💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (August Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

GS Paper: GS1

  • Poverty Estimates: Issues With PLFS Data

    Central Idea

    • The claim of poverty reduction in India during the pandemic year of 2020-21 is contested due to discrepancies in data and survey design. The PLFS data is used to make this claim, and there are recent papers that have come up with divergent claims on trends in poverty, showing both a rapid decline in poverty as well as a sharp increase.

    Use of Comparable Estimates

    • Poverty estimates in India have always been based on consumption estimates from the NSO, particularly based on the consumption expenditure surveys (CES).
    • The last official poverty estimates were for 2011-12, even though a comparable consumption survey was conducted in 2017-18.

    What is Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS)?

    • PLFS is a large-scale household survey conducted by the National Statistical Office (NSO) of India.
    • It collects data on various aspects of the labour force in India, including employment, unemployment, and labour force participation rates. In addition to these labour force indicators, the PLFS also collects data on consumption expenditure, which can be used to estimate poverty levels.

    Issue with PLFS Data

    • Estimates are not comparable: The PLFS estimates of poverty are not comparable with those from the CES, as the PLFS estimates are based on a single question.
    • Consumption estimates: The issue of sensitivity of consumption estimates to survey design, the level of aggregation and details has been extensively written about and was at the heart of the Great Indian Poverty Debate of the early 2000s.
    • Details about consumption expenditure is not just relevant: The sensitivity to the details of questions asked to collect consumption expenditure is not just relevant across different surveys but also across different rounds of the PLFS.

    Poverty Trends

    • The first set of conclusions can be drawn for the period between 2011-12 and 2017-18.
    • Using the CES based full schedule and the leaked report for 2017-18, a rise in poverty can be seen.
    • For a similar time period, the single question asked in the earlier rounds of PLFS can be compared with the 2014-15 (72nd round) NSO survey on services and durable goods expenditure which had exactly the same question in the same block with the same instructions making them comparable to estimates from the PLFS from 2017-18 to 2019-20.
    • These suggest that the poverty headcount ratio was 27 per cent in 2014-15 and rose to 36 per cent in 2017-18, declining to 32 per cent in 2018-19 and remaining at that level in 2019-20.
    • Unfortunately, for the period during the pandemic (2019-20 to 2020-21) that the PM paper tries to address, it is difficult to say what happened based on available consumption data because of the questionnaire changes mentioned above.

    Impact on Policy

    • The absence of official estimates on poverty is also a reflection of the lack of political priority of the government on such a crucial indicator.
    • Currently, a survey on consumption expenditure is being canvassed by the NSO which again follows a completely new methodology and schedule. While it may provide another set of estimates of consumption expenditure, it is unlikely to help resolve the poverty debate.

    Conclusion

    • The issue of what happened to poverty after 2011-12 is crucial for policy. However, frequent interference in the statistical system through changes in survey and questionnaire design, suppression of data, and delaying the release of crucial data are making it difficult to have a correct assessment of reality. The absence of official estimates on poverty is a reflection of the lack of political priority of the government on such a crucial indicator.

  • Artform in news: Bidri Crafts

    bidri

    Bidri craft artist from Karnataka Shah Rasheed Ahmed Quadri has been conferred with the prestigious Padma Shri Award.

    Bidri Crafts

    • Bidri ware is a traditional form of handicraft that originated in Bidar, Karnataka.
    • It involves the crafting of metal wares using a unique technique that incorporates zinc and copper.

    Its history

    • Bidri ware has a long history that can be traced back to the 14th century.
    • It was introduced to Bidar by Persian artisans during the reign of the Bahmani Sultans.
    • The craft flourished under the patronage of the Mughal emperors, and it became a symbol of wealth and status.

    Crafting process

    • The process of making Bidri ware involves several stages. First, a mould is made of the object to be crafted.
    • Next, the object is cast in an alloy of zinc and copper.
    • The cast object is then filed and polished to remove any rough edges.
    • The design is then etched onto the surface of the object using a sharp chisel.
    • The etched areas are then filled with a blackened paste made from a mixture of copper sulphate and mud.
    • Finally, the object is polished again to remove any excess paste and to create a smooth finish.

    Designs and motifs

    • Bidriware is known for its intricate designs and motifs, which are often inspired by nature, Islamic art, and Persian calligraphy.
    • Common motifs include flowers, leaves, and geometric patterns.
    • Many pieces also feature verses from the Quran or other Islamic texts.

