💥Join UPSC 2027,2028 Mentorship (August Batch) + XFactor Notes & Microthemes PDF
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

GS Paper: GS2

  • Jan Vishwas Bill

    Central Idea

    • The Jan Vishwas Bill, aimed at enhancing ease of doing business, has sparked a heated debate over certain amendments that modify the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.
    • While the bill intends to streamline regulatory provisions, critics argue that it may allow manufacturers of substandard medicines to evade imprisonment and instead pay fines for their offenses.

    Jan Vishwas Bill

    • Amendment I: The first amendment under the Jan Vishwas Bill eliminates imprisonment for companies repeatedly using government analysis or test reports to promote their products. Instead, offenders will be subject to a fine not less than five lakh rupees, as opposed to the previous fine of not less than ten thousand rupees.
    • Amendment II: The second, more contentious amendment allows for the “compounding” of offenses under section 27 (d) of the existing Drugs and Cosmetics Act. Compounding enables companies to pay a fine as an alternative to undergoing criminal proceedings. However, section 27 (d) covers offenses related to drugs not of standard quality (NSQ) or colloquially termed substandard drugs.

    Controversy and Concerns

    • NSQ Drugs and Their Risks: Substandard drugs (NSQ) are products that fail to meet Indian Pharmacopoeia requirements, leading to potential harm to consumers. Examples include drugs with low levels of active ingredients, affecting treatment effectiveness and causing antibiotic resistance.
    • Criticism of Inclusion of Section 27 (d): The inclusion of NSQ drugs under section 27 (d) for compounding has raised concerns among many. Critics argue that it could allow companies to escape liability for manufacturing substandard products by merely paying a fine.

    Scope of Offenses Eligible for Compounding

    • Eligible Offenses: Compounding will be available for manufacturers whose drugs are NSQ, enabling them to avoid criminal proceedings by paying a fine.
    • Government’s Stance: The government contends that compounding will be reserved for minor aberrations or quality control issues, and companies involved in spurious or adulterated drug manufacturing will not be eligible. It aims to offer an alternate mechanism for minor offenses to reduce litigation delays and foster ease of doing business.

    Impact on Good Manufacturing Practices

    • Schedule M Requirements: In 2018, amendments were made to Schedule M of the drug act to improve drug manufacturing practices. However, a significant number of drug manufacturers have yet to adopt these measures.
    • Compounding for Non-Compliance: Under the Jan Vishwas Bill, companies failing to implement Schedule M requirements within the stipulated time will be prosecuted under section 27 (d).

    Industry Perspective

    • Industry Support for Compounding: Some manufacturers view compounding as a positive step, preventing minor offenses from leading to lengthy litigation and business disruptions. They argue that non-intentional aberrations should not result in imprisonment, especially for first-time offenders.
    • Balancing Enforcement and Business Growth: Advocates of compounding emphasize that strict action should be taken against repeat offenders or those engaging in offenses with malicious intent. Balancing enforcement and encouraging quality production will enable the pharmaceutical industry to thrive and produce safe, effective products.

    Conclusion

    • Striking a balance between enabling business growth and enforcing quality standards will be critical in determining the long-term impact of the bill on the pharmaceutical industry.

    Also read:

    In news: Jan Vishwas Bill, 2022

  • Money Bills vs Finance Bills: What are the differences, what the court has ruled

    What’s the news?

    • The recent discussions over the Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Bill have brought to light an important constitutional question – Is it a Money Bill or an Ordinary Bill? The distinction between these two types of bills holds significant implications for the legislative process and decision-making.

    Central Idea

    • In a recent statement, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Pralhad Joshi clarified that the DPDP Bill is a regular Bill and not a Money Bill. This clarification comes against the backdrop of earlier reports suggesting that the Bill was being introduced under Article 117 of the Constitution, which deals with special provisions for Finance Bills.

    What is a Finance Bill?

    1. Definition: A Finance Bill is a type of Financial Bill that relates to revenue or expenditure matters.
    2. Money Bill Criteria: A Finance Bill becomes a Money Bill when it exclusively deals with matters specified in Article 110(1)(a) to (g) of the Constitution.
    • Classification of Finance Bills
    1. Category 1: Financial Bills related to Article 110(1)(a) to (f):
      • Introduced or moved only on the President’s recommendation.
      • Cannot be introduced in the Rajya Sabha.
      • Examples: Money Bills and other Financial Bills originating solely in the Lok Sabha.
    2. Category 2: Financial Bills related to other matters (Article 110(1)(g)):
      • Similar to ordinary Bills.
      • Require the President’s recommendation if they involve expenditure from the Consolidated Fund of India.
      • It can be introduced in the Rajya Sabha, amended by it, or deliberated by both Houses in a joint sitting.

    Money Bill Requirements

    • Exclusivity: A Money Bill must exclusively deal with matters specified in Article 110(1)(a) to (g).
    • Certification: A Money Bill must be certified by the Speaker.

