💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (July Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

GS Paper: GS2

  • SC ends Immunity for Legislators taking Bribes

    In the news

    • A seven-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court, headed by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, delivered a significant judgment regarding parliamentary privilege and criminal prosecution.
    • The verdict overturned a 1998 ruling in PV Narasimha Rao Case that granted immunity to lawmakers accepting bribes if they subsequently voted or spoke in the House

    Also read:

    Legislators Immunity against Criminal Prosecution

    What are Parliamentary Privileges?

    Details
    Definition Special rights, immunities, and exemptions enjoyed by Parliament, its committees, and members.

    Defined in Article 105 of the Indian Constitution.
    Scope Applies to Parliament, committees, and members.
    Freedom of Speech Guaranteed under Article 105(1).

    Subject to rules and procedures of Parliament (Article 118).
    Limitations to Free Speech Speech must comply with constitutional provisions.

    Cannot discuss judges’ conduct (Article 121), except for motions for their removal.
    Freedom from Arrest Immunity from arrest in civil cases 40 days before and after sessions.

    House permission needed for arrest within Parliament limits.
    Notification of Arrest Chairman/Speaker must be informed of any member’s arrest.
    Right to Prohibit Publication No liability for publishing reports, discussions under member’s authority (Article 105(2)).
    Right to Exclude Strangers Members have power to exclude non-members from proceedings.

     

    Immunity against Bribe: Constitutional Provisions Examined

    • Article 105(2): This article grants immunity to members of Parliament from court proceedings concerning their actions (speech or votes) in Parliament.
    • Article 194(2): Similarly, this article extends immunity to members of state assemblies.

    Court’s Review and Interpretation

    • PV Narasimha Rao Case: In 1998, the Supreme Court ruled with a 3:2 majority that MPs and MLAs were immune from prosecution in bribery cases as long as they fulfilled their end of the bargain.
    • Judicial Scrutiny of Privilege: The Court revisited the interpretation of Articles 105(2) and 194(2), challenging the traditional understanding of absolute immunity for lawmakers.
    • Historical Context: It noted that India’s parliamentary privileges stem from statutory and constitutional sources, unlike the UK’s House of Commons, which has ancient and undoubted rights.

    Key Findings and Interpretations

    • Necessity Test Applied: The Court applied a “necessity test” to determine the legitimacy of claims to parliamentary privilege, emphasizing that accepting bribes cannot be deemed necessary for lawmakers to discharge their duties.
    • Emphasis on Probity: The ruling underscored the importance of probity in public life, highlighting the corrosive impact of corruption on democratic ideals.
    • Interpretation of Offense: It clarified that the act of accepting a bribe constitutes an offense, regardless of subsequent actions by the lawmaker in the House.

    Conclusion

    • The Supreme Court’s ruling represents a significant departure from past precedent, affirming the principle that no individual, including legislators, is above the law.
    • By asserting the judiciary’s role in scrutinizing claims of parliamentary privilege, the Court reaffirmed the primacy of constitutional values and accountability in governance.
    • This landmark judgment underscores the judiciary’s commitment to upholding the rule of law and combating corruption, thereby bolstering India’s democratic foundations.

  • India’s Bail System: Challenges and Prospects

    bail

    In the news

    • India’s bail system faces significant challenges, resulting in a large number of undertrials remaining in prison despite being granted bail.
    • The complexities of complying with bail conditions, especially for marginalized individuals, exacerbate the situation.

    Bail Provisions in India

    Description
    What is Bail? The conditional release of a defendant with the promise to appear in court when required. It also refers to the security deposit to secure the release of the accused.
    Types of Bail in India
    • Regular bail: Granted to a person in police custody, applied for under section 437 and 439 of CrPC.
    • Interim bail: Short-term bail granted before the hearing for regular or anticipatory bail.
    • Anticipatory bail: Granted under section 438 of CrPC by session court or High Court, to avoid potential arrest for a non-bailable offense.
    Case in Bailable Offences Section 436 states that accused of a bailable offence under IPC can be granted bail if:

    1. There’s reason to believe the accused didn’t commit the offence.
    2. There’s need for further inquiry.
    3. Accused isn’t charged with an offence punishable by death, life imprisonment, or up to 10 years’ imprisonment.
    Bail for Non-Bailable Offences Section 437 states that accused doesn’t have the right to apply for bail. Bail may be granted if:

    1. Accused is a woman or child.
    2. Lack of evidence.
    3. Delay in lodging FIR.
    4. Accused is gravely sick.

    Understanding the Crisis in Bail System

    • Overrepresentation of Undertrials: Over 75% of India’s prison population comprises undertrials, reflecting systemic inefficiencies in the bail system.
    • Judicial Reluctance: Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud highlighted a growing reluctance among trial judges to grant bail, leading to a situation where incarceration becomes the norm.
    • Bail Backlog: The backlog of bail applications further exacerbates the problem, prolonging the detention of undertrials awaiting trial.

