💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (August Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF

GS Paper: GS2

  • Places in news: Julian Felipe Reef

    Julian Felipe Reef

    Central Idea

    • The Philippines confirmed that more than 135 Chinese vessels made incursion on Julian Felipe Reef (also known as Whitsun Reef), a place off its coast.

    About Julian Felipe Reef

    • Julian Felipe Reef is part of the Spratly Islands, located in the West Philippine Sea, a portion of the South China Sea.
    • It lies within the Philippines’ exclusive economic zone.
    • It is a large boomerang-shaped shallow coral reef.

    Recent Dispute

    • The reef gained international attention in early 2021 when a large number of Chinese vessels, described by the Philippines as maritime militia, were spotted at the reef.
    • It is subject to a territorial dispute involving several countries, primarily the Philippines, China, and Vietnam.
    • The Philippines claims the Reef as part of its territory, specifically within its 200-nautical-mile exclusive economic zone, under the UNCLOS.
    • This dispute is part of the larger and complex South China Sea territorial disputes involving various countries in the region.
    • The Philippines has sought international arbitration under UNCLOS to assert its claims.
  • Centre approves fourth phase roll-out of GIAN Scheme

    Central Idea

    • The Ministry of Education is preparing to restart the fourth phase of Global Initiative of Academic Networks (GIAN) scheme.

    Global Initiative of Academic Networks (GIAN)

    • The GIAN was initiated in 2015.
    • It is a project under the Ministry of Education.
    • Coordinating Body: IIT Kharagpur
    • Purpose: To harness the expertise of international scientists and entrepreneurs, fostering their involvement with Indian higher education institutions.
    • This initiative aims to enhance India’s academic resources, speed up quality improvements, and raise India’s scientific and technological standards to a globally competitive level.

    Key Components of GIAN

    • Foreign experts receive an honorarium to cover their travel and other expenses.
    • These international experts/faculties conduct short-term courses in Indian institutions.
    • Initially aimed at fostering India-USA collaborations, the program later expanded its reach.
    • Course durations vary, ranging from a minimum of one week to a maximum of three weeks.
    • Foreign experts can receive a total payment of up to US$ 8000 (~ ₹7 lakh) for 12 to 14 hours of teaching and up to US$ 12000 (~ ₹12 lakh) for 20 to 28 hours, covering their travel and honorarium.
  • Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes: How Henry Kissinger tricked the world

    In Vietnam, Henry Kissinger was worse than a fraud | The Hill

    Central idea

    Henry Kissinger’s enigmatic legacy, spanning 80 years, encapsulates both admiration and criticism, depicting him as a “miracle man” and a “confidence man.” His influence on post-World War II global affairs prompts reflection on the intricate dynamics of power and diplomacy, posing ethical questions about leadership.

    Key Highlights:

    • Henry Kissinger’s Impact: Henry Kissinger, a pivotal figure in post-World War II global affairs, has left an indelible mark, often hailed as a “miracle man” but critiqued as a “confidence man.”
    • Confidence Man Persona: Described as immensely talented and charming, Kissinger projected an aura of indispensability, successfully ingraining himself in the power structures globally for nearly 80 years.
    • Ambiguous Morality: The term “confidence man” encapsulates Kissinger’s ability to project charm while potentially having a morally hollow core, raising questions about the ethical dimensions of his actions.
    • Longevity and Influence: Despite controversies and criticisms, Kissinger’s influence endured, evident in his 100th birthday gala hosting the world’s elite and maintaining access to leaders like President Xi even in his later years.

    Key Challenges:

    • Moral Ambiguity: Kissinger’s approach to power and diplomacy raises ethical concerns, as he seemed more inclined towards realpolitik and a will to power than moral considerations.
    • Impact on Global Conflicts: The decisions and actions condoned by Kissinger, such as the delayed peace agreement in Vietnam and support for controversial military interventions, are linked to significant human suffering and casualties.