    Preconditions for a Financial Bill to become a money bill

    • Introduction: Must be introduced only in the Lok Sabha and not in the Rajya Sabha, as per Article 117(1) of the Constitution.
    • President’s Recommendation: Can only be introduced on the President’s recommendation, as per Article 117(1) of the Constitution.

    Key Differences between Finance Bills and Money Bills

    • Scope: Finance Bills cover general revenue and expenditure matters, while Money Bills exclusively address specific matters listed in Article 110(1)(a) to (g).
    • Introduction: Finance Bills can be introduced in either House, but Money Bills can only be introduced in the Lok Sabha.
    • President’s Recommendation: Finance Bills require the President’s recommendation if they involve expenditure, while Money Bills always require the President’s recommendation.
    • Rajya Sabha’s Role: The Rajya Sabha can discuss and recommend amendments for Finance Bills, but its role is limited for Money Bills. The Lok Sabha can reject the Rajya Sabha’s recommendations for Money Bills.

    Important Legal Perspective

    • 2017 Finance Act:
    • In November 2019, a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court, headed by the then Chief Justice of India, Ranjan Gogoi, struck down amendments to the 2017 Finance Act passed as a Money Bill.
    • The court directed the formulation of fresh norms for appointing tribunal members and raised questions about the correct interpretation of Article 110. The matter was referred to a seven-judge bench.
    • 2016 Aadhaar Act:
    • The Supreme Court also expressed doubts over its 2018 verdict upholding the 2016 Aadhaar Act, which was passed as a Money Bill.
    • Review petitions regarding the Aadhaar Act are still pending before the court.

    Conclusion

    • The distinction between Money Bills and Financial Bills is essential for understanding the legislative process and the powers of the two Houses of Parliament. The role of the Supreme Court in interpreting and upholding the constitutional validity of various Bills remains critical to ensuring a robust and accountable legislative framework.

  • Homeopathy and associated issues

    What’s the news?

    • In a recent development, the ICMR and the Ministry of Ayush have agreed to enhance cooperation in health research related to integrated medicine.

    Central idea

    • The recent push to integrate AYUSH medicinal systems into mainstream health care to achieve universal health coverage and decolonize medicine is a commendable pluralistic approach. However, this endeavor must prioritize safety and efficacy standards for every participating system. Unfortunately, Homeopathy falls short of meeting these essential criteria.

    What is an integrated system of medicine?

    • An integrated system of medicine refers to an approach that combines elements from different healthcare systems or modalities, such as conventional medicine and traditional, complementary, or alternative medicine, with the goal of providing comprehensive and patient-centered care.

    What Is Homeopathy?

    • Homeopathy is a system of alternative medicine founded in the late 18th century by Samuel Heinemann, a German physician.
    • Homeopathy is a medical system based on the belief that the body can cure itself. Those who practice it use tiny amounts of natural substances like plants and minerals. They believe these stimulate the healing process.
    • This is based on the idea that a substance that causes symptoms in a healthy individual can stimulate the body’s natural healing response to overcome similar symptoms in an ill person.

    Key principles of Homeopathy

    • The Law of Similar: Homeopathy follows the principle that a substance that produces symptoms in a healthy person can be used to treat similar symptoms in a sick person.
    • Minimum Dose: Homeopathic remedies are prepared through a process of dilution and potentization, which involves repeatedly diluting the original substance and shaking it vigorously. The belief is that this process enhances the remedy’s healing properties while minimizing any potential toxicity.
    • Individualization: Homeopathy treats each person as a unique individual and tailors the treatment to address their specific symptoms and overall constitution.
    • Totality of Symptoms: Rather than focusing solely on a specific disease or isolated symptoms, homeopathy takes into account the totality of a person’s physical, mental, and emotional symptoms to find an appropriate remedy.

    Concerns over the efficacy and safety of Homeopathy

    • Weak Evidence: The evidence supporting the efficacy of homeopathy is considered weak. The Nuremberg Salt Test (1835), a well-conducted double-blind randomized controlled trial, discredited homeopathy, attributing its claimed effects to imagination, self-deception, or potential fraud.
    • Inconsistent Systematic Reviews: Multiple systematic reviews and meta-analyses have consistently shown that homeopathic treatments lack clinically significant effects across various ailments, population groups, study types, and treatment regimes.
    • Unregistered Trials: Researchers found that more than half of the 193 homeopathic trials conducted in the last two decades were not registered. Surprisingly, unregistered trials showed some evidence of efficacy, while registered trials did not, casting doubt on the validity and reliability of the evidence.
    • Lack of confidence: The World Health Organization (WHO) has issued warnings against using homeopathy for serious conditions such as HIV, tuberculosis, malaria, and infant flu and diarrhea. This indicates a lack of confidence in its effectiveness in treating such illnesses.
    • Ineffectiveness for Serious Conditions: Evidence suggests that homeopathy may not work effectively in treating cancers and may not help reduce the adverse effects of cancer treatments.
    • Potential Delay in Effective Treatment: One of the safety concerns related to homeopathy is its potential to delay the application of evidence-based clinical care for serious or life-threatening conditions. This delay can have detrimental effects on patients’ health outcomes.

