💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (August Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

GS Paper: GS2

  • India’s ASEAN Engagement and Upcoming Summits

    asean

    Central Idea

    • Prime Minister departed for Indonesia to participate in the 20th ASEAN-India summit and the 18th East Asia Summit (EAS) in Jakarta.
    • During the visit, he will meet with leaders from the ten ASEAN countries and attend the EAS, including leaders from ASEAN nations, Australia, China, India, Japan, New Zealand, South Korea, Russia, and the U.S.

    Why discuss this?

    • India-ASEAN relations have evolved significantly over the years, moving from a distant past to a robust partnership.

    Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)
    Established August 8, 1967
    Member Countries Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam
    Objective To promote political and economic cooperation and regional stability among member countries.
    Key Areas of Cooperation – Economic Integration

    – Political and Security Cooperation

    – Social and Cultural Cooperation
    Significance Promotes economic growth, stability, and peace in the Southeast Asian region. It is also a forum for diplomatic dialogue and conflict resolution.
    ASEAN Secretariat Jakarta, Indonesia (The ASEAN Secretariat is the organization responsible for coordinating ASEAN activities.)

     

    Evolution of India-ASEAN Relations

    • 1950s and Early 1960s: During this period, India played a significant role in supporting the decolonization efforts of Southeast Asian countries.
    • 1960s to 1980s: India maintained some distance from the region due to internal issues and viewed ASEAN as a product of the Cold War.
    • 1990s to 2010s: India adopted the ‘Look East Policy,’ leading to a full dialogue partnership with ASEAN in 1995 and becoming a full member of the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) in 1996.
    • 2010s to Present: India-ASEAN cooperation intensified with the ‘Act East Policy,’ resulting in the elevation to a Strategic Partnership in 2012 and a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership in 2022.

    Key Areas of Cooperation

    • Trade Relations: The India-ASEAN Free Trade Agreement (AIFTA) and substantial trade volumes have strengthened economic ties, with commodity trade reaching $98.39 billion in the period April 2021-February 2022.
    • Business & Investment: ASEAN is a major source of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) for India, with cumulative FDIs from ASEAN to India totaling $117.88 billion between 2000-2021. The ASEAN India-Business Council (AIBC) promotes collaboration between private sector players from India and ASEAN.
    • Socio-Cultural Cooperation: Cultural affinities between ASEAN and India foster people-to-people interactions through initiatives like student exchange programs.
    • ASEAN-India Projects: Collaboration in agriculture, science & technology, environment, renewable energy, and defense promotes mutual growth. The ASEAN-India S&T Development Fund (AISTDF) contributes $1 million to support joint collaborative R&D research projects.
    • Strategic Cooperation: Platforms like the ASEAN Post Ministerial Conference (ASEAN PMC) and ADMM-Plus facilitate dialogue on security issues.
    • Defense Cooperation: India is enhancing arms sales and defense ties with ASEAN countries to promote regional security, such as the recent approval by the Philippines for a USD 374 million purchase of the BrahMos shore-based anti-ship missile system in January 2022.
    • Technological Cooperation: ISRO’s collaboration supports ASEAN countries in space science and technology.
    • Connectivity: Projects like the India-Myanmar-Thailand Trilateral Highway and Kaladan Multimodal Project enhance regional connectivity.

    Why India Needs ASEAN?

    • Significant Trade & Commercial Relations: ASEAN is a major destination for India’s service sectors and a vital source of foreign investments.
    • Development of North East India: ASEAN provides an alternate route for India’s access to North Eastern India, facilitating development and strategic interests.
    • Countering Chinese Expansion: Strengthening ties with ASEAN countries helps India counter Chinese influence in the Indo-Pacific region.
    • Maritime Freedom: Collaboration with ASEAN ensures a free and peaceful Indo-Pacific region based on a rules-based order.
    • Facing Politico-security Challenges: Cooperation in addressing security threats like climate change, terrorism, and refugee crises benefits both sides.
    • Support for Indian Initiatives: ASEAN’s support is crucial for India’s success in regional policies and initiatives.
    • Emerging Market: India benefits from ASEAN’s agricultural and industrial products, while ASEAN relies on India’s demographic dividend.
    • Global Reforms: ASEAN’s global influence aligns with India’s vision for reforms in international forums.
    • Diaspora: Southeast Asia’s significant Indian diaspora fosters cultural ties and people-to-people relations.
    • Elevating India’s Global Status: Partnership with ASEAN enhances India’s geopolitical standing.