    Judicial Acknowledgment and Guidelines

    • Supreme Court’s Observations: The Supreme Court acknowledged the ineffectiveness of India’s bail system in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs CBI, emphasizing the principle of ‘bail not jail’.
    • Need for Legislative Action: The Court urged the enactment of separate legislation and laid down comprehensive guidelines to streamline bail procedures.
    • Delayed Disposal of Applications: Despite court directives, delays in the disposal of bail applications contribute to prolonged detention of undertrials.

    Empirical Assessment and Policy Reforms

    • Lack of Empirical Evidence: The absence of empirical data hampers efforts to understand the bail system’s challenges comprehensively.
    • Socio-economic Barriers: Bail laws disproportionately burden marginalized individuals, necessitating reforms based on a realistic assessment of the problem.
    • No Data-driven Reform: Policymakers should prioritize empirical research to inform evidence-based policy reforms aimed at addressing systemic inequalities.

    Safeguards and Adjudication Practices

    • Arrest Safeguards: Existing safeguards against arbitrary arrest often exclude vulnerable populations, contributing to the high proportion of undertrials.
    • Discretionary Adjudication: Courts exercise discretion in granting bail, but guidelines lack clarity on how socioeconomic factors influence bail decisions.
    • Recording Reasons for Bail Denial: Courts should be mandated to record detailed reasons for denying bail, promoting transparency and accountability in the adjudication process.

    Bail Compliance Challenges

    • Financial Hurdles: Many undertrials struggle to comply with bail conditions due to financial constraints and lack of local sureties.
    • Structural Disadvantages: Factors like lack of residence proof and family support further hinder undertrials’ ability to comply with bail conditions.
    • Support Mechanisms: Establishing support mechanisms to assist undertrials in navigating the bail process and fulfilling conditions can alleviate compliance challenges.

    Why bail needs reform?

    • Indiscriminate arrests: Of this category of prisoners, majority may not even be required to be arrested despite registration of a cognizable offense, being charged with offenses punishable for seven years or less.
    • Disadvantageous for some sections: They are not only poor and illiterate but also would include women. Thus, there is a culture of offense being inherited by many of them.
    • Colonial legacy: Theoretically, the court also linked the idea of indiscriminate arrests to magistrates ignoring the rule of “bail, not jail” to a colonial mindset.

    Way forward

    • No Flawed Assumptions: The current bail system operates on flawed assumptions about the accused’s socio-economic status, rendering ‘bail not jail’ meaningless for many.
    • Call for Bail Reform: Meaningful bail reform necessitates a reevaluation of these assumptions and a data-driven approach to diagnose systemic issues.
    • Holistic Approach: Reform efforts should adopt a holistic approach, addressing both procedural inadequacies and socio-economic barriers to ensure equitable access to bail.

    Conclusion

    • India’s bail system stands at a critical juncture, with an urgent need for reform to address systemic inefficiencies and ensure justice for all.
    • Empirical research, legislative action, and judicial scrutiny are essential components of a comprehensive reform agenda.

    Try this PYQ from CSE Prelims 2021:

    With reference to India, consider the following statements:

    1. Judicial custody means and accused is in the custody of the concerned magistrate and such accused is locked up in a police station, not in jail.
    2. During judicial custody, the police officer in charge of the case is not allowed to interrogate the suspect without the approval of the court.

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

    (a) 1 only

    (b) 2 only

    (c) Both 1 and 2

    (d) Neither 1 nor 2

    [wpdiscuz-feedback id=”wwodi0ynqz” question=”Please leave a feedback on this” opened=”1″]Post your responses here.[/wpdiscuz-feedback]

  • Punjab-Himachal dispute over the Shanan Hydropower Project

    Shanan Hydropower Project

    In the news

    • A longstanding dispute between Punjab and Himachal Pradesh over the ownership of the Shanan hydropower project has escalated, leading to legal intervention by both parties.
    • As the 99-year-old lease of the project expired on March 2, the Centre has issued orders to maintain status quo until a final decision is reached.