    Arguments in favor of Homeopathy

    • Historical Usage: Supporters of homeopathy often highlight its long historical usage and widespread popularity, arguing that its effectiveness is demonstrated by its continued use over the centuries.
    • Individualization of Treatment: Homeopathy emphasizes individualized treatment, tailoring remedies to address a person’s unique symptoms and overall constitution. This personalized approach is believed to be beneficial for patients who may not respond well to standardized treatments.
    • Minimal Side Effects: Homeopathic remedies are highly diluted, which proponents claim minimizes side effects and makes them safe for use, even in sensitive patient populations.
    • Holistic Approach: Advocates assert that homeopathy takes a holistic view of health, considering not only physical symptoms but also mental and emotional aspects of a person’s well-being.
    • Anecdotal Testimonials: Supporters of homeopathy often provide anecdotal testimonials from patients who claim to have experienced positive outcomes from using homeopathic remedies. Supporters of homeopathy often cite testimonials from famous figures like Gandhi and Tagore to bolster its credibility.

    Way forward: Key areas that India needs to focus on regarding Homeopathy

    • Evidence-Based Medicine: India needs to prioritize evidence-based medicine across all healthcare systems, including homeopathy. Rigorous research, clinical trials, and systematic reviews should be conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of homoeopathic treatments.
    • Integration and Pluralism: India should adopt a balanced approach to healthcare by integrating various medicinal systems, including allopatry and AYUSH, while ensuring that only evidence-based and effective practices are incorporated into mainstream healthcare.
    • Regulatory Oversight: Strengthen regulatory bodies to oversee the practice of homeopathy and ensure adherence to quality standards and ethical guidelines. This will help maintain patient safety and foster trust in the healthcare system.
    • Education and Awareness: Promote education and awareness among healthcare professionals and the public about the strengths and limitations of homeopathy. Informed decision-making and patient choice should be encouraged based on scientific evidence.
    • Holistic Health Approach: Emphasize a holistic approach to healthcare that considers not only physical symptoms but also mental, emotional, and social aspects of health. This approach should be integrated into all medical systems, including homeopathy.
    • Continuous Improvement: Continuously review and update the integration of homeopathy and other medical systems based on emerging evidence and changing healthcare needs. This iterative approach will lead to a more responsive and effective healthcare system.

    Conclusion

    • For India’s path towards universal health care, an evidence-based and ethics-driven medicine approach should be embraced, ensuring that only safe and effective treatments are integrated into mainstream healthcare practices.

    Also read:

    World Ayurveda Congress: Aligning traditional medicine with modern medicines

  • Post-1957, President retains power to scrap Article 370: Supreme Court

    Central Idea

    • The Supreme Court deliberated on the President’s power to declare Article 370 of the Constitution, which granted special status to J&K, inoperative after the dissolution of the State’s Constituent Assembly in 1957.
    • The court questioned whether the Constituent Assembly’s dissolution nullifies the substantive part of Clause 3 in Article 370.
    • Senior counsel argued that Article 370 cannot be revoked after the Constituent Assembly’s dissolution, but the court questioned the extent of the President’s powers.

    Also read:

    [Burning Issue] Reorganization of Jammu and Kashmir

    Historical Context of Article 370

    • The Constituent Assembly of J&K was a temporary body convened for drafting the State’s Constitution, becoming functus officio after its completion.
    • Article 370 was considered “temporary” because it allowed the people of J&K to determine their Constitution and the jurisdiction of Union of India.
    • The collaborative relationship between the Union and J&K, with constant dialogue and parliamentary laws applying to J&K through Constitution Orders, was disrupted by the abrogation of special constitutional status in 2019.

    Contentions raised against A370 Revocation

    • Constituent Assembly’s Role: The provision requiring the J&K Constituent Assembly’s recommendation for abrogation has no application, given its specific purpose was to draft the State’s Constitution.
    • Impact on Democracy: The argument raised concerns about silencing the people’s will in J&K, where representative democracy had been absent for five years. The State’s unique relationship with India was emphasized.
    • Parliament’s Authority: The counsel questioned Parliament’s authority to declare itself the legislature of J&K and abrogate Article 370, asserting that Parliament could not act outside the Constitution.
    • Temporary Provision: It was clarified that Article 370 was mentioned as a “temporary” provision because it allowed the people of J&K to determine their future through their Constituent Assembly.

    Conclusion

    • The Supreme Court’s examination of the President’s power over Article 370 after the Constituent Assembly’s dissolution raises significant questions about the unique constitutional structure and the collaboration between the Union and J&K.
    • The verdict will determine whether Article 370 remains operative and its implications on the historical relationship between the State and the Union.

  • Saudi Arabia to mediate Russia-Ukraine Conflict

    russia

    Central Idea

    • Saudi Arabia is taking a significant step towards mediating the Russia-Ukraine conflict by hosting peace talks on August 5 and 6 in Jeddah.
    • The talks come amidst ongoing hostilities between Russia and Ukraine, with both sides unwilling to compromise on their respective visions for peace.