    Challenges to Stronger Cooperation

    • Large Trade Deficit: Trade imbalance and issues with the Free Trade Agreement (FTA) have impacted India’s economic relations with ASEAN, with the trade deficit rising from around $5 billion in FY11 to USD 21.8 billion in FY19.
    • Balancing China: ASEAN countries’ engagement with China and concerns over military capabilities impact the depth of cooperation with India.
    • Delays in Connectivity Projects: Long gestation periods for connectivity projects hinder progress.
    • Issues within ASEAN: Different political systems and human rights issues pose challenges to stronger cooperation.

    Way Forward

    • Enhance Trade Relations: Focus on the blue economy and sustainable development to boost economic ties.
    • Accelerate Connectivity Projects: Expedite the completion of infrastructure projects and build new trade and transport linkages.
    • Strengthen Regional Role: India must play a more prominent role in the region to address geopolitical challenges.
    • Establish Dedicated Departments: Dedicated departments under central ministries can facilitate better cooperation with ASEAN.

    Conclusion

    • India’s commitment to ASEAN signifies its strategic engagement with the Indo-Pacific region.
    • Despite challenges, enhancing cooperation in trade, connectivity, defence, and socio-cultural aspects can pave the way for mutual growth and regional peace.

  • Black Sea Grain Initiative to resume soon: Turkey

    black sea

    Central Idea

    • The Black Sea grain deal lapsed on July 17. Turkey now seeks to resume the treaty.
    • Russia though had not agreed to renew the deal, citing unmet promises and difficulties in its own agricultural exports due to Western sanctions.

    Black Sea Grain Initiative

    • The Initiative eased Russia’s naval blockade and saw the reopening of three key Ukrainian ports.
    • The UN and Turkey brokered the deal in July 2022, allowing cargo ships to travel between Ukrainian ports and undergo inspections to ensure they were not carrying arms.
    • The deal has been extended twice but is set to expire on July 17, 2023.
    • The agreement created procedures to safely export grain from certain ports to attempt to address the 2022 food crisis.
    • It provides a safe maritime humanitarian corridor for Ukrainian exports (particularly for food grains) from three of its key ports: Chornomorsk, Odesa and Yuzhny/Pivdennyi in the Black Sea.

    Outcomes of this deal

    • Approximately 9.8 million tonnes of grains have been shipped so far since the deal was brokered as per International Grains Council (IGC) Projections.
      • The IGC is an intergovernmental organization established in 1949. Its primary purpose is to promote cooperation and consultation on grains trade and related aspects globally.
      • India is an exporting member of the IGC.
    • The initiative has also been credited for having made a huge difference in the global cost of living crisis.

    Why was this deal launched?

    • Ukraine’s Role: Ukraine is a significant exporter of food grains, including wheat and corn, and contributes to the UN’s food aid programs.
    • Impact of Russian Invasion: Russia’s invasion and blockade of Ukrainian ports raised concerns about food security and soaring prices globally.

    Russia’s Opposition and Reasons

    • Claims of Unmet Promises: Russia argues that promises made under the deal have not been fulfilled, affecting its own agricultural exports and fertilizers due to Western sanctions.
    • Obstacles to Agricultural Exports: Russia faces challenges with payment platforms, insurance, shipping, and logistics, even though there are no direct restrictions on its agricultural products.
    • Frustration and Goodwill: Russian President expressed frustration and stated that Russia has shown goodwill in extending the deal but feels enough is enough.
    • Shift in Grain Destinations: Russia claims the deal was meant to ensure global food security, but Ukraine has mainly exported to high- and middle-income countries, while the UN notes that food prices have cooled down, benefiting poorer nations.

    Impact on Grain Exports and Production

    • Russian Wheat Export Dominance: Russia remains the world’s top wheat exporter, primarily targeting the Middle East, North Africa, and Central Asia.
    • Ukraine’s Declining Shipments: Ukraine’s grain shipments are projected to more than halve, with production at an 11-year low.
    • Shifting Markets: Ukraine’s grain markets have shifted from Asia and North Africa to Europe, driven by ease of shipment, causing a glut of Ukrainian grain and protests from farmers in Eastern European countries.