    Shanan Hydropower Project and the Dispute

    • Location: It is located on the Uhl River, a tributary of the Beas River, in Mandi district, Himachal Pradesh, India.
    • British-era Lease: The 110-MW Shanan hydel project was leased to Punjab in 1925 by the then-ruler of Mandi, Raja Joginder Bahadur, under a 99-year lease agreement.
    • Competing Claims: Himachal Pradesh contends that the project should revert to its control upon the expiry of the lease, citing historical and legal grounds for its claim.
    • Economic Significance: The project has significant economic implications for both states, contributing to their power generation capacities and regional development.

    Punjab’s Claims over the Project

    • Historical Ownership: The project historically supplied power to undivided Punjab and Delhi before Independence, and it was allocated to Punjab during the reorganization of states in 1966.
    • Legal Basis: Punjab asserts its legal control over the project under the provisions of the Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966, reinforced by a central notification issued in 1967.
    • Utilization of Resources: Punjab argues that it has invested in the maintenance and operation of the project, making it a vital component of its energy infrastructure.

    Legal Proceedings and Centre’s Intervention

    • Supreme Court Petition: Punjab has filed a suit in the Supreme Court, seeking a permanent injunction against Himachal Pradesh from disturbing its lawful possession of the project.
    • Interim Status Quo Order: The Centre, invoking its powers under relevant laws, has ordered the status quo on the project’s functioning until a final decision is made, emphasizing the public interest in maintaining stability.
    • Legal Interpretation: The interpretation of historical agreements and legislative acts will be pivotal in determining the rightful ownership of the project.

    Implications and Future Course of Action

    • Interim Measure: The Centre’s order is an interim measure to prevent disruption in the functioning of the Shanan Power House until the dispute is resolved.
    • Legal Framework: Both parties are expected to proceed further within the legal framework to settle the dispute, ensuring adherence to due process and fairness.
    • Regional Cooperation: A collaborative approach between Punjab and Himachal Pradesh, facilitated by federal authorities, could lead to a mutually beneficial resolution and promote inter-state harmony.

  • A vaccine that prevents six cancers

    Pyq mains

    UPSC IAS/2017

    Stem cell therapy is gaining popularity in India to treat a wide variety of medical conditions including leukaemia, Thalassemia, damaged cornea and several burns. Describe briefly what stem cell therapy is and what advantages it has over other treatments? (10)
    Pyq pre 

     

    Cervical Cancer: Symptoms, Diagnosis & Treatment

    Why is it in the News?

    • Cervical cancer prevention, particularly through HPV vaccination, has gained attention recently due to several factors. January was observed as Cervical Cancer Awareness Month, drawing focus to the importance of combating this disease. Additionally, March 4 marked International HPV Awareness Day, further highlighting the significance of addressing HPV-related health issues.

    What is Cervical Cancer?

    • Cervical cancer is a type of cancer that affects the cervix, the lower part of the uterus. It is primarily caused by certain types of the Human Papillomavirus (HPV), which is transmitted through intimate contact.
    • If left untreated, cervical cancer can be life-threatening. It is a significant health concern worldwide, with a particularly high burden in lower- and middle-income countries. In India, cervical cancer is the second most common cancer among women, posing a substantial threat to public health.

    What is Human Papillomavirus (HPV)?

    • Human Papillomavirus (HPV) is a group of viruses that infect the skin and mucous membranes. It’s the most common sexually transmitted infection (STI) worldwide. HPV can cause various health issues, including genital warts and certain types of cancers.

    What Facts are explained in the article?

    • Prevalence and Impact: Cervical cancer claims the lives of over 300,000 women annually worldwide, with a disproportionate burden in lower-income countries.
    • Risk in India: With over 500 million women at risk, cervical cancer is a significant public health concern in India, second only to breast cancer.
    • Role of HPV Vaccination: HPV vaccination is identified as a crucial strategy for preventing cervical cancer. It targets the underlying cause of the disease by protecting against HPV infection.

