💥Mains Ready By December. Smash Mains & Smash PYQ Admissions Open
Talk to Mentor

Civilsdaily

Login

GS Paper: GS2

  • In news: Commission of Railway Safety (CRS)

    railway safety

    Central Idea: The Commissioner of Railway Safety (CRS) conducts investigations into train accidents, including the recent tragic train crash in Odisha.

    About Commissioner of Railway Safety (CRS)

    • Role of CRS: CRS is a government body responsible for railway safety oversight and carries out inspectorial, investigatory, and advisory functions as mandated by the Railways Act, 1989.
    • Headquarters: The CRS is headquartered in Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, and operates under the administrative control of the Ministry of Civil Aviation (MoCA).

    Evolution of CRS and Safety Oversight

    • Early Railways in India: Private companies constructed and operated the first railways in India in the 1800s, with the British Indian government appointing consulting engineers for control and oversight.
    • Establishment of Government Inspectors: The consulting engineers were later designated as government inspectors, and in 1883, their position was recognized statutorily.
    • Inclusion in the Railway Board: In the early 1900s, the Railway Inspectorate came under the Railway Board, established in 1905, making the board the safety controlling authority for Indian railways.

    Separation of Safety Oversight and Railway Board

    • Government of India Act, 1935: The act stated that an independent authority, separate from the Railway Board, should be responsible for ensuring the safety of railway operations.
    • Delayed Implementation: The outbreak of World War II in 1939 delayed the separation, and the Railway Inspectorate continued to function under the control of the Railway Board.
    • Mount Panel Report: In 1939, the Mount Panel recommended the separation of the Railway Inspectorate from the Railway Board, acknowledging the board’s agreement with the proposal.

    Transfer of Railway Inspectorate’s Control

    • Central Legislature’s Endorsement: In 1940, the Central Legislature endorsed the separation of the Railway Inspectorate from the Railway Board.
    • Administrative Control Shift: In May 1941, the Railway Inspectorate was transferred from the Railway Board’s control to the Department of Posts and Air.
    • Renaming as CRS: The Inspectorate was renamed as the Commissioner of Railway Safety (CRS) in 1961 and placed under the administrative control of the ministry overseeing civil aviation.

    Functions and Responsibilities of CRS

    • Railway Safety Oversight: CRS is responsible for ensuring the safety of rail travel and operations in India.
    • Inspectorial Functions: CRS conducts inspections of railway infrastructure, equipment, and operations to ensure compliance with safety standards.
    • Investigatory Functions: CRS conducts thorough investigations into serious train accidents to determine the causes and make recommendations for improvements.
    • Advisory Functions: CRS provides expert advice and recommendations to the Ministry of Civil Aviation and other stakeholders on matters related to railway safety.
    • Collaboration with Railway Authorities: CRS works closely with the Ministry of Railways and the Railway Board to address safety concerns and implement safety measures.
    • Cooperation with Other Agencies: CRS collaborates with other agencies and organizations involved in railway safety, such as the National Safety Council and the Indian Railways Institute of Civil Engineering.

    Why does it function under MCA?

    • Insulation from Railway Establishment: CRS operates under the administrative control of the Ministry of Civil Aviation to maintain independence and prevent conflicts of interest.
    • Objective Decision-Making: Independence from the railway establishment ensures impartiality in accident investigations and safety oversight.
    • Enhanced Credibility: The separation of CRS from the Railway Board enhances the credibility of safety oversight and investigations.

    Future Challenges and Priorities

    • Modernization and Technology Integration: CRS focuses on integrating advanced technologies and modernizing railway infrastructure to enhance safety.
    • Safety Culture and Behavioral Change: Promoting a strong safety culture and fostering behavioral change among railway staff and passengers are key priorities.
    • Addressing Emerging Risks: CRS continuously assesses and addresses emerging safety risks, such as cybersecurity threats and climate change impacts, in railway operations.

    International Collaboration and Best Practices

    • Knowledge Sharing: CRS actively participates in international forums and collaborates with global railway safety organizations to exchange best practices and enhance safety standards.
    • Benchmarking and Learning: CRS benchmarks its safety practices against international standards and adopts relevant best practices to improve railway safety in India.
    • Harmonization of Safety Regulations: CRS contributes to the harmonization of safety regulations and standards with international frameworks to ensure interoperability and seamless rail connectivity.

  • Addressing Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) in the Pandemic Treaty

    antimicrobial resistance amr

    Central Idea

    • Pandemic Treaty: The latest version of the draft Pandemic Instrument, also known as the “pandemic treaty,” was shared with Member States at the World Health Assembly.
    • Removal of AMR Mentions: It became apparent that all mentions of addressing antimicrobial resistance in the Pandemic Instrument were at risk of removal.

    What is AMR?

    • Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is the development of resistance in microorganisms to drugs that were once effective against them.
    • Microorganisms, including bacteria, fungi, viruses, and parasites, can become “immune” to medications used to kill or control them.
    • Misuse or overuse of antibiotics can contribute to the development of AMR.

    About the Pandemic Treaty

    • Initiation of Work: Work on the Pandemic Instrument began in December 2021.
    • Objective: The instrument aims to protect nations and communities from future pandemic emergencies under the WHO’s Constitution.

    Importance of Addressing Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR)

    • Calls for Inclusion: Civil society and experts, including the Global Leaders Group on Antimicrobial Resistance, have emphasized the inclusion of AMR in the Pandemic Instrument.
    • Not Limited to Viruses: Not all pandemics in the past or future are caused by viruses, with bacterial pandemics like plague and cholera being devastating examples.
    • Impact of Bacterial Infections: Bacterial infections cause one in eight deaths globally and contribute to the rise of drug-resistant infections.

    Need for Comprehensive Pandemic Preparedness

    • Wider Range of Threats: Planning and developing effective tools to respond to a broader range of pandemic threats, beyond viruses, is crucial.
    • Secondary Bacterial Infections: Even in viral pandemics like COVID-19, secondary bacterial infections become a serious issue, requiring effective antibiotics.