    Key Phrases:

    • Confidence Man: A term used to characterize Kissinger’s charismatic yet potentially morally questionable persona, emphasizing his knack for presenting himself as indispensable.
    • Will to Power: Kissinger’s approach to diplomacy is seen as a will to power, prioritizing the acquisition and maintenance of power as a measure of success.

    Key Quotes:

    • Eqbal Ahmad’s Assessment: “Kissinger was not a miracle man. He was a confidence man.”
    • Kissinger’s Perspective: “There are two kinds of realists: Those who manipulate facts and those who create them.”

    Key Examples and References:

    • Crimes and Controversies: Kissinger’s involvement in delaying the Vietnam Peace Agreement, bombing of Cambodia, ignorance of the East Pakistan genocide, and support for interventions like in East Timor and Argentina.
    • Greg Grandin’s Estimate: Historian Greg Grandin approximates around four million deaths attributable to Kissinger’s decisions.

    Critical Analysis:

    • Moral Objectivity: Kissinger’s approach challenges the conventional moral objectives associated with realism, portraying power as the ultimate measure of success.
    • Survival Mentality: The analysis suggests that Kissinger’s worldview was shaped by a fear of powerlessness, instilled by the European experience, driving him to prioritize power at any cost.

    Way Forward:

    • Reflection on Morality: Evaluating the moral implications of diplomatic actions, emphasizing a balance between realism and ethical considerations in global affairs.
    • Global Accountability: Reflecting on Kissinger’s legacy prompts a broader discussion on holding powerful figures accountable for decisions that impact millions of lives.
  • On Constitution Day, more people-friendly laws

    Simplifying the law for the citizens of India

    Central idea

    The Indian government, led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, is actively simplifying legal language to promote “Access to Justice,” making legal texts more understandable for every citizen. This strategic initiative, aligned with constitutional principles, addresses historical ambiguities and leverages technology to enhance accessibility, contributing to global legal recognition and fostering a transformative journey toward inclusive justice.

    Key Highlights:

    • Legal Language Simplification: The Indian government, led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, is undertaking a mission to simplify legal language, aligning with the vision of “Access to Justice” and aiming to make legal texts more accessible to the common citizen.
    • Constitutional Principle: The initiative reflects the constitutional principle that legal language should be understandable to every citizen, emphasizing the importance of ensuring citizens comprehend their rights and responsibilities.
    • Correction of Ambiguities: The government is addressing historical ambiguities in legal language, such as those in Sections 213 and 214 of the IPC, to enhance legal precision and effective enforcement, eliminating potential loopholes.
    • Global Recognition: The government’s commitment to simplifying legal language has gained international recognition, positioning India as a forward-thinking adopter of progressive measures for legal accessibility.
    • Digital Transformation: The simplification efforts align with the Digital India campaign, leveraging technology to enhance accessibility, with online platforms and digital resources making legal information more readily available.

    Key Challenges:

    • Historical Complexities: Addressing historical intricacies in legal language poses a challenge, requiring thorough examination and correction of ambiguities that have persisted over time.
    • Public Engagement: While seeking public input in the simplification process is a positive step, ensuring effective public engagement and capturing diverse perspectives can be challenging.

    Key Phrases:

    • Access to Justice: The overarching vision guiding the simplification initiative, aiming to remove barriers of legal complexity that hinder the common citizen’s understanding of legal texts.
    • Legal Empowerment: The goal of simplification extends beyond language, aiming to empower citizens with legal knowledge, fostering a sense of legal empowerment among the diverse population.

    Key Quotes:

    • “We must see that the constitution is not only passed by the Constituent Assembly but that it is also worked by the common people of the country.” – B R Ambedkar
    • “The government envisions a legal landscape where language is not a barrier but a bridge to justice.”

    Critical Analysis:

    • The reduction in legal disputes due to misunderstandings and misinterpretations underscores the positive impact of the simplification initiatives in fostering a clearer legal framework.