    Upcoming Peace Talks in Jeddah

    • Participants: The UK, EU, India, South Africa, Poland, and the US National Security Advisor have confirmed their attendance. Russia, having rejected Ukraine’s peace plan, has not been invited.
    • Goal: Ukraine aims to garner support for its 10-point peace plan and promote the restoration of lasting and just peace. The talks are seen as a constructive way to involve non-aligned countries and promote third-party mediation beyond the West.

    Current status of the war

    • Military Standoff: Ukraine is determined to fight back, supported by military aid from Europe and the US.
    • Unlikely Peace Talks: The United Nations Secretary-General expressed doubts about the possibility of peace negotiations at this stage, given both sides’ conviction of their ability to win on the battlefield.
    • Divergent Views: While both Russia and Ukraine express openness to talks, they vehemently disagree on the terms of peace. Ukraine insists on the withdrawal of Russian troops and the restoration of its territorial integrity, while Russia seeks recognition of redrawn borders, including annexed territories.

    Previous (Failed) Negotiations

    • Early Talks: In the initial stages of the conflict, talks for temporary ceasefires and humanitarian corridors took place.
    • War atrocities: However, direct peace negotiations have not occurred since May last year due to mounting evidence of war atrocities and attacks on civilians.

    China’s Peace Plan and African Efforts

    • China’s 12-Point Plan: Released in February, China’s plan called for the ceasing of hostilities, support for territorial integrity, and the abandonment of a cold war mentality. It was seen as skewed in favor of Russia and a diplomatic attempt by China to engage in the peace process.
    • African Proposal: Seven African countries led by South Africa proposed a 10-point plan for recognizing sovereignty, prisoner release, foodgrain exports, de-escalation, and prompt peace negotiations. The plan aimed to address the conflict’s impact on African nations’ food security.

    Status of the War

    • Kerch Bridge Incident: A terrorist attack on the Kerch Bridge led to Russia terminating the Black Sea Grain Initiative, further impacting grain shipments from Ukraine.
    • Ukraine’s Counter-Offensive: Ukraine continues its counter-offensive efforts, achieving advances in some regions but facing challenges in others.
    • US-Supplied Cluster Bombs: Ukraine’s use of US-supplied cluster bombs has been confirmed, effective against Russian defensive positions.
    • NATO Entry Denied: Ukraine’s last-ditch effort to secure an invitation for NATO membership was not successful.
    • Ukraine attacks Moscow: At least 3 different Ukrainian-made drones have been used in attacks inside Russia, including Moscow.

    Nature of the Conflict

    • Territorial Disputes: The conflict centers around territorial disputes and geopolitical interests, leading to extensive missile attacks and drone strikes.
    • Cold War Wounds: Historical contestations and ideological clashes contribute to the Ukraine crisis.
    • NATO Expansion: Ukraine’s bid for NATO membership and Russian interests in the Black Sea are key factors in the conflict.

    India’s Position in the Conflict

    • Exercising strategic autonomy: India practices strategic autonomy, maintaining a nuanced neutrality between the US-led West and Russia.
    • Favor for Russia: India abstains from supporting the US-led Western coalition, focusing on economic relationships with both parties.
    • Symbolic Criticisms: India emphasizes the importance of respecting territorial integrity while calling for an immediate end to violence and diplomatic solutions.
    • Condemnation: PM Modi openly appealed to Mr. Putin for peace, highlighting the pursuit of diplomatic solutions.

    Challenges to Ending the War

    • Proxy War: External players, including the US and NATO, complicate the conflict with their strategic interests.
    • Sovereignty Disputes: Unresolved territorial disputes fuel ongoing hostilities.
    • Ideological Divide: Clashes between Ukraine’s European aspirations and Russia’s sphere of influence add to tensions.
    • Military Support: Foreign military assistance to both parties sustains the conflict.
    • Economic Interests: Energy resources and Europe’s dependence on Russian gas play a role.
    • Lack of Trust: A deep lack of trust hinders lasting agreements.

    Conclusion

    • The Russia-Ukraine conflict remains a challenging and complex issue with no easy resolution in sight.
    • The upcoming peace talks in Jeddah represent a step towards international mediation, involving influential players from various regions.

  • WHO Report on Tobacco Control

    Central Idea

    • The WHO has released a report on the progress made in global tobacco control in the last 15 years.
    • The report highlights the impact of the MPOWER measures, introduced by WHO, to combat tobacco use and protect public health.

    What are MPOWER measures by WHO?