    Concerns over Potential Removal of AMR Measures

    • Risk to Future Pandemics: The removal of AMR measures from the Pandemic Instrument could hinder efforts to protect people from future pandemics.
    • At-Risk Measures: Measures at risk of removal include better access to safe water, infection prevention and control, integrated surveillance, and antimicrobial stewardship.

    Strengthening the Pandemic Instrument to Address AMR

    • Inclusion of AMR Measures: Measures to address AMR can be easily incorporated into the Pandemic Instrument.
    • Recommendations for Inclusion: Recommendations include addressing bacterial pathogens, tracking viral and bacterial threats, and harmonizing AMR stewardship rules.

    Efforts to Highlight AMR in the Pandemic Instrument

    • Involvement of Specialized Organizations: Civil society and research organizations participated in the WHO’s Intergovernmental Negotiating Body, providing analysis on AMR in the draft.
    • Publication of Special Edition: Leading academic researchers and experts published a special edition outlining the importance of addressing AMR in the Pandemic Instrument.

    Current State and Next Steps

    • Concerns over Removal: Insertions related to AMR are at risk of removal after closed-door negotiations by Member States.
    • Importance of the Pandemic Instrument: The instrument is vital for mitigating AMR and safeguarding antimicrobials for treating secondary infections in pandemics.
    • Global Political Action: Collaboration and collective efforts are needed to address AMR and support the conservation and equitable distribution of safe and effective antimicrobials.

    Safeguarding Antimicrobials for Future Pandemic Response

    • Undermining Goals: Missing the opportunity to address AMR in the Pandemic Instrument undermines its broader goals of protecting nations and communities.
    • Core Role of Antimicrobials: Antimicrobials are essential resources for responding to pandemics and must be protected.
    • Call for Strengthened Measures: Member States should strengthen measures to safeguard antimicrobials and support actions for conserving their effectiveness within the instrument.

  • Places: Kakhovka Dam in Ukraine

    kakhova

    Central Idea

    • Breach of the Dnipro River Dam: A Soviet-era Kakhovka Dam on the Dnipro River in southern Ukraine was breached, resulting in floodwaters spreading across the war zone.
    • Conflicting Accounts: Ukraine accused Russia of destroying the dam, while Russian officials provided differing explanations, suggesting Ukrainian shelling or prior damage as potential causes.

    The Kakhovka Dam

    • Construction and Purpose: The Kakhovka Dam was built in 1956 as part of the Khakhovka hydroelectric power plant, with a height of 30 meters (98 feet) and a length of 3.2 kilometres (2 miles).
    • Water Supply: The dam’s reservoir supplies water to the Crimean peninsula, claimed by Russia since 2014, and the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant, which is also under Russian control.
    • Reservoir Capacity: The reservoir holds approximately 18 cubic km of water, comparable in volume to the Great Salt Lake in Utah, USA.

    Accounts of the Dam Breach

    • Ukrainian Accusations: Ukraine attributed responsibility to Russia, stating that the dam was destroyed by “Russian terrorists” and accusing Russian occupying forces of the act.
    • Russian Claims: Russian-installed officials offered conflicting accounts, with some blaming Ukraine for shelling the dam, while others asserted that the dam collapsed due to pre-existing damage and water pressure.

    Human Impact and Evacuations

    • Potential Flooding: The surge in water levels poses a significant risk, potentially impacting thousands of people in the affected areas.
    • Evacuations: Evacuation efforts commenced on both sides of the front line to ensure the safety of civilians.
    • Population at Risk: Russian-installed officials indicated that 22,000 individuals across 14 settlements in Ukraine’s southern Kherson region were at risk of flooding, while the Ukrainian Prime Minister noted that up to 80 settlements were in danger.

    Impact on Crimea

    • Water Supply Concerns: The rupture of the dam raises concerns about water levels in the North Crimea Canal, which supplies fresh water to the Crimea peninsula from the Dnipro River.
    • Dependence on Canal: Crimea depends on the canal for fresh water, and its previous blockage by Ukraine after the 2014 annexation caused water shortages in the region.
    • Potential Consequences: Decreased water levels in the canal could have significant implications for water supply in Crimea.

    Other hotspots under threat: Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant

    • Cooling Water Source: The Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant, Europe’s largest, relies on the reservoir as a source of cooling water.
    • Russian Control: The plant is located on the southern side of the conflict zone, which is currently under Russian control.
    • Nuclear Safety Assurance: The International Atomic Energy Agency stated that there was no immediate nuclear safety risk at the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant, and Russia’s state nuclear energy company affirmed that there was no threat to the plant.

    Try this question from CS Prelims 2023

    Consider the following pairs:

    Regions often mentioned in news: Reason for being in news

    1. North Kivu and Ituri: War between Armenia and Azerbaijan
    2. Nagorno-Karabakh: Insurgency in Mozambique
    3. Kherson and Zaporizhzhia: Dispute between Israel and Lebanon

    How many of the above pairs are correctly matched?

    (a) Only one

    (b) Only two

    (c) All three

    (d) None

  • Ensuring Stability and Peace on the Line of Actual Control (LAC)

    LAC

    Central Idea

    • The Line of Actual Control (LAC) between India and China has been a hotbed of tension and occasional clashes in recent years, posing a significant risk of escalation. Both countries have invested heavily in defensive preparedness and military infrastructure near the LAC. While a permanent solution may not be immediately achievable due to the complexity of the border dispute, short-term and pragmatic steps can be implemented to reduce the chances of conflict and foster peaceful coexistence

    Inadequacies in Existing Agreements

    • Lack of Clarity on LAC: The agreements are based on the assumption that both parties have a clear understanding and definition of the LAC. However, in reality, there are significant segments of the border where the exact demarcation is disputed or lacks clarity.
    • Insufficient Mechanisms for Dispute Resolution: The 1993 Agreement called for the creation of joint mechanisms to verify and settle LAC-related disputes. However, it took 19 years for the establishment of the Working Mechanism for Consultation and Coordination on India-China Border Affairs (WMCC) in 2012. While the WMCC meets twice a year, its effectiveness in resolving disputes and preventing escalations on the ground has been limited.
    • Limited Border Personnel Meeting (BPM) Points: The LAC, which stretches for 3,488 kilometers, currently has only four established BPM points. The 2005 Protocol proposed the establishment of a BPM point at Lipulekh, but it has not been implemented.
    • Lack of Progress in Force Reduction and Redeployment: The agreements, such as the 1993 Agreement and the 1996 Agreement, envisioned a mutually agreed reduction and redeployment of forces along the LAC. However, there has been little progress in implementing these provisions. The absence of substantial force reductions contributes to the prevailing tensions and increases the risk of confrontations.