    Recognition and awards

    • Bidri ware has received several awards and recognition for its craftsmanship and cultural significance.
    • In 2006, it was awarded the Geographical Indication status by the Indian government, which recognizes its unique origin and traditional crafting techniques.
    • Bidriware has also been recognized by UNESCO as an Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity.

     

     

     

  • GI art in news: Basohli Paintings

    basohli

    The famous Basohli Painting, known for its miniature art style from Kathua district, has received the Geographical Indication (GI) Tag.

    Basohli Paintings

    • Basohli Paintings are a form of miniature paintings that originated in the town of Basohli in the Kathua district of Jammu and Kashmir.
    • They are known for their vibrant color, intricate details, and depictions of Hindu mythology and legends.
    • Basohli Paintings date back to the 17th and 18th centuries and are considered to be the earliest examples of Pahari paintings.

    Key features 

    Description
    Miniature art Known for their miniature art style, characterized by intricate and detailed work
    Bold and vibrant color Made from natural dyes and pigments
    Depiction of Hindu mythology Life of Lord Krishna and stories from the Ramayana and Mahabharata
    Elaborate compositions Multiple figures and scenes depicted in a single painting
    Fine detailing Intricate patterns and designs that are often difficult to replicate
    Gold and silver accents Such accents add to their ornate and intricate appearance

     

    Other GI products from J&K

    • The UT of Jammu and Kashmir has included 33 products on the list that have received the GI tag on 31 March 2023.
    • The products that received the GI tags include Basohli Pashmina Woolen Products (Kathua), Chikri Wood Craft (Rajouri), Bhaderwah Rajma (Doda), Mushkbudji Rice (Anantnag), Kaladi (Udhampur), Sulai Honey (Ramban), Anardana (Ramban), and Ladakh Wood Carving (Ladakh).

    Back2Basics: Geographical Indication (GI)

    • A GI is a sign used on products that have a specific geographical origin and possess qualities or a reputation that are due to that origin.
    • Nodal Agency: Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT), Ministry of Commerce and Industry
    • India, as a member of the World Trade Organization (WTO), enacted the Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999 w.e.f. September 2003.
    • GIs have been defined under Article 22 (1) of the WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement.
    • The tag stands valid for 10 years.

     

  • Same-Sex Marriages: A Push Must Come From Representative Bodies

    Same-Sex Marriage

    Central Idea

    • The Centre’s opposition to the legalization of same-sex marriages based on cultural and societal concepts of marriage and family is examined and critiqued.

    The Centre’s Argument

    • The Centre argues that same-sex marriages are not recognized in Indian traditions, ethos, culture, and societal concepts of marriage.
    • The Parliament, and not the Court, should decide on legalizing same-sex marriages.

    Societal Conceptualization of Marriage

    • Marriage is a social institution, and the Centre’s stance finds backing in four interrelated sub-arguments.
    1. Same-sex marriages demand nuanced alteration of the conventional understanding of marriage.
    2. The current legislative framework promotes the conventional understanding of marriage.
    3. Religious and societal morality still conceptualizes intercourse as a procreative activity.
    4. Conventional conceptualisations of family and marriage are facing evolutionary challenges.

    What is mean by Same-sex marriage?

    • Same-sex marriage is the legal recognition of a marriage between two individuals of the same sex.
    • It grants same-sex couples the same legal and social recognition, rights, and privileges that are traditionally associated with marriage, including property rights, inheritance rights, and the ability to make decisions for each other in medical emergencies.
    • The recognition of same-sex marriage varies around the world, with some countries legalizing it while others do not.
    • The issue has been the subject of much debate and controversy, with arguments for and against same-sex marriage based on religious, cultural, social, and legal considerations.

    The Language of Rights

    • The Court must evaluate the Centre’s argument on its own merits.
    • While addressing the violations of fundamental rights resulting from non-recognition of same-sex marriages, the question of same-sex marriages is about the rights of a society to conserve traditions and an individual’s constitutional freedoms.

    Back to Basics: Special Marriage Act?

    • The Special Marriage Act is a law in India that allows individuals of different religions or nationalities to marry each other.
    • It was enacted in 1954 and came into effect from 1955.
    • The Special Marriage Act allows for inter-caste and inter-religious marriages, and couples who register under this act are not required to change their religion or follow any religious rites or rituals.
    • The act also provides for divorce on certain grounds and maintenance to the spouse and children.

    Conclusion

    • While the rights issues concerning same-sex couples are substantial, the implications of recognizing same-sex unions as a couple require a broader debate in society and the legislature. The push to formalize the institution of same-sex unions must come from representative bodies such as Parliament.