    • The World Health Organization (WHO) has introduced a set of global health targets known as “MPOWER measures” to address the global tobacco epidemic.
    • These measures are evidence-based strategies aimed at reducing tobacco use and its associated health risks.
    • The MPOWER measures were developed to assist countries in implementing effective tobacco control policies and interventions.
    • The term “MPOWER” is an acronym, with each letter representing a specific area of focus:
    1. M – Monitor tobacco use and prevention policies
    2. P – Protect people from tobacco smoke
    3. O– Offer help to quit tobacco use
    4. W – Warn about the dangers of tobacco
    5. E – Enforce bans on tobacco advertising, promotion, and sponsorship
    6. R – Raise taxes on tobacco products

    Key Findings of the Report

    • Reduction in Smoking: Globally, there are 300 million fewer smokers today, with smoking prevalence declining from 22.8% in 2007 to 17% in 2021. In a city-specific example, hundreds of enforcement drives and awareness campaigns resulted in a 27% reduction in smoking in public places.
    • Impact of MPOWER Measures: The MPOWER measures have positively impacted tobacco control efforts worldwide. 71% of the global population, or 5.6 billion people, are protected by at least one MPOWER measure, up from 5% in 2008. The number of countries implementing at least one measure has increased from 44 to 151.
    • Global Challenges: Despite progress, 44 countries still do not implement any MPOWER measure, and there are shortcomings in enforcing smoke-free policies in healthcare facilities and restaurants.
    • Focus on Second-Hand Smoke: The report emphasizes the importance of curbing second-hand smoke, which causes significant health risks, including 1.3 million tobacco-related deaths among non-smokers annually. India is among the countries making efforts to control this aspect.

    India’s Achievements and Areas for Improvement

    • Health Warning Labels: India ranks among the top 10 countries for having health warning labels on cigarette packs, with 85% of packs carrying warnings on both sides.
    • Ban on E-cigarettes: India has implemented a ban on the sale of e-cigarettes, which WHO recognizes as an essential step in curbing the tobacco epidemic.
    • Smoking Bans: India has banned smoking in healthcare facilities and educational institutions, although there is scope for improvement in terms of enforcement.
    • Warnings on OTT Platforms: India is taking significant steps to implement warnings on over-the-top (OTT) platform content showing tobacco use, making it the first country to do so. This move is crucial, given the increased subscriptions to OTT platforms during the pandemic.

    Expert Perspectives

    • Experts suggest the need for further amendments to India’s comprehensive tobacco control laws, with specific attention to banning the loose sale of cigarettes.
    • Implementing warnings on OTT platforms is seen as a necessary measure to reach a broader audience, especially young viewers.

    Conclusion

    • The WHO report highlights the global progress in reducing smoking prevalence and implementing tobacco control measures.
    • While India has made significant strides in certain aspects of tobacco control, there are areas that require continued attention and action.

  • Data Protection Bill 2023: What the law must do for children online

    online

    What’s the news?

    • As a reworked version of the Digital Personal Data Protection Bill, 2022 (DPDP Bill) reaches Parliament, it is prudent to talk about one demographic that often receives less attention in the conversation on data privacy — children

    Central idea

    • With children constituting over 15 per cent of active internet users in the country and their online activities evolving rapidly, protecting their safety and privacy online has become a critical concern.

    Vulnerability of children online

    • Limited Understanding: Children often have limited understanding of the potential risks and consequences associated with sharing personal information online. They may not fully grasp the permanence and public nature of their digital footprint.
    • Trust and Naivety: Due to their trusting nature, children can be easily deceived by online predators or malicious individuals who take advantage of their naivety.
    • Lack of Experience: Many children lack the experience to recognize scams, phishing attempts, or deceptive content, making them more susceptible to online fraud and misinformation.
    • Cyberbullying and Harassment: Children can become victims of cyberbullying, harassment, or online abuse, which can have severe psychological and emotional effects on their well-being.
    • Inappropriate Content Exposure: Without proper supervision, children may stumble upon inappropriate or harmful content online, impacting their mental health and development.
    • Social Media Pressure: Children may face pressure to conform to certain social media standards, leading to self-esteem issues and the desire to share personal information or engage in risky behaviors to fit in.
    • Data Privacy Concerns: Children may unknowingly share sensitive data, such as location information, contact details, or pictures, making them potential targets for privacy breaches or data misuse.
    • Lack of Parental Guidance: In some cases, parents may be less tech-savvy or unaware of their children’s online activities, leaving them exposed to online risks without proper guidance

    How DPDP Bill ensures online safety for children?

    • Definition of Minors: The DPDP Bill defines individuals under the age of 18 as minors. This definition acknowledges that children are particularly vulnerable and deserve additional safeguards for their personal data.
    • Data Processing Obligations: The bill places three specific conditions on data processing entities when handling children’s data:
    1. Obtaining verifiable parental consent: As mentioned above, entities must ensure they have proper consent from a parent or guardian before processing a child’s data.
    2. Not causing harm to children: Data processing activities should not harm or exploit children in any way.
    3. Not tracking or targeting ads at children: Entities are prohibited from tracking children’s online behavior for targeted advertising purposes.
    • Exemptions: The bill allows the government to exempt certain entities from the requirement of parental consent and tracking and targeting ads for specific purposes. However, such exemptions must be for the best interests of a child.

    Why a graded approach is necessary?

