Recognition abroad: Ayurveda now has formal recognition as a medical system in multiple nations.
    5. Public awareness: NSSO (2022-23) survey — 95% rural, 96% urban awareness; over half of India used AYUSH in the past year.

    How is India promoting scientific validation and global outreach?

    1. Research institutions: AIIMS Ayurveda, National Institute of Ayurveda, and CCRAS focus on drug standardisation, clinical validation, and integrative care models.
    2. International cooperation: 25 bilateral agreements, 52 institutional partnerships, 43 AYUSH cells in 39 countries, 15 academic chairs abroad.
    3. WHO Centre: WHO Global Traditional Medicine Centre in India integrates traditional knowledge with AI, big data, and digital health.
    4. AI integration: WHO publication highlights AI’s role in predictive care and strengthening clinical validation.

    Why is Ayurveda relevant to global challenges today?

    1. Philosophy of balance: Between body–mind, human–nature, consumption–conservation.
    2. Lifestyle diseases: Offers preventive care against rising global non-communicable diseases.
    3. Climate change: Promotes sustainability and biodiversity conservation.
    4. Beyond humans: Extends to veterinary care and plant health.
    5. Theme 2025: “Ayurveda for People & Planet” underlines Ayurveda as both a wellness system and a planetary health framework.

    Conclusion

    Traditional medicine, led by Ayurveda, has transitioned from being an ancient practice to a modern global movement. India’s leadership, backed by research, exports, and global outreach, has made it central to the evolving global health architecture. As the world faces lifestyle disorders and ecological crises, Ayurveda’s holistic framework offers sustainable solutions for both people and the planet.

  • The Hard Truth About Out-of-Pocket Health Expenditure

    Introduction

    In India, healthcare financing is still heavily dependent on households directly paying for medical services. This out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE) often pushes families into a vicious cycle of poverty and ill-health. The National Health Accounts (NHA) claims that OOPE as a share of total health expenditure has sharply declined, from 64% in 2013-14 to 39% in 2021-22. On the surface, this appears to be a major policy success. However, a closer look suggests that these numbers may be misleading, as they rely heavily on a single survey base (NSS 75th round, 2017-18) and ignore the lived realities of health shocks, especially during COVID-19.

    Is OOPE in India Really Declining?

    1. NHA estimates: Show a steep decline in OOPE—from 64% in 2013-14 to 49% in 2017-18, and further to 39% in 2021-22.
    2. Basis of estimation: The 2017-18 NSS (75th round) forms the primary source, with later estimates extrapolated only for inflation.
    3. Question of accuracy: The decline may be linked to lower ailment reporting and reduced hospitalisation, not to falling medical costs.

    How Do Other Data Sources Contradict NHA?

    1. Consumer Expenditure Survey (CES) 2022-23: OOPE as share of household consumption rose—from 5.5% to 5.9% in rural areas and 6.9% to 7.1% in urban areas (2011-12 to 2022-23).
    2. Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI): Shows higher hospitalisation rates among the elderly, contrary to NSS-based decline.
    3. CPHS-CMIE Data: Reveals a V-shaped trend—steep fall in OOPE during COVID-19 due to under-utilisation, followed by a sharp rise. The NHA completely misses this fluctuation.
    4. National Income Accounts (NIA): Estimates show a steady rise in household health spending as a share of GDP, contradicting the NHA’s declining trend.

    Why Are NHA Estimates Considered Flawed?

    1. Single-source dependency: NHA depends mainly on the NSS morbidity survey, which underreports ailments.
    2. Exclusion of COVID-19 impact: No NSS data during the pandemic, leading to an unrealistic secular decline in NHA series.
    3. Ignoring insurance and premiums: Even after including premiums, NHA still shows a steep, unexplained fall in OOPE.
    4. Political convenience: Numbers risk being used for policy propaganda without reflecting ground-level hardship.

    What Are the Real Consequences of High OOPE?

    1. Poverty trap: Families borrow, sell assets, or cut consumption, leading to intergenerational poverty.
    2. Social impacts: Children drop out of school, women work longer hours, households skip meals.
    3. Rising health costs: Medicine prices and private care charges continue to rise, eroding household savings.
    4. COVID-19 experience: Families suffered catastrophic costs, which remain invisible in official accounts.

    What Is the Way Forward?

    1. Diversified data sources: Use CES, LASI, CMIE, NFHS, and private medical sales databases alongside NSS.
    2. Regular, timely surveys: Health rounds of NSS must be more frequent to capture shocks like pandemics.
    3. Integration with NIA: Align NHA estimates with National Income Accounts for consistency.
    4. Transparent policymaking: Avoid over-reliance on selective data that paints a rosy picture.

