💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

GS Paper: GS2-13.Issues relating to development and management of Social Sector/Services relating to Health, Education, Human Resources.

  • Vinesh Phogat’s Olympics disqualification     

    Why in the News?

    Wrestler Vinesh Phogat was disqualified from the Paris Olympics after the official weigh-in on Wednesday morning, before her scheduled gold medal bout in the evening, leaving her without a medal.

    What is Weight Cutting?

    • Weight cutting is the process by which athletes systematically reduce their body weight before a competition. This typically involves a combination of dietary restrictions and intensive physical activity aimed at shedding a specific amount of weight, often over a period of weeks leading up to the event.
    • Wrestlers often employ extreme measures such as skipping meals, limiting water intake, and engaging in intense exercise, including sauna sessions and wearing heavy clothing to promote sweating. This can lead to rapid weight loss primarily through fluid loss.

    Why Do Combat Athletes Cut Weight?

    • Combat sports like wrestling, boxing, and mixed martial arts (MMA) are organized by weight classes to ensure fair competition. Athletes aim to compete in lower weight classes to gain a size and strength advantage over their opponents, as they can often regain weight after the weigh-in.
    • By cutting weight, athletes believe they can compete against opponents who are lighter and potentially less strong, thus increasing their chances of success in the competition.

    Should Weight Cutting Be Banned?

    • The practice of weight cutting poses significant health risks, including dehydration, electrolyte imbalances, and energy depletion, which can impair performance and lead to serious medical issues. Athletes may experience severe fatigue and reduced physical capabilities after extreme weight cuts.
    • There is an ongoing debate about whether weight cutting should be banned or regulated more strictly. Critics argue that the health risks outweigh the competitive advantages, while supporters maintain that it is a part of the sport’s culture and can be managed safely with proper guidance.
    • Some suggest that instead of banning weight cutting, sports organizations should implement better regulations and educate athletes about safe practices for weight management, including gradual weight loss and hydration strategies.

    Way forward: 

    • Implement Hydration Testing: Regular hydration tests can prevent severe dehydration, ensuring athletes remain within safe hydration levels.
    • Weight Class Monitoring: Monitor athletes’ weight throughout the training period to discourage rapid weight loss just before competition.
    • Set Minimum Weight Limits: Establish minimum weight thresholds based on athletes’ natural body weight to prevent extreme weight cuts.

    Mains PYQ:

    Q An athlete participates in the Olympics for personal triumph and the nation’s glory; victors are showered with cash incentives by various agencies, on their return. Discuss the merit of state-sponsored talent hunt and its cultivation as against the rationale of a reward mechanism as encouragement. (UPSC IAS/2014)

  • Court shifts the tide on stray dog policy  

    Why in the news?

    The Supreme Court ended the 15-year-old (Animal Welfare Board of India & Anr Versus People for Elimination of Stray Troubles & Ors) AWBI vs. PEST case on July 12, after the final hearing on May 9, sparking mixed reactions.

    The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (PCA) Act, 1960, and the Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules are:

    • The PCA Act, 1960 was enacted by the Parliament of India to prevent the infliction of unnecessary pain or suffering on animals and to amend the laws relating to the prevention of cruelty to animals.
      • The PCA Act, 1960 and ABC Rules, 2001 prohibit the killing of stray dogs and mandate sterilization as the only scientific and humane method of controlling stray dog populations.
      • The new ABC Rules, 2023 notified under the PCA Act, 1960 also prohibit wanton killing of stray dogs by municipalities and require them to follow sterilization.
    • The Act defines “animal” as any living creature other than a human being. It establishes the Animal Welfare Board of India to promote animal welfare.
    • Chapter III of the Act lists different forms of cruelty to animals that are banned, including those related to work animals, captivity, ownership, abuse, mutilation or killing.
    • Chapter IV deals with experiments on animals. While it does not make experiments unlawful for the advancement of knowledge, it allows the Board to advise the government to create a committee to control and supervise such experiments.
    • Chapter V outlines restrictions, procedures and offences related to performing animals. The Central Government can prohibit any animal from exhibition or training through notification.

    Note: In 2022, the Ministry of Fisheries, Animal Husbandry and Dairying submitted a draft Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Amendment) Bill 2022 for public comment. The draft includes 61 amendments to further clarify the law and make punishments more stringent.