    Facts for prelims

    States Border with China Important Passes
    Jammu and Kashmir 1597 km Khardung La Pass, Chang La Pass, Marsimik La Pass, Saser La Pass
    Arunachal Pradesh

     

    		 1126 km

     

    		 Bum La Pass, Kibithu Pass, Tawang
    Uttarakhand 345 km Mana Pass, Lipulekh Pass, Niti Pass
    Sikkim 220 km Nathu La Pass, Jelep La Pass
    Himachal Pradesh 200 km Shipki La Pass, Kaurik Pass

    The Need for Effective and Immediate Measures

    • Fragile and Dangerous Situation: As stated by India’s External Affairs Minister, the situation along the LAC in Eastern Ladakh remains fragile and dangerous from a military assessment perspective. The potential for escalation and the risk of conflict are significant.
    • Escalation of Aggression: Following the Galwan crisis, there has been a significant mobilization of Chinese forces into Tibet, accompanied by heightened rhetoric and jingoism from both countries.
    • Complexity of Border Dispute: The border dispute between India and China, encompassing areas such as Arunachal Pradesh and Aksai Chin, is intricate and has deep historical and geopolitical roots. Achieving a permanent solution to the dispute may not be immediately feasible.
    • Uncertainty of War Outcomes: While there might be voices advocating for a more confrontational approach, it is essential to consider the potential outcomes of a full-fledged war. Despite assurances from the government, there is no guarantee that the results of such a conflict would be favorable to either India or China.

    Proposed Steps for Peace and Stability

    • Conversion of LAC into a Line of Control (LC): Both India and China should delineate the LAC on maps and on the ground without prejudicing their respective border claims. This transformation would help reduce the urge among forward troops to make incremental advances and could be accomplished through mature dialogue and the use of technology.
    • Treatment of Disputed Areas as No Entry Zones or Joint Patrolling: The disputed areas along the LAC could be designated as no entry zones, preventing either side from establishing a permanent presence. Alternatively, both countries can explore the possibility of allowing mutually agreed-upon patrolling of these areas. Joint patrolling would help maintain the status quo and build confidence between the troops.
    • Strengthening Existing Confidence Building Measures (CBMs): The WMCC, established in 2012, should be empowered with more authority and resources to effectively address LAC-related disputes. Additionally, establishing more BPM points along the LAC would facilitate quicker resolution of local issues and enhance communication and cooperation between the Indian and Chinese troops.

    Conclusion

    • The tense situation along the Line of Actual Control calls for immediate action to ensure stability and prevent the outbreak of a major conflict. It is crucial for both nations to prioritize dialogue, cooperation, and a commitment to regional stability in order to safeguard their own interests as well as those of the world, politically and economically.

    Also read:

    India-China clash: Why China has opened new front?

     

  • Law Commission Report on Adverse Possession

    adverse possession

    Central Idea

    • The recent report by the Law Commission on the law of adverse possession provides an overview of adverse possession, its historical origins, and its current provisions under the Limitation Act of 1963.

    Adverse Possession

    DEFINITION It refers to the hostile possession of property, which must be continuous, uninterrupted, and peaceful.
    Historical Background Historical roots dating back to the Hammurabi Code and developed through statutes of limitation in England.

    The first attempt to introduce the law of limitation in India was through the “Act XIV of 1859,” regulating civil suits.
    Provisions of the Limitation Act, 1963 The burden of proof for adverse possession shifted to the claimant, who must show continuous possession for a specified period.
    SC Recommendations for Changes in the Law Hemaji Waghaji Jat v. Bhikhabhai Khengarbhai Harijan and Others (2008) case: The SC criticized the law of adverse possession as irrational and placing a premium on dishonesty.

    • The SC recommended a fresh look at the law and urged the government to make suitable changes.
    Recent Law Commission Report
    • There is no justification for changing the law on adverse possession.
    • Two ex officio members of the Commission filed a dissent note, arguing that the law promotes false claims and should be struck off.
    Dissenting Opinions and Criticisms
    • It questioned the contradictory requirement of peaceful and hostile possession in adverse possession cases.
    • It argued that the law burdens the courts with unnecessary litigation and promotes false claims.

     

  • Duty-Free Quota Free (DFQF) Scheme

    Central Idea

    • India offers a duty-free quota-free (DFQF) scheme to least developed countries (LDCs) under the World Trade Organisation (WTO).
    • A report by the LDC Group reveals that about 85% of the products offered by India remain unutilised under the DFQF scheme.

    World Trade Organisation (WTO)
    Establishment The WTO was established on January 1, 1995, following the Uruguay Round of Negotiations conducted from 1986 to 1994.
    Nature The WTO is the only global international organization dedicated to regulating trade rules between nations.
    Successor to GATT It is the successor to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), which was in place from 1948 to 1994.
    Objectives To facilitate the smooth, predictable, and unrestricted flow of international trade.
    Working Principles Based on the principles of MFN and national treatment, ensuring equal and non-discriminatory treatment.
    Member-Driven Organization Governed by its member governments, and decisions are made through consensus among these members.
    Special and Differential Treatment for Developing Countries The WTO provides specific flexibilities and rights to least developed countries (LDCs) and developing nations.