    Way Forward:

    • Continue the integration of plain language drafting principles into legal education to nurture a generation of legal professionals capable of navigating legal intricacies with clarity and precision.
    • Sustain efforts to engage the public in the simplification process, ensuring diverse perspectives are considered for comprehensive legal accessibility.
    • Monitor and evaluate the impact of simplification on reducing legal disputes and enhancing India’s global economic competitiveness.
    • Explore additional measures, such as comprehensive glossaries in multiple languages, to further enhance the understanding of legal language among citizens.
  • Improving the capability of the Indian state

     

    Yes, prime minister

    Central Idea:

    The Indian state faces a paradox of being too burdensome in bureaucracy yet too small in terms of personnel. The focus should shift from the size of the state to addressing issues of perverse incentives, skill gaps, and institutional constraints for effective governance.

    Key Highlights:

    • Bureaucratic Challenges: Setting up businesses or homes in urban areas in India involves navigating a complex web of licenses, permits, and clearances, reflecting the bureaucratic thicket that hinders efficiency.
    • State Size Discrepancy: While India has a relatively small number of civil servants per capita and a lower public sector share in employment, it struggles with challenges in providing essential services and infrastructure.
    • Perverse Incentives: The root cause of governance inefficiency lies in perverse incentives within public institutions, hindering policymakers and officials from making and implementing effective policies.
    • Need for Delegation: Lessons from countries like Australia and Malaysia suggest that separating policymaking and implementation responsibilities expedites execution and encourages innovations, improving program outcomes.
    • Technocratic Gap: The lack of technocratic skills at the policymaking level results in substantial outsourcing to consultancy firms, revealing a gap that needs to be addressed for effective governance.

    Key Challenges:

    • Technocratic Skill Deficiency: The Indian bureaucratic system lacks technocratic skills, leading to significant outsourcing of crucial tasks to consultancy firms, highlighting a need for internal capability building.
    • Policy Failures: Both proponents and critics of a larger state miss the fundamental issue of perverse incentives and skill gaps, contributing to policy failures across various sectors.

    Key Phrases:

    • People-Thin, Process-Thick State: Describes the Indian state as lacking in personnel but burdened with complex processes, emphasizing the need for a shift in focus from size to efficiency.
    • Perverse Incentives: Highlights the negative motivations within public institutions that hinder sound policymaking and implementation.

    Key Quotes for good marks:

    • The main problem, however, is the perverse incentives created by public institutions and the skill gap among officials.”
    • “Both sides to the debate are missing something fundamental.”

    Anecdotes:

    • National Highways Authority of India: The example of the NHAI, where policymaking and execution are separated, showcases the effectiveness of delegation in reducing delays and cost overruns.

    Critical Analysis:

    • Audits and Oversight: The focus on compliance over policy objectives due to narrowly scoped audits by oversight agencies hampers effective decision-making, causing delays and disputes.

    Way Forward:

    Implementing institutional reforms, such as separating policymaking and implementation, enhancing technocratic skills, and sensitizing oversight agencies to contextual policy decisions, can improve state capability.

  • Ram Madhav writes: New India’s diplomacy – nimble and forthright

    Ram Madhav writes: New India's diplomacy – nimble and forthright | The  Indian Express

    Central idea

    India’s foreign policy has evolved, becoming more assertive and nimble. Smart oneliners and proactive diplomacy define its approach, gaining global recognition. Challenges include countering forces threatening India’s integrity, and the focus is on strategic autonomy and assertive engagement on the world stage.

    Key Highlights:

    • Diplomatic Nimbleness: Diplomacy requires swift actions and nimbleness, moving away from decades of numbness and indecision in India’s foreign policy.
    • Policy Shift in the Last Decade: India’s foreign policy underwent a significant shift in the last decade, marked by assertiveness, smart oneliners, and firm actions.
    • Global Recognition: India’s articulation on the world stage, including smart oneliners, gained global recognition and forced the world to take notice of its diplomatic stance.
    • Strategic Autonomy: India’s foreign policy is now characterized by strategic autonomy, resolute responses, and a willingness to take risks.
    • Jaishankar’s Diplomacy Principles: Foreign Minister S Jaishankar’s straightforward oneliners have become essential principles in bilateral and international diplomacy.
    • India-China Relations: Jaishankar’s emphasis on “mutual sensitivity, mutual respect, and mutual interest” forms the basis for the new bilateralism between India and China.
    • Doklam and Eastern Ladakh Standoffs: India’s proactive diplomacy combined with strong ground posturing in Doklam and Eastern Ladakh showcased a policy shift in dealing with such situations.
    • Response to Canadian Accusations: India’s determined response to Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau’s accusations demonstrated the country’s resolve in the face of baseless allegations.
    • Expectations from Allies: India, as the world’s largest democracy, expects friendly countries not to allow their territory to be misused by forces threatening its integrity.