    International Grains Council

    • The International Grains Council (IGC) is an intergovernmental organization that oversees the Grains Trade Convention and aims to promote cooperation in the global grain trade. Established in 1949 as the International Wheat Council, it was renamed in 1995 to reflect its expanded scope.
    • India is a member of the International Grains Council (IGC), which is the intergovernmental organization that oversees the global grains trade.

    Back2Basics: Black Sea

    • Black Sea is bound by Ukraine to the north and northwest, Russia and Georgia to the east, Turkey to the south, and Bulgaria and Romania to the west.
    • It links to the Sea of Marmara through the Bosphorus and then to the Aegean through the Dardanelles.

    Significance of Black Sea for Russia

    • Black Sea has traditionally been Russia’s warm water gateway to Europe.
    • For Russia, the Black Sea is both a stepping stone to the Mediterranean.
    • It acts as a strategic buffer between NATO and itself.
    • It showcases the Russian power in the Mediterranean and to secure the economic gateway to key markets in southern Europe.
    • Russia has been making efforts to gain complete control over the Black Sea since the Crimean crisis of 2014.

  • Decoding the Nyaya Sanhita Bill

    What’s the news?

    • The government recently introduced three key penal bills in a bid to reform the justice system.

    Central Idea

    • The recent introduction of three penal bills in the Lok Sabha by the government, aimed at decolonizing the Indian justice system, is a significant step in the realm of legal reform. While this initiative is commendable, it is crucial to recognize that the process of law-making and reform requires careful consideration and empirical validation.

    Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Bill

    • This bill aims to replace the existing Indian Penal Code (IPC) of 1860.
    • The IPC defines crimes, sets out their elements, and prescribes corresponding penalties.
    • The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Bill seeks to update and modernize the criminal laws to better reflect evolving societal values and democratic aspirations.

    Why Public Participation Matters in Legal Reform?

    • The Colonial Legacy: Learning from Past Mistakes
      • The colonial penal law was replaced not due to inherent flaws but because it lacked participation from the Indian populace, imposing foreign ideas and values.
      • Recognizing the crucial need for broad public participation to avoid repeating this historical oversight
    • Macaulay’s Principle Revisited: Seeking Legal Certainty Through Debate
      • Reflecting on Thomas Babington Macaulay’s principle of “uniformity when you can have it, diversity where you must have it, but in all cases certainty.”
      • Emphasizing the goal of achieving equal and uniform application of the law through meaningful debate.
      • Stressing the significance of precise legal terminology for clarity and legal certainty.

    What constitutes undesirable behavior?

    • Changing Norms: The Evolution of Legal Definitions
      • Highlighting the evolving societal perceptions concerning behaviors deemed undesirable.
      • Citing examples like the transition of attempted suicide from a criminal offense to a recognized mental health issue under Section 115(1) of the Mental Health Care Act, 2017.
      • Examining the Supreme Court’s role in redefining adultery and its legal implications
    • From Offense to Health Issue: The Case of Attempted Suicide
      • Illustrating the transformation of attempted suicide from a crime to a mental health concern, reflecting a more compassionate and holistic approach.
    • Challenging Tradition: Adultery and the Supreme Court Decision
      • Analyzing the Supreme Court’s decision to redefine adultery and emphasizing the judiciary’s role in adapting to evolving social norms
    • The Call for Social Audit: Rethinking “Undesirable” Behavior
      • Advocating for a comprehensive social audit to redefine the concept of “undesirable” behavior, taking into account changing societal perspectives.
      • Stressing the importance of empirical analysis in this process.
    • Independent Oversight: The Need for Impartiality
      • underscoring the necessity of an independent and impartial body to conduct the social audit to ensure fairness and objectivity in evaluating behavioral norms.

    How to Balance Simplicity and Complexity in Penal Laws?