     

    DFQF Scheme

    • The DFQF access for LDCs was initially decided at the WTO Hong Kong Ministerial Meeting in 2005.
    • India became the first developing country to extend this facility to LDCs in 2008, providing preferential market access on 85% of its total tariff lines.
    • The scheme was expanded in 2014, offering preferential market access on about 98.2% of India’s tariff lines to LDCs.

    Issues highlighted by WTO

    (1) Tariff Line Utilisation Data

    • WTO data from 2020 indicates that 85% of the tariff lines offered by India under the DFQF scheme show zero utilisation rate.
    • China’s utilisation rate for similar tariff lines is 64%, with only 8% of the lines showing a utilisation rate above 95%.
    • Utilisation rates for beneficiary LDCs vary significantly, with Guinea and Bangladesh having low rates (8% and 0% respectively), while Benin reports the highest utilisation rate of 98%.

    (2) Non-Preferential Tariff Route

    • Similar to China, significant amounts of LDC exports enter India under the non-preferential (most favoured nation) tariff route, despite being covered by the Indian preference scheme.
    • The report highlights the importance of preference margins, indicating potential duty savings.
    • For example, fixed vegetable oil exported from Bangladesh to India has a preference margin of 77.5 percentage points, implying a potential $74 million duty savings if the preference scheme were utilized.

    Challenges and Barriers

    • The report suggests that the low utilisation of the preference scheme by LDCs is not due to exporter awareness but rather existing barriers that hinder the effective use of preferences.
    • The specific barriers preventing LDCs from fully utilizing the scheme are not mentioned in the article.

  • [VERY IMPORTANT] Executive Democracy vs Parliamentary Democracy

    Parliament

    Central Idea

    • The recent inauguration of a new Parliament building in India was accompanied by both grandeur and controversy. While the exclusion of the President and the symbolic gestures surrounding the Sengol stirred significant debate, there is a deeper issue that remains overlooked the growing subordination of Parliament in India’s parliamentary democracy and the emergence of Executive democracy.

    What is mean by Parliamentary Democracy?

    • Parliamentary democracy is a form of government in which the executive branch, headed by a Prime Minister or equivalent position, derives its legitimacy and authority from the legislative branch, known as Parliament. In this system, the executive is accountable to Parliament and relies on its support to govern effectively.

    What is mean by Executive Democracy?

    • Executive democracy refers to a form of governance where the executive branch of government holds a dominant or disproportionate amount of power and influence compared to other branches, such as the legislature or judiciary. In an executive democracy, the executive branch, usually headed by a President or Prime Minister, exercises significant control over policy-making and decision-making processes

    Executive Democracy vs. Parliamentary Democracy

    Aspect Executive Democracy Parliamentary Democracy
    Concentration of Power Executive branch holds dominant power and control Power is shared between executive and legislature
    Decision-making Decisions made primarily by the executive Decisions made through deliberation in Parliament
    Checks and Balances Limited checks on executive power Robust system of checks and balances
    Accountability Limited avenues for holding executive accountable Strong mechanisms to ensure executive accountability
    Legislative Influence Legislature may have limited influence Legislature plays a significant role in shaping policies
    Separation of Powers Potential for blurred separation of powers Clear separation of powers between branches
    Opposition Role Opposition may have limited influence Opposition has an important role in holding the government accountable
    Civic Engagement Limited avenues for civic engagement Opportunities for civic engagement and participation
    Pluralism and Representation Potential for limited representation of diverse interests Emphasis on diverse representation and pluralism
    Policy Stability Potentially streamlined decision-making Decision-making through debate and deliberation
    Potential for Authoritarianism Increased risk of authoritarian tendencies Strong democratic safeguards against authoritarianism

    How the safeguards against executive dominance are being diluted?

    • Intra-Party Dissent: The anti-defection law, introduced through the Tenth Schedule to the Constitution in 1985, suppresses intra-party dissent by disqualifying members who defy the party whip. Despite its intention to curb horse-trading and unprincipled floor-crossing, this law has reinforced the power of party leadership, particularly the executive, while making intra-party dissent more difficult due to the risk of disqualification from Parliament.
    • Limited Space for Opposition: Unlike other parliamentary democracies, the Indian Constitution does not allocate specific space for the political opposition in the House. As a result, parliamentary proceedings are largely under the control of the executive, leaving no constitutional checks on how that control is exercised. This hampers the opposition’s ability to hold the executive accountable.
    • Partisan Speakers: The Speaker, who should be an impartial authority representing the interests of Parliament, often acts in a partisan manner.
    • Undermining the Role of the Upper House: The Upper House’s role is further undermined by the misclassification of bills and the constitutional power to issue ordinances. Ordinances, meant for emergency situations when Parliament is not in session, are increasingly used as a parallel process of law-making, bypassing the scrutiny of the Upper House and creating a fait accompli.

    Parliament

    The implications of executive dominance

    • Weakened Checks and Balances: Executive dominance can undermine the system of checks and balances that is vital for democratic governance. When the executive branch holds excessive power, the ability of other institutions, such as the legislature and judiciary, to effectively monitor and limit executive actions can be compromised.
    • Reduced Accountability: The concentration of power in the executive can diminish accountability mechanisms. Transparency and oversight mechanisms may suffer, limiting public scrutiny and the ability to hold the government accountable for its decisions, actions, and policies.
    • Limited Legislative Influence: Executive dominance may curtail the influence and effectiveness of the legislature. The executive may have significant control over the legislative agenda, which can limit the ability of lawmakers to shape policies, propose amendments, and exercise meaningful oversight.
    • Diminished Role of Opposition: Executive dominance can marginalize the role and impact of the political opposition. With limited avenues to influence decision-making, the opposition’s ability to present alternative viewpoints, challenge government actions, and hold the executive accountable may be restricted.
    • Impaired Deliberative Democracy: Executive dominance may result in limited deliberation and debate on important legislative matters. When decision-making is centralized in the executive, opportunities for comprehensive discussion, public input, and the exploration of diverse perspectives may be diminished.
    • Potential for Policy Capture: Concentrated executive power can create opportunities for special interest groups or powerful individuals to exert undue influence over policy decisions. This can lead to policy capture, favoritism, and a lack of equitable representation of diverse interests.
    • Threat to Judicial Independence: Executive dominance can pose risks to the independence of the judiciary. The executive’s influence over judicial appointments and the potential for encroachment on the judiciary’s autonomy can undermine the impartial administration of justice and compromise the protection of individual rights.
    • Democratic Backsliding: Excessive executive dominance without proper checks and balances can contribute to democratic backsliding. It can erode democratic norms, undermine institutional integrity, and potentially lead to authoritarian tendencies.