    Strategies for Prevention of Cervical cancer

    • HPV Vaccination: Implementing widespread HPV vaccination programs, particularly targeting adolescent girls, can significantly reduce the incidence of cervical cancer. Vaccination should ideally occur before the onset of sexual activity to maximize effectiveness.
    • Screening for Precancerous Lesions: Regular screening for precancerous lesions, such as Pap smears or HPV DNA tests, can detect abnormalities early and allow for timely intervention. This is crucial for reducing the incidence of advanced-stage cervical cancer.
    • Education and Awareness: Increasing education and awareness about cervical cancer, HPV infection, and the importance of vaccination and screening are essential. This includes targeting healthcare professionals, policymakers, parents, and adolescents to dispel myths and misconceptions and encourage uptake of preventive measures.

    What are the Challenges?

    • Limited Access: HPV vaccination may not be widely accessible, particularly in lower-resourced communities, and is often available at a significant out-of-pocket cost.
    • Misconceptions Among Physicians: Some physicians underestimate the incidence and risk of cervical cancer, as well as the safety and effectiveness of HPV vaccines. This can lead to hesitancy in recommending vaccination to eligible individuals.
    • Parental Hesitancy: Misinformation and concerns about vaccine safety and efficacy among parents can contribute to hesitancy in vaccinating adolescents against HPV.
    Pap Smears
    Description: A screening procedure for cervical cancer involving collecting cells from the cervix to examine for abnormalities.
    Purpose: To detect precancerous or cancerous changes in cervical cells early for timely intervention and prevention.
    Procedure: Use of a speculum to visualize the cervix and collection of cells with a brush or spatula.
    Timing: Typically performed during routine gynecological exams, starting at age 21 or within 3 years of becoming sexually active.

    Facts about HPV Vaccination:

    • The HPV vaccine is safe and effective in preventing six HPV-related cancers, including cervical, vulvar, anal, vaginal, throat, and cervical cancers.
    • Vaccination is recommended for adolescents starting at age 9 years to maximize its effectiveness.
    • HPV vaccination is an essential component of the immunization schedule recommended by the Indian Academy of Pediatrics (IAP).

    Best Practices for HPV Vaccination and Cervical Cancer Prevention:

    • Effective Communication:
    • Provide clear and accurate information to parents about HPV vaccination.
    • Address concerns and misconceptions to ensure informed decision-making.
    • Timely Vaccination:
    • Recommend HPV vaccination for adolescents starting at age 9.
    • Encourage vaccination before sexual activity begins for maximum effectiveness.
    • Integration into Immunization Programs:
    • Advocate for inclusion in national immunization programs for widespread access.
    • Collaborate with policymakers to ensure equitable vaccine coverage.
    • Promotion of Regular Screening:
    • Emphasize the importance of cervical cancer screening for women over 30.
    • Encourage routine Pap smears or HPV DNA tests for early detection.
    • Physician Education:
    • Provide comprehensive training on HPV vaccination and cervical cancer prevention.
    • Equip healthcare professionals with updated guidelines and communication skills.

    In conclusion, the article emphasizes the importance of proactive measures to prevent cervical cancer, particularly through HPV vaccination and screening. It underscores the role of healthcare professionals, policymakers, and community stakeholders in addressing the challenges and ensuring equitable access to preventive interventions.

  • India seizes Dual-Use Items bound for Pakistan from China

    In the news

    • Indian customs officials at Mumbai Port seized two advanced Computer Numerical Control (CNC) machines manufactured by GKD, Italy, en route to the port of Karachi from China.
    • The CNC machines, critical for manufacturing parts utilized in Pakistan’s missile development program, were destined for Karachi.

    What are Dual-Use Items?

    • Definition: Dual-use items refer to commodities that possess the potential for application in both civilian and military contexts.
    • Regulatory Scrutiny: These items are subject to stringent regulation due to their capability to be initially designed for civilian purposes but later repurposed for military or even terrorist activities.
    • Examples: Examples of dual-use items include global positioning satellites, missiles, nuclear technology, chemical and biological weapons, night vision technology, drones, precision-engineered aluminium pipes, and specific types of ball bearings.