    • Simplification’s Promise: Streamlining the Legal Framework
      • Acknowledging efforts to simplify the legal framework through the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and highlighting potential benefits like enhanced clarity and efficiency in legal procedures.
    • The Challenge of Overload: Retaining and Adding Offenses
      • Addressing concerns about the risk of retaining and introducing new offenses, which could offset the advantages of simplification and potentially overwhelm the legal system.
    • Revisiting Special Laws: The Malimath Committee’s Proposal
      • Noting the proliferation of special penal laws post-Indian Penal Code to address emerging crimes.
      • Suggesting an evaluation of whether these should be incorporated into the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita or managed through existing special laws or a new composite law, as proposed by the Malimath Committee.

    Addressing Gender and Children’s Rights: What the Bill Says?

    • Constitutional Alignment: Article 15(3) and Article 51A(e)
      • Recognizing the alignment of the proposed Offenses Against Women and Children’ with the constitutional vision, specifically referencing Article 15(3) and Article 51A(e),
    • Outdated Notions: Analyzing Clause 63 on Marital Rape
      • Highlighting concerns with Clause 63, which excludes sexual intercourse between spouses above 18 from the definition of rape, and drawing parallels with colonial-era legal thinking
    • Contradictory Provisions: Clauses 20 and 21 vs. Juvenile Justice Act of 2015
      • Pointing out inconsistencies between retaining Clauses 20 and 21 in Chapter III (General Exceptions) and the philosophy of special laws for children outlined in Section 1(4) of the Juvenile Justice Act of 2015.

    What does the new penal law prioritize?

    • A Shift in Focus: Departing from the Colonial Framework
      • Recognizing a departure from the colonial chapter scheme that favored the interests of the ruling class over body and property offenses.
      • Placing bodily interests in Chapter VI, just before offenses against the state, indicating a significant shift in priorities.
    • Measuring against the Constitution: Article 13(2)
      • Raising questions about whether the proposed reforms will align with the constitutional vision enshrined in Article 13(2), which prohibits laws that infringe upon fundamental rights.
    • Upholding Values: Autonomy, Equality, and Fraternity
      • Highlighting the vital role of the proposed reforms in upholding principles of autonomy, equality, and fraternity as guaranteed by the Preamble of the Constitution

    Conclusion

    • The government’s initiative to reform the Indian justice system is laudable, but it must be accompanied by extensive public participation, a thorough examination of undesirable behavior, and a balanced approach to legal complexity. Only through careful consideration and a commitment to justice can the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Bill truly decolonize and rejuvenate the Indian justice system.

  • The implications of the expansion of BRICS

    What’s the news?

    • The 15th BRICS summit held in Johannesburg recently made headlines with its announcement to expand its membership.

    Central idea

    • The 15th BRICS summit in Johannesburg made waves in international diplomacy when it announced the invitation of six new members: Iran, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Egypt, Ethiopia, and Argentina. This move signifies BRICS’ commitment to challenging the West-dominated world order and building a more representative international system.

    Expanding BRICS: A New Global Landscape

    • The expansion of BRICS to include Iran, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Egypt, Ethiopia, and Argentina
    • It was reported that 40 countries have shown interest in BRICS’ membership, with 22 having submitted formal applications.
    • BRICS has been a platform for emerging economies to voice their dissatisfaction with Western-dominated global institutions like the World Bank, IMF, and UN.
    • At the Johannesburg summit, the UN Secretary General labeled these institutions of yesterday’s world, reflecting the need for change.
    • With the inclusion of new members, BRICS now represents 46% of the world’s population and 37% of the global GDP in PPP terms, surpassing the G-7.
    • This expansion also greatly impacts the energy sector, with the BRICS now accounting for 42% of global oil production.