    • Age Diversity and Developmental Stages: Children’s maturity levels vary across different age groups. A rigid age requirement may not consider the developmental stages of children, leading to over- or under-protection of their data.
    • Balancing Access and Protection: A graded approach allows for a balance between age-appropriate access to digital services and data protection. It enables children to access educational platforms while imposing stricter age-gating for services with higher privacy risks.
    • Promoting Digital Literacy: Gradually exposing children to digital platforms with age-appropriate content fosters digital literacy and responsible online behavior from an early age.
    • Preventing Misrepresentation: A strict age-gating requirement might encourage children to misrepresent their age to access certain services, defeating the purpose of data protection measures.
    • Adapting to Technological Advancements: The digital landscape is dynamic, with new services constantly emerging. A graded approach allows for flexibility in adjusting age requirements as technology evolves.

    Way forward

    • Graded Approach Implementation: Adopt a graded and risk-based approach to age-gating for accessing different digital services. This approach allows the government to set varied age thresholds based on privacy risks, ensuring age-appropriate access while protecting children’s data.
    • Clear Guidelines for Age Verification and Consent: Provide clear and reliable mechanisms for age verification and obtaining parental consent. Ensure that these mechanisms adhere to data protection principles like data minimization and purpose limitation to prevent unintended data collection.
    • Defining Verifiably Safe Manner: Articulate core principles of what qualifies as a verifiably safe manner for processing children’s data to avoid ambiguity. This will guide data processing entities in ensuring children’s safety and privacy.
    • Promoting Digital Literacy: Develop and implement digital literacy programs that educate children about online risks and responsible behavior. These initiatives should be integrated into school curricula, and awareness campaigns for parents and guardians should be conducted.
    • Parental Guidance and Involvement: Encourage active parental involvement in their children’s online activities. Provide resources and workshops to help parents understand the digital world and support their children in using digital services safely.
    • Collaboration with Tech Companies: Engage with technology companies to develop age-appropriate interfaces, privacy settings, and content filters. Prioritize child safety in the design and features of digital platforms.
    • Robust Reporting Mechanisms: Establish accessible and user-friendly reporting mechanisms for inappropriate content, cyberbullying, or any other online harm targeting children. Promptly address reported issues and take appropriate actions.

    Conclusion

    • As India deliberates on various laws and policies to regulate the internet, it is crucial to prioritize the needs and interests of children. Protecting children’s data privacy will not only secure their online experiences but also foster responsible digital citizenship from an early age

    Also read:

    [Sureshot]Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Bill, 2022

  • IIM bill 2023

    What’s the news?

    • A new amendment bill introduced by the Centre in the Lok Sabha has sparked a debate on the autonomy of the Indian Institutes of Management (IIMs). The bill proposes to make the President of India the Visitor to IIMs with powers to audit their functioning, order probes, and appoint as well as remove directors.

    Central idea

    • In 2017, the Parliament passed the IIM Act, significantly expanding the autonomy of IIMs and giving them greater control over their affairs. One crucial provision mandated an independent review of the institutes every three years, with the report to be made public. However, after six years, only a few IIMs have complied with this requirement, leading the government to table the IIM (Amendment) Bill in 2023.

    The proposed provisions in the Bill

    • Creation of the Post of Visitor: The Bill proposes the creation of the post of Visitor, who will be the President of India. The Visitor will play a crucial role in overseeing the functioning of the IIMs and ensuring proper governance.
    • Appointment Powers: The Visitor will have the authority to appoint the chairperson of the Board of Governors (BoG) of the IIMs. This move grants the President of India a significant say in the leadership of the institutes.
    • Involvement in Director Appointments: The Bill empowers the Visitor to have a say in the appointment process for directors of IIMs. The Visitor will have representation on the selection committee for the appointment of directors, allowing them to influence the choice of institute heads.
    • Review and Inquiry Initiation: The Visitor will have the power to initiate reviews or inquiries into the affairs of any IIM. This provision allows for greater oversight and scrutiny of the institutes’ functioning.
    • Director Removal: The Visitor will be granted the authority to remove a director of an IIM if deemed necessary. This move gives the President the power to take action against directors who may not be performing their duties effectively or who are involved in any misconduct.

    Issues with the Current Governance

    • Lack of Accountability: The current governance structure in IIMs lacks adequate accountability due to the significant autonomy granted by the 2017 IIM Act. This has led to a governance vacuum with limited checks and balances on directors’ actions, potentially resulting in mismanagement.
    • Absence of Norms on Key Matters: The IIM Act’s failure to establish clear norms on crucial matters, such as the appointment of key positions, has led to a lack of transparency and objectivity in decision-making.
    • Turmoil and Protests: Some IIMs have experienced internal turmoil and protests against administrative decisions, indicating a disconnect between management and stakeholders.
    • For instance, at IIM Ahmedabad, faculty and alumni protested against changes to the institute’s logo and the decision to demolish architecturally significant structures on the campus.
    • Rising MBA Course Fees: An additional concern with the current governance is the relentless rise in the fee for MBA courses, which is not necessarily related to the actual costs of the course.
    • Unresponsive to Queries and Suggestions: There have been reports that some IIMs have been unresponsive to queries and suggestions from various stakeholders, including the government.
    • Uneven Governance Practices: The level of governance and accountability might vary across different IIMs. Some of the lower-ranked IIMs have been accused of operating as petty tyrannies, with directors holding unchecked power.