    Facts for prelims: key constitutional provisions related to India’s parliamentary democracy

    Constitutional Provision Description
    The Preamble Declares India as a sovereign, socialist, secular, and democratic republic
    Article 79 Establishes the Parliament of India as the supreme legislative body
    Article 74 Outlines the role and powers of the President as the head of the executive branch
    Article 75 Deals with the appointment and powers of the Prime Minister
    Article 86 Outlines the powers and functions of the Rajya Sabha (Upper House of Parliament)
    Article 105 Grants privileges and immunities to members of Parliament
    Article 266 Establishes the Consolidated Fund of India and Contingency Fund of India
    Article 368 Outlines the procedure for amending the Constitution of India
    Article 226 Grants High Courts the power to issue writs and remedies for the enforcement of rights and laws

    Parliament

    Way forward: Restoring the prominence of Parliament

    • Review and Amend the Anti-Defection Law: Revisit the anti-defection law, Tenth Schedule of the Constitution, to strike a balance between party discipline and intra-party dissent. The law should focus on curbing unprincipled floor-crossing while allowing space for lawmakers to express dissenting views within their parties.
    • Strengthen Opposition Rights: Allocate specific space and time for the political opposition in the House to hold the executive accountable. Consider implementing sessions like Prime Minister’s questions, where the Prime Minister faces direct questioning from the Leader of the Opposition and other politicians.
    • Enhance Impartiality of the Speaker: Encourage the Speaker to act independently and impartially by introducing reforms that require the Speaker to relinquish party membership and impose constitutional obligations to ensure neutrality and fairness in conducting House proceedings.
    • Preserve the Role of the Upper House: Protect the role and importance of the Upper House, the Rajya Sabha, by ensuring that bills are not misclassified as “money bills” to bypass its scrutiny. Limit the misuse of ordinances to maintain the integrity and effectiveness of the legislative process.
    • Strengthen Parliamentary Oversight: Enhance the capacity of parliamentary committees to scrutinize executive actions, policies, and budgets effectively. Provide them with adequate resources and powers to conduct thorough investigations and hold the government accountable.
    • Public Participation and Transparency: Promote public participation in the legislative process by making parliamentary proceedings more accessible to the public through live streaming, public consultations, and the dissemination of information. Enhance transparency by ensuring timely publication of bills, reports, and other parliamentary documents.
    • Judicial Independence and Judicial Review: Uphold the independence of the judiciary and ensure that it acts as a strong check on executive power. Respect the decisions of the judiciary and safeguard its autonomy to ensure that laws and executive actions align with the constitution and protect individual rights.

    Conclusion

    • While the inauguration of a new Parliament building attracts attention, it is imperative to address the underlying issue of the increasing subordination of Parliament in India’s democracy. Restoring the prominence of Parliament in the democratic process necessitates comprehensive constitutional changes and reforms. Only then can India reclaim its status as a robust parliamentary democracy.

     

  • Asymmetric Federalism: Examining the Impact of the Delhi Ordinance

    Federalism

    Central Idea

    • The recent promulgation of an ordinance by the Union government, amending the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (NCTD) Act, 1991, has raised concerns about federalism, democracy, bureaucratic accountability, executive law-making, and judicial review. This move nullified the Supreme Court judgment that recognized the elected government of Delhi’s legislative and administrative powers over services.

    What is mean by asymmetric federalism?

    • Asymmetric federalism refers to a governance model in which different regions or constituent units within a country are granted varying degrees of autonomy or special provisions based on their unique characteristics, circumstances, or historical factors.
    • It recognizes that not all regions or constituent units are the same and may require different arrangements to accommodate their specific needs and aspirations

    Key points regarding Delhi’s unique position and asymmetric federalism

    • Sui generis status: The Supreme Court recognized that the addition of Article 239AA in the Constitution granted the National Capital Territory of Delhi (NCTD) a distinct and special status. This acknowledgment indicates that Delhi does not fit neatly into the category of either a full-fledged state or a union territory.
    • Examples of special governance arrangements: India’s federal system already incorporates examples of asymmetric federalism. For instance, the special provisions under Article 370 (before its dilution) for Jammu and Kashmir and the protections provided under Article 371, as well as the 5th and 6th Schedule Areas, demonstrate the existence of differential treatment based on regional considerations.
    • Legislative and administrative powers: The Supreme Court’s verdict on May 11 acknowledged that the elected government of Delhi possesses legislative and administrative powers over certain subjects, including services. This recognition further solidifies the idea that Delhi operates under a distinctive constitutional framework, allowing it to exercise powers similar to those of states.
    • Federal entity status: While Delhi remains a Union Territory, the Court’s judgment emphasized that the unique constitutional status conferred upon it makes it a federal entity. This recognition affirms the existence of a distinct arrangement for Delhi within India’s federal structure.
    • Contrasts with Jammu and Kashmir: It is worth noting that the Court’s application of asymmetric federalism principles in Delhi contrasts with the situation in Jammu and Kashmir, where similar principles were not upheld. This discrepancy highlights the need for consistent application and recognition of federalism across different regions.