    Significance of BRICS Expansion

    • Economic Clout: The BRICS’ share of global GDP in PPP terms rises from 31.5% to 37%, surpassing the G-7. This expansion creates a formidable economic bloc with the potential to shape global economic policies and trade dynamics.
    • Demographic Powerhouse: The BRICS now represent 46% of the world’s population, giving them significant demographic weight. This diverse population can influence global consumer markets and labor forces.
    • Energy Dominance: The inclusion of new members from energy-rich regions, especially West Asia, boosts BRICS’ role in global energy markets. It solidifies BRICS as a major player in shaping global energy policies.
    • Geo-Strategic Influence: West Asian members already have strong ties with BRICS countries, contributing to the group’s geo-strategic significance. Egypt and Ethiopia hold key positions in the Horn of Africa and the Red Sea region, adding to BRICS’ strategic reach.
    • Shared Political Views: BRICS members have historically shared political views on global issues. The new members’ alignment with these views strengthens BRICS’ collective stance on the United Nations, Middle East conflicts, and global terrorism.
    • Multipolar Advocacy: BRICS challenges the Western-dominated international order. The expansion reaffirms BRICS’ commitment to advocating for a multipolar world order and reforming global institutions.
    • Cooperative Opportunities: The inclusion of new members opens avenues for increased cooperation in areas such as trade, investment, infrastructure, and technology transfer. This expansion promotes South-South collaboration.
    • Global Balance Shift: BRICS’ expansion further shifts the global balance of power away from Western-dominated institutions. It elevates the influence of emerging economies in shaping global policies.

    BRICS’ Substantial Achievements

    • Consistent Declarations: BRICS leaders have met for over 15 years, consistently overcoming internal divisions and competitions to issue consensual “Declarations” at each summit. These declarations have expanded in content, reflecting the group’s evolving priorities and interests.
    • Focus on Specific Deliverables: The declarations have increasingly focused on specific deliverables, indicating BRICS’ commitment to achieving tangible outcomes. This shift from broad rhetoric to concrete action is a substantial achievement.
    • Intra-BRICS Cooperation: The Johannesburg Declaration emphasizes the importance of intra-BRICS cooperation. Member countries are committed to encouraging the use of local currencies in internal trade and financial transactions, promoting economic integration within the group.
    • Outreach to Developing Nations: BRICS recognizes its role in supporting other developing nations. The group aims to extend its cooperation beyond its borders, reaching out to other countries that share similar development challenges.
    • Shared Political Views: BRICS members have a history of sharing common political views on various global issues. This shared perspective strengthens their collective voice on matters such as the centrality of the United Nations, conflicts in the Middle East, and global terrorism.
    • Promoting Multipolarity: BRICS challenges the Western-dominated international order by advocating for a multipolar world. This advocacy represents a substantial achievement in pushing for reforms and greater representation for emerging economies in global institutions.

    Criticisms directed at the BRICS

    • Talk-Shop with No Vision: Some Western commentators have criticized BRICS as being a talk-shop with no clear shared vision or meaningful achievements. This criticism suggests that BRICS meetings and declarations may lack substance and practical outcomes.
    • Lack of Shared Vision: Critics argue that BRICS members have not demonstrated a cohesive or unified vision for the group’s role in global affairs. This criticism implies that the members may have divergent interests that hinder effective cooperation.
    • Limited Achievements: Some critics have suggested that BRICS has not achieved significant or tangible results in its over 15 years of existence. This criticism questions the group’s ability to translate its discussions into meaningful actions or outcomes.
    • Emerging Global Binary Divide: While not explicitly mentioned in the article, there is an implied criticism that BRICS may contribute to an emerging global binary divide or a new cold war between Western and non-Western nations. This view suggests that BRICS could exacerbate global divisions rather than promote cooperation.

    Outlook for Regional Affairs

    • West Asia:
    • The new BRICS members from West Asia, such as Saudi Arabia and the UAE, have pursued independent foreign policy paths since 2020.
    • Saudi Arabia, for instance, has actively engaged in de-escalation efforts, including ending the Qatar blockade in January 2021, establishing relations with Turkey, and initiating interactions with Iran in April 2021.
    • These diplomatic engagements culminated in a significant China-brokered accord with Iran in March of the following year.
    • Maritime Expansion: The UAE has also normalized ties with Iran and is actively expanding its maritime presence across key strategic regions, including the Gulf, the Gulf of Aden, the Red Sea, and the Horn of Africa. This maritime expansion underscores the UAE’s growing influence in these areas.

    Outlook for Global Affairs

    • Rejecting the Binary Divide:
    • In contrast to Western commentators who perceive an emerging global binary divide or a new cold war, India and other BRICS members reject this view.
    • They insist on asserting their strategic autonomy within a multipolar world order, rejecting the idea of being drawn into simplistic global power struggles.
    • Historical Significance:
    • A recent media report described the Johannesburg summit as a turning point in modern history.
    • This suggests that the expansion of BRICS, combined with its evolving role in global affairs, is seen as a pivotal and historic moment with profound implications for the contemporary international landscape.