    Conclusion

    The debate over out-of-pocket health expenditure in India highlights the gulf between official statistics and lived realities. While the National Health Accounts show a sharp decline in OOPE, independent surveys and household-level data point towards rising medical costs and deepening financial distress. Over-reliance on a single survey base not only distorts the picture but also risks misleading health policy. For a country aspiring to achieve Universal Health Coverage, credible, diversified, and transparent data must form the backbone of decision-making. Without this, India risks celebrating statistical success while millions continue to be pushed into poverty and ill-health by catastrophic healthcare expenses.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2021] Besides being a moral imperative of a Welfare State, primary health structure is a necessary precondition for sustainable development. Analyse.

    Linkage: The persistence of high out-of-pocket health expenditure (OOPE) despite claims of decline shows the weakness of India’s primary health structure, as families still bear catastrophic costs. A robust primary health system would reduce dependence on expensive hospitalisation and prevent poverty traps. Thus, strengthening primary health care is not just a welfare obligation, but essential for achieving sustainable and inclusive development.

  • [16th September 2025] The Hindu Op-ed: Court’s nod to Mental Health as Right

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2020] In order to enhance the prospects of social development, sound and adequate health care policies are needed in the fields of geriatric and maternal health care. Discuss.

    Linkage: The 2025 Sukdeb Saha judgment extends the scope of Article 21 by making mental health a constitutional right, just as geriatric and maternal health are essential to social development. Both contexts highlight the need for sound, inclusive health policies that address neglected yet critical areas. The ruling reinforces the argument that without adequate mental healthcare, broader social development goals remain incomplete.

    Mentor’s Comment

    The recent Supreme Court judgment in Sukdeb Saha vs State of Andhra Pradesh (2025) has elevated mental health to the level of a constitutional right under Article 21. More than a verdict on an individual tragedy, it has emerged as a landmark with systemic implications, redefining how student suicides, institutional neglect, and structural victimisation are understood in India. This article dissects the judgment, its social, legal, and criminological dimensions, and its significance for UPSC aspirants.

    Introduction

    In July 2025, the Supreme Court of India declared mental health to be an integral part of the right to life under Article 21. Triggered by the tragic suicide of a 17-year-old NEET aspirant in Visakhapatnam, the case (Sukdeb Saha vs State of Andhra Pradesh) transcended individual loss to expose the systemic failures of India’s education ecosystem. For the first time, the Court explicitly linked student suicides with institutional neglect and structural violence, framing mental health as a public injustice rather than a private bereavement. This landmark ruling has far-reaching implications for governance, education, victimology, and social justice.

    Why is the Judgment in the News?

    The verdict is a constitutional milestone because it:

    1. Recognises mental health as a fundamental right under Article 21, not just a statutory right under the Mental Healthcare Act 2017.
    2. Issues binding Saha Guidelines mandating schools, colleges, hostels, and coaching institutes to proactively create mental health support systems.
    3. Shifts accountability from individual students to institutions, framing neglect as a form of structural violence.
    4. Addresses India’s alarming student suicide epidemic, exposing deep systemic and cultural failures.
    5. This is the first time the Court has extended the doctrine of state responsibility to mental well-being, making it a case of historic significance.

    How does the case highlight structural victimisation?

    1. Structural neglect: Education systems, coaching centres, and hostels create conditions of high pressure with little support, making students vulnerable.
    2. State complicity: By failing to provide safeguards, institutions and the state become indirect perpetrators of harm.
    3. Victimology lens: Students are not merely individuals battling internal struggles; they are victims of systemic injustice and exploitative cultures.

    Why does the verdict matter legally?

    1. Constitutional elevation: Mental health is no longer a mere statutory right but a fundamental right under Article 21.
    2. Gap filling: The Mental Healthcare Act 2017 remains poorly enforced; the judgment provides a stronger normative benchmark.
    3. Legislative force: The Saha Guidelines have the same weight as law until Parliament enacts a mental health code.

    What are the “Saha Guidelines”?

    1. Institutional responsibility: Schools, colleges, hostels, and coaching institutes must establish mental health support systems.
    2. Time-bound compliance: States and UTs must frame rules within two months.
    3. Monitoring mechanisms: Creation of district-level monitoring committees for accountability.
    4. Binding nature: These interim orders have legislative effect until codified.

    Can student suicides be seen as structural violence?

    1. Galtung’s theory: Structural violence occurs when societal structures systematically deprive individuals of basic needs.
    2. Application: Educational institutions that ignore psychological well-being indirectly inflict harm.
    3. Reframing suicides: Shifts the discourse from “personal failures” to systemic injustice requiring state intervention.

    What are the challenges in implementation?

    1. Institutional inertia: Schools and coaching centres often resist reform.
    2. Resource constraints: Lack of trained mental health professionals in India.
    3. Cultural barriers: Persistent stigma around psychological counselling.
    4. State responsibility: The verdict’s success depends on political will, monitoring, and investment in mental health infrastructure.