    Key Challenges:

    • Misuse of Territory: India faces challenges from forces openly threatening its dismemberment and seeking shelter in other countries, leading to expectations that allies act against such forces.

    Key Terms and Phrases:

    • Smart Oneliners: Brief and impactful statements by leaders shaping important diplomatic principles.
    • Proactive Diplomacy: Taking initiative in diplomatic efforts to address challenges.
    • Strategic Autonomy: Ability to make independent decisions in alignment with national interests.
    • Bilateralism: Development of relationships and cooperation between two countries.
    • Policy Shift: Significant change in the approach and principles of foreign policy.

    Key Quotes:

    • “Smart oneliners” by leaders, far from being abstruse, turned out to be important policy mantras.
    • “Today’s era is not of war,” resonated well with world leaders, finding its way into the G-20 declaration in 2022.

    Key Statements:

    • India’s leadership stands shoulder-to-shoulder with leading global powers, making PM Modi and FM Jaishankar influential figures in world diplomacy.

    Key Examples and References:

    • India’s response to Canadian accusations demonstrated its determination and refusal to accept baseless allegations.

    Key Facts and Data:

    • India’s foreign policy marked by strategic autonomy, resolute responses, and a willingness to take risks.
    • India’s proactive diplomacy in Doklam and Eastern Ladakh showcased a policy shift in dealing with international challenges.

    Critical Analysis:

    • India’s nimble and forthright diplomacy brings a new assertiveness on the world stage.
    • The shift towards proactive diplomacy and smart oneliners has garnered global recognition and respect.
    • India’s expectations from allies to act against forces threatening its integrity underline its diplomatic priorities.

    Way Forward:

    • Continue proactive diplomacy and assertive foreign policy to protect national interests.
    • Collaborate with allies to address challenges posed by forces threatening India’s integrity.
    • Maintain strategic autonomy while actively engaging with global powers in diplomatic initiatives.
    • Leverage the influence gained on the world stage to further India’s interests and contribute to global stability.
  • Is the emerging global order bipolar?

     

    The Emerging Global Order Bipolar

    Central idea

    The world order is shifting, with the U.S. leading but China rising fast. India needs to navigate complex relations, address internal challenges, and focus on economic and military growth for a strong role globally. Amid global conflicts, balancing alliances is crucial for India’s position in the evolving geopolitical landscape.

    Key Highlights:

    • Global Order Dynamics: Shifting landscape with China’s rise, Russian challenges, and the emergence of middle powers like India.
    • Asymmetric Bipolarity: Viewing the world order as asymmetric bipolarity, where the U.S. remains pre-eminent but China rapidly advances.
    • China’s Impact: Unprecedented economic and military growth redefines international power dynamics.

    Key Challenges:

    • Russia-China Nexus: The war in Ukraine strengthens Russia-China ties, posing strategic challenges for India.
    • Global Security Complexities: Conflicts in Eastern Europe and West Asia contribute to a multifaceted global security landscape.
    • Diplomatic Maneuvering: Navigating complex relations with the U.S., China, and Russia amid evolving global power dynamics.

    Key Terms and Phrases:

    • Asymmetric Bipolarity: Understanding the dynamics of uneven power distribution in the current world order.
    • People’s Power: The 21st century characterized by unprecedented connectivity, interactions, and global integration.
    • Military-Industrial Complex: The influence of industries producing destructive weapons on global violence.
    • Two-Front Dilemma: China’s strategic challenge, facing pressures in the Western Pacific and the Line of Actual Control.
    Key Quotes and Anecdotes for extra marks:

     

    “The present world order is in a state of flux, with asymmetric bipolarity as a defining feature.”