    Conclusion

    • BRICS continues to assert its strategic autonomy and push for a multipolar world order, challenging Western-led international institutions. This expansion is a turning point in modern history, reflecting the evolving dynamics of global diplomacy.

  • One Nation, One Election: Prospects and Challenges

  • Progress track: Aatmanirbhar Bharat Rozgar Yojana (ABRY)

    Central Idea

    • The Aatmanirbhar Bharat Rozgar Yojana (ABRY) by the Central Government has outperformed its initial employment targets, proving its effectiveness in fostering job creation during the COVID-19 crisis.

    About Aatmanirbhar Bharat Rozgar Yojana (ABRY)

    Launch Introduced in November 2020
    Purpose As part of Atmanirbhar Bharat Package 3.0 to boost post-Covid-19 employment
    Government’s Contribution Subsidy for provident fund contributions in EPFO-registered organizations
    Coverage Up to 1000 employees: Both employee (12%) and employer (12%) contributions for two years

    Over 1000 employees: Employee (12%) contribution for two years
    Subsidy Disbursement Subsidy credited upfront to Aadhaar-linked EPFO accounts (UAN) of new employees
    Eligibility Criteria Establishments adding new employees compared to September 2020 reference base
    Target Beneficiaries Employees with monthly wages under Rs. 15,000 joining EPFO-registered establishments

    Individuals reemployed on or after October 1, 2020, who left jobs between March 1 and September 30, 2020

     Achievements and Numbers

    • The scheme, open for registrations until March 31, 2022, targeted around 7.18 million employees across India.
    • By July 31, 2023, ABRY had already exceeded its target, enrolling over 7.58 million new employees.
    • Benefiting 1,52,380 establishments with 60,44,155 new employees, the scheme disbursed benefits totaling Rs. 9,669.87 Crore.

  • Personalised Adaptive Learning (PAL) on DIKSHA Platform

    Central Idea

    • The National eGovernance Division (NeGD) plans to incorporate Personalised Adaptive Learning (PAL) into its existing Digital Infrastructure for Knowledge Sharing (DIKSHA) platform.
    • PAL offers individualized learning experiences based on students’ unique needs and abilities.

    DIKSHA 2.0 Portal

    • Diksha Portal was launched in 2017 to provide a digital platform to teachers giving them an opportunity to learn and train themselves and connect with the teacher community.
    • It serves as the National Digital Infrastructure for Teachers.
    • It aids teachers to learn and train themselves for which assessment resources will be available.
    • It houses digitized National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) textbooks, teaching videos, and practice questions.
    • It also has assistive technologies for learners with disabilities, but it’s a static content repository.

    Integration of PAL

    • NCERT seeks MeitY’s expertise in implementing PAL within DIKSHA.
    • PAL provides customized learning paths for each student based on their learning progress.
    • PAL can loop back students to basic concepts if they make mistakes, enhancing learning efficiency.

    Challenges and Implementations in States

    • PAL development involves categorizing and tagging content, potentially creating new material.
    • Chemistry, Mathematics, and Physics for Classes 9 to 12 are prioritized for PAL development.
    • Several states like Andhra Pradesh, Assam, and Haryana experimented with PAL, facing budget constraints.

  • HC allows Stem Cell Therapy for autistic kids

    stem cells

    Central Idea

    • The Delhi High Court granted permission for two children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) to undergo Stem Cell Therapy for their condition.
    • The court’s decision followed a challenge against the Ethics and Medical Registration Board’s (EMRB) recommendation against stem cell treatment for ASD.

    Understanding Stem Cells

    • Stem cells are the foundational cells that can differentiate into specialized cells with distinct functions.
    • Two main categories: pluripotent stem cells (can differentiate into various adult cells) and adult stem cells (tissue/organ-specific).
    • Pluripotent stem cells are found in embryos; reprogramming of adult cells leads to induced pluripotent stem cells.

    Stem Cells in Medicine

    • Stem cells’ regenerative properties make them valuable in regenerative medicine.
    • Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation treats conditions like leukaemia.
    • Challenges: Limited adult stem cells post-removal, focus on making them pluripotent.