    Conclusion

    The Sukdeb Saha judgment is a watershed moment in constitutional jurisprudence. By recognising mental health as a core aspect of the right to life, it challenges society to confront uncomfortable truths about neglect, exploitation, and indifference in the education system. Yet, the ruling’s legacy will depend on whether the Saha Guidelines are translated into action or remain judicial rhetoric. For students, too often silenced by despair, this judgment is a promise of dignity, recognition, and justice.

  • Himachal Pradesh declared to be ‘Fully Literate’

    Why in the News?

    Himachal Pradesh was recently declared a ‘fully literate’ state, becoming the 5th State/UT after Goa, Ladakh, Mizoram, and Tripura.

    Various Definitions of Literacy / Full Literacy:

    • Ministry of Education (MoE) Definition: Literacy is the ability to read, write, and compute with comprehension, along with digital literacy and financial literacy as critical life skills.
    • Full Literacy (MoE): A State/Union Territory (UT) is considered fully literate at 95% literacy rate.
    • Census of India (2011): Any person aged 7 years or above who can read and write with understanding in any language is considered literate. Ability to read without writing is NOT counted as literacy.
    • ULLAS Programme: Understanding Lifelong Learning for All in Society launched in 2022. Literacy here means acquiring foundational skills of reading, writing, and arithmetic plus functional knowledge like time, currency, and digital use.
    • NILP: New India Literacy Programme (centrally sponsored, aligned with NEP 2020). Defines full literacy as achieving ≥95% literacy rate certified via assessments.

    How is Literacy attained under ULLAS / NILP?

    • Target Group: Adults (15+) who missed formal schooling are identified through door-to-door surveys or other state data.
    • Basic Training: Learners are taught reading, writing, and arithmetic (up to Class 3 level), along with practical skills like using calendars, reading time, handling currency/cheques, and making safe digital transactions.
    • Delivery Mechanism: Training delivered through the ULLAS mobile app or offline by student volunteers and community workers.
    • Assessment: Learners appear for FLNAT (Foundational Literacy and Numeracy Assessment Test), a 150-mark test available in regional languages.
    • Certification: On passing FLNAT, learners are certified by the NIOS (National Institute of Open Schooling) as literate.
    • Outcome: States/UTs are declared ‘fully literate’ when identified non-literates clear FLNAT and the literacy rate crosses the 95% threshold.
    [UPSC 2017] What is the aim of the programme ‘Unnat Bharat Abhiyan’ ?

    Options:

    (a) Achieving 100% literacy by promoting collaboration between voluntary organizations and government’s education system and local communities.

    (b) Connecting institutions of higher education with local communities to address development challenges through appropriate technologies. *

    (c) Strengthening India’s scientific research institutions to make India a scientific and technological Power.

    (d) Developing human capital by allocating special funds for health-care and education of rural and urban poor, and organizing skill development programmes and vocational training for them.

     

  • Ranking Pitfalls: India Rankings (2025) based on NIRF

    Introduction

    India’s higher education system is one of the largest in the world, and since 2016, the National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) has aimed to provide a structured evaluation of institutions. With participation expanding from 3,565 institutions in its inception year to 14,163 in 2025, and categories rising from four to seventeen, the NIRF has created a sense of competition and accountability. However, critical flaws remain: skewed weightage for subjective parameters, inadequate measurement of inclusivity, and overemphasis on reputational factors. These shortcomings risk reducing the exercise into a branding tool rather than a driver of equity and quality in higher education.

    Why is NIRF in the News?

    India Rankings 2025 has once again been dominated by legacy public institutions, underscoring persistent inequalities in India’s higher education landscape. Despite its expanded coverage, the framework continues to rely on flawed methodologies, including subjective peer perception and incomplete outreach and inclusivity parameters. Of particular concern is the neglect of socio-economically disadvantaged groups and students with disabilities in the inclusivity metric. The stakes are high: without reform, NIRF risks entrenching elitism and doing little to democratise access to quality education.

    Is NIRF making higher education more equitable?

    1. Outreach and Inclusivity (OI): Currently limited to regional and gender diversity while omitting socio-economic disadvantage and disability.
    2. Troubling trends: Only JNU and AIIMS, Delhi scored above 70 in OI among the top 10, exposing the marginalisation of weaker sections.
    3. Reservation policies: Central institutions still fail to adequately fill OBC, SC, and ST vacancies, undermining affirmative action.

    Are the ranking parameters robust and fair?

    1. Five key parameters: Teaching & resources (30%), research (30%), graduation outcomes (20%), outreach & inclusivity (10%), peer perception (10%).
    2. Peer perception flaw: Criticised by Education Minister; reputation-based, subjective, and often biased against state-run or suburban institutions.
    3. Self-declared data: Heavy reliance risks manipulation; false submissions remain unpunished.
    4. Bibliometric dependence: While verifiable, this excludes non-English and socially relevant research output.