    The Supreme Court stated that the Central law (PCA Act 1960 and ABC Rules, 2023) which prohibits killing of stray dogs by local authorities remains the governing law of the land.

    What the Supreme Court said on the ‘Duty of every Citizen’:

    • The Supreme Court capped off the judgment with the lines: “Compassion to all living beings, is the enshrined Constitutional value and mandate, and cast obligation on the authorities to maintain.”
      • This refers to Article 51A(g) of the Constitution of India which states: “It shall be the duty of every citizen of India to protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers, and wildlife and to have compassion for living creatures.”
    • The court emphasized that Citizens should avoid unscientific and cruel methods like killing stray dogs and instead choose the scientific and humane method of sterilization.

    Issues due to stray dogs in India: 

    • Population: India has an estimated 60 million stray dogs, making it the country with the highest number of stray dogs globally.
    • Rabies Incidence: India accounts for 36% of global rabies deaths and 65% of rabies deaths in the South-East Asia region.
      • Between 2012 and 2022, the National Rabies Control Program reported 6,644 clinically suspected cases of rabies in humans.
    • Dog Bite Cases: Reports indicate that major cities have seen alarming numbers of dog bite incidents. For example, Delhi’s Safdarjung Hospital and Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital recorded nearly 48,000 dog bite cases in just six months. In Kerala alone, there were over 1.9 lakh dog bite cases last year, with 21 deaths attributed to rabies.

    Way forward:

    • Enhanced Public Awareness and Education: Need to implement nationwide campaigns to educate the public on responsible pet ownership, the importance of sterilization, and the humane treatment of stray dogs.
    • Strengthening Enforcement of Existing Laws: Need to ensure that municipalities and local authorities are adequately trained and funded to implement the ABC Rules effectively.
  • [5th August 2024] The Hindu Op-ed: The psychology of extravagance

    [5th August 2024] The Hindu Op-ed: The psychology of extravagance

    PYQ Relevance:

    Mains:

    Q1 Critically discuss the objectives of Bhoodan and Gramdan movements initiated by Acharya Vinoba Bhave and their success.  (UPSC IAS/2013) 

    Q2 Can the vicious cycle of gender inequality, poverty and malnutrition be broken through microfinancing of women SHGs? Explain with examples.  (UPSC IAS/2021) 

    Note4Students: 

    Mains: Reason behind the inequality in India ;

    Mentor comments: Inequality in India is characterized by significant disparities in wealth and income distribution. The richest 1% of the population owns over 58% of the nation’s wealth, while the bottom 50% holds merely 3%. Factors contributing to this inequality include caste, gender, and regional disparities. Women, for instance, earn 34% less than men and own only 2% of agricultural land despite comprising 42% of the agricultural workforce. The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated these inequalities, with the wealth of billionaires increasing while poverty deepened for many.

    Let’s learn!

    __

    Why in the News? 

    In their March 2024 study, “Income and Wealth Inequality in India, 1922-2023: The Rise of the Billionaire Raj,” economists Nitin Kumar Bharti, Lucas Chancel, Thomas Piketty, and Anmol Somanchi report that in 2022-23, the top 1% of the population held 22.6% of the total income and 40.1% of the total wealth in India.

    A case of gross disproportion as per study

    • Income and Wealth Distribution: In 2022-23, the top 1% of India’s population received 22.6% of national income and owned 40.1% of total wealth. This marks the highest levels of inequality recorded since 1961, indicating a stark concentration of wealth among the richest individuals, with the top 0.1% earning nearly 10% of national income.
    • Comparison with Historical Context: The report suggests that the current inequality levels are greater than those during the British colonial rule, with the top 10% of the population owning 65% of total wealth. In contrast, the bottom 50% holds only 6.4% of total wealth and earns 15% of national income.
    • Wealth of the Wealthy: The wealthiest 10,000 individuals possess an average of ₹22.6 billion, which is approximately 16,763 times the average wealth of an Indian.  
    • Start of inequality: The rise in inequality began in the 1980s with economic liberalization, accelerating after the 1991 reforms. The share of the bottom 50% in national income dropped significantly, while the income share of the top 10% increased dramatically during the same period.