    Inconsistent Application of Asymmetric Federalism

    • Differential treatment: Inconsistencies arise when different regions or constituent units within a country receive varying degrees of autonomy, special provisions, or protections based on their unique characteristics, historical factors, or political considerations.
    • Unequal distribution of powers: In some cases, certain regions may enjoy greater devolved powers, legislative authority, or administrative autonomy compared to others. This disparity can create imbalances in decision-making and resource allocation, leading to perceptions of favoritism or discrimination.
    • Varying levels of cultural or linguistic protections: Asymmetric federalism may involve granting special cultural or linguistic protections to specific regions or constituent units. However, the extent and nature of these protections can differ, leading to disparities in the preservation and promotion of cultural diversity and linguistic rights.
    • Financial arrangements: Inconsistent application of asymmetric federalism can also manifest in the distribution of financial resources. Some regions may benefit from preferential funding or fiscal arrangements, while others may receive fewer resources, resulting in economic disparities and regional imbalances.
    • Selective application based on political considerations: In some cases, the application of asymmetric federalism may be influenced by political factors, resulting in inconsistent treatment. Regions that align with the ruling party or have greater political influence may receive more favourable treatment, while others may be neglected or marginalized.
    • Perception of unfairness and tensions: Inconsistencies in the application of asymmetric federalism can lead to a sense of unfairness, grievances, and tensions among regions or constituent units. This can undermine trust, unity, and cooperative governance within a federal system.

    Facts for prelims

    Article Description
    Article 123 Empowers the President to issue ordinances during Parliament’s recess.
    Article 239 Deals with the administration of Union Territories.
    Article 239A Provides for the creation of a Legislative Assembly for the Union Territory of Delhi.
    Article 239AA Contains special provisions for the Union Territory of Delhi, including the establishment of a Legislative Assembly and governance structure.
    Article 368 Outlines the procedure for amending the Constitution.
    Article 144 Deals with the binding nature of the Supreme Court’s judgments on all courts and authorities in India.
    Article 213 Empowers the Governor of a state to promulgate ordinances during the recess of the state legislature.

    Challenges Posed by the Ordinance

    • Judicial independence: The swift and brazen act of undoing a Supreme Court judgment through an ordinance raises concerns about judicial independence. While the legislature has the authority to alter the legal basis of a judgment, directly overruling it undermines the independence of the judiciary.
    • Executive overreach: The use of an ordinance, which is meant to address extraordinary situations, for political ends raises questions about executive overreach. The Supreme Court has previously held that ordinances should not be perverted to serve political objectives, indicating that their use should be limited and justified.
    • Constitutional subterfuge: The ordinance adds an additional subject of exemption (services) to the legislative power of Delhi without amending the Constitution. This raises concerns about constitutional subterfuge, as it potentially circumvents the constitutional amendment process and undermines the constitutional framework.
    • Bureaucratic accountability: The creation of a National Capital Civil Service Authority, where appointed bureaucrats can overrule an elected Chief Minister, undermines established norms of bureaucratic accountability. This consolidation of power in the hands of bureaucrats weakens democratic principles and dilutes the authority of elected representatives.
    • Assault on federalism: The ordinance directly assaults the principles of federalism by limiting the control and decision-making power of the elected government of Delhi. It erodes the federal structure by introducing a mechanism where Union-appointed bureaucrats and the Lieutenant Governor can overrule the decisions of the Chief Minister and the elected government.
    • Threat to democracy: The ordinance’s provisions, including the majority voting system and the decision-making authority of the Lieutenant Governor, raise concerns about democratic principles. By allowing unelected officials to wield significant power over elected representatives, it undermines the democratic ideals of representative governance and the will of the people.

    Way Ahead: The Need for a New Politics of Federalism

    • Protection of constitutional values: As the foundations of India’s constitutionalism are threatened, a new politics of federalism is required to safeguard the core values enshrined in the Constitution. Federalism serves as a vital mechanism to ensure a balance of power, protect the rights of states and regions, and uphold democratic principles.
    • Counter-hegemonic idea: By championing the principles of decentralization, autonomy, and cooperative governance, a renewed focus on federalism can challenge the concentration of power and promote a more inclusive and participatory political system.
    • Normative framework: Opposition parties often fail to take a principled stance on federalism or articulate it as a normative idea. A new politics of federalism should aim to establish federalism as a guiding principle based on first principles, emphasizing the importance of cooperative governance, checks and balances, and the protection of regional diversity.
    • Articulating underlying values: A reimagined politics of federalism should consistently articulate the underlying values of federal governance. This includes recognizing the interplay between federalism and democracy, understanding the diverse interests and aspirations of regions, and ensuring equitable distribution of powers, resources, and opportunities.
    • Balancing the centre-state dynamics: A robust politics of federalism can foster a healthy balance between the central government and the states or regions. It should promote dialogue, cooperation, and respect for the autonomy and authority of elected representatives at all levels.

    Conclusion

    • The recent ordinance amending the Government of NCTD Act has ignited debates about federalism, democracy, and bureaucratic accountability. Opposition parties must recognize the importance of federalism as a guiding principle and act to safeguard it. The protection of federalism requires a principled approach that upholds democratic values and ensures the balance of power between different tiers of government.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your personal mentor for UPSC 2024 | Schedule your FREE session and get the Prelims prep Toolkit!

    Also read:

    Delhi Governance New Ordinance

  • Manipur: The Demand for Separate Administration and the Challenges Ahead

    Manipur

    Central Idea

    • The recent demand for a separate administration in Manipur has sparked widespread discussions on the sanctity of borders and the territorial integrity of the state. The demand, supported by various Kuki-Zo legislators highlights the alleged tacit support of the Manipur government towards violence against the Chin-Kuki-Mizo-Zomi hill tribals. The counter-response from Meitei groups advocating for the protection of the state’s territorial integrity further complicates the situation.