    What challenges persist in India’s higher education system?

    1. Regional imbalance: Few top-quality institutions outside metropolitan hubs.
    2. Faculty shortage: Outside the top 100 institutions, a dearth of PhD-qualified teachers continues.
    3. Weak research culture: 58% of management institutions reported zero research publications.
    4. Mentorship gap: Legacy institutions rarely mentor emerging universities.

    How can NIRF evolve beyond rankings?

    1. Policy tool, not ritual: Insights must inform reforms instead of being an annual exercise.
    2. Stronger inclusivity metrics: Incorporating socio-economic and disability parameters alongside gender and region.
    3. Accountability: Penalising institutions submitting false data.
    4. Capacity building: Encouraging collaboration between established and upcoming institutions.
    5. Affirmative action: Monitoring recruitment policies and enforcing reservations in faculty hiring.

    Conclusion

    The NIRF has created awareness about institutional performance and expanded its scope significantly. Yet, unless it addresses fundamental flaws, especially inclusivity, fairness in assessment, and accountability, it risks becoming a branding exercise. For India’s higher education system to truly progress, rankings must serve as instruments of reform, driving equity, excellence, and social justice.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2015] The quality of higher education in India requires major improvement to make it internationally competitive. Do you think that the entry of foreign educational institutions would help improve the quality of technical and higher education in the country? Discuss.

    Linkage: The NIRF 2025 rankings expose gaps in research output, inclusivity, and global competitiveness of Indian institutions. While reforms in ranking parameters can drive internal improvements, the entry of foreign universities may create healthy competition and raise benchmarks. Thus, the PYQ directly connects with debates on how India can achieve globally competitive higher education through both domestic reforms and external participation.

  • How much is spent on children’s education in India

    Introduction

    India has long struggled with gender inequities in education. Despite government efforts like Beti Bachao, Beti Padhao and steady progress in enrolment, where girls now form 48% of the school population and even surpass men in gross enrolment ratios in higher education, financial investment by families continues to tilt in favor of boys. The 80th round of the National Sample Survey (Comprehensive Modular Survey on Education) reveals that boys consistently receive higher expenditure allocations across school stages and states, highlighting deep-rooted social biases in household decision-making.

    Significance of the recent NSS report

    1. New evidence: The 2024 survey covered 52,085 households and data for 57,742 students, making it one of the most comprehensive datasets on education expenditure.
    2. Contradiction with enrolment success: Despite progress in closing gender enrolment gaps, the spending patterns show that financial priorities still favor boys.
    3. Striking gap: In urban India, families spend ₹2,791 less per girl compared to boys, while in rural India, boys get 18% more spent on them.
    4. Long-term concern: Such expenditure biases translate into inequities in learning outcomes, employability, and overall empowerment.

    Gender patterns in household spending on education

    1. All stages of schooling: Per-student expenditure on girls is consistently lower than boys from pre-primary to higher secondary.
    2. Rural-urban divide: Rural families spend ₹1,373 more on boys; urban families spend 30% more on boys by higher secondary level.
    3. Course fees: Families pay on average 21.5% more in fees for boys.

    Private vs government schooling:

    1. 58.4% of girls are in government schools.
    2. 34% of boys access private unaided schools compared to 29.5% of girls.
    3. Tuition classes: While enrollment in coaching is similar (26% girls vs 27.8% boys), expenditure differs, by higher secondary, families spend 22% more on tuition for boys.

    State-level variations in educational expenditure

    1. Delhi, MP, Rajasthan, Punjab: More than 10 percentage points gender gap in private school enrolment.
    2. Tamil Nadu and Kerala: Gender parity—boys and girls access government and private schools almost equally.
    3. Northeast States: Reverse trend—more girls enrolled in private schools.
    4. Telangana, Tamil Nadu, West Bengal: Families spend vastly more on boys at higher secondary level.
      • Example: In Tamil Nadu, families spend ₹35,973 on boys vs ₹19,412 on girls.
    5. Kerala, Himachal Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh: More spending on girls at higher secondary, partly due to safety-related transport costs.

    Gender gap in private coaching expenditure

    1. Himachal Pradesh: Families spend ₹9,813 per boy vs ₹1,550 per girl on higher secondary tuition.
    2. Bihar, Jharkhand, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu: Also show significant tuition expenditure gaps.
    3. Implication: Coaching is seen as a gateway to competitive exams and better career prospects—girls being left out deepens structural disadvantages.

    Broader implications for gender equality

    1. Hidden inequality: Enrolment parity does not mean equity in quality or investment.
    2. Future workforce impact: Lower spending on girls limits their human capital development and perpetuates the gender pay gap.
    3. Policy blind spots: Subsidies and scholarships exist, but social norms continue to undervalue daughters’ education.