    The reason behind the inequality: 

    • Economic Liberalization: The economic reforms initiated in the 1990s led to rapid growth in certain sectors, particularly in urban areas, while rural and less developed regions lagged behind.  
    • Lack of Inclusive Growth: Economic growth has not been inclusive, with benefits disproportionately favouring certain sectors and geographic regions. For instance, the service sector, which significantly contributes to GDP, is concentrated in a few states like Maharashtra and Karnataka.
    • High Unemployment and Underemployment: A lack of sufficient job creation and the prevalence of underemployment contribute to low productivity and income levels among the majority of the population
    • Caste and Gender Discrimination: Social stratification based on caste and gender continues to limit access to opportunities for marginalized groups. For example, upper castes hold a disproportionate share of wealth, while Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes have significantly lower ownership of assets.
    • Educational Disparities: Access to quality education is uneven, with lower-income groups often lacking the resources to attain higher education, which is crucial for upward mobility. This educational gap perpetuates income inequality.
    • Regional Imbalances: Certain states in India are significantly more developed than others, leading to disparities in income and wealth distribution. For instance, five states own about 50% of the country’s total wealth, Maharashtra (17% of the country’s wealth share) Uttar Pradesh (11.6%), Kerala (7.4%), Tamil Nadu and Haryana

    Way forward

    • Redistribution of Wealth: The funds generated from increased taxation should be directed towards social programs that improve access to education, healthcare, and nutrition for lower-income groups. 
    • Invest in Rural Development: Need to focus on targeted investments in rural areas which can help bridge the gap between urban and rural economies.
    • Promote Quality Education and Skill Development: Expanding access to quality education and vocational training for marginalized communities can empower individuals and enhance their employability.

  • [pib] Update on Pradhan Mantri Surakshit Matritva Abhiyan (PMSMA)

    Why in the News?

    • An Extended Pradhan Mantri Surakshit Matritva Abhiyan (E-PMSMA) strategy was launched to ensure quality Antenatal Care (ANC) for pregnant women.
      • The strategy focuses on individual tracking of high-risk pregnancies (HRP) and provision of additional PMSMA sessions beyond the 9th of every month.

    About High-Risk Pregnancy: 

    • A high-risk pregnancy involves greater risk of health complications for the mother, the foetus, or both, due to pre-existing medical conditions, conditions that develop during pregnancy, or foetal issues.
    • Common Factors:
      • Maternal Health Conditions: Pre-existing diabetes, hypertension, HIV, kidney disease, or conditions arising during pregnancy like gestational diabetes and preeclampsia.
      • Obstetric Factors: Previous caesarean section, history of preterm labor, multiple pregnancies, and congenital malformations.

    About Pradhan Mantri Surakshit Matritva Abhiyan (PMSMA)

    Details
    About An initiative to provide quality antenatal care (ANC) to all pregnant women.
    Launch  October 2016
    Target Group All pregnant women, especially those in their second and third trimesters.
    Frequency Services provided on the 9th of every month at government health facilities.
    Objective Ensure safe motherhood by providing comprehensive and quality antenatal care universally.
    Key Functions
    • General Check-Up: Physical and clinical examinations by medical professionals.
    • Laboratory Investigations: Routine blood tests, urine tests, and other necessary laboratory investigations.
    • Ultrasound: Ultrasound examination to monitor foetal growth and development.
    • Counseling: Nutritional and lifestyle counseling to ensure a healthy pregnancy.
    • High-Risk Identification: Screening and identification of high-risk pregnancies and appropriate referrals for specialized care.
    Key Features
    • Free of Cost: All services under PMSMA are provided free of cost.
    • Fixed Day ANC Services: Antenatal care services are provided on a fixed day every month.
    • Lab Investigations: Basic investigations like Hb, urine albumin, RBS, malaria test, VDRL test, blood grouping, CBC, ESR, and USG.
    • Public-Private Partnership: Encourages participation of private sector healthcare providers in providing ANC services.
    • Incentives: Incentives for healthcare providers who participate in the program.
    Categorization of Pregnant Women 
    • Green Sticker – for women with no risk factor detected
    • Red Sticker – for women with high risk pregnancy
    • Blue Sticker – for women with Pregnancy Induced Hypertension
    • Yellow Sticker – pregnancy with co-morbid conditions such as diabetes, hypothyroidism, STIs
    Benefits
    • Improved Maternal Health: Regular and comprehensive ANC helps in early detection and management of complications, improving maternal health outcomes.
    • Reduced Mortality Rates: Timely and quality care reduces maternal and infant mortality rates.
    • Health Education: Provides health education and counseling to pregnant women, promoting better health practices.
    • High-Risk Management: Identifies and manages high-risk pregnancies effectively, ensuring specialized care for those who need it.