    Global Control Mechanisms for Dual-Use Items

    (1) Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR):

    • Established: In 1987 by G-7 countries.
    • Purpose: To limit the proliferation of missiles capable of delivering weapons of mass destruction.
    • Membership: Consists of 35 member countries.
    • Guidelines: Members coordinate national export controls to prevent missile proliferation.
    • India’s Membership: India became the 35th member in 2016.

    (2) Wassenaar Arrangement (WA):

    • Established: In 1996 with 42 participating states.
    • Purpose: Prevent destabilizing accumulations of conventional arms and dual-use goods and technologies.
    • Export Controls: Member countries apply controls on listed items to avoid enhancing military capabilities.
    • India not a member: It it has expressed interest in joining to strengthen its export controls and enhance its non-proliferation efforts.

    (3) Australia Group (AG):

    • Formation: Prompted by Iraq’s use of chemical weapons in 1985.
    • Focus: Initially on chemical weapons precursor chemicals, expanded to include biological weapons prevention.
    • Membership: Composed of 42 member countries. India is NOT a member.
    • Objective: Harmonization of international export controls on chemical and biological technologies.

    (4) Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG):

    • Established: In 1974 in response to India’s nuclear tests.
    • Purpose: Control nuclear and nuclear-related technology to prevent proliferation.
    • Membership: Consists of 48 participating governments.
    • Guidelines: Aim to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons through control measures.

    [Note: India is also party to key conventions such as the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) and Biological and Toxic Weapons Convention (BWC).]

    India’s in-house mechanisms against Dual-Use Items

    • Role of DGFT: The Director General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) in India oversees the regulation of dual-use items through the SCOMET list (Specialty Chemicals, Organisms, Materials, Equipment, and Technologies).
    • SCOMET List: SCOMET items encompass special chemicals, organisms, materials, equipment, and technologies with dual-use potential.
    • Regulatory Framework: Exporting SCOMET items is subject to strict regulations, either requiring a license or being prohibited altogether.
    • Alignment with International Controls: The SCOMET control list aligns with the control lists of various multilateral export control regimes and conventions.

  • Legislators Immunity against Criminal Prosecution

    In the news

    • The Supreme Court is set to decide if legislators (MPs and MLAs) enjoy immunity from bribery charges in connection with votes made in Parliament and Legislative Assemblies.

    Legislators Immunity: Background and Context

    • Constitutional Provisions: Articles 194(2) (for MLAs) and 105(2) (MPs) of the Constitution grant legislators immunity from legal proceedings concerning their speeches and votes in Parliament and Legislative Assemblies.
    • P.V. Narasimha Case: In 1998, the Supreme Court upheld this immunity in the case of P.V. Narasimha Rao v State (CBI/SPE), ruling that legislators are shielded from criminal prosecution for bribery linked to their parliamentary actions.

    Reasons for Reconsideration

    • Sita Soren’s Case: The appeal by JMM MLA Sita Soren, accused of accepting bribes during Rajya Sabha elections, prompted a reevaluation of the Narasimha verdict.
    • Interpretation Issues: Concerns were raised about the broad interpretation of immunity and its implications for combating bribery in legislative bodies.

    Arguments Supporting Immunity

    • Absolute Protection: Advocates contend that legislators enjoy complete immunity from legal action under constitutional provisions. They argue that the Speaker holds authority to address moral infractions through expulsion.
    • Interpretation of Articles: The dissenting opinion in Narasimha sought to narrow the scope of immunity, but proponents stress adherence to the literal interpretation of constitutional language.

    Arguments against

    • Completion of Offence: Critics argue that the offence of bribery is consummated upon acceptance of the bribe, irrespective of subsequent actions. They advocate holding legislators accountable from the moment the bribe is accepted.
    • Legitimate Legislative Actions: Distinguishing between legitimate and illegitimate actions, advocates assert that actions stemming from criminal conduct, such as vote-buying, should not be shielded by immunity.

    Legal Interpretation and Statutory Compliance

    • Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988: Critics highlight inconsistencies between the Narasimha ruling and the provisions of the PCA, emphasizing the need for alignment with anti-corruption legislation.
    • Intent and Performance: Solicitor General Mehta underscored the disconnect between the Narasimha verdict and the intent of the Prevention of Corruption Act, particularly regarding the timing of criminal liability.

    P.V. Narasimha Case (1998) Analogy

    Judgement protects bribe-takers after there is “performance” (a speech or vote is given based on the bribe), even though Section 7 of the PCA specifically punishes public servants who accept bribes “to” or “as a reward for” performing their public duty improperly or dishonestly.