    Mains Question

    Q. Provide a detailed analysis including relevant legal, social, cultural, and ethical considerations of same sex marriage in India along with a way ahead

  • Carbon Pricing: The Way For Decarbonization

    Carbon

    Central Idea

    • Environmental destruction has been a consequence of boosting GDP growth in every country due to the absence of a price for natural resources like air and forests. To combat this, the biggest economies of the G-20 must agree on valuing nature, including by pricing carbon effluents. As president of the G-20 this year, India can take the lead in carbon pricing, which will open unexpected avenues of decarbonization.

    Pricing Carbon at present

    • Three ways of pricing carbon: carbon tax, emissions trading system (ETS), and import tariff on the carbon content
    • GHG emission: 46 countries price carbon, covering only 30% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions
    • IMF’s proposed price: International Monetary Fund (IMF) proposed price floors of $75, $50, and $25 a ton of carbon for the United States, China, and India, respectively
    • Benefits: Economy-wide benefits of carbon pricing in terms of damages avoided generally outweighed the cost it imposed on individual industries in EU, British Columbia, Canada, and Sweden
    • Boost to renewables: Carbon pricing makes investment in renewable energy such as solar and wind more attractive.

    Facts for prelims

    Carbon Pricing Method Description
    Carbon Tax A domestic tax imposed on carbon emissions, directly discouraging the use of fossil fuels and raising revenue for investment in cleaner sources of energy or protection of vulnerable consumers. Example: Korea and Singapore.
    Emissions Trading System (ETS) A system that allows entities with excess emissions allowances to sell them to those that are emitting more than their allotted limit. Example: European Union and China.
    Import Tariff on Carbon Content A tax on imported goods based on the amount of carbon emissions produced during their manufacturing process, designed to discourage importing high-emissions products. Example: Proposed by the European Union.
    Carbon Offsets A voluntary mechanism in which companies or individuals pay for projects that reduce greenhouse gas emissions. These projects may include reforestation, renewable energy, or energy efficiency initiatives. The amount of emissions reduced by the project can then be used to offset the emissions of the buyer.

    Carbon pricing for India

    • Among the three ways of pricing, India could find a carbon tax appealing as it can directly discourage fossil fuels, while raising revenues which can be invested in cleaner sources of energy or used to protect vulnerable consumers
    • IMF proposed $25 a ton as a starting point for India
    • The main obstacle is the argument by industrial firms about losing their competitive advantage to exporters from countries with a lower carbon price
    • All high, middle, and low-income countries should set the same rate within each bracket

    Carbon

    Way ahead: Need for Global Carbon Pricing

    • The first movers will be the most competitive: High enough carbon tax across China, the US, India, Russia, and Japan alone (more than 60% of global effluents), with complementary actions, could have a notable effect on global effluents and warming. The first movers will be the most competitive
    • India’s leadership: India can play a lead role by tabling global carbon pricing in the existential fight against climate change as president of the G-20 summit this September
    • Communication is important: Any type of carbon pricing faces stiff political opposition therefore communicating the idea of wins at the societal level is vital.

    Back to Basics: GHG’s

    Greenhouse Gas

    		 Properties Major Sources

    Impact
    Carbon Dioxide (CO2) -Long-lived in atmosphere.

    -Traps heat from the sun

    		 – Burning of fossil fuels (coal, oil, gas)

    -Deforestation

    		 – Accounts for 76% of global GHG emissions – Primary cause of climate change
    Methane (CH4) – Short-lived in atmosphere

    – Traps more heat than CO2

    		 – Agriculture (livestock digestion, manure management)

    – Energy production

    – Landfills

    		 – Accounts for 16% of global GHG emissions – Contributes to both climate change and air pollution
    Nitrous Oxide (N2O) – Long-lived in atmosphere

    – Traps more heat than CO2

    		 – Agriculture (fertilizer use, manure management)

    – Industrial processes

    – Combustion of fossil fuels

    		 – Accounts for 6% of global GHG emissions

    – Contributes to both climate change and air pollution
    Fluorinated Gases (HFCs, PFCs, SF6) – Can have high global warming potential – Industrial processes (refrigeration, air conditioning)

    – Semiconductors

    – Electrical transmission equipment

    		 – Accounts for less than 3% of global GHG emissions

    – Can have very high global warming potential
    Ozone (O3) – Not a GHG, but plays a role in climate change – Human-made chemicals that release ozone into the atmosphere – Contributes to climate change by trapping heat
    Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) – Human-made chemicals that destroy ozone in the atmosphere – Used in refrigeration, air conditioning, and aerosol sprays – Contributes to climate change by destroying ozone, which leads to greater heat-trapping

    Carbon

    Conclusion

    • India can take the lead in carbon pricing as president of the G-20 this year. By pricing carbon effluents, India can promote investment in renewable energy, protect vulnerable consumers, and contribute to the global fight against climate change. However, there is a need for effective communication to ensure that the idea of carbon pricing is understood at the societal level, and any type of carbon pricing faces stiff political opposition.