    PYQ:

    [2024]  With reference to the ‘Pradhan Mantri Surakshit Matritva Abhiyan’, consider the following statements:

    1. This scheme guarantees a minimum package of antenatal care services to women in their second and third trimesters of pregnancy and six months post-delivery health care service in any government health facility.

    2. Under this scheme, private sector health care providers of certain specialities can volunteer to provide services at nearby government health facilities.

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    (a) 1 only

    (b) 2 only

    (c) Both 1 and 2

    (d) Neither 1 nor 2

  • Why SC couldn’t agree on the environmental release of GM mustard? 

    Why in the news?

    A two-judge Bench of the Supreme Court delivered a split verdict on Tuesday, July 23, regarding the “environmental release” of Genetically Modified (GM) mustard.

    About GM Mustard Crop 

    • Development and Approval Process: On September 15, 2015, the Centre for Genetic Manipulation of Crop Plants (CGMCP) at Delhi University sought approval from the Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC) for the environmental release of GM mustard DMH-11.
    • Biosafety Dossier: The CGMCP submitted a biosafety dossier to the GEAC, which created a sub-committee to examine its contents. After revisions, the sub-committee submitted its report, inviting comments in September 2016.
    • GEAC Recommendations: On May 11, 2017, the GEAC recommended the environmental release of GM mustard, allowing field tests to assess the crop’s effects. However, the Ministry of Environment sent the proposal back for re-examination in March 2018 after receiving several representations.
    • Deferred Tests: The GEAC directed the CGMCP to examine the effects of GM mustard on honey bees and soil microbial diversity, but these tests were deferred through 2020-21.
      • The GEAC-appointed expert committee found that honeybees do not discriminate between other GM crops such as genetically engineered canola.

    What is the case before the Supreme Court?

    • Background of the Case: The case arose from challenges by environmentalist Aruna Rodrigues and the organization Gene Campaign against the GEAC’s approval for the environmental release of GM mustard, arguing that the decision violated the precautionary principle and lacked proper scientific scrutiny.
    • Split Verdict: The Supreme Court delivered a split verdict regarding the approval for the environmental release of genetically modified (GM) mustard, specifically the hybrid DMH-11. Justices B.V. Nagarathna and Sanjay Karol had differing opinions on the legality of the Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee’s (GEAC) decision-making process.
    • Justice Nagarathna’s Opinion: Justice Nagarathna held that the GEAC’s approval was flawed and did not follow the necessary procedures, particularly failing to conduct promised field tests. She emphasized that the approval violated public trust and the precautionary principle, which is essential for protecting the environment and public health.
    • Justice Karol’s Opinion: In contrast, Justice Karol argued that the GEAC’s decision was valid and aligned with the development of scientific temper. He stated that field trials are necessary to assess the environmental safety of GM mustard and that the decision-making process was independent and reasoned.
    • Unanimous Directives: Despite the split decision, both judges agreed on the need for the Union government to formulate a national policy regarding GM crops. This policy should involve consultations with various stakeholders, including experts, farmers, and state governments.
    • Case referred to larger bench: The case will be referred to a larger bench for further adjudication due to the differing opinions. The Supreme Court directed that the Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) should conduct a national consultation within four months to develop this policy.
    • Concerns Raised: Justice Nagarathna pointed out that the GEAC did not consider the long-term effects of GM mustard on health and the environment, while Justice Karol noted the importance of conducting field trials under strict safeguards to monitor the crop’s impact.

    Conclusion: The Union government should formulate a detailed and inclusive national policy on genetically modified crops. This policy should be based on extensive consultations with experts, farmer representatives, state governments, and other stakeholders to ensure a balanced approach that considers scientific, environmental, and public health perspectives.