    Way Forward

    • Balancing Integrity and Immunity: The court’s ruling will determine the delicate balance between upholding legislative immunity and ensuring accountability for criminal acts.
    • Interpretative Scrutiny: A nuanced interpretation of constitutional provisions is essential to address the evolving complexities of legislative conduct and accountability.

    Conclusion

    • The Supreme Court’s forthcoming decision on legislators’ immunity from bribery charges holds significant ramifications for India’s legal landscape.
    • Balancing constitutional provisions, legislative intent, and anti-corruption imperatives, the court’s ruling will shape the accountability framework for lawmakers and the integrity of the legislative process.

  • Resolving Indigenous Issues: Tripartite Agreement in Tripura

    In the news

    • A Tripartite agreement was signed between the Government of India, the government of Tripura, and the Tipraha Indigenous Progressive Regional Alliance (TIPRA).
    • This marks a significant step towards addressing the longstanding issues faced by the indigenous population of Tripura.

    Ethno-Political Demands in Tripura: Historical Context

    • Demographic Shifts: Tripura has witnessed significant demographic changes, with indigenous tribes facing marginalization due to influxes of refugees from East Pakistan.
    • Marginalization of the Locals: This demographic shift has eroded the indigenous population’s socio-political influence and land rights over time.
    • Ethnic Tensions: Ethnic conflicts and insurgency have further exacerbated tensions between indigenous tribes and non-tribal communities, leading to demands for greater autonomy and recognition of tribal rights.
    • Revival of Ethnic Nationalism: In recent years, ethnic nationalism has been resurgent, particularly through the demand of Greater Tipraland, which seeks to unite indigenous tribes under a common identity and advocate for their collective interests.

    Demand for Greater Tipraland

    • Enhanced Autonomy: The core objective of Greater Tipraland is to secure greater autonomy for indigenous tribes within Tripura, allowing them to govern their affairs and preserve their cultural heritage.
    • Recognition of Tribal Rights: TIPRA’s demands include linguistic recognition, economic empowerment, and political representation for indigenous communities, ensuring their rights are safeguarded and respected.
    • Geographical Extent: The proposed Greater Tipraland encompasses not only the Tripura Tribal Areas Autonomous District Council (TTAADC) but also extends to tribal populations residing outside designated tribal areas, including those in neighboring states and Bangladesh.

    Constitutional Framework for Such Demands

    • Constitutional Provisions: Articles 2 and 3 of the Indian Constitution provide the legal framework for the creation of new states and the alteration of state boundaries. TIPRA seeks to leverage these provisions to advocate for the establishment of Greater Tipraland.
    • Regional Representation: Through political advocacy and grassroots mobilization, TIPRA aims to garner support for its demands within the legislative and executive branches of government, both at the state and national levels.
    • Challenges and Opportunities: While constitutional avenues exist for pursuing Greater Tipraland, navigating political complexities and addressing competing interests pose significant challenges. However, TIPRA sees these challenges as opportunities to engage in dialogue and build consensus around its agenda.

    Socio-Political Dynamics

    • Coalition Building: TIPRA’s emergence as a major political force has reshaped Tripura’s political landscape, with alliances and partnerships forming to advance shared objectives, including the pursuit of Greater Tipraland.
    • Opposition Criticism: Opposition parties, such as the Communist Party of India (Marxist), have criticized TIPRA’s demands as politically motivated, highlighting broader ideological divisions and electoral dynamics.
    • Public Support: TIPRA’s demands have garnered widespread public support, particularly among indigenous communities, who see Greater Tipraland as a pathway to empowerment and self-determination.

    Conclusion

    • The demand for Greater Tipraland encapsulates the aspirations of Tripura’s indigenous tribes for self-governance, cultural preservation, and socio-economic empowerment.
    • While challenges remain, the pursuit reflects a broader movement towards inclusive governance and recognition of indigenous rights in India’s northeastern region.

  • Defamation in the Digital Age: The Case of Arvind Kejriwal

    In the news

    Try this question from CS Mains 2014:

    What do understand by the concept of “freedom of speech and expression”? Does it cover hate speech also? Why do films in India stand on a slightly different plane from other forms of expression? Discuss.

    What is the Right to Free Speech?