  • Arctic scientists race to preserve ‘Ice Memory’

    snap

    Scientists from Italy, France, and Norway have set up camp in Norway’s Svalbard archipelago to extract samples of ancient ice for analysis before the frozen layers melt away due to climate change.

    ‘Ice Memory’ Project

    • Scientists will drill a series of tubes as far as 125 meters (137 yards) below the surface, which contains frozen geochemical traces dating back three centuries.
    • The scientists will work for three weeks in temperatures as low as -25 degrees Celsius (-13 Fahrenheit) to extract ice.
    • The Ice Memory foundation is running the operation.
    • The ice cores will provide scientists with valuable data about past environmental conditions.

    Analysis and storage

    • One set of ice tubes will be used for immediate analysis, while a second set will be sent to Antarctica for storage in an “ice memory sanctuary” under the snow.
    • The samples will be preserved for future generations of scientists.

    Reason for drilling

    • The Arctic is warming between two and four times faster than the global average, and water from melting ice is altering the geochemical records preserved in ancient ice beneath.
    • Hence, scientists are in a race against time to preserve crucial ice records before it disappears forever from the surface of the planet.

  • ICJ and Climate Justice

    Central idea: On March 29, the United Nations General Assembly passed a resolution that requested an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) regarding the obligations countries have towards climate change reduction.

    Facts for prelims: International Court of Justice (ICJ)

    • The ICJ is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations (UN).
    • It was established in June 1945 by the Charter of the United Nations and began work in April 1946.
    • The court is the successor to the Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ), which was brought into being through, and by, the League of Nations.
    • It held its inaugural sitting at the Peace Palace in The Hague, Netherlands, in February 1922.
    • After World War II, the League of Nations and PCIJ were replaced by the United Nations and ICJ respectively.
    • The PCIJ was formally dissolved in April 1946, and its last president, Judge José Gustavo Guerrero of El Salvador, became the first president of the ICJ.
    • Four Indians have been members of the ICJ so far.
    • Justice Dalveer Bhandari, former judge of the Supreme Court, has been serving at the ICJ since 2012.

     

    Vanuatu seeks climate reparations

    • The resolution, which was passed by consensus, was pushed through by the Pacific Island of Vanuatu, which was devastated by Cyclone Pam in 2015.
    • This resolution is significant because it invokes article 96 of the U.N. Charter and seeks to clarify the legal obligations of states to protect the climate system.

    Resolution A/77/L.58: What does it seek?

    The draft resolution (A/77/L.58) asks the ICJ to deliberate on two questions:

    1. Obligations of states: Under international law to ensure the protection of the climate system for present and future generations
    2. Legal consequences: For states that have caused significant harm to the climate system, particularly for Small Island Developing States (SIDS) and for people who are harmed?

    Frameworks invoked by Vanuatu

    The resolution refers to several international protocols, including the-

    1. Paris Agreement
    2. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and
    3. Universal Declaration of Human Rights

    What do sponsors of the resolution want?

    • The sponsors of the resolution expect an advisory opinion from the ICJ to bolster the efforts under the global climate pledge.
    • The opinion is also expected to clarify more contentious issues, such as-
    1. Climate reparations by the developed world,
    2. Legal culpability for countries that don’t achieve their NDC promises
    3. Climate support to the most vulnerable parts of the world

    Where does India stand over this?

    • India has been silent about the resolution, although it is generally supportive of climate justice and holding the developed world accountable for global warming.
    • India did not co-sponsor the draft resolution, unlike its neighbors Bangladesh, Maldives, Nepal, and Sri Lanka.

    If ICJ intervenes, what would change?

    • Only advisory opinion: The ICJ is being asked for an advisory opinion, which would not be legally binding as an ICJ judgment.
    • Puts moral obligation: The ICJ carries “legal weight and moral authority”.
    • Symbolic significance: ICJ’s clarification of international environmental laws would make the process more streamlined, particularly as the COP process looks at various issues like climate finance, climate justice, and the most recently agreed to “loss and damages” etc.