    Mains PYQ: 

    Q  What are the present challenges before crop diversification? How do emerging technologies provide an opportunity for crop diversification? (2021)

  • A Budget that places health on the margins

    Why in the news?

    • With the worst of the COVID-19 pandemic behind us (though the World Health Organization warns the virus still lingers), the Union Budget shifted focus to economic growth levers like infrastructure and employment.
    • It was also hoped that recognizing population health as crucial for economic growth would lead to continued investment in strengthening health systems.
    A budget estimate refers to the initial allocation of funds designated for various programs, departments, or projects within a fiscal year. It represents the government’s expectations regarding how much money will be required to meet planned expenditures.

    In contrast, revised estimates come into play later in the fiscal year. After assessing the actual expenditures and needs after the first six months, the government may adjust the initial budget estimates based on how much of the allocated funds have been utilised and what additional resources may be necessary.

    Comparisons with Previous Years

    • Budgetary Estimates: The comparison of the Budget Estimates (BE) for health between 2023-24 and 2025-25, reveals minimal increases:
      • Overall Health Ministry Budget: 1.98% increase
      • National Health Mission (NHM): 1.16% increase
      • PMJAY: 1.4% increase
    • Overall Health Ministry budget: The present allocation made in the current Budget is deemed to be inadequate for expanding health coverage services and enhancing the impact of flagship health programs, particularly in light of rising non-communicable diseases and the goal of universal health coverage by 2030.
    • Misleading Comparisons: When we compare the Budget estimates with the previous Revised estimates (RE) the budgetary increase of nearly 12% is misleading, as the RE reflects actual spending rather than the program’s needs.

    Missed Opportunities

    • Health Workforce Development: While the budget mentioned an increase in new medical colleges, it failed to address the critical need for a multi-layered, multi-skilled health workforce.
    • Drug Pricing Mechanisms: Although customs duties were waived on three anti-cancer drugs. However, the budget missed the chance to implement price controls and pooled procurement strategies that could have lowered drug costs across both public and private healthcare sectors. Establishing such mechanisms could enhance the affordability and accessibility of essential medications.
    • Climate-Resilient Agriculture: While the budget committed to climate-resilient agriculture, which is crucial for food security, it did not sufficiently link these efforts to health outcomes, such as nutrition and public health, which are critical in the context of rising health challenges.

    Challenges to the Inclusivity of PMJAY

    • Limited Coverage of Middle Class: PMJAY primarily targets the bottom 40% of the population based on economic status, leaving the middle class without coverage.
    • Focus on Secondary and Tertiary Care: The program emphasizes secondary and tertiary healthcare, often neglecting primary care services. This approach limits comprehensive health coverage and fails to address preventive healthcare needs, which are crucial for achieving UHC.
    • Awareness and Accessibility Issues: There is a significant disparity in awareness and accessibility of PMJAY across states.
      • For example, awareness is notably higher in Tamil Nadu (80%) compared to Bihar (20%). 

    Way forward: 

    • Targeted Funding for Flagship Programs: Need to allocate a more substantial increase in the budget for the National Health Mission (NHM) and Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PMJAY) to the eradication of non-communicable diseases, tuberculosis elimination by 2025.
    • Strengthen Primary Healthcare: Govt. should ensure adequate funding for primary healthcare services, which form the foundation for preventive and community health initiatives.

    Mains PYQ:

    Q The public health system has limitations in providing universal health coverage. Do you think that the private sector can help in bridging the gap? What other viable alternatives do you suggest? (2015)

  • Food Colorants and Chemical Additives Under Crackdown in Karnataka

    Why in the News?

    Karnataka’s Food Safety Department ordered action after 40 kebab samples showed unsafe artificial colours, extending the crackdown to Panipuri, Cotton candy, and Gobi Manchurian.

    Artificial Colours in the Controversy 

    • Some artificial colours under scrutiny include:
    1. Sunset Yellow (Yellow 6, E110): Approved in the US but requires a warning label in the EU.
    2. Carmoisine (Red No. 10, E122): A deep red dye often used in food.
    3. Rhodamine B: A banned textile dye sometimes illegally used in food.
    • Different countries have varying regulations for these dyes. For example, tartrazine (E102 in the EU, Yellow 5 in the US) is permitted but only in limited quantities. 