    • Freedom: Article 19(1) (a) guarantees the freedom of speech and expression to all citizens. It is the first condition of liberty and plays an important role in forming public opinion.
    • Restrictions: As per Article 19(2), restrictions can be imposed upon the freedom of speech and expression in the interests of:
    1. Sovereignty and integrity of India,
    2. Security of the state,
    3. Friendly relations with foreign states,
    4. Public order, decency or morality, or
    5. In relation to contempt of court,
    6. Defamation, or
    7. Incitement to an offense
    • Online Discourse: The proliferation of social media platforms necessitates a nuanced understanding of free speech rights in the digital realm, balancing individual liberties with societal interests.
    • Immunity for Politicians: For politicians, while they enjoy the right to free speech, they are also subject to certain limitations. Criticism of the government or its policies is generally allowed as long as it does not incite violence or hatred.

    Legal Conundrum over Digital Defamation

    • Background: Kejriwal faced defamation charges for retweeting a video by a YouTuber Dhruv Rathee, alleging defamatory statements against the BJP’s IT cell.
    • Legal Proceedings: The Delhi High Court upheld the summons issued to Kejriwal, citing the widespread impact of retweets by public figures.
    • Constitutional Considerations: The right to free speech, protected under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution, is subject to reasonable restrictions, including defamation laws under Article 19(2).
    • Retweeting vs. Endorsement: The court’s intervention underscores the distinction between retweeting and endorsing content. While retweeting may not always signify endorsement, public figures are held to a higher standard of responsibility for their online actions.
    • Defamation Laws: Indian law, as delineated in Section 499 of the Indian Penal Code, criminalizes statements intended to harm an individual’s reputation. However, applying these laws to online communication poses unique challenges.

    Legal Precedents and Interpretations

    • Shreya Singhal vs. Union of India (2015): Section 66A of The IT Act, 2000, had criminalised sending “offensive messages” utilizing “a computer resource or a communication device”. This provision was quashed by the SC given the ambiguity in the definition of the term “offensive”.
    • Subramanian Swamy vs. Union of India (2016): The Supreme Court affirmed the constitutionality of criminal defamation laws, balancing the right to reputation with freedom of expression.
    • Kaushal Kishore vs. Union of India (2017): The Court clarified that additional restrictions on free speech must align with Article 19(2) and cannot be arbitrarily imposed.

    Implications for Online Discourse

    • Scope of Defamation: Online retweets amplify the dissemination of allegedly defamatory content, raising questions about liability and accountability.
    • Responsibility of Public Figures: Public figures like Kejriwal face heightened scrutiny for their online activities, given their influence and reach on social media platforms.

    Conclusion

    • This defamation case underscores the evolving dynamics of communication in the digital age.
    • As online discourse continues to shape public opinion, striking a balance between freedom of expression and legal safeguards against defamation remains a pressing challenge.
    • The Supreme Court’s intervention provides an opportunity to reassess existing laws and norms governing online speech, ensuring that rights and responsibilities are harmonized in the digital realm.

  • Appointment of Lokpal chairperson

    Why in the News?
    Recently, the former SC judge A.M. Khanwilkar has been appointed as Lokpal chairperson.

    More details on the news:

    • The Lokpal has been working without its regular Chief after Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghose completed his term on May 27, 2022. Justice Pradip Kumar Mohanty, a judicial member of the Lokpal, is currently the acting chairperson.
    • Former High Court judges Lingappa Narayana Swamy, Sanjay Yadav and Ritu Raj Awasthi have been appointed as judicial members of the Lokpal.

    About Lokpal:

    • The Lokpal is established up under the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act 2013 to investigate corruption allegations against public functionaries.
    • Former Supreme Court Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghose assumed office as the first Lokpal chairperson in March 2019.
    • India is a signatory to the United Nations Convention against Corruption. The establishment of Lokpal reflects the government’s commitment to clean and responsive governance by combating corruption.

    Composition of Lokpal:

    • The Lokpal consists of a chairperson and eight members – four judicial and four non-judicial.
    • Appointed by the President of India for a 5-year term or until they reach 70 years of age, whichever comes first.
    • Appointment Process: The President appoints the Chairperson and Members based on recommendations from a Selection Committee comprising the Prime Minister, Speaker of the House of the People, Leader of Opposition in the House of the People, Chief Justice of India or a nominated Supreme Court Judge, and an eminent jurist nominated by the President.