    Importance of Government Control

    • Ensuring Accountability: Government control is crucial to ensuring accountability in the functioning of educational institutions, including the Indian Institutes of Management (IIMs). It helps prevent misuse of power, financial irregularities, and a lack of transparency.
    • Preserving the Public Interest: As public institutions, IIMs have a responsibility to serve the public interest. Government control ensures that the institutes remain focused on their core mission of providing quality education and contributing to socio-economic development.
    • Academic Integrity: Government oversight safeguards academic integrity by promoting fairness in faculty appointments, curriculum design, and research activities.
    • Addressing Societal Needs: Government involvement allows IIMs to align their objectives with societal demands, producing graduates with relevant skills to address the country’s evolving challenges.
    • Equitable Access and Affordability: Government control promotes inclusivity by implementing policies that ensure equal access to quality education, irrespective of socio-economic backgrounds.
    • Quality Assurance: Government oversight allows the establishment of quality assurance mechanisms, ensuring that the IIMs maintain their reputation as world-class institutions adhering to global standards.

    Concerns Regarding the IIM Amendment Bill 2023

    • Potential Government Control: Critics and some directors of IIMs are concerned about increased government control over the institutions through the designation of the President of India as the Visitor with powers to appoint and remove directors.
    • Autonomy Erosion: The bill has raised fears that it may undermine the autonomy granted to IIMs in 2017, potentially leading to a dilution of their independence and decision-making authority.
    • Lack of Stakeholder Involvement: Stakeholders, including directors of IIMs, are apprehensive about insufficient consultation during the bill’s drafting, which they believe could impact the institutes’ governance.
    • Apprehensions About the Independent Board Model: Critics argue that the existing independent board model governing B-schools has been successful globally and could continue to be effective in India without introducing a Visitor.
    • Potential for Ideological Influence: The critiques allege that the bill may be used to enforce ideological conformity, raising concerns about the Visitor’s influence over the institutes’ academic pursuits.
    • Impact on Institutional Reputation: Uncertainty surrounding the bill could affect IIMs’ reputation, leading stakeholders to question their stability and governance.

    Way Forward

    • Inclusive Consultation: The government should engage in inclusive consultations with IIMs, education experts, policymakers, and stakeholders to address concerns and ensure broad consensus on the bill’s provisions.
    • Amendment Refinements: Based on feedback received during consultations, the government should consider refining the bill’s provisions to strike an appropriate balance between accountability and autonomy.
    • Codifying Norms: Clear norms and guidelines should be incorporated into the bill to provide a framework for responsible governance while allowing flexibility in decision-making.
    • Promote Transparency: The bill should emphasize transparency in decision-making processes and overall governance to build trust among stakeholders.
    • Continuous Evaluation: Implementing a system of continuous evaluation and feedback will help gauge the effectiveness of the bill’s provisions.
    • Focus on Quality Education: The primary focus should remain on maintaining and improving the quality of education in IIMs while fostering greater accountability.

    Conclusion

    • The Bill reflects the government’s efforts to restore accountability and democratic oversight in the IIM system. Striking the right balance between autonomy and accountability is vital to maintaining the IIMs’ esteemed position in the Indian education landscape.

  • What is Zero FIR?

    zero FIR

    Central Idea

    • Recent incidents of violence and crime in Manipur have brought the concept of the ‘Zero First Information Report (FIR)’ into the spotlight.
    • The Supreme Court has sought for all data regarding such FIRs in Manipur Gangrape Incidence.

    What is Zero FIR?

    • Provision and Purpose: Zero FIR allows any police station to register an FIR for a cognisable offence without assigning a regular FIR number initially.
    • No diary: Whereas FIRs have serial numbers assigned to them, zero FIRs are assigned the number ‘0’. Hence the name.
    • Swift Action: The relevant police station subsequently registers a fresh FIR and commences the investigation.
    • Focus on Victims: It is designed to expedite complaint lodging, particularly for serious crimes involving women and children, without the need to approach multiple police stations.
    • Preserving Evidence: Early registration helps prevent the loss or tampering of crucial evidence and witnesses.
    • Transferred Jurisdiction: The Zero FIR is later transferred to the relevant police station where the offence occurred or where the investigation should be conducted.

    How does it work?

    • After a police station registers a zero FIR, it has to transfer the complaint to a police station that has the jurisdiction to investigate the alleged offence.
    • Once a zero FIR is transferred, the police station with the appropriate jurisdiction assigns it a serial number, thereby converting it into a regular FIR.

    Legal Provisions for Zero FIR

    The provision of Zero FIR finds support in various judgments and recommendations.

    • Satvinder Kaur vs. State (1999): The Delhi High Court held that a woman has the right to lodge her complaint from any place other than where the incident occurred.
    • Justice Verma Committee (2012): The introduction of Zero FIR was based on the recommendation of the Justice Verma Committee, which was formed in response to the 2012 Nirbhaya gangrape case.
    • Lalita Kumari vs. Govt. of UP (2014): The Supreme Court ruled that registration of an FIR is mandatory when information discloses the commission of a cognizable offence.