    What is Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)?

    • ASD is a neurological and developmental disorder affecting communication, behaviour, and interactions.
    • Conventional therapies focus on symptom management, social skills training, behaviour analysis, and speech and occupational therapy.

    Potential of Stem Cell Therapy for ASD

    • Some experts suggest stem cells could enhance immune system regulation and neural connectivity in the brain.
    • Current clinical trials show mixed results; treatment is experimental, lacks sufficient data.
    • EMRB recommendations against stem cell therapy due to limited evidence, risks, side effects, and absence of established protocol.

    EMRB’s Concerns

    • EMRB’s recommendation stemmed from “predatory marketing” of stem cell therapy, giving false hope to parents about “curing” ASD.
    • The Delhi HC ruling doesn’t assess the general validity of stem cell therapy but permits ongoing treatment for specific cases.

    Conclusion

    • The court’s verdict allows continued stem cell therapy for ASD, acknowledging the ongoing uncertainty and potential of the treatment.
    • The decision underlines the need for further research and data to establish stem cell therapy’s efficacy and safety for treating autism.

  • Has the RTI been weakened over the years?

    Central Idea

    • Activists worry about the diminishing effectiveness Right to Information Act, 2005 in holding officials accountable.
    • The Act has exemptions for political parties, the judiciary, and intelligence agencies.
    • Recent amendments have sparked concerns, such as personal data protection provisions.

    The DPDP Act and RTI

    • The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, of 2023 prohibits personal data disclosure, even for social audits, reducing transparency.
    • Critics fear this blanket ban may hinder accountability and transparency efforts.

    About the Right to Information (RTI)

    Enactment June 15, 2005
    Objective Promote transparency and accountability
    Applicability All public authorities at central, state, local levels
    Scope Access to information on matters of public interest, government policies, budgets, etc.
    RTI Application Filed in writing with the concerned public authority
    Response Time Within 30 days (48 hours for life or liberty issues)
    Exemptions Some information exempted to protect national security, privacy, etc.

    Judiciary
    Fees Nominal fee varies based on state and information requested
    First Appellate Authority Filed if dissatisfied with the response
    Second Appeal Filed with the relevant Information Commission
    Whistleblower Protection Safeguards against victimization for exposing corruption
    Impact Promotes transparency, accountability, and good governance

    Challenges in Implementation

    • Implementation issues undermine the transparency that the Act aims to achieve.
    • The Act’s effectiveness depends on subordinate rules set by the Union and State Governments.
    • Slow appointments to information commissions delay appeals and erode trust in the system.

    Barriers and Online Solutions

    • Payment methods for RTI applications vary among States, causing complications.
    • Online RTI portals remove barriers but are not widespread, hindering access.
    • The Union Government’s RTI portal has usability issues, impacting data retrieval.

    Growing Dissatisfaction

    • Rising first appeals indicate growing dissatisfaction with the information provided.
    • Structural problems in institutions and websites hinder RTI effectiveness.
    • Activists emphasize the importance of addressing broader institutional issues.

    Conclusion

    • The RTI Act’s efficacy is hampered by implementation challenges, amendments, and online barriers.
    • A holistic approach is needed to restore and enhance the Act’s effectiveness.
    • Addressing these issues will strengthen transparency, accountability, and citizens’ access to information.

  • What is the debate around ‘one nation, one election’?

    What’s the news?

    • The government forms a committee to explore the possibility of One Nation, One Election.

    Central idea

    • On September 1st, the Central government established a committee chaired by former President Ram Nath Kovind to assess the viability of the ‘one nation, one election’ (ONOE) proposal. This concept revolves around synchronizing the timing of Lok Sabha and State Assembly elections across all states to reduce the frequency of electoral processes across the country.

    What is the ONOE plan?