     Lokpal’s Jurisdiction:

    • The Lokpal investigates corruption allegations against current or former Prime Ministers, Union Ministers, Members of Parliament, and officials in Groups A, B, C, and D of the Union Government.
    • It extends to chairpersons, members, officers, and directors of entities established by an Act of Parliament or funded by the Union or State government.
    • The jurisdiction includes societies, trusts, or bodies receiving foreign contributions exceeding ₹10 lakh (approximately US$14,300 as of 2019)

  • Rare Diseases Care in India: Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities

    In the news

    What are Rare Diseases?

    • Global Perspective: Rare diseases are defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as often debilitating lifelong diseases or disorders with a prevalence of 1 or less, per 1,000 population.
    • National Context: While India lacks a standardized definition, the Organisation of Rare Diseases – India suggests defining a disease as rare if it affects 1 in 5,000 people or less.

    Rare Diseases: Key Facts and Figures

    • India issued its first National Policy on Rare Diseases in March 2021, offering comprehensive strategies for prevention and management.
    • Less than 5% of rare diseases have therapies available in India, yet they affect nearly 1/5th of the population.
    • The Union Government allocated ₹50 lakh per patient for rare diseases treatment, but only approximately 49% of the allocated funds have been utilized.
    • There are approximately 7,000-8,000 rare diseases in India, with new diseases continually being identified and reported.

     

    National Policy on Rare Diseases, 2021: Highlights

    • Comprehensive Approach: This Policy offers a holistic framework encompassing prevention, management, and treatment strategies tailored to the unique needs of patients.
    • Financial Support: Recognizing the financial burden on patients, the policy aims to lower the exorbitant costs of treatment through targeted interventions and support mechanisms.
    • Research Focus: Emphasizing indigenous research, the policy lays the foundation for bolstering research initiatives in the field of rare diseases, fostering innovation and discovery.

    Other Initiatives in India

    • National Hospital-Based Registry: A pivotal component of the policy, the establishment of a national registry of rare diseases promises to provide invaluable epidemiological data, informing targeted interventions and resource allocation.
    • Early Screening and Prevention: The creation of Nidan Kendras aims to enhance early detection and prevention efforts, crucial for improving patient outcomes and reducing disease burden.
    • Capacity Building: Strengthening secondary and tertiary health facilities at Centres of Excellence underscores the commitment to enhancing healthcare infrastructure and service delivery.

    Challenges and Imperatives

    • Defining Rare Diseases: Despite significant progress, India lacks a standardized definition of rare diseases, necessitating clarity to guide policy and resource allocation effectively.
    • Funding Utilization: Concerns arise over the underutilization of allocated funds, highlighting the urgency to streamline resource allocation and enhance accountability mechanisms.
    • Patient Advocacy: Rare diseases patient advocacy groups play a pivotal role in advocating for timely access to treatment and sustainable funding support, urging policymakers and healthcare providers to prioritize patient-centric initiatives.

    Way Forward

    • Sustainable Funding: Ensuring sustainable funding support for rare diseases treatment is paramount to safeguarding patient well-being and fostering equitable access to care.
    • National Registry Implementation: Accelerating the establishment of a hospital-based national registry is imperative to harness the power of data-driven decision-making and advance rare diseases research.
    • Multidisciplinary Care: The creation of comprehensive care centers, coupled with initiatives to support caregivers, represents a crucial step towards enhancing patient outcomes and fostering a supportive healthcare ecosystem.

    Conclusion

    • As India commemorates World Rare Diseases Day, it stands at a pivotal juncture in its journey towards rare diseases care and advocacy.
    • By embracing a collaborative and patient-centric approach, India can surmount existing challenges, paving the way for a future where every individual affected by a rare disease receives the care and support they deserve.

    Try this PYQ from CSP 2014:

    Consider the following diseases

    1. Diphtheria
    2. Chickenpox
    3. Smallpox

    Which of the above diseases has/have been eradicated in India?

    (a) 1 and 2 only

    (b) 3 only

    (c) 1, 2 and 3

    (d) None

     

    [wpdiscuz-feedback id=”p3avfkfd93″ question=”Please leave a feedback on this” opened=”1″]Post your responses here.[/wpdiscuz-feedback]