    Conclusion

    • The resolution passed by the UNGA requesting an advisory opinion from the ICJ is a step in the right direction towards clarifying the legal obligations of states to mitigate climate change and protect the environment for future generations.
    • To ensure the success of this effort, countries need to continue to engage in diplomatic efforts and work towards shared goals.
    • Countries should also actively participate in the ICJ process and respect the advisory opinion it delivers.

  • UN allows Deep Sea Mining operations from July

    mining

    Central idea: The International Seabed Authority has announced that it will start accepting applications from companies for deep sea mining from July.

    Why in news?

    • This decision was made in the absence of a mining code that has not been put in place yet.

    What is Deep Sea Mining?

    • Deep-sea mining is the process of extracting minerals from the deep ocean floor.
    • The minerals that are extracted can include valuable metals such as copper, gold, nickel, and manganese, as well as rare earth metals that are used in high-tech devices such as smartphones, computers, and electric vehicles.
    • The minerals are found in the form of polymetallic nodules that are located on the ocean floor at depths of around 4 to 6 kilometers.
    • Deep-sea mining involves the use of specially designed equipment that can withstand the extreme pressure and temperature conditions found at these depths.

    About International Seabed Authority

    • The International Seabed Authority is a Jamaica-based organization established under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.
    • The authority holds jurisdiction over the ocean floors outside of the Exclusive Economic Zones of its 167 member states.

    Reasons behind undersea mining

    • The mining is aimed at extracting cobalt, copper, nickel, and manganese from the ocean’s floor.
    • The undersea mining will extract key battery materials from polymetallic nodules found at depths of 4 kilometers to 6 kilometers.
    • These nodules are potato-sized rocks containing cobalt, copper, nickel, and manganese.

    Key concern: Mining code missing

    • Despite 10 years of discussion, there is no mining code in place.
    • The governing council of ISA is uncertain about the process it should adopt for reviewing applications for mining contracts.

    Issues with deep-sea mining

    • Deep-sea mining is a controversial issue that has raised concerns among non-governmental organizations, experts, and some countries.
    • One major concern is the potential damage to the seabed and the essential function of deep-sea ecosystems in regulating the climate.
    • Mining activities can also have wider impacts on fish populations, marine mammals, and other ocean life.

    Tap to read more about

    India’s Deep Ocean Mission

  • In news: Formation story of Rajasthan

    rajasthan

    Rajasthan Day is celebrated on March 30, marking the day the state was created by unifying 22 princely states and chiefships. Rajasthan’s story of foundation is intriguing.

    Formation of Rajasthan

    • At the time of Independence, Rajasthan was almost wholly contained in the Rajputana Agency, a political office of the British Indian Empire.
    • The Rajputana Agency consisted of 22 princely states and estates.
    • Less than 22 months after Independence, all 22 had assimilated to form what would become India’s largest state.
    • However, modifications were made to the boundaries after the State Reorganisation Act (1956), giving Rajasthan its present shape.

    Challenges of Princely States

    (1) Rajputana Agency

    • The Rajputana Agency spanned roughly 330,330 sq. km, with an agent under the Governor-General in charge, residing at Mount Abu.
    • All the princely states and estates in the agency (22 in total) were ruled by Hindu rulers with the exception of Tonk (which had a Muslim ruler).

    (2) The Matsya Union

    • The States Ministry believed that four princely states – Alwar, Bharatpur, Dholpur, and Karauli – at the eastern edge of the erstwhile Rajputana Agency had “natural, racial and economic affinities” with each other.
    • Thus, the Matsya Union was inaugurated on March 18, 1948.

    (3) Rajasthan Union in South-East Rajputana

    • Ten princely states, with Udaipur (also known as Mewar) being the largest, wanted to form a union.
    • An idea to merge these into Madhya Bharat was also floated but did not go through.
    • Another idea to merge these states into the much larger Udaipur was proposed by the Maharana of Udaipur, Bhupal Singh Bahadur.
    • However, this was not agreeable to the other princely states. Hence, on March 25, 1948, the nine other states came together to form the Rajasthan Union.
    • Within three days after its formation, Udaipur decided to join this union.

    (4) Greater Rajasthan

    • The four largest princely states – Jaipur, Jodhpur, Bikaner, and Jaisalmer – still remained independent.
    • The alternative, backed by Patel, was to merge all four states into the newly formed Rajasthan Union.
    • Greater Rajasthan was officially inaugurated by Patel on March 30, 1949 – the date still celebrated as Rajasthan Day.