    “China’s GDP growth from $300 billion in 1990 to $19.3 trillion today is a historic shift in global power dynamics.”

    “India must acknowledge China as a long-term competitor, addressing power asymmetry through comprehensive national growth.”

    “Global violence is fueled by the military-industrial complex spreading instruments of death and destruction.”

    Key Statements and Examples:

    • Russia’s Pivot: Economic sanctions and the Ukraine conflict drive Russia towards closer ties with China.
    • India’s Diplomatic Complexities: Balancing trade ties with China and managing strategic challenges with the U.S. and Russia.
    • China’s Economic Surge: Unprecedented GDP growth influencing global power dynamics and necessitating India’s strategic response.

    Key Facts and Data:

    • China’s GDP Growth: A remarkable shift from $300 billion to $19.3 trillion in the last four decades.
    • India-China Trade: Standing at $138 billion, showcasing the intricate nature of bilateral relations.
    • War in Ukraine: Ongoing for the past 20 months, contributing to evolving geopolitical dynamics.

    Critical Analysis:

    • Recognition of Asymmetric Bipolarity: Acknowledging and adapting to the current world order’s uneven power distribution.
    • Comprehensive National Growth: Emphasizing India’s need to strengthen its comprehensive national power amid power asymmetry with China.
    • Global Relations Management: Recognizing and addressing challenges in India’s diplomatic strategy amidst evolving global dynamics.

    Way Forward:

    • Internal Strengthening: Addressing internal fault lines, fostering societal cohesiveness, and focusing on comprehensive national growth.
    • Strategic External Balancing: Balancing relations with the U.S. to maintain China’s two-front dilemma and preserving India’s strategic autonomy.
    • Advocacy for Global Disarmament: Addressing the root issue of the military-industrial complex, promoting global disarmament for a more peaceful world.
  • Gujral Doctrine of Foreign Policy and its Significance

    Gujral Doctrine

    Central Idea: Remembering IK Gujral

    • Date: November 30 marks the 11th death anniversary of IK Gujral, India’s 12th Prime Minister.
    • Tenure: Gujral’s tenure as Prime Minister was less than a year, often overshadowed in discussions about India’s heads of government.
    • Unique Contribution: He is notably recognized for the ‘Gujral Doctrine’, a distinctive foreign policy approach named after him.

    Understanding the Gujral Doctrine

    • Background: Before becoming Prime Minister, Gujral served as the External Affairs Minister twice, during which he formulated his foreign policy approach.
    • Five Principles: Outlined in a speech at Chatham House, London, the doctrine emphasized-
    1. Non-reciprocity in relations with neighbors like Nepal, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Maldives, and Sri Lanka,
    2. Non-use of territory against each other,
    3. Non-interference in internal affairs,
    4. Respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity, and
    5. Peaceful bilateral negotiations for dispute resolution.
    • Exclusion of Pakistan: Notably, Pakistan was not included in the list of countries for non-reciprocal relations.
    • Philosophy: The doctrine was based on leveraging India’s size and influence in South East Asia through a non-domineering attitude and continuous dialogue, even with Pakistan.

    Successes of the Gujral Doctrine

    • Strengthening Regional Trust: The doctrine enhanced trust and cooperation with India’s neighbors.
    • Key Achievements: Notable successes include the signing of a 30-year water treaty with Bangladesh and positive developments in relations with Bhutan and Nepal.
    • Legacy: Successive Prime Ministers, despite differing political ideologies, continued to follow aspects of this doctrine.

    Criticism and Limitations

    • Perceived Leniency: Gujral faced criticism for being too lenient, particularly towards Pakistan, potentially leaving India vulnerable to future threats.
    • Perception in Pakistan: Some in Pakistan viewed the doctrine as an Indian strategy to isolate Islamabad.