    Back2Basics: First Information Report (FIR)

    • Essential Document: An FIR is a written document prepared by the police upon receiving information about a cognisable offence.
    • What is a cognisable offences? It is when an officer can arrest a suspect without a court’s warrant if/she has “reason to believe” that the person committed the offence and arrest is necessary based on certain factors.
    • Triggering Investigation: It serves as the first step towards initiating the investigation process and subsequent police actions.
    • Registration for Cognizable Offences: Section 154(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) empowers the police to register an FIR for cognizable offences.
    • Punishment for Non-Registration: Section 166A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) provides punishment for public servants failing to record information related to a cognizable offence, with imprisonment of up to two years and a fine.

  • LPG consumption in Indian households saw an absolute reduction in 2023

    What’s the news?

    • For the first time, LPG consumption in Indian households saw an absolute reduction in 2023 (minus 0.5% versus FY22) after years of steady growth.

    Central idea

    • Over the past 15 years, the Government of India has endeavored to replicate the urban success of LPG adoption in rural and poorer households. The Grameen Vitrak Yojana and Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana (PMUY) have significantly expanded the rural distributor base from 18% to 60%. However, the recent decline in LPG consumption raised questions about its sustainability and highlighted the need for a transition.

    Significant growth in the LPG sector

    • Share Increase: The share of Indian households using LPG as their primary cooking fuel rose from 33% in 2011 to 71% in 2020, according to the India Residential Energy Consumption Survey (IRES) conducted by the Council on Energy, Environment, and Water (CEEW).
    • Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana (PMUY): The successful implementation of PMUY, launched in May 2016, played a pivotal role in promoting LPG adoption. Over 8 crore (80 million) free LPG connections were provided to women from Below Poverty Line (BPL) households by March 2021.
    • Reduction of Health and Environmental Hazards: The increased adoption of LPG has led to a reduction in health hazards caused by traditional cooking fuels like firewood, crop residues, and dung cakes. Indoor air pollution, particularly affecting women who spent long hours cooking in smoky kitchens, has decreased.
    • Government Initiatives: Government policies and initiatives aimed at promoting clean cooking solutions have contributed to the growing awareness among Indian households about the benefits of LPG as a clean fuel for cooking

    Challenges faced by the LPG sector

    • Financial Barriers: The withdrawal of LPG subsidies for all consumers during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 created financial barriers for many households, affecting their ability to afford LPG refills.
    • Underutilization of Subsidies: Despite providing three free cylinders to all PMUY consumers in FY21 as part of the Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana, only 14.1 crore out of the possible 24 crore free cylinders were consumed, indicating challenges in reaching the intended beneficiaries and ensuring full utilization of the provided benefits.
    • Distribution and Logistics: Despite significant efforts, home delivery and distribution channel issues persisted, particularly affecting non-PMUY consumers, leading to slow refill rates and hindering the seamless supply of LPG.
    • Price Volatility: Indian households have experienced a near-doubling in LPG prices since May 2020 in nominal terms due to volatile international prices, especially since the Russian war against Ukraine. This price volatility affects the affordability and accessibility of LPG for consumers.
    • Import Dependency: India’s dependence on imported LPG (the refined commodity) has steadily increased to over 64% in FY23, compared to 46% in the pre-PMUY phase. This import dependency exposes the country to international market risks and supply disruptions.
    • Budgetary Constraints: Given the domestic budget’s reliance on petroleum taxation and uncertain international prices, it is unlikely that India can return to a regime where a subsidy of approximately INR 20,000 crore (2011–12 prices) was provided each year for LPG consumption over the first two decades of the 21st century.

    Steps and a data-driven approach for India’s clean cooking transition

    • Promote Electric Cooking: India should actively promote electric cooking, including induction cook-tops, to offset the reliance on flame-based cooking. The IRES conducted by CEEW showed that even at a high tariff of ₹8 per unit of electricity, electric cooking remains cheaper than LPG cooking at current prices.
    • Leverage Electricity Access in Rural Areas: With near-universal access to electricity connections in rural areas, specific cooking needs can be shifted to electricity. This approach can effectively reduce the reliance on LPG in rural households.
    • Incentivize Transition to Electric Cooking: Policymakers can use a telescopically increasing LPG prices beyond a threshold, such as seven cylinders per average household.
    • Support Domestic Manufacturing Ecosystem: Demand from early adopters of electric cooking can spur the domestic manufacturing ecosystem for electric cooking technologies.
    • Monetize Avoided Emissions: By transitioning from traditional chulhas to electric cooking, India can avoid climate pollutant release. This can be monetized through the newly launched carbon market, providing financial resources to support the adoption of electric cooking by poorer rural communities.
    • Shift the Policy Focus: Policymakers need to move beyond LPG subsidies alone and focus on fostering a bouquet of solutions for India’s clean cooking goals.

    Conclusion

    • While LPG subsidies have played a crucial role in improving adoption, it is time for India’s clean cooking policy to diversify and embrace a range of clean-cooking technologies. By nurturing a bouquet of clean cooking solutions, India can pave the way for a sustainable and healthier future.