    Modifications by the State Reorganisation Commission

    • The State Reorganisation Commission (SRC) was formed in 1953 to recommend new state boundaries to the government, in response to demands for states based on linguistic lines.
    • The SRC’s recommendations, with some modifications, were implemented in the State Reorganisation Act of November 1, 1956.
    • For Rajasthan, this brought some minor changes, including the integration of Ajmer as a district within Rajasthan, given its linguistic, cultural, and geographical links to the state.
    • Abu Road Taluk, a taluk of the Sirohi district of southern Rajasthan, was also integrated into Rajasthan after being sliced and included in the Bombay State.
    • The enclave of Sunel in Rajasthan’s southeastern edge was received from Madhya Pradesh in exchange for the enclave of Sironj, due to administrative reasons.

    Conclusion

    • Overall, the state of Rajasthan was created through a complex process of merger and integration of various princely states and chiefships.
    • Today, Rajasthan is the largest state in India in terms of land area, covering 342,239 square kilometers, and is known for its rich cultural heritage, majestic forts and palaces, vibrant festivals, and diverse cuisine that attract visitors from all over the world.

     

  • Climate Justice and Accountability: Can Countries be Sued for Failing to Avert Climate Emergencies

    Central Idea

    • The UN General Assembly has asked the International Court of Justice to weigh in on whether countries can be sued under international law for failing to avert climate emergencies, reflecting the frustration of the international community with global climate agencies and the need for more effective climate action.

    Background

    • Resolution by Vanuatu: The resolution, sponsored by the small Pacific island nation of Vanuatu, was adopted unanimously, indicating global consensus on the climate crisis.
    • Delay climate action: Frustration with the procedures of global climate agencies, particularly the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), stems from their deliberations often ending in compromises that delay climate action.
    • ICJ’s decision carries moral weight: The Hague-based court’s opinion will not be binding but carries moral weight, potentially setting the stage for countries to incorporate climate justice in their legal frameworks.

    Role of ICJ and its jurisdiction

    1. Contentious: Contentious jurisdiction refers to the ICJ’s authority to resolve legal disputes between consenting states. Decisions made under contentious jurisdiction are binding
    2. Advisory:
    • Advisory jurisdiction allows the UN General Assembly (UNGA), the Security Council (SC), and other specialized bodies of the organization to request the ICJ’s opinion on a legal question.
    • The ICJ’s advisory opinions are non-binding. However, they hold significant normative weight and serve to clarify international law on relevant issues.
    • The ICJ’s advisory opinion on climate change can be useful in climate-related litigation at the national level.

    Previous attempts to address climate change in non-environmental forums

    • Global warming on agenda: Global warming has been part of the UN Security Council’s agenda since 2007, with the UNSC attempting to frame the issue from a security standpoint, rather than solely from developmental or environmental perspectives.
    • Securitization of climate change: Developing countries, including India and China, have rightly resisted the securitization of climate change, arguing that it could lead to the imposition of sanctions and other coercive measures.
    • Rights and justice: The use of rights and justice vocabulary has given the Vanuatu-sponsored proposal more traction and global support.

    Rights and justice vocabulary and recent developments

    • Climate justice: The Vanuatu-sponsored proposal emphasizes the importance of climate justice in addressing the issue.
    • Right to reparations: Countries have started asserting their right to reparations after climate emergencies, such as Pakistan after the devastating floods in 2020 and the recent discussions on loss and damage during the COP26 conference in Glasgow.
    • Rising climate litigation cases worldwide: The rise of climate litigation cases worldwide, where citizens and organizations sue governments and corporations for their failure to act on climate change, highlights the growing demand for climate justice.

    Challenges in holding countries accountable

    • Holding individual accountable: Holding individual countries or governments accountable for their climate inaction has been a major stumbling block at several climate meets.
    • Compensation issue: The Paris Agreement contains a clause specifying that the pact does not involve or provide a basis for any liability or compensation, inserted under pressure from US diplomats.
    • Adamant stance: American support for the UNGA resolution was reportedly reluctant, indicating that powerful countries might resist being held accountable for their climate inaction.

    Conclusion

    • The UNGA’s intervention should not detract from the task of reforming the UNFCCC. Institutions of the umbrella climate agency need to be more equity-sensitive and justice-oriented. Engaging with the ICJ could push it in that direction, but wealthier members of the UNFCCC must show more initiative. The growing demand for climate justice and the increasing number of climate litigation cases highlight the importance of addressing the issue in a just and equitable manner.