    Way Forward

    Bridging the gender gap in educational expenditure requires a multi-pronged approach that addresses not just affordability but also deep-rooted social norms.

    1. Strengthening targeted subsidies: Expansion of schemes like Beti Bachao, Beti Padhao, free bicycles for girls, and conditional cash transfers for secondary and higher education can encourage families to invest equally in daughters.
    2. Equalising access to quality education: Improving the quality of government schools and providing digital learning resources will reduce the need for costly private schooling and tuitions, thereby narrowing gendered disparities.
    3. Awareness and behavioural change: Community-level campaigns must challenge patriarchal mindsets that undervalue girls’ education. Civil society and self-help groups can be leveraged to reshape family-level decision-making.
    4. Transport and safety interventions: Ensuring safe and affordable transport for girls, particularly in higher secondary education, will address a key cost component that discourages investment.
    5. Monitoring and accountability: Data from National Sample Survey and Unified District Information System for Education (UDISE+) should be used to regularly monitor gendered expenditure gaps and inform evidence-based policies.
    6. Integrating ethics and social responsibility: Education policies must go hand in hand with fostering a sense of justice, fairness, and equal opportunity, so that families see daughters as equal bearers of human capital.

    Conclusion

    The NSS findings show that while India has moved forward in closing the gender gap in enrolment, it still struggles with a silent financial discrimination in household educational spending. Unless families start valuing daughters’ education equally, not just in words but also in investment, true gender equality in education will remain elusive. Corrective measures through policy nudges, financial incentives, and awareness campaigns are essential to bridge this invisible divide.

    Value Addition

    Key Concepts

    1. Gender Parity Index (GPI): Ratio of female-to-male values in education indicators; India has achieved near-parity in enrolment but lags in investment equity.
    2. Human Capital Theory: Education as an investment leading to productivity and growth; unequal spending weakens women’s contribution to the economy.
    3. Intersectionality: Gender bias in expenditure intersects with class, caste, and rural-urban divides, amplifying inequalities.

    Data and Reports

    1. National Sample Survey (2024): Reveals consistent gaps in household expenditure on girls’ education across stages and regions.
    2. World Economic Forum Gender Gap Report (2024): India slipped in rankings, with education a major drag despite enrolment progress.
    3. ASER Report (Annual Status of Education Report): Points to quality issues in rural schools, often affecting girls disproportionately.
    4. UNESCO (Global Education Monitoring Report, 2023): Highlights that globally, girls are more likely to be excluded from secondary and higher education due to cost factors.

    Government Policies and Schemes

    1. National Education Policy (NEP) 2020: Emphasises inclusive, equitable education and gender-sensitive curricula.
    2. Beti Bachao, Beti Padhao (2015): Social mobilisation for improving girls’ survival, protection, and education.
    3. National Scheme of Incentives to Girls for Secondary Education (NSIGSE): Financial support to reduce dropouts.
    4. Kasturba Gandhi Balika Vidyalaya (KGBV): Residential schooling for disadvantaged girls in Classes 6–12.

    Comparative International Experience

    1. Bangladesh: Successful in reducing gender disparity through stipend schemes for girls, free textbooks, and subsidies—leading to higher female enrolment in secondary education.
    2. Nordic Countries (Sweden, Norway, Finland): Achieved near-complete gender equity in education by ensuring free schooling, universal childcare, and strong social security systems that reduce household bias.
    3. Rwanda: Introduced Gender-Responsive Budgeting—allocating funds specifically to address gender gaps in education, which India can emulate.

    Quotes (Useful for Essay/Ethics/GS answers)

    1. “If you educate a man you educate an individual, but if you educate a woman you educate a family.” — Charles M. Cooper
    2. “Investment in girls’ education is not charity, it is the smartest investment a country can make.” — UN Secretary-General António Guterres

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2022] The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 remains inadequate in promoting incentive-based system for children’s education without generating awareness about the importance of schooling. Analyse.

    Linkage: The NSS 80th round shows families spend 18–30% more on boys than girls, privileging them in private schools and coaching despite RTE’s universal access. This proves that incentive-based provisions under the RTE Act remain inadequate without tackling deep-rooted gender norms. Hence, awareness generation, gender-responsive budgeting, and social mobilisation are essential complements to legal entitlements.

  • In news: Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan

    Why in the News?

    The Supreme Court intervened after Tamil Nadu faced ₹3,000+ crore reimbursements to private schools for economically disadvantaged students’ admissions, as the Centre declined to share costs under Samagra Shiksha.