     

    Legal Action against FBOs

    • To take legal action, the department collects a survey sample from an FBO and, if found unsafe, collects four more legal samples for further testing at the Central Food Technological Research Institute (CFTRI).
    • If CFTRI deems the samples unfit for consumption, the FBO is booked under the Food Safety Act and tried at a court of Judicial Magistrate of First Class (JMFC). Penalties can include a fine of up to Rs 10 lakh and imprisonment for 7 years.

    Role of FSSAI in Food Safety and Colorants Regulation

    • The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) plays a crucial role in regulating and ensuring food safety across the country under the Food Safety & Standards Act, 2006. 

    Ingredients legally banned in India by the FSSAI and various states initiatives:

    Parameters Details
    Ingredients Banned in India
    • Rhodamine B: A textile dye sometimes illegally used as a food colorant.
    • Potassium Bromate: A flour treatment agent linked to cancer.
    • Oxytocin: A hormone used unethically in the dairy industry to increase milk production.
    • Calcium Carbide: Used for ripening fruits, which is hazardous to health.
    • Formalin: Used in fish preservation, which is carcinogenic.
    • Brominated Vegetable Oil (BVO): Used in soft drinks, which is linked to various health issues.
    State Initiatives for Food Safety
    • Karnataka: Crackdown on use of unsafe food colorants in kebabs, pani puri, cotton candy, and gobi manchurian.
    • Maharashtra: Rigorous checks on milk adulteration and stringent actions against offenders.
    • Kerala: Implementation of ‘Safe Food’ campaign focusing on reducing pesticide use in vegetables.
    • Tamil Nadu: Regular inspections of street food vendors and training programs on food safety.
    • Delhi: Special drives to monitor and control the use of banned substances in sweets during festive seasons.

    State Food Safety Index (SFSI) by FSSAI sheds light on the performance of Indian states in ensuring food safety.

     

    PYQ:

    [2021] Elaborate the policy taken by the Government of India to meet the challenges of the food processing sector.

    [2018] Consider the following statements: 

    1. The Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 replaced the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.
    2. The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) is under the charge of Director General of Health Services in the Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    (a) 1 only
    (b) 2 only
    (c) Both 1 and 2
    (d) Neither 1 nor 2

     

  • NTA Reform Panel to Check Irregularities in Exams

    Why in the News?

    A seven-member high-level committee was constituted under the chairmanship of K. Radhakrishnan, former ISRO Chairman, by the Ministry of Education to reform the National Testing Agency (NTA).

    About National Testing Agency (NTA)

    • NTA is a premier, specialist, autonomous and self-sustained testing organization to conducts entrance examinations for admission/fellowship in higher educational institutions.
    • It was established in 2017 with a grant amount of Rs.25 crore from the Union Government.
    • NTA is responsible for conducting exams such as:
      • Joint Entrance Examination – Main (JEE Main)
      • National Eligibility cum Entrance Test-Undergraduate (NEET-UG) as well as NEET PG
      • National Eligibility Test (NET)
      • Common Management Admission Test (CMAT)
      • Graduate Pharmacy Aptitude Test (GPAT).
    • The NTA is chaired by an eminent educationist who will be appointed by the Ministry of Education.
    • There will be a Board of Governors comprising members from user institutions.

    National Testing Agency (NTA) Under Scrutiny

    • The NTA has been criticized after the NEET paper leak controversy and the subsequent scrapping of exams like UGC-NET due to “lack of integrity”.
    • The committee aims to establish a robust process for conducting various entrance examinations end to end.

    NTA Reform Panel: Committee Composition

    • Committee Head: K. Radhakrishnan, former Chairman of ISRO and Chairman of the Board of Governors at IIT-Kanpur.
    • Two-Month Timeline: The committee aims to meet ten times over the next two months to develop comprehensive recommendations.
    • Key Issues and Focus Areas:
      • Data Security Protocol: Develop a manual to fix a data security protocol to prevent question paper leaks.
      • Printing and Process Integrity: Review processes for printing question papers, onboarding printers, and training staff to minimize external participation.
      • Organisational Restructuring: Consider adding a data security vertical in the NTA organogram and implementing transparent processes, requiring organizational restructuring.
    • Examination Investigation and Security:
      • Root Cause Analysis: The committee will investigate the initial cause of question paper leaks to identify and plug gaps.
      • Modes of Examination: Examine different modes of conducting examinations:
    1. JEE (Mains) and JEE (Advanced) are computer-based tests.
    2. NEET-UG is conducted in pen-paper Optical Mark Recognition (OMR) mode.