    • Concept: The ONOE plan aims to synchronize the timing of the Lok Sabha and State Assembly elections across all states in India to reduce the frequency of election cycles nationwide.
    • Historical Context:
      • After the enforcement of the Constitution on January 26, 1950, the first-ever general elections for both the Lok Sabha and State Assemblies occurred simultaneously in 1951-1952.
      • This practice continued for the following three Lok Sabha elections until 1967, streamlining the election process.
    • Disruption:
      • In 1959, the cycle was disrupted as the Central government invoked Article 356 of the Constitution, leading to the dismissal of the Kerala government, due to a perceived failure of constitutional machinery.
      • Subsequent to 1960, defections and counter-defections among political parties led to the dissolution of several State Legislative Assemblies.
      • This fragmentation resulted in separate election cycles for the Lok Sabha and State Assemblies.
    • Current Scenario: Presently, only specific States such as Arunachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Andhra Pradesh, and Odisha conduct their assembly polls concurrently with the Lok Sabha elections.

    Reports and Perspectives on ONOE

    • Law Commission of India (LCI) Report – 2018:
    • The LCI, led by Justice B. S. Chauhan, issued a draft report in August 2018 that scrutinized simultaneous elections.
    • The report acknowledged the constitutional and legal complexities surrounding this proposal.
    • It emphasized that the current constitutional framework necessitates amendments for the plan to be realized.
    • The LCI also recommended seeking approval from at least 50% of the States for such an overhaul.
    • Despite feasibility challenges, the report recognized potential benefits, including cost savings, reduced administrative burden, timely policy execution, and focused governance.
    • Historical Context – LCI Report 1999:
    • Notably, the LCI, headed by Justice B. P. Jeevan Reddy, supported the concept of simultaneous elections as early as 1999.
    • This historical context underscores that the idea has been debated over time.
    • Balancing Perspectives:
    • The reports and perspectives reveal a dualistic landscape: ONOE offers advantages like efficient governance and reduced election strain, but it’s hampered by practical and constitutional complexities.
    • In assessing ONOE’s viability, the focus is on a well-rounded understanding that considers both the potential benefits and the intricate challenges.

    Concerns Regarding the One Nation, One Election Plan

    • Feasibility and Constitutional Implications:
      • The Constitution outlines fixed tenures (Article 83(2) and 172) for the Lok Sabha and State Assemblies, raising doubts about the feasibility of simultaneous elections.
      • The possibility of mid-term government collapse necessitates a clear mechanism for holding fresh elections or imposing the President’s rule.
    • Federalism and Conceptual Incompatibility:
      • ONOE seems to conflict with the federal structure, contradicting the idea of India as a Union of States (Article 1).
      • Altering this balance might affect the autonomy and authority of state governments.
    • Frequency, Accountability, and Blending of Issues:
      • Frequent elections allow citizens to address national and state issues separately, enhancing accountability.
      • ONOE’s merging of issues might dilute accountability mechanisms and lead to a less-focused governance approach.
    • Cost Misconceptions:
      • While the Central government highlights the substantial costs of frequent elections, critics argue that the actual expenses are not as massive.
      • The analysis questions whether the Election Commission’s expenditure of ₹8,000 crore over five years, amounting to ₹1,500 crore annually or ₹27 per voter per year, is a significant expense for maintaining India’s democratic pride.

    Way forward

    • Comprehensive Constitutional Review:
      • Engage legal experts to meticulously assess necessary constitutional amendments for ONOE.
      • Develop a contingency plan to handle midterm government collapses, ensuring stability and smooth transitions.
    • Balancing Federalism and Centralization:
      • Initiate dialogues with state governments to understand and address their concerns about centralization.
      • Craft a balanced framework that respects both federal principles and national electoral efficiency.
    • Hybrid Accountability Model:
      • Explore a hybrid approach that retains staggered elections for select states while implementing ONOE for others.
      • Maintain distinct accountability mechanisms for national and state issues, promoting effective governance.
    • Transparent Cost-Benefit Analysis:
      • Conduct an independent and transparent assessment of the costs and savings associated with ONOE.
      • Present factual data to address misconceptions and inform stakeholders about the financial implications.
    • Pilots and Gradual Implementation:
      • Begin ONOE implementation through pilot projects in a limited number of states.
      • Assess challenges, gather insights, and refine the approach before nationwide adoption.

    Conclusion

    • The proposal for one nation, one election envisions synchronizing Lok Sabha and State Assembly elections to curtail the frequency of polls. The Indian democracy’s complex dynamics and diverse contexts warrant a comprehensive assessment before implementing such a transformative change.