    Gujral’s Personal Influence on the Doctrine

    • Background: Born in undivided Punjab and a participant in the freedom struggle, Gujral was known for his politeness and firmness in politics.
    • Stance during the Emergency: As Information Minister, he reportedly resisted Sanjay Gandhi’s orders to stifle the press.
    • International Relations Stance: Gujral was outspoken in his views, notably critiquing Britain’s suggestion to mediate over Kashmir.

    Legacy in India’s Foreign Policy

    • Impact on India’s Foreign Policy: Gujral’s approach left a lasting influence on India’s foreign policy, particularly in its relations with neighboring countries.
    • Recognition and Remembrance: His doctrine is remembered as a significant contribution to India’s diplomatic strategy, reflecting his understanding of regional dynamics and India’s role in South East Asia.

    Conclusion

    • The Gujral Doctrine stands as a testament to IK Gujral’s diplomatic acumen and his vision for India’s role in its immediate neighborhood.
    • His approach, emphasizing cooperation, non-reciprocity, and dialogue, continues to influence India’s foreign policy decisions and its relationships with neighboring countries.
  • US Allegations on India in Terrorist Execution Plot

    terror

    Central Idea

    • US Allegations: The US has implicated an Indian official in a plot to assassinate a Khalistani terrorist, raising serious concerns for the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA).
    • Indian Government’s Stance: While the MEA acknowledges the gravity of the situation, it refutes the claims of the Indian diplomat’s involvement.

    Backdrop and Timing of the Allegations

    • Concurrent Events: The indictment period coincided with PM Narendra Modi’s visit to the G7 and Quad leaders’ summit and the India-US Defence Industrial Cooperation Roadmap’s conclusion.
    • Profile of the Accused Official: Described as a “Senior Field Officer” with a background in security management, intelligence, and military training, the official is also noted to have served in the Central Reserve Police Force.

    terror

    Pre-Indictment Measures by India

    • Proactive Steps: Anticipating the indictment, India formed a high-level inquiry committee on November 18.
    • Committee Composition: Likely includes officials from intelligence, investigative, law enforcement agencies, and the MEA.
    • Prior Diplomatic Engagements: The indictment followed months of diplomatic and intelligence discussions between the US and India, including meetings between US NSA Jake Sullivan and NSA Ajit Doval, and CIA Director William Burns’ visit to India.

    India’s Diplomatic Response

    • Contrast with Canada’s Allegations: India’s response contrasts with its reaction to Canada’s allegations regarding the killing of another Khalistani separatist, Hardeep Singh Nijjar, where it accused Canada of being a “safe haven” for extremists.
    • Previous Incident with the US: Recalls the 2013 incident involving Devyani Khobragade (IFS), which led to diplomatic tensions but was later resolved.
    • Current Approach: India is showing restraint, prioritizing its relationship with the US, and aiming to prevent the situation from escalating into a diplomatic crisis.

    US-India Relations: A Complex Dynamic

    • Strategic and Values-Based Partnership: The relationship has evolved over decades, marked by significant trade and strategic interests, and a debate over shared values versus strategic interests.
    • Historical Perspective: The relationship has weathered various challenges, including the Nixon-Kissinger era, nuclear tests sanctions, and the Indo-US nuclear deal.

    Way Forward

    • Commitment to Investigation: India’s thorough investigation is crucial for maintaining its credibility and managing its relationship with the US.
    • Extradition Considerations: India must question why the US is not keen on extraditing a man facing terror charges to India.
    • Global Diplomatic Impact: The outcome will affect India’s relations with the “Five Eyes” intelligence partner countries.
    • India’s reputation: India’s reputation as a consistent and credible power is at stake, necessitating a wise and principled approach.

    Conclusion: Navigating a Diplomatic Tightrope

    • The Indian government faces a delicate diplomatic challenge in addressing the US allegations.
    • Balancing national integrity with maintaining robust international relations, especially with a key partner like the United States, is crucial for India’s diplomatic posture and global standing.
  • Narendra Modi writes: India’s G20 presidency, for the world

    Narendra Modi writes: India's G20 presidency, for the world | The Indian  Express

    Note for students: The writer is Prime Minister of India hence there is high possibility UPSC may use this for prelims, mains, interview and essay be aware and alert for these kind of highly valuable articles.