    Challenges faced by NTA

    • Infrastructure Limitations: Currently, India lacks the infrastructure to conduct computer-based tests online for more than three lakh students simultaneously.
    • Large-Scale Exams: NEET-UG involves up to 24 lakh students appearing in pen and paper OMR mode at once.

    Conclusion

    • The reforms are critical to restoring the integrity of entrance examinations in India, ensuring secure and fair testing processes.
    • The committee’s recommendations will play a pivotal role in shaping the future operations of the NTA and entrance examination protocols.

    Back2Basic:  University Grants Commission (UGC)

    Details
    Establishment
    • Came into existence on 28th December, 1953.
    • Became a statutory organization by an Act of Parliament in 1956.
    Legislation The UGC Act, 1956.
    Nodal Ministry Ministry of Human Resource Development (now Ministry of Education).
    Responsibilities
    • Providing funds to universities and colleges.
    • Coordination, determination, and maintenance of standards of teaching, examination, and research in institutions of higher education.
    Mandate
    • Promoting and coordinating university education.
    • Determining and maintaining standards of teaching, examination, and research in universities.
    • Framing regulations on minimum standards of education.
    • Monitoring developments in collegiate and university education.
    • Disbursing grants to universities and colleges.
    • Serving as a link between the Union and state governments and institutions of higher learning.
    • Advising Central and State governments on measures necessary for the improvement of university education.
    Unique Distinction Only grant-giving agency in India with the dual role of funding and maintaining standards in higher education institutions.
    Functions
    • Promoting and coordinating university education.
    • Determining and maintaining standards of teaching, examination, and research in universities.
    • Framing regulations on minimum standards of education.
    • Monitoring developments in collegiate and university education.
    • Disbursing grants to universities and colleges.
    • Serving as a link between the Union and state governments and institutions of higher learning.
    • Advising Central and State governments on measures necessary for the improvement of university education.
    Link Role Acts as a vital link between Union and State governments and institutions of higher learning.
    Advisory Role Advises the Central and State governments on necessary measures for the improvement of university education.

  • The NEP debate: Why criticism of the policy is premature and off the mark?

    Why in the News?

    Opposition mainly comes from traditionalists who dislike markets, industrial experience, and internships. The NEP supports Ambedkar’s vision of education focused on employability for most Indians.

    About the National Education Policy (NEP)

    • The NEP was implemented in 2020, replacing the outdated NEP of 1986 after a delay of 34 years.
    • It aims to address the low employability of graduates by aligning education with the rapidly changing technological and industrial landscape.
    • It emphasizes a well-rounded education that includes in-depth knowledge, soft skills, technical skills, research capabilities, analytical and problem-solving abilities, and critical thinking.
    • The NEP shifts all programs towards outcome-based learning, with specified learning outcomes and corresponding assessments for each course.

    Why Criticism of the Policy is Premature and Off the Mark?

    • Early Stage of Implementation: Critics argue that it dilutes core content and burdens students and educators with bureaucratic requirements, but these criticisms are considered premature.
    • Continuous Task: Overhauling the vast education sector is a continuous task, and many concerns are over-emphasized.
    • University-Specific Issues: Much criticism centers around syllabus design and content, which is a university-specific issue and not a failure of the NEP.

    Provisions under NEP and Government Efforts

    • Credit-Based Courses: The NEP introduces credit-based courses, allowing for a flexible and multidisciplinary academic path.
    • Ability and Skill Enhancement Courses: These courses are designed to equip students with employability or entrepreneurial skills.
    • Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL): Students gaining industrial exposure related to their studies can earn credits through RPL, facilitating lifelong learning.
    • Revamped Curriculum and Syllabi: Emphasis on hands-on learning and continuous assessment through credited tutorials.
    • Internships and Practical Experiences: Integration of internships, apprenticeships, projects, and community outreach within degree programs.
    • Flexible Exit and Re-Entry: The NEP allows students to exit and re-enter programs, accommodating varied backgrounds and circumstances.