    Causes of the riots in Manipur

    • The principal cause of the riots in Manipur is the failure of the state government to recognize and accommodate the territorial rights and identities of the different communities in the state.
    • The state’s aggressive integrationist project, which seeks to dissolve tribal land rights in the valley areas, has been a major source of tension between the Meitei and tribal communities.
    • Additionally, in April 2023, The Manipur High Court’s order to expedite the recommendation for granting ST status to the Meiteis further inflamed the tribal sentiments and led to the massive protest on May 3.

    Factors contributing to the increasing demand for a separate administration in Manipur

    • Ethnic Tensions and Divisions: Manipur is home to diverse ethnic communities, including the Kuki-Zo and Meitei groups. Ethnic tensions and historical divisions have persisted for years, leading to a sense of marginalization and a desire for separate administrative arrangements.
    • Failure of Previous Arrangements: Previous attempts to address the concerns of tribal communities, such as the proposal for a Union Territory or inclusion in the Sixth Schedule, have been perceived as inadequate or non-serious. The lack of tangible progress has intensified the demand for a more comprehensive and separate administrative setup.
    • Demographic Changes and Displacement: The extensive violence, displacement of populations, destruction of property, and loss of lives in recent times have significantly altered the demographic landscape of Manipur. These changes have deepened the divide between different communities and created a sense of irreparable separation.
    • Economic Considerations: The Kuki-Zo-dominated districts of Manipur, such as Pherzawl and Churachandpur, possess valuable natural resources and strategic gateways to Southeast Asia. Proponents of a separate administration argue that harnessing these resources and leveraging the region’s economic potential would be better served under a distinct administrative framework.
    • Lack of Trust in the Current System: The demand for a separate administration reflects a deep-seated mistrust in the existing political and administrative structures. Some communities believe that their interests and concerns are not adequately represented or addressed within the current system, leading to a call for a separate administrative entity.
    • Popular Support and Mobilization: The current demand for a separate administration enjoys unprecedented popular support among the Kuki-Zo groups. This widespread backing has galvanized community members and fueled a sustained mobilization effort, making the demand a significant force in Manipur’s political landscape.
    • Alleged Government Support for Violence: The demand stems from allegations that the Manipur government has tacitly supported violence against the Chin-Kuki-Mizo-Zomi hill tribals. The perception of government inaction or indifference has fuelled discontent among the affected communities.

    Constitutional Challenges for the implementation of a separate administration in Manipur

    • Article 3 of the Constitution: The power to effect changes in a state’s border lies with the central government, as outlined in Article 3 of the Constitution. This provision grants unilateral power to the center to alter state boundaries.
    • Opposition from Naga Groups: Granting a separate administration for Kuki-Zo in Manipur’s hill areas could face opposition from certain Naga groups. These groups may be reluctant to compromise on their territorial aspirations, particularly concerning the Naga’s demand for a sovereign ‘Nagalim.’ Finding a resolution that satisfies the demands of both communities is a significant challenge.
    • Resistance from the State Government and Meitei Groups: The Manipur state government and Meitei groups may staunchly oppose the demand for a separate administration. They might advocate for maintaining the territorial integrity of Manipur and resist any attempts to alter the administrative setup.
    • Revisiting Constitutional Arrangements: Establishing a separate administration in Manipur would necessitate revisiting and potentially amending the existing constitutional arrangements. This could involve dissolving sub-state constitutional asymmetrical arrangements, such as Article 371C, district councils, and tribal land rights.
    • Overlapping Ethnic Boundaries: Manipur’s ethnic dynamics present a challenge when determining the territorial boundaries of a separate administration. Some districts, such as Chandel, Kamjong, and Tengnoupal, have mixed populations and historical territorial disputes between the Kukis and Nagas. Resolving these territorial complexities and addressing the concerns of all communities is a delicate task.
    • Economic Viability: Critics may raise concerns about the financial sustainability and resource allocation for the proposed administrative entity. Demonstrating the economic potential and strategic advantages of a separate administration is crucial to counter these arguments.

    Facts for prelims: Major tribes of Manipur

    • Naga Tribes: The Nagas are one of the largest and most prominent tribes in Manipur. They are primarily concentrated in the hill areas of the state, and are known for their distinct culture and traditions.
    • Kuki Tribes: The Kukis are another major tribe in Manipur, and are also primarily concentrated in the hill areas. They are known for their love of music and dance, and have a rich cultural heritage.
    • Meitei Tribe: The Meitei are the dominant community in the valley areas of Manipur, and have their own distinct language and culture. They are known for their love of traditional sports such as Thang Ta (a form of martial arts) and Sagol Kangjei (a game similar to polo).
    • Hmar Tribe: The Hmars are a smaller tribe in Manipur, but are still an important part of the state’s cultural fabric. They are known for their traditional dance forms, such as the Cheraw and Chheihlam
    • Zomi Tribe: The Zomis are another smaller tribe in Manipur, but are spread across several states in Northeast India. They are known for their love of music and dance, and have a rich cultural heritage.
    • Pangal Tribe: The Pangal tribe, also known as the Manipuri Muslims, is a minority community in Manipur. They have a distinct culture and language and are primarily concentrated in the valley region.
    • Anal Tribe: The Anal tribe is a smaller ethnic group in Manipur and is primarily concentrated in the hill areas. They have a unique culture and are known for their traditional dress, dance, and music.