    Central idea

    India’s G20 presidency prioritized inclusivity, sustainable development, and climate action, offering an alternative to GDP-centric progress. The emphasis on the Global South’s concerns and achievements in digital infrastructure collaboration marked a departure from the status quo.

    Key Highlights:

    • India’s G20 presidency focused on inclusive, ambitious, action-oriented, and decisive strategies.
    • Inclusivity was a central theme, integrating the African Union and emphasizing the Global South’s concerns.
    • India introduced the Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) and a Green Development Pact for sustainable progress.
    • The G20 2023 Action Plan targeted SDGs, with a special emphasis on health, education, gender equality, and environmental sustainability.
    • Commitment to climate justice, equity, and significant financial support for developing countries were key features.

    Key Challenges:

    • Addressing conflicts, competition, and declining multilateralism.
    • Balancing development cooperation amid geopolitical tensions.
    • Navigating the transition from GDP-centric to human-centric progress.
    • Mobilizing substantial resources for climate and development financing.

    Key Terms:

    • Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam
    • New Delhi Leaders’ Declaration (NDLD)
    • Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
    • Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI)
    • Green Development Pact
    • Lifestyles for Sustainable Development (LiFE)
    • Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs)
    • Multilateral Development Banks

    Key Phrases:

    • “One Earth, One Family, One Future”
    • “Voice of the Global South Summit”
    • “People’s Presidency”
    • “Jan Bhagidari” (People’s participation)
    • “Digital Public Infrastructure Repository”
    • “Tripling of global renewable energy capacity by 2030”
    • “Climate justice and equity”
    • “Women’s Reservation Bill 2023”
    Key Quotes

     

    For value addition of mains answer they may come as essay topics as they are written by pm of our country. UPSC is very keen on selecting such type of content be focused and revise this article multiple times.

     

    “The interests of the few had to give way to the aspirations of the many.”

    “For the first time, there was a recognition of the quantum jump needed in the magnitude of development financing.”

    “It revitalised multilateralism, amplified the voice of the Global South, championed development, and fought for the empowerment of women everywhere.”

     

     

     

    Key Statements:

    • “Inclusivity has been at the heart of our presidency.”
    • “India sought to offer the world an alternative to the status quo, a shift from a GDP-centric to human-centric progress.”
    • “India’s Women’s Reservation Bill 2023 epitomizes our commitment to women-led development.”
    • “India’s G20 achieved 87 outcomes and 118 adopted documents, a marked rise from the past.”

    Key Examples and References:

    • The inclusion of the African Union in the G20.
    • ‘Voice of the Global South Summit.’
    • Digital innovations like Aadhaar, UPI, and Digilocker.
    • G20’s emphasis on climate-conscious consumption and planet-friendly production.
    • India’s leading role in UN reforms.

    Key Facts:

    • G20 achieved 87 outcomes and 118 adopted documents during India’s presidency.
    • The G20 Declaration calls for tripling global renewable energy capacity by 2030.
    • India’s Women’s Reservation Bill 2023 reserves one-third of parliamentary and state legislative assembly seats for women.
    • Developing countries require $5.9 trillion to fulfill their NDCs by 2030.

    Key Data:

    • The G20 reached 1.4 billion citizens through “Jan Bhagidari” events.

    Critical Analysis:

    India’s G20 presidency successfully navigated challenges, emphasizing inclusivity, sustainable development, and climate action. The presidency revitalized multilateralism and amplified the voice of the Global South, marking a significant shift in the global narrative.

    Way Forward:

    • Sustaining the momentum of inclusivity and global collaboration.
    • Implementing the G20 2023 Action Plan for accelerated progress on SDGs.
    • Continued advocacy for climate justice, equity, and financial support for developing nations.
    • Strengthening the role of Multilateral Development Banks for effective development financing.
    • Advancing UN reforms for a more equitable global order.