    About Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan:

    • Launch & Integration: Started in 2018 (by then Ministry of HRD), integrating Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA), Rashtriya Madhyamik Shiksha Abhiyan (RMSA), and Teacher Education (TE) into one holistic programme.
    • Benchmark Feature: Treats schooling as a continuous system from pre-primary to Class XII (ages 4–18), removing silos.
    • Funding Pattern: A Centrally Sponsored Scheme (CSS) with Centre–State sharing (60:40, 90:10 for NE/hilly states), implemented via a single State Implementation Society (SIS).
    • Policy Alignment: Aligned with NEP 2020 and UN SDG-4 (quality education).
    • Coverage: 1.16 million schools, 156+ million students, 5.7 million teachers across government & aided institutions.
    • Upgraded Phase: Samagra Shiksha 2.0 (2021–26) with focus on digital education, vocational training, FLN, and inclusion.

    Key Features of the Scheme:

    • Unified Structure: One umbrella for pre-primary to Class XII, ensuring coherent planning.
    • Teachers & Technology:
      • Continuous teacher training via SCERTs, DIETs, NISHTHA, SWAYAM.
      • Digital initiatives: DIKSHA, Operation Digital Board, ICT labs, smart classrooms, AI-based learning tools.
    • Foundational Literacy & Numeracy: NIPUN Bharat Mission (ages 3–9) for universal reading & numeracy.
    • Vocational & Skill Education: Subjects like coding, robotics, financial literacy, AI with 1000+ training centres (from Class VI).
    • Direct Benefit Transfers (DBT): Uniforms, textbooks, transport allowance directly credited via IT platforms.
    • Holistic Development: Integration of sports, physical education, self-defence, soft skills under Khelo India.
    • Funding Scale: Allocation crossed ₹41,000 crore (2025); nationwide coverage till March 2026 under Samagra Shiksha 2.0.
    [UPSC 2017] What is the aim of the programme ‘Unnat Bharat Abhiyan’?

    Options: (a) Achieving 100% literacy by promoting collaboration between voluntary organizations and government’s education system and local communities.

    (b) Connecting institutions of higher education with local communities to address development challenges through appropriate technologies. *

    (c) Strengthening India’s scientific research institutions in order to make India a scientific and technological Power.

    (d) Developing human capital by allocating special funds for health-care and education of rural and urban poor, and organizing skill development programmes and vocational training for them.

     

  • Detoxifying India’s entrance examination system

    Introduction

    Entrance examinations in India were envisioned as a filter for talent, ensuring merit-based access to elite institutions. However, over time, they have morphed into an industry-driven rat race. From ₹7 lakh coaching fees to student suicides, the costs are both economic and human. With growing disparities in access, an illusory notion of meritocracy, and mounting psychological toll, rethinking admissions is not a choice but a necessity.

    The Coaching Crisis and Its Toll

    1. Massive Aspirant Pool: Over 15 lakh students appear for JEE alone, making coaching almost unavoidable.
    2. High Costs: Coaching fees of ₹6–7 lakh for two years price out poor students.
    3. Early Sacrifices: Students as young as 14 years study Irodov & Krotov (beyond B.Tech level), sacrificing holistic growth.
    4. Mental Health Crisis: Rising stress, depression, alienation; some governments now regulate coaching centres.
    5. Core Issue: The examination system itself is flawed, creating overqualified candidates and distorted merit.

    Why Meritocracy is an Illusion

    1. Tiny Differences, Big Stakes: Distinguishing between 91% vs 97% in Class 12, or 99.9 percentile in JEE is unreasonable.
    2. Adequate Benchmark Exists: A 70–80% score in Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics is sufficient for B.Tech readiness.
    3. False Hierarchies: Overemphasis on marginal score differences creates elitism and exclusion.
    4. Privilege Bias: Wealthier families access top coaching, creating an illusory meritocracy.
    5. Philosophical Insight: Harvard’s Michael Sandel critiques meritocratic obsession, proposing lotteries for elite admissions.

    Global Inspirations for Reform

    1. Dutch Lottery System:
      • Introduced in 1972, reinstated in 2023 for medical school.
      • Weighted lottery: minimum eligibility required, higher grades = higher chances.
      • Promotes diversity, fairness, and reduced pressure.
    2. China’s “Double Reduction Policy” (2021):
      • Banned for-profit coaching overnight.
      • Reduced financial burden and youth stress.
      • Addressed unchecked growth of the coaching industry.

    Proposed Solutions for India

    1. Lottery-based Allocation:
      • Threshold of 80% in PCM for eligibility.
      • Weighted lottery with categories (90%+, 80–90%): A weighted lottery with categories (90%+, 80–90%) means all eligible students enter a lottery, but those with higher marks get proportionally better chances of selection.
      • Reservations integrated (gender, rural, region).
    2. Rural Empowerment: 50% IIT seats for rural govt school students to promote social mobility.
    3. Coaching Reform: Ban/nationalise coaching, provide free online lectures & study material.
    4. Diversity & Integration: Student exchange between IITs to break hierarchies.
    5. Faculty transfers to standardise academic quality.