    Way Forward

    • Responsive Academia: Academia should be responsive to the requirements of the masses and markets, ensuring education is aligned with employability and industrial needs.
    • Continuous Feedback and Updates: Institutions should continuously update their programs based on feedback from stakeholders, following the example of successful adopters like Delhi University.
    • Long-Term Infrastructure Development: Realizing the full potential of the NEP requires long-term infrastructure development, which should be a sustained effort.

    Mains PYQ: 

    Q National Education Policy 2020 is in conformity with the Sustainable Development Goal-4 (2030). It intends to restructure and reorient the education system in India. Critically examine the statement. (UPSC IAS/2020) 

  • The allegations over NEET-UG 2024 | Explained

    Why in the news?

    On June 13, the Union government informed the Supreme Court that the scorecards of 1,563 candidates who received compensatory marks in the NEET-UG 2024 exam, held on May 5, will be cancelled.

    About National Testing Agency:

    • National Testing Agency (NTA) has been established as a premier, specialist, autonomous and self-sustained testing organization to conduct entrance examinations for admission/fellowship in higher educational institutions.
    • The NTA was established in 2017 by the Ministry of Education.
    • NTA is responsible for conducting the
      • Joint Entrance Examination – Main (JEE Main)
      • National Eligibility cum Entrance Test-Undergraduate (NEET-UG)
      • National Eligibility Test (NET)
      • Common Management Admission Test (CMAT)
      • Graduate Pharmacy Aptitude Test (GPAT).
    • The NTA is chaired by an eminent educationist who will be appointed by the Ministry of Education.

    Why has the Union government told the Supreme Court that it will cancel the scorecards of candidates who have been awarded grace marks?

    • Technical Issues During Exam: The cancellation stems from petitions challenging the award of grace marks to 1,563 candidates from six NEET centers due to technical issues that did not allow them the full 3.2 hours to complete the exam.
    • Compensatory Marks Controversy: Grace marks were awarded based on a court order and the recommendation of a committee constituted by the National Testing Agency (NTA). This move was challenged as arbitrary and lacking transparency.
    • Skewed Results: The committee found that the compensatory marks led to a skewed situation, thus recommending the cancellation of the scorecards for these candidates and conducting a re-test on June 23.

    How did the National Testing Agency respond to the various charges against the conduct of the exams?

    • Formation of Committee: In response to the allegations, the NTA constituted a four-member committee to investigate the truth behind the claims, including the award of grace marks and other issues related to the conduct of NEET 2024.
    • Admission of Irregularities: The NTA admitted that the grace marks caused confusion and contributed to skewed results. They acknowledged technical issues and the improper awarding of grace marks.
    • Panel Recommendations: The panel recommended limiting grace marks to the attempted questions and concluded that it would be best to cancel the test for the affected 1,563 students.
    • Explanations for High Scores: NTA officials attributed the unusually high number of perfect scores (67 students scoring 720/720) to an ‘easy paper’, but still took steps to address the fairness and validity of the results by planning a re-test.
    • Addressing Other Allegations: The NTA’s response included acknowledging various logistical issues such as slow distribution of question papers, wrong OMR sheets, and technical delays, and they aimed to ensure better planning and execution in future exams.

    Way forward: 

    • Calls for a Re-test for All Candidates: Students and education experts argue that if the exam can be cancelled for 1,563 candidates, it should be cancelled for all 23 lakh candidates to maintain fairness. They believe that the logical step is to conduct a re-test for everyone who took the May 5 exam.
    • Restoring Faith in the System: The dissatisfaction expressed on social media highlights a loss of faith in the examination system. To restore confidence, students demand comprehensive measures to address the flaws and ensure a fair and transparent testing process for all candidates.
    • Improving Examination Conduct: For an exam of NEET’s scale and history, it is expected that organizational issues should be resolved. The NTA and government agencies need to enhance measures to prevent fraud, ensure the timely distribution of materials, and apply proper judgment to address any technical issues during the exam, aiming for a smooth and reliable process in future examinations.

    Mains PYQ:

    Q National Education Policy 2020 is in conformity with the Sustainable Development Goal-4 (2030). It intends to restructure and reorient the education system in India. Critically examine the statement. (UPSC IAS/2020)