    Way ahead

    • Dialogue and Negotiation: Facilitating a dialogue between the various stakeholders, including the Kuki-Zo groups, Meitei communities, Nagas, and the state government, is essential. Open and constructive discussions can help identify common ground and potential areas of compromise.
    • Constitutional Reforms: Given the constitutional complexities involved, exploring options for constitutional reforms may be necessary. This could involve amending Article 3 to ensure greater involvement of the affected states in decisions regarding border changes, thereby addressing concerns about the exercise of unilateral power by the Centre.
    • Devolution of Power: Considering the overlapping ethnic boundaries in Manipur’s districts, there could be a focus on devolving power and granting autonomy to local communities within a framework of non-territorial and territorial autonomy.
    • Resource Management and Economic Development: Strategically leveraging the rich natural resources and strategic gateways in the Kuki-Zo-dominated districts, such as the natural gas belt and access to Southeast Asia, can contribute to the economic development of the region and provide incentives for a separate administration.
      Inclusive Governance: Any solution should prioritize inclusive governance that recognizes and respects the rights and aspirations of all communities in Manipur. Ensuring equitable representation, protection of minority rights, and mechanisms for peaceful coexistence are essential components of a sustainable way forward.
    • Learning from International Examples: Drawing lessons from federal polities like Belgium, Canada, the Netherlands, and Switzerland, where territorial divisions have been managed successfully, can provide valuable insights. Understanding their experiences and practices in accommodating territorially mobilized groups can inform the way forward in Manipur.
    • Building Trust and Reconciliation: Addressing historical grievances, fostering social harmony, and promoting reconciliation among communities are crucial for long-term stability. Efforts should be made to build trust, bridge divides, and promote understanding among different ethnic groups in Manipur.

    Conclusion

    • With unprecedented popular support and the Rubicon of division already crossed, Manipur faces constitutional challenges in effecting this demand. The unresolved debate surrounding Manipur’s administrative future hinges on aligning agendas, ideas, and interests across India’s multi-level federal polity and processes.

    Get an IAS/IPS ranker as your personal mentor for UPSC 2024 | Schedule your FREE session and get the Prelims prep Toolkit!

    Also read:

    [Burning Issue] Manipur Ethnic Violence

     

  • Kerala High Court’s Ruling on Education Loan and Credit Scores

    loan

    Central Idea

    • Student’s credit score not a factor: Kerala High Court emphasizes that a student’s credit score should not be a determining factor in rejecting an education loan application, highlighting the importance of equal opportunities for students.
    • Importance of humanitarian approach: The court asserts that a humanitarian approach is necessary from banks while considering education loan applications, recognizing students as the “nation builders of tomorrow.”

    RBI Circular on Educational Loan Scheme

    • Model scheme for financial support: RBI has a model educational loan scheme prepared by the Indian Banks Association (IBA) to provide financial support to deserving students pursuing higher education, ensuring equal opportunities.
    • Adoption by scheduled commercial banks: In 2019, the RBI advised all scheduled commercial banks to adopt the educational loan scheme, aiming for consistent practices and adherence to principles outlined in the circular.

    Role of RBI in Education Loan Policies

    • Ensuring financial support: RBI’s circular and advisory role aim to ensure that deserving students are not denied the opportunity to pursue higher education due to financial constraints, promoting inclusive access to education loans.
    • Standardization and uniformity: The RBI’s model educational loan scheme and guidance seek to establish standardized practices across scheduled commercial banks, fostering fair and equitable access to education loans.

    What is CIBIL Score?

    • Numerical reflection of credit history: Credit scores, like the Credit Information Bureau (India) Limited (CIBIL) score, provide a numerical summary of an individual’s credit payment history across different loan types and institutions, aiding lenders in assessing creditworthiness.
    • Impact on loan applications: Credit scores play a crucial role in loan applications and financial assessments, serving as indicators of an individual’s ability to repay debts.

    Why Education Loan can be an exception?

    • Enabling pursuit of higher education: Education loans play a vital role in enabling students to pursue higher education, providing necessary financial support for tuition fees, living expenses, and educational costs.
    • Equal opportunities for students: Access to education loans ensures equal opportunities for students from diverse backgrounds, facilitating their academic aspirations and future contributions to society.
    • Implications of loan rejections: Loan rejections based solely on credit scores can hinder students’ educational prospects and limit their access to quality education and future career opportunities.

    Judicial perspective on Education Loan

    • Holistic evaluation beyond credit scores: Kerala HC emphasized the importance of considering the ground realities, future prospects, course potential, and scholarship opportunities for students in education loan applications, promoting a comprehensive assessment approach.
    • Upholding equal access for all: Key rulings such as KM George vs The Branch Manager and Pranav SR vs The Branch Manager underscore the court’s commitment to upholding principles of equal access to education loans and fair assessments.

    Significance of the Kerala HCs Ruling

    • Equal opportunities: The ruling ensures equal opportunities for students by emphasizing that credit scores should not be the sole basis for loan rejections, preventing students from being denied educational opportunities based on their credit history.
    • Humanitarian approach: The court’s emphasis on a humanitarian approach acknowledges the importance of considering students’ future potential and recognizes their role as future builders of the nation.
    • Fair assessment criteria: The ruling establishes the need for fair assessment criteria that go beyond credit scores, encouraging financial institutions to consider factors such as course potential and future earning capabilities.
    • Protection of educational aspirations: The ruling safeguards students’ educational aspirations, preventing loan rejections solely based on credit scores and allowing deserving students to pursue their studies.
    • Precedent for future cases: The ruling sets a precedent for future cases, promoting a more holistic and compassionate approach in evaluating education loan applications, and potentially influencing other courts and financial institutions.

    Way Forward

    • Peer-to-Peer Lending Networks: Facilitate peer-to-peer lending platforms for education loans, connecting students directly with lenders and expanding access to funding.
    • Education Loan Guarantee Funds: Establish funds to guarantee education loans, reducing risk for lenders and encouraging loans to students with lower credit scores.
    • Financial Literacy Programs: Implement comprehensive financial literacy programs to equip students with knowledge and skills for responsible financial management.
    • Industry-Academia Initiatives: Foster collaborations between industry and academia to provide scholarships, internships, and grants, supporting students’ education and future employability.
    • Innovative Repayment Models: Explore income-share agreements and flexible repayment options to align loan repayment with individual earnings and ease financial burden.
    • Crowdfunding for Education: Utilize crowdfunding platforms dedicated to education, enabling students to raise funds for their educational expenses from a wider audience.
    • Collaborative Industry Sponsorship: Encourage partnerships where companies sponsor education loans in exchange for an internship or job placement opportunities, benefiting both students and companies.