    Conclusion

    India’s choice is stark: continue a toxic rat race that scars its brightest minds, or embrace a fair, equitable system that nurtures youth. Scrapping or reforming entrance exams through lotteries, trust in Class 12 boards, rural reservations, and coaching reforms can detoxify the system. The aim must not only be producing engineers and doctors but ensuring the emotional, social, and moral growth of India’s future citizens.

    Value Addition

    Committee Recommendations & Policy Inputs

    • Radhakrishnan Commission (1948–49) – Stressed on reducing rote-based entrance exams and aligning admissions with broader educational goals.
    • Kothari Commission (1964–66) – Recommended a common school system to minimise disparities in access, echoing today’s concerns about coaching and inequality.
    • National Knowledge Commission (2005) – Suggested multiple modes of testing and reducing dependence on a single high-stakes exam.
    • Yashpal Committee (2009) – Criticised the “overburden of entrance exams” and highlighted the need for a more holistic, less mechanical admission process.
    • NEP 2020 – Calls for a holistic and flexible education system, moving away from rote-based, high-pressure exams towards fairer assessment models.

    PYQ Relevance

    [UPSC 2024] What are the aims and objectives of the recently passed and enforced, The Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024? Whether University/State Education Board examinations, too, are covered under the Act?

    Linkage: The Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024 seeks to curb frauds like paper leaks and impersonation to restore exam credibility. The article extends this concern by highlighting systemic unfairness — coaching dependence, stress, and privilege-driven access. Together, they underline that ensuring fairness in exams requires not just legal safeguards but also structural reforms in India’s entrance system.

  • [29th August 2025] The Hindu Op-ed: India’s demographic dividend as a time bomb

    Mentor’s Comment

    India’s celebrated demographic dividend, once viewed as a sure path to prosperity, is at risk of turning into a demographic time bomb. The article highlights how an outdated education system, misaligned curricula, lack of skilling, and the AI-driven disruption are threatening the employability of millions of young Indians. With over 800 million citizens below 35, the stakes are immense: India’s future growth, social stability, and global aspirations hinge on whether this youth bulge is transformed into an asset or left to fester as a liability.

    Introduction

    Demographic dividend refers to the economic growth potential that arises when a country has a larger share of its population in the working-age group compared to dependents. It is essentially the window of opportunity where youth can drive productivity, innovation, and national prosperity. India today stands at such a pivotal moment, with more than half of its population below the age of 35. This unprecedented youth bulge offers a chance to accelerate growth, but whether it becomes a dividend or a disaster depends entirely on how well the country equips its people with education, skills, and employability.

    The scale of India’s demographic challenge

    1. Youth bulge: Over 800 million people under 35, one of the world’s largest youth populations.
    2. Graduate glut: India produces millions of graduates annually, but many remain underemployed or unemployable.
    3. Engineering crisis: 40–50% of engineering graduates in the last decade were not placed in jobs.
    4. Employability gap: According to Mercer-Mettl (2025), only 43% of graduates are job-ready.

    The impact of Artificial Intelligence on jobs and employability

    1. Automation threat: McKinsey projects 70% of jobs in India could be impacted by automation by 2030.
    2. Task replacement: Nearly 30% of current job tasks will be automated globally.
    3. Job churn: World Economic Forum (WEF) predicts 170 million new jobs by 2030, but 92 million displaced in the same period.
    4. Urgency: India’s curriculum runs on 3-year cycles, too slow compared to fast-moving technology disruptions.

    The roots of the education–employment mismatch in schools

    1. Career ignorance: 93% of students (Classes 8–12) are aware of only 7 traditional careers (doctor, engineer, lawyer, teacher).
    2. Career options: The modern economy offers 20,000+ career paths.
    3. Guidance gap: Only 7% of students receive formal career guidance.
    4. Wrong fit: 65% of high school graduates pursue degrees not aligned with their aptitude or market demand.

    The shortcomings of India’s skilling missions

    1. Skill India shortfall: Aimed to train 400 million individuals by 2022, but fell short.
    2. Fragmented approach: Policies such as Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana (PMKVY), Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Kendras (PMKK), Jan Shikshan Sansthan (JSS), Pradhan Mantri Yuva Yojana (PMYY), Skills Acquisition and Knowledge Awareness for Livelihood Promotion (SANKALP), and the Prime Minister’s Internship Scheme have been launched, but they often function in silos without effective integration.
    3. Funding without impact: Large-scale spending has not yielded industry-ready graduates.
    4. Need of the hour: Cohesive, industry-aligned national skilling strategy.

    The risks of neglecting the demographic crisis

    1. Economic setback: Risk of educated but unemployable workforce undermining India’s growth.
    2. Social unrest: Historical precedent in the Mandal protests of 1990, where youth frustration erupted violently.
    3. Paradox at scale: As Lant Pritchett noted in Where Has All the Education Gone?, mere schooling without employability worsens the crisis.
    4. Civilizational risk: The crisis is not just about jobs, but about the social contract between state and youth.

    Conclusion

    India stands at a crossroads. The very youth once seen as its greatest strength may become its Achilles’ heel if the education–employment gap remains unaddressed. The AI revolution makes this transition even more urgent. With the right mix of foresight, reforms, and collaboration between government, private sector, and academia, India can convert its youth bulge into a global competitive advantage. The clock is ticking, the dividend must be harnessed before it explodes into a time bomb.

    PYQ Linkage

    [UPSC 2016] “Demographic Dividend in India will remain only theoretical unless our manpower becomes more educated, aware, skilled and creative.” What measures have been taken by the government to enhance the capacity of our population to be more productive and employable?

    Linkage: The question emphasizes that India’s demographic dividend will remain theoretical without real improvements in education, awareness, skills, and creativity. This connects with the fact that, despite schemes like Skill India Mission, PMKVY, NEP 2020 and SANKALP, a large share of graduates remain unemployable — with only 43% job-ready and 40–50% of engineering graduates jobless — underscoring the urgent need for aligning skilling with industry demands.

  • Building health for 1.4 billion Indians

    Introduction

    India’s health care is at a defining juncture, balancing between privilege and universal right. The system must simultaneously expand access for millions who remain underserved while ensuring affordability in an era of rising costs. This requires a systemic framework, strengthening insurance, leveraging efficiency, embedding prevention, accelerating digital health adoption, and ensuring regulatory trust. If successful, India can set a global benchmark for inclusive, financially viable, and aspirational health care.

    India’s Health Care at an Inflection Point

    1. Dual challenge: Expanding access to underserved populations while making care affordable amid rising costs.
    2. Low insurance penetration: Only 15–18% of Indians are insured compared to global standards.
    3. Huge opportunity: Premium-to-GDP ratio at 3.7% vs global 7%, indicating scope for rapid growth.
    4. Global benchmark potential: India has already demonstrated how high-quality care at scale is possible, an MRI machine in India handles multiple times the scans compared to Western systems.

    Insurance as the Foundation of Affordability

    1. Pooling risk: Even modest premiums (₹5,000–₹20,000 for individuals) can cover several lakhs of treatment.
    2. Current gap: India’s gross written premiums stood at $15 billion in 2024, projected to grow at 20% CAGR till 2030.
    3. Ayushman Bharat success: Covers 500 million people with ₹5 lakh per family; led to a 90% rise in timely cancer treatments.
    4. Challenge: Expanding private hospital participation requires fair reimbursements and transparency.

    Prevention as the Strongest Cost-Saver

    1. Outpatient costs crisis: Punjab study showed even insured families faced catastrophic expenses for Non-Communicable Diseases (NCD) outpatient care.
    2. Redesign needed: Insurance must include outpatient + diagnostics.
    3. People’s role: Preventive mindset across schools, employers, and communities is essential.
    4. Economic benefit: Every rupee invested in healthier lifestyles saves multiples in treatment costs.

    Digital Health and AI for Democratising Access

    1. Early adoption: India pioneered telemedicine and now uses AI for sepsis detection, diagnostic triage, remote consultations.
    2. Bridging gaps: Specialists in metros can guide treatments in remote villages hundreds of km away.
    3. Continuity of care: The Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission aims for universal health records accessible nationwide.

    Regulation and Trust as the Missing Links

    1. Cost pressures: Insurers may hike premiums 10–15% due to pollution-related illnesses.
    2. Trust deficit: Without confidence in fair claims and grievance redressal, households avoid insurance.
    3. Government push: Finance Ministry has urged Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) to strengthen claims settlement and consumer protection.
    4. Capital skew: In 2023, health sector drew $5.5 billion in private equity and venture capital investment (PE/VC investment), but mostly in metros, tier-2 and 3 remain underserved.

    Conclusion

    India’s health care future will be shaped by its ability to marry efficiency with equity, technology with trust, and prevention with cure. Insurance must evolve to cover everyday health needs, providers must expand beyond metros, and digital tools must bridge rural-urban divides. With bold public-private partnerships and strong regulation, India can make health care not a privilege but a fundamental right and a global model for inclusive growth.

    PYQ Relevance

    [ UPSC 2015] Public health system has limitations in providing universal health coverage. Do you think that the private sector could help in bridging the gap? What other viable alternatives would you suggest?

    Linkage: The article shows that while India’s public health system has expanded through PM-JAY, universal coverage is still limited by low insurance penetration (15–18%) and uneven rural access, reflecting the very limitations highlighted in the PYQ. It also stresses that private sector participation, anchored in fair reimbursements and transparent processes, is essential to bridge the gap, especially in tier-2 and tier-3 cities. Further, it suggests viable alternatives such as preventive health campaigns, digital health innovations, and public-private partnerships to make health care inclusive and affordable.